Home Blog

‘Justice Cannot Be an Afterthought’: RULAAC blasts Coal City University over assault scandal, alleges cover-up

The Rule of Law and Accountability Advocacy Centre (RULAAC) has launched a blistering attack on the management of Coal City University (CCU) in Enugu State, accusing the institution of trampling on the principles of justice, due process and fair hearing in its handling of the widely condemned assault of a female student.

In a strongly worded statement issued on Thursday, RULAAC Executive Director, Okechukwu Nwanguma, dismissed the university’s recent suspension of the staff member accused of participating in the assault and its decision to review earlier disciplinary measures as little more than a public relations exercise forced by mounting outrage.

According to the rights group, the university’s actions suggest that its leadership acted first and sought the facts later.

“While the admission that a review is necessary is welcome, it raises a fundamental question,” Nwanguma said. “Why were disciplinary sanctions imposed in the first place without a proper investigation and fair hearing?”

He argued that a genuine commitment to accountability would have required management to establish the facts before taking punitive action.

“Instead, the victim of an alleged violent assault was suspended alongside students whose apparent offence was documenting and exposing the incident. That reflects a rush to judgment that disregards the most basic principles of justice.”

RULAAC contended that the university’s apparent reversal was driven not by introspection but by sustained public criticism and intense media scrutiny.

“The sudden reconsideration appears less the product of institutional reflection than the result of mounting public pressure and concerns over possible regulatory consequences,” Nwanguma stated. “Had the university genuinely sought the truth from the outset, widespread public outrage would not have been necessary.”

The organisation also expressed concern over allegations that individuals claiming to represent the university attempted to intimidate journalists who reported on the controversy.

“Whether or not such persons acted with official authorisation, any attempt to silence reporters or discourage scrutiny only deepens public suspicion and undermines confidence in the institution’s commitment to accountability,” the statement said.

RULAAC further criticised suggestions that lawyers, activists and journalists highlighting the incident were trying to tarnish the university’s image.

“The issue is not about bringing down Coal City University,” Nwanguma said. “It is about upholding standards. Universities are not merely centres for awarding degrees; they are moral and intellectual communities expected to uphold human dignity, critical thinking and respect for the rule of law.”

He warned that allegations of physical assault by university officials, punitive action against the victim and retaliation against whistleblowers collectively paint a troubling picture of an institution more concerned with reputation management than justice.

The comments come amid continuing fallout from the alleged assault of Miss Divine, a 300-level Physiotherapy student, at the university’s Thinkers Corner Hostel on June 10.

According to multiple reports, the incident began after the student chose to remain in her hostel to study while lecturers in her department were reportedly on strike over unpaid salaries.

Witnesses alleged that after refusing to relocate, the student was physically attacked by a female hostel manager, who allegedly dragged her by the hair and repeatedly struck her. The situation allegedly escalated when other university officials, including a Catholic Reverend Sister and the institution’s Chief Security Officer, joined in restraining and assaulting her.

A viral video from the incident captured the visibly distressed student crying out, “What crime have I committed to deserve this brutality?” while pleading for the violence to stop.

The controversy intensified after reports emerged that the university suspended the assaulted student and sanctioned fellow students who recorded the incident, prompting accusations that whistleblowers were being punished instead of protected.

Fresh allegations also surfaced that management attempted to discourage students from speaking publicly about the affair and restricted communication channels through which parents could demand accountability.

Against that backdrop, RULAAC has called for an independent, transparent and credible review of the university’s handling of the case.

The organisation urged Coal City University to immediately reverse what it described as unjust disciplinary measures against both the assaulted student and those who documented the incident, while ensuring that anyone found responsible for the alleged abuse is held accountable.

It also called on the National Universities Commission and other relevant regulatory authorities to closely monitor the institution’s response to ensure that justice is not sacrificed for institutional self-preservation.

“Educational institutions occupy a position of trust in society,” Nwanguma said. “That trust depends not on claims of excellence but on adherence to justice, dignity, accountability and respect for fundamental rights.

“How Coal City University responds to this crisis will determine whether it is genuinely committed to those principles or merely invokes them when public pressure leaves it with no alternative.”

Follow our WhatsApp Channel

Harry and Meghan to return to UK with Archie and Lilibet after four years as royal reunion buzz grows

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are reportedly preparing for their first family visit to the United Kingdom in four years, a trip that could reunite King Charles III with his California-based grandchildren and reignite hopes of easing one of the most public rifts in modern royal history.

According to British media reports, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are expected to travel to the UK next month with their two children, Prince Archie, seven, and Princess Lilibet, five, marking the young siblings’ first visit to Britain together in several years.

The visit is scheduled to coincide with celebrations marking one year until the 2027 Invictus Games in Birmingham, the international sporting event founded by Prince Harry to support wounded and recovering service personnel.

While no official meetings with members of the Royal Family have been confirmed, the prospect of Archie and Lilibet returning to British soil has intensified speculation over whether King Charles will seize the opportunity to spend time with his grandchildren.

The family last gathered publicly during celebrations for Queen Elizabeth II’s Platinum Jubilee in 2022.

Harry and Meghan stepped back from their roles as senior working royals in 2020 before relocating to California, where they have since built a new life centred on commercial ventures, philanthropy and media production.

Their departure was followed by a series of high-profile interviews, documentaries and Prince Harry’s memoir, Spare, in which the couple detailed their experiences within the monarchy, citing media scrutiny, institutional tensions and a desire for greater independence.

Since leaving Britain, Prince Harry has returned on several occasions for major royal events, including the funeral of Queen Elizabeth II in 2022 and the coronation of King Charles III the following year. Meghan and the couple’s children, however, have remained largely absent from the UK, making the planned July trip particularly significant.

Reports indicate that security arrangements have been put in place to facilitate the family’s visit, an issue that has previously featured prominently in Prince Harry’s concerns about returning to Britain with his wife and children.

Beyond the royal spotlight, the Duke and Duchess continue to expand their commercial and charitable activities in the United States.

Meghan has been growing her lifestyle brand, As Ever, recently promoting a range of pantry and wellness products and collaborating with wellness company Clevr Blends on a limited-edition strawberry matcha offering that reportedly sold out shortly after launch.

The couple, through their Archewell Productions banner, are also working on an upcoming Netflix documentary focusing on veterans of the war in Afghanistan, reflecting Prince Harry’s longstanding commitment to military and veterans’ causes.

For royal watchers, however, the biggest question surrounding next month’s visit is not business but family.

Whether the trip becomes merely another stop on Prince Harry’s calendar or the backdrop for a long-awaited reunion with King Charles and other senior royals remains uncertain. But after years of strained relations and transatlantic distance, the Sussexes’ planned return is already shaping up to be one of the most closely watched royal events of the summer.

Follow our WhatsApp Channel

‘They Promised to Help, Then Went Silent’: Widow of driver allegedly killed by Air Force officers speaks out

The widow of commercial bus driver Joseph Okpe, who allegedly died after being beaten by personnel of the Nigerian Air Force along the Oshodi–Apapa Expressway in Lagos, has accused the military of abandoning her family after an initial condolence visit and promise of support.

Speaking in an emotional interview, Grace Joseph said representatives of the Air Force visited her shortly after her husband’s death, offered words of comfort and assured the family they would not be left alone. But weeks later, she says those assurances have not translated into meaningful assistance.

“They came and the way they spoke gave me hope,” the grieving mother of three said. “I felt encouraged by what they told us. But after they left, everything changed. I have not heard from them again.”

Her husband, she said, was the family’s sole provider.

“He was the one feeding us and taking care of the children. Now he is gone, and I don’t know why they have not come back or contacted us again.”

The Nigerian Air Force had earlier confirmed that officers allegedly involved in the incident had been detained and that an investigation was underway.

In a statement issued on Tuesday, Air Commodore Ehimen Ejodame, spokesperson for the service, said the Air Force was “deeply saddened by the loss of life” and had immediately taken the suspected personnel into custody.

“Upon receiving information on the matter, the personnel suspected to be involved were immediately taken into custody, and the case is currently under investigation by the appropriate civil and military authorities,” the statement said.

It also noted that Air Force representatives visited the bereaved family to express sympathy and support during their difficult time.

But Grace says that visit has not been followed by any sustained assistance.

According to her, officials handed her ₦200,000 during the condolence visit to help care for her children, but she has received neither further communication nor additional support since then.

“They gave me ₦200,000 and said I should use it to feed the children. Since that day, I have never received another call from them,” she said quietly. “I feel very sad about it. I really do.”

Her greatest concern now is the future of the couple’s three children, aged 14, 10 and five.

The youngest, she said, continues to struggle with his father’s absence.

“The children keep asking about their father, especially the youngest one. Since the day my husband died, he has been crying because he misses him.”

She appealed to the government to intervene by helping secure the children’s education and welfare.

“I want the government to help me train my children and support their education. Their father was responsible for everything they needed. I want them to have a future.”

Grace also recounted the devastating night she learned her husband had died.

The couple had left home separately that morning—she to visit a relative and her husband to begin his day’s work driving.

Later that evening, after 8 p.m., she received an unexpected phone call informing her that he had been involved in an accident.

Alarmed, she contacted members of his family and tried to reach the hospital where he had reportedly been taken. But transportation proved difficult to find late at night.

As they coordinated with medical staff by telephone and pleaded that he receive urgent care until they arrived, another call came just minutes later.

The doctor informed her that her husband had died.

“The next morning, I went to the hospital,” she recalled. “When I got there, I saw my husband lying on the bed.”

Joseph Okpe reportedly died hours after an altercation involving personnel alleged to be attached to the Nigerian Air Force following a minor traffic incident on the Oshodi–Apapa Expressway.

The circumstances surrounding the confrontation remain under investigation by both civil and military authorities.

For Grace Joseph, the investigation is important. But every morning, the more immediate reality is explaining to three children—one just five years old—why the man who left home for work never came back.

Follow our WhatsApp Channel

Civil Defence arrests man for alleged incest and sexual abuse of 14-year-old daughter in Kwara

The Kwara State Command of the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC), has arrested a 40-year-old man, AbdulRauf Ambali, over allegations of incest, unlawful sexual intercourse with his 14-year-old biological daughter, and procurement of abortion.

The spokesperson for the command, ASC 1 Ayoola Michael Shola, who disclosed this in a statement on Wednesday, June 17, 2026 said the victim disclosed that she had earlier fled from her father’s residence after allegedly enduring months of sexual abuse and intimidation.

According to the statement, the suspect was apprehended following credible information received from concerned members of the public in Alapa, Asa Local Government Area of Kwara State.

Read Also: Depraved Akwa Ibom pastor earns 49 years imprisonment for raping and impregnating teenage daughter

“The matter was initially reported at the Alapa Divisional Office on the 16th of June, 2026, and was subsequently transferred to the Command’s Gender Unit for comprehensive investigation,” the statement read.

“Ironically, the case was first brought to the attention of the Corps by the suspect himself, who reported that his 14 year-old daughter, had been missing from home for approximately three weeks.

“Upon receipt of the report, operatives of the Gender Unit immediately commenced investigation and successfully traced the minor.

“During the course of interviews and victim engagement, the girl disclosed that she had deliberately fled from her father’s residence after allegedly enduring months of sexual abuse and intimidation.

“Preliminary findings revealed that the victim had lived with her grandmother since childhood before being taken into her father’s custody in December 2025 under the pretext of providing parental care and support.

“The victim alleged that shortly after moving into his residence, her father began subjecting her to repeated sexual abuse.

“The minor further disclosed that she was frequently threatened, beaten, and intimidated whenever she resisted the suspect’s advances.

“According to her account, the abuse persisted until she could no longer endure the situation, prompting her to leave home without informing anyone of her whereabouts.

“Investigation further revealed that the victim allegedly became pregnant in May 2026 as a result of the repeated sexual abuse.

“Findings indicate that the suspect subsequently took the minor to a private facility where a medical examination confirmed the pregnancy.

“Further inquiries revealed that arrangements were thereafter made for the pregnancy to be terminated.

“The victim also alleged that she was repeatedly warned not to disclose the incidents to anyone and was later advised to undergo family planning measures to prevent future pregnancies.

“In the course of investigation, the suspect reportedly admitted to having unlawful sexual relations with the minor.”

The Kwara State Commandant, Commandant Abbas Ndah Mohammed, condemned the alleged act in the strongest terms, describing it as a heinous betrayal of parental responsibility and a grave violation of the rights, dignity, and wellbeing of a child.

The Commandant reiterated the unwavering commitment of the Corps to the protection of children and other vulnerable members of society.

He stressed that the NSCDC will continue to deploy all lawful means to combat gender-based violence, child abuse, exploitation, and related offense across the state.

He further urged members of the public to remain vigilant and promptly report cases of child abuse, domestic violence, sexual exploitation, and other criminal activities to security agencies, assuring that all reports will be treated with utmost confidentiality and professionalism.”

Follow our WhatsApp Channel

Baze Uni VC says WhatsApp, TikTok, Facebook have turned hometowns into “portable villages,” allowing migrants to carry home wherever they go

(L-R) Prof. Adeniyi greeting Mr. Chukwuma Nwokoh and Mr. Fred Ohwahwa (all Guardian Newspaper Alumni) at the 7th inaugural lecture of Baze University, Abuja

In a thought-provoking inaugural lecture, the academic argues that digital platforms have fundamentally reshaped migration, identity and memory, allowing people to carry their communities, obligations and histories wherever they go.

There was a time when leaving home meant exactly that.

Young people boarded buses from their villages to cities or planes to foreign countries, often losing daily contact with family, friends and community. Distance created absence, and absence gradually reshaped identity.

But according to Prof Abiodun Adeniyi, the new Vice Chancellor of Baze University, that era is over.

In a thought-provoking inaugural lecture, the Professor of Communication & Media Epistemology argued that the smartphone has fundamentally rewritten the meaning of migration and belonging, creating what he describes as a “portable village” that allows people to carry their communities with them wherever they go.

His central thesis is both simple and profound: you may leave your village, but your village no longer leaves you.

Thanks to WhatsApp groups, Facebook pages, TikTok videos, Zoom meetings and constant mobile connectivity, migrants today remain immersed in the social, cultural and emotional life of home even while living thousands of kilometres away.

The professor contends that technology has collapsed the traditional barriers of distance, transforming villages from physical locations into living digital networks that exist on the screens people carry in their pockets.

The implications stretch far beyond convenience.

Family meetings that once required everyone to gather beneath a tree or in a community hall now happen over video calls. Fundraising for local projects is coordinated through messaging apps. Birthdays, weddings and funerals are streamed live across continents, allowing relatives abroad to participate almost as if they were physically present.

For millions in Nigeria’s vast diaspora, migration no longer means disconnection. It means maintaining two lives at once—one rooted where they live and another sustained daily through digital interaction with home.

The lecture suggests that social media has become the modern equivalent of the village square.

Instead of neighbours exchanging news face to face, discussions unfold in WhatsApp groups. Community announcements circulate on Facebook. Cultural traditions are shared on YouTube and TikTok, while hometown associations organise development initiatives through online platforms that never close.

In that sense, the village has not disappeared. It has simply become portable.

The professor also argues that this transformation has changed how people understand identity itself. A migrant living in London, Toronto or Johannesburg may still participate in family decisions, contribute to community projects and remain subject to the expectations of relatives and hometown networks back in Nigeria.

Physical relocation no longer guarantees emotional or social separation.

Yet the lecture is not an unqualified celebration of technology.

It warns that the same digital tools that preserve memory and strengthen relationships can also create new forms of surveillance and pressure. Every post, photograph or message contributes to a lasting digital footprint, making it increasingly difficult for individuals to escape scrutiny or reinvent themselves.

In many cases, social expectations that once existed only within the confines of a physical community now follow people across borders through their phones.

The result is a paradox: technology has made the world feel smaller while simultaneously expanding the reach of the communities people thought they had left behind.

The professor further observes that online platforms increasingly function like traditional social institutions, complete with gatekeepers, unwritten rules and systems of approval or exclusion. Algorithms determine visibility, group administrators enforce norms and online audiences reward or punish behaviour in ways that mirror community life offline.

For younger generations, especially those raised in the age of smartphones, the distinction between physical and digital communities is becoming increasingly blurred.

The lecture therefore challenges long-held assumptions about migration, suggesting that departure is no longer a clean break but a continuous negotiation between multiple places and identities.

In practical terms, it means a Nigerian studying in Canada can wake up to family messages from Enugu, attend a village association meeting on Zoom during lunch, contribute to a fundraising campaign via mobile banking in the evening and watch local cultural events on TikTok before going to bed—all without setting foot in Nigeria.

The village, in effect, has travelled with them.

As societies become ever more interconnected, the professor believes policymakers, researchers and technology companies must recognise that digital platforms are no longer mere communication tools. They have become powerful social spaces that shape memory, belonging, obligation and identity.

His message ultimately reframes one of humanity’s oldest experiences. Migration once meant leaving home in search of opportunity. In the digital age, home may simply be another app on the screen.

And that may be the most profound technological transformation of all.

Follow our WhatsApp Channel

Ex-petroleum minister Diezani Alison-Madueke cleared of bribery charges by UK court

Nigeria’s former Minister of Petroleum Resources, Diezani Alison-Madueke, has been cleared of all bribery charges brought against her by British prosecutors after a jury at a London court returned not-guilty verdicts on Wednesday.

Mrs Alison-Madueke, who served as Nigeria’s petroleum minister between 2010 and 2015 under former President Goodluck Jonathan, was acquitted of five counts of accepting bribes and one count of conspiracy to commit bribery.

The former minister, 65, had consistently denied the allegations.

Prosecutors alleged that Mrs Alison-Madueke received lavish benefits and enjoyed what they described as “a life of luxury” in London, funded by oil and gas industry figures seeking favourable treatment and lucrative contracts in Nigeria’s petroleum sector.


However, the former minister had maintained throughout the trial that she neither accepted bribes nor exercised direct control over the award of government contracts.

Following more than 46 hours of deliberations, jurors at Southwark Crown Court found her not guilty on all six counts, Reuters reported.

The verdict represents a major setback for British authorities, whose investigation into corruption allegations involving the former minister began more than a decade ago.

Mrs Alison-Madueke was one of the most influential figures in Nigeria’s oil industry during her tenure and also briefly served as president of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC).

She stood trial alongside oil industry executive Olatimbo Ayinde, 54, who faced one count of bribery relating to Ms Alison-Madueke and another count of bribing a foreign public official.

The court’s decision brings to a close one of the most closely watched international corruption cases involving a former Nigerian public official.

The former minister was standing trial over allegations of corruption, having been charged in 2023 with five counts of accepting bribes and one count of conspiracy to commit bribery.

UK prosecutors say the charges are linked to the awarding of oil and gas contracts during her tenure as petroleum minister between 2010 and 2015.

Mrs Alison-Madueke also served as president of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries between 2014 and 2015. She relocated to the United Kingdom after the defeat of the People’s Democratic Party in Nigeria’s 2015 presidential election. She also faces multiple corruption cases in Nigeria, some of which have stalled due to her absence.

Nigerian courts, however, have ordered the forfeiture of assets worth billions of naira linked to her.

In January, PREMIUM TIMES reported how Nigerian oil contractors opulently funded Mrs Alison-Madueke’s lavish UK lifestyle.

Prosecutors allege that several Nigerian businessmen funded lavish expenses on her behalf, including more than £2 million spent at Harrods and about £4.6 million spent on refurbishing properties in London and Buckinghamshire.

According to the prosecution, some of the purchases were made using payment cards linked to Nigerian businessman Kolawole Aluko and his company, Tenka Limited.

The case also includes allegations that she had access to luxury properties, including a £2.8 million home in Marylebone and residences overlooking Regent’s Park, as well as a “grand” home in Buckinghamshire.

During her court appearance, the former minister denied all allegations. Mrs Alison-Madueke told the court that the NNPC reimbursed expenses incurred on her behalf during official engagements.

“I can state categorically that at no point did I ask for, take or receive a bribe of any sort… and did not abuse my office,” she said during one of her court hearings, according to BBC.

She explained that a logistics company was set up in London to handle official arrangements because of what she described as a disorganised financial structure at the NNPC at the time.

The verdict announced on Wednesday marks a significant setback for British authorities, whose investigation into the former minister’s activities spanned more than a decade.

Follow our WhatsApp Channel

The Digital Divide: Why journalists struggle with laptops in developing regions, By Emmanuel Ajibulu

Journalists across the globe increasingly rely on laptops as their primary tool for reporting, editing, and publishing. Yet, for many, especially those working in developing regions, this reliance comes with formidable challenges that hinder productivity and compromise press freedom.

One of the most pressing obstacles is the high cost of modern laptops. Advanced devices capable of handling multimedia editing, data visualization, and investigative research remain financially inaccessible to many professionals, leaving them dependent on outdated or underpowered machines.

Even when equipment is available, limited digital literacy poses another barrier. Skills such as video editing, graphic design, and secure data management are increasingly essential in modern journalism, yet many practitioners lack adequate training to fully leverage these tools.

Security risks further compound the problem. Journalists are highly vulnerable to malware, phishing attacks, and pervasive digital surveillance.

These threats not only endanger personal safety but also jeopardize the confidentiality of sources, an issue particularly critical in regions where press freedom is fragile and protective infrastructure is minimal.

Beyond technical and security concerns, systemic issues severely restrict productivity. In many developing regions, inadequate power supply leads to frequent interruptions, forcing journalists to work under unpredictable conditions.

The absence of reliable corporate internet access further limits their ability to conduct timely research, publish stories, and collaborate with colleagues across borders.

Together, these challenges illustrate a stark digital divide.

While laptops have become indispensable tools for journalism worldwide, their effectiveness is undermined by financial, technical, and infrastructural barriers.

Successfully addressing the challenges faced by journalists in developing regions requires a multi-pronged strategy that tackles cost, skills, safety, and systemic barriers. Affordable device programs, targeted digital literacy training, stronger cybersecurity measures, and infrastructure improvements such as reliable electricity and internet connectivity are essential to empowering journalists and safeguarding the free flow of information.

Affordable device initiatives can play a transformative role. Governments, NGOs, and media organizations should consider subsidizing or bulk-purchasing laptops for journalists.

Refurbished devices and low-cost alternatives, such as Chromebooks, offer practical solutions without prohibitive costs. Strategic partnerships with technology companies can further ensure access to modern tools at reduced prices, bridging the gap between resource limitations and professional needs.

Equally important is digital literacy training. Journalists must be equipped with the skills to navigate multimedia editing, data visualization, and investigative reporting tools.

Structured training programs, online modules, and peer-led workshops can help practitioners adapt to evolving digital demands, ensuring they remain competitive in a rapidly changing media landscape.

Cybersecurity remains a critical concern.

Providing journalists with cybersecurity support, including training on safe digital practices, access to VPNs, secure communication platforms, and reliable antivirus software, protects both their personal safety and the confidentiality of their sources. Advocacy for stronger legal protections against surveillance and harassment further reinforces this safety net.

Beyond technology, systemic improvements are vital. Expanding infrastructure support, such as reliable electricity grids, backup power solutions, and affordable broadband, directly enhances productivity. Community-based internet hubs or co-working spaces can provide shared access to stable connectivity, enabling journalists to conduct timely research, publish stories, and collaborate across borders.

More pointedly is the fact that, the human dimension must not be overlooked. Addressing stress from digital insecurity and unstable working conditions through mental health support, counseling, and peer-support networks is crucial. Flexible work arrangements and orientation manuals for digital journalists can ease transitions into modern reporting environments, reducing anxiety and fostering resilience.

Emmanuel Ajibulu is an infoprenuer, publisher of Veracity Desk (www.veracitydesk.com), writer, communication consultant and social media influencer. He wrote via [email protected]

Follow our WhatsApp Channel

Lost lessons of June 12, by Monday Philips Ekpe

Democracy Day can only make sense if the nation learns and adapts its historical significance adequately, writes MONDAY PHILIPS EKPE

Ask Nigerians what they think about the current system of government that was warmly welcomed back on May 29, 1999. Those who witnessed it would most likely express their disillusionment. Those born within this Fourth Republic, especially the Gen Z, would either be lost for the right words or spew out some invectives and then return to their phones – social media – for succour. What else do they turn to, anyway? They live with the consequences of government’s underperformance daily and find it hard to imagine that the country wasn’t always this discomfiting and inhibiting. They practically know no other life.

But the real tragedy of our own variant of democracy is not just that its dividends have remained largely elusive, what one of its finest moments is begging to teach us has been ignored for too long. For the record, Nigeria had always marked May 29 as Democracy Day since 2000 before the government of President Muhammadu Buhari changed it to June 12 in honour of the presidential election of 1993 believed to be the nation’s freest and fairest which was won by Chief Moshood Abiola but was annulled by the then Military President Ibrahim Babangida. In trying to right that wrong, Buhari officially declared Chief Abiola the winner, awarded him the highest national honour and effected the date change.

Many people saw those moves differently, however. To them, the former leader was only pandering to the sentiments and agitations of western Nigeria, Abiola’s home base, to secure crucial votes in his 2019 re-election bid. Anyway, scheming and politics are regular bed-mates. But as I’ve argued elsewhere, the justifications for shifting democracy’s commemoration date from the anniversary of the last exit of soldiers from political power under such a partisan atmosphere may later wear off and give way to resentment, if not widespread noncompliance. Here’s why. As momentous as June 12 is, it hasn’t been properly established as a true national monument, a moment in which the fault lines that are still trying to crush the Nigerian spirit melted in the face of the country’s unanimous and overriding hunger for a return to civil rule.

Another catalyst for the decisive, popular resolve demonstrated 33 years ago was the very personality of Abiola. There was something about his mass appeal which swept across Nigeria like frankincense. Here was a billionaire, easily among Nigeria’s richest and one of its most colourful, who refused to lose touch with the downtrodden. I still wonder whenever I pass through Toyin Street in Ikeja, Lagos what made the place suitable for his residence when he could comfortably acquire luxuriant, palatial homes in Ikoyi, Victoria Island and elsewhere. His campaign tagged “Hope 93” was simply magical. Both rich and poor queued up from Lagos to Sokoto, Maiduguri to Calabar, to press their thumbs into the Social Democratic Party (SDP) spaces on the ballot papers. No Moslem-Moslem ticket dichotomy. No my-turn, your-turn syndrome.

There’s a whole lot to unpack about June 12, if not for the sake of the old who may have taken an eternal stand, it could be for those who were then either unborn or mature enough to digest that historic period. Political historians should be interested in how a true national mandate quickly became minimised to a regional one. What made Abiola succeed where Chief Obafemi Awolowo, arguably the west’s most revered leader, failed. How such an ambitious, monumental, albeit aborted, occasion was reduced to an “injustice” done to a section of the federation. Sadly, that sentiment seems to have attached itself permanently to this somewhat sacred date. The nation appears to have squandered a chance to forge genuine nationhood based on the positives of that election. Something could unravel down the line that might challenge the suitability or credibility of the official date to celebrate our democracy.

A little here and a little there, the quest for rotational presidency began during the legendary democratic struggle of the 1990s like Siamese twins. The immediate beneficiary of that circumstantial blackmail, the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), made a kill of the sentiment and rode on it to power; an attitude that has now degenerated to entitlement, otherwise called “emilokan” or “awalokan”. Never mind that rotation hasn’t yet found its way into the constitution. It’s already etched on the psyche of many Nigerians. If only that would lead us to a desirable destination. No one is sure that it will. What is certain is that, in a metaphysical sense, Nigerians are still in search of an Abiola figure, someone truly loved by majority of the people for his humanity, vision and drive. A nationalist devoid of known myopic inclinations and practices.

Fast forward to the present. Three decades are long enough to move any individual, institution or country either upwards or downwards in any index of development. The fear, uncertainties and authoritarianism experienced during military incursions into government left Nigerians with no viable options than go for democracy. They had gone through colonial rule. Endured the foibles and excesses of the First Republic politicians which ultimately resulted in the coup of 1966. Watched the shortcomings of the administration of Alhaji Shehu Shagari that served as the pretext for the comeback of the khaki boys. Were almost overcome by the recklessness and dictatorship of jackboot leaderships from December 1983 to 1999. General Abdulsalam Abubakar’s hand-over to President Olusegun Obasanjo on May 29, 1999 couldn’t have come at a better time. A huge relief that has been going southwards, unfortunately.

One doesn’t need to be a sceptic or pessimist to wonder whether what obtains now is worth celebrating. But then, the very concept of perfection is otherworldly. Meaning, the way forward will always be fraught with challenges. Luckily, our past wasn’t always despicable. So, to make progress, learn from June 12 we must. Nigerians are capable of setting their differences aside and speaking with one voice. The present election umpire can exhibit probity. Public perception is indispensable here. The political class can display maturity in this game against all odds. Alhaji Bashir Tofa, Abiola’s opponent who accepted the result without drama and one of the most unappreciated leading lights of that era, deserves to be emulated by the opposition.

Away from grandstanding and belabouring his role in the restoration of our democracy, President Bola Tinubu should lead the way in ensuring that Abiola and indeed the rest slain heroes did not pay the ultimate price in vain.

Ekpe, PhD, is a member of THISDAY Editorial Board
X: @monday_ekpe2

The views expressed by contributors are strictly personal and not of Law & Society Magazine.

Follow our WhatsApp Channel

UEFA Chief’s Verbal Blunder: Why leaders must mind the tone from the top

By Kachi Okezie, Esq.

Words from the top of football never stay in the room where they are spoken. They move fast, they harden as they travel, and they land hardest on the people who have the least power to answer back. That is why Aleksander Ceferin’s reported remark about the 48-team World Cup was more than a slip about tournament quality. To say that the expanded format produces “a lot of matches that are completely uninteresting” may sound like technical analysis from a UEFA president who has spent years arguing over calendars and competitive balance.

But context is everything, and the context here is a World Cup that, for the first time, gives Cape Verde, Curaçao, Uzbekistan and Jordan their debut on the biggest stage, while Congo and Haiti return after five decades in the cold. To those nations, and to the millions of supporters who waited lifetimes to hear their anthem in a World Cup stadium, no game is uninteresting. No game is a filler. Every game is history.

The 13 member associations that responded in a joint statement understood that immediately. They did not shout. They did not insult. They chose the harder path of collective dignity. “We respectfully but firmly reject these comments,” they wrote. “For our countries, there is no such thing as an unimportant World Cup match.” That line should be framed and hung in every executive office from Nyon to Zurich. It is a correction, but it is also a lesson.

Football’s strength, as they reminded us, comes from its universality, not from a hierarchy that ranks some nations as worthy of attention and others as background noise. The member associations were right to speak up and right to do it in one solid voice. That unity is the team spirit football preaches on the pitch, and it must be practiced off it too. When small nations stand together, they are not asking for charity. They are demanding the respect they earned on the field, and they are showing larger associations how solidarity actually works.

What this episode exposes most clearly is the burden that comes with high office. A UEFA president is not a fan with a microphone. Every sentence he utters is read as policy, every criticism is read as a verdict, every offhand remark is treated as doctrine. That does not mean leaders must speak in riddles or avoid hard truths. It means they must be exceptionally guarded in how they say them.

You can debate fixture load, commercial pressure, or the dilution of quality without ever implying that a nation’s participation is trivial. You can defend elite competition without diminishing the dignity of emerging teams.

Ceferin’s office has since said it has “no knowledge” of the quote, which only proves the point further: in 2026, a leader must assume that every word will be recorded, shared, and interpreted. Caution is not censorship. It is responsibility. The higher the office, the smaller the margin for error, because the damage done by careless language is never distributed equally. It falls on the players who have already fought harder for less.

There is a parallel test of that same responsibility that deserves the same public defence, and the quiet around it is telling. Somali referee Omar Artan was denied entry to the United States for the World Cup over alleged links to militant groups, allegations he denies. He held a FIFA badge, a diplomatic passport, and, by his account, the right visa. He called it the “biggest dream of his life.” If the football family is serious about universality, then the exclusion of a FIFA-rated official from the sport’s showcase must draw the same condemnation as the belittling of member nations. The principle does not change because the person carries a whistle instead of a jersey. Merit, process, and dignity apply to referees as much as to players. To defend every match but stay silent on every official is to make solidarity selective, and selective solidarity is just another form of exclusion.

It would have been equally in order for football’s leadership to speak with one voice on Artan’s case, to demand transparency and due process, and to remind host nations that the World Cup belongs to the whole game, not just to the teams that sell the most shirts.

Lessons must be learned from both moments if we want a healthier football culture. The first lesson is for leaders. Power requires discipline of speech. A president must see the whole board, not just his corner of it. He must weigh not only the tactical point he wants to make about format or quality, but also the cultural signal he sends about who matters in the game.

The second lesson is for the associations. The joint statement from 13 nations is a model for how football should govern itself. Respectful, firm, collective. It shows that dignity is defended in chorus. When Ghana stands with Morocco, when Haiti stands with Uzbekistan, when Cape Verde stands with Senegal, the message is louder than any press release from a single federation.

The third lesson is for all of us who love the game. A culture that rejects the idea of unimportant matches must also reject the idea of expendable people. Every player who earns his place deserves to play. Every referee who earns his badge deserves to officiate. Every fan who saves for years to attend deserves to believe their game counts.

Football is more than sport because it mirrors the world. It reflects our best instincts for teamwork and our worst instincts for hierarchy.

Ceferin’s words, whether misquoted or not, remind us that leaders must be judged by the impact of their language, not just the intent. The 13 nations’ response reminds us that unity is still football’s sharpest weapon against condescension. And Artan’s case reminds us that the work of inclusion is never finished.

The game will be healthier when every executive chooses words as carefully as a captain chooses a pass, when every association defends every member as fiercely as a defender blocks a shot, and when we all understand that the value of a World Cup is not measured only in goals or revenue, but in the number of people who feel seen. That is the standard now. That is the standard we should hold, from the top office down to the last qualifier.


Kachi Okezie, Esq is a sports lawyer and commentator.

The views expressed by contributors are strictly personal and not of Law & Society Magazine.

Follow our WhatsApp Channel

Horror Behind Closed Doors: Woman rescued after 16 months in chains by own brother, as Anambra child abuse case stokes national outrage

Two deeply disturbing cases emerging from Abuja and Anambra State have reignited concerns over the growing prevalence of extreme abuse within homes, with investigators confronting allegations so harrowing that they have left even seasoned law enforcement officers shaken.

In the Federal Capital Territory, police say they rescued a 36-year-old woman who had allegedly been chained inside a locked room by her own brother for more than one year and four months, living in conditions the Commissioner of Police described as among the most dehumanising he had ever encountered.

The victim, identified as Grace Aniekuoku, was discovered after the FCT Police Command received a distress call on June 12.

According to Commissioner of Police Ahmed Sanusi, detectives dispatched to the residence initially met resistance when the suspect, Chinedu Aniekuoku, allegedly refused to allow officers into the property.

Police subsequently invoked their legal powers of ingress and forced entry into the premises.

What officers reportedly found inside was a scene of profound neglect.

Sanusi said the woman had been confined in a room where she ate, slept and relieved herself without assistance or basic sanitation. Her hair had become severely overgrown, while prolonged confinement and deprivation had left her dangerously emaciated.

“She stayed in her own faeces and excreta. She ate there, defecated there and nobody cared for her welfare,” the commissioner said, adding that she was rushed to hospital immediately after being rescued.

Authorities say they hope the victim survives long enough to recount what happened during her captivity.

Missing Child Deepens Mystery

The investigation has taken an even darker turn with police alleging that the suspect removed his sister’s son to an undisclosed location approximately two years ago before confining her to prevent questions about the child’s disappearance.

Commissioner Sanusi said investigators are exploring the possibility that the missing child may have been subjected to ritual-related crime, although that line of inquiry remains under active investigation.

Security agencies are continuing efforts to trace and rescue the child, while the suspect remains in custody pending prosecution.

Separate Horror in Anambra

The Abuja case unfolded as authorities in Anambra State investigated another alleged act of extraordinary cruelty involving a 10-year-old domestic worker.

Human rights lawyer Barrister Ikechukwu Obasi called for a comprehensive investigation after videos and photographs circulating online appeared to show the child covered in severe injuries allegedly inflicted by his employers.

According to Obasi, the couple accused in the case allegedly tied the boy in a bush, abandoned him without food and subjected him to prolonged abuse that left visible wounds across his body.

Residents who confronted the suspects were heard condemning the alleged treatment in emotional videos shared online, describing the acts as heartless and inhumane.

“This goes far beyond child discipline,” Obasi said, arguing that the allegations could constitute serious criminal offences including child abuse, unlawful confinement and grievous assault.

“No child—whether a biological child, ward or house help—should ever be subjected to violence, torture, starvation or abandonment.”

Police Arrest Suspects, Victim Receiving Care

The Anambra State Police Command confirmed that three suspects are in custody in connection with the incident.

Police spokesperson SP Tochukwu Ikenga said investigators were gathering evidence after one female suspect allegedly admitted during questioning to using burning plastic to inflict injuries on the boy.

Authorities say the child has since been removed from the environment and is receiving medical attention and support.

In a further sign of official concern, Anambra State First Lady Dr. Nonye Soludo reportedly visited the victim and pledged to support his comprehensive medical and psychological rehabilitation, while state officials confirmed his condition has stabilised.

The boy has also been reunited with his biological mother in an emotional encounter that drew widespread attention online.

A Troubling Pattern of Abuse

Although unrelated, the two cases have underscored the disturbing reality that some of the gravest threats to vulnerable Nigerians can emerge not from strangers but from those entrusted with their care.

For investigators, the alleged chaining of a woman by her own brother and the reported torture of a young houseboy are not merely criminal cases—they are stark reminders of how cruelty can thrive behind closed doors unless neighbours, communities and authorities intervene.

Obasi has urged law enforcement agencies to ensure the Anambra prosecution does not fade after the initial publicity, warning that public confidence depends on accountability as much as arrests.

For the woman rescued in Abuja and the young boy recovering in Anambra, the road ahead is likely to be long. But their stories have already sparked renewed calls for stronger protection of vulnerable people and swift justice against those accused of treating fellow human beings with shocking disregard for their dignity and lives.

Follow our WhatsApp Channel

TIPS