Home Blog Page 974

Amendment Of The Rules Of Professional Conduct In The Legal Profession In Nigeria: Myths And Realities

0

By Bukola Akinola, PhD[1]

Introduction

Many lawyers in Nigeria woke up on the 12th day of September, 2020 to see the purported Rules of Professional Conduct (Amendment) 2020 dated 3rd September, 2020 allegedly amended by the Honourable Attorney General of the Federation pursuant to section 12 (4) of the Legal Practitioners Act 2004 as amended.  The Notice comes with Serial Number S. 1 No. 15 of 2020 which contains only provisions purported to have deleted Rules 9(2), 10, 11, 12 and 13 of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners 2007. The second provision is to the effect that the amended Rules may be cited as the Rules of Professional Conduct, 2020. It is no gain saying the fact that the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners is very vital to the practice of law in Nigeria and beyond. This paper will briefly examine the modus operandi for the amendment of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners.

Power to Make and Revise the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners

The importance of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners cannot be over emphasized. It is one of the spines upon which the legal profession leans. The same importance is given to the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners across several jurisdictions outside Nigeria. We should not play politics with it under any guise. We should faithfully adhere to its tenets and principles. It is either the Rules or nothing. It is important to state that the Rules are made by virtue of the powers conferred on the General Council of the Bar by section 12 (4) of the Legal Practitioners Act 2004.

Section 1 of the Legal Practitioners Act 2004 as amended establishes the General Council of the Bar. The General Council of the Bar (otherwise known as the Bar Council) was first established under section 1 (1) of the Legal Practitiners 1962 and later replaced by the Legal Practitioners Act 1975[2]. The quorum of the Bar Council shall be eight and the Council may make standing orders regulating procedure and proceedings of the Council.[3]

Composition of the General Council of the Bar[4]

  1. The Attorney-General of the Federation as President;
  2. The Attorneys-General of the States;
  • Twenty members of the Bar

In the legal profession, the above composition is a body of eminent personalities who are vested with powers to among others act as one of the gate keepers of the legal profession. They work hand in hand with eminent bodies such as the Body of Benchers and the Nigerian Bar Association to mention a few. The office of the Honourable Attorney – General of the Federation (HAGF) is one of the highly revered bodies in the legal profession and the nation as a whole. The HAGF is a custodian of the values and ethics of the legal profession. Above all other considerations, the HAGF is ‘the legal gate keeper’ of the constitution of the nation. He can only exercise powers conferred on him by statute and no more.

Functions of the General Council of the Bar

A major function of the General Council of the Bar is its power to make and revise the Rules of professional Conduct in the legal profession from time to time.[5] The Bar Council also liaises with the NBA in fixing the annual practising fee for members of the Bar. The Bar Council makes the Legal Practitioners Accounts Rules and oversees the inspection of Solicitor’s accounts from time to time among other statutory functions. See section 20 LPA[6].

Amendment of the Rules of Professional Conduct in the Legal Profession in Nigeria: Myths and Realities.

Being a Council of distinguished legal luminaries, the functions of the Bar Council cannot be hijacked by any individual member of the Council. It is on this basis that the powers of the Bar Council to make and revise the Rules of Professional Conduct in the Legal Profession cannot be delegated to a single member of the profession except the Council in a quorum of 8 of its membership agrees in writing. Such delegation of powers on behalf of the Bar Council cannot be delegated in our view.

Hence, the fact that the Preamble to the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners 2007 is couched as reproduced below does not make it lawful or the norm. An office holder cannot exercise the powers he does not have. It amounts to taking away a man’s wife and telling him not to react. The preamble to the RPC 2007 is reproduced below for our examination:

In exercise of the powers conferred on me by section 12(4) of the Legal Practitioners Act 1990, as amended, and of all other powers enabling me in that behalf, I, BAYO OJO, Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice/ Chairman, General Council of the Bar hereby make the following Rules:

The fact that no one has challenged the way and manner the above is drafted does not render nugatory section 12 (4) of the Legal Practitioners Act 2004 as amended. For the avoidance of doubt, section 12 (4) of the LPA 2004 as amended is reproduced below:

(4) It shall be the duty of the Bar Council to make rules from time to time on professional conduct in the legal profession and cause such rules to be published in the Gazette and distributed to all the branches of the Association.[7]

Unlike the powers of the office of the Chief Justice of Nigeria to make Rules for the proceedings of the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee under section 10 (7) of the LPA 2004 as amended and the powers to suspend an erring legal practitioner for a specified period of time vested in the CJN by virtue of section 13 (2) of the LPA 2004 as amended, the HAGF cannot unilaterally make the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners because neither the HAGF or the Attorney – general of the various states of the Federation are so conferred. Besides, the law has made it easier for the Bar Council to operate smoothly with just 8 members out of a total 57 membership. Forming a quorum by the Bar Council may need an upward review of about one – third or minimum of 15 members in our view but definitely that is the position of the law as of today.

Let us state here that the intention of this paper is not to critique the allegedly deleted provisions of the Rules 9(2), 10, 11, 12 and 13 of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners 2007 but to offer an opinion as to the proper perspective in the powers to make and revise this vital regulation for the noble profession in Nigeria. In the making and revision of the RPC, until the amended RPC is gazetted and distributed in line with the spirit and legislative intent of section 12 (4) LPA 2004 as amended, it is of no effect.

We therefore recommend that the preamble to the RPC 2007 as stated above should be drafted thus:

In exercise of the powers conferred on the Bar Council by section 12(4) of the Legal Practitioners Act 1990, as amended, and of all other powers enabling the Bar Council in that behalf, the, General Council of the Bar hereby make the following Rules:

The legislative intent of the LPA is not to personalize the powers to make and amend the RPC to the office of the Chairman of the Bar Council.

Conclusion

Though, the HAGF being Chairman of the Bar Council can preside and give directives during the meeting of the Council, the power to make and revise the RPC is vested in the Bar Council as a body and not the HAGF as an office created by law and known to law. It is therefore mythical to presume that the preamble to the RPC 2007 as couched is right in law when the searchlight of the provisions of section 12 (4) of the LPA 2004 as amended is beamed in that direction. As stated above, the intention of this writer is not the propriety or otherwise of the subject of amendment but to reflect proper legal perspectives in terms of who is empowered to make and revise the RPC. The subject of amendment is a discourse for another day.

[1] Dr Bukola Akinola is a Deputy Director (Academics) at the Nigerian Law School.

[2] Now Cap 11, LFN 2004

[3] Section 1 (4) of the Legal Practitioners Act Cap L11 LFN 2004

[4] Section 1(2) of the LPA

[5] See section 12 (4) of the Legal Practitioners Act (as amended by the Legal Practitioners (amendment) Decree 1994.

[6] Now Cap 11, LFN 2004

[7] Section 12 (4) of the LPA as amended by LPA 1994 as amended.

Condemnation Of Purported Amendment Of The Rules Of Professional Conduct By AGF, Malami, “Belated & Not Well Rooted In Good Faith”—J.S Okutepa, SAN

0

Senior Advocate of Nigeria and a member of the Body of Benchers, Mr. J.S Okutepa has stated that the wave around the purported amendment of the Rules of Professional Conduct by the Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, is belated and laced with no good faith.

This is contained in a statement issued by the learned silk which was made available to TheNigeriaLawyer (TNL).

“I do no think we as members of the legal profession are consistent in our stand and condemnation of illegally and usurpation of functions particularly on the alleged amendments said to have been made to Rules of Professional Conduct in the Legal Profession 2007.

“This morning I woke up to read from social media that the Hon the Attorney General of the Federation has amended the Rules of Professional Conduct in the Legal Profession 2007.” He said.

Meanwhile, he noted that although he is yet to confirm the veracity of the news going around but however, the condemnation is late.

“I am yet to confirm this. But if the amendments done are indeed at the instance and by the Hon Attorney of the Federation, then I see the condemnation by some legal Practitioners as belated and not well rooted in good faith. The reason is simple.

As lawyers we must be consistent in our stand and positions. I had said before that the appropriate organ saddles with the duty and responsibility to issue and make the Rules of Professional Conduct in the Legal Profession is the General Council of the Bar pursuant to section 12(4) of the Legal Practitioners Act as amended by law No 21 of 1994.” He said.

However, he stated that the 2007 Rules was issued by the AGF as it confers more financial advantages on NBA.

“The 2007 Rules was issued by the Hon Attorney General of the Federation. Those who care to read the Rules can see the preamble to the Rules wherein it was expressly stated to have been issued by the Hon the Attorney General of the Federation.

“Because that Rules conferred more financial advantages on our Association NBA, nobody took my stand and few other lawyers serious when we spoke that the Rules was not issued in accordance with due process of law.” He said.

Furthermore, he stated that he was part of the people that led prosecution of unprofessional conduct of Lawyers.

“I recall Prof Ojukwu SAN speaking on this at one NBA functions. Under the 2007 Rules, I had the privilege to lead the prosecution of lawyers who committed Professional misconduct and some were debarred and some suspended from practice.” He said.

“As lawyers, we collectively led the office of the Hon the Attorney General of the Federation to believe that it has power and duty to issue the Rules. What is the hullabaloo on the alleged amendments said to have been made by the Hon the Attorney General of the Federation then for. Did we not use the old one made by the HAGF.” He added.

In addition, he stated that Lawyers have equally encouraged encroachment of powers in this regard.

“I read the statement of my very good learned friend Mazi Afam Osigwe. Beautiful. I respect his views. He captures well the position of law. But beyond this beautiful position of law, did we as lawyers, not the ones that has encouraged this usurpation of functions and powers over the years.

“Where were the eagle eyes of the legal profession gone to when the previous Rules that conferred a financial advantage on our Association was being used. Have we not over the years accepted as correct wrongs and rots in our profession.” He said.

“I do not want to think and believe that it is because the amendment if true is attracting our pious and eagle eyes now because it is likely to deny our association financial benefits.” He added.

Finally, he stated that members of the profession must be consistent in challenging illegalities.

“We must be consistent in what we do and challenge illegality and usurpation of powers even when such usurpation is to our professional Association advantage. It is then I can follow properly. For now we are estopped from challenging the power of AGF to issue us new Rules. Am just trying to make sense.” He concluded.

New People’s Constitution Through National Conference Is The Only Way Out From The Flawed Nigerian Constitution — Afe Babalola, SAN

0

Afe Babalola, the founder of Afe Babalola University, Ado Ekiti, says politicians are benefiting from the “flaws” in the 1999 constitution.

In an interview with TheSun, Babalola said because they are beneficiaries of the constitution, they would not be able to make proper amendments where necessary.

The 1999 constitution was drawn under the supervision of the military, and some of its contents were part of the draft constitution prepared under Sani Abacha, the late head of state.

The senior advocate of Nigeria (SAN) explained that the calls for the amendment of the constitution were not necessary, adding that what was needed was a sovereign national conference to produce a new constitution that would benefit the ordinary people.

“The only way out is not an amendment to the flawed constitution but a new people’s constitution through a sovereign national conference,” he said.

“The politicians who are in government, in the national assembly, and who are benefiting from the flawed constitution can never make any good and proper constitution for this country and no amendment can ever do so.

“In 1965, we had a house of assembly and the senate. Nobody earned salaries then; what they earned was sitting allowance.

“Look at the house of assembly, senate. Now, hardly will you find 50 people there in a day and they earn salaries. They even talked about pension. So, there is no way you can amend the constitution. They will make sure that they remain earning these billions of naira. We are the only country where people earn billions.”

According to him, the 1999 constitution was drafted to allow the “military to perpetuate themselves in power”.

“For example, Awolowo paid 55 percent of the revenue on education, knowing the importance of education. People saw themselves as Nigerians then. Unfortunately, the military came in 1966, jettisoned the constitution and ruled by decrees. When they were going away in 1999, they did not return us to the constitution which they suspended and then they brought their own constitution and presented it as constitution made by Nigerians. That was a lie; even right from the face of it, it was a lie,” Babalola said.

“Actually, the constitution they made was done in such a way that it will allow the military to perpetuate themselves in power, and that is why you find, all the time, those who are in the military were coming back in one form or the other. We have never had good government ever since.”

The lawyer said the only way Nigeria could get it right with its constitution is by calling for a “sovereign national conference”.

“The meaning of that is that whatever they decide will not be subject to amendments by these people,” he said.

“I have participated in many conferences and at the end of the day what comes out of it? They want to spend another N2 billion for amendment; what are you amending?”

COVID-19: Oxford To Resume Trial Of AstraZeneca Vaccine

0

The University of Oxford and AstraZeneca Plc have restarted a U.K. trial of an experimental Covid-19 vaccine after the study was halted over concerns about a participant who fell ill.

Oxford said in a statement that the U.K. regulator, the Medicines Health Regulatory Authority (MHRA), had recommended that the trials resume after an independent review of the safety data triggered a pause on Sept. 6. It declined to disclose any details about the participant’s illness.

“The U.K. committee has concluded its investigations and recommended to the MHRA that trials in the U.K. are safe to resume,” AstraZeneca said.

While temporary halts are common in vaccine trials, the interruption to the closely watched Astra-Oxford study had raised concerns about the viability of one of the fastest-moving experimental shots seeking protection from the pandemic.

The statements from Astra and Oxford on Saturday didn’t say anything about the status of tests outside the U.K.

AstraZeneca’s Chief Executive Officer Pascal Soriot said on Thursday that an independent safety review board was reviewing whether the participant’s illness had been caused by the vaccine or was unrelated. Oxford said some 18,000 people have received “study vaccines” as part of the trials.

“We cannot disclose medical information about the illness for reasons of participant confidentiality,” it said. “We are committed to the safety of our participants and the highest standards of conduct in our studies and will continue to monitor safety closely.”

Culled from https://www.bloomberg.com/

Prof. Odinkalu, Says Purported Amendment Of Rules Of Professional Conduct By AGF, Malami Fraught With Irregularity

0

Human Rights Activist, Professor Chidi Odinkalu has stated that the purported amendment of the Rules of Professional Conduct, 2007 by AGF, Abubakar Malami is done without the requisite power under the Law.

This is contained in a tweet which was sighted by TheNigeriaLawyer (TNL).

“Nigeria’s Attorney-General & Minister of Justice, @MalamiSan, claims to have amended Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) in the Legal Profession under powers conferred by s.12(4l) of Legal Practitioners Act. There’re no such powers? We have a HAGF (that) can’t do basic due diligence.

“The power to “prepare, and from time to time revise, a statement as to the kind of conduct which the Council considers to be infamous conduct in a professional respect” created in s.11(4) of the Legal Practitioners Act, belongs to the #Bar Council not to the HAGF.

“The #BarCouncil is a statutory body created by s.1 of the Legal Practitioners Act. It comprises 57 persons, made up of:
1. HAGF as president;
2. All state attorneys age metal
3. 20 reps of @NigBarAssoc.

“No meeting of the #BarCouncil has been called in order to amend the RPC

“The purported amendment of the RPC by @MalamiSan is as dud as a bounced cheque because:

1. He claims to have acted under a section of the law that gives him no such powers;

2. Even if he acted under the right provision, he can’t usurp the role of the #BarCouncil & he knows it!

“The only way to go is to totally disregard & ignore this alleged “amendment” by (AGF) @MalamiSan of the RPC. It does not exist & did not happen.

“It seems clear that @MalamiSan decided to go rogue on this – as on other things as he has on disobedience of court orders – because he knows that he can’t get his proposal through the #BarCouncil.

“Few tragedies are as awful as an attorney-general with no regard for law.” He said.

How J.S. Okutepa (SAN) Missed The Point On The Alleged Unilateral Amendment Of The RPC By The Hon Attorney-General Of The Federation (AGF)

0

(By Chief I. W. IDOWU)

My attention has just been. drawn to a news report titled,Condemnation Of Purported Amendment Of The Rules Of Professional Conduct By AGF, Malami, “Belated & Not Well Rooted In Good Faith”—J.S Okutepa, SAN” published by the TheNigeriaLawyer media platform. With the greatest respect to Mr. Okutepa, Nigeria lawyers are not estopped from challenging the action of AGF in this respect; Nigerian lawyers have no powers to amend, or to acquiesce to any violation of, any provisions of the Legal Practitioners Act (LPA), CAP L11, LFN, 200 or any of its successor-Acts, or amendment thereof. Only the National Assembly of the Federal Republic of Nigeria possesses the powers to amend or repeal the LPA, and until validly amended, all provisions of the LPA remain binding and enforceable.

Accordingly, where there’s any violation of the LPA, a court can set such violation aside by nullifying the offending action and declaring same null. The mere fact that Nigerian lawyers didn’t Challenge the RPC, 2007, purportedly made by the then Hon Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) does not in any manner detract from or diminish the powers of Nigerian lawyers to challenge any amendment purportedly, unilaterally made to the RPC, 2007, by the AGF in 2020, if such (the 2020) amendment is considered null. Even the RPC, 2007 itself may still be challenged as illegal and also set aside, if it was not properly made. No statute of limitation says that the RPC made in 2007 cannot be voided in 2020.

Let me now analyse Mr. Okutepa’s postulations and see to what extent any one of them may stand.

(1). The fact that J. S. OKUTEPA, SAN, a member of the General Council of the Bar(GCB), made the following declaration, has confirmed the claim by Nigerian lawyers, that the AGF did not call any meeting of the GCB before unilaterally amending the RPC, 2007: “This morning I woke up to read from social media that the Hon the Attorney General of the Federation has amended the Rules of Professional Conduct in the Legal Profession 2007.”

Meanwhile, I recall the earlier observation by another member of the GCB, Mazi AFAM OSIGWE:

“The twenty members representing the Nigerian Bar Association were elected at the Association’s Annual General Meeting held in Abuja on August 27, 2015. The Attorney General of the Federation has not convened a meeting of the Bar Council. The Bar Council has neither considered nor approved any proposed amendment to the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners 2007. Even though the Attorney General of the Federation is the President of the Bar Council, he cannot unilaterally exercise the powers of the Council.”

(2). Now, Mr. J. S. OKUTEPA, SAN agrees that “the appropriate organ saddles with the duty and responsibility to issue and make the Rules of Professional Conduct in the Legal Profession is the General Council of the Bar pursuant to section 12(4) of the Legal Practitioners Act as amended by law No 21 of 1994.” This means that the learned silk agrees that the AGF lacks the power to unilaterally make or amend the RPC, 2007.

(3). With due respect to the learned silk, it reasonably amounts to approbating and reprobating for the learned silk to turn around (as he has done) to describe “the condemnation by some legal Practitioners as belated and not well rooted in good faith.”

If the Hon AGF lacks powers to UNILATERALLY make or amend the RPC, then one may ask whether Mr. OKUTEPA, SAN’s declaration that “as lawyers, we collectively led the office of the Hon the Attorney General of the Federation to believe that it has power and duty to issue the Rules” can remove/erase the illegality inherent in the AGF’s actions in this respect. What is illegal is illegal and remains illegal and invalid, notwithstanding our own acquiescence to it. If the AGF lacks the powers to make or amend any RPC, any such action by the AGF remains illegal and ought to, not only be condemned, but should also promptly be set aside using the appropriate procedures and channels.

(4). This being the case, I hold the respectful opinion that Mr. OKUTEPA, SAN, completely missed the point when he issued the following query to Nigerian lawyers who are bitter and complaining over what they see an illegal action of the AGF: “What is the hullabaloo on the alleged amendments said to have been made by the Hon the Attorney General of the Federation then for? Did we not use the old one made by the HAGF?”

(5). Honestly, I had expected, that MR. OKUTEPA, SAN, should feel seriously concerned as a distinguished member of the GCB, whose lawful and exclusive authority and powers have been so unabashedly usurped by the unilateral action of the AGF in this respect. Besides, if it’s true that only the GCB can validly make or amend the RPC, then Mr. Okutepa, SAN, as a member or the GCB, should feel disrespected by the AGF’s action because, as I think, any disrespect or disregard for the GCB is gross disrespect/disregard for all its members, collectively and individually, including Mr. OKUTEPA, SAN. Every member of the GCB should indeed feel disrespected if it’s true that (1).only the GCB can make/amend the RPC and (2). The Hon AGF has now effected an amendment to the RPC, 2007, without first convening a meeting of the GCB to exercise powers that are exclusive to it.

The mere fact that the AGF is the president of the GCB doesn’t mean that the AGF can exercise the powers of the GCB. By law, only the GCB can exercise any lawful powers assigned to the GCB; Even if the AGF decides to exercise such powers on behalf of the GCB, he has an obligation to obtain the prior go-ahead of the GCB, which go-ahead may only be given at a properly convened meeting of the GCB. There is no evidence yet that the AGF had done any of these before purporting to amend the RPC, 2007.

(6). In view of the aforesaid, Nigerian lawyers have the responsibility of taking urgent steps to immediately reverse this desecration of rule of law as allegedly perpetuated by the Hon AGF! Illegality must not be condoned under any guise; one illegality tolerated begets multiple illegalities, until illegality overdoes us and becomes the rule, the norm, the necessary result of which would be doom and damnation, these in turn being the forerunners of chaos.

Chief I. W. IDOWU

thenigerialawyer

Absence Of Internal Democracy: Bane Of Party Politics In Nigeria

0

By Adebola Olarotimi Lema

Internal democracy otherwise known as shadow election is the process of governance within a political party. It is the ability of a political party to govern itself through its internal administrations, internal mechanism thereby enhancing greater good for itself and the country at large. The opposite of internal democracy is ‘imposition’ which creates dissention, disharmony, conflict, disagreement, dispute, intra party conflicts, threats to regime stability/good governance and disorganization in a political party.

The Electoral Act in an attempt to instill internal democracy in the political space and political parties provides in section 87 of the Electoral Act, 2010 (as amended): A political party seeking to nominate candidates for election under this Act shall hold primaries for aspirants to all elective positions; The procedure for nomination of candidates by political parties for the various elective positions shall be by direct or indirect primaries; A political party that adopts the direct primaries procedure shall ensure that all aspirants are given equal opportunity of being voted for by members of the party; A political party that adopts the indirect primaries for the choice of its candidate shall adopt the procedure outlined below; Where a political party fails to comply with the provision of this Act in the conduct of its primaries, its candidate for election shall not be included in the election for the particular position in issue.

To underscore the importance of internal democracy, I refer to the work of Babayo Sule titled ‘Internal Democracy and Nigerian Political Parties: The case of All Progressives Congress’, where he posits. “Internal democracy is an important principle in the operations and survival of democratic regime globally. Lack of internal democracy creates serious intra party conflicts which can likely threaten regime stability and good governance”.

The failure of political parties to adhere strictly to internal democracy is catastrophic and disastrous in that it had in the time past led to the breakup of political parties. An example can be seen in the Presidential primaries of the Peoples’ Democratic Party (PDP) in 2014 where the then President, Goodluck Ebele Jonathan was the sole candidate for the office of the President. Many of the party leaders, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar and seven (7) Governors were dissatisfied with the party’s decision and were forced to leave the party and initially formed the ‘nPDP’ before 5 (five) of them finally moved to the All Progressives Congress (APC). This action of PDP, the movement of its leaders and Governors actually cost the PDP the Presidency in 2015 and that singular act of breach of internal democracy will haunt the party for a long time. On the other hand, the observance of internal democracy by political parties helps the society to stabilize as can be seen in developed democracies of the United States of America, the United Kingdom and Ghana.
In APC v Marafa (2020) 6 NWLR (Pt. 1721) 385 at 433, the Supreme Court aptly stated the need for political parties to observe internal democracy in the conduct of their affairs when Hon. Justice Paul Adamu Galinje, JSC stated “The democratic system this country adopted was borrowed from the United States of America and other nations of Europe. Those from whom we borrowed this system are steadily forging ahead in all areas of endeavour in order to create a stress free and economically viable nations. For this great country, some politicians either are ignorant of what party politics is, or out of mischief, have continuously dragged this nation backward. If care is not taken this class of politicians will drag this nation to the Stone Age, where all of us will be consumed. I once again, as this court has consistently preached, urge this class of politicians to play the game according to law and guidelines which they themselves have enacted. It is only when this is done that sanity will take center stage in the domestic and internal affairs of this great nation”

The consequence of political parties failing to adhere strictly to internal democracy is grave and as succinctly put by Honourable Justice Paul Adamu Galinje, JSC in Marafa’s case above can damage the economy of a prosperous nation and reverses its fortunes and condemn it to return to the stone age.

Going historically, the carnage that started in Ondo State and spread to other parts of the South West in 1983 cannot be divorced from the allegations by Chief Akin Omoboriowo that the shadow election/primaries organized by his political party, Unity Party of Nigeria, was rigged in favour of the then incumbent Governor, Chief Michael Adekunle Ajasin. According to Lanre Akinsola, who writes by the pseudonym ‘Onigegewura’ in an article, ‘Thunderstorms in the West: The Story of How Ondo State Went Up in Flames’ “On November 11, 1982, the shadow elections took place in Akure. The Nomination Committee for Ondo State was headed by Chief Sebastian Umoren from Cross Rivers State. All the four members of the Committee were from outside Ondo State. This was understandably to ensure that none of the three candidates was unduly favoured. At the end of the day, Ajasin polled 707 votes, Omoboriowo scored 531 votes and Akintoye came third with 94 votes. These figures were however contested by Omoboriowo who claimed that his score was 532, with Ajasin and Akintoye scoring 479 and 94 votes respectively. With the result announced by the nomination Committee, Chief Ajasin was declared the winner and the party’s flagbearer for the Gubernatorial election in 1983. It is on record that following the shadow election, Chief Omoboriowo wanted to mend fences with his boss, the governor. He was however prevented from doing so by some members of his group. Chief Omoboriowo was now confronted with the task of choosing another platform to actualise his political ambition”

The abuse of internal democracy by political parties in Nigeria got to its peak in 2006 following the result of the Peoples’ Democratic Party Gubernatorial primaries in Rivers State where Rt Hon. Rotimi Chibuike Amaechi challenged the result of the said primaries which produced Mr. Celestine Omehia as the winner. Rt Hon. Rotimi Amaechi successfully challenged the declaration of Celestine Omehia by INEC and the Supreme Court (after the general election and upon swearing in of Celestine Omehia as Governor) declared him as the winner of the disputed PDP primaries and therefore the elected Governor of the State in the eyes of the law.

The above Supreme Court decision rattled many political parties in Nigeria because it was the first time an aspirant at the party’s primary who did not participate in a general election was declared the winner in the general election. The Supreme Court’s reason for declaring Rt Hon. Rotimi Amaechi as governor of Rivers State was hinged on the fact that the electorates voted for the PDP as a party in the Gubernatorial election in the State and whoever rightly won the party primaries earlier held was the person who won as Governor in the general election.

One of the major abuses of internal democracy relates to the substitution of the names of winners of the party primaries by the National Executives of the party who have the singular responsibility to submit names of successful candidates to the Independent National Election Commission (INEC). The Electoral Act has however come up with several amendments to curtail these excesses/abuses of the political parties by making it impossible for names of winners of party primaries to be changed except upon death and/or withdrawal of the candidate himself.

Another abuse of internal democracy by the political parties in Nigeria without exception is the issue of violence perpetrated by agents of the candidates, government agencies, security agents, political thugs and political parties. The issue of violence manifested in the 2019 Zamfara State’s APC Gubernatorial primaries. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) by its Guidelines directed that all political parties must do their primaries before the 7th of November, 2018. The All Progressives Congress in the first instance could not agree on the type of primaries, direct or indirect as provided by Section 87 (2) of the Electoral Act. The APC Ward, Local Government and State Congresses were conducted in violation of an order of the Federal High Court and the combined effect of which the ‘combatants’ were unable to agree on the form the party primaries should take and therefore were unable to hold any. Violence was openly threatened against the party’s Chairman (Adams Aliu Oshiomole) and the members of the Committee saddled with the responsibility to conduct the primaries. Eventually, there was no primaries and this scenario was what the Supreme Court referred to in the decision in APC v Marafa (supra).

In Rivers State, the All Progressives Congress could not hold its Ward, Local Government and State Congresses due to the raging internal conflict between the supporters of Rt. Hon. Rotimi Amaechi and Senator Magnus Abe. The party was therefore unable to conduct its Gubernatorial primaries and the end result was that there was no candidate for APC in the 2019 Rivers State Gubernatorial Election.

Recently, the Benin monarch, His Royal Majesty Omo N’oba N’Edo, Uku Akpolokpolo added his voice in condemning impunity, imposition and abuse of internal party democracy in a widely publicized Press release which the Cable news tagged “Godfatherism must end in Edo state”. The monarch stated as follows: “The Omo N’oba strongly advises that in order to eschew recurrent social political conflict that seems to constantly ravish the state, making Edo people a laughing stock to the rest of the country in how politicians manage the affaires of Edo people, our Edo political actors must eradicate the twin evil political vices of Godfatherism and consensus candidate. These two practices seem antithetical to the very fundamental basis of democracy”

As if the condemnation is not enough, Chief John Odigie Oyegun, former Governor of Edo State and the pioneer Chairman of the APC spoke truth to his political party in a press release tagged “BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE” on the 20th of June, 2020. In his exact words thus; “Unfortunately, what we have witnessed from our party is the steady erosion of even the very basic tenets of democratic principles in a manner that could turn our watershed victory of 2015 to the waterloo of our hard won democracy”.

One thing that is common to all the political parties in Nigeria is the lack of internal democracy. Both big and small political parties are guilty of abuse of internal democracy. One only gets to know and hear about these infractions because of the matters filed in Court by aggrieved members of the respective political parties. The sins in the smaller political parties are more and grievous but because they sometime hide the atrocities from the surface, an outsider may therefore not be in a position to know these and hear these infractions. Majority of the judicial decisions in Nigeria that reinforce and or strengthen internal democracy involved the big political parties of PDP (between 1999 and now) while for APC it became a national party just in 2015 and their sins are being made known now. Prior to 2015, there were less reported judicial pronouncements in AD, AC, ACN for abuse of internal democracy. However, from 2015, when the APC became a national party, it has witnessed the challenge of its primaries in court, the most prominent being the case of Zamfara State where Senator Kabiru Marafa successfully challenged the lack of internal democracy in the conduct of APC Primaries in 2019 as reported in the case of APC v Marafa’s case (supra).

On Sunday, the 30th of August, 2020, the Co-Chairman of the National Consultative Front ‘NCFront – a political group’, Professor Pat Utomi in a discussion on Channels television ‘Politics today’ said internal democracy is lacking in our political parties and that the political parties are private estates and investments of the political leaders.

To buttress the assertion that our political parties are an extension of private estates and investments of our political leaders I will share three instances that are recent both in PDP and APC. Firstly, on Monday, the 31st August, 2020, Senator Abiodun Olujinmi, the PDP senator representing Ekiti South Senatorial district at the senate accused the National leadership of the party of supporting the Ayodele Fayose faction of the party in Ekiti State on the parallel congresses conducted in the state. Apparently, Senator Olubunmi Olujinmi was referring to the parallel congresses conducted by two factions of the PDP in Ekiti State. If the above scenario is not nipped in the bud, two Governorship primaries will be conducted in the party as they prepare for their gubernatorial election in the state in 2021.

Secondly, the APC on Thursday, 3rd September, 2020 conducted its party primaries to fill the Imo North Senatorial seat which became vacant due to the demise of Senator Benjamin Nwajumogu who died on the 19th of December, 2019 as the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has scheduled the Imo North Senatorial Bye-Election for 31st October, 2020. Two primaries were held, one was conducted by a faction of the APC, and Frank Ibezim scored 13,637 votes to emerge Senatorial candidate which was supervised by the Chairman of the Election Panel, Senator Ajibola Basiru. Another faction held a different APC primary where Senator Ifeanyi Ararume was said to have polled 22,944 votes and was declared winner of the contest by a member of the Election Panel, Umar Gana. How did the political party get to a situation where two primaries are conducted for a single senatorial seat? Indiscipline and inconsistencies on the part of the leaders of the political party solely account for this. Though the party, through its deputy spokesman, Yekini Nabena, said the Senator Ajibola Basiru-chaired Election Panel is the duly appointed and legitimate panel empowered by the Party to conduct the exercise. Time will tell.

Thirdly, an incident happened in a political party I will not mention. An aspirant who did not win an election was declared winner because of his relationship to a party leader in the state. The aspirant who believed he rightly won the primaries but was not declared winner approached the Court on a pre-election matter. He was able to show to the Court that he was the legitimate winner of the party primaries with substantial documentary evidence that could not be impeached by the other aspirant, party and INEC respectively. This singular instance and many others show the extent of the damage that the leaders of our political party have done to internal democracy in the conduct of party primaries. The above instances go a long way to confirm the assertion of Professor Pat Utomi in the interview mentioned earlier.

In concluding this piece, I make bold to say that internal democracy will only become entrenched in our country when we have many members of the political parties like Rt. Hon. Chibuike Amaechi; Senator Kabiru Marafa and others (who are willing to challenge the deficiencies in the conduct party primaries and the arbitrary change in the result of party primaries). As postulated by Professor Pat Utomi, internal democracy is lacking in our political parties because our political parties are private estates and investment of the political leaders. To stop the hold of our political leaders on the political parties, I commend the advice given by Dr. Muiz Banire, Ph.d (former National Legal Adviser and former Chairman, AMCOM) to Nigerians, who have second or alternative addresses to get involved in our political parties. I am sure when this happens the political leaders who have pocketed the political parties would have a rethink and allow the political parties a fresh breath. The reason internal democracy is sidestepped in our political parties and our polity today is because the godfathers in the political parties determine what happens and majority of the party members are not exposed or majority of them are the less privileged/educated in the society like bricklayers, carpenters, mechanics, market women, National Union Road Transport Workers (NURTW), Road Transport Employers Association of Nigeria (RTEAN), Student activists etc while our professionals watch from the sideline. I am of the view that until there is a change of attitude, the politicians and party leaders who have held the political parties as private estates and investment will not yield their grip. I therefore add my voice to the voice of Dr. Muiz Banire, Ph.d, that professionals and those who have second or alternative addresses should get involved in our political parties to achieve a better result and by extension a better nation.

ADEBOLA O. LEMA ESQ is a Lagos based Legal Practitioner and Managing Partner of Fountain Court Partners. [email protected]

Despite prompt response by security forces, 62 years old widow, another burnt to death in Kaduna as Abuja is hit

0

▪︎ Those rescued by bandits attack in Abuja were those let go by bandits; Police say they rescued them after gun duel

In fresh killings by alleged Fulani militia, a 62 years old widow and mother of six, and another 52 years old mother of eight have been burnt to death in the latest in a string of killings and attacks in a week in Southern Kaduna.

According to the Southern Kaduna Peoples Union (SOKAPU, the killing of the women took place early Friday morning at Manyi-Mashin village, in Zamandabo ward, in Atyap Chiefdom, Zangon Kataf Local Government Area (LGA) in Southern Kaduna.

The Kaduna situation is coming as a source told Everyday.ng that those allegedly rescued by the Police in Abuja, after bandits stormed a large community in Abuja, were actually those released by their abductors on account of age “or because they did not appear commercially viable”.

According to the source who resides in the community, the bandits operated unchallenged for hours, moving from house to house robbing the people and taking along others.

The incident in Tunga Maje community that borders the famous Abuja-Lokoja expressway, just a stone throw from Zuba has sent chills down the spine of many Abuja residents, who recall a viral Nigeria Customs Service intelligence memo that revealed the influx of bandits into forests in Abuja and contiguous states of Nasarawa and Kogi.

The Defence Headquarters was quick to reassure residents of the territory of its readiness to protect them, as the intelligence community lashed out at the Customs service for its indiscretion. But an attack, robbery, and abduction in a community that borders the Federal Capital City, just 50 kilometres from the city centre is raising fears that the leaked NCS memo was genuine, contrary to attempts by the NCS to discredit it later.

Anjuguri Manzah, the Federal Capital Territory Police Command spokesman, tells a different story from those of Tunga Maje residents.

While assuring residents that protection of lives and property remains the core of its policing mandate, he pointed out that when the Police received a distress call on kidnap of some persons on Thursday night, a joint team of Police operatives from the Command Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS), Rapid Response Squad and Zuba Police Division responded swiftly to the occasion.

“During a fierce gun confrontation with the heavily armed hoodlums, the Police team successfully rescued five of the kidnapped victims.

“Meanwhile, a concerted effort has been deployed to rescue the remaining five victims that are still with the hoodlums who escaped into Niger state through a nearby forest that is surrounded by rocky terrain”, Manzah said.

On Kaduna, SOKAPU’s spokesman, Mr. Luka Binniyat alleged that the community was invaded by hordes of Fulani armed men who burnt down almost all the houses in the village, looting and carting away valuables.

“Two persons were burnt in their homes beyond recognition: They are Cecilia Ishaya, 62, a widow and mother of 6 children and Iliya Sunday, 56, who left behind 8 children. Though men of Operation Safe Heaven promptly responded, the militia fled before their arrival.”

Police confirmation of the tragedy is still being awaited.

Binniyat adds in a statement: “This was after Fulani militia on the 8th September, 2020 laid ambush for three Atyap youths from Atakmawei village in same Zamandabo Ward in Atyap Chiefdom, as they went to clear weed in their Sugar cane farm about a kilometer from their village.

“Suddenly, armed herdsmen came from hiding and struck. They descended on them with daggers and machetes. Anthony Magaji, 25, a final year HND student with Nuhu Bamali Polytechnic, Zaria, was hacked down. They axed his neck and head with macabre wounds and killed him instantly. Isaac Thomas, 24, also an OND student of the same School, managed to escape with life threatening injuries and is now under intensive care in a hospital, while the third escaped with less injury.

“Meanwhile, we have received complains of farmers in Gora axis of Atyap Chiefdom, who say that Fulani men occasional sneak into their farms destroy large swath of growing food crops, thus leaving them with a bleak prospect of hunger in the near future. All these gory development is taking place after a much publicized peace deal was reached between natives of Atyap Chiefdom on one side and their long time settled Hausa and Fulani representatives on 23rd August, 2020 in Unguwan Wakili, close to Zangon Kataf town.

“Similarly, on the 8th of September, 2020, an attack was launched again by Fulani militias at Kitsarapang village in Kizachi Chiwo of Kizachi community, Tsam Chiefdom in Kauru LGA in the Southern part of Kaduna state, Nigeria.
The attack claimed the life of Emmanuel David Yohanna, 13 leaving two persons grievously with gunshots. They are: Sunday Zango Stephen, 48 and Zakka John, 23

“The two victims are now receiving treatment at a Hospital in Jos.

Meanwhile, three decomposing corpses were found on Kaduna-Abuja highway on Sunday, 6th September, 2020. They were among four persons that were abducted during a brazen operation last week at Maraban Rido, a suburb of Kaduna under Chikun LGA all in Southern Kaduna. They were killed after ransom was paid for their release. Among them is Pius Gargai, 20, and married with a child. He was a nephew of the 1st Vice President of SOKAPU, Mr. Dio Maisamari. The young man was buried last Wednesday in his native home Kufana, Kajuru LGA. The names of the other victims are yet to reach us.

“These bring to eight the number of our members grisly killed by armed Fulani militia within five days in Southern Kaduna in an ongoing genocide against the natives of Southern Kaduna.

“SOKAPU wishes to once again request the Federal Government, through Operation Safe Heaven, under the Command of Major General Chukwu Emeka Okonkwo, to expatiate action and expel and bring to book all the Fulani militia that are currently occupying 101 Southern Kaduna Communities in four of our LGAs. We have furnished the world with the details and we are happy to note, that eight of the displaced communities in Zangan District in Kaura LGA are now returning home as a result of more presence of men of OPSH.

“We are appealing to our youths to shun all forms of provocation and conduct themselves in manners that will not make them fall short of the law, (while) not compromising their rights for self-preservation under the law”.

(Opinion) Covid-19 pandemic and the Nigerian tax policy responses

By Oluwole Osagie–Jacobs

It is common knowledge that the Nigerian economy is passing through perilous times. The economy which is the engine of the government has dipped precipitously due to the significant drop in the international price of crude oil and the COVID19 pandemic. Statistics from the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) as at September 9th, 2020 shows that there are 55,456 confirmed cases of COVID19 in the country, 43,337 have been discharged and 1,067 are dead. The country has had to lock down, thereby shutting down business activity significantly.

The economy now plods on listlessly with no redemption in sight. The cost of basic necessities like food, clothing, healthcare, education and shelter has gone up. This has sent ripples of discontent among the people as their ability to meet financial obligations has been severely undermined. Private businesses have been severely deflated. Advanced economies are not spared. The omnipresent virus has laid them prostrate. The whole world is under captivity. The pains endured are so chronic and virulent that I now better appreciate the reverses suffered by Job in the bible.
In response to the harsh economic condition now experienced by Nigerians, the government through the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) has come up with a lot of tax incentives to cushion the harsh effect of the economic meltdown on the citizens. A tax incentive has been defined as “a form of a reduction of or an exemption from, the tax which somebody or an organization would normally be liable”. It should be recognized that high level of inflation currently endured by the citizenry is an unplanned taxation. This has been made known by the American economist, Professor Milton Friedman (1912 – 2006), in his famous statement that “Inflation is the one form of taxation that can be imposed without legislation”. Therefore, tax incentives whose goal among others is to attract investment, increase employment, raise capital transfer, increase economic growth, must in addition decimate inflation.

Perhaps the most far reaching palliative is the taking away of about 60% of the tax base by the Finance Act, 2019. The Act excludes companies with less than N25 million turnover in a year from tax. The implication is that about 60% of those who should pay tax will not do so. Also, about 60% of people who are supposed to act as agents for the remittance of Value Added Tax (VAT) monthly are relived of this duty. Companies in this bracket include a large number of Small and Macro enterprises. We must commend the government for this concession because from my over thirty years experience in audit assurance this is a palliative overdose. The truth is that only few of Nigerian businesses preparing accounts for tax purpose disclose a turnover of above N25 million.

Many of these companies don’t prepare accounts for auditing. Those who prepare accounts do so because they intend to participate in the bidding for government contracts. This Act has excluded from tax payment about 90% of the traders in Alaba market in Lagos, Onitsha market, Ariaria market, Aba and the big merchants in kano. They will only be liable to rates and levies.

The Finance Act, 2019 reduced Company Income Tax rate to 20% for companies with a gross turnover of above N25 million but below N100 million. This is a big relief to companies covered by this provision.
The Service has eased the burden of the payment of Stamp Duty on rent as such payments are now graduated with minimal rates. For example, if the tenure of a rent is between 1to7 years, the rate applicable is 0.78%. It means for a rent of N100,000 per annum the tenant will be liable to pay  N780 only. You are not going to pay Stamp Duty on your own house if you live there. The payment is to legalize the Agreement between you and your landlord. Furthermore, the service has announced plan to give relief to individuals who should pay Stamp Duties on rent to corporate organizations and promised to extend this to the jurisdiction of states’ Internal Revenue Service.

The furor which arose after the announcement of Stamp Duty on rent payment was unfounded. Stamp Duty came into effect vide Ordinance 41 of 1939. It is payable in respect of dutiable instruments like MoUs, Agreement Contracts, Receipts, Promissory Notes and Insurance policies.

An incentive on the filling of returns is the Late Returns Penalty waived for taxpayers who paid early and filed later. This allowed supporting documents to be emailed to dedicated addresses or submitted later to the tax offices by those who are unable to use the email facility.

Remittance of VAT on or before the 21st of every month was extended to the last day of the month. Taxpayers who earned their income in Naira or Dollar are required by law to pay their liabilities in the same currency the income was earned. For good measure, the FIRS offered a palliative to taxpayers who earned their income in Dollars and faced challenges in sourcing for forex to offset their tax liabilities. They were given the option of paying in Naira at the prevailing Investors’ and Exporters’ (I &E) Forex window rate on the day of payment.

In respect to tax Audit, Investigations and Monitoring, visits were suspended till June, 2020 and all interest and penalties on additional tax liabilities which arose as a result of desk review, tax audit and investigation were waived provided the tax liabilities are paid on or before the 31st of August, 2020.

To encourage Agricultural Production a new tax regime of eight years tax holiday has been instituted to encourage crop production and animal husbandry.

Other incentives include the following: the exemption of Personal Income Tax in respect of gratuities payable to an employee in the private sector in respect of services rendered by him under a contract of service with his employer; and the exemption from Capital Gains Tax on the sums obtained by way of compensation for loss of office, except where the amount of such compensation or damages exceed N10 million in any year of assessment.
It is rather unfair to allege that the FIRS is apathetic to the pain and suffering of Nigerians and businesses operating under the current economic situation. It should be noted that Nigeria is the largest economy in Africa but in terms of Tax to GDP ratio, Nigeria is among the least in Africa. The figures for some African countries are: Algeria (35%), South Africa (29%), Ghana and Kenya (18%).  That of Nigeria is as low as (6%).

An analysis of the telecoms industry now trending on social media is both confounding and revealing. It would be noted that the same Nigerians shying away from tax payment hold 250 million active SIM cards. About 72 million Nigerians recharge their cards every day.  Nigerians spend about N446 billion to recharge their cards in a month. Nigeria’s investment in the telecoms industry in a year is N21.4 trillion. The Nigeria Communications Commission (NCC) says Nigerians spend more on telecoms than on health and food. The amazing thing is that most of these GSM activities by Nigerians are very unproductive.

The FIRS has expressed confidence that the above incentives together with those in the Finance Act, 2019 would aid economic recovery and stimulate growth of Nigerian businesses during and post COVID 19. It is therefore expected that Nigerians will take maximum advantage of these incentives.

▪︎ Osagie – Jacobs JP, FCA, is an economist and a chartered accountant. He can be reached at [email protected]

Nigeria becoming a failed state, divided under Buhari – Obasanjo

0

▪︎knocks FG for mismanaging nation’s diversity, economy

▪︎ says N’Assembly’s constitution review a waste of money

▪︎We expect OBJ to act like statesman –Buhari Media Organisation

Former President Olusegun Obasanjo says Nigeria is slowly becoming a failed state and a basket case that urgently needs to be pulled from the brink of collapse.

He said this in Abuja on Thursday while delivering a speech titled, ‘Moving Nigeria Away from Tipping Over’ at a consultative dialogue attended by various socio-cultural groups including Afenifere, Middle Belt Forum, Northern Elders Forum, Ohanaeze Ndi Igbo and Pan Niger Delta Forum.

Obasanjo, who played an active role in the Nigerian Civil War, said he had never seen Nigeria so divided, adding that many of the problems plaguing the country today were due to the recent mismanagement of Nigeria’s diversity.

The former President said, “I do appreciate that you all feel sad and embarrassed as most of us feel as Nigerians with the situation we find ourselves in. Today, Nigeria is fast drifting to a failed and badly divided state; economically our country is becoming a basket case and poverty capital of the world, and socially, we are firming up as an unwholesome and insecure country.

“And these manifestations are the products of recent mismanagement of diversity and socio-economic development of our country. Old fault lines that were disappearing have opened up in greater fissures and with drums of hatred, disintegration and separation and accompanying choruses being heard loud and clear almost everywhere.”

Obasanjo said those beating drums of war and calling for secession must remember that were Nigeria to break into several countries, the citizens would still be neighbours and would need to interact with one another.

He stated that if Nigeria was to successfully tackle its challenges, it must first address the problem of disunity because a house divided could not achieve much success.

The former President, therefore, commended all socio-cultural groups present at the meeting, describing their agreement to come together as a good sign.

He added, “With what I have seen, read and heard from the rapprochement that you are forging together, I see a ray of hope that Nigeria can be saved from disintegration.

“If we are ready to live together in understanding, mutual respect and love with equity, justice, inclusiveness while engendering sense of belonging and unity of purpose and all hands on deck, we can deal with internal issues of terrorism, organised crimes, banditry, kidnapping, human trafficking, drug, money laundering and corruption. We will then be able to deal successfully with any incoming attack of terrorism, organised crimes, etc; from outside.”

Obasanjo described the National Assembly’s fresh constitutional review exercise as a waste of time and resources.

He subsequently praised socio-cultural groups like NEF and Yoruba Summit Group for describing it as such.

Obasanjo said, “That ray of hope was somewhat manifested in the last 10 days or so when the Northern Elders Forum and Yoruba Summit Group complemented each other in their separate press releases on the Senate’s idea of inviting submissions from Nigerian public for constitution amendment which had been regular money-gulping activity by every National Assembly session since 1999, a veritable source of waste without end.

“I believe one of our major problems in the past was that we did not dialogue enough, we talk at ourselves and selfishly keep old prejudices and biases. If we show understanding, give-and-take, love of one another and commitment and love of the country, we will do what is right and stand firmly together for the good of all.”

He said he was optimistic that the consultation among the several groups would enlarge the circle from the mini-dialogue group bit by bit until a national dialogue that could save Nigeria from disintegration was reached. When that is done, he said the initiative would come to an end.

The former President said only self-deluded people would claim that all is well in Nigeria.

He said, “I believe Nigeria is worth saving on the basis of mutuality and reciprocity and I also believe it can be done through the process of dialogues rather than talking at each other or resorting to violence. It will amount to dangerous and destructive self-delusion for anybody to claim that all is well in Nigeria today.”

He stated that rather than work on fixing the country and ensuring that grievances among several units within the country are addressed, some are fixated on the 2023 Presidential election.

Obasanjo added, “Some people are obsessed with 2023, I believe that with death, destruction, debt, disease, deceit, disbelief, disenchantment, doubt and suspicion around, we need to see our way through to 2023 and beyond in some form of unity of purpose, reasonable security, shared values, true democratic practice, inclusiveness and shared society. That is why we are here. No constitution is even permanent; it is dynamic with time and experience.”

Speaking with Saturday PUNCH on Friday, Afenifere Chieftain, Ayo Adebanjo, said the consultative forum had become necessary due to the myriad challenges facing the nation.

He said the resolutions of the 2014 National Conference ought to be implemented rather than have a fresh constitutional amendment exercise that would gulp money and fail to address pressing issues.

Meanwhile, a communiqué issued by Ambassador Ahmed Magaji at the end of the forum stated that the Chairman, Nigeria Governors’ Forum, Dr Kayode Fayemi; the Chairman of the All Progressives Congress Governors Forum, Atiku Bagudu; and the Chairman of the PDP Governors’ Forum, Aminu Tambuwal, had been briefed on the activities of the forum.

It read in part, “The participating organisations are committed to supporting and themselves in all activities targeted at improving the Nigerian constitution for the purpose of meeting the yearnings and aspirations of all Nigerian citizens.”

The meeting agreed to set up panels of experts to discuss, address and make recommendations on about seven subjects, including Nigeria’s federal structure and devolution of power, responsibilities and resources; security; electoral reforms and ensuring the integrity and credibility of elections; local government autonomy and effective administration; the economy and fiscal federalism; judicial reforms and other matters central to the survival of Nigeria.

The Chairman of the Buhari Media Organisation, Niyi Akinsiju, said Nigerians would expect people like former President Olusegun Obasanjo to behave like a  statesman and not join a class of elites who complain because their selfish material interests were not being “serviced.”

Akinsiju said this while responding to comments attributed to the former Nigerian President, in Abuja, on Friday.

He said “ One would expect people like former President Obasanjo to behave like a statesman and not serve as a distraction.

“The Nigerian political elite complain just like he is doing now when their personal interests are not being serviced.

“President Muhammadu Buhari is doing what every sensible leader should do – put the interest of the majority of Nigerians first.  Most of our fault lines which Obasanjo is talking about today are creations of the selfish interests of the elite which have no economic consequences. Most of our elite advance these fault lines to further their interests.”

He said elite from all tribes in Nigeria are responsible for the current state of affairs in the country. Akinsiju insisted that Buhari was moving Nigeria in the right direction.