Home Blog Page 980

CBN Freezes Baba Ijebu, Other Companies’ Bank Accounts

0

The Central Bank of Nigeria has frozen the bank accounts of 38 Nigerian companies.

This is as scarcity of dollars at the parallel market during the week forced the naira down to N465 against a United States dollar.

Nigeria is presently facing one of its biggest dollar crunch in recent years with the impact hurting critical sectors of the economy.

In a circular dated September 4, Bello Hassan, CBN’s Director of Banking Supervision, asked banks to place the accounts of the 38 companies on Post-No-Debit (PND) order

“You are hereby required to place the under listed accounts on Post-No-Debit with immediate effect and revert with the account names, numbers, currencies and balances of all accounts placed on PND.

“Note that only the listed entities should be placed on PND, all related accounts are excluded. Your response should be forwarded to the underlisted email addresses [email protected] or [email protected],” part of the circular read.

Among the companies listed by CBN is Premier Lotto owned by Adebutu Kessington, Nigerian billionaire known as Baba Ijebu.

The move by the apex bank comes months after the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission launched an investigation into the activities of Adebutu for alleged tax fraud and economic sabotage.

According to PREMIUM TIMES, Segun, one of Adebutu’s children and other management officials of Premier Lotto were in January detained at the EFCC office in Lagos.

According to officials of the commission, the investigation was as a result of a petition submitted by Western Lotto, another betting company run by late Buruji Kashamu.

PREMIUM TIMES quoted EFCC sources as saying that they had identified N5bn revenue that should have been remitted to the Nigerian Government but was allegedly kept aside by the company.

The probe might be expanded to include other betting companies and investigate claims of sharp practices and how some firms allegedly withhold funds from winning customers.

Use Of Commercial Papers In Company Financing In Nigeria

0

By Uche Matthew

A Commercial Paper (CP) is an unconditional promise by a person to pay to the order of another person a certain sum at a future date. Such an instrument may or may not carry the bank’s guarantee. Where the bank guarantees the CP to make it more marketable in the money market, the instrument acquires the force of a BA and the bank incurs a contingent liability. Where the CP is not secured 4 or guaranteed by the bank (clean CP), it needs not be reported as a contingent liability.

OTHER DEFINITIONS
• An unsecured, short-term debt instrument issued by large banks and corporations, typically for the financing of account receivable, inventories and meeting short term-liabilities. They are usually issued at a discount from face value and reflect the prevailing market interest rates. Maturities on commercial papers rarely exceed 270 days
• A short-term debt financing securities (no longer than 270 days in tenor) consisting of unsecured and discounted promissory notes issued by large corporations with good credit ratings, which can be readily traded
In simple terms, companies borrow money from the public by issuing commercial papers. It is essentially an unconditional promise to pay back your money on an agreed future date with interest.

FEATURES
• WHO CAN ISSUE: Only financially secure and highly rated organizations can raise money through commercial papers. New and moderately rated organizations are not in a position to raise funds by this method.
• DISCOUNTED INSTRUMENTS: A commercial paper is similar to Treasury bills due to the fact that it is a discounted instrument (interest is paid upfront) and is usually tax free. They usually reflect the prevailing market interest rates, meaning that they borrow at a lower rate than is offered at the bank. The key difference between Treasury bills and commercial papers is that the former is issued by the Federal Government while the latter is issued by corporations. That means commercial papers are a bit more risky than Treasury bills. Consequently, commercial papers often attract higher returns compared to government issued securities.
• ACCREDITED INVESTOR: Investment in commercial papers is open to accredited investors. An accredited investor is any person or institution capable of understanding and affording the financial risks associated with acquisition of unregistered securities. This means you understand what you are doing (financial education) and can handle the risk if things do go otherwise. The accredited investor includes qualified institutional investors or an eligible individual investor. An eligible individual investor, or accredited individual investor is:
(i) Any person who alone, or with a spouse has a net worth of over N2m
(ii) Any person who alone had income in excess of N400, 000 in each of the two most recent years (or with a spouse, in excess of N500, 000 during this period) and had a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year (annual income).
• MATURITY: They are usually short-term securities. Maturities on commercial papers rarely exceed 270 days
• CENRAL REGISTRATION: All CPs issued in Nigeria shall be registered with the Central Securities Clearing System (CSCS), which shall serve as the custodian of all issues. The CSCS shall also serve as a central depository for all dematerialized instruments.
• REGULATION: Investment in commercial papers is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, quotation of commercial papers on FMDQ Platform (financial market daily quotes) is a rigorous process that involves credit rating etc. This is to protect the investing public and create confidence in the market. Since commercial papers are listed on FMDQ, you can buy and sell them on the platform.
• UNSECURED SECURITIES: Commercial papers are not usually backed by any form of collateral, making it a form of unsecured debt. It is regarded as unsecured because it does not have a bank guarantee in the event of default. As a result, only firms with high-quality debt ratings will easily find buyers without having to offer a substantial discount (higher cost) for the debt issue. Commercial papers that come with bank guarantees are called bankers’ acceptance.
• CONSUMER SECURITY: Companies seeking funds through issuance of commercial papers cannot afford to default. It would severely impact their credit rating and limit their ability to access funds in future through issuing commercial papers or other financial institutions.
• The proceeds from this type of financing can only be used on current assets, or inventories, and are not allowed to be used on fixed assets, such as a new plant, without SEC involvement.

LEGAL FRAMEWORK- CBN GUIDELINES
CONDITIONS FOR CREATING A COMMERCIAL PAPER

I. A Commercial Paper qualifies as a financing vehicle under these guidelines if:
(a) The issuer has 3-years audited financial statements, the most current not exceeding 18 months from the last financial year end; and
(b) The issuer has an approved credit line with a Nigerian bank acting as an issuing and payment agent (IPA), where the bank guarantees the issue.
II. Investors in CPs shall be made aware of the identity of the issuer.
III. CPs shall only be guaranteed and not accepted since the intermediating bank is only a secondary obligor.
IV. When a bank invests in a CP by disbursing its own funds, the transaction shall be reported on balance sheet and treated as a loan. However, if the bank merely guarantees the instrument, it shall be shown off-balance sheet as a contingent liability.
V. Resale of CPs by banks/discount houses shall be accompanied by adequate documentation which should be provided to Examiners on request.

DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL PAPERS
The standard documentation requirements for a CP transaction in Nigeria shall include:
(a) CP raising mandate
(b) Board Resolution to borrow
(c) Issuing, placing and paying agency agreement
(d) Commercial Paper Note
(e) Bank Guarantee, where applicable
(f) Investment Instruction/Investment Mandate
(g) Investment Advice
(h) Custodial Agreement
(i) Information memorandum on the issuer in the case of clean CPs
(j) Latest rating report from the credit rating agency
(k) Backstop loan request for guaranteed CPs

RATING REQUIREMENTS FOR CP ISSUES
(I) Either the issuer of a CP or the specific issue itself shall be rated by a rating agency registered in Nigeria or any international rating agency acceptable to the CBN. An indicative rating must have been obtained by the issuer at the time of submission of the declarations and information to the Central Securities Clearing System (CSCS).
(II) The issuer or the issue shall have a minimum of investment grade credit rating (BBB- or similar rating).

TENOR AND ROLLOVER OF CPS
(I) The CP shall be issued for maturities of between 15 days and 270 days, including rollover, from the date of issue.
(II) Every issue of a CP is therefore, a separate CP.
(III) The capitalization of upfront interest and discount on maturing Commercial papers into a rollover is not allowed.
PROCEDURE FOR ISSUANCE OF CPS
(I) Any company proposing to issue CPs shall submit a proposal to the IPA with its rating report issued by a credit rating agency. The IPA, on receipt of the proposal, shall scrutinize same and, on being satisfied, take the proposal on record or record the proposal in its blotter.
(II) Companies shall ensure that the proposed issue of CP is completed within the period of two weeks from the date of opening of the issue for subscription.
(III) After the exchange of deal confirmation between the IPA and the issuer, the IPA shall issue physical certificates to the investor or arrange for crediting the CP to the investor’s account with the depository.
(IV) All IPAs issuing the CPs shall, within three working days from the date of completion of issue, advise the depository on the amount of CPs actually issued.

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PARTIES TO CP ISSUANCE ISSUER
With the simplification in the procedures for CP issuance, issuers shall now have more flexibility. Issuers shall, however, have to ensure that the guidelines and procedures laid down for CP issuance are strictly adhered to.

ISSUING AND PAYING AGENT
(I) IPA would ensure that issuer has the minimum credit rating as stipulated by the CBN and amount mobilised through issuance of CP is within the quantum indicated by the guidelines for the specified rating. 14
(II) IPA shall verify that all documents submitted by the issuer viz., copy of board resolution, signatures of authorised executants (when CP is in physical form) are in order. It shall also ensure that it has a valid agreement with the issuer.
(III) Original documents, or certified true copies thereof, verified by the IPA should be held in its custody.

PROVISION OF STAND-BY FACILITY FOR CPS
I. Banks and DHs shall have the flexibility to provide for a CP issue, credit enhancement by way of stand-by assistance/credit backstop facility, etc., based on their commercial judgment and as per terms prescribed by them.
II. However, these should be within the prudential norms as applicable and subject to specific approval of the Board.

DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
I. The bank shall fully disclose the issuer risk in the placement memorandum.
II. CP are only redeemable at maturity, as such cannot be pre-liquidated.
III. The investor in a CP may rediscount the paper with the bank before maturity at new market terms if the bank is willing to purchase the risk.
IV. Banks shall expressly state in customer advice/correspondence the difference between bank deposits and clean CP investments as well as highlight the underlying agreement that the bank is not obliged to pay at maturity until the issuer redeems the paper.
V. Investment instructions in CP shall be received from the customer before transaction is booked.
VI. Acceptable channels of communication include:
(a) Logged/recorded telephone conversation
(b) Email from official corporate email addresses
(c) Letter signed according to existing mandate
(d) SWIFT
(e) Bloomberg, Reuters

VI. Every issue of CP, including renewal, shall be treated as a fresh issue.

PENALTY FOR NON-COMPLIANCE
Non-compliance with these guidelines or any part thereof shall attract appropriate penalties as prescribed in Section 60 (1) of the Banks and Other Financial Institutions Act 1991 (as amended) and may also include debarring from the BA or CP market, or as may be prescribed by the CBN from time to time.

WHY NIGERIA IS NOT BEING OCCUPIED NOW

0

If you are persuaded about the prices of petrol, rice, etc, and exchange rate under President Goodluck Jonathan in 2015 compared to what is obtainable under President Muhamadu Buhari in 2020, then you fail to realise that if the former was still in power today, the situation may not be significantly different.  The difference would be that Nigerians will find the situation so hard to bear that a real revolution would have commenced in Nigeria. Interestingly, such revolution may have even been financed by some of those in power now (also part of those in what has become Nigeria’s power recycling game).

President Muhammadu Buhari came in 2015 when Nigerians were desperately in need of change and fought hard for it. He is still here and many of the problems are still here with us—insecurity, poverty, poor electricity supply, bad roads, poor healthcare, unemployment, etc., and corruption being at the helm of all these. The problems of Nigeria are so huge. Perhaps PMB sincerely believed he could bring the much-desired change. But no. Fairly, we reckon with some of his efforts but because these do not touch on the perennial problems of the country as highlighted above, they do not ring loud bells—and no bells at all for others.

Before PMB became President, he was one of those who led the crusade of belief that all Nigeria’s problems could be solved from the centre at Aso Rock. Oftentimes, this belief tends to shield governors who may be corrupt and incompetent and are happy to conveniently hide under the overshadowing figure of Aso Rock, thus continue to fail to help the Federal Government to bring dividends of democracy to the States and grassroots.

No sooner than later President Buhari arrived, we saw that, just like in the times of the Israelites, the messiah is yet to be born and that we remain where we were. This discovery has weakened and disenchanted many, shutting their mouths and shrinking their weight to occupy Nigeria now. Unlike President Jonathan’s era when all manner of criticisms were largely tolerated, this current dispensation, by a number of the actions by its actors, has shown low tolerance for criticisms, whether objective or otherwise. Any (unguarded) utterance against the actions and policies of the current administration might earn you the unsolicited visit by what some Nigerians have described as “the Black Ninjas”—the triple or double “S” squad. (SSS or DSS). Lagos which served as the headquarters and controlling unit of the Occupy Nigeria Movement now has the same party as the state ruling at the Centre. Many of the voices springing from its Islands are now perhaps already occupied, reaping the fruits of their earlier crusade. Others have drowned in the lagoon of fear, while a few others have their voices swallowed by faintness. And there are many others who keep breathing deep with foreboding.

What I foresee

It will take time before the weight to occupy Nigeria would be regained. I foresee that when that weight is here, Nigeria will be so occupied that it would be difficult to disperse. True compatriots shall arise and the call for salvation will be compelling. They will move to save our Fatherland. And they may not even have to be in power themselves, but allow Nigerians who will serve the Nigerian people with love, strength, and faith, do so democratically. To understand this, recall that we profess daily that the labour of our past heroes shall not be in vain. This creed will be a propelling force.

The God of all creation will be with them to direct their noble cause and to lead them aright. The truth will be revealed to our youths in a practical manner they will comprehend it. Peace and justice will be restored, and prosperity will colour our flag.

Stephenlegal

(Opinion) Blasphemy is plural

0

By Frank Tietie

I respect the name of the Holy Prophet of Allah. I have been taught so and I have also witnessed the consequences of mentioning it without due regard.

Nduka Obaigbana, Thisday Newspapers and the Nigerian government have learnt a lesson in that regard and they have one to tell for the reckless and casual reference to the name of the Holy Prophet by that Nigerian newspaper.

The spontaneous reactions of those who hold the name of the Holy Prophet so dear can have very sure and crucial consequences. Therefore it is considered by non-moslems to be a very sensitive matter.

The message that the name of the Holy Prophet must be accorded full reverence has been made quite clear by His followers to non-moslems in quite unmistakable terms and that has come to be respected by all, including the government, the people and Nigerian law.

On the other hand, the Lord Jesus Christ is declared by the Holy Bible as the Saviour of mankind. He lived and died on earth, a propitiatory death, as the typical sacrificial lamb of God that was slain and His blood was used in spiritual symbolism to wash away the past, present and future sins of all those who might believe and accept such claims as made by His disciples, thereby assuring such believers a heavenly place of eternal bliss for their disembodied souls when they die and cease to be earthlings.

The Holy Bible and Christians declare that His name, the name of Jesus commands the highest authority in the spiritual realm and at its mention, the devil flees, miracles happen, prayers are answered and there are deliverances. What a name! The wonderful name of Jesus!

Yet when the name of the Lord Jesus Christ is used in ribald jokes by ingenious Warri comedians, nobody gets bothered. Even His so-called followers pay stupendous amounts of money to laugh at such jokes. They don’t get angry but secretly, they think within themselves that if the Lord Jesus Christ actually feels offended by the abuse of His name by comedians, He should fight for Himself, after all, He is Lord of the heaven and the earth.

Some of the leaders of the followers of the Lord Jesus Christ have formed and belong to certain groups like Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) and Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria (PFN).

Whenever the name of the Lord Jesus Christ is abused and misused by the likes of Warri based comedians, these leaders of CAN and PFN don’t get angry or charge at the government to invoke Sections 210 -213 of the Penal Code, with regard to offences relating to religion. They often remain calm and consider themselves to be religiously and politically correct so long as the finances of the Church of Jesus Christ are not touched or affected.

So which is more important? The name of the Lord Jesus Christ or the money belonging to His Church?

I have come to see a recent trend where some of these church leaders have become so insensate about the public abuse of the Lord’s name that they have now begun to invite these comedians to their churches in order to swell their throngs.

Meanwhile, there is a usual strange fury and righteous indignation by these church leaders against anybody or thing that touches or threatens to touch church money. But there is a cold peace whenever the name of the avowed owner of the church money is blasphemed.

A denominational pastor once told me that church founders are prepared to forgive any sin or offence except that concerning church money. So I have seen church founders pursue their employee-pastors, seize all their property and arrest them with police for failing to account for church money yet such vehement resolve is never expressed in calling for public respect for the name of the Lord Jesus Christ.

I circulated a video to over 5000 persons on my WhatsApp broadcast list where a cadet instructor was sacreligiously using the name of the Lord Jesus to beat an applicant in the head with a stick in a diabolic manner. To my surprise, after about an hour only two or three Christians decried the mention of the Lord’s name in that kind of drill. All the other commentators of the Christian faith, only saw the human rights dimension of the abusive drilling of the cadet.

As a student of religion and a seeker of spiritual release myself, I know the efficacy of the power of the name of the Lord Jesus Christ when done in faith. Therefore, I appeal to His vicars here on earth to stand up more for His name and not for His money.

Without resort to extremism, there is nothing wrong in ensuring that the same regard and reverence that is accorded to the name of the Holy Prophet in the public national life of Nigeria should also be accorded to the name of the Lord Jesus Christ.

What is blasphemous to one faith should be blasphemous to all faiths because blasphemy is plural.

  • Tietie, a human rights lawyer, writes from Abuja, and sent this via WhatsApp

(Opinion) The crude arithmetic of dishonest petroleum pricing

0

By Farouk Adejoh-Audu

In January 2012 international crude price had stabilized at $140…Jonathan’s government declared it was removing subsidy and NNPC announced a new pump price of N97 which led to widespread protests code named Occupy NIGERIA.

The protest shut down the country but Lagos, specifically Ojota was the epicentre.The usual activists were on ground. And for the first time it was obvious the vocal community was parting ways with the Jonathan goverment they helped birthed right from when their agitations forced the hands of the National Assembly into invoking the “Doctrine of Necessity” to the 2011 Elections that officially enthroned him as president.

Buhari up to that point a serially defeated presidential contestant quickly cashed in on the nationwide protest and declared that government’s claim of removing subsidy as dishonest because, as he fiercely argued, there wasn’t any subsidy at the then prevailing price of N65 pump price to be removed.

“Anybody who says he’s subsidizing anything is a fraud “
Buhari said. (https://youtu.be/y7nNWw_lXDk)

But the government of the day sustained the new price regime after reducing the initial price from N97 to N87 naira.

To show honesty of purpose the SURE-P Fund was established to warehouse the difference of between what would have been paid as subsidy and the pump price to be used for infrastructure mainly in the transport sector. Monthly this SURE-P fund was paid to the three tiers of government and the fund was sustained all through until the governed was kicked out in the 2015 Election.

By 2016, the international price of crude had been on a steady decline averaging at about $50 or even less. At times coming as low as $20 per barrel (pb). That was when the present goverment of the man who claimed there wasn’t any subsidy to be removed at a pump price of N65 against international crude price of $140 pb now came to announce they were removing subsidy and instantly announced a pump price of N145!

No protests. The vocal activist community retreated. The NLC called for industrial action and demonstrations, but both flopped monumentally. The politically correct mantra and answer to the bewildering volte face was : ” I Stand With Buhari “

This week, the government has announced a new price regime of petroleum products and the action is again being defended as “removal of subsidy” and “deregulation”. It is explained that because the international price of crude had risen again there was a need to mark up prices to conform with the international price. Beside, goverment they said, had totally deregulated thus the pricing is at the mercy and pleasure of the dealers and marketers.

I guess the “I stand with Buhari” crowd have lapped up all these and they are aggressively pushing the narrative of the advantages of deregulation and removal of subsidy. Good, but there are begging questions of simple arithmetic.

If at international crude price of $140 pb a pump price of N87 has nothing to do with the removal of a “non-existent” subsidy but dishonesty and fraud on the part of the former government how come N162 pump price from a crude price of $40-$45 reflects genuine subsidy removal and deregulation?

And if at N87 pump price from $140 the previous government made savings, infact profit to share SURE-P funds across the tiers of government how do we explain the regime of N162 pump price from $40 pb as deregulating?

A simple arithmetic will indicate that if product sold at N87 per litre at crude price of $140 at between $40 -$45 the price should be at about N27. 20 to N27.36. But if we decide to factor in the then exchange rate and today’s exchange rate which is about 120% increase against the naira, it should fetch a maximum pump price of N65. 66.

The above calculations is using the Jonathan template of N87 against $140pb with excess funds redistributed as SURE-P.

Now let’s imagine the Buhari “no subsidy at N65 from $140”. Using the current $40-$45 pb x120% currency differential will fetch a maximum of N23.14.

I do not pretend to be an economist or mathematician or even “arithmetician” so I will gladly welcome any logical presentation that will repudiate this layman analysis using the same stat or if it can be proven that there are better and more accurate data than the ones available to the public which I have used here.

I’m waiting.

▪︎ Mr. Adejoh-Audu, a former journalist, lives in Abuja and sent this material via WhatsApp

EFCC Chair Renews Call For Special Corruption Courts.

114

Acting Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, (EFCC), Mr. Umar Abba Mohammed, has renewed calls for the establishment of Special Courts to try corruption cases.

He made the call in Abuja on Friday while receiving members of the Monitoring Committee of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act( ACJA), who paid him a working visit.

 According to him, the only means of minimizing delay in the trial of cases, is to establish Special Courts to try financial and economic crimes. “Delay of cases in court is a challenge to us. This challenge can be addressed if there are Special Courts handling corruption cases”, he said.

Mohammed appreciated the Committee members for their efforts in monitoring the compliance of law enforcement agencies with ACJA, stressing that the EFCC was complying adequately with the Act. He specifically addressed the Commission’s detention facilities, describing them as world class. “ Our detention facilities are world class. Many suspects prefer to be remanded in EFCC custody than in any other place”, he said.

The ACJA Monitoring Committee’s delegation was led by Magistrate Chukwuemeka Nweke. Their brief, according to him, was to assess the level of compliance of law enforcement agencies with ACJA. “ Our visit is to smoothen the progress of synergy between prosecution agencies and the judiciary”, he said.

Nweke further stated that his Committee had the responsibility of preparing and submitting an Annual Report of criminal justice administration in Nigeria. Series of deliberations were made between the Committee members and management staff of the EFCC, led by Umar.

The EFCC’s Chair spoke extensively about the difficulties of getting remand warrants in the Federal Capital Territory, appealing to the Committee members to press for a review of a decision against such warrants. He equally deliberated on leakage of information by court staff and bankers to criminals, saying that such a practice should be checkmated. “ Tip-off of criminals by court staff and bankers are not healthy developments. They should be checked”, he said.

The Committee members were later taken round the Commission’s detention facility at its Corporate headquarters, and they expressed satisfaction with the state and sophistication of the facilities.

Everyday

BREAKING: Pharmacist Detained For More Than Six Months Over Twitter Comment Against President Buhari

0

Lawyers have described the charges of “terrorism, sedition, criminal intimidation of the President, and threat to life of the President” against Akuma as baseless.

pharmacist, Solomon Akuma, is currently in the detention of the Nigeria Police Force and has spent more than six months in custody for allegedly making a social media post against President Muhammadu Buhari and his late Chief of Staff, Abba Kyari.

The pharmacist spent almost three months in detention without a court order or trial until he was eventually arraigned at the Federal High Court for charges bordering on terrorism, sedition, criminal intimidation of the President, and threat to life of Buhari. 

The court denied his bail application, effectively confining Akuma to detention of over 150 days now and still running. 

The next adjourned date for his trial is October 7, 2020.

Lawyers have described the charges of “terrorism, sedition, criminal intimidation of the President, and threat to life of the President” against Akuma as baseless.

Also, the pharmacist’s detention for close to three months without a court order or arraignment negates the provisions of the Nigerian constitution. 

The Buhari government is notorious for clamping down on voices of dissent, shrinking the civic space, disobeying court orders and violating citizens’ fundamental rights.

Saharareporters

FG expresses interest in Russia’s COVID-19 vaccine as it lands in Nigeria

105

It appears there is light on the horizon in the global efforts to contain the spread of COVID-19 through vaccine.

For instance, Russia has produced a vaccine in which the Nigerian government has expressed interest.

Minister of Health, Dr. Osagie Ehanire received samples of the vaccine from the Russian Ambassador to Nigeria, Alexey L. Shebarshin in Abuja on Friday.

Details of the meeting are accessible on the twitter handle of the Federal Ministry of Health.

Ehanire expressed Nigeria’s interest in the Russia’s COVID-19 vaccine.

He said: “We are exploring all knowledge in terms of therapeutics and vaccines.

“We are expressing our interest for the COVID-19 vaccine so that we will have the opportunity to work elaborately.”

Executive Director, National Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA), Dr. Faisal Shuaib, in his remarks, stated that this opportunity would help to strengthen the collaboration between Russian and Nigeria.

“We are at a point where we have a joint venture with the private sector,” he said.

Dr Adepimpe Adebiyi, Director, Hospital Services Department said that it was an opportunity to expand the nation’s vaccine production.

According to him, “The technical officers will inter-phase with the Russian team in order to strengthen the relationship between Nigeria and Russia.”

UPDATED: First international flight lands in Lagos as Nigeria opens airspace

0
Airport Reopening: First International Flight Lands in Lagos

Amid pomp and ceremony, the first international flight landed at the Murtala Muhammed International Airport, Lagos, on Saturday, thus signaling the opening of the nation’s airspace.

This came about five months after the closure of the Nigerian airspace due to lockdown occasioned by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The aircraft operated by Middle East Airlines touched down at the Murtala Muhammed International Airport, Lagos, at exactly 02:27 pm.

Meanwhile, the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) has provided further reports on the first international flighf to land in Lagos.

It said that the Middle East Airline (MEA) aircraft, which took off from Beirut, Lebanon, was ceremonially welcomed with a water cannon demonstration by the officials of the Aerodrome and Rescue Fire Fighters, a Department in the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria (FAAN).

NAN also reports that officials of FAAN, Nigeria Immigration Service (NIS), Port Health Services (PHS), Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) and other relevant agencies were on ground to attend to the passengers brought in by the airline.

On arrival at the terminal, passengers presented their documents, including COVID-19 PCR test results for screening by the Port Health Services officials, while their travelling papers, passports and visas were handled by the immigration officials at the airport.

However, there was no much work to be done by the officials on ground as the aircraft landed with just 200 passengers as approved by the Presidential Task Force (PTF) on COVID-19.

The passengers, comprised Nigerians and foreigners, conducted themselves orderly and went through the protocols as approved by the PTF.

At the arrival and departure halls of the airports, the arriving and departing passengers observed the social distancing protocols, just as it was being currently observed on the domestic routes.

Speaking on the procedures, Mr Abdullahi Usman, Comptroller, NIS, MMIA, said the process was seamless and passengers were cooperative while travelling documents were requested from them by the officials.

Usman explained that on arrival, Nigerians onboard need not to fill another travel card, saying that when necessary; the immigration service would give them the right form to fill.

He said: “As you can see, the passengers are coming in quantum, not in a mass.

“The control of the passengers start from the disembarkation of the aircraft and you can see it yourself how orderly things were done.

“The procedures remain the same. Social distancing is there. Nigerians have no need to fill another card.

“Once we have any other information to get from them, we will give them another card. We want to ensure seamless passengers clearance at the counters.”

Also, Mrs Victoria Shin-Aba, Regional Manager, South-West, FAAN, expressed gratitude to the Federal Government and the management of FAAN for ensuring smooth return of flight services on the international scene. (NAN)

Ghana to consider legislative diplomacy in resolving trade dispute, says Ghana’s President Akufo-Addo

▪︎As Gbajabiamila makes case for amendment of Ghana’s GIPC Act

The President of Ghana, Prof. Nana Akufo Ado, has assured the Speaker of Nigeria’s House of Representatives, Femi Gbajabiamila, of the readiness of the Ghanaian lgovernment to consider the resolutions reached at the “Legislative Diplomacy Bilateral Meeting” between Nigeria and Ghana’s senior legislators on 2nd September 2020, at the Ghanaian Parliament House.

The Ghanian President gave the assurance when the Speaker of Ghana’s parliament, Prof. Mike Oquaye, upon completion of the 2-day extensive dialogue, led his Nigerian counterpart on a courtesy visit to the President at the Jubilee House, Accra, Ghana on Thursday.

The legislative diplomacy dialogue became imperative as the parliaments of the two countries sought modalities to resolve challenges and provide an enabling business environment for foreign traders including Nigerians doing business in Ghana.

Several foreign businesses, many Nigerian-owned, in Ghana have been facing challenges following the demand for $1m capital base for foreign traders, as enshrined in the Ghana Investment Promotion Center GIPC Act (2013).

Responding to a request by Nigeria’s Speaker, Femi Gbajabiamila, for a review of the Ghana Investment Promotion Centre (GIPC) Act to make certain concessions, President Akufo-Addo said the request was in order as it “makes a lot of sense”.

The Ghanaian President, who expressed satisfaction with Gbajabiamila’s visit, endorsed his proposal for the establishment of a “Nigeria-Ghana Business Council” established by law in both countries, and he additionally suggested the setting up of a joint ministerial committee between the countries that would “shepherd” issues between Ghana and Nigeria.

He told Gbajabiamila he would also raise the issue with President Muhammadu Buhari “when they meet at the ECOWAS Summit on Monday.”

“I think the way forward, which is really what matters in situations like this, that is being suggested, one that I find very acceptable, the idea of legislation, a Nigeria Ghana business council that will superintendent trade matters and investment matters between our two countries, maybe long overdue.

“The time has come for us to take these worthwhile steps. I suggested to Mr. President that it will be a good idea to set up a joint ministerial committee of ministers from both sides who will be responsible for shepherding Ghana and Nigeria issues, reporting to both presidents at any one time, and that is how they should be resolved.

“I am hoping when I see him on Monday for the ECOWAS summit, we can advance these discussions and come to a final conclusion.

“The way you yourselves have come about this matter is very satisfactory, and it requires our support. The review that you are asking for, why not? if it works in our mutual perspectives, we can take it for granted that your request will be taken seriously. We will have a look at it.

“So, the request for the review makes a lot of sense,” President Akufo-Addo said.

Earlier, Gbajabiamila, who was in the company of some of his colleagues in Nigeria’s House of Representatives, which included the Chairmen of House Committees on Foreign Affairs, Media and Public Affairs , Deputy chairmen of committee on Diaspora , Federal road safety and a member of the ECOWAS Parliament, told the Ghanaian President at the Jubilee House, that they were in Ghana to make efforts through parliamentary diplomacy to resolve the issues at stake.

“We have appealed to the (Ghanaian) Parliament that if it’s possible at all to look again at the issues, as far as the Ghana Investment Promotion Center Act is concerned, they should please do so.

“If it is not possible, then let us look at ways the pain can be reduced, like those expectations required in the law.

“We’ve proffered a few suggestions one of which is the establishment of Ghana Nigeria Business Council backed by legislation on both sides,” Gbajabiamila said.

Meanwhile, in a communique issued jointly at the end of the bilateral meeting between members of the two Parliaments led by their respective Speakers, Gbajabiamila and Prof. Mike Oquaye, it was resolved that “measures will be adopted to support law-abiding traders to properly regularise their business operations to alleviate the trade challenges occasioned by the alleged closure of the retail stores, in view of the ravaging impact of Covid-19 pandemic on businesses and families in both countries.”

They acknowledged that many stakeholders in the retail sector had limited appreciation of the trade laws of Ghana, in particular, Section 28 of the GIPC Act, which provides for the conditions under which non-Ghanaians can engage in trading activities and urged the relevant regulatory authorities including the GIPC and Trade Attaches of foreign missions to educate their citizens on the trade laws.

They equally emphasized the need to respect the sovereignty of Member States of ECOWAS and their laws but, in doing so, efforts must be made to ensure that the ECOWAS Agenda for free movement of people and goods in furtherance of a shared and prosperous future of citizens of the sub-region is not compromised.

“A meeting will be held between the Trade and Foreign Affairs Committees of both Legislatures to deliberate on applications of Trade Laws, in particular, the GIPC Act, 2013 (Act 865) and make recommendations for appropriate solutions; and

“A Joint Committee will be established composed of Members of both Legislatures to explore the possible passage of reciprocal legislation, which could be potentially called the “Ghana-Nigeria Friendship Act” which shall propose “Ghana-Nigeria Business Council” to provide a framework to sustain the friendship and benefits to citizens of the two nations.”

On departure from Ghana yesterday, Gbajabiamila expressed his gratitude to his counterpart for his statesmanship, leadership and hospitality, which made it possible for both countries to resolve thorny issues through legislative diplomacy.

Theconclaveng