Home Blog Page 966

Presidency to Soyinka: Nigeria has always been divided

0

The Special Adviser on Media and Publicity to the President, Femi Adesina, said this administration inherited a “terribly” divided country from former President, Goodluck Jonathan, in 2015.

Adesina, speaking on Channels Television’s “Politics Today” on Wednesday, insisted Nigeria had always been divided.

He spoke in response to well publicises comments made by Nobel Laureate, Prof. Wole Soyinka while backing another former President, Olusegun Obasanjo on the issue.

According to Adesina, “Nigeria had always been divided. Always. Right from amalgamation in 1914, Nigeria has always been divided.

“Nigeria is an inconvenient amalgamation but we have worked at it and I tell you that there is no time in the history of this country that the country was not divided but then we had kept at it and we were trying to make it work.

“As of 2015, when President Buhari came, Nigeria was terribly, terribly divided; divided along religious lines, divided along ethnic lines; divided along language, divided hopelessly, terribly and that is the division that the President had been working at. But you see that a lot of people instead of letting harmony return to this country, thrive and luxuriate in widening the gulf. They play politics with everything.”

It is official: In Kaduna; rape, lose your organs, die or spend your lifetime in jail!

0

Well, in Kaduna, the government has put its surgical knives where its mouth is: a man rapes, gets convicted, and if he does not appeal, he becomes a eunuch and ends up in prison for life, or die! What a clinical finishing to a heinous crime

The female convicts don’t go free. On conviction, for the offence of rape of a child, the Court shall punish the accused with Bilateral Salpingectomy and death.

Many men have often complained they were raped by aunties, househelps, and others as children, but official complaints have been hard to come by in this area, researchers say.

In the bill signed into law by Governor Nasir el Rufai, it is quite simple: it states, “Whoever commits rape of a child below the age of fourteen (14) years shall on conviction, be punished with Surgical Castration and death.

“Whoever has sexual intercourse with a male child below the age of fourteen years shall be punished with surgical castration and death.

Even rape of an adult, in this case above 14 years of age, leads to castration and life imprisonment in the law el Rufai signed on Wednesday.

“Where the convict is a child, the Court shall order as appropriate under the Children and Young Person Law Cap 26 Laws of Kaduna State 1991.

“Where the victim is a child, the Court shall in addition to the conviction, order that the convict be listed in the Sex Offenders Register to be published by the Attorney General.

“Where the Court is trying the offence of rape involving a child below the age of fourteen years, corroboration of a medical report shall be necessary. The Kaduna State Penal Code (Amendment) Law 2020 amends the Penal Code Law (No.5) of Kaduna State, 2017 by substituting section 258 as follows…” (everyday)

Video shows Kainji Dam washing away cattle, farms but ICRC says it not collapsed, intact

0

A viral video has shown live cattle and farmlands being helplessly washed downstream uncontrollably by flood many allege arose from a break in one of Nigeria’s oldest hydroelectric power dams, Kainji Dam.

But managers of the dam say it is not because of a collapse.

The Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission (ICRC) confirmed that the integrity of Kainji Dam is “intact and that the facility is operating flawlessly”.

The confirmation is contained in a statement signed by Mr Chidi Izuwah, Director-General and Chief Executive Officer, ICRC on Tuesday, in Abuja.

Izuwah said that the attention of ICRC was drawn “to very dangerous fake news circulating about Kainji Dam”.

“As part of the Power Sector reforms Kainji Hydro-power Facilities were concession-ed to Mainstream Energy Solutions.

“Mainstream’s responsibility include safe custody of the entire dam structure and appurtenances.

“The ICRC, being the statutory agency responsible for pre and post contract regulation of Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) and concessions, has continued regular technical and other compliance monitoring of the Kainji Concession.

“The ICRC wants to confirm that the integrity of Kainji Dam is intact and the facility is operating flawlessly and injecting lowest cost power to the national grid,” he said.

Izuwah said ICRC conducted a compliance monitoring visit before the COVID-19 pandemic on the dam and all aspects were inspected and tested.

“We thoroughly inspected the Dam Crest, Reservoir, Embankment Rip Rap, Dam Toe, Toe Drain, Piezometers, Spillway, Stilling Basin, Power House etc.

“Furthermore Kainji has one of the most sophisticated real time inflow prediction and reservoir basin management systems.

“This computer based system, with feeder monitors on the upstream and downstream stretches, is designed to ensure world class hydraulics flow management for dam, upstream and downstream safety management.”

The director-general further explained what an embankment collapse of the dam meant and its implications for the nation.

“Kainji Dam impounds over 16 billion litres of water. Embankment collapse means the dam structure is breached leading to loss of containment of the impounded water.

“Embankment collapse will result in what is called a dam break wave.

“Most empirical hydraulic models will show that everything probably some decent distance on both banks of the niger from kainji dam location to the sea will be washed away.

“A dam break wave is very similar to a Tsunami wave but is not of seismic origin.”

He added that an embankment collapse of the dam would “probably be the biggest disaster to hit Nigeria”.

Izuwah further assured Nigerians that Kainji was safe and advised them to ignore the fake news on the dam.

“We advised all Nigerians to please kindly check the status of our PPP and concession projects on the ICRC disclosure portal or directly with the Commission.”

▪︎ Additional reports by NAN

11,500 people sign petition asking EU, UK to bar Kaduna Gov. El-Rufai

0

Amid reports that the United States Government has placed a visa restriction on Kaduna State Governor, Nasir el-Rufai, at least 7,000 people have signed a petition calling on the United Kingdom and the European Union to follow suit.

The petition, which was initiated by a former Presidential aide, Reno Omokri, on Tuesday, was addressed to the UK Parliament, the UK Prime Minister, Boris Johnson; Council of the European Union and the European Parliament.

Checks by BarristerNG on Change.Org showed that the petition had hit 11,500 signatures as of 3:39 pm on Wednesday.

Omokri, who initiated the petition, accused el-Rufai of being a threat to the peace and security of Nigeria for many reasons.

He noted that on December 3, 2016, the governor admitted that he paid herdsmen who had been accused of killing several persons.

“Since that admission, there has been an intense escalation of the killings of mostly Christians in Kaduna, and on August 25, 2020, suspected herdsmen abducted seven schoolchildren and their teacher from Prince Academy, in Kaduna. They have not been seen or heard of since then,” Omokri said.

Omokri, who was a social media aide to former President Goodluck Jonathan, said el-Rufai on January 27, 2013, insulted Jesus Christ on Twitter

The petition further read, “On February 6, 2019, he threatened foreign observers, including observers from the EU and UK with death, warning that they would return in body bags should they intervene in Nigeria.

“On July 15, 2012, Nasir El-Rufai said, and I quote ‘We will write this for all to read. Anyone, soldier or not that kills the Fulani takes a loan repayable one day no matter how long it takes.’ This threat has been carried out in Southern Kaduna where there is an ongoing genocide of Christians under el-Rufai’s watch.”

Omokri said on August 23, 2019, the governor charged the Anglican Bishop of Zaria province of Kaduna, Abiodun Ogunyemi, for defamation.

“On April 24, 2019, another of his sons, Bashir el-Rufai, described the pogrom against Igbos as sweet.

“It is for this reason that Nigerian citizens call on the government of the United Kingdom and the European Union Presidency to follow the lead of the United States and place a visa ban on Nasir El-Rufai, who is scheming to become Nigeria’s President, to prevent a Rwandan style genocide in Nigeria,” he said.

Attempts to get a response from the governor’s office proved abortive as his Spokesman, Mr. Muyiwa Adekeye, rejected calls and had yet to respond to a text message as of the time of filing this report.

The Nigerian Bar Association had last month invited el-Rufai to speak at its Annual General Conference but the NBA later withdrew the invitation amid several petitions.

The governor has been accused of mismanaging the diversity of Kaduna State which has led to the killings of hundreds of persons mostly in Southern Kaduna.

He was also accused of human rights abuse including ensuring the prolonged and illegal detention of government critics.

HOME OWNERSHIP: CBN introduces construction facility

0

By Elizabeth Adegbesan THE Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, has introduced a construction finance facility to enable Family Homes Fund Limited to implement the federal government’s Social Housing Programme as part of its Economic Sustainability Plan 2020. The Programme aims at speeding up the deployment of 300,000 homes in the 36 states of the federation. In its Framework for the Implementation Of Family Homes Financing Initiative, the apex bank stated: “Mass housing construction is among the key economic activities with potential to create a significant number of jobs rapidly. By Clever Advertising “It is in the light of this that the Bank introduces this financing initiative to support the Federal Government’s Economic Sustainability programme to fast track the deployment of 300,000 homes in the 36 states of the federation and the Federal Capital Territory and to create up to up to 1.5 million jobs in 5 years. READ ALSO: Buhari to CBN: Don’t give Kobo for food, fertilizer imports “This initiative is to be implemented in collaboration with Family Homes Fund Ltd as the lead developer.” On funding, the CBN said that Funds would be released to FHF on project basis subject to the cumulative maximum limit of N200 billion. The facility is a term loan of not more than 5.0 percent per annum with a three years tenor from the date of disbursement, which the CBN said, will enable FHF to finance the construction of social housing units for low income people.

vanguardngr

Bill Gates Sr, Father Of Microsoft’s Co-Founder, Passes Away At 94

0

William H. Gates snr, a lawyer raised in the Great Depression who helped his son give away an immense fortune, has died. He was 94.

He died on Monday at his beach home on Hood Canal, Washington, according to Bill Gates III’s family office. The cause was Alzheimer’s disease.

Gates saw his middle child grow from a headstrong boy to one of the most admired business leaders of his generation who became the world’s second richest person, with a net worth of more than $US123 billion ($168 billion), according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. When Bill Gates started giving away the billions he’d made as co-founder of Microsoft, he turned to his father to advise his charitable foundation.

“I never imagined that the frequently argumentative little boy I faced each night at dinner, the one eating my food and using my name, was to be my future employer,” Gates said in a 2003 speech to fellow members of Rotary International, a worldwide service organisation.

For their earliest philanthropic endeavours in the 1990s, the elder Gates worked from a basement office at home or, as a British newspaper reported, from the vinyl booth of a burger joint where he often ate lunch.

Funding pleas
The William H. Gates Foundation, started in 1994 with an initial stock gift of $US94 million, concentrated its giving on global health and community groups in the Pacific Northwest. The elder Gates scanned pleas from the serious to the whimsical. One man suggested funding a ballroom dancing television channel, he wrote in his 2009 memoir, “Showing up for life.”

The elder Gates operated the slide projector at his son’s first keynote address at the Comdex trade show in Las Vegas, in 1983.

In the book, he also recounted getting an appeal from his son and his son’s wife, Melinda. They had learned that many children die each year from illnesses that are rarely fatal in developed countries, such as measles, malaria and diarrhoea. “Dad, maybe we could do something about this?” they wrote.

The foundation, now known as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, has committed more than $US50 billion to expand childhood immunisation, eradicate polio, provide seeds to African farmers and improve American public schools, according to its website. The elder Gates served as one of the foundation’s co-chairs, along with his son and daughter-in-law.

“We have to be helpful to each other or it would be an impossible world,” he said in a May 2009 interview with the Seattle Times. “This is not only good religion but very practical for economy and humanity.”

Ballmer connection
Earlier, he played a role in the development of Microsoft, the world’s largest software company.

Over dinner in 1980, he helped his son recruit a friend from Harvard University, Steve Ballmer, to work for Microsoft. Ballmer left graduate school and later became chief executive officer of the Redmond, Washington-based company.

The elder Gates operated the slide projector at his son’s first keynote address at the Comdex trade show in Las Vegas, in 1983. “Without me, you wouldn’t be here,” he joked at one meeting of Microsoft employees.

William Henry Gates II was born November 30, 1925, in Bremerton, Washington, an hour’s ferry ride from Seattle. He said in his memoir that he learned his work ethic from his father, who owned a furniture store in a town hit hard by the Great Depression.

Eagle Scout
With his Boy Scout troop, Gates felled trees and worked two-man crosscut saws to build a lodge in the woods. He became an Eagle Scout.

He enlisted in the US Army during World War II in 1944 and served in Hokkaido, Japan, and Tokyo after the Japanese surrender.

Returning to Seattle, he attended the University of Washington under the GI Bill and received a law degree in 1950. While there he asked a university friend, Mary Maxwell, to set him up with one of her sorority sisters — preferably a tall girl, because he stood 2 metres tall. Mary, at 1.67 metres, stood on her tiptoes and suggested herself, Gates recalled in his memoir.

They married two years later. In addition to the son they called “Trey” — for William III, his name before father and son became simply snr and jnr — the couple had two daughters, Kristianne and Libby.

Their son’s intellectual intensity and headstrong nature at times led to a battle of wills, Gates wrote.

Parental discipline
Once, the younger Gates dawdled in his room as the family waited in the car. His mother asked what he was doing. “I’m thinking, mother,” he replied, according to his father’s recollection. “Don’t YOU ever think?”

On another occasion, the future software mogul, then 12, got so nasty with his mother that his father threw a glass of cold water in his face, according to an April 2009 Wall Street Journal article. “Thanks for the shower,” young Gates replied. His parents took him to a counsellor, who advised them to give the youth more freedom.

Later, the young Gates demonstrated his first commercial software, a program to measure traffic that he wrote with his friend Paul Allen, at the kitchen table.

The elder Gates built his law practice at the Seattle firm that became Preston Gates & Ellis LLP, then part of K&L Gates LLP. Among its clients was Microsoft, which Gates’s son founded with Allen in 1975.

Aside from his law work, Gates served as a trustee for more than two dozen Pacific Northwest groups, including the Greater Seattle Chamber of Commerce and King County United Way. In recent years, he was also lent his name to proposals for higher estate and income taxes. Voters rejected a state income tax initiative he supported in 2010.

Mary Gates died of cancer in 1994. The elder Gates married his second wife, Mimi Gardner Gates, the former director of the Seattle Art Museum, in 1996.

Bloomberg

Fmr NBA 2nd VP Ubani, Challenges Unilateral Amendment Of RPC, Drags AGF, Malami To Court

1

The former 2nd Vice President of the Nigerian Bar Association, Monday Ubani Esq, files an action in court challenging the unilateral amendment of the rules of professional conduct for lawyers by the Attorney General of the Federation.

In a suit, commenced by Originating Summons, the former 2nd Vice President of NBA, and a human rights activist, based in Lagos, is challenging the powers of the Attorney General and Minister of Justice of the Federation, as the president of the General Council of the Bar, to unilaterally make and or amend the rules of professional conduct for lawyers.

In the said Originating Summons, filed by the human rights activist, he is seeking the determination of the following questions by the Federal High Court:

  1. Whether given the combined provisions and proper interpretation of sections 6(6b), 36(1) and Section 251(q&r), of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999, as amended, section 23A, of the Legal Practitioners Act, which prohibits and removes the right of action or access to court by any person with respect to the management of the affairs of the Nigerian Bar Association, is not inconsistent with the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, as amended.
  2. Whether by a community reading and proper interpretation of the provisions of sections 1(1&2) and 12(4) of the Legal Practitioners Act, which created and donated to the General Council of the Bar, the powers and responsibility of making rules of professional conduct, for the legal profession, the 1st Defendant, in its official capacities, as the Attorney General and Minister of Justice of the Federation, and or as president of the General Council of the Bar, can unilaterally, alter, amend and or make any Rules of professional conduct, without a proper meeting of the General Council of the Bar, duly convened, and notices thereof, issued to other members of the General Council of the Bar.
  3. Whether given the community reading of sections 1(1&2) and 12(4) of the Legal Practitioners Act, the Attorney General of the Federation, is given any powers to unilaterally make rules of professional conduct or to amend the existing rules of professional conducts for lawyers in Nigeria.

The following reliefs were also sought before the court:

  1. A DECLARATION, of this honourable court, that the provisions of section 23A of the Legal Practitioners Act, as amended, is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, as amended, and therefore null, void and of no effect whatsoever, to the extent of its inconsistency with the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, as amended.
  2. AN ORDER of this honourable court deleting or expunging section 23A, of the Legal Practitioners Act, as amended, for being inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, as amended.
  3. A DECLARATION that the Attorney General of the Federation, lacks the capacity, powers or vires to unilaterally make, amend and or alter the provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct for legal practitioners, 2007, in his personal or official capacities, as the Attorney General of the Federation and or as president of the General Council of the Bar, without the input of other members of the General Council of the Bar, in a meeting duly convened and notices of the said meeting properly issued and served on the members of the General Bar Council.
  4. A DECLARATION by this honourable court that the decisions and resolutions with respect to the management of the affairs of the Nigerian Bar Association, by the General Council of the Bar, especially, as it relates to the making of, and or amendment of the rules of professional conduct, can only be reached, or taken, in a meeting of the General Council of the Bar, properly convened by the Bar Council, through invitations, timely issued and served on all members of the General Bar Council.
  5. AN ORDER of this honourable court, declaring the unilateral amendment and the gazetting, of Rules, 9(2),10,11,12 and 13, of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners 2007,on the 3rd of September 2020, via the statutory instrument No 15 of 2020, by the 1st Defendant herein, as illegal, unlawful, unconstitutional and therefore null and void and of no effect whatsoever.
  6. AN ORDER OF PERPETUAL INJUNCTION, restraining the 1st Defendant, whether by itself in its official capacity or personal capacity, its agents, servants, employees, or howsoever and by whatever name called, from unilaterally altering, amending and or making rules of professional conduct for Legal Practitioners in Nigeria.
  7. FOR SUCH FURTHER OR OTHER ORDERS OR RELIEFS as this honourable Court may deem fit to make in the circumstances of this case.

He contends that given the composition of the General Council of the Bar, as provided for in section 1(2) of the Legal Practitioners Act, that the Attorney General and Minister of Justice of the Federation, and the president of the General Council of the Bar, cannot unilaterally purport to amend, the rules of professional conduct without other members of the General Council of the Bar. He further opined  that any amendment of the rules of professional conduct for lawyers in Nigeria, can only be made by the General Council of the Bar, and not by the Attorney General of the Federation, in that capacity or the capacity of the president of the General Council of the Bar.

He further pointed out  that exhibit 1(which is a copy of the amendment of the rules of professional conduct), was clearly and unilaterally made by the 1st Defendant in his capacities as the Attorney General and Minister of Justice of the Federation and the president of the General Council of the Bar. He argued that given the clear and unambiguous provisions of sections 1(1&2), and 12(4) of the Legal Practitioners Act, the 1st Defendant alone, in its capacity as the president of the General Council of the Bar, cannot unilaterally amend or make rules of professional conduct for lawyers. Any rules of professional conduct for lawyers, pursuant to sections 1(1&2) and 12(4) of the Legal Practitioners Act, must be made by the General Council of the Bar, who is statutorily empowered by virtue of section 12(4) to make such rules.  He further argued that the express mention of the Bar Council which consist of the Attorney General of the Federation as president, the Attorney General of States, and 20 members of the Association, is a clear indication, that section 12(4)  of the Legal Practitioners Act, never envisaged a situation where the 1st Defendant will amend the rules unilaterally in any capacity whatsoever. It was further his submission that in law, the express mention of a thing is an express exclusion of the things not mentioned.

It was further argued in the said suit, that paragraph 1, of the Exhibit 1, clearly show that the 1st Defendant was wielding powers, not conferred on it by section 12(4) of the Legal Practitioner Act or any other law whatsoever. The opening paragraph of exhibit 1, provided as  follows:

In exercise of the powers conferred on me by section 12(4) of the Legal Practitioners Act, Cap L11, Laws of the Federation,2004 and all other powers enabling me in that behalf, I, Abubakar Mallamai,SAN, Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice and President General Council of the Bar, make the following rules…”

It was further argued that by virtue of sections 1(1&2) and 12(4) of the Legal Practitioners Act, no powers were donated on the 1st Defendant to either make, or amend the rules of professional conduct for legal practitioners. The powers to make or amend the rules of professional conduct were donated to the General Council of the Bar, which consists of not just the1st Defendant, but Attorney General of States and twenty members of the Association, by section 12(4) of the Legal Practitioners Act. Consequently, every rule of professional conduct made pursuant to section 12(4) of the Legal Practitioners Act, can only be made by the General Council of the Bar, and not by the 1st Defendant who has no such powers. The court was referred to the case of AHMED v. ABU & ANOR(2016) LPELR-40261(CA)where the Court of Appeal held as follows:

It is now firmly settled that where a statute confers specific power on any person or authority for the performance of certain acts or duty it is only that person or authority and no other person that is contemplated in the performance of the acts or duty under the relevant Law. Only that person and none other can do that assignment and in strict compliance with the power vested in him by the relevant statute. Anything short of this cannot be endorsed by the Law. GARBA V. UNIVERSITY OF MAIDUGURI (1986) 1 NWLR (PT.18) 550, EMUZE C. V. UNIVERSITY OF BENIN (2003) 10 NWRL (PT.825) 328. In BAMIGBOYE V. UNILORIN (1999) 6 SCNJ 295, the Supreme Court re-stated the Law, thus:- “The person to whom on office is delegated cannot lawfully devolve the duty upon another unless he be expressly authorized to do so …”Per AMINA AUDI WAMBAI ,J.C.A ( P. 29, paras. A-E )

He further argued that where a statutory requirement for the exercise of a legal authority is laid down, it is expected that the public body invested with such authority would follow the requirement to the details. The non-observance in the process of reaching any decision renders the decision itself a nullity. BAMIGBOYE V. UNIVERSITY OF ILORIN (Supra), YEMISI V. FIRS (2012) LPELR CA/AK/02/2010.The position of the law, is that every action founded on a void act, is also bad and incurably bad. You cannot put something on nothing and expect it to stand. We refer my Lord to the case of Macfoy V UAC Ltd (1962) AC 152 at 160.

The Court was urged to declare the unilateral amendment and the gazetting, of Rules, 9(2),10,11,12 and 13, of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners 2007, on the 3rd of September 2020, via the statutory instrument No 15 of 2020, by the 1st Defendant, as illegal, unlawful, unconstitutional, ultra vires, and therefore null and void and of no effect whatsoever.

Nkem Okoro, who jointly filed the action with Monday Ubani Esq, said they also asked the court to declare the provisions of section 23A of the Legal Practitioners Act, as unconstitutional for taking away the right of access to court by lawyers.

No date has been fixed for the hearing of the suit.

Olonisakin, CCB Chair, task Officers on assets declaration

896

The Chief of Defence Staff (CDS), General Gebriel Olonisakin, Wednesday, restated that all senior officers must be responsible for resources at their disposal.

Olonisakin, who reinforced his stance on accountability among officers of the Armed Forces of Nigeria at the opening ceremony of a 2-day workshop on Compliance with Asset Declaration and Code of Conduct for senior officers of the Defence Headquarters, observed that, “strict compliance with the provisions of the Code of Conduct is an opportunity to express a transparent stewardship in our day to day activities”

According to him, “this seminar is important especially for you senior officers, who, not only draw funds from government’s coffer, but are also responsible for the resources at your disposal. As I have always stressed, every officer who holds a position of responsibility must also be accountable. You are also aware that accountability is one of the cornerstones in the fight against corruption which is one of Mr President’s 3-point agenda.

“As I have been rightly informed, one of the objectives of this workshop is to educate and sensitize officers and men of the Armed Forces of Nigeria on the code of conduct and other constitutional responsibilities. As members of the Armed Forces, strict compliance with the provisions of the Code of Conduct is an opportunity to express a transparent stewardship in our day to day activities.

“It is my believe therefore that at the end of this 2-day workshop, you would have acquired sufficient knowledge and reasons why you must be compliant in your asset declarations and other requirements of the Code of Conduct Bureau”.

He added further that, “on a general note, since my assumption of office as the Chief of Defence Staff, I have always canvassed and pursued a system that emphasises judicious use of scarce resources to optimise value for the limited resources at our disposal.

“The procurement process has been reorganized to ensure transparency and full compliance with the guidelines of the Bureau for Public Procurement. The implication of this is that we have been able to cut down waste and ensure judicious utilisation of funds.

In his remarks, the Chairman Code of Conduct Bureau, Prof. Mohammed Isah, stated that Section 153 (1) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) empowers the Bureau to establish and maintain a high standard of morality in the conduct of government business.

He added further that out is also within the powers of the Code of Conduct Bureau to ensure that actions and behaviours of Public Officers conform to the highest standards of public morality and accountability.

According to him, “this enlightenment workshop is therefore an aspect of the preventive measures the Bureau undertakes to sensitize public officers and general public on the Code of Conduct for public officers as contained in part 1 of the Fifth Schedule, to the 1999 CFRN (as amended).

“It is the strong belief of the Bureau that when top public functionaries of government are aware and abide by these Codes of Conduct for Public Officers, the need for the application of punitive measures would be minimized to the lowest ebb if not eliminated, thereby reducing the resources expended on prosecution of cases.”

Earlier in his address, the Chief of Defence Policy and Plans, Air Vice Marshal CI Oghomwen, noted that the workshop will educate military officers on the Code of Conduct and other constitutional responsibilities, as well as the consequences of non-compliance for military personnel.

According to him, “it will also provide a practical guide on the completion of the asset declaration form. The workshop being conducted today and tomorrow will ensure that all officers are abreast with extant regulations on code of conduct of public office holders. The workshop has been carefully planned and experts selected to sensitize participants on the key areas of the programme.”

Two arraigned for allegedly defrauding businessman of N1.4m

423

Two men on Wednesday appeared in a Grade I Area Court for allegedly defrauding a businessman of N1.4 million.

The police charged Elum Chibueze and Ogundele Micheal with joint act, criminal breach of trust and cheating.

The Prosecution Counsel, John Okpa, told the court that police investigations into a direct criminal complaint revealed that the defendants fraudulently obtained the N1.4 million from the complainant, Arise Okoronkwo.

Okpa said the defendants collected the money for a non-existent piece of land in Bwari Area Council, FCT, adding that offense contravened the provisions of sections 97, 312 and 322 of the Penal Code.

The defendants, however, pleaded not guilty to the charges.

The defense counsel, Moses Ugwummadu, urged the court to grant bail to his clients in the most liberal terms, adding that a reliable surety would be provided if granted.

The Judge, Muhammad Adamu, admitted the defendants to bail in the sum of N500, 000 each with one reasonable surety each in like sum.

Adamu ordered that the sureties must reside within the court’s jurisdiction and present means of identification.

He added that the addresses of the sureties must be verified by the prosecution counsel and adjourned the case until Oct.14 for hearing.

Visa Ban: FG, US in closed door meeting

111

The Federal Government and the United States are locked in a closed door meeting over visa ban on some categories of Nigerians.

The meeting which is ongoing at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is expected to provide the country the opportunity to brief the US government on steps taken so far to resolve the issues.

The meeting it was learnt started at 11am.

The Minister of Foreign Affairs, Geoffrey Onyeama is head of Nigeria’s delegation to the meeting while the US Ambassador to Nigeria, Mary Beth Leonard leads the US delegation.

They are expected to brief the media immediately after the meeting.

Details soon…