Home Blog Page 928

(Opinion) Apartheid: How el Rufai distinguished between Emir of Zaria, Chief of Adara; Kaduna North and South

0

By Awemi Dio Maisamari, President, ADA

The Adara nation wish to commiserate with the Zazzau Emirate Council, the entire Zazzau people and the government of Kaduna state on the demise of His Royal Highness, the Emir of Zazzau, Alh. Shehu Idris. We empathise with the Zazzau people most deeply because the loss of this revered Royal Father has brought back the sad memories and deep sorrow of the abduction and gruesome murder of our revered 1st Class Royal Father, Dr. Raphael Maiwada Galadima (JP) of blessed memory. May the souls of the departed through the mercy of God rest in perfect peace, Amen.

We are however saddened and appalled to observe that Governor Elrufai has used this sober occasion to publicly showcase the status differential between Northern and Southern Kaduna people in his administration. As a mark of well deserved honour to the late 1st Class Emir who died naturally, three days mourning period and a public holiday were declared by the Governor.

Also, in a matter of a few days, arrangements are in top gear to peacefully appoint a successor to the throne based on established Zazzau customs and traditions.

On the other hand, the 1st Class monarch of Adara Chiefdom was abducted like a commoner and eventually assassinated in very humiliating and suspicious circumstances. And yet the Governor did not consider his tragic demise deserving of any extraordinary action, special honour, press statements, tributes or even ceremonial calls for public mourning by the state government. This was again followed by the greatest mark of dishonour and treachery to our monarch and Adara people as a whole.

Our people were shocked to learn that Adara Chiefdom and Adara Traditional Council had been secretly scrapped by the Governor five months earlier.

The unacceptable scrapping of Adara Chiefdom and the creation of Kajuru Emirate on Adara land were made known a few days after the murder of our Royal Father. Furthermore, even the investigation and prosecution of the masterminds and executors of the crime are not being given the publicity, importance and urgency they deserve.

These are displays of sharply contrasting policies, actions, attitudes and body language by the Governor on the death of two 1st Class monarchs. This shows his total and unapoligetic disrespect and desdain for the traditional rulers and people of Southern Kaduna. Therefore, the Emir’s death has finally unmasked Governor Elrufai’s apartheid and segregationist system in Kaduna State beyond any reasonable doubt.

Many other examples of the Governor’s segregationist policies can be cited in the state. He has balkanized the largest Christian majority Adara Chiefdom whose size covers only two local governments. But he has left Zazzau Emirate intact with ten local governments.

He sympathizes and apologizes for Fulani terrorist attacks in Northern Kaduna but blames Southern Kaduna communities for the endless atrocities on their people by his kinsmen. He has ignored the humanitarian crisis affecting tens of thousands of Fulani terrorist attack victims and internally displaced persons in Southern Kaduna.

But he is prioritizing the construction of multi-billion Naira roads, buildings and markets for the benefit of some Hausa/Fulani Muslim localities and settlements.

He has forcefully changed the nomenclatures of non-Muslim Chiefdoms in Southern Kaduna to open them up for Muslim settlers in the area. But he has also dubiously converted some Chiefdoms in the area to Emirates to marginalise non-Muslim citizens in the Chiefdoms. In Kajuru Local Government Area, he has even forcefully subjected the more than 95% Christian population under the newly converted and tiny Kajuru Emirate enclave.

Based on the above few out of the many examples of religious and ethnic segregation, there is full blown apartheid system in Kaduna State.

For several years now, Adara community in particular and the natives of Southern Kaduna in general have been crying out against the injustice of Elrufai’s government. The ubiquitous injustice is reflected in political domination, unfriendly policies, skewed appointments and project execution, selective justice and judicial bullying, economic deprivation and empoverishment, mal-administration and official high handedness, condonment of targeted insecurity, educational exclusion, cultural suppression, religious discrimination and moral double standards.

With 51% and 56% of the Kaduna state population and land area respectively, Southern Kaduna people should be equal partners with others in a democratic state. However, it is rather very unfortunate that Elrufai seems to be so fanatical about his tribe, religion and political leaning that truth and justice no longer matter in the state.

Adara Development Association is therefore appealling to the Governor to rethink his principles and policies in the interest of sustainable social harmony, genuine peace and equitable development of the state. This is necessary in the over all interest of our helpless Adara community, other Southern Kaduna victims and even his privileged and favoured people who are also agonising from the insensitivity of his administration.

Nigeria @ 60: Kukah Laments Political Stagnation, Economic Retrogression

0

As Nigeria celebrates 60 years of nationhood this week, the Archbishop of Sokoto Diocese of the Catholic Church, Rev Father Hassan Kukah, has lamented the crass nepotism and poor governance which have culminated in the country’s political stagnation and economic retrogression, and advocated a review of the nation’s leadership recruitment system.

Kuka, who decried what he called “diminishing involvements of the elites in governance in the face of massive hemorrhage of Nigerian intellectuals and best hands outside the country”, urged the elite and intellectuals to get involved in politics and take back leadership from mediocre.

Delivering a paper titled: “Sixty Years of Nigeria’s Journey to Democracy: Hopes and Impediments” as part of lectures organised by the Association of Retired Career Ambassadors of Nigeria,(ARCAN), he said contrary to the practice in Nigeria, alumni of the best universities in the world today are governing various countries.

“At independence, Nigerians had high hopes. We expected more than what we have now. Nigeria has never been as sad, as cynical as divided as frustrated as we are now. The nation is full of ethnic jingoism and cultural arrogance. Political power has been so privatised along ethnic lines. Despite the fact that we gained independence without bloodshed, 60 years after, blood now flows on our streets. We didn’t prepare for this.

“We have had too many accidental leaders, people who are not mentally prepared to govern; people who do not have the requisite education and lack the capacity to lead and manage diversity are the one governing the nation. We cannot succeed as a nation this way.

“Most of British leaders are products of Cambridge and other top universities, and that explains why they are doing well, but no such can be said of Nigeria. We must insist that anybody seeking public office possess requisite education,” he said. Kukah identified justice, representation, equity and freedom as four pillars of democracy, stating that “When we want to identify what has gone wrong with our democracy, we must look at the corrosive influence of military rule. It is not enough to say soldiers tried.

Yes they may have tried, in the same say that even if the church becomes active in politics they may try to govern, but that is not what that institution was made to achieve. In the same way the military was never, even at the best of times to achieve he principles of democracy.

“So we must correlate our political stagnation, our democratic decay with these excesses that were imposed into the system and this is why we are finding it increasingly difficult to produce an acceptable constitution because the military came with a Messiah complex but was never able to achieve the goals it set for itself.

“Just to tell you how far we have travelled, and it has not been very far, today, after many years, since 1966 we have been under a form of military rule, because our President is a retired General, and you cannot expect either himself or former President Olusegun Obasanjo to suddenly put on agbada and hold the constitution and expect that over 40 years of military discipline ingrained in them to suddenly disappear.

And that is while (either President Buhari or former President Obasanjo) are finding it with severe difficulty to manage diversity which are the key ingredients of democracy. In the military they say you are either for us or against us, like Obasanjo said eloquently, we do not accept 99 per cent loyalty. You can’t speak like that in a democracy.”

Father Kukah, who relieved found memories of Nigeria’s independence as a flagwaving pupil in the primary school then, said clearly Nigeria has not got to where it expected when it started this journey, and to identify what went wrong it must appreciate the context and not just the concept of democracy.

“It is important we reflect on our democracy and by extension the country, regarding where we are now and where we are expected to be. Reflecting on the lofty dreams of our founding fathers to build a just and equitable nation where no man is oppressed can be attained.

“Many forms of government have been tested, but it is true that very few of these systems of government meet the need of the aggregate number of people, especially as it affects the pursuit of happiness.” He said happiness of the citizens was central to the United States such that its declaration of independence in 1776, happiness speaks to the foundation of the new government and adoption of democracy, giving them the right to vote out a government that failed to meet their inherent needs.

Quoting from the American independence declaration, he said: “When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

“We hold this truth to be self-evident that all men and women were created equal and were endowed by the creator with certain inalienable rights. Among these are rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, derive in their just power from the consent of the governed.

“Whenever any form of government is destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it and to institute a new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organising its power in such form that they shall see mostly likely to effect their safety and happiness.”

The Bishop therefore, queried: “Is anybody worried therefore, that Nigerians are exploring alternatives, asking for restructuring, Republic of Biafra and other agitations, seeking a new nation or wanting to go separate ways? It is because intrinsically, they look at the mirror and can see serious and sever constraints and obstacles to pursuit of happiness in the country.”

He said neither the government nor religion defines happiness for the people, but the structures like constitution and other rules put in place by government are important only to the extent that they make the pursuit of happiness a reality.

He urged Nigerian leaders and all to refocus on the dreams of the nation’s founding fathers and learn from President Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Speech which has become the cornerstone of democracy that states: “It is for us the living, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which those who died fought for,…It is rather for us to be dedicated to the great task before us.”

He said we need to build on the opportunities available now, beause the rest of th world is not going to slow down to accommodate our waywardness, hoping that October 2021 will see us a better nation, better prepared to hold hands together and be a great country.

He warned that in this knowledge age where millions of Nigerian youths have become very educated, the nation must prepare for a storm Chairman of ARCAN, Ambassador Dapo Fafowora, said though Nigeria had high hopes in 1960, such factors as military coups, inherent internal conflict, communal and ethnic and religious clashes, pervasive corruption, increasing poverty and massive mismanagement of the economy have concertedly crippled national development.

“When the British Union Jack was lowered in 1960, we had high hopes. But by 1962, Nigeria was in trouble with the political crises in the Western Region when the government at the central sacked the regional government and imposed emergency rule. And so began the chains of crises since then. However, we should still be optimistic” he said.

In his remarks, Ambassador Godknows Igali said with the evolution of democracy in Africa, the continent needs a reconstruction of democracy to produce a sort of tradodemocracy, akin to the Ubuntu philosophy in South Africa.

Putin invites U.S. to exchange pledges on non-interference in elections

0

Russian President Vladimir Putin is suggesting that Russia and the U.S. exchange pledges on non-interference in elections and other internal affairs of each other.A statement issued on Friday suggested that such issues could be either digital tools or in any other manner. 

The president suggested that the sides exchange “mutually acceptable guarantees of non-interference in one another’s internal affairs.”

Russia is urging the U.S. to launch an expert-level dialogue on the international information security, the statement read.

In conclusion, the president called on all countries including the U.S. to “work out a global agreement for the states to commit to non-aggression against one another using cybersecurity tools.” (Sputnik/NAN)

Silver lining: FG calls emergency meeting with Labour for Sunday; Governors claim resolving impasse;

317

Less than six hours to D-Day, there appears to be a thaw in the toughening of stance by the Federal Government; and the organised Labour, which appears to have fully mobilised for a total showdown: they meet in nearly an hour at 7.00 p.m on Sunday., not Monday as planned.

At the last negotiation meeting on Thursday, which was deadlocked, they agreed to re-convene on Monday; but between then and this Sunday two court orders have been issued by the National Industrial Court by the same judge stopping the strike.

 NLC President, Ayuba Wabba, told journalists after a meeting with House of Representatives, Hon. Femi Gbajabiamila, that Labour has not got the court orders stopping it from going on strike.

“We have not received any court order restraining us from embarking on tomorrow’s strike and so we are giving the Federal Government till midnight to reverse pump price and electricity tarrif or face the scheduled strike.

He accused even government of disobeying court order: ”The Federal Government failed to obey a court injunction restraining them from increasing electricity tarrif”.

With court orders that have fallen on deaf ears, Labour mobilising and calling out at least 16 core unions for a rally and a strike; while the Federal Government has been moving men and mobilising to stop the strike, even warning its own staff to report at their duty posts on Monday, the “mother of all strikes”.

It is not exactly clear the role played by Governors to bring about this new negotiation, but in communique on Saturday, the Nigeria Governors’ Forum claims itl and the Nigeria Labour Congress are on the path to resolving the impasse occasioned by the threat by workers to embark on industrial action if the Federal Government does not rescind the recent decisions to increase the pump price of Premium Motor Spirit (PMS) and Electricity Tariff in the country.

This is the outcome of an early morning dialogue between representatives of the Forum and workers which took place at the residence of the Chairman of the NGF, in Abuja, early on Saturday.

The Chairman of the NGF and Governor of Ekiti State, Dr John Kayode Fayemi spoke for the Forum while the NLC President Comrade Ayuba Wabba who was accompanied by the TUC President Quadri Olaleye and the NLC General Secretary, Emmanuel Ugboajah, to the meeting. Also at the meeting was the Director General of the NGF Mr Asishana Okauru.

The Chairman explained that Governors decided to wade into the on-going negotiations with a view to broadening consultations and assisting to bring the impasse to an end, thus averting the impending strike action. He pleaded with the NLC that the timing of the action was inauspicious and could aggravate an already worsening situation if not averted.

Dr John Kayode Fayemi emphasised that the plight of workers in the country was already in dire straits and that any action embarked upon by the union at this time would further worsen their situation as contained in the communique issued by governors after their first emergency meeting on Thursday, 24th September, 2020, since the outbreak of the pandemic and eventual lockdown of the country, last March.

The NGF Chairman said, no one that is conversant with the prevailing situation in the country would disagree with labour and its demands, as it were, but pleaded
that Governors be given time to consult more broadly with the various stakeholders, including the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Mr Boss Mustapha, the vice president and the president. This he said would be top priority for the NGF and promised to head straight to the presidency once the meeting was over.

The Governors Chairman expressed the hope that this gesture from the governors would also energise the leadership of labour to put a hold on their planned action.

On his part, the President of the NLC said the Federal Government violated the time-tested global process of dialogue and thanked the NGF Chairman for his efforts at ensuring that sanity returns to the negotiation table.

When the cost of PMS rises, the cost of everything in the country rises with it, the NLC President explained.

He agreed with the NGF Chairman and also praised him for agreeing to broaden the mechanism for consultation on the matter saying “I praise you for showing a good grasp of this matter and I believe that if they had widened the mechanism for consultation and involved people like you, we wouldn’t have come to this pass.”

In conclusion, Dr. Fayemi stated that Government and Labour are not that far apart in the negotiation and the differences are not irreconcilable. According to NGF Chairman, “our President who is always on the side of workers will not be averse to the issues being raised and I’m hopeful for an amicable settlement on the issues highlighted.”

Electricity Tariff, Fuel Price Hike: Judicial Workers To Begin Strike Monday

1

Staff of the Federal High Court across the country have indicated their intention to commence a two-week strike on September 28, 2020.

In a notice, circulated in and around the Federal High Court headquarters building in Abuja, the court staff, under the aegis of the Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria (JUSUN), said they were abandoning their duties in line with the industrial action planned by the Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC) to begin on Monday.

The NLC and the Trade Union Congress (TUC) have indicated their intention to embark on an industrial action in protest of the recent increases in the prices of electricity and petroleum products.

The unsigned notice reads: “Please be informed that the Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria (JUSUN), Federal High Court chapter shall, in collaboration with the Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC), commences a two-week indefinite strike action from Monday the 28th day of September 2020.

“All offices shall remain closed within this period. You are required to comply.”

NBA President, Olumide Akpata Sets Up Presidential Task Force To Engage CAC Over Delay In Service Delivery

0

The President of the Nigerian Bar Association, Mr. Olumide Akpata has set up a task force with a view to engaging the Registrar General of the Corporate Affairs Commission over delay in service delivery, associated with the Commission in recent times.

This is contained in a statement issued by the NBA Publicity Secretary which was made available to TheNigeriaLawyer.

Meanwhile, the task force comprises of eight persons with Mr. Ayuli Jemide, the Chairman, NBA Section On Business Law as its Chairman.

The statement reads:

NBA SETS UP TASK FORCE TO ADDRESS DELAY IN SERVICE DELIVERY AT THE CORPORATE AFFAIRS COMMISSION
 
Dear Colleagues,

As a result of the various reports and grievances expressed by legal practitioners in the delay in service delivery by the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC), due to amongst other reasons, the recent change in CAC protocols; the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) President – Olumide Akpata, has set up a Task Force to look into the complaints of lawyers over CAC’s service delivery.

The committee has the mandate to engage the Registrar-General of the Commission in order to come up with workable solutions for all stakeholders involved.
 
The members of the 8-man Presidential Task Force drawn from different branches of the NBA are:

1. Mr. Ayuli Jemide-Chairman
2 Mr. Victor Frank-Briggs-Vice Chairman
3. Ms. Olubukola Olonade-Agaga-Secretary
4 Mr. Folarin Aluko-Member
5. Mr. Marx Ikongbeh-Member
6. Member – Ms. Uche Nwadialo-Member
7. Mr. Chike Madubuike-Member
8.Mr. Ahmed Modibbo-Member

The NBA recognises that the smooth running of processes at the CAC is key to ease of doing business across the country, and its inefficiencies affect the businesses of many members of the NBA and those of their clients.
 
The NBA urges all lawyers and stakeholders to co-operate with members of the committee (who have demonstrated understanding of the issues), in working out solutions to these challenges.

Dr. Rapulu Nduka
Publicity Secretary,
Nigerian Bar Association

Magu Kicks As AGF Refuses To Appear Before Panel

0

The suspended Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, Mr. Ibrahim Magu has concluded his defence before the Judicial Commission of Inquiry on the activities of the anti-graft agency.

But Magu, according to his defence team, was shocked the Minister of Justice and Attorney-General of the Federation, Mr. Abubakar Malami (SAN) refused to honour the invitation of the panel.

Malami, who was subpoenaed by the commission, said his non-appearance is constitutional

He faulted the wordings of the invitation sent to him by the panel.

Malami said the terms and wordings of the invitation extended to him were against constitutional provisions.

According to a source in the defence team, if the AGF refuses to appear, Magu will ask Salami panel to declare all the allegations against him as frivolous.

The source said he who alleges must prove beyond reasonable doubt.

The top source said: “It was a strange and bizarre twist of events as Malami refused to appear before the Judicial Commission of Inquiry headed by the retired President of the Court of Appeal, Justice Ayo Salami despite a subpoena issued to him by the Chairman of the Judicial Panel of Inquiry set up by President Muhammadu Buhari to investigate the allegations he leveled against the Acting Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, Mr. Ibrahim Magu.

“Magu had consistently requested the opportunity to confront his accuser before the Panel including an opportunity to be given the allegations leveled against him by the Attorney-General of the Federation.

“Malami failed to appear before the commission to substantiate the allegations he leveled against Magu in the memo he wrote to President Muhammadu Buhari which was the basis upon which the Judicial Commission of Inquiry was set up by the President.

“However, upon conclusion of presentation of witnesses before the Commission of Inquiry, Magu was called upon to present his defence which he has done by presenting a volumes of written responses to all the allegations against him backed by numerous exhibits and truck load of documents showing his achievements as the Acting chairman of the EFCC.

‘’There were also official documents showing that no recovered assets was missing or diverted to personal use for his benefit or those of his close associates.

“Magu had also requested before the Tribunal to issue subpoenas to certain persons to appear before the Judicial Commission of Inquiry to give evidence in support of their allegations and to be cross-examined upon such wild and unsubstantiated allegations.

“In line with Magu’s request, Justice Ayo Salami who is the Chairman of the Judicial Commission of Inquiry signed and issued a subpoena to the Attorney-General of the Federation, Mr. Abubakar Malami (SAN), at the instance of Magu to come and substantiate the allegations he made against him.

“In the said subpoena, it was stated as follows; “You are hereby commanded in the name of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria to appear before the Judicial Commission of Inquiry to give evidence in respect of your allegations against Mr. Ibrahim Magu”.

The defence team source however alleged that Malami wrote Salami’s panel that his allegations against Magu were official and he could not have come to Salami’s panel to face the suspended EFCC chairman.

The source added: “But instead of appearing before the Judicial Commission of Inquiry, Malami wrote a letter in disobedience to the subpoena issued for him to appear on the authority of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

“He said he would not appear as a witness. He hinged his refusal on the fact that he only made charges against Magu based on the petitions he received against him in his office.”

As at press time, Magu’s defence team has rejected Malami’s excuse for not honouring the panel’s subpoena.

The source said: “The above excuse is untenable and is clearly contempt of judicial authority and shows total disregard for the authority of President Muhammadu Buhari on whose authority the subpoena was issued requesting his appearance before the Judicial Commission of Inquiry.

“A few weeks back, Malami had taken to the media boasting to the whole world that he would appear before the Judicial Commission of Inquiry if summoned to do so.

“Now that the opportunity has been presented, he is shying away from that call because his allegations cannot be substantiated with facts or any shred of credible evidence.

“The position of the law is clear, whenever a petitioner refuses to substantiate his petition before the appropriate authority, such a petition is declared to be frivolous.

“Now that the main accuser of Magu has refused to appear before the Judicial Commission of Inquiry, the world waits with bated breath to see what justice Ayo Salami Judicial Commission of Inquiry will report to President Muhammadu Buhari.”

In his reaction, the Attorney-General of the Federation, Mr. Abubakar Malami(SAN) said his non-appearance before Salami’s panel is constitutional.

He said his allegations against Magu were purely constitutional and not based on ulterior motive.

Malami made the clarifications in a statement through his Special Assistant on Media and Public Relations,Dr. Umar Jibrilu Gwandu.

The statement said: “The Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, SAN has said that his non-appearance at Justice Ayo Salami Panel of Inquiry probing the suspended Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, Ibrahim Magu, was purely Constitutional and not based on any ulterior motive.

“The Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice said the appearance or otherwise of the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN) to serve as a witness in any investigation should be a constitutional matter.

“In establishing propriety or otherwise of the presence of the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice whose responsibility is to hold constitutional order one must root same within the constitutional provisions.

“The terms and wordings of invitation extended to the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice by Justice Ayo Salami’s Panel of inquiry against Magu runs contrary to the Constitutional provisions.

“The Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice is by the provision of the Constitution and extant laws empowered to serve supervisory role. In the case of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice has been discharging the role effectively.”

Presidency To British Lawmakers: Don’t Be Used For Propaganda

0

The Presidency has debunked claims the administration of President Muhammadu Buhari is biased against any ethnicity or religious group.

The assertion was in response to a letter addressed to the Nigerian government by some British interests, including members of the British Parliament, legal experts and campaigners.

The Presidency, in a statement by the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and Publicity, Mallam Garba Shehu, also urged the British Parliament, as well as other British national interests to be wary of petitioners with hidden agendas so as not to be victims of dubious propaganda.

Clearing the air on the state of affairs in Nigeria, the Presidency discarded the assumption that the Muhammadu Buhari-led administration had been folding its arms while structures collapse in the country, saying that administration had been devoting quality attention and resources to all the issues raised in the letter.

According to the Presidency, the issues bordering on herders/farmers clashes, the protracted fight against insurgency and the phenomenon of banditry and other forms of criminalities, had been receiving appropriate attention, stating the various efforts of government to tackle each menace.

It went further to debunk the claim by two of the signatories to the petition against the administration; General Theophilus Danjuma (Rtd) and the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, citing reasons why their allegations or information emanating from such characters as these should be disregarded.

“The President and Government of Nigeria welcome the seriousness of the letter from UK lawmakers, legal experts and campaigners.

“We welcome the attention paid to this serious challenge by the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group and seek to work with you, the Commonwealth and all concerned parties to bring a lasting solution to herder-farmer clashes, and the threat posed to all Nigerians – and the Sahel region as a whole – from Boko Haram terrorists and their allies.

“We ask our British colleagues to visit Nigeria, whether formally or informally to discuss all the points raised in their letter. Our government is made equally of Christian and Muslim cabinet members; our Vice President is an Evangelical Pastor. We have everything to gain as a country through international cooperation with concerned, senior British parliamentarians and policymakers.

“The threat to civilians and peaceful co-existence between different ethnic and religious groups from Boko Haram, banditry and land disputes is of serious concern to the President and the government. It is incorrect, however, to assert that the government has or is doing nothing to address these intertwined threats.

“Firstly, there are on-going efforts for the establishment of cattle ranches to prevent or curtail open grazing, the practice that brings herders and farmers into conflict. This is an age-old problem facing Nigerian Governments since the colonial days.

“However, matters of land distribution are dealt with at state level. This means willingness has to be shown by state governors to drive the process forward. The Federal Government launched a plan last year to work with states to address these issues – together. Unfortunately, this has been lacking in some states.

“Secondly, with regards to the long and determined battle waged against Boko Haram, Nigerians are aware of the efforts made by this Government. When the government came to power, the terrorist group held and administered an area the size of Belgium. Now they hold none. The terrorists are hiding out amongst remote forests and across borders. This makes it difficult to extinguish the final flames of the insurgency, and the government has no illusions of the potent threat still posed. However, the progress made cannot be denied.

“Thirdly, in the face of rising crime and insecurity, the government’s new community policing initiative was launched this month. 10,000 new constables are being recruited from the areas they will safeguard – as opposed to past practice. The government hopes this will bring policing closer to local communities. N13 billion has been earmarked for this initiative”, the statement said.

Meanwhile, responding to the characters of the petitioners against the administration, the statement noted that neither General Danjuma, nor Kanu, deserved to be taken seriously, citing their personal antecedents, including the fact that Danjuma, as Minister of Defense, between 1999 and 2003, supervised the putting down of both ethnic religious uprisings, while Kanu had been using religion as a guise.

“At the same time, as we take note of the lawmakers’ letter, it is also important to stress to our partners and colleagues in the United Kingdom that not all who press them have the best interests of either democratic governance or peaceful coexistence in mind.

“For example, the former Nigerian Chief of Army Staff, named and quoted in the letter as a source on military matters, relinquished that position some 40 years ago – in 1979. He was last in a government position 17 years ago in 2003 (as Minister of Defence).

“At that time, religious and ethnic riots erupted in two states of the federation, (2001 and 2002), these were violently and ruthlessly put down by the military under his authority, leading to the loss of thousands of lives and the displacement of some further 50,000 persons. He is, therefore, not a natural source of pressure for good governance.

“Another, signatory to the letter, is well-known to be associated with the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, a Nigerian-blacklisted terrorist group. The IPOB are running a well-known (source-of-financing-unknown) international campaign intended to damage the reputation of Nigeria and its government in order to further their cause of ‘independence’.

“He jumped bail in Nigeria. He frequently travels on a Nigerian passport but urged his supporters to burn their passports! The IPOB barely mention their aims in their publicity; neither do they mention that their own leadership do not claim to be Christian.

“Yet, their media and lobbying campaign has focused near-exclusively on promoting matters related to Christianity in Nigeria, promulgating false claims that a government with 50 per cent of its cabinet and 50 per cent of its State Governors who are Christian somehow works against Christians. We call on our British friends and colleagues to join us in addressing genuine solutions not pander to agents of anarchy,” the statement said.

Magu Panel: My Non-Appearance Constitutional — AGF, Malami

356

Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, SAN has said that his non-appearance at Justice Ayo Salami Panel of Inquiry probing the suspended Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, Ibrahim Magu, was purely Constitutional and not based on any ulterior motive.

This is contained in a statement issued by Dr. Umar Jibrilu Gwandu, Special Assistant on Media and Public Relations, Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice which was made available to newsmen on Thursday the 24th day of September, 2020.

According to the statement, the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice said the appearance or otherwise of the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, SAN to serve as a witness in any investigation should be a constitutional matter.

In establishing propriety or otherwise of the presence of the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice whose responsibility is to hold constitutional order one must root same within the constitutional provisions.

The terms and wordings of invitation extended to the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice to Justice Ayo Panel of inquiry against Magu runs contrary to the Constitutional provisions.

The Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice is by the provision of the Constitution and extant laws empowered to serve supervisory role. In the case of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice has been discharging the role effectively.

17 Years After Oyi: The untold story of Senator Chuba Okadigbo

0

By Celestine Okafor

Friday, September 25, 2020, was exactly seventeen (17) years Nigeria’s most intellectually gifted Senate President, Senator (Dr) Chuba Okadigbo, popularly known as “Oyi of Oyi” passed on.

Chuba, as he was fondly called, died late evening of Thursday, September 25, 2003, while being rushed to the National Hospital Abuja, following a medical complication arising from a tear gas substance sprayed by the police on him and on President Muhammadu Buhari, along with other defunct All Nigerian Peoples Party (ANPP) politicians, during a party rally at the Kano Stadium. He was eventually buried on Saturday, December 5, 2003.

During his lifetime, Dr. Okadigbo was a renowned charismatic politician, an ivory tower intellectual, an existential philosopher and popular grassroots politician whose fame, based essentially on his solid personal achievements, cuts across the length and breadth of Nigeria and beyond. And of course, the “Great Oyi” knew this much.

“When fans hail me, presidents feel awkward,” said Okadigbo in his last interview with this reporter in the early week of September, 2003, shortly before his demise. That Sunday, afternoon, Chuba hobbled, though, with some regal confidence, to his usual sitting position in the sparsely-furnished living room: a beautifully designed single-seater upholstery chair, covered with animal skin. His tall, lanky frame accentuated his aristocratic bearing. As he gracefully relapsed onto his chair, he quickly adjusted himself; his right arm carefully thrown under the nape of his head in a head-supporting position.

This princely poise was typical of the late Senator Chinwuba Godson Wilberforce Okadigbo, former Senate President of Nigeria, ex-Vice Presidential candidate of the ANPP in the 2003 presidential election and a foremost Igbo intellectual, a continental scholar and Nigerian statesman.Buhari and okadigbo

At the time of speaking with Okadigbo that hot Sunday afternoon, the “Oyi of Oyi” and the “Ekwueme of Ogbunike” in Anambra State, however, was in Lagos to confer with his political supporters. He was around for serious political business, but he equally had time for other things, part of which was this interview, conducted in his Apapa, Lagos home. The interview explored the man and the myth called Chuba Okadigbo. For a greater part of his political and academic career, which spanned well over 43 years, Okadigbo’s politics, philosophy, character and mannerism, are well-known, but the factors that made the totality of the man called Oyi, remained yet unknown to many.

With a long-drawn hysterical laughter and nostalgia evident on his face, Chuba was ready for self-disclosure. As the reporter appeared quite ready to burrow like an earthworm into the Okadigbo persona, the Chuba myth, the lawmaker was indeed ready to reveal the many other unknown sides of him. Prodded, however, to disclose the secrets of his radical inclination and gift of intellect, wit and oratory, Okadigbo said: “I’m a man of adventure, I don’t toe popular mundane line, especially when such path does not advance the cause of humanity. You see, at a time in the days when we were younger, when it was fashionable to school in England, France, Canada or America or to read Law, Medicine or Engineering, I went to the East Germany, a communist enclave, the radical society where there is the other point of view. That time, it was an offence to go to such places for anything. But while in communist Germany as a student, I saw the difference between our society, the capitalist society and the communist society. I studied both of them. The reigning philosophy then was Maxism and Leninism (philosophy of Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin).

Chuba left Germany later, as a result of the position of their government during the Nigeria-Biafra war, and headed for the Catholic University in America. “This Catholic tertiary institution was a direct antithesis to the Karl Marx University in East Germany where I had studied. I was able to reconcile the two extremes; but then, I had already attuned my mind, my orientation, to the Marxist radical philosophy which I counter-balanced with the American mercantile philosophy. As a matter of fact, the Catholic University shaped my life a lot in the sense that it re-enforced my Christian values deeply and helped in my appreciating humanity. The University also sharpened my knowledge skill tremendously”.

Prior to his exposure to Marxist ideas in Eastern Germany, young Chuba Okadigbo had other influences. As a sophomore at St. Patrick’s College, Asaba, in Delta State, Nigeria, his late father, Chief Ozota (fight for it) Okadigbo, a District Officer (D.O.) in Ogwashi-Ukwu, also in Delta, was in the habit of coercing the young man to educate his mind by reading the daily newspapers and listening to the radio news and summarising the news items for him. The old man’s favourite dailies then were the Daily Times and the West African Pilot newspapers. Also, Chuba was exposed by his father to philosophy digest.

“That set my mind into the higher realm of philosophy,” Okadigbo chuckled, adding that “at St. Patrick’s College, I was taught civic education which was part of our academic curricular. We were made to know our rights quite early. It also helped to develop my spirit of nationalism. We became nationalists between 1955 and 1959 when Nigeria was looking for her Independence. I thank God I had that civic education. So, you can see that I grew up with the idea of freedom; freedom of the mind and freedom of the society. That is why I don’t let anybody, no matter how highly-placed, to trample on my rights and go scot-free. I love human freedom. I fight when those rights are violated,” he said.

Okadigbo’s concept of freedom and quest for power was further inculcated in him, and in his eight other siblings while growing up. His District Officer father – a tall, lanky, native aristocrat in the colonial service who could be described as a man of authority and power – impressed it on the younger Okadigbos, that power is beautiful, a gift of God. Power, he told them, is a cold-blooded calculation which should be preserved and exercised. The old man made his children to understand that power flows in their family, and in their veins; a thing which had been in the Okadigbo family line.

“We were trained to believe that greatness had been with us a long, long time ago,” said Oyi, smiling. “No Okadigbo son or daughter is trained to be a coward; we were born to walk in places of authority through sheer prowess, and we have maintained that.” In the Okadigbo family, Chuba’s mother, the late Chief (Mrs.) Catherine Anyanwu Okadigbo, a baker, women trainer and mobiliser, radiated power and grace. Tall and gracefully-built, she, according to Chuba, was known to be the prettiest woman in Ogbunike, the home town of the Okadigbos in Oyi Local Government Area of Anambra State, South East Nigeria. She was also a scion of the aristocracy, a titled chief called “Nne mmanwu” (mother of the masquerade) who commanded great respect and authority, and was – because of her background, unrivaled personal achievement and physical endowment – accepted into the hallowed traditional club of men called “Ndi-Eze” (the venerated Corp of titled chiefs and kings).

Catherine Okadigbo, Chuba recalled, imparted discipline in her children. From her, young Chuba inherited the gift of oratory, wits, intellectual sophistry, love, personal charm and empathy for fellow men.

As a growing little boy, Senator Chuba Okadigbo was a bit rascally and rough, but brilliant and well focused. He was a determined lad who loved challenges. Among his two immediate brothers, Edmund (elder) and George (younger), Chuba was relatively disadvantaged. While the other two were fair-skinned like their mother, the ex-Senate President was dark like his father. Several incidents that happened between the three brothers ignited the fire of subtle sibling rivalry. As a result of this, there was a personal determination by Chuba to conquer his brothers through achievements and excellence.

“Because of the light complexion of my brothers, people easily took note of them and ignored me,” he said, but not with any tinge of bitterness. “And whenever we went out with our mother, people admired them; they caressed their heads and gave them money, while forgetting me. Rather than envy them, I was determined to work hard and go over them and identify myself by other means. I was determined that my brothers will come to know me later by my superior achievements. That became part of the things that motivated me to do things beyond them.”

This psychology of colour, rather than give Chuba distress, however, spurred him to lofty heights in life. While at College, Chuba was very stubborn, and rightly so, especially when the school authority tries to wobble off the track of decorum and civil behaviour. He was known for his radical activities. Okadigbo specialized in organising strike actions against the school authority, exploiting his existing popularity and controlling influence on his fellow students. But he was quite smart about it, such that his stern father never got to know. While graduating from college, the school authority quickly reminded him of his past. Neatly etched in his school testimonial, was a warning to his prospective employers, that Chuba was a “specialist in organising strike actions”.

What the young man thought to be a minus in his academic record eventually became a plus for him in the future. “I came to the NCNC party office in Yaba (Lagos) in 1961 to look for a party secretary’s job. One chief Dafe, then a Zikist, was in charge of employment at the party secretariat. After interviewing me, he told me that I hadn’t shown him my testimonial. I was actually hiding it. I told him that he would not like the content; that I was a strike organiser. But he said they were actually looking for people like me. I was startled! He then employed me despite getting to know the kind of person l was. I then wondered to myself how funny this life could be. You see, an employer already knew who you were before employing you.”

All through his 43 years career as a politician and an academic, Chuba Okadigbo exhibited certain characteristics that scared some individuals and consequently alienated them from him. He had been described as an arrogant man. He said he had often tried to find out from his traducers why they see him in such uncomplimentary light, but however discovered that their explanations lack reason, logic and substance.

“They certainly can’t say that I am ostentatious,” he argued. “I think that when people can’t understand certain things about me, they call me arrogant. Secondly, I don’t genuflect under executive table, and neither do I indulge in crass sycophancy. I certainly don’t reward mediocrity. I don’t waste too much time on useless things. And I say my mind, the way I feel. I say the truth and move my arguments logically. So, when such people are overpowered by my arguments, they say I am arrogant. As a senior journalist, my good friend Celestine, a distinguished editor, for that matter, working in a well respected national newspaper, you can see it yourself, that I am an accessible person.

“You have known me for some years now. You come to my house or to my office any time and we eat together, chat like good friends that we are, discuss national and international issues, and we argue on intellectual issues most times, even though you refused to work with me when l was Senate President. You preferred your newsroom job (general laughter), do l seem to you like an arrogant? If you look at it, common people don’t say I am arrogant; it is the elites that say so. The ordinary people who have been voting for me in elections for 43 years that I have been in politics couldn’t have been voting for an arrogant man. It is only the elites, most of whom have intolerable and deplorable behaviour that requires serious castigation, that call me an arrogant person. When they (elites) want to mystify themselves, I cast them down and I will continue to do so at the risk of being called arrogant by them until the end of my days. The same people were the ones spreading stories that I was arrogant when I was Senate President of Nigeria. Most people who do not even know me believed it, simply because I refused to compromise on issues of corruption going in the executive arm of government, not to talk of the civil dictatorship (of the Olusegun Obasanjo presidency) for which those people have been exposed by time and circumstance to the Nigerian people.”

From every indication, at the time of this interview, Chuba Okadigbo was a happy and fulfilled man! He was an achiever in the race of life; very happy about his family of 10 children and a beautiful wife, Margery Okadigbo (a lawyer), a member of the 7th Senate of the National Assembly who represented Anambra North Senatorial District, just like her husband, Chuba.

This colourful politician and a high chief in Igboland, was a strong believer in culture and tradition. During the interview, Okadigbo was highly elated that all the false allegations of corrupt practices and propaganda against him as Nigeria’s Senate president “just to remove me for being an Okadigbo” were things of the past before his death.

“The Senate has reversed itself because truth is eternal and will prevail at the appropriate time. That time is now! They thought they could effectively use those false allegations against me during the presidential election campaign (in 2003); so they framed me too early to achieve that purpose. But I have forgiven all those who had wronged me. I embraced, on the floor of the senate chambers, those senators who were used against me for that false allegation, the day Senator Idris Kuta panel report was quashed.

“My family is happy about the development too. I love them (family members). I perform all my functions as a father and husband (laughs). I believe in the growth of the family, in family discipline, as we were taught, in line with the Catholic doctrine. I keep in touch with relations. I help them when I can because I don’t have stupendous wealth to help everybody. I live a moderate and simple life, no exotic cars and mansions. I don’t engage in frolics.”

Contrary to media reports shortly before the 2003 presidential election that Okadigbo and his erstwhile political boss, President Muhammadu Buhari, had mutual quarrels and political differences, the Oyi debunked all that, saying that their relationship at the time was good and rock-solid. While this interview was on-going, President Buhari telephoned Okadigbo several times to discuss numerous political and campaign issues with him. The two men laughed heartily during that interaction. “Sir, l am presently having an interview with our good friend, Celestine Okafor, the newspaper editor”, Okadigbo quickly hinted General Buhari. “Nwokem (my friend), hold on the phone, for the General”, Chuba said, grinning from ear to ear. He swiftly handed his mobile phone handset to this reporter who briefly exchanged warm pleasantries with Buhari and immediately continued with the interview session with his host.

Months earlier, at a small conclave of the select inner caucus of the then Presidential campaign team of the opposition All Nigerian People’s Party (ANPP) at the Asokoro, Abuja residence of Chief Don Etiebet, the then ANPP National Chairman, both Okadigbo, Chief Etiebet and late Dr Marshal Harry (pioneer PDP’s National Vice Chairman for the South South zone) had introduced this writer to President Muhammadu Buhari as a “credible and reliable senior journalist who believes in our progressives campaign philosophy and ability to revamp the national economy and bring about good governance in Nigeria”. However, subsequent events and other developments enhanced the familiarity that existed between President Buhari and this interviewer, to this day.

Okadigbo, however, continued: “That report (Senator Idris Kuta report against Okadigbo) was mischievous and was sponsored by our main opponent political party (the PDP), using their paid hack writers, just to give a false impression about the ANPP to the public,” the former Senate President stated. “The story was the handiwork of desperate political opponents who have failed to deliver on the dividends of democracy. I pointed out the failings of these people when I was Senate President, and they used public funds and government machinery to fight me.” Just when campaign was going on in some quarters that Okadigbo was not popular enough and might not deliver the votes of the Igbo people to the ANPP in the 2003 presidential poll, Chuba contends that his detractors were being stingy with the truth!

“I challenge them to follow me to places and to the streets. Whenever I arrive Akanu Ibiam (now International) Airport, Enugu or in any other airport in this country for that matter, I am usually accosted by a mammoth crowd. Large supporters or political followings are not for unpopular politicians. From Aso Rock to party meetings, to the National Assembly, and to the party conventions where party chairmen, president, governors, ministers and other dignitaries are seated, the crowd mob me. They hail me and president and dignitaries feel envious; they feel inferior and awkward. Even at the international airports in London, New York or Washington; in Paris, Tokyo, New Zealand or elsewhere, for instance, I am also being cheered always by the immigration officials in those countries who clear the way for me, with respect. That is what those vile critics of me are not happy about. These are the things that make one sound immodest and they say I am arrogant when I react. I am one of the most popular men in this republic, as I have always been”.

Okadigbo, a former presidential political adviser to ex-president Shehu Shagari during the ill-fated second republic and also a former University lecturer at the Faculty of Social Sciences of the University of Nigeria Nsukka (UNN), however, said that Nigerians and particularly Ndigbo love Chuba Okadigbo because of their value attachment to him. “They value integrity, merit, and knowledge, which I have sufficiently. God gave all these to me. It is not by juju (black magic). I have natural charisma, right from my childhood. It is a spiritual gift and you don’t purchase it. I don’t even know that I have them! God gave them to me, and nobody can take them away, except the Almighty God. I will go with those natural gifts down to my grave.

Chuba, however, gave a hint of the magic of his famed personal charm. “My charisma is such that if I enter your house and you have dogs, the moment those dogs see me, they stop barking, and I stroke them. I once encountered a gang of armed robbers on the highway, and when I came out of my car, they simply dropped their guns and instantly began to hail me “Oyiiii”, and even scrambled to shake my hands. It is all God’s gift! I can’t hide myself. I can’t tell people to stop liking or loving me. I have no apology for being popular. My people (Ndigbo) like strong men and I am strong. I am only sorry for those boot-lickers. I shall take them on, at the appropriate time,” he threatened.

But the “Oyii” never did! Death botched his plans, his revenge plot! Seventeen years after the death of this philosopher king, the nation fondly remembers the renowned democrat, Senator Wilberforce Chuba Okadigbo. Were he to be alive, perhaps the “Ikenga Igwuedo” surely would have risen further in his political career, or probably, would have been considering retirement from politics by now. Okadigbo also would have put in place, structures to immortalise himself, his political beliefs and philosophy. He equally would have played significant roles in deepening Nigeria’s democracy; he definitely would have been a frontliner among the progressive forces who led the democratic vanguard that brutally shot down to smithereens, the ill-conceived, the ill-fated, self-succession or tenure enlongation plot (aka Third Term) nursed by former President Olusegun Obasanjo in 2006/2007, just as he would have worked for the early reality of the Buhari presidency and play a great part in directing affairs in the administration.

Chuba certainly would have been fair, definite and vehement in his position on the contentious issue of North-South power rotation (a.k.a. zoning). He would also have championed the 2023 Igbo presidency question which is somewhat precariously embroiled in uncertainty, arising from the bogey of restructuring, political conspiracy, regional apathy and bad politics, just as he would have been in the fore-front for the reformation of Nigeria’s defective electoral system. Okadigbo would equally have raised the bar on the ongoing legislative exercise on the Constitutional Review process.

Credits: NNL