Home Blog Page 9

Roberta Flack, Grammy winning ‘Killing Me Softly’ crooner, dies at 88

0

Roberta Flack, the Grammy-winning soul singer best known for her celebrated interpretations of romantic ballads like “Killing Me Softly With His Song,” as well as her professional collaborations and social activism, has died, according to a statement from her publicist.

She was 88.

Flack died Monday at her home, surrounded by her family, Elaine Schock, her publicist, told CNN. Her death followed several years of health challenges, including a diagnosis, revealed publicly in late 2022, of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or ALS. The progressive condition, often referred to as Lou Gehrig’s disease, made it impossible for Flack to sing, her representatives said at the time.

Flack, however, had already long-cemented her legacy as one of the defining voices of her generation – both as an interpreter of others’ songs and a writer of her own – notching a slew of chart-topping hits and racking up accolades: Over her career, the classically trained daughter of a church organist secured 14 Grammy nominations and won five, including a lifetime achievement award in 2020 and back-to-back Record of the Year wins.

Questlove, drummer for The Roots, musical director for “The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon” and a filmmaker, paid tribute to Flack.

“Thank You Roberta Flack,” he captioned a throwback photo of the late artist. “Rest In Melody.”

Born in Black Mountain, North Carolina, and raised in Arlington, Virginia, Flack received classical music training throughout her childhood, starting piano lessons at age 9. By 15, she’d earned a scholarship to Howard University, where she graduated in 1958 with a bachelor’s degree in music education.

Flack taught music for a time and wanted to pursue classical music – but found the genre in the 1960s disinclined to welcome her.

“One of the hassles of being a Black female musician is that people are always backing you into a corner and telling you to sing soul,” she once told TIME. “I’m a serious artist. I feel a kinship with people like Arthur Rubinstein and Glenn Gould. If I can’t play (20th-century orchestral composer Bela) Bartok when I want to play Bartok, then nothing else matters.”

A voice teacher encouraged Flack to pursue pop music instead, and she spent nights and weekends performing in clubs in Washington, DC, before her big break one night at Mr. Henry’s, where she was discovered by jazz musician Les McCann. He helped land her an audition with Atlantic Records for which, the story goes, she played more than 40 songs over three hours.“I was so anxious and so happy, and I still am,” she told Philadelphia Weekly decades later, “but it was all a brand-new experience, and I probably sang too many songs.”

Her debut record, “First Take,” followed soon after, in 1969. It included her version of “The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face,” which was written by folk singer Ewan MacColl and helped catapult Flack to superstardom after Clint Eastwood used the recording for his 1971 film, “Play Misty for Me.” The following year, it shot to the top of the Billboard Hot 100, where it spent six weeks at No. 1, and won Record of the Year at the 1973 Grammy Awards.

By that time, Flack was already well-established, having released her sophomore follow-up, “Chapter Two,” as well as the album “Quiet Fire” and a record with Donny Hathaway, who became a close collaborator before his death in 1979. Together they won another 1973 Grammy for their duet, “Where Is the Love.”

1973 also saw Flack release her record, “Killing Me Softly,” with the titular track, “Killing Me Softly with His Song” – another smash hit that spent five weeks at the top of the Billboard chart. It would net her another two Grammy awards in 1974, for Record of the Year and Best Pop Vocal Performance by a female artist.

Across her career, Flack also interpreted a wide variety of artists, including Leonard Cohen and The Beatles, and by her fifth solo album, “Feel Like Makin’ Love,” she’d taken over as producer – a role typically filled by men in a male-dominated industry – crediting herself as Rubina Flake, her self-styled alter ego.

While her most recognizable songs might have been love songs, Flack never avoided complex issues: She tackled racial injustice on tracks like “Tryin’ Times,” social and economic inequality on “Compared to What” and nodded to the challenges faced by the LGBTQ community in her version of “Ballad of the Sad Young Men.” The Rev. Jesse Jackson once referred to Flack as “socially relevant and politically unafraid,” according to her website, though as an older adult, she lamented that many of the problems she’d confronted as a musician still festered.

“I’m deeply saddened that many of the songs I recorded 50 years ago about civil rights, equal rights, poverty, hunger and suffering in our society are still relevant in 2020,” she told AARP in 2020, acknowledging connections in her music to “the growing economic disparities, to Black Lives Matter, to police brutality, to activism versus apathy, and the need for each of us to see it and address it.”

hat legacy has persisted through the decades, as Flack influenced younger artists like Lauryn Hill and the Fugees – who released their own celebrated version of “Killing Me Softly” in 1996 – along with Lizzo, Lady Gaga and Ariana Grande.

Whether in protest, romance or the classics, whatever theme Flack approached, “every single song I’ve recorded expressed something deep and personal to me,” she told NPR music journalist Ann Powers in 2020. “Each was my singular focus whether in the studio or on the stage.”

CNN

Okutepa replies Monday Ubani, says Natasha Akpoti Uduaghan is not a senatorial effigy to be moved anyhow

By J.S. Okutepa, SAN

There have been ranging controversies over what appeared to be altercations between the Senate President Distinguished Senator Godswill Obot Akpabio and Distinguished Senator Natasha Akpoti Uduaghan over the change of her seat. A learned senior advocate of Nigeria, Dr. Monday Onyekachi Ubani SAN seems to suggest that Senator Natasha Akpoti Uduaghan should have taken the decision of the Senate President over the change of her seat and shouldn’t have protested the way she did.

He argued that the president of the Senate has the right to change the seat of any Senator and that the Distinguished Senator Natasha Akpoti Uduaghan was bound by the decision and the rules of the Senate that empowered the Senate President to change the seat.

These arguments with profound respect did not take into account the rights of Senator Natasha Akpoti Uduaghan to be informed of the reasons for the change of her seat. Why was the seat of Senator Natasha Akpoti Uduaghan changed? Even if the Senate has the right to change seats of Senators, are the Senators not entitled to be told and reasons for the change given? Was Senator Natasha Akpoti Uduaghan not entitled to be told why her seat was changed? Sometimes, we dignify an otherwise illegitimate and arrogant interference with rights under the pretences of enforcing rules.

The Rules of the Senate and the constitutional rights to fair hearing of Senator Natasha Akpoti Uduaghan, which is superior? There is no doubt that Senator Natasha Akpoti Uduaghan had acquired a right to the seat originally allocated to her. To alter that right, she was entitled to be informed, and she has the right to protest if she was not informed or was shabbily treated as it appears from her protestations under the same Senate Rules.

With profound respect to Dr. Monday Onyekachi Ubani SAN, his arguments that the senate president has the right to change the seat overlooked a very serious and more important fundamental right of Senator Natasha Akpoti Uduaghan to be told of the reasons for the change of her seat and her equal right to protests the unjust change if she felt so. To shout her down and threaten her with suspension did not only infringe on her constitutional rights to be heard, it was unfair and it can not be part of the rules of the Senate to treat her as a senatorial effigy to be moved anyhow.

In any case, and in most cases, Nigerian rulers tend to enforce self-serving rules instead of enforcing the mandatory constitutional provisions. To direct the sergeant at arm to take distinguished Senator Natasha Akpoti Uduaghan out of the senate because of her protestations on the seat change arrangements is with profound respect despotic and authoritarian display of self-help in breach of the constitutional rights to fair hearing of Senator Natasha Akpoti Uduaghan.

Why change the seat of Senator Natasha? That is a question to be asked. Why did the senate fail to accord Senator Natasha Akpoti Uduaghan the dignity of prior information of the change? In any case, what is so sacrosanct about the rules of the Senate that can override the constitutional rights of fair hearing? Can the Senate President be a judge in his own cause? What are the duties of the Ethics and Privileges Committee of the Senate?

Is the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria even obeying the Nigerian constitution? There are senators who came to the National Assembly on the platforms of political parties that sponsored their selections or elections. Today, those senators have cross-carpeted to other political parties even though there are no divisions in the political parties upon which they rode to the Senate in breach of the Nigerian constitution.

Has the Senate President declared their seats vacant as he is under constitutional duty to do? How many Senate confirmations of executive appointments has the Senate under the president of the Senate undertaken to show the seriousness of the constitutional mandate of confirmations? All one sees are cosmetic rituals of political jests of take a bow and go.

As one of my learned friends put it: “Which useless standing rules are you talking about, how can there be standing rules for people who violated all known sensible standing rules and the law by rigging elections to get themselves into the Senate? People who violate the Constitution every day by defecting from one party to the other without any consequences? So, it is an ordinary sitting arrangement that has now turned to standing rules that must be followed. Mtcheeew!!!”

Senator Natasha Akpoti Uduaghan must be left to sit in her seat to represent the Kogi people. She is under a constitutional mandate to sit for a number of days. Any attempt to harass her or intimidate her in the performance of her constitutional duties will be resisted by Nigerians who see her performances in the senate as superlative.

There are many serious businesses of governance that should engage the legislative attention of the Senate under the Senate President. The duties to make law for peace order and good governance do not include the duty to quarrel with and harass any senators or threaten suspension of a Senator for any flimsy reasons of sitting arrangements

Nigerians are not dull as some in power think of us. Nigerians know those who violated the Nigerian constitution to be in positions of responsibility in this country. The silence or patience of Nigerians should not be taken for granted. Enough of all these nonsensical demonstrations of political pettiness

IBB At 80: The unforgivable SAP, June 12 sins

By Tony Eluemunor

First of all, I hereby wish Gen. Ibrahim B Babangida (rtd) a most happy 80th birthday anniversary. I say this from the bottom of my heart. I sincerely wish I could reminisce about the lau­datory and gay experiences of this Reporter, who in April 1986 became State House (Dodan Barracks) Cor­respondent for the leading newsmag­azine of that era, the Newswatch. As experiences go, I could focus on, say my first trip to Abuja, for the 1986 Independence Anniversary. There was no Aso Rock Presidential Villa State House then. A few flats in Wuse Zone Three, very close to the Halli Brothers junction was what could then be called the State House.

It was in one of the rooms there that I overheard a telephone con­versation that later became conse­quential in Nigeria. Babangida’s Number Two man, Commodore Ebitu Ukiwe (rtd) asked his media aide how things were in Abuja. The aide related to him that a new pro­gramme for the anniversary activi­ties had just been released, and that instead of Ukiwe going into the pa­rade grounds (in Area Ten) directly before the military President, that in the new one Ukiwe would enter the parade grounds before the Army Chief of Staff, Gen. Domkat Bali, and then Gen Ibrahim B Babangida (rtd) would come in.

I heard Ukiwe say clearly: “In that case then, I will not come to Abuja. It had been agreed that I will not be attending purely military activities, where Gen Bali would be the Num­ber Two after the President. But he too will not attend non-military ac­tivities, where I will be the Number Two to the President”. And because Ukiwe failed to attend the 1986 Abuja ceremonies, he was cashiered.

Yet, to write about such would be a disservice to Nigeria. This is especially so as some persons have started a calculated attempt to, by sheer force, browbeat all of us into forgetting the disaster Babangida brought on the nation when he an­nulled the June 12, 1993 election. Be­neath that in order of consequence lies his smuggling of Nigeria into the Organisation of Islamic Coun­tries (OIC) and his introduction of Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) into the country.

Recently, there has been a burst of activities in the Nigerian firmament as Gen. Ibrahim B Babangida’s asso­ciates try to paint the legacy of his eight- year long administration in a favourable light for his 80th birthday. But all their efforts may be as fruit­ful as deodorized bullshit; it will still smell and appear nasty.

Those same associates of IBB, may not remember it now, but they and their champion had a chance to work out a wholesome legacy but that did not matter to them as they pursued their narrow-minded and personal interests, as against the in­terest of the nation. They were sure and autocratic footed in their des­potic ways, disdaining all attempts to call them to order or to walk in another direction.

The result is that for almost 30 years Babangida has remained alive to see his name being used as a bye word for nothing wholesome. Before I go into the intricate details, I must take journalistic notice that soon, President Muhammadu Buhari’s as­sociates will also ask the citizenry to be magnanimous enough as to grant Buhari stratospheric pass marks concerning the way and manner he ran his administration. In fact, Bu­hari said recently that he hoped his­tory would be fair to him. On reading him, I wondered if he does not know that the moment he assumed office as President, he started writing his personal and his administration’s history. Attempting to change that history after he would have left office would be akin to someone blowing against the wind. Even Babangida himself has shown us how to judge Buhari; he said that compared to is successors’, (and that includes Buhari’s), his own anti-corruption record appears angelic. Ah ha!

So, what I have for the likes of the newspaper columnist and Econo­mist, Mr. Dele Sobowale, is serious pity, as he attempts to present Baban­gida in more favourable light. It is a mission impossible.

I know that the likes of Sobowale have argued that it is satanic to judge a man whose presidency spanned all of eight years on just one act; his an­nulment of the June 12, 1993 election. Some have even argued that 28 long years have passed since 1993 and so Nigeria must have had several op­portunities since then to correct that mistake, no matter how costly. To such people I have only a reminder: “ä fool does not know the gravity of an offence”. IBB and Dele Sobowale are no fools but verybright minds, and so they should know the grav­ity of that terrible offence. There is another reminder; societal wounds are difficult to heal. I sincerely wish that the present leaders should take this lesson to heart and begin to correct their mistakes, because the since 2015, Nigeria’s unity has been steadily shredded.

Unlike coup speeches, Indepen­dence Anniversary addresses are often well-prepared documents and are signpost for the future. On Oc­tober 1, 1995, IBB pointed out four main problems with the Nigerian economy which he had to tackle. One; “Decrease in our domestic pro­duction while our population con­tinues to rise”. But did the domestic production increase under IBB? No, is the answer. Many manufacturing plants began to close under Buhari’s military administration owing to a lack of raw materials. But this indus­trial sickness turned an epidemic under IBB. And that trend has yet to be reversed.

Two; “Dependence on imports for both consumer goods and industrial raw materials”. Yes, IBB vowed to change that trend, but he failed woe­fully. That failure has been replicated by every succeeding administration.

Three; “A grossly widening gap between the rich and the poor.” That gap became really accentuated for the first time during IBB’s regime and has only worsened afterwards.

Four; “The big role played by the public sector in economic activities with hardly any concrete results to justify such a role.

In that speech IBB announced a ban on the importation of maize, rice and vegetable oil to “shift attention from buying and selling syndrome ad parasitic services …to increased total real production, rising labour productivity and greater efficiency in investment”. Please, could anyone point out in which way IBB’s regime succeeded in any of the above points.

In his 1986 Independence Anni­versary speech, IBB promised to: 1; Restructure and diversify the productive base of the economy to reduce dependence on the oil sector and imports. 2; To achieve a fiscal balance of payments viability over the medium term and 3; to lay the basis for a suitable non-inflationary growth over the medium and long-term. Did he succeed?

New Year day 1986, IBB increased petrol pump price from 20kobo per li­tre to 39.5 kobo; a near 100% increase. That introduced Nigeria’s to IBB’s legacy – Structural Adjustment Programme. I am not an Economist but I am ready to debate any pro-IBB Economist on the effects of SAP.

Yet, SAP had actually started on January 27, 1986, when IBB in­troduced the Second-tier Foreign Exchange Market (SFEM). In two weeks flat the value of the Naira fell by 66%. In January 1985, the N1 fetched $1.2. Within five months of SFEM, five Naira bought a dollar, at the official rate and it was N7 to $1 at the parallel market. The 5.4 pre- SFEM inflation rate surged to 10.2 within a year.

Since then, the economy has been crashing and crashing. Let nobody tell me about the Third Mainland Bridge or the Rural Life for Women but instead tell me how IBB grew the economy and jobs. My challenge is mainly directed at Mr. Dele Sobow­ale for he is an Economist. Sobowale and the other Babangidaists would be ready after that to join me in re­visiting the June 12, 1993 election annulment and the result of IBB’s smuggling Nigeria into the Organi­sation of Islamic Countries.

Babangida has not apologised to Nigerians for foisting SAP on the na­tion. He has not appologised to the nation for smuggling Nigeria into the OIC and thus added, by that sin­gular act, the religious divide that is tearing Nigeria apart today, into the age-old ethnicity issues. Now ethnic­ity and religious divide have turned Nigeria into a killing field.

Then there is the Babangidanom­ics which was hinged solely on SAP. He has not yet appologised for it. Not even when ani-SAP riots broke out in May 1989 did he plead with Nige­rians or try to seek a better route to economic paradise for Nigeria. He berated Nigerians then, saying that the rioters were merely using SAP “as an excuse to wage war against the government in order to destroy the credibility of the military insti­tution”.

A month after that, at the inaugu­ration of the Armed Forces Consul­tative Assembly on June 5, Babangi­da told critics of SAP that he would not change the direction he was tak­ing Nigeria to economically because: “This administration is committed to the programme because there is no viable alternative. We cannot and should not abandon this programme midway because the pains of trying to re-introduce it at a later stage will be worse than the current pains”.

And he actually said this then, to justify the SAP decisions: “The re­ports we have received and which we would like the opponents of SAP to know is that the prevailing situation in Nigeria is by far better than in any other African country. It is even bet­ter than the condition in most Third World states”.

Did Babangida bother to listen to the Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN)? Actually, Baban­gida listened to nobody. Had he a listening ear, he would have heard MAN’s complain in August 1988, that capacity utilization was a lowly 35 percent “because of inadequate and inefficient infrastructural facilities, high interest rates, especially for the small and medium-scale manufac­turing enterprises, sharp increas­es in the cost of imported inputs arising from the devaluation of the Naira”.

And on top of all the social and economic and religious problems Babangida unleashed on Nigeri­ans, he annulled the freest and fair­est election in the land to date. And what is his excuse: that he was forced to do so or there would have been a violent overthrow of the civilian re­gime that would have resulted. Haba, IBB, haba, have you forgotten the person who said, proudly, satiated with power, that his critics should remember that “we are not only in government; we are in power?” Why didn’t he use that power to retire the coupists if he knew what they were up to? Instead, he used the power to annul an election. IBB is 80 years old. I will respect his age and even pay due homage. That is why I am seeking soft ways of telling him that even his Number Two man, the late Augustus Aikhomu was not aware of his decision to annul that elec­tion. The Military High Command did not know. His spokesman, Duro Onabule, did not know. His political advisers such as the late Prof Omo Omoruyi did not know.

IBB annulled that election be­cause he wanted to remain in pow­er. And for that, he owes Nigeria an apology.

PS:

First published on Aug 15, 2021, this piece is being republished in response to the recent launch of IBB’s autobiography, “A Journey in Service”.

Major Bashorun’s fight for justice

0

By Richard Akinnola

Major Debo Bashorun was a Media Assistant to General Ibrahim Babangida. For years, he had a runniing battle with the military authorities, particularly Brigadier Haliru Akilu.

At the early stages of the Babangida’s government, he was quite visible in the government. He was so close to the former President that he even wrote a book on him. As a matter fact, on the day Babangida went to the NTA for his first broadcast after the ouster of Buhari, he was in the same car with IBB, editing the speech. After the parcel bomb murder of Dele Giwa, he was the one Babangida sent with a condolence letter to Giwa’s widow, Funmi, who rejected the letter.

But after a few years, things got awry between Major Debo Bashorun and General Ibrahim Babangida.

As military press secretary to the former President, his closeness to the General made the Chief spook of the government, Brigadier Haliru Akilu uncomfortable. He therefore put a wedge between the duo, as Bashorun was labeled a security risk. And who was Babangida to question his chief spook? An average dictator is a prisoner of his Security Chief. And Babangida was not an exception. What led to this?

The murder of Dele Giwa. Major Bashorun was given an assignment which Bashorun felt was to cover up the government’s complicity in the murder. He refused to play ball and he was then labeled a security risk and transferred out of Dodan Barracks after series of interrogation by the DMI.

Akilu didn’t want to see Bashorun at the Dodan Barracks, the then seat of Government and inexplicably in November, 1988, he influenced his transfer to the 31 Airborne Brigade, Markurdi.

Major Bashorun resisted the move as, according to him, the transfer was to pave way for his elimination. When his protests did not yield any fruit, he scurried to the chambers of Alao Aka-Bashorun, Late Aka-Bashorun, then president of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), advised that he resigned, which he did on December 23, 1988.

But the resignation letter was rejected by the army authroties which insisted that he must report at Makurdi. He was declared AWOL. He then instituted an action against Brigadier Akilu, Brigadier Fred Chijuka and the Army Council, alleging harassment and threat to life.
Justice Olusola Thomas, then of the Lagos High Court restrained the Army from harassing the officer and from also ejecting him from his official quarters.

At the initial period of the case, the Ministry of Defence was being defended by a retired Army Major in private practice. At the next adjourned date, Mr. Moshood Adio, then of the Ministry of Justice, appeared for the Army. Mr. Aka-Bashorun objected to his appearance on the premise that one lawyer had already filed memorandum of appearance and had not withdrawn from the case.

Justice Thomas overruled this objection and Aka-Bashorun headed for the Appeal Court which ruled in his favour.

Meanwhile, before the case went to the court of Appeal, Major Bashorun had alleged that his life was being threatened by soldiers who laid siege to his house. He therefore abandoned his house and went into hiding.

Before the next adjourned date, Major Bashorun got a hint that he might be abducted by armed soldiers at the court premises. He therefore came to court well prepared for a battle.
Dressed in a brown flowing Agbada, his eyes darted across the courtroom in quick succession. Beneath his billowing Agbada were three deadly instruments of death-two Isreali Uzzis strapped to his body and another pistol holed somewhere in his pocket.
This particular day, his usually bright and lively countenance was now contorted in an angry scowl, exhibiting a desperate mien.

With three guns in his possession, Major Bashorun was ready for battle of his life. Predictably, there were about twelve armed soldiers in the courtroom on this day.

Before the court started sitting, Major Bashorun confided in his lawyer, Aka-Bashorun what was in the offing. He told Aka-Bashorun: “They want to seize me. They want to take me to Makurdi by force and kill and I am not going. I’m ready to die here in the courtroom. Before they kill me. I will kill some of them. Some of them will go along with me. That’s why am with these guns.”

He, therefore cautioned Aka-Bashorun to leave the courtroom immediately after the court session or to stay put in the court so that he won’t be caught in the cross-fire outside the courtroom.

As soon as the case was adjourned, Aka-Bashorun told his junior lawyers to quickly pack their books and disappear from the vicinity.

On his way out, he met Brigadier Chijuka and challenged him why there were so many soldiers around. Chijuka assured him that there was no cause for alarm. But Aka-Bashorun was not satisfied with such an assurance. We all doubled our steps and stood at the Igbosere Street adjourning the High Court, to watch the battle at a safe distance. But that was not to be as nothing happened.

Major Bashorun eventually escaped to the United States of America.
-Richard Akinnola

60-year-old woman abducted from Kano hospital

A 60-year-old woman, Talatu Ali was kidnapped last Wednesday from the Neuro-Psychiatric Hospital Dawanau in Dawakin Tofa Local Government Area of Kano State.

Hajiya Ali was reportedly abducted while she was awaiting medical consultation.

Intelligence sources told security analyst, Zagazola Makama that the victim had been brought to the hospital by her son, Nasiru Aliyu, and her cousin, Aliyu Garba, both from Yar Gaya Village in Dawakin Kudu LGA, on February 19, 2025, at about 8: a.m.

It was gathered that while in the queue for consultation, they suddenly discovered that she had disappeared.

All efforts to locate her within the hospital premises proved abortive, prompting the family to report the case at the Dawanau Divisional Police Headquarters.

On February 21, at about 7: 00 a.m., Aliyu received a phone call from an unknown number confirming that the victim was in the caller’s custody.

Authorities believe the abductors may have deliberately targeted the hospital, exploiting its vulnerability to infiltrate and take hostages.

The Kano State Police Command confirmed the abduction.

Teenage girl arrested in Cross River for attempting to shoot teacher, married male friend allegedly supplied gun

The Cross River State Police Command has detained a 16-year-old secondary school student for allegedly attempting to attack her teacher with a firearm, sparking widespread outrage and a debate over juvenile delinquency and societal accountability.

The incident occurred after the teacher reportedly disciplined the girl for violating school rules by cutting her coloured hair, a policy enforced by the institution. Enraged by the disciplinary action, the student allegedly returned to school with a pistol hidden in her bag, intending to harm the educator.

Thankfully, the authorities intervened before the attack could be carried out.

During interrogation, the teenager shocked investigators with two revelations:

She is an active member of the Sky Queens Confraternity, a female cult group notorious for violence and criminal activities.

The firearm belonged to her “man friend,” identified as a married father of six residing in the community.

The Cross River State Police Public Relations Officer confirmed the arrest, stating, “We are treating this case with utmost seriousness. The minor is in custody, and we are pursuing leads to apprehend the adult male who supplied the weapon. Cultism and underage access to firearms are grave threats we must eradicate.”

The girl claimed her relationship with the married man began through social media, though details remain under investigation.

The case has ignited fierce debate across social media, schools, and households, with stakeholders pointing fingers at multiple parties:

Critics question how a teenager gained access to a firearm and engaged with a much older man. “Where were her parents? This is a failure of supervision,” a local activist remarked.

Also, concerns linger over whether educators missed warning signs of the girl’s cult affiliation or behavioural shifts.

However, the rising cultism, peer pressure, and moral decay are cited as catalysts. “We’ve normalized crime and glorified lawlessness,” a community leader lamented.

Meanwhile, some argue that churches and mosques have failed to instil moral values in young people.

Calls for stricter laws against cultism and adult exploitation of minors are mounting and child protection groups have demanded urgent interventions, including:

Mandatory counselling programs for at-risk youth.

Crackdowns on cult groups and illegal firearm trafficking.

Parental education campaigns on monitoring children’s social circles and online activity.

A teacher at the school, who requested anonymity, expressed shock: “This is a wake-up call. We need safer schools and better mechanisms to identify troubled students.”

Police are working to apprehend the girl’s alleged accomplice, while child welfare officials assess her custody arrangements.

The arrest of Apetu of Ipetumodu by US government

By Tribune Editorial Board

In what would appear to signpost the unabated impairment of the moral value system in the Nigerian society, yet another citizen has, in a sense, put the country in the eye of the storm on account of his alleged fraudulent activities in the United States. This development is not assuaged by the fact that the suspect, who has been in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) since 2024, is a prominent traditional ruler in Osun State. The Apetu of Ipetumodu in Osun State, Oba Joseph Oloyede, is facing charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud and money laundering. He is accused of defrauding the US government to the tune of $4.2 million. He was said to have presented fake documents for his businesses and those of others in order to benefit from the US government loan support to struggling businesses in the aftermath of COVID-19.

It is important to note that the Oba also took fees from the owners of the businesses he allegedly rendered criminal services to, meaning that his entire motive for the scheme was filthy lucre. He was accused of not only collecting loans for which his businesses, if they existed, were not qualified, but also allegedly took cuts from the loans taken by businesses which he aided to gain fraudulent access. For any ordinary citizen, Oba Oloyede’s larcenous action is outrageous but for someone of the stature of a traditional ruler, it is simply abominable. And worse still, the US authorities found that Oba Oloyede applied the loan to defray personal expenses even though it was specifically earmarked for payment of fixed debts, payroll and other permissible bills!

Sadly, what the Oba has done is not alien to this clime; some Nigerian elites do the same with any official actions/initiatives by the government to bring succour to the weak in the country. They typically study the initiatives for the loopholes around them before latching onto such loopholes to corner the initiatives and crowd out the intended beneficiaries. However, the difference is that the elite hardly gets away with such fraud in the civilised climes where systems audit, programme review and evaluation are a must. It was apparently such an evaluation that unmasked the traditional ruler. It is most unfortunate. Apparently, there is a lesson for the Nigerian anti-graft agencies to learn from this incident. And that is the supremacy and efficacy of painstaking inquiries into allegations of fraud or corruption over media trials of suspects even before investigations are concluded. It is imperative to note that the alleged fraud over which Oba Oloyede was apprehended by the FBI was perpetrated during the COVID-19 era but the Oba was not taken into custody until around May 2024 when he returned to the US where his family members reportedly reside. If the investigation of the fraud had not been discreet, Oba Oloyede would not have walked into the waiting hands of the FBI.

The way some traditional rulers behave these days—the ease with which they breach traditional and moral codes, the laws of the land and even the laws of other countries—is a source of great concern. Traditional rulers should ordinarily be role models. They are the custodians of the traditions and customs of their people. How can a traditional ruler of a kingdom in Nigeria be in detention in a foreign land? And he is being detained for allegedly masterminding a multi-million dollar fraud against the government of a country in which he once lived and of which he is a citizen! It is morally reprehensible for an Oba to face such allegations. Pray, how will immoral traditional rulers call their people to order when they misbehave? It is even alleged that a number of traditional rulers in Nigeria have pending criminal cases abroad, some of which have been opened and others yet to be opened, and that is the reason some of them cannot travel to certain countries.

This gives the impression that many of the so-called traditional rulers are a bunch of rogues who are unworthy of the exalted thrones they occupy. Some of them are rumoured to engage in illegal mining, while some collude with foreigners to loot the country’s national resources. A few are even accused of collecting money from bandits to set up base in their communities. The treacherous actions of many of them are simply limitless; it is as if their motive for coming to the exalted position is to enrich themselves, abuse their offices and bring disrepute to their own people. But while impunity reigns supreme in this clime, one of them has just found out in faraway US that citizens are obligated to account for their actions, and could be called upon to do so as the need arises, regardless of their status. This is a disgrace to Nigeria, and the government of Osun State should show more than a passing interest in the matter, and do the needful in the fullness of time.

Oba Oloyede has been in FBI custody since 2024, and his continued absence has reportedly stirred worry among the people of Ipetumodu who initially didn’t know his whereabouts. Not a few members of the community are deeply concerned that the Oba had missed some important festivals and rituals which are traditionally believed to be necessary for the spiritual fortification of the community and its people. In the circumstance, the Ipetumodu kingmakers should stand up to be counted and do what the customs, tradition and the law say in situations like this. They should follow due process and reject the influence of money in whatever decisions they take.

Perhaps it should be mentioned that it is the abridgment of the traditional and customary requirements for the selection of traditional rulers that brought some communities into this kind of dire straits in the first place. Thus, apart from a valid claim to the throne, one of the minimum requirements for selecting a prince to mount the saddle should be high standards of character and conduct. This should be ascertained by carrying out due diligence on the antecedents of the concerned princes. And since due diligence on the track records is insufficient to determine with precision what an individual will do in the future, Ifa Corpus was usually enlisted to help inquire into how the reign of any Oba would be, but that has been largely sidetracked.

Today, kingmakers and even Ifa priests are allegedly being swayed by filthy lucre to favour any prince that is ready to dole out huge bribes! It is therefore not surprising to see some Obas engaging in activities that bring opprobrium to the throne, their families, communities and the nation. In the days of yore, Obas who would beat up their wives on the streets, openly use illicit drugs, oppress and assault their subjects, or engage in fraudulent activities would have been screened out through the instrumentality of the Ifa divination.

For instance, kings who would lose wars, not necessarily battles, against the enemies of their communities or bring disrepute to the communities one way or another would not be allowed to ascend the thrones. And if any king misbehaved, he could be asked to commit suicide! The selection process was that stringent and the kingmakers were finicky in those days. And unless there is a reversion to the good old days when money was relegated to the background but hard work, humility, honesty, integrity, valour, probity and vision played a huge role in leadership recruitments, even at the traditional level, the society will continue to select some misfits into offices who will inevitably bring shame and disgrace to the people.

It wasn’t me, IBB’s final maradonic dribble denudes him

0

By Ikeddy Isiguzo

Let us admit it: many of us were waiting for General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida’s book majorly for two issues – the 12 June 1993 election and the 19 October 1986 parcel bomb that shredded the torso of journalist Dele Giwa, Editor-in-Chiefof Newswatch magazine. He died from it, and Moshood Kasimawo Olawale, MKO Abiola, winner of the June 12 presidential election died in detention 12 years after Dele Giwa.

In his book, Journey in Service, his much-awaited memoirs, which Babangida calls his autobiography, he did not let much out. He was faithful to his nickname, Maradona, executing dribbles that served no better purpose than to maintain the mystique about him being impervious though many know he is imperiled by his loyalty to friends.

The Argentine footballer from whom he picked up the moniker Maradona dribbled with a purpose. IBB is different. He prides himself on being Machiavellian. His intellectual group got him to explain his actions with his likeness to Niccolo Machiavelli, a 16th-century Italian diplomat, philosopher, and political theorist whose book The Prince was meant to be a realistic guide to new rulers.

Shocking as The Prince was even centuries ago, it was more shocking to modern readers of the book for Babangida and his loyalists to be proud of the fact that their leader was machiavellian. The key principles of Machiavelli are:
a. Consequentialist morality: Actions are judged by the supposed good consequences they bring to society, rather than by ideals. The end, the principle holds, justifies the means.
b. Mask intentions: Leaders should hide their true intentions from followers as well as critics. Isn’t that a dictatorship?
c. Avoid inconsistency: Leaders should be consistent in their actions even when they are on the road to doom.
d. Act against mercy: Leaders should act against mercy, faith, humanity, frankness, and religion to preserve the State which in any case is theirs.
e. Shape your own fortune: Leaders should use charisma, cunning, and force to shape their own fortune, rather than relying on luck. In all these, the leader thinks of himself first, always.
f. Be feared: Leaders should be dreaded to wade through complex corporate dynamics and destroy those who do not fear them.
g. Manage appearances: Leaders should manage how they appear to others (perception management) and also where they appear for these are among the surprises leaders use to keep their followers in awe of them.
i. Prioritise outcomes: Leaders should prioritise outcomes over other considerations. Nothing, no costs, would be deemed more important than what the leader wants to achieve.
j. Understand adversaries: Leaders should understand their adversaries to navigate complex corporate dynamics. A lot of time and other resources are used to identify enemies and checkmate their moves.

These are the principles IBB was proud to have used in running Nigeria. He was so unpredictable that he was no longer surprised.

Babangida wants to keep himself in the limelight in his twilight years. The crowds that practically shut down Abuja for his book launch were his loyalists who are proof that loyalty is meant to be forever.

Some also earn bragging rights from being seen around Babangida. Others are very grateful for the course that IBB set them on 40 years ago. They were the main cheerleaders on Thursday.

Also in that crowd were those who protested against Babangida’s policies from the Structural Adjustment Programme, SAP, to June 12 or encouraged others to do so.

They all spoke glowingly about Babangida.

IBB let the world know in his book that he was pained by Dele Giwa’s death because he was his friend, intelligent and more pained that people were trying to pin the death on the administration. He blamed Giwa’s lawyer, Gani Fawehinmi and Giwa’s colleagues for hampering investigations into Giwa’s death because they were pointing in one direction: IBB’s administration.

More interesting could be the June 12 election which IBB has just admitted that Abiola won. We knew that long ago. Prof Humphrey Nwosu, Chairman of the National Electoral Commission, told us so 32 years ago. Hundreds of thousands of Nigerians had copies of the result. IBB did not do what he should have done to make the results official, and Abiola, his friend, the President.

IBB staked his innocence through claims that strip him of the acclaim for his bravery, courage, firm control of his administration and the layers of intelligence he built around himself. How could he have lost control of the administration within hours of leaving Abuja for a condolence visit to Katsina?

He just denuded himself after 32 years of hiding behind his fingers.

Most principal characters in the Babangida story are dead. He can tell his story as he pleases. After all, it is his story. He is a great leader, everybody at that event said, particularly those who opposed him.

It was from Babangida that we learnt how powerful Nduka Irabor, Chief Press Secretary to Admiral Augustus Aikhomu, IBB’s Vice-President, was. Babangida said Nduka annulled June 12, reading from a “scrappy” piece of paper that had no presidential imprimatur. Nduka, who Maj-General Muhammadu Buhari jailed under Decree 4 of 1984, with Tunde Thompson, for writing a story Buhari’s administration considered embarrassing, out of jail had acquired enormous powers.

Nduka must have annoyed IBB with the “scrappy” announcement. Babangida retaliated with a national broadcast in which he claimed that the election was compromised, candidates spent over a billion Naira, and there was a conflict of interest among some people in government.

Another way of saying it is that Nduka, a non-member of the Armed Forces Ruling Council, AFRC, a mere civilian, had the temerity to announce the annulment. The announcement so infuriated Babangida that he confirmed it with a national broadcast since he was President, Commander-in-Chief, and Chairman of AFRC, the highest-decision-making body in Nigeria, in 1993.

One is also inclined to blame Nduka for developing Abuja and other otherwise great strides of the administration, which Babangida would deny?

With all the rejoinders IBB has issued to what many had thought was “a great job” that he did, less some raised issues, a better title for the book should have been, “It wasn’t me”, all credits to Shaggy and Rik Rok for that 2000 monster release that centred on a man caught cheating his girlfriend repeating, “It wasn’t me” to every evidence.

Finally…
REVEREND Father Jude Muokwe in Anambra State allegedly slapped and flogged a 50-year-old widow, who works in a school the priest superintends. Her offence? She was leading a meeting of teachers to articulate their demand for a pay raise.

I have heard defences of the priest. Just a question, is flogging a staff, the punishment for holding a meeting? The widow showed her injuries in a viral video on social media. The Catholic Diocese of Awka said it was investigating the incident.

SENATE President Dr. Obong Godswill Akpabio has run into another round of altercations with Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, who Akpabio walked out of the Senate during a row over re-allocated sitting arrangements. Akpabio and Akpoti-Uduaghan had a first clash in July 2024 when Akpabio said she spoke as if she was in a nightclub. Harsh social media reactions forced an apology out of Akpabio.

Earlier in the same month, Akpabio had stopped Senator Ireti Kingibe from moving a motion on the demolition of buildings in the Federal Capital Territory, which is her constituency. Akpabio, in addition, advised Chief Nyesom Wike, FCT Minister to ignore Kingibe. He was later to say the incident was “a miscommunication”.

PA Edwin Clark, elder statesman, a man of great convictions, whose services to Nigeria date back to Mid-Western State, passed on 17 February 2025. All those who hated his guts for fighting for economic, environmental, and social justice for the Niger Delta, now mourn him. Nothing in their mourning suggests that they are not still opposed to the creation of the South-South Development Commission for the Niger Delta. Nigerians know how to play it from all sides.

*ISIGUZO is a major commentator on minor issues

How Simon Guobadia ended up in ICE detention facing deportation after a 43-year battle for U.S. citizenship

Simon Guobadia’s detention after many legal and immigration battles in his pursuit of U.S. citizenship marked a dispiriting end to a 43-year battle to obtain a U.S. citizenship

The detention of the Nigerian-born businessman and estranged husband of reality TV star Porsha Williams follows President Donald Trump’s mass deportation plan, signed into effect earlier this year after he took office. The order allows for the deportation of undocumented immigrants to their home countries.

Recent court filings have shed light on his troubled past, sparking fresh concerns amid his ongoing divorce from Williams, UsWeekly reports.

Guobadia, 60, is currently being detained at Stewart Detention Center in Lumpkin, Georgia, with his status listed as “in ICE custody” by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

This development comes after years of unsuccessful attempts to secure U.S. citizenship, with court documents revealing a history of visa overstays, identity fraud, and multiple rejections of his naturalization applications.

Guobadia’s immigration woes date back to his initial arrival in the United States on August 11, 1982, on a six-month visitor visa. He overstayed his visa, leading to a 1985 deportation order after his application for U.S. citizenship was denied. Despite this, Guobadia voluntarily left the country but re-entered the U.S. in 1986 under another six-month visa, only to overstay once again.

His most recent denial of U.S. citizenship came in July 2022, prompting a legal battle against the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).

Court documents reveal that Guobadia filed a civil case on January 11, 2024, challenging the repeated denials of his naturalization application.

He sued top officials from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), including Director UR Mendoza Jaddou and Shineka Miller, Director of the USCIS Atlanta Field Office.

Guobadia’s application for naturalization was denied on July 27, 2022, with immigration officials citing fraudulent activity and past criminal offences.

His history of legal troubles dates back to the 1980s, with allegations of identity fraud and multiple arrests for crimes such as bank and credit card fraud, unauthorized vehicle use, and additional fraud-related charges.

Despite these challenges, Guobadia has persisted in his pursuit of U.S. citizenship. His initial application was denied in 2016, with the USCIS citing that his original resident status was “unlawfully granted.” He faced further denials in 2020 and 2022 before challenging the decision in 2023, only to be rejected once again in early 2024.

His detention by ICE in February 2025 has added another layer to his ongoing battle for citizenship.

Guobadia’s citizenship issues have garnered renewed attention amid his impending divorce from Real Housewives of Atlanta star Porsha Williams. Although sources close to the couple claim that the split is unrelated to his legal troubles, the timing has sparked speculation.

Guobadia’s relationship with Williams began in April 2021, and they got engaged just a month later. They tied the knot in 2022, following his highly publicized divorce from his ex-wife, Falynn Guobadia. The couple’s whirlwind romance was marred by controversy, with many questioning the timing of their relationship.

In 2023, Guobadia began relocating some of his investments to Dubai, United Arab Emirates, potentially due to concerns over his immigration status. Despite his legal challenges, Guobadia has built a successful business career in Atlanta, with holdings in various industries, including oil and gas, renewable energy, manufacturing, and commodities trading. He also has investments in several local businesses, such as The Republic, DAS BBQ II, and American Cut Steakhouse.

In a 2022 interview with Authority Magazine, Guobadia expressed his passion for the restaurant industry, highlighting his entrepreneurial spirit and business acumen.

Guobadia has been married three times, with his most recent union being with Porsha Williams, which has been surrounded by controversy. Guobadia is a father of five children, Quentin, Nicole, Christian, Benjamin, and Ximena, from his previous relationships.

In a heartfelt 2022 Instagram post, he acknowledged and thanked the mothers of his children for their cooperation and support in co-parenting.

Porsha Williams, on the other hand, has a daughter named PJ from her previous relationship with entrepreneur Dennis McKinley.

His detention could lead to deportation to Nigeria or prolonged legal battles to resolve his immigration status in the U.S. More broadly, the case highlights challenges within U.S. immigration policy, including the complexities of naturalization for long-term residents with complicated immigration backgrounds.

Porsha Williams, former star of The Real Housewives of Atlanta, has spoken out following the detention of her estranged husband, Guobadia, by immigration officials.

“It’s disheartening to see my estranged husband make choices that have led to this outcome,” Williams, 43, shared in an Instagram statement on Friday, February 21.

“At this moment, my priority is moving forward with my family.”

A review of IBB’s book of billions

0

By Lasisi Olagunju

In five parts, thirteen chapters, six appendices, including an interview; a prologue and an epilogue, he sought to give a definite definition of himself. But, for me, the deepest insight into the person of General Ibrahim Babangida is not in his expensive book (it fetched him billions; I bought a copy for N40,000). The greatest revelation was at the launch of the book in Abuja. His comrade-in-arms and childhood friend, General Abdulsalami Abubakar, revealed that a cleric told them about 80 years ago that Babangida would one day be president of his country.

Now, when you, a seer, tell a child that he would be king one day, the palace cannot be safe until the child becomes man and he becomes king – or he dies. We read exactly that in Shakespeare’s story of the Scottish General, Macbeth. Three witches tell Macbeth that he will be King of Scotland. Macbeth becomes impatient; he kills the reigning king and takes the throne. Because of the security of his throne, paranoia pushes King Macbeth to take other desperate measures. People die; civil war erupts, and more people die. Darkness falls. Please, go back and read again your Macbeth.

My people have several proverbs and sayings on royalty and fate. They say one’s destiny makes one a king but one’s character dethrones one (Orí ẹni ni í fini j’ọba, ìwà èyàn ni í yọ èyàn l’óyè). Like Macbeth, IBB joined the army and rose to become a General. Again, like Macbeth, the Thane of Cawdor prophecy came true for Babangida and he became Chief of Army Staff. Finally, like Macbeth, he became king and pronounced himself president and proceeded to do as Macbeth did until he left almost the Macbeth way. If you had been wondering why the amiable General from Minna chose ‘president’ as his official title, now you know it was in fulfillment of a prophecy.

Babangida once named his heroes: Zulu’s Emperor Chaka and General Hannibal of Carthage. Read again about those Generals, their careers and their exploits, their end. Read page 121 of IBB’s book and decide if you are convinced by his reasons for not answering what all his predecessors answered: Head of State. He says in the book that he chose to be different not because he wanted to copy Turkey’s General Kemal Ataturk or Emperor Chaka the Great. He says he chose to be ‘president’ as a demonstration of his commitment to “our suspended constitution.”

Babangida’s feet walked corridors of power; he befriended, and ‘charmed’ power even before he installed Buhari as Head of State in December 1983. His feet took him, or he took his feet everywhere his inner head (his Ori Inu) could be found. He was intrepid, smooth and daring. I read Shehu Shagari’s autobiography, ‘Beckoned to Serve’ published in 2001: “In late October or early November 1983, Major General Babangida and Colonel Aliyu Mohammed came to the State House to see me and we had a long discussion. They did pay me such visits usually at night long before I became President.” Shagari had that recorded on page 497 of his own autobiography. You are likely to ask what IBB was looking for in Shagari’s home at night. The way Babangida walked hallways of power was the way persons kept awake by destiny walked, restlessly.

In the Foreword to Babangida’s book written by his boss, General Yakubu Gowon, we gain better discernment on the labyrinth called IBB. The older General describes Babangida as “a natural leader but also a devoted follower.” Sun Tzu, in ‘The Art of War’ tells Generals: “Appear weak when you are strong, and strong when you are weak.” Is that why President Babangida is read in the book bossing and, at the same time, bowing to his army chief, General Sani Abacha, in double-quick manner? Many commentators have said that his June 12 account is a mesh of courage and cowardice. ‘Abacha did this, Abacha did that but I regrettably take full responsibility for everything that happened’!

Here, before you abuse IBB as a General without biceps, know that he did not walk alone. Apart from Murtala Muhammed who came fast and left fast, every military regime we had had its internal tormentor. For Gowon, it was Murtala Muhammed who was both boy and boss to the boss. All accounts say Gowon ruled under Murtala’s shadows until the kingmaker said enough and took the crown from Gowon alias Jack. Read the Gowon/Murtala story in Theophilus Akindele’s ‘Memoir of Mixed Blessings’ – especially the contract controversies. In his own book, Babangida says Murtala Muhammed, in Gowon’s government, “was quite a handful in matters pertaining to control” (page 85). IBB himself played the Murtala role to Muhammadu Buhari, 1984-85. He made the lanky General from Daura sit on the throne then shoved him off the seat because of his “excesses.” It should, therefore, not shock the reader that Abacha was the captain of the ship who allowed IBB to be there until the groom was ready for the bride. Babangida’s ‘A Journey in Service’ tears the mask.

Somewhere in that book, like a river nearing its sea, for whatever reasons, IBB reproduced (introduced) a 1995 interview he granted TELL magazine, and it reads like a summary of the entire IBB story. At a point in the interview, TELL magazine editors remind him of how he dealt ruthlessly with them and their magazine, IBB asks “What happened to TELL? TELL? Seriously, what happened?” He is told that over half a million copies of TELL were seized, and some of the editors speaking with him there were arrested. His response: “You see, when I sat up there, I didn’t know most of these things that happened…At times, the information only reached me later.” If what he said here is true, for a man who boasted that he was trained to dominate his environment, the fact that big things happened in his government without his knowledge could only tell how hopelessly imprisoned people of power could be.

Some people’s luck or escape route is in dying young. One loud example is General Murtala Muhammed. Would he be the hero he is if he had ruled for three, four years? Nigeria would definitively have happened to him. Unlike Murtala, some other people are very lucky to live hard and live long. Babangida is one of such. He is 83 years old. Imagine if he had died when his enemy, Muhammadu Buhari, was president. He would not have made the loud statement he made in Abuja last week! Or worse, if he had died during the June 12 crisis. He lived those bloody moments and validated Musician Odolaye Aremu’s theory that “if we don’t die young, enemies of fifteen years will become our friends.” At his book launch last week, his enemies and friends dropped offerings at his altar. NADECO man, Bola Tinubu, described him as “visionary Babangida.” Gowon in the Foreword declares that “in the post-Civil War period, his (IBB’s) tenure in office is easily the most remarkable.” That is an interesting verdict. Almost five of those post-Civil War years belong to Gowon himself. Some people are very good at scoring own goals.

In language and structure, I find this book by IBB to be very solid and uncomplicated. But, certainly, the most contentious of the content of the book is the June 12 story. And, the author’s treatment of the matter is the most extensive – almost 40 pages. Very unlike IBB, he named his friend, Sani Abacha, as the head of the forces that cancelled the election. But the annulment was just a culmination of a long, dark, bad process triggered by IBB himself long before the election was held. He said he was away in Katsina when Abacha and his boys annulled the election. But IBB came back from Katsina; why didn’t he undo what Abacha did? If he did anything at all, it is not in the book. Instead, what we see are hand-wringing cliches on the annulment and its consequences. The Abacha family is angry, furious; Abiola’s people are not impressed; they wondered why he waited for ‘all’ his witnesses to die before coming out. But what he wrote is no news. What is news is that those facts are directly from IBB himself. Snippets of what he said were in the media of that period. And we heard all sorts of weird things in newsrooms, the scrambling for and partitioning of power. For instance, we heard (or read) that Abacha, one heated meeting day, followed General Joshua Dogonyaro to the toilet and told him: “Let IBB go and we remain.” And Dogonyaro’s reply was “Who are the we?” Soldiers are great followers of Sun Tzu: “in the midst of chaos, there is opportunity.”

Professor Omo Omoruyi was one of the key architects of IBB’s transition programme and, perhaps, the closest to IBB in the dark days of the annulment. In 1999, Omoruyi published ‘The Tale of June 12: The Betrayal of the Democratic Rights of Nigerians’. It is his account of the June 12 tragedy. More than twenty-five years after it was published, I have not read anyone that is mentioned in the book coming out to say the professor lied. So, I take Omoruyi’s account of the pre and post-annulment events as reliable. He claims in his book (page 37) that the June 12 election “was aborted by forces external to its design.”

He is more direct on page 257: “General Abacha felt humiliated when General Babangida yielded to the US pressure to order on June 11, 1993 that the June 12 election must go on. From that June 11, General Abacha showed no interest in the matter and waited for when it would crash…It was Lt.-General Alani Akinrinade, a former Chief of Defence Staff and an experienced professional officer, who read the situation right in the interview he granted to reporters in October 1993 when he said that ‘Shonekan is a mask…the masquerade itself is the armed forces and Abacha is the personification of that masquerade.’ See TELL, November 1, 1993. p.25.”

Omoruyi accuses IBB of betraying his country and its people with his disruptive handling of the last leg of the transition programme. He says IBB lost control of the military and the government soon after the election held. He said Babangida was in a fix as of 9.30 p.m. on 21 June, 1993 when he met him. His book (page 162 – 164) quotes the General copiously: “I see disaster for myself and my family. Where do I go from here?” Omoruyi quotes IBB as confirming that Abiola won the election but that “they” would kill him if he allowed the results to stay. Omoruyi wrote further that at the end of that outburst, Babangida made a telling remark. He quotes him as saying “I told you that I am a prisoner. What do I do? I think I need a psychiatrist” (page 171). Two days after all these, the annulment announcement was made via an unsigned, undated paper circulated to the media through the Vice President’s office.

Can we, at this point, ask journalist Nduka Irabor to come out and tell the world who gave him the unsigned annulment statement that he released to the world on 23 June 1993? He can no longer be quiet.

Now, if Abacha emitted such negative vibrations in his government, why did Babangida leave him behind after retiring himself and all service chiefs? IBB offers no cogent reason for this in his ‘A Journey in Service’. Instead, what we read is his admission of “a grave mistake” in retaining Abacha as chairman of the joint Chief of Staff and “as enforcer-in-chief for the new government” of Ernest Shonekan. Omoruyi addresses the same issue better in his own book (page 257): “In response to my question as to who would guard the guards after August 26, 1993, he (Babangida) said he would remove the operational control from him (Abacha) and assign it to Lt.-General Joshua Dogonyaro.” It is interesting that IBB thought that running into Dogonyaro’s fire was a better option to staying in Abacha’s fire. In any case, Abacha sacked Dogonyaro and all other “guards” soon after Babangida stepped aside. The other arms of the IBB boys, he used them to get rid of Shonekan and his Interim National Government (ING). He then cavalierly gave them the tissue paper treatment – he used, dumped and flushed them down the drain.

We saw a convergence of all the forces in Abuja last week. NADECO and the military factions swam in open adultery. They wined and partied and gave the General of Generals a generous pat on the back. One of my university classmates described the Abuja event as “not funny.” Her post to me dripped with so much pain. She told tales of death and dying and suffering. She gave accounts of personal experiences and sacrifices. She felt betrayed.

I begged her to let me include her tears here without mentioning her name: “I watched the launch of the book written by IBB and took a cursory look at the parade of eminent personalities in attendance. I listened to the speeches one after the other and saw them laughing. I was stunned that people therein, one after the other, eulogized IBB. I thought for a moment that I was in another planet or that I had mental issues by asking myself if these people were describing the same events that I witnessed as a 26-year-old spinster living in Lagos and trying to chart a course for the future. Significantly, I remember how I walked from Aguda in company of a friend to queue up and vote at Adebola Street, off Bode Thomas in Surulere, Lagos and walked back home.

I remember sitting at the reception of the school of nursing on Awolowo Road waiting to collect my sister’s transcript when an elderly woman fainted on hearing the news of the annulment. I recall her colleagues trying to revive her and crying at the same time that their hope for a better Nigeria had just been dashed. I remember having woken up early one morning to go to work and arriving in Norman Williams in Ikoyi only to realize that Lagos was on lockdown and going back home became an arduous task. I remember getting a ride through the Third Mainland Bridge to Obanikoro and walking back home in Aguda, dodging bullets and escaping area boys who took advantage of the situation. I survived but some did not. What I saw in that hall last week was a mockery of those who died and of those of us who did not die but are yet to recover from the trauma of that period. It is not funny!”

My friend spoke for millions seething helplessly in the dimly lit parlours of their lives. But, there must be a closure, and I think that was what that Abuja gathering thought it was doing. For those who are angry and crying betrayal, I give what I gave my friend – a quote: “Whatever happens, stay alive. Don’t die before you’re dead.” Some say the quote is from English writer, Virginia Woolf; some others credit Polish writer and Nobel Laureate, Olga Tokarczuk. Whoever the writer is between those two ladies gave a valuable advice. “Whatever happens, stay alive.”

Daedalus was a mythical sculptor who lived in Athens. In one desperate moment, the man threw a stone at a bird and killed it; the stone ricocheted and killed a second bird. With the feathers, he and his son created wings with which they escaped from detention in a high tower which they had helped their tormentor to design. That appears to be the objective of General Ibrahim Babangida’s autobiography. To kill many birds with one lone stone. Still all storms; settle all scores; explain all controversies; and they are many: OIC membership, Dele Giwa’s death, Mamman Vatsa’s coup, the C-130 Plane Crash, the Gideon Orkar Coup, June 12; the SAP riots, Gulf Oil Windfall. The author thoroughly explains and analyses these as “challenges of leadership” all across the 420 pages, some from page 203 to 220. But, has he succeeded in getting these cases closed? Dirty water may quench fire but if you want to fight fire, you don’t wear clothes made of dry grass. Has Babangida’s book helped him to calm or further enrage the sea? Well, in Chinua Achebe’s words, it is “morning yet on creation day.”