Home Blog Page 866

#NBAAGC2020: Let’s Act Instead Of Complaining About Issues Plaguing Our Country — Firstbank’s Chairman, Ibukun Awosika

0

The Chairman, Board of Directors, First Bank of Nigeria, Ibukun Awosika wants Nigerians to take their destiny in their own hands and build the country.

Awosika who was speaking during the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) 2020 Conference on Tuesday, believes that instead of complaining about issues plaguing the country, Nigerians, particularly lawyers, would have to take extra steps to address those challenges.

“With all due respect and no offence meant,” she said, “I just want us to know that for us to build a nation we all dream of, the one we complain about every day, we are going to have to go outside of ourselves; we are going to have to decide that enough is enough and it is time to use everything that we have to make a difference.”

According to her, the NBA should take stock of its activities since existence and reflect on the impact the body has had over the years.

For the banker, the NBA has all it takes to be a major building block in the country, citing their knowledge and expertise as well as number.

“For sixty years with thousands of members, with thousands of lawyers and many new lawyers graduating every year, how has the country been fully impacted by the knowledge that we have and the understanding that we possess in terms of building an equitable country where justice reigns? she asked.

Awosika added that whether at the political or judicial level, the NBA, has “the strength of number, we have the capacity through knowledge. We have the power of influence at every level.”

‘Am I a Nigerian?’

This year’s NBA conference runs from August 24-26, 2020, and will have several dignitaries including Vice President Yemi Osinbajo and the Attorney-General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami (SAN), in attendance.

The event will also see the former Governor of Anambra State, Peter Obi; Governor Nyesom Wike of Rivers State and a former Education Minister, Obiageli Ezekwesili speaking.

According to the NBA, the theme of this year’s conference is: ‘Am I a Nigerian – A Debate on National Identity, the Indigeneship-Citizenship Conundrum.”

FEC Approves N722.3m For Audit Of NDDC

0

The Federal Executive Council has approved N722.3 million for eight field forensic auditors to audit the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC).

The payment will come directly from the Presidency as the National Assembly is on break and the 2020 budget for the NDDC has not been passed.

Channels Television learned the field auditors will also look into the 12,000 abandoned projects in the Niger Delta.

The Minister of Niger Delta, Mr Godwill Akpabio, disclosed this on Wednesday after the virtual FEC meeting presided over by President Muhammadu Buhari.

The NDDC became a subject of controversy over allegations of corruption in the award of contracts and the non-payment of Nigerian scholars under the payroll of the commission.

Following this, the National Assembly invited Akpabio and the NDDC boss, Daniel Pondei to probe the activities of the agency.

Appearing before the House of Representatives Committee on NDDC in a public hearing on July 20, Akpabio accused the lawmakers of benefitting from most contracts awarded by the commission.

However, this did not go down well them as the Speaker of the House, Femi Gbajabiamila threatened a legal action should the Minister fail to name the purported lawmakers involved in the contracts.

The House also asked Akpabio, to publish the names of the members of the National Assembly who got contracts.

In a statement issued on July 28, the spokesman for the House and Committee Chairman on Media Affairs and Publicity, Benjamin Kalu, said that the minister had alleged that 60 percent of all the NDDC projects were awarded to members of the lawmakers between the months of January and May 2020.

Kalu explained that following the claim, the leadership of the 9th House issued a 48-hour ultimatum to Akpabio to publish a list of the lawmakers.

The House spokesman revealed that the lawmakers evaluated the minister’s letter and the directive to press charges against him have not been lifted.

Also, President Buhari reacted to the controversy trailing both the commission and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

The President who spoke after the Sallah service on July 31, said some people trusted by his administration have abused the privilege.

Senate Directs AGF To Probe $18bn NLNG Dividends

97

Senate Joint Committee on Finance and National Planning has directed the Accountant General of the Federation (AGF), Ahmed Idris, to investigate the payment of $18.323billion being dividends accrued to the country from the Nigeria Liquefied Natural Gas (NLNG) Limited, between 2004 and 2020.

Chairman of the Committee, Senator Solomon Adeola, gave the directive following disclosures from NLNG officials during the panel’s stakeholders’ interactive session on the 2021-2023 Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) and Fiscal Strategy Paper (FSP), in Abuja.

Adeola, according to a statement by his Special Adviser on Media, Kayode Odunaro, in Abuja, the AGF was mandated to investigate the amount was actually remitted to the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) and how much was actually remitted to the Federation Account.

The AGF was also to determine if there was any deduction by NNPC, how much was deducted and who authorized the deductions as well as the exchange rates that applied for the amount that was remitted over the years under reference.

According to the statement, Mrs. Eyono Fatai-William, the general manager (External Relations and Sustainable Development) of NLNG had presented a financial summary of the company from 1999-2019 and said the NLNG had paid a dividend of over $18 billion to Nigeria between 2004 and 2019.

Fatai-William also insisted that the NLNG is committed to a culture of transparency and integrity.

However, when Adeola asked the Accountant General of the Federation, to confirm if the dividend was actually paid into the Federation Account, he said it was difficult to immediacy determines if it had been paid because the dividend is usually paid to the NNPC – that represents the Federal Government in the NLNG.

Adeola therefore directed the Accountant General to investigate the payment and report back to the Senate within two weeks.

Nigeria has about 53 per cent shares in the NLNG, according to the statement.

Katsina Court orders arrest of DSS officers for assaulting lawyer

0

A Senior magistrate court of Katsina State in Funtua has issued a bench warrant for the arrest of two (2) officers in the Department of State Services (DSS) in Katsina State namely Ibrahim Abubakar and Usman Abubakar for assaulting a practicing lawyer, Naziru Suleiman Esq.

“Their arrest warrant was due to their absence before the court without satisfactorily excusing themselves, which constitute disrespect to the court and therefore a contempt”, as quoted in the order.

In the court order seen by Katsina Post dated 12th of August and signed by Shamsu Umar, the magistrate court asked the Commissioner of Police Katsina State to effect the arrest under the provisions of Sections 24 (1) and 30 (f) and 62(1) of ACJL Katsina State.

“The Court having heard the Application for the bench warrant against the defendants from the learned counsel to the complainant for the absence of defendants before the court for their trial.

“The Court is of the view that the application is of merit by the following reasons: Firstly, as rightly stated by the learned Counsel for the Complainant, this case is a criminal before the Court and the presence of the defendants is necessary couple with the fact that the duplicate of the Court summon is signed by one Abubakar Abdullahi of DSS Office Katsina on 5 August 2020.

“Also that the Court bailiff have sworn to an Affidavit of Service to the effect of carrying out the service as ordered by the Honourable Court which request the Director DSS Office in Katsina to serve the defendants who are his personnel serving at Funtua Office for their appearance before this Honourable Court for their trial.

“Their absence today before this Honourable court without satisfactorily excusing themselves, Constitute to disrespect to the Honourable Court and therefore a contempt, accordingly bench warrant is hereby issued against the defendants, the arrest warrant shall be issued to Commissioner of Police Katsina State to effect the arrest under the provisions of Sections 24 (1) and 30 (f) and 62(1) of ACJL Katsina State 2019.

“The case is adjourn to 27″ of August 2020 for Mention.”

The arrest warrant was issued following application for direct criminal complaint of criminal conspiracy 59 (2), assault or criminal force 237, criminal intimidation 373, (a) and use of insulting or abusive language contrary to section 375 and 372 penal code by a team of fifteen (15) lawyers led by Lawal Amah Esq dated 14th July, 2020 before the court requesting for criminal summons to against the Defendants.

“Kindly cause a criminal summons to issue against the Defendants on the following terms:

“The Complainant in the course of discharging his constitutional duties. On the 10” July, 2020 at about 6:02pm went to the office of department of state services (DSS) to accompany his client invited by the department.

“On reaching the department office at Funtua The Complainant was accosted by the Defendants To the extent that the defendant slapped the Complainant and pushed him out of his office as if that is not enough, they went on to intimidate and insult the Complainant by uttering the following word:

“Dan ubanka ka fita duk wanda zaka gaya mawa, ka gaya mashi nan ba katu bace” meaning: “This is not court of law, go and tell anybody you so wish”.

“Na bugi banza, rubuce-rubuce ne suje suyi, ba abinda zai faru, Meaning:

“I have beaten an idiot and that nothing will happen let them write to anywhere”.

“Your worship it is on these premise we are lodging a Complaint of criminal conspiracy 59 (2) assault or criminal force 237 criminal intimidation 373 (a) and use of insulting or abusive, language contrary to section 375 and 172 Penal Code Law Katsina State 2019”.

katsinapost

Should Landlord Stop Rent-Owing Tenants From Moving Out?

Daily Law Tips (Tip 640) by Onyekachi Umah, Esq., LL.M, ACIArb(UK)

Should Landlord Stop Rent-Owing Tenants from Moving Out?.

In life you are either a tenant or a landlord and in some cases both. Many tenancy relationships go south with tenants failing to pay rents for years or landlords being rude and violating rights of tenants. The rate of landlords seeking to recover backlogs of unpaid rents (debts) from their tenants and former tenants is increasing geometrically across Nigeria. It is common to see cases of tenants who moved out of property “nicodemusly” (secretly) and ran away with unpaid rents. Often, bold rent-owing tenants or tenants that damaged any property get stopped by their landlords (using law enforcement agents, estate security and louts/thugs), when such tenants attempt to vacate property. This work focuses on whether a landlord should stop a tenant from vacating his property for any reason whatsoever.

Most tenancy agreements in Nigeria are made orally, with majority of rents being below One Million Naira (N1,000,000) (ie., $2,777) per year. Since landlords are prohibited from forcing tenants out of their property, the only way to recover rent or eject a tenant is by serving valid Notices (like, Notice to Quit and Notice of Landlord’s Intention to Recover Property) and then suing tenant in court. However, while landlord may be engaging tenant in a legal warfare, in some cases, tenant may elope from property abandoning his unpaid rent. Generally, without social security numbers, reliable house address system and records, most persons in Nigeria cannot be easily tracked/accessed. So, many are the losses of landlords in tenancy relationships in Nigeria. However, a hybrid tenancy agreement will reduce the troubles of a landlord. Click their link to learn more on Hybrid Tenancy Agreement.

There are fundamental human rights in Nigeria and there are rights that every person, institution or agency must respect. Among the human rights in Nigeria are; Right to dignity of human person, Right to Personal Liberty, Right to private and family life, Right to Freedom of thought, Conscience and Religion, Right to peaceful assembly and association, and Right to Freedom of Movement. Harassing, intimidating and force a rent-owing tenant or any person to remain in a property (not allowing such person to move out) by a landlord or his agents (including law enforcement agents and louts) is a violation of the above listed human rights. Owing rent/debt or having a case in court or an investigation at any law enforcement agency is not an excuse/justification for such violation. Violation of any human right comes with huge consequences as will be shown below.

Below is how stopping any tenant from moving out of property, translates to violation of fundamental human rights in Nigeria:

1. Where a landlord stops a tenant from moving out of property for any reason whatsoever, it is often an ugly sight. The tenant is often forced to stay back against his wish with unimaginable force, verbal abuse, harassment and intimidation. These are signs of torture, inhuman and degrading treatment. The tenant at that point is treated less than a human being. This is a violation of “Right to Dignity of Human Person”.
2. Where a landlord stops a tenant from moving out of property for any reason whatsoever, the personal liberty of the tenant is violated. Since the tenant is not allowed to move out, his liberty is violated illegally without any court order or reasonable suspicion of a crime. Moving out of property is not a proof of attempting to run away with debt and even running away with debt or from landlord (creditor) is not a crime in Nigeria. So, stopping a tenant from moving out of a property is a violation of the tenant’s “Right to Personal Liberty”.
3. Where a landlord stops a tenant from moving out of property for any reason whatsoever, it often involves unlawful use of law enforcement agents, estate security and louts to keep tenant in his property. The law enforcement agents, estate security and louts of landlord, supervise home, correspondence, and communication of the tenant. This is a violation of tenant’s “Right to Private and Family life”.
4. Where a landlord stops a tenant from moving out of property for any reason whatsoever, movement of tenant is restricted and his personal space violated. Often the violators (landlord and his agents) will not permit the tenant to effectively use or leave the property or to leave with his personal belongings. This may affect the tenants access to his religious group/building and tenant’s desire to manifestly propagate his religion or belief in worship, teaching, practise and observance. Clearly this translates to violation of “Right to Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion”.
5. Where a landlord stops a tenant from moving out of property for any reason whatsoever, this may include landlord stopping the tenant from hosting visitors and groups. Many landlords want by all means, to embarrass the tenant and muscle the tenant to pay rent, this may include chasing away guests of tenant or not allowing tenant to leave and attend meetings and events. Stopping a tenant from freely assembling and associating with any person is a violation of human rights. Specifically, it is a violation of “Right to peaceful assembly and association”.
6. Where a landlord stops a tenant from moving out of property for any reason whatsoever, there is an obvious restriction of movement of tenant. Every citizen of Nigeria is entitled to move freely throughout Nigeria and to also reside in any part of Nigeria. Where a tenant is stopped from moving out, such tenant’s movement is unlawfully limited and he is also being forced to reside in a part of Nigeria against his wish. This is an unlawful violation of “Right to Freedom of Movement”.

The above six (6) fundamental human rights that landlords violate when stopping a tenant from moving out of property, are sacrosanct, unshakable and untouchable by landlords. Hence, any violation by a landlord will ignite serious legal consequences. Fundamental human rights are constitutional rights and only a court of law (or any person acting under an order of court or under a federal law), that can lawfully limit or restrict them. Click this link to see what human rights can be legally restricted in Nigeria. Hence, no person, company, institution, landlords, tenants, law enforcement agencies/agents, community, association or group can attempt to or violate the fundamental human rights of a tenant for any reason whatsoever.

Where a tenant’s fundamental human right is violated, the tenant or his well-wishers (family, supporters or any person whatsoever) can sue the landlord and his agents (including any person involved; like law enforcement agency/agent or estate security) in court for enforcement of human rights. Courts in Nigeria attend to cases of fundamental human rights very fast, and such cases can be ended in less than 3 months. Among other things, courts will award huge damages (monetary fines amounting to millions of Naira) against the landlord and his agents to be paid to the tenant. Also, cases for trespass and recovery of losses or damaged items belonging to the tenant can be brought before a court against the landlord and his agent. Tenants are encouraged to speak to their lawyers!
 
My authorities are:

1. Sections 34, 35, 37, 38, 40, 41, 45 and 46 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999.
2. Sections 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 19 and 20 of the Recovery of Premises Act 1945, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria (ABUJA) and other similar tenancy laws across the states in Nigeria.

#SabiLaw
#DailyLawTips
#SabiBusinessLaw
#SabiElectionLaws
#SabiHumanRights
#SabiLawOnBeatFm
#SabiLawLectureSeries
#CriminalJusticeMonday
#SabiLawVideoChallenge

Speak with the writer, ask questions or make inquiries on this topic or any other via [email protected] or [email protected] or +2348037665878. To receive our free Daily Law Tips, follow our Facebook Page:@LearnNigerianLaws, Instagram: @LearnNigerianLaws and Twitter: @LearnNigeriaLaw

Please share this publication for free till it gets to those that need it most. Save a Nigerian today! NOTE: Sharing, modifying or publishing this publication without giving credit to Onyekachi Umah, Esq. and “LearnNigerianLaws.com” is a criminal breach of copyright and will be prosecuted.

This publication is the writer’s view not a legal advice and does not create any form of relationship. You may reach the writer for more information.

Powered by www.LearnNigerianLaws.com {A Free Law Awareness Program of Sabi Law Foundation, supported by the law firm of Bezaleel Chambers International (BCI).}

Intra Union Dispute: Industrial Court assumes jurisdiction, dismisses objection for lacking merit

0

The Vacation Judge, Lagos Judicial division of the National Industrial Court, His Lordship, Hon. Justice Isaac Essien has dismissed the preliminary objection filed by the National President- National Union Of Food, Beverage And Tobacco Employees, Comrade Lateef Oyelekan and 18 others challenging the jurisdiction of the Court to hear the matter brought by Comrade Abiodun Philip and 29 others for lacking merit.

The Court held that an intra union dispute which relates to the interpretation and application of the constitution of the union can be filed in the court and the court is vested with original jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter.

From facts, the Applicant had filed a preliminary objection sought for an order striking out/dismissing the suit for want of jurisdiction on the grounds that the case is an intra-union dispute which must be subjected to the provisions of the Trade Dispute Act, that the subject matter has been apprehended by the minister of Labour and Employment and the suit discloses no reasonable cause of action and also abuse of court process.

In response, Comrade Abiodun Philip and 29 others argued that by the content of the affidavit and the prayers sought for in the originating summons, the suit discloses a reasonable cause of action urged the court to dismiss the objection.

In his ruling, the presiding Judge, Justice Essien held that where the subject matter of intra union dispute revolves around or relates to the interpretation and application of a trade union constitution, that the court has original jurisdiction to hear any suit brought in that respect.

“It is, therefore, logical to say that intra union dispute cannot be brought to this court in its original jurisdiction. However, once the intra union dispute relates to the interpretation and application of the constitution of a trade union, S.2(1) of the Trade Dispute Act must bow to the superior authority of the constitution, this leads us to what was the subject matter of the originating process.”

Visit Judgment’s Portal for full ruling.

Group Makes Move To Seek Court Order Stopping Akpata’s Inauguration As NBA President; Sets Up Committee For Creation Of Rival Body To NBA.

0

A group has resolved to truncate the forthcoming inauguration of the NBA President-elect, Mr. Olumide Akpata by securing an injunctive order of a Court through a “friendly” Judge.

This was a resolution at a virtual meeting of the Group held on 20th day of August, 2020 which was attended by prominent Lawyers in Nigeria.

This development is coming in the wake of the keenly contested July 2020 NBA elections.

The Group appears to have taken over sectional platform to vent their misgivings and legitimize their grievances about the election.

It gathered that at the virtual meeting, the Group, while claiming that the election which had over 19,000 lawyers voting was a fraud, boasted that they will use the instrumentality of Nigerian court system to truncate the inauguration scheduled for 29th August 2020.

A source disclosed that the meeting was attended by one of the contestants in the concluded elections with his supporters who are prominent Lawyers.

At the meeting, these prominent supporters made it clear that they were perfecting plans to obtain an injunctive relief from a friendly judge.

The meeting attendees further resolved to create a rival body to the NBA. Particularly, the prominent supporters were in a hurry to approve a new draft constitution for the Group and concluded that it was time to form a parallel body to the NBA.

They set this in motion by setting up a committee to finalize the details the constitution of this parallel organisation.

In a related development, a prominent Lawyer, had at the meeting boasted of rallying some first-class traditional rulers to call the Ooni of Ife and impress on him not to receive the NBA President-Elect at his palace two Sundays ago.

This development is worrisome, and it appears the intent is targeted at frustrating the efforts of the President-Elect of the NBA and his team as they gear up for the commencement of the new administration.

Lawyers and indeed Nigerians are hoping that the Group will allow reason to prevail and desist from the path being towed for the good of the NBA.

Falana Writes FG, Demands Release Of Some Correctional Centre’s Inmates Who Were Pardoned By Thailand Government

0

When Henry Azukaeme Titus, George Chibuike Onyeama, Kennedy Tanya, Yakubu Yahuza Mohammed and Mrs Gloria Ogbonna (Chola Mulenga for style) and Wasiu Amusan also called John Smith were jailed for drug related offences in Thailand, they thought it was their end! However, that country granted them amnesty and, through the treaty that exists between Thailand and Nigeria, the prisoners were sent to Nigeria.

However, the Nigerian authorities have since kept them in Kirikiri Maximum Security correctional centre.

According to Falana: “Our clients were convicted in Thailand for drug-related offences at various times between 1998 and 2006. They were however transferred from Thailand to the Kirikiri Maximum Correctional Centre to complete their prison terms following the Prison Exchange Treaty of 2012 between the Kingdom of Thailand and the Federal Government of Nigeria. Section 5 of the said Prison Exchange Treaty stipulates that the transferring State i.e. Thailand “shall retain exclusive jurisdiction regarding the judgments of its court, the sentences imposed by them and any procedures for revision, modification or cancellation of those judgments and sentences.”

“Pursuant to the said Treaty our client were granted general amnesty under the Thai Royal Amnesty Decree in 2016 and 2019. But due to undisclosed reasons the authorities of the Nigerian Correctional Services have refused to release our clients from unlawful incarceration notwithstanding that they have been pardoned under the Thai Royal Amnesty Decree. However, having obtained copies of the Royal Amnesty documents from the Government of Thailand through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, we are pained to know our clients ought to have been released from prison custody at various times between 2010 and 2019.”

Below is Falana’s letter Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola, Minister of Interior, Ministry of Interior:

August 25, 2020

Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola,
Honourable Minister of Interior,
Ministry of Interior,
Old Federal Secretariat Complex,
Garki,
Abuja, FCT.

Dear Ogbeni Aregbesola,

REQUEST FOR THE IMMEDIATE RELEASE OF (1) HENRY AZUKAEME TITUS (2) GEORGE CHIBUIKE ONYEAMA (3) KENNEDY TANYA (4) YAKUBU YAHUZA MOHAMMED AND (5) MRS GLORIA OGBONNA a.k.a CHOLA MULENGA AND (6) WASIU AMUSAN a.k.a JOHN SMITH FROM PRISON CUSTODY

We are Solicitors to the above named convicted prison inmates who are currently held in custody at the Kirikiri Maximum Correctional Centre, Apapa, Lagos State on whose behalf we write this letter.

Our clients were convicted in Thailand for drug related offences at various times between 1998 and 2006. They were however transferred from Thailand to the Kirikiri Maximum Correctional Centre to complete their prison terms following the Prison Exchange Treaty of 2012 between the Kingdom of Thailand and the Federal Government of Nigeria. Section 5 of the said Prison Exchange Treaty stipulates that the transferring State i.e. Thailand “shall retain exclusive jurisdiction regarding the judgments of its court, the sentences imposed by them and any procedures for revision, modification or cancellation of those judgments and sentences.”

Pursuant to the said Treaty our client were granted general amnesty under the Thai Royal Amnesty Decree in 2016 and 2019. But due to undisclosed reasons the authorities of the Nigerian Correctional Services have refused to release our clients from unlawful incarceration notwithstanding that they have been pardoned under the Thai Royal Amnesty Decree. However, having obtained copies of the Royal Amnesty documents from the Government of Thailand through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, we are pained to know our clients ought to have been released from prison custody at various times between 2010 and 2019.

It is evident that the Federal Government which facilitated the transfer of our clients from Thailand to Nigeria has abandoned them in the Kirikiri Maximum Correctional Centre. Thus, due to unpardonable negligence of certain public officers the Federal Government has been wasting public fund on maintaining our clients when they ought to have regained their freedom. We are therefore compelled to draw your attention to the facts and circumstances of the conviction, sentences and the royal pardon granted to our clients which are briefly set out below:

1. MR AZUKAEME HENRY EJIKEME was convicted and sentenced to 25 years imprisonment in 2006. He served 10 years and 5 months of the jail term in Thailand and has served additional 11 years in Nigeria. Pursuant to the Royal Decree of Amnesty to Detainees his sentence commuted he ought to have been released from prison custody on March 6, 2018.

2. MRS. OGBONNA Nee JIGBALE GLORIA LIEOMA (a.k.a CHOLA MULENGA) was convicted and sentenced to 33 years imprisonment in 2005. She served 10 years of the prison term in Thailand and additional 12 years in Nigeria. She was granted Royal pardon pursuant to the Royal Decree of Amnesty to Detainees on August 3, 2005 and her jail term commuted to one sixth of the original sentence. She ought to have been released from prison custody on February 19, 2019.

3. MR. OKPALA KINGSLEY CHIBUIKE (a.k.a OTENG SAMUEL) was convicted and sentenced to 25 years imprisonment in 2007 for drug related offences. He served 8 years and 5 months in Thailand and additional 11 years in Nigeria. He was granted Royal Pardon pursuant to the Thailand’s Royal Decree of Amnesty to Detainees and his sentence commuted to one- sixth of the original sentence. He ought to have been released from prison custody since April 4, 2017.

4. MR. YAKUBU YAHUZA MOHAMMED was convicted and sentenced to 25 years imprisonment in 2006. He served 10 years of the jail term in Thailand and an additional 11 years custodial term in Nigeria. He was granted royal pardon pursuant to Thailand’s Royal Decree of Amnesty to Detainees and his sentence commuted to one-sixth of the original sentence. He ought to have been released from prison custody on May 3, 2019.

5. MR. KENNEDY TANYA (a.k.a TANYA VICTOR KENNEDY) was convicted and sentenced to 25 years imprisonment in 2006. He was granted royal pardon pursuant to the Royal Decree of Amnesty to Detainees and his sentence commuted to one-sixth of the original sentence. He ought to have been released from prison custody on May 14, 2017.

6. MR JOHN SMITH was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment in Thailand in 1998. He served 10 years’ imprisonment in Thailand and an additional term of 13 years in Nigeria. By the Royal Amnesty granted him he ought to have been released from prison custody on July 29, 2010.

In view of the foregoing, we respectfully urge you to use your good offices to terminate the unlawful detention of our clients forthwith and authorize their immediate release from the Kirikiri Maximum Correctional Center, Lagos. Copies of the Amnesty documents and necessary annexures are hereby attached for your perusal and necessary action.

Whilst undertaking to provide further information which may be required in respect of this request, please accept as usual, the assurances of our highest esteem and professional regards.

Yours Sincerely,

MR FEMI FALANA, SAN, FCI Arb.

66 Soldiers File N1.3bn Suit Against FG For Violation Of Human Rights

0

Sixty-six convicted soldiers have filed a suit at a Federal High Court, Lagos challenging their continued detention in the custody of the Ikoyi and Kirikiri Maximum Correctional Centres, Lagos.

They are asking the court for an order directing the respondents, the Minister of Internal Affairs and Comptroller, Nigeria Correctional Services, Lagos to pay them a cumulative sum of N1.320 billion for violation of their fundamental rights to personal liberty and freedom from discrimination of their persons.

In the fundamental rights enforcement suit filed by their counsel, Mrs. Funmi Falana, the applicants are asking the court for a declaration that their continued detention at the correctional centres, despite the amnesty granted them by President Muhammadu Buhari since April 9, 2020 is illegal and unconstitutional and violates their rights to personal liberty guaranteed by section 35 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (As Amended) and Article 6 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act (CAP A10) Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.

They are therefore seeking a declaration that their continued detention at the custody the correctional centre, in Ikoyi and Apapa also violates their right to freedom from discrimination guaranteed by Section 42 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as Amended) and Articles 2 and 6 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act (CAP A10) Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.

Other reliefs sought by the applicants are for an order directing the respondents to release them from the custody of Ikoyi and Kirikiri Correctional Centres, forthwith in compliance with the Presidential Amnesty granted on April 9, 2020, by President Muhammadu Buhari of the Federal Republic of Nigeria pursuant to Prerogative of Mercy under Section 175 of the Constitution.

They also asked the court for an order directing the respondents to pay to the applicants a total sum of N20 million each being compensation for the violation of their Fundamental Rights to Personal Liberty and Freedom from Discrimination of their persons.

The applicants based their request for reliefs on nine grounds.

They contended that the refusal of the respondents to permit the immediate release the applicants based on the Presidential Amnesty granted recently by President Buhari pursuant to Prerogative of Mercy under Section 175 of the Constitution of Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as Amended) and the continued detention of the Applicants is illegal and unconstitutional as they violate the Applicants’ right to their Personal Liberty guaranteed by section 35 of the 1999 Constitution and Article 6 of the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights Act.

They also contended that the refusal of the respondents to release the applicants along with the 2,600 who met the terms of the Presidential Amnesty granted recently by the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria pursuant to Prerogative of Mercy under Section 175 of the Constitution of Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (As Amended) along is discriminatory, illegal and unconstitutional as it violates the Applicants’ right to Freedom from Discrimination and Article 2 of the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights Act.

They argued that the respondents ought to release the applicants from prison custody forthwith in accordance with the terms of the aforesaid Presidential amnesty.

They further argued that having been in custody for 67 months out of the prison term of 80 months, they have spent more than 75% of their 10-year imprisonment.

Alternatively, they said since they are due to be released next year, they have less than three years to complete their 10-year term of imprisonment.

They are therefore qualified for the Presidential amnesty having served a substantial term of their sentence.

They said one of the convicted soldiers; Cpl. Stephen Clement was released from prison custody on April 28, 2020 on the ground that he had spent more than 75 percent of his 10-year prison term in line with the terms of the Presidential Amnesty of April 9, 2020.

In the affidavit in support of their application, they averred that they were charged and tried alongside other eleven soldiers before a General Court-Martial on a six-count charge of committing mutiny, criminal conspiracy to commit mutiny, attempted murder, disobedience to particular orders, insubordinate behaviour and false accusation contrary to and punishable under the Armed Force Act (Cap A20) Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.

They said at the end of the trial, they were convicted and sentenced to death in a judgment delivered sometime in September 2014.

They averred that following a review of their case, the confirming authority upheld the conviction but commuted the death sentence to 10 years imprisonment. Since the Applicants are entitled to remission of the 10-year jail term, they are required to spend a total of 80 months in prison custody. From September 2014 to June 2020, they have spent over 67 months in custody.

They averred that in exercise of the powers of Prerogative of Mercy under Section 175 of the Constitution, President Buhari granted amnesty to certain categories of convicted inmates including those who have spent 75 percent of their sentence after remission as well as inmates who have less than three years term left to serve having served a substantial term of their service for offences that attract five years and above.

They claimed that having been in custody for 67 months out of the prison term of 80 months, they have spent more than 75 per cent of their 10-year imprisonment and that they have less than three years to complete their 10-year term of imprisonment as they are due to be released from custody next year.

They averred that the respondents have refused or failed to permit the immediate release of the applicants in accordance with the terms of the aforesaid presidential amnesty.

They claimed that the respondents have released one Cpl. Stephen Clement whose prison term was also commuted to 10 years imprisonment on the grounds that he met the terms of the presidential amnesty.

They further claimed that the respondents have released 2,600 convicts who met the conditions set out in the presidential amnesty but have refused to release the applicants from custody without adducing any reason.

COVID-19: African Free Trade Zone And The ECOWAS Trade And Commerce

By O. M. Atoyebi, SAN

The world has never been more ignited in recent times for survival than at the end of 2019 and the launch of 2020 through to the mid-year and still counting. For many, the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic projected a rather unannounced arrival of end-time. While the world is still adjusting to the disease and fighting to curb it, unfortunately, COVID-19 has triumphed in disrupting the entire chain of human affairs across the globe with its rippling effect.

The African Free Trade Zone and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) Trade and Commerce, being one of those economic engagements violently hit and halted by this crisis, along with the repercussions birthed by various emergency measures adopted by member countries and regions in curbing its overarching population sapping effects, would have otherwise been the take-off of a tremendous economic transposition for the African continent and indeed, the rest of the world.

The effect of the pandemic and with the gradual easing of imposed lockdowns in member countries (which until recently resulted in an indirect placing of unintended embargo on these kinetic commercial interactions, all in a bid to prevent the multiplicity of the contagion) spells for the growth of the African market, is the focal point of this work.

THE AFRICAN CONTINENTAL FREE TRADE AREA

The African Continental Free Trade Area (hereinafter referred to as “AfCFTA”) is a trade deal designed to drop barriers in intra-African trade[1]. According to Brookings Institution, intra-African exports made up only 19% of total trade in 2018, compared to 59% and 69% for intra-Asia and intra-Europe trade respectively[2], this sharp variance defines the rationale for the need to put such a long overdue deal in place. Simply put, the AfCFTA aims at rewriting this unproductive narrative by means of increasing in-house African trade through the removal of barriers.

The 55-nation continental Free-trade Zone which has been referred to as the world’s largest Free-trade Zone, is being expected to create $3.4Trillion combined gross domestic product of economic bloc with 1.3 Billion people across Africa and constitute the largest new trading bloc in the world, since the inception of the World Trade Organization in 1994[3]. Interestingly, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) remarked that the AfCFTA is a “potential economic game changer and eliminating tariffs (in Africa) could boost trade in Africa by 15-25% in the medium term”.

COVID-19 AND THE KICK-OFF OF THE LONG-AWAITED AFRICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT

The landmark African Free Trade Agreement is the instrument intended to initiate the laid out liberal trans-border commercial activities across the coastal regions of the continent once implemented on the 1st day of July, 2020, having been ratified by all member countries, with Nigeria following suit in July, 2019 (after series of delays and protracted consultations with relevant stakeholders). This decision of the largest economy in Africa to sign the agreement was a massive amplifier to the deal. The AfCFTA entered into force on 30th May, 2019[4].

A Free Trade Agreement simply means where a country has a lower cost of production in her home Nation, such Nation will gain market share by offering products cheaper than the competition[5]. Also, by the Agreement, Nations can no longer artificially increase prices of imported goods by imposing import duties[6]. Free Trade Agreements are designed to cut trade tariffs among member countries, help make a country’s exports cheaper and get easier access to other markets. It removes border taxes or trade barriers, get rid of quotas in such a way that there will be no limit to the amount of trades indigenous businessmen can conduct. These tariffs are usually in the form of taxes.[7]

Beyond dispute is the fact that though the Agreement is already legally in force, a number of details are still unsolved as part of the first phase of the process which would have brought the July zero hour for the take-off of trade in goods and services under the new tariff into fruition. This was as a result of the direct fallout of the African Union’s inability to hold its earlier scheduled Conference in Johannesburg, South Africa in May, 2020, to place the lid over the Agreement, owing to the cross-border travel restrictions and in-country imposition of lockdowns to arrest the rapid spread of the coronavirus pandemic[8]. As it stands, only a rescheduling of both the meeting and take-off dates by the Assembly as soon as practicable, would see to the successful unveiling of trading inter-relations in the zone as initially earmarked, especially with the gradual easing of the somewhat stiff control measures placed in concerned territories.

ECOWAS TRADE AND COMMERCE

Trade in the Community is evolutionary. There was a time when old trading links were still being relied on to sustain business exchanges in the area. What is being awakened now however is trade with development dimension. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), since its inception has had a trade policy designed to increase intra-regional commerce, raise trade volume and generally galvanize the economic activities within the region in such a way as to positively impact on the economic wellbeing of ECOWAS citizens[9].

The ECOWAS trade policy is also meant to foster the smooth integration of the region into the world economy with due regard for the political choices and development priorities of states in the desire to engender sustainable development and reduction of poverty[10].

The total trade of the region has averaged $208.1 Billion. Exports are projected at approximately $137.3 Billion while imports total about $80.4 Billion. The main active Countries in trade are Nigeria; which alone accounts for approximately 76 percent of total trade, followed by Ghana; (9.2 percent) and Cote d’Ivoire; (8.64 percent). The trade surplus of the region, estimated at about $47.3 Billion is attributable to Nigeria ($58.4 Billion) and Cote d’Ivoire ($3.4 Billion) when all other Countries have a deficit in the trade balance[11].

Today, the total ECOWAS trade has increased by an average of 18 percent per year between 2005 and 2020. It is dominated by Mining Commodities (oil resources, iron, bauxite, manganese, gold, etc..) and Agriculture (coffee, cocoa, cotton, rubber, fruits and vegetables and other products rather marketed within the region such as dry cereals, roots and tubers, livestock products) etc. Nigeria, Cote d’Ivoire, Ghana and Senegal concentrate 87 percent of this trade, with 79 percent of regional imports ($55,520 Million per year) and 94 percent of exports and re-exports ($77,792 Million per year)[12].

THE ECOWAS TRADE LIBERALIZATION PROGRAMME: CATALYST FOR ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION IN THE COMMUNITY

A main feature of the Community’s trading and commercial policy is ECOWAS Trade Liberalization Programme (ETLP). The objective of the programme is to progressively establish a Customs Union among the Member States of the Community over a period of fifteen years, starting from 1st January, 1990, the date of entry into force of the Scheme. The Customs Union will among others involve the total elimination of customs duties and taxes of equivalent effect.

The ECOWAS Trade Liberalization Programme, involves three groups of products; unprocessed goods, traditional handicraft products and industrial products. The programme is meant to give several advantages to member States and their citizens as they trade among themselves. An example of this is, the advantages accruing to unprocessed goods imported from a member state as contained in Decision C/DEC.8/11/79 of the Council of Ministers is, total exemption from import duties and taxes, free movement without any quantitative restriction as well as non-payment of compensation for loss of revenue as a result of their importation, provided that unprocessed products among other conditions, originate from member states of the Community and must appear on the list of products annexed to the decisions liberalizing trade in these products.

COVID-19 CLOG ON ECOWAS TRADE AND COMMERCE

The unpremeditated advent of COVID-19 and the measures placed to curb its dispersion across ECOWAS member states, with the commonest of such steps being the ban on cross-border movement, resulted in a huge dip in the progress of the ETLP in particular, and all forms of commercial interrelations in the region in general. This could otherwise be channeled along a more productive and economically transforming axis for the concerned States and in fact, even the rest of the Continent.

Continuous Trade in both goods and services would have played a key role in overcoming the pandemic and limiting its health and economic impact, especially on the poor through adopting coordinated measures on trade in response to the COVID-19 epidemic. Trading and Commerce would have contributed immensely by providing countries access to essential medical goods (including material inputs for their production) and services to help contain the pandemic and treat those affected; ensuring access to food, maintaining and enhancing nutritional intake of the poor which will boost immune systems and contribute to the ability to resist the virus; providing farmers with necessary inputs (seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, equipment, veterinary products) for the next harvest; and supporting jobs and maintaining economic activity in the face of a global recession, disruption to regional and global value chains, and reduced employment and increased poverty.

Conversely, measures to contain the pandemic in West-Africa and the whole of Africa is reducing trade. African countries are highly dependent on global trade, and measures put in place that limit trade are rapidly having negative impacts on most countries hitherto operating in the ETLP. Thirty-two countries in Africa have put in place flight restrictions[13]. Some have suspended all commercial passenger flights, others have blocked international flights, while a few have limited the restrictions to countries with high infection rates.

Experience from previous crises, such as the 2008-2011 food price crisis of 2009, clearly shows that imposing export restrictions on medical and food products will increase the international prices of these products which will impact most negatively on the poorest people. Export bans on food also lowers domestic prices which reduces the incentive to grow food crops in the next season. If the pandemic spreads in Africa the same way as in Europe and the USA, it will result in critical hotspots that could overwhelm local health capacities and food security, the two most vital survival necessities for everything alive.

URGENT NEED FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AfCFTA

The last World Economic Outlook from IMF forecasts a -3% contraction in world GDP in 2020 and a -1.6% contraction for sub-Saharan Africa for the same period[14]. The fall in the world GDP will no doubt lead to a severe fall in the exports demand for African products due to the fall in the global demand as COVID-19 persists. Given the specificities of African economies, the negative impact would be more than proportional, hence more trade among African nations and between Africa and the rest of the world is of essence. The AfCFTA will thus have the advantage of boosting intra-African trade contributing to mitigate the rapid decline in African GDP[15].

COVID-19 is both a supply and demand shock. Given this magnitude, the crisis may lead to a significant upending of global value chains, perhaps leading to a higher reliance on regional value chains. Given the potential for the AfCFTA to serve as a real economic engine at the continental level, policymakers must maintain the momentum towards its implementation so as to empower the region to more successfully navigate the hit its economies will take and have already taken. Trade liberalization under the AfCFTA is among many policies that could help pull countries out of recession after the pandemic is over.

CONCLUSION

Indubitably, the very soul of every nation is the income that accrues to it. From the provision of basic amenities (with food, shelter and even clothing being the constant variables), to the more political cum economically motivated projects, policies and programmes aimed at maintaining the stronghold of a nation among its other dominating contemporaries. African countries have managed to devise tactical progressive models designed to rescue the continent from sinking into the abyss of hunger, war and poverty, by evolving a medium via which trade and commercial activities will flourish among the inhabitants of the black-nation with little or no need of reliance on external channels.

The bid to introduce the AfCFTA and the push to advance the long existing ECOWAS Trade and Commerce (for the benefit of member-countries and by extension, the whole of Africa), have been the forces at the forefront of achieving this mandate. Unfortunately, just when plans were set to go on motion, the COVID-19 pandemic trotted its way from other parts of the Globe into the shores of the Continent and is threatening to cancel the anticipated success of these plans.

With the stiff measures to fight the pandemic now being tenderly relaxed coupled with the positive available windows it has helped to expose, the time is ripe for African leaders to intensify their strength to see to the quickened implementation and diversification of the masterplan for the economic development and transformation of our dear continent.

Paper by Oyetola Muyiwa Atoyebi, SAN.

Mr. Oyetola Muyiwa Atoyebi, SAN is one of the most notable professional Nigerian youth, who has distinguished himself in his professional sphere within the country and internationally. He is the youngest in the history of Nigeria to be elevated to the rank of a Senior Advocate of Nigeria. At age 34, he was conferred with the prestigious rank in September, 2019. Mr. O.M. Atoyebi, SAN can be characterized as a diligent, persistent, resourceful, reliable and humble individual who presents a charismatic and structured approach to solving problems and also an unwavering commitment to achieving client’s goals. His hard work and dedication to his client’s objectives sets him apart from his peers. 

As the Managing Partner of O.M. Atoyebi, SAN and Partners, also known as OMAPLEX Law Firm, he is the team leader of the Emerging Areas of Practice of the Firm and one of the leading Senior Advocates of Nigeria in Information Technology, Cyber Security, Fintech and Artificial Intelligence (AI). He has a track record of being diligent and he ensures that the same drive and zeal is put into all matters handled by the firm. He is also an avid golfer.

Email: [email protected]

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/atoyebi-oyetola-muyiwa-san-804226122/

[1] https://nairametrics.com/2019/07/30/acfta-a-potential-game-changer-for-africa/

[2] ibid

[3] https://www.theafricareport.com/27678/coronavirus-delay-of-afcfta/

[4] https://www.tralac.org/resources/6730-continental-free-trade-area-cfta.html

[5] https://nairametrics.com/2019/07/30/acfta-a-potential-game-changer-for-africa/

[6] ibid

[7] ibid

[8] https://nairametrics.com/2020/04/30/take-off-of-africa-free-trade-zone-suffers-set-back/

[9] https://www.ecowas.int/ecowas-sectors/trade/

[10] ibid

[11] ibid

[12] ibid

[13] https://africacdc.org/covid-19/covid-19-resources

[14] https://www.brookings.edu/blog/africa-in-focus/2020/05/22/the-afcfta-and-measures-to-facilitate-trade-could-significantly-mitigate-covid-19s-economic-impact-in-africa/

[15] ibid