Home Blog Page 858

CSOs call out National Assembly on failure to meet statutory 181 sitting days in a year

0

▪︎Say suspension of legislative, oversight functions is a matter of concern

A coalition of 39 Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) has expressed concern over suspension of legislative and oversight functions by the National Assembly, pointing out that both the Senate and House of Representatives have fallen short of their statutory minimum 181 sitting days in a legilsative year.

They issued the statement on Sunday in Abuja.

The statement reads: “We, the undersigned civil society organizations, are constrained to issue this statement over the drop off of legislative activities by the National Assembly at a time when its role is more critical than ever before, not only to join the Executive in finding solutions to the unprecedented challenges facing the country but indeed to also ensure that there is no Executive overreach as emergency powers are being invoked to implement a range of measures, ostensibly to check the spread of the Coronavirus in Nigeria.

“The legislative year is June 2019 to July 2020, two months vacation,
56 days public holiday,6-week Yuletide vocation, 42 days, 7-week coronavirus break, 49 days in addition to 62 days for Saturdays and Sunday. This means 216 days out of 365 days in a year. Therefore, the National Assembly sat for only 149 days instead of the 181 days prescribed by the constitution.

“Many had thought that owing to the intermittent closure of the parliament in the wake of the pandemic and given the critical issues requiring legislative attention, that the lawmakers could have devised means of extending its plenary sittings and meeting the constitutionally-mandated 181 sitting days in a legislative year given the disruptions of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Furthermore, prior to and during the ongoing vacation, the lawmakers were conducting very important investigative hearings into the mismanagement of public funds by various ministries, departments and agencies (MDAs) of the Federal Government as well as into the huge Chinese loans and their terms, among others.

“Citizens who were rattled by the revelations coming out of those hearings were waiting with keen interest for their logical conclusions and outcomes.

“Hence it was good to see these activities continue even into the vacation of the lawmakers.

“It was therefore shocking to wake up to the August 19th directive by the leadership of the House of Representatives suspending all legislative activities including those investigative hearings that had captivated the nation.

“The House leadership relied on established global practice of suspending legislative activities while the institution of the legislature is on break.

“However, given the importance of the hearings and the limited time available for the National Assembly to conduct reforms in nation’s electoral laws, review the Constitution, consider the 2021 Appropriation Bill, and attend to numerous other pending legislative assignments, there was no justification or reason given for the illogical step taken by the House of Representatives to suspend committee activities.

“We dare say that even if this decision was taken with good intentions, it is ill-advised, ill-timed and unhelpful as it fuels all forms of conspiracy theories and interpretation of collusion and attempt to cover up fraud, especially given that the National Assembly is already plagued by a lack of credibility or public trust.

“The National Assembly cannot afford another bad press given its already negative image and perception by citizens.

“We therefore urge the House leadership to treat these as matters of urgent national and public importance, rescind this decision and allow various committees to carry on with legislative and oversight activities, including concluding the suspended investigative hearings.

“We also call on the House to ensure that the reports and outcomes of these investigative hearings are made publicly available and that all those who are found to be culpable should be brought to justice.

“Finally, we call on all anti-corruption agencies to live up to their responsibilities by following up on these investigative hearings to gather actionable evidence to prosecute those who have violated various anti-corruptions laws and regulations.

“There is already an enormous amount of information in the public domain and it baffles the imagination that anti-corruption agencies are sitting helplessly and tight-lipped at a time like this when they should be busy filling criminal charges against those already indicted by the evidence that emanated from the legislative hearings.”

The CSOs that signed the statement are as follows:

1. Centre for Democracy and Development (CDD)
2. Centre for Democratic Research and Training (CRDDERT)
3. Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC)
4. Media Rights Agenda (MRA)
5. Centre for Information Technology and Development (CITAD)
6. Socio-Economic Right and Accountability Project (SERAP)
7. Zero-Corruption Coalition (ZCC)
8 Accountability Maternal New-born and Child Health in Nigeria (AMHiN)
9. Partners on Electoral Reform
10. Policy and Legal Advocacy Centre, PLAC
11. African Centre for Media and Information Literacy (AFRICMIL)
12. National Procurement Watch Platform
13. Say NO Campaign—Nigeria
14. Resource Centre for Human Rights and Civil Education (CHRICED)
15. Social Action
16. Community Action for Popular Participation
17. Borno Coalition for Democracy and Progress (BOCODEP)
18. Global Rights
19. Alliance for Credible Elections (ACE)
20. Youth Initiative for Advocacy, Growth & Advancement (YIAGA)
21. Tax Justice and Governance Platform
22. Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth, Nigeria
23. Women In Nigeria
24. African Centre for Leadership, Strategy & Development (Centre LSD)
25.Rule of Law and Accountability Advocacy Centre(RULAAC)
26.Women Advocate Research And Documentation Centre
27.Community Life Project
28.Nigerian Feminist Forum
29.Alliances for Africa
30. Spaces for Change
31.Nigerian Women Trust Fund
33.Corporate Accountability and Public Participation Africa
34. BudgiT Foundation
35. State of the Union (SOTU)
36.Order Paper
37.Femi Falana Chamber
38.HEDA Resource Centre
39.Conscience for Human Rights and Conflict Resolution

Dakuku Peterside: Ominous Predictions, Spurious Presumptions on Edo 2020 Election (1), By Victor Oshioke

After reading “Edo State and the Gathering Storm (1)” written by Dr. Dakuku Peterside and published in the Leadership Newspaper on August 24, 2020, I wondered if the immediate past Managing Director of NIMASA and APC chieftain in Rivers State was merely signing on to opinions expressed by interested third parties in the forthcoming Edo State governorship election or he indeed is one of the fifth columnists within the APC, who for extraneous reasons other than the good of Edo people, are bent on gifting to PDP, the South South State, won by APC in 2016 and with the level of preparedness, on course to be won convincingly again by the party at the polls in 2020.

The present volatile political climate in Edo State, was engendered well before the race for the 2020 governorship election started. It actually began on June 17, 2019 when on the orders of Governor Godwin Obaseki , his deputy Philip Shaibu spearheaded the kidnap of some members- elect of the state House of Assembly, and caused Nine of them out of the Twenty- four member assembly to be inaugurated almost at midnight.

The next day, June 18, 2019, thugs mobilised on the orders of Governor Godwin Obaseki, and accompanied by his Chief Security Officer, a policeman, attacked Seventeen members-elect who had gathered at the Golden Tulip hotel in Benin City, to give a press conference on the illegal midnight inauguration of nine of their colleagues. They were all molested in broad daylight and some of them were so beaten up that they ended up being hospitalised.
Since then, Edo State has technically become a lawless entity not governed according to the laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

Essentially, Godwin Obaseki has become a dictator and his deputy, Philip Shaibu the unapologetic, intractable chief executioner. Several efforts to mediate in the crisis rocking the state have been rebuffed by an obstinate governor Obaseki, who has consistently and openly boasted that the constitutional provision which grants him and his deputy immunity from prosecution while in office, means that they have the powers to do and undo, including the use of coercion and violence to impose themselves in office for a second tenure. This is the crux of the matter in Edo State. This and nothing else, is the reason, despite the intervention of concerned individuals across the country, including traditional rulers, the national assembly, the APC leadership etc, Godwin Obaseki has refused to heed the voice of reason. The situation was exacerbated when he failed the screening process of the APC and subsequently decamped to the PDP where he secured the party’s ticket as their flag bearer for the September 19, 2020 governorship race in the state.

Suffice to say that since joining PDP, he has practically extricated Edo State from the commonwealth of states answerable to the superior authority of the federal government of Nigeria, compromised institutions of government, manipulates the activities of the three tiers of government domiciled in the state, and emasculated the three arms of the state government to capitulate to his despotic imperial authority.

As of today, governor Godwin Obaseki has refused to recognise nineteen duly inaugurated members of Edo State House of Assembly, instead he runs the state with a five members renegade Assembly that sits in the premises of the Edo State Government House. Four out of eighteen elected Local government chairmen have been illegally removed from office and replaced with appointed chairmen because they refused to endorse Godwin Obaseki and his deputy Philip Shaibu for a second tenure in office. Eighty-four out of the One hundred and ninety-two elected Councillors in the state were removed from office in one sweep, because they refused to endorse him for a second tenure and replaced with unelected minions of the governor. All these atrocious trampling on the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria were effected with the use of merciless thugs, who are ready at any time and willing to maim or kill once the order is given.

In Edo state today, you cannot move around without watching your back, if you are not PDP or have not endorsed Godwin Obaseki for a second tenure. Going around the State, one would think that nobody is contesting against Godwin Obaseki and Philip Shaibu. Only their billboards and posters are everywhere, because just as they recruited young men to install their billboards and paste their posters, they also recruited thugs whose only assignment is to transverse the state, destroying the billboards of the APC candidates and burning their posters.

The level of thuggery, impunity and government sponsored gangsterism is unprecedented since the return to democracy in 1999, which has prompted no less a political personality as Chief Bola Ahmed Tinubu to denounce the government of Godwin Obaseki as reminiscent of the darkest days of military dictatorship in Nigeria.

There is virtually no campaign rally held by the APC candidate, especially in Edo North, that has not witnessed unprovoked attacks by thugs loyal to and acting on the orders of Philip Shaibu, the Edo state deputy governor. The incidents are so prevalent that many now go unreported because they are carried out by the same set of persons who have been reported severally to the security agencies, yet they are still going around perpetuating he same crimes without consequences.

Once these attacks are carried out, the deputy governor compels reporters of various media organisations attached to his office to submit for publication, reports written by his press secretary, suggesting that it is APC supporters that attacked PDP supporters, even when the reporters are aware of what actually transpired. A case in point here is the invasion of Apana Community by thugs in the presence of the governor, his deputy and other members of their entourage. The atrocities were also witnessed by security personnel of the various agencies who were part of the governor’s convoy.

An attempt by the Police Area Commander, of the Auchi Area Command, a woman, to record the riotous vandalisation of properties and indiscriminate shooting of persons believed to be sympathetic to APC by the PDP thugs, was prevented by the deputy governor, who forcefully took her personal mobile phone away from her. The people of Apana Community have since written a petition to the Edo State Commissioner of Police, the Assistant Inspector General of Police Zone 5 and the Director of the Department of State Security, Benin City. Yet, no arrests have been made till now, despite the fact that the identities of the perpetrators were included in the petitions. Does this in any way indicate the use of federal might as was suggested by Dr. Peterside in his article? The violence in Edo State is one sided, because it is being sponsored by the government of Edo State against opponents who have refused to support the second tenure bid of the governor and his deputy.

How well does Dr. Peterside know Edo State Deputy Governor Philip Shaibu and the latter’s propensity to violence for him to dismiss the allegations against him as childish? Is it not curious that barely two days after the plot was exposed, Philip Shaibu indeed presented on national television, images of a purported attack on the convoy of an unnamed PDP leader, which prompted Seun Akinbaloye, the dexterous, no-nonsense, anchor of Channels TV “Politics Today” to question such a coincidence?

It is unfortunate therefore, that while Peterside made cognitive reference to the incidents that happened at the Oba Palace in Benin, the invasion of Apana Community and the government sponsored vandalisation of the Edo State House of Assembly complex, he refrained from apportioning the blame appropriately where it belongs.

The reality is that there is neither balance of power nor is there a balance of terror is what is playing out in Edo state. The federal government has not in any way exercised its might despite the blatant abuse of powers by the Edo state governor and his deputy. So there is no justification whatsoever for the assertion that ” The federal might of the ruling APC valiantly tests itself against the local prowess of the PDP” On the contrary, it is the PDP that has demonstrated its assumed local prowess to test and challenge the might of the ruling APC, despite the non interference by federal authorities in the glaring excesses of Godwin Obaseki and Philip Shaibu.

Peterside is right to suggest that PDP counts on local thugs who are dangerous and do not put much premium to the sanctity of both their lives and the lives of anyone who stands in their way. But there is nothing to suggest that any form of cooperation and connivance exists between the APC and the law enforcement agencies. If there was such cooperation, the perpetrators of the invasion of Apana and many other heinous crimes, whose names have since been forwarded to the law enforcement agencies, would not be walking free and still terrorising innocent citizens.

To declare as childish, without evidence to suggest that he conducted any personal investigation or rely on the result of any investigations of the allegation that the Edo State Deputy Governor Philip Shaibu was hatching a plan to stage an attack on his own convoy and blame it on APC, Peterside betrayed where his loyalty really lies and that is quite unfortunate. What is childish by all standards, is the continuous efforts by Philip Shaibu to prevent Comrade Adams Oshiomhole from accompanying Pastor Osagie Ize-Iyamu on the campaign trail, through unfounded, baseless accusations that Oshiomhole is arming thugs to perpetuate violence.

The truth is that the energised crowds of APC supporters that throng every campaign rally where Comrade Oshiomhole makes appearance for Pastor Osagie Ize-Iyamu has become an embarrassment to Godwin Obaseki and his tactless South South conspirators within the APC, who had sold a false narrative to party leaders in Abuja that Oshiomhole’s influence was waning in Edo State. This is the reason why Philip Shaibu is merchandising falsehoods against Comrade Adams Oshiomhole, with the hope that somehow, by hook or crook, they may be able to get Comrade off the campaign trail.

The conspiracy goes far beyond Edo State, to include those who have suggested that Comrade Adams Oshiomhole is campaigning as if he is on the ballot. What they fail to acknowledge, is the fact that it was Godwin Obaseki and his team that tried to make this election about Adams Oshiomhole, by floating the godfatherism narrative. What they did not bargain for was the depth of love Edo people have for Comrade Adams Oshiomhole.

The strategy backfired and with their overwhelming support for Pastor Osagie Ize-Iyamu’s candidacy, Edo people have signified that they either did not buy into the whole godfatherism narrative or if they did, they would rather have Comrade Adams Oshiomhole, an Edo man, who they know governed them well for 8 years and who they trust, than have Nyesom Wike lord over them as godfather to replicate in our state, the vicious reign of terror he introduced in Rivers State.

Hopefully Edo will not be Rivers and the predictions of Edo State being “littered with tears and blood in the wee hours of September 19, 2020” are a revelation of some sinister plans which Dakuku Peterside may be privy to and which he should divulge to security agencies.

If Peterside’s concerns were altruistic and his wish is for the will of Edo people to prevail, he should be more forthcoming about the outside influences that seek to manipulate the election process in Edo State. It is counterproductive, perhaps mischievous, to scare Edo voters with doomsday predictions without concrete information to help them prepare ahead. Peterside could do more, as a witness to the several incidents of blood letting on the streets of Rivers State towns and villages, to warn Edo people on how to avoid his ominous predictions, especially when the onslaught on Edo people is very likely to be led by Nyesom Wike, once his ally and now a foe, whom he has fought beside and against on several occasions.

Also worrisome is the fact that Peterside was so gracious towards Nyesom Wike in his analysis of the Edo election. Could there be some form of cooperation between the warlords of Rivers State to bring Edo State under their control? Or has desperation forced Obaseki to sign a multiparty MOU with the contending political forces in Rivers State?

This is not unimaginable because there is a real and imminent threat of the importation of militants from the Niger Delta region to mar the Edo state elections, and where else if not from Rivers State could such dangerous elements be sourced.

If indeed Peterside wished to offer an unbiased commentatary on the Edo State 2020 campaigns, he would have at least acknowledged the fact that the APC candidate Pastor Osagie Ize-Iyamu has been consistent in marketing “The Simple Agenda” manifesto to the Edo electorate. There is no single evidence of a campaign stop, where Pastor Osagie Ize-Iyamu has engaged in negative campaigns.

The limit of his denunciation has never gone beyond a constructive critique of Godwin Obaseki’s poor performance in office as governor. He has displayed an uncommon maturity, perhaps because of his Pentecostal disposition, by restraining himself from venturing into the personal, private foibles of his opponent, Godwin Obaseki, which unquestionably are legion.

On the contrary, the PDP campaign strategy is replete with negativity. This has even prompted an online commentator to jokingly, but accurately posit that PDP MEGA campaign rallies is nothing other than 25 minutes insults on Comrade Adams Oshiomhole, 25 minutes on what Oshiomhole said about Ize-Iyamu, 20 minutes insults on Pastor Osagie Ize-Iyamu, 15 minutes of dancing and the rally is over. The governor has boasted severally on camera that he will deal with anyone who does not agree with his style of governance.

He told his supporters on camera to return violence for violence. On national television, he boasted that he alone and his deputy have immunity and therefore they have the capacity and will to deal with anyone no matter how highly placed. Do we really need further evidence to know who is offering backing to the thugs responsible for the spate of violence in the state?

Comrade Adams Oshiomhole is a veteran in campaigns and electioneering. There is no record of violence in any elections he has ever been involved in. As a unionist and politician, he has won several high profile elections without violence. He campaigned for and delivered victory for Godwin Obaseki in 2016 without violence.

He campaigned for and delivered victory without violence for President Buhari’s reelection in 2019. Why would anyone imagine that he could resort to violence for the first time ever, in an election where he is not on the ballot and where his preferred candidate has worked very hard and well positioned to win at the polls?.

These are the issues that should influence any honest assessment of the events playing out in Edo state, not some arrant falsehoods maliciously coated in academic postulations and cunningly introduced into the public domain, capitalising on some previously acquired credibility.

In the final analysis, the 2020 governorship election in Edo State is an epic battle between APC and PDP, not a contest of personalities. It therefore behoves on those who advocate a lesser role for persons on the campaign trail, to be proactive themselves and stand up to speak for the party which they belong, the party on whose platform they acquired the audacity to be heard. Anything short of this is a confirmation of their roles as fifth columnists working from within, to weaken the APC ahead of the 2023 presidential election.

▪︎Victor Oshioke writes from Benin City.

OMSL directors refute alleged misappropriation of $18 million by Chairman

0

Directors of Ocean Marine Solution Limited (OMSL) have debunked a report about crisis in the management guard of the company over alleged misappropriation of $18 million by the Chairman of the company, Captain Hosa Okunbo.

Four directors, in a statement that they jointly signed, said the report was totally false in every material particular.

The directors who endorsed the statement with the exception of the Chair, Captain Hosa Okunbo, are Admiral Ameen Ikioda (retd.), Mr Garth Dooley, Admiral Joe Aikhomu (retd), and Mr Kunle Oyelakun.

The statement reads: “Our attention has been drawn to a malicious and spurious publication by a one-man blog (nurajos.blogspot.com) on alleged schism in the board of OMSL over alleged mismanagement of $18m (Eighteen million dollars).

“In the said write-up, the faceless hack mischievously alleged that our chairman, Capt. Idahosa Wells Okunbo, had taken possession of the said sum from NNPC, and squandered it in alleged bribery of National Assembly members and presidency officials over the squabble with Nigeria Ports Authority on the SAA issue.

“Ordinarily, we would not have dignified the faceless writer with a reply, but in the interest of unsuspecting members of the public who may be swayed by deliberate falsehood and for record purposes, we are constrained to put out this press statement.

“1. The write-up is totally false in every material particular.

“2. No payment of $18m dollars or any such payment was received by OMSL or our Chairman, Capt Hosa Okunbo.

“3. No bribe was paid to National lawmakers or presidency officials in respect of SAA issue with NPA by OMSL or our chairman.

“4. The concocted story could only have been in the warped imagination of the writer and his sponsor(s).

“5. We believe the write-up is politically motivated to smear the reputation of our company and our chairman.

“6. There is no division whatsoever in the directorate and management of OMSL.”

Theconclaveng

“CAMA, Mailafia, Governing Authorities and Perception Management”, By Martins Oloja

Inside Stuff With MARTINS OLOJA
‘The Guardian’, August 30, 2020, Back Page

This is yet another time to advise the authorities in Abuja and other state capitals on the expediency of taking perception management as a serious national security issue – before it is too late. I have written on this matter several times here but then we will continue to pray about this until something happens. I believe it is a weightier matter of public policy that Abuja should not ignore at the moment.

We do not need to speak in tongues about the fact that there is growing but unmanaged perception that Christians are being officially persecuted in Nigeria. This is dangerous and should be dealt with immediately. We have a social responsibility as gatekeepers to ensure that the country remains peaceful and securely so because we can only talk of economy, federalism and even elections when we are peaceful. We are aware that we need to get people to believe in Nigeria, a multi-religious state, as an indivisible entity according to our constitution.

But suddenly, for some curious reasons, the country is being seen as divided between Christians and Muslims. And so it is unfortunate today that when even public service appointments are announced, data analysts begin to count how many Christians and Muslims are there. Most times, we run away with the old western media fallacy that the fight for the soul of Nigeria is between the Muslim-dominated North and Christian-dominated South.

The annulled June 1993 presidential election outcome had threatened to wipe out this perception with a Muslim-Muslim ticket that no Christian protested at the time. But the annulment of the result by the military government then has since destroyed the foundation of coherence, tolerance and basis for unity in the country.

Most people believe that the beauty of Abiola-Kingibe 1993 presidential ticket would never happen again, no thanks to mismanagement of politics in Africa’s richest and most populous nation. That is why the way perception is fast growing again that Christians are generally not safe in the country is unfortunate and it must be dealt with now. This is not a time to be pinpointing who is who in government. This is not a time to be listing who occupies where in the ministries, departments and agencies of government. It is just a time to advise the duty bearers in the country to get experts in risk analysis who can speak to the power of negative perception and the need to recognise understanding of its danger at this time. Here is the thing, a government may be working on a particular public policy in public interest but the people may see the policy as evil unless it demonstrates and explains to them clearly that it is in public interest. Where good opinion polls are conducted, results of public perception will show how the people view certain policies.

That is why the federal authorities should get experts to do ‘risk analysis’ and ‘perception index’ on the way various publics have been affected by three current events as amplified by the media, which didn’t create them.

The issues: Dr Obadiah Mailafia, former deputy governor of Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), a Christian from Southern Kaduna (now in the eye of the storm) spoke to an FM station on an issue State Security operatives considered hateful shortly after a retouched National Broadcasting Code was released. The DSS had twice interrogated him on the alleged hate speech. The FM station has been fined N5 million for the Mailafia interview. The latest was that the police authorities too had invited Mailafia for the same ‘offence’ and he had to rush to court to enforce his right as a citizen. The immediate consequence of the incessant interrogations of this Oxford-trained technocrat is that he just resigned from the National Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies (NIPSS), Kuru, Plateau State where he has been a resource person to the policy research centre. In the absence of open information to others in this complex federation of complicated diversity, some perception is growing that Dr. Mailafia is facing this alleged harassment because he is a Christian from Southern Kaduna whose people are perceived too to be facing ‘state terror’. Who’s analysing this risk to the authorities in Abuja and Kaduna? Do the authorities know too that where rebellion is being cooked in the minds, there is another subset that nurtures the perception that most of the intelligence and security units interrogating the Mailafias are headed by Muslims? That is another element in the complex perception mix. That too should not be ignored.

‘The CAMA Uproar’:
It is also relevant to alert the authorities that the brouhaha about the implications of the new Company and Allied Matters Act (CAMA) has been largely worsened by Christian bodies’ perception that they are being targeted for persecution. It may not yet be reality but I hope the authorities have realised that as Pastor Femi Ayoyebi, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) and a senior pastor of RCCG has noted, most of the angry commentators on the voluminous CAMA might not have read all the provisions. But that is what perception management should target. This CAMA controversy cropped up like a sore thumb at a time another controversy about the National Population Commission (NPC) was brewing so dastardly.

There was a credible report early last week that Ali Silas Agara, a Christian nominated to take over as Chairman of National Population Commission, (NPC) had been replaced with a Muslim, Hon Kwarra Nasiru Isa.

President Muhammadu Buhari had in two separate letters dated March 20 and August 12, 2020, nominated Agara, a former deputy governor of Nasarawa State to head the NPC.
The letter by the President also contained names of individuals, who would serve as members of the Commission for five years as stipulated by an extant law. Others recommended alongside Agara are Muhammed Chuso A. Dottijo, member from Sokoto; Alhaji Razaq Gidado, member from Kwara; Ibrahim Mohammed, member from Bauchi; Joseph Kwai Shazin, member from FCT; Engineer Bala Almu Banya, member from Katsina; and Mrs Bimbola Salu-Hundeyin, member from Lagos.
“The positions to which appointments are to be made include the office of the Chairman from Nassarawa State, four new commissioners representing Sokoto, Kwara, Bauchi and the FCT, as well as the renewal of the appointment of others,” one of the letters by the President reads.
But according to another letter dated August 21, Isa also from Nasarawa State, was named as NPC Chairman while Agara was reportedly downgraded to a member of the Commission.
An online newspaper had earlier scooped how some officials within the Nigerian Government were not comfortable with Agara’s nomination being a Christian.
A source had confirmed to the digital newspaper that Abdullahi Sule, the Governor of Nasarawa state, a Muslim was among top Northern Muslims, who worked against a Christian being appointed to head the Commission. The governor has since denied his involvement but the report heightens the growing contention between perception and reality, in this regard. As I was saying, this is not a time to be using data about who’s is where as that can put another pin in the balloon of this complex and fragile nation.
The specific objective here is to advise the authorities not to allow their actions to promote what we call the fault lines – religion and ethnicity in Nigeria, our Nigeria.

But for poor public relations management strategy here, the CAMA provisions wouldn’t have been so secret. The amendment bill was in the National Assembly and it went through all the stages. Dr. Chidi Odinkalu, a vigilant lawyer, drew attention to it earlier. The federal legislature is made up of representatives from 360 federal constituencies and 109 senatorial districts across our 774 local government councils. Members are Muslims and Christians. What I would like to ask is why our representatives did not envisage the kind of reactions we are getting now from the Christian community. Reading through the entire CAMA provisions including Sections 823-835, which provide for the registration of voluntary organisations such as religious, educational, customary, social, cultural, sporting, charitable, and so on, by their trustees, I think what we need at this moment is management of perception.

Besides, our representatives, our local Nigerian Bar Associations, local Legal Aid Council offices, law enforcement agencies, NGOs, our dormant local and national orientation agencies and judicial desks of the news media should be involved in civic education on the meaning and consequences of accepting to be Trustees of some of the associations, or non-profits we incorporate and even faith-based ones. There is a general misconception about regulation here. There is also a great deal of misunderstanding about the role, function, responsibility of Trustees we always bandy. Pastor Atoyebi was quite sincere and resourceful about this when he touched on the implications, in this regard.
In this country, you will have a big hit if you take people in authorities to the cleaners whenever they talk about regulation and responsibilities of ‘Trustees of Organisations’.

‘Understanding ‘Governing Authorities’:

Le’s restate here that the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) and lawyers in the management of our faith-based organisations, especially churches and mosques need to know that we cannot continue to understand the rule of law only in the context of how our leaders and public officials only obey the laws. So, lawyers in our families, in our organisations should begin to educate all of us about the implications of accepting nominations to be ‘Trustees’ of any Foundation, Societies, Organisations, etc. We need civic education on “Corporate Governance and Legal Aspect of Organisation or Ministry” we run at this moment within this CAMA context.

We need to know key corporate governance issues on registration of ministry/organization and board of trustees. For faith-based organisations, we need to know that the law that guides an NGO is the same that guides the church or mosque. The same law that registers a church, for instance is the same that registers an organisation that can also become a terrorist organization regardless of who is in power. We need to understand that once you register your coming together, there are rules you must abide by. Once you register your church, or mosque or organization or Foundation or society, you make yourself susceptible to the rule of law.

So, being a trustee is not a title, it is a sensitive and even dangerous responsibility. You will be made to hold in trust ‘assets and liabilities’ of that company or organization or church or mosque. There are grave implications embedded in CAMA as in most societies. So, even as we criticise the new provisions in CAMA, we need to seek legal education on our rights and fiduciary responsibilities as Trustees of not-for-profit organisations. Ignorance of this, in the end, will not be an excuse. We should begin to teach our people basic things about corporate governance. It doesn’t matter whether you are a small or mega organisation. Let’s begin to understand the simple side of how the law should rule us and our organisations, too.

theconclaveng

ONE-PERSON COMPANY IN THE NEW CAMA: A BOW TO AN EXISTING PRACTICE

by Stephen Azubuike

By the provisions of section 18(2) of the Company and Allied Matters Act 2020 (“CAMA 2020” or “the New CAMA”), the Nigerian Legislature merely bowed to the already existing practice of one-person company ownership in the country by giving it a statutory approval.

Concept of Company in History

Historically, the idea of company incorporation is a product of statutory invention. Before that invention, individuals carried on their businesses in the usual manner. They did not only own properties in their personal capacities, they were also held personally liable for any contractual obligation and other legal obligations.

As commerce grew, people learnt to come together in groups to promote and own businesses and to also venture into the deep for opportunities. They pool resources together and map out what their stakes in the business would be. This idea and the growing need to absolve themselves from personal legal liabilities gave rise to what is known today as a company. The resources pooled together and the individual stakes translated into shares. The promoters themselves became shareholders and directors of the company.

In order to properly address the development, parliament decided in its wisdom to create an artificial being in the form of a company. Thus, upon incorporating a company, the company becomes an artificial person recognized by law, and attains what is known as ‘legal personality’. It can own properties in its name, other than in the names of the individual promoters and shareholders. It can sue and be sued in its name. It can practically live forever (perpetual succession) if it pleases (since ownership can change over time) and subject to the power of the promoters and the State to take away its life by liquidation and winding up procedures as we know it today. The company can be a member of other companies in its name and hold shares. To a large extent, the company enjoys virtually everything a person can possibly enjoy in relation to corporate and business matters.

Emergence of Bubble Companies

After the creation of this legal being in form of a company, parliament later came to witness a highly unanticipated development. There was an increase in the level of fraudulent activities perpetrated by individuals in the name of companies. Individual merchants started registering bubble companies, hiding under the veil of incorporation to defraud and harm unsuspecting citizens economically. The courts and the parliament responded by making provisions for the lifting of the veil of incorporation to hold those hiding behind the veil personally responsible for the conducts and acts attributed to the company.

It was in keeping with the idea of preventing bubble companies from rising and also to focus on the original process of at least two people coming together to form a business that company law mandated that a company can only be formed by two or more people. In other words, if an individual is comfortable doing business alone and owning all the stakes/shares, he can proceed in his individual capacity without the need for incorporation.

But this idea was rendered cosmetic when it became possible for one person to own a business and merely invite another person just to meet the statutory requirement of two. He or she takes 99.9% of the shares and gives the other “figure head” 0.1%. The Figure Head has no idea about the business and contributes nothing to the running of it. In some cases, the individual who ordinarily owns the business is left inviting some other person who might even be unsuitable just to comply with the compulsory requirement of two. Interestingly, it is worthy of note that some of these one-man (or one-woman) companies have been thriving for years.

The Reality: One-person Company

Therefore, becoming aware of the realities, the Nigerian Legislature moved to face it by making it statutorily possible for one person to incorporate and own private companies in Nigeria through the introduction made to the New CAMA. While section 18(1) retained the requirement of two or more persons, section 18(2) expressly provides that one person can form a private company. Private limited liability companies are small companies having a membership of not above 50. Private companies however have limitations as it is not every business in every sector that can be carried on by a private company, let alone private company formed and owned by one person. For a one-person company specifically, getting a banking and insurance license for example, may be mission impossible in Nigeria.

The natural consequences of the development in the New CAMA is that many people who had earlier been unable to navigate the former statutory requirement of two or more people coming together to register a company will now step forward and incorporate since the “burden” has been lifted.

Conclusion

The move by the Nigerian Legislature and the support of the President with his assent is undoubtedly part of the idea of promoting ease of doing business in Nigeria. With this ease also comes the ease of creating more bubble companies. Perhaps, in recognizing this, section 18(3) provides that no company should be formed for any unlawful purpose. It is however expected that stricter measures will be deployed in bursting bubbles with the sledge hammer of the law. Those who have the authority to handle the hammer must be firm and proactive. Members of the general public are advised to conduct due diligence and seek adequate legal protection in dealing with companies, especially now.

With this legal development, any person looking to incorporate a private company can do so without any hindrance and at Infusion Lawyers, we are ready to provide needed guidance throughout the process.

Credits: This post was originally published on Stephenlegal.ng by Stephen Azubike, legal practitioner, consultant and social entrepreneur.

EXCLUSIVE: Nigerian Senate To Pass Social Media Bill Despite Rejection By Nigerians

The Protection from Internet Falsehood and Manipulation and Other Related Matters Bill 2019 popularly known as the social media bill, is one of the bills before the Nigerian Senate led by Ahmed Lawan.

SaharaReporters gathered that the Nigerian Senate has concluded a “signed, sealed and delivered” plot to pass the social media bill once the it resumes plenary on September 15. 

According to a top source in the Senate, who pleaded anonymity, the upper legislative arm is determined to pass the heinous bill despite the immense rejection by majority of Nigerians. 

“They have already concluded plans to pass the bill. They are going to hide behind the COVID-19 issue and other national issues and pass the bill without delay. Their plan is to do it once they resume. It is already signed,” the source told SaharaReporters.

Recall that SaharaReporters reported that the social media bill was rejected by majority of Nigerians during the public hearing of the bill in March. 

It will also be recalled that the bill had been rumored to be an “executive bill”, thus making its passage non-negotiable by the lawmakers, who have shown that they were willing to support anything from the presidency.

When asked whether the Senate’s plan had always been to pass the bill without considering public opinion, the source told SaharaReporters, “I am not sure about that, but they believe that Nigerians will accept it and move on the same way they have accepted the Broadcasting Code.”

The reviewed Broadcasting Code was recently passed into law for media organizations in Nigeria. 

The reviewed code increased the fine for hate speech from N500,000 to N1m among other things and has already been used in sanctioning Nigeria Info, a radio station, following a recent interview in which a guest criticized the government on one of its popular programmes. 

According to its objectives, the social media bill will enable the Nigeria Police Force to “detect, control and safeguard against coordinated inauthentic behaviour and other misuses of online accounts”.

The bill proposes up to N5m or three years imprisonment or both for defaulters.

All attempts to reach Senator Muhammed Sani Musa; sponsor of the social media bill, and Senator Opeyemi Bamidele; Chairman, Senate Committee on Judiciary, Human Rights and Legal Matters, on the issue proved abortive as both were unreachable on their official telephone lines.

saharareporters

Refineries idle for 12 months, incur N142bn expenses

’Femi Asu

 The nation’s refineries did not refine a barrel of crude oil in the 12 months to June this year but incurred a combined operating expense of N142.07bn, the latest data from the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation have shown.

The NNPC attributed the declining operational performance of the refineries to ongoing revamp aimed at further enhancing their capacity utilisation once completed.

The refineries, which are located in Port Harcourt, Kaduna and Warri, have a combined installed capacity of 445,000 barrels per day but have continued to operate far below the installed capacity.

The country relies largely on importation of refined petroleum products as its refineries have remained in a state of disrepair for many years despite several reported repairs.

“No white product (Premium Motor Spirit and Dual Purpose Kerosene) was produced in June 2020 and apparently for the past 12 consecutive months. The lack of production is due to ongoing rehabilitation works at the refineries,” the NNPC said in its monthly report for June.

The corporation said the combined value of output by the refineries (at import parity price) for the month of June amounted to about N40m.

“No associated crude plus freight cost for the three refineries since there was no production but operational expenses amounted to N10.27bn. This resulted in an operating deficit of N10.23bn by the refineries,” it added.

The Kaduna refinery incurred an operating expense of N60.20bn from July 2019 to June 2020, according to the NNPC data.

Port Harcourt refinery’s operating expense in the period under review was N43.37bn while that of Port Harcourt refinery was N38.49bn.

The Chairman, SPE Nigeria Council, Joseph Nwakwue, said the refineries should have been sold some years ago to private investors.

He said, “Our position is that the refineries are key national assets and it is in our interest that they are optimally run from a commercial perspective. And we think that the private sector will do a better job of running it.

“I think it is important that we recognise that it serves no purpose that we have refineries that are sitting idle. They don’t just sit idle; we spend money to keep them idle. That is a huge drain. So, it is not in our national interest to continue to pump money into things that are not adding value.

“From that perspective, it is only reasonable that one would say we should have sold these things a long time ago to those who can run them.

“Maybe if we did, we won’t be importing the quantity of fuel we are importing today. So, I think that we should have sold them 10 years ago.”

The Group Managing Director, NNPC, Mallam Mele Kyari, said on July 30 that the refineries were all idle, adding that the country was importing practically every petroleum product being consumed in the country.

In June, 767.42 million litres of PMS were supplied into the country through the Direct Sale Direct Purchase arrangement as against the 495.10 million litres of PMS supplied in May.

Under the DSDP scheme, selected overseas refiners, trading companies and indigenous companies are allocated crude supplies in exchange for the delivery of an equal value of petrol and other refined products to the NNPC.

In the first term of the President, Major General Muhammadu Buhari (retd), the NNPC had planned to rehabilitate the refineries to attain a minimum of 90 per cent capacity utilisation.

The plan was to use third-party financiers and the original refinery builders to provide the requisite funding and technical support.

However, after over one and a half years, negotiations with financiers were stalled in December 2018 due to varying positions on key commercial terms.

Kyari, who took over the NNPC leadership in July 2019, had reiterated his plan to revamp the refineries and end fuel importation by 2023.

punchng.

Chadwick Boseman died from colon cancer and was just 43. What’s the risk for young people?

Actor Chadwick Boseman, 43, died Friday from colon cancer – a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the U.S. and one that is increasingly affecting young Americans.

While deaths from colon and rectal cancers have been declining for several decades due to improved screening and treatment measures, deaths among young people have been increasing slightly in recent years, according to researchers.

https://www.usatoday.com/videos/entertainment/2020/08/29/chadwick-boseman-black-panther-star-dies-43/5664889002/

“We are seeing more people in their 30s and 40s who are developing colorectal cancers – often because they’re having symptoms that aren’t thought to be cancers,” said Dr. Nilofer Azad, an associate professor of oncology at Johns Hopkins Medicine.

About 30% of colorectal cancer diagnosed today is in people under the age of 55, she said. Symptoms of colorectal cancer include a change in bowel movements, rectal bleeding, blood in stool, abdominal pain and more.

Actor Chadwick Boseman poses for a portrait in New York to promote his film, "Black Panther," on Feb. 14, 2018.

Boseman, who made a global impact bringing “Black Panther” to life in the Marvel Cinematic Universe along with playing Black icons on the silver screen, was diagnosed with stage III colon cancer in 2016 and battled with it as it progressed to stage IV, his family said in a statement Friday.

Colorectal cancer – which includes colon and rectal cancer – is expected to cause more than 50,000 deaths in 2020 – including 3,640 deaths in people younger than 50 years.https://db5f80b171e5298a14a361d354323257.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-37/html/container.html

The lifetime risk of developing colorectal cancer is about 1 in 23 for men and 1 in 25 for women, the American Cancer Society says. This year, more than 100,000 people will be diagnosed with colon cancer and more than 40,000 with rectal cancer, including 18,000 colorectal cancer cases in people younger than 50, the group estimates.

On Chadwick Boseman:His death gives me the courage to keep going

More young people are being affected

For younger people, those numbers are rising. Deaths from colorectal cancer among people younger than age 55 have increased 1% per year from 2008 and 2017, according to the American Cancer Society.

In 2017, about 130 people in their 20s died from colorectal cancer, 720 in their 30s and 2,700 in their 40s, with older age groups accounting for higher and higher death tolls, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Get the Coronavirus Watch newsletter in your inbox.

Stay safe and informed with updates on the spread of the coronavirusDelivery: VariesYour Email

During the late 1970s and early 1980s, colon cancer diagnoses were declining in age groups younger than age 50 years and increasing in those age 50 years and older, according to a 2017 study in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

But that trend flipped in the mid-1980s, when rates declined in adults age 55 years and older, while increasing by 2.4% per year in adults age 20-29 years and by 1% per year in adults age 30-39 years, the study found.

Rectal cancer rates saw an even more extreme version of this trend.

“If you were born in 1990 or afterward, you were two times more likely to get colon cancer or four times more likely to get rectal cancer than those born before 1990,” said Michael Sapienza, CEO of the Colorectal Cancer Alliance. “It is, unfortunately, becoming a bigger and bigger epidemic.”

Sapienza, whose mother died of colon cancer at age 56, said oncologists are seeing more late-stage diagnoses of colorectal cancers, which are often mistaken for other illnesses.

“What’s happening is, young people are going into the doctor having symptoms, and it’s usually taking them to see three or four doctors until they’re getting a diagnosis,” he said. “Especially now, in the telemedicine world, people are going to be afraid to recommend a colonoscopy. If you’re having rectal bleeding, night sweats, cramping – especially dark blood – you really to emphasize that with your physician.”

Chadwick Boseman’s best quotes:On ‘Black Panther,’ James Brown and more

Baltimore Orioles outfielder Trey Mancini was diagnosed in March, days before his 28th birthday. He was at spring training when a pair of blood tests revealed low iron levels. What he initially thought may have been a stomach ulcer or celiac disease turned out to be stage III colon cancer. Manci had a malignant tumor removed a week later and began chemotherapy in April.

“If you’re young like me, you don’t think you’re getting colon cancer,” Manci told USA TODAY. His father was diagnosed with stage II cancer at 58. “I was shocked.”

Baltimore Orioles' Trey Mancini runs the bases after hitting a solo home run on Aug. 1, 2019.

Oncologists don’t yet know what’s causing the rising number of cases among young people, but there are several theories.

“We really can’t hone in on one cause,” Azad said. “There could be diet changes, obesity, increasing prevalence of diabetes. All of these things are also associated with colorectal cancer.”

High consumption of processed meat and alcohol, low levels of physical activity and fiber consumption, and cigarette smoking are also known risk factors, researchers said.

“It is not surprising that the timing of the obesity epidemic parallels the rise in colorectal cancer because many behaviors thought to drive weight gain, such as unhealthy dietary patterns and sedentary lifestyles, independently increase colorectal cancer risk,” researchers said in the 2017 study.

Black Americans disproportionately affected

Overall, colorectal cancer disproportionately affects Black Americans. The cancer incidence is about 20% higher in Black men and women compared to their Caucasian counterparts, and Black patients are about 40% more likely to die of colorectal cancer, said Rebecca Siegel, a cancer epidemiologist and scientific director of surveillance research at the American Cancer Society.

“The mortality difference is what’s striking,” Siegel said. “It’s also the elephant in the room of systemic racism that has been going on for decades and affects everyone in the Black community, regardless of their wealth status.”

Among young people, the difference in the rate of cases between Black and white Americans narrows, Siegel said. White Americans under 50 account for a large portion of the increase in cases in the younger age group, she said.

Colon cancer:Baltimore Orioles’ Trey Mancini will likely miss 2020 season due to chemotherapy treatment

When should people get a colonoscopy? 

To combat the rising prevalence of colorectal cancer among young people, researchers suggest educating clinicians and the public about symptoms and screenings, and expanding health care access to young people, who are less likely to have access to a primary care physician and more likely to declare bankruptcy from their cancer treatments, Siegel said.

Researchers also suggest developing new strategies to curb the obesity epidemic and shift Americans toward healthier eating and more active lifestyles.

It’s also important to end the stigma around colorectal cancer, experts say.

“A very common symptom is bleeding in the stool, and that’s embarrassing. Young people are not accustomed to talking about these symptoms with their friends,” Siegel said.

Reducing the stigma and increasing awareness both of the symptoms and the increasing risk in young people directly translates to saving lives, she said.

“It might be tough for some people to talk about their colon and bowel movements, but it’s the third most common cancer and we need to talk about it more,” Manci said.

In 2018, the American Cancer Society updated its guidelines to recommend that people at average risk for colorectal cancer start regular screening at age 45, or at 40 for people with a personal or family history of colorectal cancer, a history of inflammatory bowel disease and more.

“Everybody’s always told that you don’t need colonoscopies until you’re 50 years old, and that’s clearly not the case,” Manci said. “In hindsight, I wish I would have gotten screened at 25 or so.”

More groups are planning to revisit their guidelines in the next year or two, Azad said.

“I wouldn’t be surprised if we started to see screenings moving earlier across other guideline committees as well,” Azad said. “This is a very treatable cancer, and it’s a fully preventable cancer if people get their screening.”

usatoday

Cabal Has Hijacked NBA, Balkanisation Is Imminent — Falana, SAN

4

By Lanre Adewole

In another lengthy analysis of the crisis rocking the association, Falana alleged that a cabal had seized the body, dictating its affairs as desired, including at branch level.

He said, “Regrettably, the house has been turned upside down, once again, as its foundation is under serious attack from a cabal of bar leaders who have institutionalised the biennial imposition of national officers through e-fraud elections. “Even branch elections of the NBA are also manipulated with impunity by the same reactionary forces.

Hence, many branches of the NBA are managed, from time to time, by caretaker committees imposed on them by national officers whose own mandate is questionable. “If the NBA does not arrest the ugly development in a decisive manner, as soon as possible, there is going to be an implosion with dire consequences.

Therefore, the lawyers who are desirous to have a united bar should be prepared to ensure that the elections of the officers of the NBA are conducted in a credible and transparent manner while the affairs of the body are managed in a democratic manner.

“Otherwise, the Balkanisation of the NBA is a matter of time. After all, it has just been confirmed that only 18,000 out of the over 200,000 lawyers on the role of legal practitioners in Nigeria participated in the just concluded controversial 2020 NBA election.”

Falana also commented on the withdrawal of the invitation to the Kaduna State governor to speak at the NBA conference, saying the governor was rightly disinvited by the NBA but “the leaders embarrassed Nigerian lawyers when they allowed other fellow abusers of the rule of law and violators of human rights to address the 60th-anniversary conference of the NBA.”

“On realising the discriminatory treatment meted out to el Rufai, the immediate past president of NBA, Mr Paul Usoro SAN was full of apologies. In principle, the NBA had disinvited Professor Maurice Iwu of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) in 2008.

So, a body may be compelled to disinvite its guest, but the grounds must be solid and not self-serving. “By the way, the NBA could not have disinvited Governor Nyesom Wike, having regards to the investment of his government in the NBA. That was why he was made a life bencher by his friends in the echelon of the NBA. So, the NBA cannot afford to embarrass its own life bencher.

“The NBA is the richest professional body in Nigeria. Yet, it goes around cap in hand, begging governors to sponsor its conferences and other programmes. In the process, the NBA has compromised and traded off its autonomy. “Unfortunately, the New Nigerian Bar Association members are breaking away on a wrong footing. No group of lawyers should dismember the NBA in defence of a man who has a penchant for treating court orders with absolute contempt.

“My firm view is that if the NBA is going to break up, let it be on the basis of serious ideological disagreements over the fact that the body has abandoned its aims and objectives for opportunistic reasons.

“Let the promoters of the Northern Nigerian Bar Association challenge the NBA by defending democracy, human rights and public accountability. Let them undertake to defend people the rights of children to education. Let them be prepared to fight against child marriage.

“Lawyers who want to give the NBA a fight should be ready to join the human rights community in promoting the socio-economic rights of the people through public interest litigation. “However, let the defenders of the “united bar” of fraud continue to defend themselves. They will soon realise that the NNBA members are not alone in the planned Balkanisation of the NBA on the grounds of fraudulent elections, financial malpractice, and dictatorship by a tiny cabal that has privatised the NBA,” he said.

In a telephone conversation with Sunday Tribune, the rights advocate said the revolting Northern lawyers were doing the right thing the wrong way. “They are leaving on a wrong footing. You can’t be protesting for (Governor Nasir) el- Rufai, a man who breaches court orders at will.

And they can’t call it New NBA. It is the Northern Bar, but nobody can force anybody to remain when you keep conducting fraudulent elections. “Three times now, you have conducted fraudulent elections and no law says everybody must belong to one professional association.”

Culled from Nigerian tribune

NBA CRISIS: South-West May Likely Follow North

0

By Lanre Adewole

THE crisis rocking the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) is not going away any time soon. Apart from the formation of a splinter group in the North, the South West NBA with the highest number of lawyers has also not abandoned its threat to break away from the national body.

In protesting the outcome of the just-concluded election of the association, South West Lawyers’ Forum known as Egbe Amofin, unequivocally said it would likely lead its members elsewhere, if the election that produced new president, Olumide Akpata, is not voided.

In a letter to the Trustees of the association, Egbe Amofin, which supported the candidacy of Deacon Dele Adesina, SAN, alleged electoral fraud and demanded wholesale cancellation of the election. Responding to the petition from Adesina who lost the presidential contest to Akpata, a member of the Outer Bar, the Trustees, led by a former president of the association, Olisa Agbakoba, SAN, regretted the shortcomings of the poll, but pleaded with the petitioner to accept the outcome in the “larger interest of the NBA.”

Adesina and Egbe Amofinhave yet to make their next line of action known regarding the refusal of the Trustees to void the election. Chief Niyi Akintola, SAN, a frontline leader of Egbe Amofin, who signed the Forum’s disavowal and threat to form a new lawyers’ association, told Sunday Tribune at the weekend that the Forum would meet this week to deliberate on the developing issues within the association.

He didn’t give a specific day of the week for the meeting and was certain a decision had not been taken. He lamented the crisis rocking the association, adding that the leaders of the Bar in the South West are monitoring the situation.

In the heat of the postelection protestation by lawyers from the South West, a name and logo of a supposed new association flew around. The supposed new association’s name was Nigeria Lawyers’ Association (NLA).

Another prominent South West lawyer not opposed to new associations coming out of NBA is Mr Femi Falana, SAN. Immediately after the disputed poll, he had penned an accusatory op-ed, condemning the process and the outcome, noting that nothing made membership of NBA mandatory.

Scion of one of the longest-serving presidents of the association, Chief Ladi Rotimi- Williams, SAN is against factionalisation, but he insisted that if it must be, then it should be in a larger context. Quoting him, “First, I don’t subscribe to NBA being split.

We met it as NBA when we became lawyers and it must remain, except the country itself is split into parts and it is not happening. “I believe in an election someone must win and whoever loses should approach the tribunal or court. Two, (Olumide) Akpata is part of the greater Yoruba nation outside the South-West, so he is one of us. Three, Yoruba themselves are not united,” he said.

Culled from Nigerian tribune