Home Blog Page 7

Yemi Osinbajo, the Orator: “Beware, the mob is fickle

0

By Tonye Clinton Jaja

Oluyemi Oluleke Osinbajo, SAN, GCON, is the Immediate Past Vice President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

Last week, specifically, on 20th February 2025, Yemi Osinbajo was hailed by many as an Orator, as he delivered a speech as the book reviewer during the launch of the autobiography of Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida (IBB).

This week however, the Presidency, he has responded by picking holes in the speech that made many regard Yemi Osinbajo as an orator.

Specifically, the Presidency stated as follows: “I think the former Vice President got it wrong. I think Babangida was not really a tormentor of President Tinubu, don’t forget that President Tinubu said in his own extempore speech that he held Babangida as something, that he was the person that inspired him to get into politics.”

In other words,
the “Special Adviser to President Bola Tinubu on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, stated that it is incorrect for Former Vice President Yemi Osinbajo to label former military President Ibrahim Babangida as Tinubu’s tormentor.”

Yemi Osinbajo would do well to read the history of some of the world’s greatest orators to learn the true nature of citizens who are often fickle.

One minute they are hailing the orator for his rhetoric but the next minute they could be baying for the head of the orator on a spike!!!

Demosthenes was regarded as the greatest ancient Greek orator, the same citizens that previously hailed him, came after him to have him killed, he had to commit suicide by drinking poison in the year 322 B.C.E.

Then there was Cicero, the greatest orator of the Roman Empire, he was assassinated on the orders of Mark Anthony!!!

The reason for this sudden shift or change is because the crowd, the mob is fickle!!!

The definition of “fickle” is:

“Changing frequently, especially as regards one’s loyalties or affections.

“celebs trying to appeal to an increasingly fickle public”

Years ago, anyone in military uniform especially those who were part of the ruling class of Nigeria’s military juntas was regarded as “tormentors” and as an enemy of the public.

However, now the spokesman of the Presidency has made a public statement that a distinguishes between the military juntas, some are to be addressed as “tormentors”, whereas others are to be regarded as “enablers”, blessings in disguise that pushed our PBAT to undertake his political journey!!!

Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja,
Executive Director,
Nigerian Law Society (NLS)

Senator Natasha vs. His Excellency, Akpabio: Pancaking and Transparent Outfit as new additions to the Nigerian Dictionary of Legislative Words and Phrases

0

By Tonye Clinton Jaja

On a lighter note!!!

In the year 1996, Prof. Suleiman Nchi, Faculty of Law, Nasarawa State University wrote a groundbreaking book entitled: “The Nigerian Law Dictionary”.

In the year 2012, Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja’s book: “A Dictionary of Legislative Drafting and Law-Making Terms” was published by Lambert Academic Publishers in Germany.

In the year 2024, both authors agreed to collaborate to publish a book to be entitled: “The Nigerian Dictionary of Law and Legislative Terms” to be funded by TETFUND.

Every passing year, since the publication of the said two books, new words appear that need to be added to the lexicon of Nigerian Law and Legislative Terms.

For example, “budget padding” is a new word/phrase that was recently coined and unique to Nigerian legislature.

Just when we were thinking that we have seen it all, along comes another word: “pancaking”, allegedly written by the Senior Legislative Aide to the President of the Senate, when he wrote: “She (Senator Natasha) thinks being a lawmaker is all about pancaking her face and wearing transparent outfits to the Chambers”.

The problem with these new additions to the lexicon is that they are not yet incorporated in the Standing Orders of the Senate therefore, it would be a challenge for the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions to find Senator Natasha guilty of the twin crimes of “pancaking her face and wearing transparent outfits” since they are not yet labelled as acts of gross misconduct in the Standing Orders of the Senate.

Unless there is going to be an emergency amendment of the said Standing Orders!!!

Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja,
Executive Director,
Nigerian Law Society (NLS).

Apple AI tool transcribed the word ‘racist’ as ‘Trump’

Apple says it is working to fix its speech-to-text tool after some social media users found that when they spoke the word “racist” into their iPhones it typed it out as “Trump.”

The tech giant has suggested the issue with its Dictation service has been caused by a problem it has distinguishing between words with an “r” in them.

“We are aware of an issue with the speech recognition model that powers Dictation and we are rolling out a fix today,” an Apple spokesperson said.

However, an expert in speech recognition told the BBC this explanation was “just not plausible.”

Peter Bell, professor of speech technology at the University of Edinburgh, said it was more likely that someone had altered the underlying software that the tool used.

Videos shared online show people speaking the word “racist” into the Dictation tool.

Sometimes it is transcribed correctly – but on other occasions, it is turned into “Trump”, before being quickly restored to the correct word.

The BBC has not been able to replicate the mistake, suggesting Apple’s fix is already taking effect.

Prof Bell said Apple’s explanation of phonetic overlap did not make sense because the two words were not similar enough to confuse an artificial intelligence (AI) system.

Speech-to-text recognition models are trained by inputting clips of real people speaking alongside an accurate transcript of what they say.

They are also taught to understand words in context – for example, they could distinguish the word “cup” from “cut” if it was within the phrase “a cup of tea”.

Prof Bell says the situation with Apple is unlikely to be a genuine mistake with its data because its English language model would be trained on hundreds of thousands of hours of speech, which should give it a high level of accuracy.

For “less well-resourced languages” he said it could be an AI training issue.

But he said in this case: “it probably points to somebody that’s got access to the process.”

A former Apple employee who worked on its AI assistant Siri told the New York Times: “This smells like a serious prank.”

Apple had to row back on another AI-powered feature last month after complaints from the BBC and other news organisations.

It suspended its AI summaries of news headlines after it displayed false notifications on stories – including one where it said tennis player Rafael Nadal had come out as gay.

The company announced yesterday it would be investing $500bn (£395bn) in the US over the next four year, including on a large data centre in Texas to power Apple Intelligence.

The company’s chief executive Tim Cook also said it may have to change its policies on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) after President Donald Trump called for an end to DEI programmes.

Credit: BBC

Woman stabs husband to death in Bauchi

  • As 23-year-old man beats girlfriend to death in Lagos

The Bauchi State Police Command has arrested one Salamatu Danjuma, a 25-year-old resident of Nadabo village in Tafawa Balewa Local Government Area, in connection with the death of her husband.

According to a statement on Monday by the command’s Police Public Relations Officer, Ahmed Wakil, preliminary investigations showed that the couple had been facing an ongoing domestic dispute regarding the custody of their six-year-old daughter.

Wakil explained, “Despite initial discussions with her family that seemed to favour welcoming the child into their home, the husband later refused, which heightened tensions between them.

“The situation escalated drastically when Salamatu, feeling cornered by her husband’s refusal and in a moment of heated argument, used a knife from their bedroom, resulting in a tragic outcome.”

Likewise, a 23-year-old man, Gbolahan Adebayo has been arrested by the Lagos State Police Command, for allegedly beating his girlfriend to death at Ijedodo in the Alimosho Local Government Area of Lagos State.

PUNCH Metro learnt that the incident occurred during the deceased’s visit to the suspect’s house on Friday.

A resident who identified himself simply as Akin told our correspondent on Monday that the 23-year-old victim was heard screaming for help around midnight while being beaten by her boyfriend.

Akin added that Adebayo later raised the alarm at daybreak after he found out she was no longer responsive after the assault.

He said, “The girl was a regular visitor to the suspect’s home and came around as usual on Friday night. But when it was about 2 am, neighbours started hearing someone screaming and later discovered it was the suspect who was beating her girlfriend in his room. The screaming lasted at intervals for about an hour.

“After that, the screaming stopped. It was in the morning that the boyfriend started shouting for help and when the neighbours who were around at that time went to attend to him, they saw the girl lying motionless on the bed.”

A police source, who spoke to our correspondent on the condition of anonymity because he was not permitted to speak on the matter, said the incident was reported at the Isheri-Oshun Police Division by the suspect’s neighbour on Sunday.

The source said the girl was first taken to the hospital where she later succumbed to the injuries sustained during the incident before it was reported to the police.

“When the neighbour came, he explained that the incident happened two days ago and that efforts were first made to resuscitate the girl but she eventually passed away. As a result, a team of policemen were immediately drafted to the scene, leading to an ongoing investigation.”

When contacted, the spokesperson for the command, Benjamin Hundeyin, confirmed the incident.

The image maker said visible marks of violence were found on the deceased’s body, adding that her corpse had been deposited in the morgue.

He said, “One neighbour reported at Isheri Osun Division that on 21/02/25 at about 2 am, he saw his neighbour, one Gbolahan Adebayo ‘m’ age 23 years beating his girlfriend aged 25 years in his home in Ijedodo for a yet-to-be-determined reason. However, at about 7 am the said Gbolahan Adebayo reportedly screamed for help and on getting to his apartment, the said girlfriend was met lying unconscious on the bed with visible marks of violence found on the body.

“She was immediately taken to a hospital in Ijegun where he was confirmed dead by the doctor on duty. Based on the report, a team of detectives visited the scene of the incident. The hospital was also visited, where the corpse was inspected and photographed. The corpse was evacuated and deposited at the IDH morgue, Yaba for autopsy. The suspect was promptly arrested and an investigation is in progress on the matter,” Hundeyin concluded.

US and Ukraine agree to massive military aid in exchange for US exploration and mining of natural resources

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky will reportedly travel to Washington, DC in the coming days, after the United States and Ukraine agreed to terms on a deal over natural resources and reconstruction, according to a Ukrainian official.

Negotiations have been ongoing for days over a deal that could grant the US access to Ukraine’s rare earth minerals as part of wider negotiations to end Russia’s invasion, as well as US involvement in a reconstruction fund for Ukraine.

According to Reuters, a Ukrainian official said the terms were agreed upon after “everything unacceptable was taken out of the text and it is now more clearly spelt out how this agreement will contribute to Ukraine’s security and peace.”

Details of the agreement are not yet known, but a major sticking point had been a demand from the Trump administration for a $500 billion share of Ukraine’s rare earth and other minerals in exchange for the aid the US had already provided Kyiv, which was previously rejected by Zelensky.

As at press time, the US has not confirmed whether the terms of a deal have been agreed.

“I hear that (Zelensky is) coming on Friday. Certainly, it’s OK with me if he’d like to, and he would like to sign it together with me. And I understand that’s a big deal, very big deal,” US President Donald Trump said from the Oval Office on Tuesday, February 25.

Asked what Ukraine would receive in the mineral deal, Trump said: “$350 billion and lots of equipment, military equipment, and the right to fight on.”

“We’ve pretty much negotiated our deal on rare earth and various other things,” Trump told reporters, adding that “we’ll be looking to” future security for Ukraine “later on.”

“I don’t think that’s going to be a problem,” Trump said. “I spoke with Russia about it. They didn’t seem to have a problem with it. So I think they understand … once we do this, they’re not going back in.”

Ukraine has been pushing for security guarantees, with Kyiv not only keen to see the return of lost territory but also protection against a possible future Russian attack if a peace deal is agreed on.

European leaders have also stressed the necessity for security guarantees for Ukraine as a condition for any future peace talks between Moscow and Kyiv. Following his meeting with Trump, French President Emmanuel Macron on Monday proposed boosting Ukraine’s military capabilities, and if requested to deploy British and French troops to keep the peace.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who will visit the White House on Thursday, has said a US “backstop” is needed for any Ukraine peace deal, which could potentially include security guarantees, American intelligence cooperation, air support and heavy lift transport.

According to CNN, a source said at the weekend that Zelensky could not accept an earlier version of the deal because it contained no American “obligations” while Ukraine was “expected to provide everything.”

During a visit to the White House on Monday, Macron commended Trump for his “decision to work with President Zelensky, and to conclude this agreement that’s so important for the US and Ukraine on rare earths, critical minerals.”

Senate refers Senator Natasha to Ethics committee

Nigeria’s Senate has referred Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan [Kogi Central] to its Committee on Ethics, Code of Conduct and Public Petition for probe and necessary disciplinary action.

This was a sequel to the drama over seating arrangement in the Senate last week Thursday involving Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and the Senate leadership.

The Senate spokesperson, Senator Yemi Adaramodu raised a point of order for the matter to be discussed, claiming his privilege was breached by the attitude of Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan who refused to take the new seat allocated to her.

The senators present at Tuesday’s plenary all condemned the conduct of Natasha, saying it breached the Senate standing rules, which empower the Senate President to allocate seats to senators.

The Senate Leader, Opeyemi Bamidele said the proper thing to do was to refer the matter to the Ethics Committee.

Senator Bamidele also used the occasion to move a motion for a vote of confidence in the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio.

Senator Abba Moro, Minority Leader, who seconded Bamidele’s motion, however, pleaded with Akpabio, as a father to be lenient in handling the issue at hand in the overall interest of the Senate.

The Senate President, Godswill Akpabio referred the matter to the Senate Committee on Ethics Code of Conduct and Public Petition to report back within two weeks.

Read Also: Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan slams N1.3bn lawsuit on Akpabio over alleged defamation

Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan slams N1.3bn lawsuit on Akpabio over alleged defamation

Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has hauled Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, to court over what she described as a defamatory statement against her person.

Last week the Senator, representing Kogi Central in the upper chamber, on the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), had a confrontation with the Senate President after she raised a concern about her seat in the senate that was reassigned without her being notified about the change or the reason behind it,

In a suit filed before the Federal Capital Territory High Court on 25 February 2025, the President of the Senate, the Federal Republic of Nigeria, and the Senior Legislative Aide to the Senate President, Mfon Patrick, were listed as the second and third defendants.

In the suit, marked CV/737/25, Akpoti-Uduaghan, through her lawyer, Victor Giwa, alleged that defamatory statements were made by the Senate President and published by his aide on Facebook.

According to him, the post, entitled “Is the Local Content Committee of the Senate Natasha’s Birthright?” included a statement suggesting that Akpoti-Uduaghan believed being a lawmaker was only about “pancaking her face and wearing transparent outfits to the chambers.”

Giwa argued that the statement was defamatory, provocative, and disparaging, lowering his client’s dignity in the eyes of her colleagues and the public.

She asked the court to make “A declaration that the words, ‘It is bottled anger by the Kogi lawmaker, who knows nothing about legislative rules. She thinks being a lawmaker is all about pancaking her face and wearing transparent outfits to the chambers,’ used and written by the third defendant at the prompting of the first and second defendants, were defamatory and intended to cause public opprobrium and disaffection toward the claimant.”

She also urged the court to restrain the defendants and their associates from making further defamatory statements against her on any platform.

The plaintiff also asked the court for “an order of perpetual injunction restraining the defendants, whether acting by themselves or through their agents, privies, assigns, or associates, from further publishing or causing to be published the said defamatory words or any similar publications about the claimant on social media or in any other manner capable of defaming her.”

Furthermore, Akpoti-Uduaghan asked the court to order the defendants to pay her N100 billion in general damages and N300 million as litigation costs.

“An order for the payment of the sum of N100,000,000,000 as general damages. An order for the payment of the sum of N300,000,000 as the cost of action,” she prayed the court.

IBB: He who borrows till the creditor forgets

0

By Suyi Ayodele

Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife, 1992/1993 academic session: Trendy Professor Adebayo Williams strolled into the class and gave us a term paper to write: “Chaka is a Man sinned against than sinning. Discuss.” Our teacher strolled off.

Professor Williams is a lecturer of delight. He taught my set Literary Criticism in our final year at the university. One of the classics we read for the course is Thomas Mofolo’s “Chaka.” The term paper is about Mofolo’s protagonist, Chaka, a pure-A-heroic character in pure oral characterisation. As Professor Williams strolled off, he left behind a group of rascals shouting, ‘Baba Aro’! What did he want us to write; ‘wicked’ lecturer? We attempted the paper based on our intelligence then. Williams scored every student and then came back to lecture us!

Two weeks later, Professor Williams returned to ‘dissect’ the term paper. The summary of the discourse is that every dictator comes across playing the victim! He passes to the audience, the people, the picture of a victim. And he gains their sympathy more than anyone else. That is what IBB did on our collective sensibilities last week in Abuja.

The legend of a rich man, Olówó-Etí-Ureje (the rich man by the bank of the Ureje River), aptly describes what retired General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida (IBB) depicts in his memoir, “A Journey in Service.” The book of tales was launched in Abuja last Thursday. It is a book every lover of history ought to have. I paid through the nose to get a hardcover copy last Friday, less than 24 hours after it was launched.

Love him or hate him; IBB remains the darling of any discerning mind; any day, anytime! It must be so because the man his friends and foes call the Evil Genius is one person whose personality we cannot ignore. The aura around him is infectious. He has presence, he has candour, even if he is on the negative side of history.

IBB equally has humour, just as he has a good control of the English Language. He is a great non-acerbic polemicist. That’s a contrast; yes! Same way he says being called ‘Evil Genius’ “is a contradiction” because “You can’t simultaneously be a genius and an evil” (Pg 353). A man who laughs off virtually everything is someone one should be wary of; IBB is that man! He tells you he doesn’t join issues with his subordinates, nor does he engage his superiors. What does he do then, you may ask!

The self-styled Military President has never made any mistake about his audience. He demonstrated that in Abuja last Thursday. Only an Evil Genius has the capacity to assemble the figures that gathered for the book launch last week. Only Maradona, a dribbler and a man moulded in the shape of Thomas Mofolo’s protagonist, Chaka, in the epic novel of the same title, could assemble his ‘enemies’ and ‘friends’ under one roof, and all of them would sing his praises to high heavens the way the Minna retired General did. Does IBB have friends; does he have enemies? I doubt it! At least not by what we saw in Abuja last Thursday.

Like the legendary Chaka, IBB was deft at swaying public sympathy at his book launch such that his numerous ‘victims’ rose to salute him, to praise him for inflicting pain on them. Billions of Naira were donated. Those who had nothing to ‘donate’ bought the book at huge prices. On the spot sale attracted N200,000 for a hardcover and N100,000 for a softcover. At the publishers’ bookstore, the copies go for N50,000 and N40,000 respectively! IBB smiled to the bank because he succeeded in playing the victim. We were all his mugu!

Former Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo was the only one who got the gist. Unfortunately, his audience was too laid-back; too torpid, to understand the innuendoes in the presentation made by the professor of Law. They simply laughed off a serious matter of the victims romanticising their tormentors. Such is the prowess, the dexterity of the Evil Genius at manipulating public opinion. Give it to IBB as the undisputed master of that art!

Even the contents of the book (I have read pages of the book as the discussion about it rages in the public space) speak more about the man than any other thing. The TELL Magazine interview of July 24, 1995, published on pages 323 to 359, is my favourite so far. The most interesting material in that interview is the submission of the senior journalists who conducted the interview that “It appears one can never pin you down…” (Pg 153). I read the interview long ago and I find it refreshing reading it again. IBB remained cagey all through the interview. That is vintage Evil Genius!

When juxtaposed with the entire memoir, the interview conducted 30 years ago and the book presented for public consumption less than a week ago, show that nothing has changed in the man, IBB! The length of the interview, a material that takes a whole 36 pages of the book in discourse, and the inability of the senior journalists to pin IBB down to anything, is an indication that till he enters his grave, IBB will continue to dribble us all! The entire “A Journey in Service” itself is about dribbling and “taking responsibility.” IBB is a man who selects his words carefully and understands both the surface and deep structure of every word he utters.

Why did IBB include that lengthy interview in his autobiography? What is the position of an average student of Stylistics on that inclusion? Simple. IBB by that stroke, is saying that there is nothing new to be learnt from “A Journey in Service.” And that is regrettably sad! The Tell Magazine interview of 1995 tells all the stories that need to be told about June 12, 1993, presidential election “won”, according to IBB, by the late Aare Ònà Kankanfo, Moshood Kashimawo Olawale (MKO) Abiola. The only addendum is the act of naming names that IBB introduced in chapter 12, ‘Transition to Civil Rule and the June 12 Saga (pgs 251-288).

Again, why did IBB wait for 32 years before he mentioned those who annulled the June 12, 1993, presidential election? To answer this, we will return to the legend of Olówó-Etí-Ureje (the rich man by the bank of the Ureje River) mentioned earlier.

Ureje River, an ancient river around Ado Ekiti, is popularised by so many stories. One of such stories is that of the rich man who built his house by the banks of the river. History simply gave him a descriptive name, Olówó-Etí-Ureje, because as rich as he was, the rich man stayed permanently by the riverside even when his creditors were scattered all over the place. Yet, he kept no records; mental or written. A very forgetful man!

Olówó-Etí-Ureje was said to be a man who lacked discretion and asked no questions. He trusted his debtors to be honest and faithful in their dealings with him. Though he was the richest and the most generous of his time, the rich man’s indiscretion and lackadaisical attitude were his undoing. Within a short time, he lost his fortunes and became as poor as the church rat. Just one debtor ruined him, and he never recovered as all efforts to bring him back to his prime days failed. How did it happen?

The story stated that one chronic debtor named Ayáwókíolówógbàgbé (He who borrows till the creditor forgets), borrowed money several times from the rich man and refused to pay after eliminating all those involved in the processes leading to the numerous loans.

Ayáwókíolówógbàgbé had the habit of using his numerous slaves as pawns for the loans he took from the rich man. He equally used another set of slaves to stand as guarantors for the loans. A few months to when the loans were due for refund, Ayáwókíolówógbàgbé would use a canoe to cross Ureje River to the other side and ask the pawns in the service of his creditor to cross the river in another canoe to his side to collect the money for the repayment of the loans.

On getting to his own side of the river, Ayáwókíolówógbàgbé would impound the canoes that brought the pawned slaves and ask them to swim back to the other side of the rich man. As slaves, the pawns had no option but to jump into the river and get drowned in the process of swimming back. Those who resisted the order were summarily executed. Since he owned the slaves, nobody would question the slave owner for whatever he did to his property.

Having settled the matter of the pawns, Ayáwókíolówógbàgbé would assemble all the slaves who stood as guarantors for the loans and conscript them for a needless war. At the war fronts, those unfortunate individuals would be given ordinary sticks to confront the opposing soldiers carrying guns and cannons. Your guess is as good as mine about the outcome of the battles and the fates of the slaves.

Thereafter, the debtor would approach Olówó-Etí-Ureje for the reconciliation of the loans. Trust Ayáwókíolówógbàgbé to argue that he had repaid all the loans and insisted that the rich man still owed him for the extra labour the various pawns worked on the rich man’s plantations. In most wicked cases, Ayáwókíolówógbàgbé would also ask for his slave-pawns to be given back to him because he intended to pawn them away somewhere else!

With no records to show; pawns and guarantors to corroborate his claims, Olówó-Etí-Ureje would be forced to give more money to his debtor and also monitise the ‘loss’ of Ayáwókíolówógbàgbé’s slaves! That was how the rich man by the Ureje River became poor and the one who used to borrow money from him became stupendously rich. IBB must have a version of this tale in his Nupe background. The man, like the chronic debtor, Ayáwókíolówógbàgbé, waited for over three decades to tell us the ‘true’ story of what happened to our darling June 12, 1993, presidential election! He told us that MKO won the poll! He mentioned those who cut Abiola’s victory short. Then he took “responsibility” as the man at the top then! Whether we like it or not, no version of that episode can be more authentic than the one from IBB himself. Unfortunately, many of the people IBB mentioned, like the pawns and guarantors in our story above, are long dead and forgotten. The dead don’t tell tales, so they say!

How do we authenticate IBB’s story? Difficult as it was for Olówó Etí Ureje! And what did we do to IBB, our modern-day Ayáwókíolówógbàgbé? We, of course, rewarded him with more credit facilities! If you are in doubt, just check how much IBB raked in from the launch of “A Journey in Service”. Also check out those who gathered to ‘honour’ the man and the beautiful eulogies showered on him by all the Olowo Etí Ureje who gathered at the public book presentation last Thursday. We are a unique people-what in Latin is called: sui generis!

It is only in Nigeria that we can get that kind of crowd that gathered in Abuja for IBB and raised such a huge amount of money! If you add the figures to the ones that were not announced and the ones that will still come from those IBB “made’, you will agree with me why Nigerians have remained poorer and why their oppressors have continued to be richer by the seconds. And what more: the man who rules over us today said he owes his political ascendancy to the man IBB who made it possible for him to go into politics. That was the summary of the testimony of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu at IBB’s book launch!

God knows that I don’t begrudge IBB for whatever he is worth. I have read several comments about the book launch and the ‘anger’ expressed over the June 12 saga. And in all honesty, I see nothing in those comments beyond the usual crowd resentment that will, again, amount to nothing! Pity! If after watching the Abuja book launch and the unity of greed by the attendees, and you still have faith that these locusts in power have the interests of the masses in the hearts, then, you are indeed and, indeed, a man of great faith!

IBB, the man of ‘destiny’, whose future was predicted by a Dibia almost eight decades ago, is 83 years old. I believe so much in the account of the childhood prediction for IBB as narrated by General Abdulsalami Abubakar, the former Head of State. I believe it because I have witnessed such predictions in the past. And on that, I take a bet: if IBB lives to commission his Presidential Library, he will get more donations than it happened in Abuja last week. Why?

It is apodictic that every Ayáwókíolówógbàgbé will become richer at the expense of all Olówó Etí Ureje. We don’t keep records here. We are too forgetful, too forgiving. We are all victims; all Olówó Etí Ureje, including yours sincerely. Even at my level, IBB and his publishers still ripped me off my hard-earned N50,000, the cost of a hardcover copy of “A Journey in Service!” Do I simply say: My head will judge them, or I should ask: who send me?

The Genetics of Twins Amongst Rivers State legislators: How PBAT is fighting to prevent the emergence of a twin Lagos State House of Assembly

0

By Tonye Clinton Jaja

Scientists say that in addition to other factors, genetics is a predominant reason for the emergence of twins.

Going by this logic, it appears that there is something in the DNA and genetics of Rivers State that favours the emergence of twins within the legislative sector of governance.

To put it more accurately, it appears that the DNA and genetics of Rivers State legislators that is predisposed to production of twin legislatures and twin caucuses both at the National Assembly level and at the State House of Assembly level.

Apart from the twin Rivers State Houses of Assembly that is alleged to exist, the Rivers State Caucus at the National Assembly, Abuja is now alleged to also exist as a twin caucus.

On Monday 24th February 2025, an online newspaper reported that:

“The Rivers State lawmakers in the House of Representatives on Monday paid a solidarity visit to the Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. Victor Oko-Jumbo, reaffirming their unwavering support for Governor Siminalayi Fubara’s administration.

The visit comes after a press conference held by some Rivers State National Assembly members in support of former Speaker Rt. Hon. Martin Amaewhule and his group, referred to as the “Committee of Former Lawmakers.”

Led by Hon. Awaji-Inombek Abiante of the Andoni-Opobo/Nkoro Federal Constituency, the Rivers State NASS Caucus dismissed claims that the judgment of Justice James Omotosho reinstated Amaewhule and his 26 colleagues.

The lawmakers maintained that: “Rt. Hon. Martin Amaewhule and 26 others lost their seats in the Rivers State House of Assembly following their voluntary defection on December 11, 2023. Their cross-carpeting happened on the floor of the House in full public view.”

Hon. Abiante cited multiple Supreme Court rulings, emphasizing that Section 109(1)(g) and Section 68(1)(g) of the 1999 Constitution make it clear that:

“Any elected lawmaker who defects from the political party under which they were elected automatically loses their seat.”

He added that since the Supreme Court’s rulings on similar cases have not been overturned, they remain the legal precedent in Nigeria.”

A week earlier, on Monday 17th February 2025, we also read another online newspaper that reported as follows:

“Rivers Assembly Crisis: NASS Caucus Pays Solidarity Visit To Amaewhule Led RSHA
Nigeria Politics
By Nelson Obinna On Feb 17, 2025

…Urges Fubara To Execute Court Judgment
… As Amaewhule Accuses Fubara Of Financial Reckless
The Rivers State Caucus of the National Assembly paid a solidarity visit to Rt. Hon. Martins Amaewhule in Port Harcourt on Monday, where they called on the Executive Arm led by Governor Siminalayi Fubara to execute the judgment of the Court of Appeal, affirming Amaewhule and 27 lawmakers as the only Rivers State House of Assembly.

Reading their position in a statement signed by Rep. Kingsley Chinda, Sen. Barinada Mpigi, and Rt. Hon. Dumnamene Dekor, the caucus expressed concern over the deliberate distortion of facts and judgments of courts by the Governor of Rivers State.

The statement noted that the Governor had procured the services of Senior Advocates of Nigeria, including Mr. Femi Falana, SAN, to misinterpret judgments of court…”

It appears that PBAT does not want this genetics of twins to be transferred and replicated in the Lagos State House of Assembly that is the reason why he has conscripted Elder statesmen like Akande and Osoba to resolve the issue of who is the authentic Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly!!!

Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja,
Executive Director,
Nigerian Law Society (NLS).

Dele Giwa: IBB Lied, By Richard Akinnola

I can understand the denial of General Ibrahim Babangida of his innocence over the murder of Dele Giwa. It is expected. Have you seen an armed robbery suspect charged to court pleading guilty in court? It’s a matter of self-preservation. Even Major Gideon Orkar, who announced on radio the ouster of Babangida in the abortive coup of April 22, 1990, pleaded not guilty before the military tribunal.

So, Babangida’s denial of his government’s involvement in the murder is understandable. However, in doing that, he doesn’t have that latitude of revisionism by deliberately misrepresenting facts. I make reference to two of such.

In his book, General Ibrahim Babangida made two major false assertions regarding the letter bomb murder of Dele Giwa, founding Editor-in-Chief of Newswatch.
It’s either those who wrote the book for him didn’t have the facts or that IBB was just being mischievous.

He said:
“…the Supreme Court’s suggestion that the Newswatch lawyer, Chief Gani Fawehinmi could take on the case as a private prosecutor did not receive a positive response”.

My response:
On Friday, December 18, 1987, the Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision of the seven Justices, upheld the appeal of Gani Fawehinmi, that he had the right to privately prosecute the two Security Chiefs of Babangida he accused of being behind the murder of Dele Giwa.

Pursuant to that judgment, Gani Fawehinmi filed an application at the Lagos High Court, seeking for an order of Mandamus to compel the State’s DPP to either prosecute the two security chiefs or he be given the fiat to do so. The matter was assigned to Justice Olusola Thomas, who, on Thursday, January 21, 1988, made the following order:

“I hereby order that Mr J.A. Oduneye, the former Director of Public Prosecutions (now Solicitor-General of Lagos State), do exercise his discretion whether or not to prosecute Col. Halilu Akilu and Lt-Col. A.K. Togun for the murder of late Dele Giwa and, if he declines to prosecute, that he do endorse a certificate to the effect on the information submitted to him by the applicant on Monday, the 3rd November, 1986. This order of the court shall be carried out on or before Monday 25th day of January, 1988”.

Pursuant to this order, Gani Fawehinmi sent a letter to the DPP, accompanied it with the court’s ruling. Based on this, the Solicitor-General wrote to Gani Fawehinmi that the State was ready to prosecute the suspects.(See annexures 1&2).

On the basis of this, the murder information was filed and it came before Justice Eniola Longe, in the case of The State v. Col. Halilu Akilu and Lt. Col. Kunle Togun.(Charge no. ID/4c/88). The prosecutor was Mrs Eniola Fadayomi, the Attorney-General of Lagos, while Chief Rotimi Williams, SAN, was counsel to the accused persons, who were not in court. Williams raised a preliminary objection to the trial, which was agreed with by the prosecutor. Subsequently, the charges were quashed and the accused persons freed. At the end of the whole saga, there were 38 cases.

Gani Fawehinmi said if he had been granted the fiat to privately prosecute, he would have loved to put Babangida in the witness box. “l have 420 questions for Babangida. Let him stand in the witness box and answer those questions. Then, we will all know who killed Dele Giwa. I think God wants to establish a principle through the death of Dele Giwa. They killed the wrong person and they are targeting the wrong lawyer.”

Still on Dele Giwa, General Babangida said in his book:
“When the Obasanjo civilian administration reopened the Giwa case at the Oputa panel on Human and Civil Rights, l expected that the police and lawyers would come forward with new evidence as to their findings on the Giwa murder over the years. Nothing of such happened”.

My response:
Invitation was extended to Babangida by the Oputa panel, he shunned it. He was wrong to state that the police and lawyers didn’t come up with a new thing at the Oputa panel.
At the Oputa panel, Abubakar Tsav, Commissioner of Police (rtd) gave evidence on oath that he was assigned to investigate the case and at the end of his investigation, his findings pointed to the Babangida government and that he submitted his findings to DIG Chris Omeben.

Also, contrary to what IBB said in his book that no fresh evidence came up, the issue of Gloria Okon came up during the hearing.

Having said these, it’s either those who wrote the book for him didn’t get their facts right or that General Babangida was being mischievous in what he wrote in the book regarding the murder of Dele Giwa.

It is even deceitful to be referring to Dele as your good friend. From where to where? If you could execute your childhood friend, Mamman Vatsa, who then is Dele Giwa, who you only met in the course of his official duties as a journalist? Dele Giwa was not your friend, General.

Richard Akinnola II