Home Blog Page 481

Teen denied admission despite scoring 304 in JAMB cries out

A boy who scored 304 in the last Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME) examinations conducted by the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB)  has gone on X to lament after he was denied admission.

The boy said he took the university entrance exam in 2022 and scored 284, a high score that gets people into the medicine and surgery department, yet he did not get admission.

The teenager who is hoping to be a doctor missed the chance to take the exam in 2023 because he was still waiting for admission.

This year, 2024, he took it again and scored 304, an improvement on his initial JAMB score which was already high.

Notwithstanding his impressive result, however, he was again denied admission this year.

Bemoaning his fate on X, he wrote: “Wait what? 1yr of sleepless nights in vain? Tell me it’s a dream.”

"God knows I fought a good fight" Boy denied admission again despite scoring 304 in JAMB laments as he reveals he

He added: “First JAMB, 2022- Was denied admission.

“Missed 2023 registration while waiting for admission.

“Spent another 1yr home reading.

“2024- Had 304. No admission again.

“My dream to become a doctor in the mud.

“God knows I fought a good fight, will have to move on w/out school.”

"God knows I fought a good fight" Boy denied admission again despite scoring 304 in JAMB laments as he reveals he

“Don’t know who or what to blame… Gotta accept my defeat!” he concluded.

"God knows I fought a good fight" Boy denied admission again despite scoring 304 in JAMB laments as he reveals he

X users are now encouraging him not to give up.

His tweet has sparked a conversation about admissions to Nigerian universities and how people with lower scores get admission while those with higher scores are denied admission because they know no one to help them.

UN’s Anti Israel overreach

By IfeanyiChukwu Afuba 

 It is a troubling time for institutions when their mandate is compromised, privatised or personalised. The more common means of dominating an institution is making it captive of an ideology. This is often the reason why organisations divert from the heart of their constitutions. For instance, in recognition of Nigeria’s multi religious character, the Nigerian Constitution prohibits adoption of any religion as State religion. Yet, Nigeria is forcibly a member of Organisation of Islamic Cooperation.

In mid November 2024, Nigeria participated at the Arab – Islamic summit in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, at the highest levels, even as Nigeria’s non Arab and non Islamic identity conspicuously stood out. Corruption of Nigeria’s university system is proceeding at fast speed because of misdirected anger over poor pay, this, arising from comparison with emoluments of national assembly members. Even academics scandalised by the commercialised processes of university education today are resigned to the inbuilt extortion of students by lecturers. This false order thrives because a rationalisation psyche is in force in the universities. The United Nations too is at such a crossroads today. Founded to promote the cause of world peace, the UN is today increasingly employed to prosecute ideologies of discrimination and domination.

The UN body under threat of derailing from the organisation’s core mandate is the General Assembly. To be sure, the Security Council is privatised; but it was unapologetically framed as such from the beginning. The concept of veto power is nothing but politics of might is right. But the General Assembly was conceived under the principle of equality of nations. It was created to reflect the nuances of global diversity. By this means, it offers a voice to the voiceless in the global stage. The official UN site www.un.org points out that the GA is the “only UN body with universal representation.” But even this level mechanism can be upset, shifted; and has been manipulated against the State of Israel. In it’s subtle persecution of Israel, the GA presents an example of how democracy, an otherwise healthy system can be a disadvantage in equitable decision – making. 

By it’s 193 membership strength, you would expect a wide, multi and diverse range of subjects to be receiving the GA’s attention. And for broad, dispassionate perspectives to be injected into the consideration of these felt concerns from around the world. But, no, the GA is gradually being reduced to a tribunal interrogating petitions against Israel’s right to exist. Israel’s enemies have since perfected a plot for repetitive accusations against Israel. These similar allegations are lodged with the GA on a somewhat rotatory manner so that the subject of Israel’s atrocities is regularly a talking point at the UN. With so much vehemence and theatrics thrown into it, the setting is created for sentiments to influence deliberations on the complaints.

The siege is escalated by the trick of mass numbers ranged against Israel under umbrella identities in what should be disputes between Israel and a specific member state or observer as in the case of Palestine. Whatever space left for objective examination of the issues is further assailed by the noise effect of unceasing petitions. This harangue of Israel at the UN has gone on for too long, and aside the injustice against Israel, it comes at the cost of neglect of other world conflicts.

UN Watch Database of November 3, 2024 records that “from 2015 through 2023, the UNGA has adopted 154 resolutions against Israel and 71 against other countries.” The analysis further shows that in 2024 alone, the UNGA passed 17 resolutions on Israel and only 6 resolutions on the rest of the world. Obviously taking a cue from the UNGA, the UN Human Rights Council has also proved it’s own obsession with Israel. UN Watch Database highlights that “from 2006 through 2024, the Council adopted 108 resolutions against Israel, 45 against Syria, 15 against Iran, 10 against Russia and 4 against Venezuela.”

The preponderance of these sessions on Israel is brought about by ideological influence on the question of the Jewish State. This reconceptualisation, as earlier hinted, leads to externalisation of the inherent issues. Consequently, the Israel – Palestine issue changes to Israel, Arab – Islamic conflict, which configuration automatically puts Israel at huge numerical disadvantage. 

And so, the Middle East crisis is probably more of ideological tussle than it is about land. It’s precisely the contrasting values between Judeo – Christian civilisation and Arab – Islamic heritage that pits a swarm of countries against Israel. This is why Iran, a non Arab State with theocratic rulership, is a ringleader of the plot against Israel. It also explains why almost every Arab – Islamic summit is preoccupied with the Israel agenda. Aside the emotional drive that goes with religion, the anti Israel axis also brings economic pressure to bear on it’s campaign. Between them, the Arab – Islamic solidarity controls no less than seventy percent of the world’s oil resources.

This natural endowment was weaponised against Israel and the United States following the 1973 Yom Kippur war. The impact of the oil sanctions gave rise to the American energy crisis. The economic leverage through oil boycott continues to be used to enlist otherwise unwilling countries into opposition against Israel. Then, there is the awful approach of inciting resentment against Israel with propaganda and disinformation.

We see this tactics actively at play in the Gaza war. While we acknowledge Israel’s excesses in the war, the attempt to condition minds against Israel should be deplored. A few observers have wondered at the ease with which even sections of the Western media lapped up Hamas’ narrative of the war, including dizzying casualty figures and the catchphrase of seventy percent of the victims being women and children.

Do mainstream, independent media really doubt that terrorist armies such as Hamas violates international law by infiltrating civilian infrastructure and exploiting non combatants as human shield? In an article in The Telegraph of 16 December, 2024, Zoe Strimpel highlighted how a study by Andrew Fox, a disinformation researcher and former lecturer at Sandhurst, tore to shreds, Hamas’s casualty figures. Using their very own data for investigation, Fox provides insight into the propaganda of mainly civilian victims. “One way they did this was to list men as women. Adults were also registered as children; twenty – somethings as infants. Natural deaths, in the tens of thousands, were included as well. And the nub of it: the lion’s share of deaths in Gaza were those of fighting aged men.”

Aljazeera, the leading megaphone of the conspiracy against Israel, has been unrelenting in it’s one sided coverage of stories involving Israel. The television station which prides itself in the editorial policy of consistent reference to Arab land seized by Israel as “occupied territory”, finds justification in the provision that “international law prohibits the acquisition of land by force.” The same Aljazeera and their collaborators will say nothing about the UN charter which states: “All members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security are not endangered.” And Aljazeera will not update it’s viewers that the “occupied lands” were lost in defeated acts of aggression against Israel.

The first territories were captured in the post independence war of 1948/1949 in which Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Egypt sought to cripple the State of Israel at birth. More territories were captured in the 1956, 1967 and 1973 wars against the combined militaries of Syria, Egypt and Jordan. These violations of the UN charter mean nothing to Israel’s detractors; their concern being to extract reward for aggression. And why, does Aljazeera not rail at Turkey over it’s occupation of northern Cyprus? Why is Turkey’s defiance of Security Council Resolutions 541 and 550 acceptable to the enforcers of UN declarations?

The hostility and assault against the State of Israel and the Jewish people has not abated. If anything, it has intensified in the past half a century. In the wake of the Gaza war, Israel has faced the unenviable task of fighting on seven fronts against an amalgam of three States and four terrorist militias. What else does Iran’s sectarian dictatorship do except to howl and plot for Israel’s destruction? On the existential threat faced by Israel, Wikipedia tells us: “There have been explicit or implicit expressions, statements and rhetoric made by individuals, political entities and factions within Arab and Islamic discourse advocating for the elimination of the State of Israel as a political entity. These calls often involve the use of strong language, genocidal threats or declarations aiming at the complete eradication of Israel.”

And yet, it’s this same Israel which ought to receive UN special protection in this climate of identity hysteria that is persistently bullied at the UN!

There seems no doubt anymore that Antonio Guterres, the current UN Secretary General has capitulated to the phalanx of anti Israel mob at the UN. A measure of the UN’s wretched position on the Gaza conflict is to always demand for a ceasefire before calling for release of Israeli hostages.This miserable shying away from unconditional condemnation and reversal of lingering incidents of the October 7, 2023 massacre is a betrayal to the very essence of the world body. We are dealing with a leadership of the UN susceptible to selective history of the Middle East crisis.

In his first reaction to Hamas’s murder spree of October 7, Gutteres had in the same breath of condemning the killings, said the massacre did not occur in a vacuum! Gutteres clearly needs help. With this mindset, he renders himself unfit to drive a resolution process on the subject. With antagonistic fixation on Israel, Gutteres leadership does not seem to have found the time nor sensitivity to address other grave issues demanding urgent action from the UN. Over – concentrated on Israel, the UN watched as Russia annexed Ukrainian Crimea before declaring full war against Ukraine.

The bombardment of Ukrainian cities has continued, with energy infrastructure and other critical supplies the targets of overwhelming firepower. But a partisan UN knows when to look the other way. Iran, Iraq and Turkey jostle to outdo the other in their brutal suppression of Kurdish minorities in their States. And a parochial UN has no problem choosing which independence struggles to disregard.

The UN’s hounding of Israel has been counterproductive. It has only served to heighten consciousness about the interests seeking to impose their worldviews on the rest of us. Israel is not about to disappear. But the UN will get weaker by pandering to divisive forces.

Gisele Pelicot: Meet the depraved band of rapists, warped crimes, verdicts and jail terms in full

  • Madame Pelicot makes emotional statement after ex-husband was jailed alongside fellow rapists 

Finally, France’s most horrific sexual abuse case has concluded after a months-long trial with 51 men brought to justice for their heinous crimes.

Dominique Pelicot, 72, now known as the Monster of Avignon, drugged, raped and organised the repeated rape and sexual abuse of his now-ex-wife Gisele Pelicot by dozens of other men.

Firefighters, soldiers, lorry drivers, a DJ and a journalist are among those found guilty of raping 71-year-old Gisele at the behest of her husband Dominique over the course of a decade – all without her knowledge.

On Thursday, Today, the Monster of Avignon was slapped with a 20-year prison term by Judge Roger Arata after he pleaded guilty to drugging her repeatedly for almost a decade to rape her and to offer up her unconscious body for sex to dozens of strangers.

Several abusers have escaped justice, with police unable to identify more than 20 men involved in Gisele’s abuse.

But Arata handed down guilty sentences to another 50 men besides Pelicot, many of whom contacted Gisele’s husband online and were invited to his home in the sleepy Provence village of Mazan to assault his unconscious wife on camera.

In all, the court found 47 of the defendants guilty of rape, two guilty of attempted rape and two guilty of sexual assault.

Chaos erupted outside the courtroom with a large group of baying protesters gathered outside shouting ‘shame on you’ as the defendants emerged, hiding their faces behind masks and under hoods.

Meanwhile, the lawyer for one defendant who was found guilty of sexual assault but walks free having already spent the length of his sentence behind bars was filmed laughing at the protesters, labelling them ‘a bunch of hysterical knitters’ and taunting them by saying ‘my client has a message for you – the message is s***’.

He went on to say: ‘Your request for 20-year prison sentences for all the defendants has been refused… My client walks free, he says ‘Up yours!’

Now, as the trial comes to a close, these are the disturbing testimonies and astonishing excuses given by the men accompanying Pelicot in court, along with their verdicts and sentences in full.

Dominique Pelicot, 72

Pelicot, who had been with Gisele for 50 years and shares three children with her, has admitted to serially raping and allowing others to abuse his wife.

‘I am a rapist just like all the others in this room,’ he said, adding: ‘I ask my wife, my children, my grandchildren to accept my apologies. I regret what I did. I ask for your forgiveness, even if it is not forgivable.’ 

Pelicot told the courtroom he had a difficult upbringing and had himself been a victim of rape, crying at times as he gave his testimony.

He said he had wanted his wife to participate in partner swaps and her refusal, together with trauma from his youth, had helped to trigger his abusive behaviour.

‘It became a perversion, an addiction,’ he told the courtroom. 

Pelicot said he had filmed the acts of abuse as an insurance policy in case one of the men involved reacted poorly. He was on Thursday found guilty and sentenced to 20 years in jail. 

The Monster of Avignon’s lawyer Beatrice Zavarro said no decision has yet been made on whether he will appeal his sentence.

She says she will not criticise any decision made by the courts, adding they now had 10 days to discuss whether to bring forward a challenge to the ruling.

Thierry Postat, 61, refrigeration specialist

The father-of-three denied raping Gisele on August 21, 2020, saying he did not see anything out of the ordinary about the night in question and had previously had encounters with couples where the man had given consent for the woman.

‘I always thought Mrs Pelicot would wake up,’ he told the court. ‘She wasn’t cold, she wasn’t dead, her skin was soft.’ 

The 61-year-old is also charged with possession of hundreds of child abuse images which were found after his arrest in the Pelicot case, charges he admits to.

Found guilty of aggravated rape and possessing child pornography, sentenced to 12 years in prison and banned from working with children for life.

Lionel Rodriguez, 44, supermarket worker 

The father-of-three admitted that he was guilty of raping Gisele on December 2, 2018 – though he said he had not intended to. 

‘Since I never obtained Gisele’s consent, I have no choice but to accept the facts,’ he told the court, before apologising to his victim for the ‘nightmare’ she had endured.

He added: ‘I never told myself: ”I will rape that woman”,’ but admitted that he should have left when he saw Gisele was unconscious, and that it was cowardly of him not to have said anything. 

He put some of the blame on Pelicot, saying he had done what the husband had told him to do.

Found guilty of aggravated rape, sentenced to eight years in prison. 

Click here to read about the other men.

Gisele Pelicot speaks after the judgment

Gisele Pelicot gave a powerful statement after the jailing of her depraved husband and his rapist accomplices, saying she has ‘never regretted’ her decision to waive her anonymity and that she did so to reveal to the world what they had done.

Dominique Pelicot cried as he was sentenced to the maximum of 20 years in prison for raping and organising the mass rape of his wife – with all of his 50 co-defendants also receiving guilty verdicts for their part in France’s most notorious sex crimes trial. 

Madame Pelicot later emerged from the courtroom to the waiting cameras of the world’s media, saying she was ’emotional’ as she issued a statement after what she said had been ‘a very difficult test for me.’

‘I am thinking first and foremost about my children, David, Caroline and Florian. I am thinking also about my grandchildren. For them I really wanted to take this struggle forward.

‘I’m thinking about all the other families affected by the case and the not recognised victims in the shadows… I share their struggle.’

She went on to share her ‘deepest gratitude’ to all those who supported her throughout the trial, describing how ‘witness statements and testimonials really gave me strength to keep coming back’ throughout the three-month ordeal.

Referring to why she waived her anonymity, she said: ‘I wanted when I started with this case on September 2 to ensure that society could see what was happening and I have never regretted this decision.

‘I want to take hold of a future in which everybody, women and men, can live together in harmony, respect and mutual understanding.’

[Video] Chief Mrs. Victoria Awomolo, SAN marks 67th birthday in style

Born on December 18, 67 years ago in Ilesha, Osun State, Chief Mrs Olufunmilayo Victoria Awomolo, SAN taught Chemistry at Queen Elizabeth School, Ilorin, for 10 years before studying Law.

Ever acknowledging the support of her husband Asiwaju Adegboyega Awomolo, SAN, she said: “Even as a pure science person, he told me that I was intelligent enough and could do it. He encouraged me and I got admission into the University of Ibadan through direct entry.

FIDA Abuja members, Mrs Omaka, Adama Mohammed, Mrs Osipitan, and Ifeoluwa Johnson celebrate with the Learned Silk

“Whenever I finished a semester, he would say one down, seven more to go. I was lucky I did not get any carryover.”

The 18th female Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) was a Regional Vice President, Africa North and West of the International Federation of Women Lawyers (FIDA). 

Watch the celebrant’s birthday steps as captured by Adama Mohammed.

Smart, agile, combining brain with beauty, the 67-year-old celebrant who hails from Kogi State insists that every woman has worth.

The Learned Silk with zero tolerance for abuse and domestic violence warns women who choose to remain in toxic relationships because of their children to run as their children want them alive.

Chief Mrs. Victoria Awomolo, SAN

Also, Chief Mrs Awomolo maintains there is no such thing as an overnight success. For her, those who crave success must embrace diligence to refine themselves or their ability in preparation for opportunity when it knocks.

The young Funmilayo attended Salvation Army Primary School, Ilesha and later gained admission to IIesha Grammar School for her Secondary education. Thereafter proceeded to Kwara State College of Technology for her ‘A’ levels.

In 1981 she graduated from the University of Benin with a degree in Chemistry and at the University of Ibadan where she obtained an LLB in 1996, she was the best graduating student in Labour Law.

Historic French Trial: Monster of Avignon who got more than 50 men to rape wife over 10-year-period jailed 20 years

  • Other accomplices jailed

The man who has come to be known as the Monster of Avignon, for drugging his wife over a 10-year-period and arranging more than 50 men to rape her, Dominique Pelicot has been found guilty of all the charges against him in France ‘s most notorious sex crime trial.

The 72-year-old Pelicot who pleaded guilty to all the charges against him, including the aggravated rape of his wife Gisele Pelicot and the rape of the wife of one of his co-defendants, has been sentenced to 20 years in prison; with prosecutors seeking terms of between four and 18 years for the other defendants.

A panel of five judges at the criminal court in the southern French city of Avignon pronounced Pelicot guilty on Thursday of orchestrating the drugging and the raping of his wife for almost a decade, offering up her body to his 50 co-conspirators.

Almost all of the 50 co-defendants – aged between 27 and 74 – were accused of raping Gisele Pelicot. Some of the men acknowledged wrongdoing, while others said they believed she had consented to sex

In total, 51 men were sentenced to more than 400 collective years behind bars with all of Pelicot’s accomplices found guilty of sex crimes with 46 convicted of rape, two of attempted rape and two of sexual assault. 

Gisele Pelicot, who is also 72, was seated on one side of the courtroom, facing the defendants as the presiding judge, Roger Arata, announced one guilty verdict after another.

Working his way through the first names on the list, Arata declared: “You are therefore declared guilty of aggravated rape on the person of Mme. Gisele Pelicot.”

Delivering the verdict, Arata said Dominique Pelicot would not be eligible for parole until he has served two thirds of his sentence.

The lawyer for Dominique Pelicot said after sentencing that her client was considering lodging an appeal. He and the other defendants have 10 days to decide on this.

A cheer went up outside the court among the victim’s supporters when news of the first guilty verdicts filtered out.

During the trial, Dominique Pelicot admitted that for years he knocked his then-wife of 50 years out with drugs so that he and strangers he recruited online could abuse her while he filmed the assaults.

He denied misleading the other defendants, saying they knew exactly what they were doing. “I am a rapist like the others in this room,” he said during testimony.

Gisele Pelicot waived her right to anonymity during the hearings and demanded that horrifying videos of the serial abuse, which were recorded by her former husband, should be seen in court.

“I’ve decided not to be ashamed, I’ve done nothing wrong,” she testified in October. “They are the ones who must be ashamed,” she said.

Pelicot has become a feminist champion in France as the historic case has profoundly shaken the country over the past several months.

“I wanted all women who are rape victims to say to themselves: ‘Mrs Pelicot did it, so we can do it too,’” she told the court in October.

She now uses her maiden name, but during the trial has asked the media to use her former name as a married woman.

The Pelicots’ children, David, Caroline and Florian, arrived in court to hear the verdict alongside their mother.

Background

For three and a half months Giselle Pelicot has attended court hearings in Avignon, France against her former husband and 50 other men accused of raping her while she was drugged unconscious. Pelicot’s insistence that the trial be made public to raise awareness of the dangers of the drug used on her and her refusal to be shamed has won her international acclaim.

Her husband orchestrating her sexual abuse by strangers could have broken her. But by standing up to her abusers in court and demanding they be ashamed, France‘s Gisele Pelicot has become a feminist champion.

Details of the unprecedented scale of Pelicot’s warped campaign to watch his wife being abused over more than a decade emerged during a trial that began in September and resumes today – a case which has horrified the world.

The trial will reach its conclusion with the dozens of men accused hearing verdicts and if they are convicted, the judge will proceed to sentence them to jail terms of between four and 18 years each, meaning they face more than 600 years in prison.

The only defendant likely to receive the maximum sentence of 20 years is Pelicot himself. He spoke publicly for the last time this morning to apologise for the betrayal of his wife.

The retired electrician praised Gisele Pelicot’s courage and appealed to her and their children for forgiveness for the terrible ordeal he had put them through by his twisted pursuit of sexual gratification.

Sitting in the dock of the Vaucluse Criminal Court, the 71-year-old, said: ‘Hello, I would like to start by saluting the courage of my ex-wife, who was forced to put up with the suggestions that she was complicit [in the rapes].

‘I ask her, the rest of the family, to please accept my apologies: I regret what I have done. I am sorry for making them suffer for over four years.  

‘I am just a working man and I want to tell my family that I love them, you have the rest of my life in your hands. I ask for your forgiveness.’

The bravery of his victim wife, Madame Pelicot, in allowing her identity to be revealed around the world – and the dignity with which she conducted herself throughout the trial – has seen the case become a cause célèbre for campaigners against sexual violence.

Mme Pelicot held her head high as she heard and watched films covertly taken by her husband of 50 years in which she was abused at least 90 times by strangers he had invited into their home.

Having waived her legal right to anonymity in order to ensure the case received the maximum amount of publicity, the 72-year-old grandmother refused to be shamed – but instead repeatedly directed any shame at her abusers.

As interest in the case grew, Madame Pelicot was clapped and cheered as she arrived at court and left at the end of the day. 

Graffiti honouring her bravery was daubed on Avignon’s medieval stone walls and protests in support of her erupted all over France.

Opening proceedings in the final week of this four-month trial, Judge Roger Arata told the court that all matters had now been concluded and the only procedure left was for the defendants to make their final statements.

Judge Arata declared: ‘It remains to give the floor to each of the accused. And I ask the question that applies to all of them: do you have anything to add in your defence?’

Pelicot – who is accused of drugging his wife of 50 years and inviting strangers he recruited on the internet to rape his wife – was the first to speak.

He thanked his lawyer, the court staff and his gaolers for treating him with the respect few believed he deserved.

Pelicot told the court: ‘I would like to thank the court for simple reasons: it allowed me to remain seated each time I entered the room, which was interpreted as a lack of respect during the proceedings. Which is not the case. Without protection, you die in prison.’

He continued: ‘I was saddled with names and titles when I would prefer to be forgotten. 

‘I find it difficult to continue because I would like to thank the prison officers who have been humane and professional towards me. I thank you, Mr Zavarro, for your loyalty.

He concluded by claiming the ultimate punishment was the loss of his family. He said: ‘The deprivation of not seeing one’s loved ones is worse than the deprivation of freedoms.’

Pelicot was followed by the dozens of co-accused, many of whom continued to protest their innocence.

Pelicot’s accomplices packed into the courtroom in Avignon for the final week of the trial that has shone a light on France’s worst sex case in decades. 

Dressed casually in jeans, hoodies, thick sweaters and t-shirts the co-defendants still at large chatted amongst each other.

Just a few feet away Madame Pelicot appeared in good spirits as she talked with her lawyer Stephane Babonneau.

Dressed in a cream coloured sweater and a beige scarf, the courageous grandmother smiled as she chatted with her defence team – and the court appointed welfare officer who has accompanied her throughout the four-month-long trial.

Madame tipped her head back as she listened to her ex-husband.

And she sat motionless as she listened to Pelicot’s accomplices beg for her forgiveness.

One defendant said: ‘If I had the opportunity for restorative justice for you I would do it willingly.’

Madame Pelicot looked ahead, refusing to lock eyes with her abusers.

One by one Pelicot’s accomplices took the microphone to offer their excuses for raping unconscious grandmother Gisele, and to ask for her forgiveness in almost equal measure.

After just over an hour, trial judge President Roger Arata, announced that he and his four assisting judges would now retire until Thursday morning when they will begin to deliver the verdicts of the accused.

Prosecutors have based their sentencing demands to the court for each defendant on aggravating factors including how many times they came to the Pelicot home and the extent of documented sexual contact.

By this assessment the worst offender, for whom prosecutors suggest an 18 year tariff, was a 63-year-old known as Romain V. He was knowingly HIV-positive yet is accused of raping Mme Pelicot on six separate occasions without wearing protection.

Because the incidents were meticulously recorded by Pelicot the defendants have been unable to deny sexual contact with the victim – but most have claimed they were unaware of the circumstances Pelicot had engineered.

French criminal law defines rape as any sexual act committed by ‘violence, coercion, threat or surprise’ but makes no reference to any need for consent – an aspect that campaigners have fixed on as outdated and wrong.

The trial heard in disturbing detail how while outwardly a doting husband, retired electrician Dominique, was secretly engineering what may possibly be the greatest marital betrayal of all time.

And as the evidence has been revealed, his 50 accomplices have wriggled and squirmed and repeatedly tried to protest their innocence.

One defendant told police; ‘rape is not possible if a woman’s husband is present’, another claimed a man; ‘can do what he likes with his wife’, while most said they believed they were taking part in a ‘kinky sex game’ in which Madame Pelicot was a willing party.

One defence lawyer, the head of the criminal bar in Avignon, Master Guillaume de Palma, even told the court rape ‘cannot occur’ if the perpetrator did not ‘mean to’. His remarks, in the second week of the trial, prompted outrage across France and added to the growing calls for justice for women.

However, the scores of videos of the unbridled truth, taken by Pelicot over ten years and shown in court to the shame-faced defendants and members of the public who queued every day to watch the real-life drama play out, left very little room for doubt.

Tossed around like a ‘rag doll’, and often snoring, Madame Pelicot, could be seen to be clearly unconscious and unable to give her consent.

In an electrifying 90-minute testimony, she told the hushed Avignon court: ‘I was sacrificed on the altar of vice.

‘My body might have been warm, but I was like a dead person. I was a dead woman, and these men take advantage of me, they defile me, they treat me like a bin bag.

‘They didn’t rape me with a gun or knife to their heads – they raped me in full consciousness. They treated me like a ragdoll. It is unbearable, and I don’t know if I will ever be able to get up [off the floor] again.’

Her abusers, most from within a 50 mile radius of the Pelicots’ home, were seemingly ordinary men from all walks of life.

The fact that broadly represented a cross section of French society saw them collectively described as Monsieur-Tout-Le-Monde – or Mr Everyman.

There was veteran chief fireman Christian Lescole, 57, who protested in court at being locked up after spending ‘a lifetime saving people’. Police also found naked pictures of children on his computer following his arrest.

Moroccan-born hospital nurse Redouan El Farihi screamed his innocence before a video of him assaulting Madame Pelicot while she lay motionless was played in court.

There was ‘sexual predator’ Jerome Vilela, a supermarket worker, who was described by his ex-partner as a ‘sex-addict’ and told a prison psychologist he saw sex as a ‘conjugal right’.

Successful builder Thierry Parisis told the court he had fallen into a spiral of depression and alcoholism following the death of his son in a car crash. He added he remembered very little about his encounter with Madame Pelicot.

Retired marine fire-fighter Jacques Cubeau said he was lonely.

There was IT worker Lionel Rodriguez, 44; painter and decorator Husamettin Dogan, 43; odd-job man Mathieu Dartus, 53; motorcycle mechanic and racer Hugues Malago, 39; and farm worker Andy Rodriguez, 37.

And there was Romain Vandevelde, a 63-year-old man with HIV who visited the Pelicots on six different occasions between December 2019 and June 2020 to rape Madame Pelicot and refused to wear a condom.

These are just a handful of the strangers that took part in the mass rape that has put the tiny village of Mazan, that lies in France’s most picturesque region, Provence, on the map. 

Retired electrician Dominique Pelicot met each of his accomplices on an internet site for voyeurs called ‘a son insu’ which translates as ‘without them knowing’.

Over almost ten years he invited strangers – up to three times a week – to come to the couple’s retirement chalet to rape his wife, which he had rendered unconscious by putting powerful sedatives in her dinner and glass of rose wine.

To ensure they weren’t seen, Pelicot told the would-be rapists to park well away from the house, avoid wearing after-shave or smelling of cigarette smoke, and ensure they left nothing behind in the bedroom.

He choreographed the multiple rapes of his sleeping wife with such attention to detail that a lawyer described him in court as a ‘perverted Steven Spielberg’.

The potentially fatal doses of sedatives forced upon Madame Pelicot had a devastating effect on her health. She lost weight, her hair fell out and she suffered lengthy blackouts. Her doctor feared she was in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease. She also became infected with four sexually transmitted diseases. She had no idea how.

The abuse only stopped when Pelicot was arrested in October 2020 for taking pictures of women’s underwear on his phone at his local supermarket – a tacky form of voyeurism known as ‘upskirting’.

A search by gendarmes of his home discovered some 20,000 lurid images and images of his wife being violated in the marital bed on computer files and mobile phones.

The following month, while returning home from Paris where she had been looking after her grandchildren, detectives asked Madame Pelicot to come to the police station.

At first, she did not recognise the woman lying on the bed unconscious being abused in the photograph that the policeman showed her. Then she saw it was herself and that she had been used by her husband of 50 years in the depraved sex scenes he filmed.

‘That day will be seared in my memory for ever,’ Madame Pelicot told the court. ‘It was a scene of barbarism. I was in a state of shock.

‘I remember asking for a glass of water, then a psychologist came into the room, they said my husband had been detained – and everything just collapsed for me.

‘We were 50 years together, with three children and seven grandchildren, and our friends said we were the ideal couple. I just couldn’t take it in.’

Returning alone to the house where she had been so cruelly betrayed, she called her grown-up children – David, Caroline and Florian – to tell them their father was a monster.

Three days later she arrived in Paris with just two suitcases and her dog, never to return to Mazan.

Asked before the trial court how she reacted on learning how she had been abused by the father of her three children, she replied: ‘He disgusts me. I feel dirty, defiled, betrayed. It was a tsunami. I was hit by a high-speed train.’

Pelicot told investigators he carried out his warped fantasies because he was ‘bored’ and blamed his arrest for ‘disrupting his happy life’. He also hinted that he continued to hold a grudge against his long-suffering wife for a brief affair she had over 30 years ago.

The grown-up children have all disowned their father.

But courageous Gisele – whose divorce from her perverted ex-husband was confirmed in the days before the trial began in September – vowed to keep her marital name during the proceedings to protect her children and grandchildren who are also called Pelicot.

However, the family’s pain did not stop there.

During the four-year police investigation into this most cruel case of betrayal, detectives uncovered a file entitled: ‘My Daughter Naked’.

In it were photographs of Caroline Darian, as a young woman, lying asleep on a bed, dressed in lingerie and partially naked.

The pictures were taken at the family home in Villiers-sur-Marne, near Paris, before 2013 when Pelicot retired and moved to Mazan in the south of France.

Caroline Darian has written a book about the trauma she suffered after learning her father, who she had idolised, was serial sex attacker, entitled: ‘I No Longer Call You Daddy.’

At different stages of the long trial Caroline Darian confronted her father about whether he had sexually abused her – as well as her mother – storming out of court several times in distress.

But in his final statement, Pelicot admitted to the court that he was a sex addict but denied drugging his daughter Caroline and taking photographs of her semi-naked on a bed dressed in her mother’s lingerie.

Turning to his daughter, he said: ‘Caroline, I never did anything to you.’

But in a furious outburst, Caroline Darian screamed: ‘You are lying! You’re not telling half the truth, even about your ex-wife! You will die alone like a dog and caught out in lies!’

Under questioning from his lawyer, Pelicot accepted he would ‘die like a dog’ in jail for the crimes he had committed, but refused to give his beloved daughter the truth she needed.

And while France’s worst husband knows he has seen his family for the last time, he is expected to appear in court again, as Pelicot faces further allegations of rape and murder after France’s cold case bureau in Nanterre linked him with at least six hitherto unsolved crimes.

Pelicot has admitted the rape of a young estate agent in the Paris suburb of Villeparisis in 1999 but denies being involved in the murder of another estate agent Sophie Narne in another Paris in another suburb eight years earlier and other similar cases.

The Pelicot case in terms of the number of defendants is not the largest sex crime case in French history – in that regard, it is eclipsed by the child-sex rings that operated in the city of Angers in the early 2000s.

However, the globally high-profile trial has meant that it is almost certainly the most notorious.

Credits: Daily Mail online and Al Jazeera 

Nigerian man says “our society is set up to encourage young men to justify, engage in infidelity with audacity and impunity”

Shamseddin Giwa, a Nigerian marriage therapist, has said that the society is set up to encourage young men to justify infidelity and bad behaviours.

The father of four also stated that many men do not truly want submissive wives. According to him, they want voiceless women who would take whatever they do and continue to stay loyal. 

Our society is set up to encourage young men to justify and engage in infidelity with audacity and impunity - Nigerian man says
Our society is set up to encourage young men to justify and engage in infidelity with audacity and impunity - Nigerian man says

Travellers narrate how security agents make the highway hell

By Emma Nnadozie

As the holiday season sets in, the usual extortion and inconveniences caused motorists and passengers on the highway are at their peak.

Nigerians are once again forced to confront the harsh reality of rampant extortion by different security agencies on the nation’s highways.

Despite official claims of ignorance, an increasing number of motorists and travellers are becoming victims of harassment, intimidation, and even unlawful detention by security agencies manning roadblocks.

Many holidaymakers end up being extorted and even detained or their vehicles seized at the slightest whimper by security agents on the nation’s highways.

Season of exploitation

With the alarming presence of security forces at every turn, it’s clear that the festive season has also become a season of exploitation.

Notably, the highways are scenes of several security agencies that mount roadblocks at very short distances. Worse still, criminals and kidnappers have continued to hold sway, despite their presence.

Many Nigerians and foreigners have tales of woe over the disturbing trend of events. There are numerous accounts of victims who have endured these brutal encounters, shedding light on the untold suffering many face while navigating the very roads meant to keep them safe.

From unexpected vehicle seizures to demands for huge bribes, the stories are endless and chilling.

In the face of this injustice, the question arises: Why are these abuses allowed to flourish, unchecked?
However, the police authorities in a swift reaction, said policemen were not sent out to extort or harass motorists or travellers, saying deployment of policemen to highways was solicited by state governors.

Victims’ accounts

But one of the victims of police extortion, an engineer, resident in Lagos, who pleaded anonymity, narrated his pitiful encounter along one of the highways.

He recounted: ‘’As I embarked on a journey from Lagos to the Eastern part of Nigeria, I was filled with a mix of excitement and trepidation. The excitement stemmed from the prospect of reconnecting with family and friends, while the trepidation was rooted in the notorious reputation of Nigeria’s highways.

‘’My experience would later confirm my fears, as I encountered a plethora of security operatives, including police, military, Federal Road Safety Corps, FRSC, and Customs personnel, who seemed more interested in lining their pockets than ensuring the safety of travellers.

‘’I also ran into groups of dishevelled-looking youths who claimed to be local government officials asking after vehicle licenses and tax receipts in virtually all the areas I traversed.

“The extortion spree began almost immediately after I left Lagos. At nearly every checkpoint, I was stopped by security operatives who demanded bribes, often under the guise of ‘routine checks’ or ‘security protocols.’
‘’The amounts varied from N200 to N500, but the persistence and audacity of the operatives were consistent.

Harrowing experience at Ore

‘’One particularly harrowing experience occurred at a police checkpoint in Ore, Ondo State, where an officer who claimed to be searching for ‘stolen vehicles,’ demanded that I produce my car’s papers.

‘’After scrutinizing the documents, he declared that my vehicle’s registration had expired, despite my protests that it was still valid. The ‘fine’ for this alleged infraction? A whopping N10, 000. It was clear that this was nothing more than a shakedown, and I reluctantly parted with N2,000 to avoid further hassle.

“Similar experiences played out at military checkpoints in Asaba, Delta State, and Customs checkpoints in Onitsha, Anambra State. At each stop, I was forced to part with some amount of money, simply to avoid being delayed or harassed further.

‘’As I continued with the trip, I also encountered battle-ready officers of the Federal Road Safety Corps, FRSC, who blocked the road with their official vehicle frantically searching almost every vehicle plying the highway.

‘’The resultant effect is that many holiday makers are seen desperately pleading to be left to take their families home and by so doing, they are forced to part with various amounts of money, based on frivolous claims by the officers.”

Multiple complaints

A check by Vanguard on the X platform revealed multiple complaints from Nigerians raising alarms over the numerous checkpoints manned by security operatives reportedly extorting money and asking for unnecessary documents from motorists in an attempt to further exploit them.

One of such travellers, journeying from Abuja to Enugu with Peace Mass Transit, shared a harrowing experience on X, explaining how police in Enugu State used a Point of Sale, POS machine to collect N1million from his younger brother after kidnapping him and taking him to a nearby bush.

The X user, with the username Mr_Robmichael1, wrote: “They stopped the @PMTNigeria bus he was travelling in and asked all passengers to get down for a stop-and-search. My brother got down with his luggage but left his smaller bag on the seat.

‘’They (policemen) turned the story around, claiming he was hiding something inside. They found only perfumes and body spray when they opened the small bag. They then opened his main box, searched it, and discovered his medications.

‘’He explained that he was taking antibiotics for a cold. They also found both an i-Phone and an Android phone, prompting them to label him a fraudster.

“They told him they would take him to the EFCC, and he agreed. They instructed the bus driver, @PMTNigeria, to leave, and he did. They then drove my brother to the EFCC roundabout, making three turns.

‘’They told him to settle the matter or they would take him in. He responded that they should go ahead and do that. Then, they left the EFCC roundabout, drove him to a nearby bush and threatened to kill him if he didn’t pay them N3million.

‘’He explained that there was no money in his account. Unfortunately, a credit alert notification popped up on his phone. They saw it and became angry with him for lying about not having money.

‘’They pointed a gun at him and forced him to open his phone and bank app, which he did. They saw that he had a balance of N1million and drove him to a nearby POS shop where they withdrew all the money from his account. Since he was traveling to Umuahia, they dropped him off at Peace Mass Park in Garki.”

Another X user, named Dolapo, shared his harrowing experience on X, detailing how he escaped the claws of men of the Nigeria Police Force after revealing his identity: “Usually, when I go out, I am never alone. I have a security detail, and most times I wear a touch of camo, so I have never been bothered.

‘’Tonight, I decided to just freestyle and go out by myself. Went to this rave, had fun, and decided to check out another spot.

“My cab had just pulled up when a police officer walked up to me. He had his weapon raised, so I told him to, at least, lower it if we were going to have a conversation. He pushed me aggressively, and as a soldier, my first instinct was to protect myself.

‘’I quickly shoved his weapon aside. Right then, two other police officers joined, and one even shot his weapon. Like that was going to scare me, lol. I guess that threw them off, and a fight with three of them ensued. And because they couldn’t take me down, I was now getting pepper-sprayed.

‘’Before I knew it, three police officers were on me. I didn’t even want to identify myself as anything other than a regular civilian, but I guess from the ‘accent’ they thought I could be intimidated.

‘’They were saying I’d be taken to the station, lol. Ten minutes had passed when four men arrived—three in military uniforms and one in civilian clothes. As soon as they asked what was going on, that was when I told them who I was.

‘’The dynamic of the whole situation changed. The police officers started acting nice and wanted to listen. I just told the military guys that I wanted to go back to my hotel. One of the officers offered to have his men take me, but I declined. At that point, I was just too upset. They helped flag down a taxi, and now I’m on my way as I type this.”

…and Vanguard editors

Similarly, a group of editors from Vanguard Newspapers, Lagos, had an ugly experience a few weeks ago while travelling to Benin City for a funeral ceremony. They were stopped at a point on entering Ore by armed policemen who demanded for the particulars of their car.

The driver gave them the particulars, one of the policemen swiftly glanced at it and while he was doing that, about eight touts sitting close to them moved fast and surrounded their car, claiming to be local government officials.

They demanded for their tax and radio receipts of the car. Enraged by the frivolous demands, the editors jumped out of their car and confronted them. Shockingly, while both parties were accosting each other, the armed policemen ignored them all and were busy stopping other vehicles plying same highway.

Call IGP — Police challenge

The editors confronted the policemen, demanding to know why they allowed touts to terrorize motorists under their watch but the policemen remained recalcitrant, asking them (editors) to call the Inspector General of Police if they were not satisfied with what was happening.

After the editors managed to escape from the scene, they reported the ugly incident at the Area Command and the second in command to the area commander and the Divisional Police Officer, DPO. They swiftly mobilized armed men who rushed to arrest both the policemen and the thugs.

‘Unfortunately, before they got to the point with the editors, the erring policemen and thugs had disappeared after an unknown person alerted them.

Findings

Investigations revealed that the proliferation of checkpoints on Nigerian highways is largely a response to the growing menace of kidnapping, which has become a major security concern in the country.

Kidnappers have been known to operate wearing security personnel’s uniforms, making it difficult for travellers to distinguish between genuine security operatives and impostors. The checkpoints are intended to serve as a deterrent to the kidnappers and to provide an additional layer of security for commuters.

However, while the intention behind the checkpoints is commendable, the reality is that some security personnel have exploited the situation for personal gains, turning the checkpoints into extortion points.

A private security personnel, Jide Osiniwo, in hs reaction to the development, said: “This abuse of power undermines the trust between security agencies and the public. The impact of this extortion spree on travellers cannot be overstated.

‘’One, it creates a culture of fear and mistrust, where citizens view security operatives as predators rather than protectors. It also imposes a significant financial burden on travellers, many of whom are already struggling to make ends meet.

Undermining legitimacy

“Furthermore, this extortion racket undermines the legitimacy of Nigeria’s security agencies and erodes public confidence in their ability to maintain law and order. It also perpetuates a broader culture of corruption where public officers feel emboldened to exploit their positions for personal gain.

‘’As the Yuletide season approaches, it is imperative that the issue of extortion and harassment at checkpoints on Nigerian highways is addressed urgently. With many Nigerians set to embark on journeys to various parts of the country, the last thing they need is to be bogged down by multiple checkpoints that can cause traffic congestion, delay travellers, and increase their vulnerability to robbery and other criminal activities.”

Urgent steps by authorities needed

An auto dealer in Lagos, Chief Anslem Ikedigwe, also advised that “it is crucial that the authorities took steps to streamline the checkpoint system, ensure that security personnel are properly trained and supervised, and implement measures to prevent extortion and harassment, in order to guarantee a safe and hassle-free travel experience for all.”

To address this issue, a traveller, Mr Akpan Ete, who returned from Akwa- Ibom State last Wednesday, said: “There is need for greater accountability and oversight. Also, the introduction of technology such as arms detectors could greatly enhance the effectiveness of the checkpoints, making it easier to identify and apprehend criminals, while minimizing the inconvenience to law-abiding citizens”.

Another driver of a popular transport company, Ike Okwute, who blamed the various checkpoints for the delay in reaching his destination, said: “ The solution to this menace is, first, the federal government must take decisive action to address the root causes of corruption within Nigeria’s security agencies.

‘’This includes providing adequate training, equipment, and incentives for personnel, as well as establishing robust mechanisms for accountability and oversight.

“Secondly, the government should establish a network of CCTV cameras and monitoring systems to track the activities of security operatives at checkpoints. This would help to deter extortion and provide evidence for prosecution in cases where it occurs.

‘’Thirdly, citizens must be empowered to report cases of extortion and corruption. This can be achieved through the establishment of a dedicated hotline or online platform, where citizens can submit complaints and evidence.”
Another transporter who simply gave his name as Uche, said: “Security operatives who engage in extortion and corruption must be held accountable. This includes prosecuting and punishing those found guilty, as well as providing support and protection for whistleblowers that come forward to report wrongdoing.

‘’Mind you, there are also local government officials who stop vehicles on the highway, particularly in Ondo and Edo states. They are vicious and uncouth. They will clamp one’s vehicle and tow it to God knows where, if the driver refuses to part with as much as N20, 000.This set of people should be called to order.”

A commuter, Osagie Ehinome, who spoke with Vanguard on the issue, said: “As I reflect on the experiences I had endured during my journey to Edo State, I couldn’t help but feel a sense of outrage and disappointment.

‘’Nigeria’s highways should be safe and secure, not a hunting ground for corrupt security operatives. It’s time for the government to take decisive action to address this menace and restore the trust and confidence of citizens in Nigeria’s security agencies.”

Police, reflection of rotten political class — Activist, Effiong

Also reacting to the development, lawyer and human rights activist, Inibehe Effiong, on his X handle, said: ‘’It is only in a lawless and criminal state that the police, an institution meant to protect lives and properties, would kill, steal and constantly harass and molest citizens.

‘’The police is exactly the way the rotten and corrupt political class wants it to be. If you expect corrupt politicians to reform the police, you’re going to wait till eternity.

‘’Nigerian institutions will not be reformed until we have the right people in power. I don’t see a way out. But we will keep fighting.’’

We didn’t send out our men to make money — Force Headquarters

Reacting yesterday, Police High Command said state governors were aware
of the roadblocks mounted by its personnel either on major highways or some intercity roads in their respective locations.

It also said Nigerians abroad were trooping into the country to enjoy Christmas in their respective communities, sequel to improved security situation in every nook and cranny of the country.

Spokesman of the force, Olumuyiwa Adejobi, an Assistant Commissioner of Police, stated this while fielding questions from journalists during a joint press briefing of all spokesmen of all security agencies held at the Office of the National Security Adviser, Abuja.

The briefing, organised by the Strategic Communications Interagency Policy Committee, SCIPC, of the ONSA, led by the Director of Legal Services, Zakari Mijinyawa, had representatives of military, fire service, FRSC, among others in attendance.

Reacting to fears of some people over kidnapping incidents on major highways, particularly in the South East, Adejobi said the force had deployed to major highways in order to forestall any of such occurrence.

“Let me say we have done strategic deployment, and our deployment across the country is not to intimidate anybody, it is for us to make sure that all our routes, major highways and communities are safe.

“Let me clarify that we don’t have roadblocks in Nigeria, we have stop-and-search points, nipping points, and others. Where you see roadblocks, that is zigzag movement – be it log of wood, drums and everything, must have been at the request of the governor of that state.

“No command will form any roadblocks without the consent of the governor of that state. There are some states where the governors have actually requested or sought permission of the IGP to have such roadblocks,” he said.

The force spokesman said senior officers in the police had never sent any officer on patrol to make money for them, saying Nigerians should report such officers via publicised headlines if caught while misbehaving.

He added: “Generally, across the country, we have stop-and-search points, and we’ll continue to have such stop-and-search points for now until we have a better system, where we will not have men stopping vehicles and checking your papers, where we have authorised patrol when cameras will be monitoring our highways.

“But now, for our good, and the good of our people, plying all these routes. Where we have issues with the men at these various points, we have rolled out our helplines. We have rolled out our complaint response platforms and numbers. Let us make use of them.

“I’ve not seen any senior man from any agency, particularly in the police, that will rubbish his name in the name of money. Apart from Customs that is for revenue, I’ve not seen any that will say go and raise N10 million for me as you’re going to your point of duty, I’ve not seen it,” he said.

He urged citizens to cooperate with the Police at every point and leverage on the various complaints platform, such as the complaint response unit, CRU, Public Complaints Bureau, PCB, to report acts of misconduct by officers deployed at various locations across the country.’’

Adejobi also advised the public to call 09133333785,09133333786,07056792065 for complaints against police actions on the highway, as well as reach out on [email protected].

Vanguard

The domination of the judiciary of Nigerian states by state governors


By Douglas Ogbankwa, Esq.

The Nigerian state stands on a tripod of the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary which powers of each organ of government is properly delineated in Sections 4,5 and 6 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (As Amended )

Sadly, of the three arms of government, the Judiciary is both financially and administratively emasculated by the Governors who see the Judiciary albeit wrongly as a parastatal under their Government Houses.

In most states of the federation, the Judiciary goes cap in hand to the Government Houses through their Chief Registrars, waiting to get the Governors to approve funds for the same Judges they have cases in their Courts! What a misnomer and an anathema of a gargantuan proportion!

The Governors control the purse and the sword in Nigeria. In a country like ours where the Governors act as emperors running the state as personal empires the Judiciary is the only organ that moderates the excesses of the Governors.

Aware of these facts indicated above, all the 36 States’ Governors in Nigeria have desecrated the same Constitution they swore to protect, which in saner clime is an impeachable offence.
Section 121 (3) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (As Amended) is clear and unambiguous to the effect that All Monies standing to the credit of the Judiciary shall be paid directly to the Heads of Court.

Why is it difficult for Governors to obey this Section of the Constitution, but obey others that favour them? The reasons are not far-fetched.

Many of these Governors have skeletons in their cupboards and allowing the Judiciary to be financially independent is like handing over to the hangman a noose and a hood to execute you. The Governors know that once the Judiciary is independent, the blatant impunity with which they run the states in this era of the preponderance of Freedom of Information will be over.

I wish to tell the Government and their collaborators, some of whom are very senior lawyers, that the independence of the Judiciary is nigh and it shall happen quicker than they think.

The bar at the national and local levels needs to do something to protect the Judges from the perfidious invasion of the Judiciary by the Governors which is borne out of selfishness and in some cases outright callousness.

But the Judges have to do more to protect themselves. It is time for the setting up of an Association of Nigerian Judges as a pressure group to wade off the improper annexation of the Judiciary by the Governors.

The other day, a Governor sent vehicles to the Judiciary in a State in Nigeria and he attached the names of Judges to each of the vehicles.

What is the business of a Governor to purchase vehicles for the same Judges you have cases in their courts, some of which are even election related matters?

The Executive choose their SSG, Chief of Staff and Commissioners, the Legislature choose their Speaker and other principal officers, why should the Governors be choosing our Judges?

Some leaders of the bar have failed in this regard, in stopping the Executive from meddling in the appointment of Judges. Others are doing too little and most times too late to protect the Judiciary.

The relationship between the Judiciary and the bar is akin to those of the hen and the chick and Judiciary can not speak for itself, the Bar is there to protect the Judiciary against external aggression as now being dastardly perpetuated by the Governors.

When I was younger, you were called upon to serve in the Judiciary, judging from your track records in practice or in the lower Bench.

Now the lobbying to be a Judge with a Governor of the State makes you ask the question whether you are appointing a Judge for the Judiciary or a Judge for the Governor. How can a Judge that is so politically exposed in his appointment process do justice in this highly politically charged environment called Nigeria?

Some of our Bar Leaders are quiet to all these shenanigans which suggest that they are either cowards or accomplices.

We, as Lawyers, have no other profession. We can not allow a few people to control the Judiciary the way a puppeteer controls a puppet Budgeting is governance, he who feeds you, controls you and he who pays the piper controls the tune.

We have no reason to complain about obnoxious judgments when we are quiet in the face of obnoxious appointment processes for Judges. You can not sow cocoyam and reap yam.

The legal profession is modelled to protect the weak and moderate the strong. The Judiciary should also be quick to assert itself when cases challenging the illegalities of the Governors on any issue are brought before it.

The Judiciary most times panders to the whims and caprices of these Governors which further emboldens them to do more wrong without any fear of reprimand. We have had a few courageous Judges, but they have also paid the price when their retirement benefits are wickedly withheld by the Governors who now run the States as thin gods, forgetting they will leave power one day!

Justice Adolphous Karibe-Whyte (Justice of the Supreme Court, as he then was ) stated in the case of AG Federation v Guardian Newspapers LTD (1999) 9 NWLR Part 618 @ 87, if I may paraphrase, that in the face of tyranny, the Judiciary must rise up against the excesses of the Executive else the state will be subsumed to the dictatorship of one man.

Chief Gani Fawehinmin SAN of blessed memory captured aptly the place of Bar and Bench in the society when he unassailably stated that:

“The Legal Profession ought to be and must strive to remain the dependable bastion of hope, help and succour for the repressed, the oppressed and the suppressed in our society.”

About the Author:
Douglas Ogbankwa Esq.@[email protected] is the Convener of Vanguard for the Independence of the Judiciary

Between Dele Farotimi, Yayaha Bello, and Betta Edu

By Richard Odusanya.

Living life in our beloved country, Nigeria is unfortunately becoming harder by the day, no thanks to the prevailing and dire circumstances, which include corruption, profligacy, recklessness and the harsh economic realities.

The examples of the recent revelations about Dele Farotimi (DF), Yahaya Bello, and Betta Edu are clear evidence that Nigeria has more problems with corruption and abuse of office than we realise and admit. And that ignorance or pretence is even more crippling than the corruption that we all worry about.

Put succinctly, our outer world mirrors our inside world, and we often find the truth too unpleasant to deal with. Suffice it to say that lawlessness and excesses are what make Nigeria poor and intolerable. We cannot eat our cake and have it; as a people, we desire democracy, rule of law, and human rights. What is happening right now is a consequence of our copy-and-paste doctrine! I am not in the least surprised. This would not happen in China, Singapore, Korea, Taiwan, etc., because their laws are made in accordance with their doctrines, cultures, and traditions and they have strong institutions that ensure that laws apply to all and sundry irrespective of class or position. 

They don’t give a damn about any ‘Western values’ or views. For example, someone like Yahaya Bello would know that he would pay for what he did with his life in China; no debate and 99% of their people would support it!

The contrasting images couldn’t be more telling. On one hand, Dele Farotimi, a fiery activist and vocal advocate for justice, is seen in handcuffs, a symbol of a system that seeks to punish dissent more swiftly than it addresses corruption. On the other hand, Yahaya Bello, the controversial governor of Kogi State, walks freely, exuding an air of invincibility despite numerous allegations of financial mismanagement and political excesses.

To build a little context, I crave the indulgence of our esteemed readers to reproduce a short post that I did about the man of the moment, ‘DF’: A man with nothing to lose, especially if he ‘has already lost everything’ and is ready to face the consequences of his actions, is the most dangerous to fight. You can see this in Edmond Dantes from “The Count of Monte Cristo.” In my opinion, the man who has nothing to lose is more dangerous, because the man who has everything to lose will not exist. In general, I’d say the man that has nothing to lose has the edge—but it’s all dependent on circumstance and the people themselves.

As for Betta Edu, who was the former minister of humanitarian affairs, disaster management, and social development ministry (the ministry has since been aptly dubbed ‘Disaster Ministry’ by Nigerians. No thanks to incessant cases of embezzlement that have bedeviled it since it’s creation) until her suspension in January and her official sack recently. Word on the street is that Betta corralled a whopping sum of more than N585m ($640,000; £500,000) of public money meant for the poor into a personal bank account of another government apparatchik.

Back to our society, more of this would happen until we realise that we are not Americans, Europeans, or Asians and start the process of establishing laws that serve us. We must reconsider! As a result, the driving force behind the lawlessness of Nigerians is poverty (for robberies and scams especially) and, in general, the state of the country—the corruption and lack of law and order. The same could happen anywhere (and it does anyway).

My position is very simple: we cannot change Nigeria by adopting western methodologies. The best oncologist is not the best malaria doctor, and neither can the best cancer medicine treat the mildest yellow fever! For the purpose of emphasis, I have studied our people; they have unique characteristics in the majority, and we cannot assume that what people like us debate or write is what would sway them towards change. 

Furthermore, the elites’ recklessness is based on their ability to manipulate this massive population that we are not reaching. To get them to act on our side for change, we must develop methods of getting to them, persuading them, and triggering action from them. This would not be an easy task in my opinion.

In conclusion, I’d like to use the golden words of Barack Hussein Obama, an American lawyer and politician who served as the 44th president of the United States from 2009 to 2017. Obama once said Africa should strive for strong institutions rather than strong men.

Finally, I wish all Nigerians well; both Dele Farotimi and Aare Afe Babalola deserve our sympathy and victory in justice as we search for a better country and seek to build a golden monument from the ruins of yesteryears and the anguish of today.

BEST WISHES OF THE SEASON TO ALL OUR COMPATRIOTS.

Richard Odusanya

[email protected]

VACANCY: Lawyers, Psychologists, Clinical Counselors, Behavioural Therapists

LOCATION: KADUNA, ABUJA.

A. JOB TYPE: Full Time, Pupillage, ( Lawyer- corps members), Psychologists, Clinical Counselors, Behavioural Therapists.

Vacancy is open for Lawyers, Psychologists, Clinical Counselors, Behavioural Therapists in Kaduna or Abuja.

B. OVERALL REQUIRED EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS:

Character, Competence & Productivity.

Passionate about Justice

LLB, BL not less than 3 years of litigation experience.

An advanced Degree and a history of productivity are added advantages.

Excellent cross-disciplinary research skills, writing and communication skills.

Ability to work independently and as part of a team.

Pupil Lawyers (i.e. lawyers in the NYSC scheme) must be called to the Nigerian Bar as at the time of application.

C. JOB DESCRIPTIONS: LAWYERS.

We are looking for experienced lawyers to join our team. The ideal candidates should have strong background in litigation and advocacy, experience or research interests in any of the following areas: Medical Law, Civil Law, Criminal Law, Mass Atrocities Accountability, Fashion Law, Entertainment Law, Crime Prevention, Media Law.

D. RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES:
Provide legal representation to clients in trial and appellate courts, tribunals and Alternative Dispute Resolution forums.
Scheduling and managing client interviews. Taking preliminary statements from witnesses & reviewing documents.
Conduct in-depth legal research on legal issues, criminal cases, case law statutes and precedents and draft legal documents. Provide legal advice to clients. Supervise and mentor junior lawyers, interns, externs and ancillary legal duties.

E. PUPIL LAWYER:
Corps member Lawyers.
We are looking for pupil lawyers to join our team during their service year. The ideal candidates shall be passionate about justice, highly motivated and enthusiastic.

F. PSYCHOLOGISTS, BEHAVIOURAL THERAPISTS, CLINICAL COUNSELORS.

LOCATION: KADUNA.

Competence Requirements:

-Experienced, Empathetic, Supportive and Non-judgemental.

  • Dedication to healing
  • Emotional intelligence and innovation
  • Critical thinking
  • Active listening and Communication
  • Observant and Open to feedback
  • Emotional maturity & psycho-social skills development
  • Advanced Degree and history of productivity is added advantage.

D. SALARY & REMUNERATION

Salary is negotiable. Career growth opportunities with increase in remuneration based on performance is guaranteed. Upon confirmation, there shall be paid annual leave, paid maternity leave, travel & health allowance and housing allowance as due. Lawyers shall in addition, have robe allowance.

E. APPLICATION PROCEDURE.

i. Application Letter.

ii. Personal Statement

iii. Well structured Current, Comprehensive Curriculum Vitae in English including place of residence and contact details of at least three (3) referees, one of which must be from last place of assignment.

Prospective candidates shall submit all requirements via email to:

[email protected]

CC: [email protected]

DEADLINE OF APPLICATION:

20 December, 2024

NEXT APPLICATION SEASON: Due to the evolving nature and expansion of the organisation, qualified candidates who miss the 20 December 2024 timeline could send in their applications which may be considered when new vacancies are available. https://houseofjusticeng.com/

TIPS