Home Blog Page 4

Thou judge -basher, can you look in the mirror pls?

Anonymous


We are all so good at Judge-bashing as if we are all saints. How many here have not at one time or the other contributed to the rot that we are gleefully complaining about endlessly? Talk is cheap, especially when at the expense of others. The Judiciary is not smelling of roses just like every other segment of our society, admitted. We are all guilty, but because scapegoating is convenient, we sit in the comfort of our various homes and point accusing fingers at people who can’t answer back.

This is not by any means a defence of judicial officers. It is to make the point that the hypocrisy is even more nauseating than the crime alleged. Judges are lame ducks, so they are easy scapegoats for you. Have you checked yourself in the mirror? It is easy to forget the sacrifices that our judges make daily and the agonies they go through, many under terrible conditions in the remotest parts of this nation, to keep the ship of the country afloat. By all means, criticize them when necessary. But, can you pls first search yourself and honestly vouch that you have not, one time or the other in your over 40 years career, contributed knowingly or otherwise, to what you accuse others of?

How many of you have had golden opportunities to come to the bench and make a difference but refused because you preferred an easier life? Truly, the judiciary, as other sectors of our existence as a nation, needs rebirth. No question. And judges are the first to admit so. But what are you yourself doing to contribute to that rebirth apart from just enjoying the sadistic fervor of bashing judges on this platform?

Some of you are politicians, and you know in your hearts the sins you have committed to judicial rot. You think God is happy with you for your secret sins and open display of Puritanism? Some of you in business know what you have done in your organizations in your desperate moments to compromise the judiciary. Prove me wrong, Oga. Your conscience is judging you, right?

How many times have you sought one favor or the other from a judge friend? You think that is not part of it, abi? Ok. Your conscience will judge you, not me. How Many of you who have invited your judge friends to your children’s weddings or your concubine’s child naming have been careful to host your judge guests in an inner room instead of serving them food and wine in the open? Will you pls first remove the log in your own eyes pls?


Can we do with this annoying hypocrisy and admit our faults and join hands while we still can, to do what is right, howsoever small in our small corners to make the system better? Those of you who are professors, what are you doing in secret with our daughters? You think you are ok, Abi? Blessed indeed are those whose sins are covered
Oga head of chambers, can your juniors vouch for your integrity?
Let every man be a liar, and God alone true!

Response by one who would not want to be named.

Milord, bless you. But I hope this is not a direct response to my earlier post on the lowering of the standard of judicial officers specifically and generally. Milord has spoken well for both sides, though with a tilt to make those bold enough to say all is not well guilty.

Trust me, we check the mirrors regularly! All is not well with the bar largely and the bench to some extent. Outspoken judges and lawyers who sometimes act as defenders and watchdogs must endure the criticism that their self-appointed mission entails. We owe that to posterity and our conscience. Must we keep quiet? I say No! As a lawyer and watchdog, I can speak with humility and a bit of authority.

I surmise that there is an acknowledgement of the lowering of standards by most observers. I speak because I’ve had close family members as judges, even as heads of court. Spouse was in the business of judging others, too. Some retired or died. I even had the privilege of being in JSC at the state level. With that as the background, I must humbly agree with Milord that, yes, while we must first remove the spec in our own eyes as we check the mirrors, we can’t close our eyes to the logs we see daily in the eyes of those society holds to a higher bar.

They shoulder a more onerous burden because of their powers of life and death. They are supposed to be better than us. They are next to God. They can and indeed should earn our utmost respect, and they often do. To whom much is given in terms of power and authority, much is expected. Lawyers are less regulated than our judex. The bulk of the acts of omission and commission committed by lawyers are made permissible by what Milord referred to in his post.

Why do we allow them to get away with blue murder? Where is the courage to sanction or render disapproval in our decisions? I hate to talk of myself, but I can modestly make bold to say I have not influenced anyone, be it classmates, friends, or family levels to do wrong. I will not even bring it up. When it became tedious to realise my financial dream in the profession without doing “man no man,” I activated my innate business talents to thrive financially. Even then, I remain committed to the bar in ways many could not.

Where does all this lead us? Reform, reform, reform!! We either reform or die! My uncle is close to 90 now. After more than 25 years on the bench and a lifetime of service as state counsel, DPP, etc, he had to retire to his father’s house. When it was his turn to be a CJ, the military imported someone from another state to take over, even though the constitution says a judge from the State following seniority in that state ought to be in line! There’re many internal and external defects that brouggt the justice sector to where we are now. There are outstanding judex who suffered daily under excruciating conditions. I should know.

My uncle lives in the house left for him by his late father, completely blind. We continue to help. Yes, things are not right in many respects, but it’s not all who want change and seek a return to the glorious days who have specs in their eyes. We talk because we want a better society where the judiciary is truly the last hope of citizens of this country that we all love. There is sordid stuff that I have witnessed in my 70 years on earth pertaining to the rot in the system.

If those of us who are part of the justice system can’t and won’t talk, and our judex can’t talk, who then will talk? That is my worry. By all means, we commend, applaud, and continue to support our friends on the bench without fear or favour. We don’t just talk. We act, too, to the glory of God and the betterment of this profession we love. We will continue to ask that the logs be reduced to a manageable level whenever we observe any. The glory of the administration of justice that compares to best in the world is what we all deserve, for the good of our beautiful homeland.

A Comprehensive Review of “Counted Out”: A powerful documentary on how math shapes opportunity and our daily lives


Film produced by Vicki Abeles (Counted Out)

Math is power.

A world where technology, data, and algorithms dictate almost every aspect of our lives, the new documentary Counted Out makes a compelling case for why math literacy is not just an academic subject but a critical civil rights issue. Premiering at the Cleveland International Film Festival on April 7 and the San Francisco International Film Festival on April 28, this film is set to spark nationwide conversations about the power of numbers in shaping our democracy, economy, and future opportunities.

Why Math Matters More Than Ever

Many people think of math as a school subject, something to be passed and forgotten after graduation. But Counted Out shatters this notion by revealing how math influences our everyday decisions. From the news we consume to the jobs we qualify for, from the effectiveness of our votes to the fairness of the justice system, an invisible layer of mathematics dictates who holds power and who gets left behind.

This film challenges us to ask:

Why do so many students fear math?
Why does math proficiency decline as children grow up?
What happens when only a few people truly understand the mathematical systems governing society?
Through real-life stories, expert insights, and thought-provoking analysis, Counted Out urges us to rethink our relationship with math, not as an intimidating subject, but as a vital tool for empowerment.

A Wake-Up Call for Parents and Educators

For parents, this documentary is a must-watch because it sheds light on how early a child’s confidence in math can shape their future. Many children decide they are “not math people” from a young age, often due to how the subject is taught or how they perceive their own abilities. But what if we changed that narrative?

Bob Moses, the civil rights leader whose legacy is honored in this film, believed that math access is a fundamental right. His Algebra Project aimed to equip marginalized students with the math skills they need to succeed in a technology-driven world. The documentary highlights the impact of his work and makes a powerful argument for why math education should be accessible and engaging for all children, regardless of their background.

As parents, we can take away valuable lessons from this film:

Encourage a positive attitude toward math at home.
Show children how math connects to real life, whether through budgeting, technology, or even social media algorithms.
Advocate for better math education in schools.
Why Children Should Watch Too

For young viewers, Counted Out makes math feel less like a classroom burden and more like a superpower. It demonstrates how understanding numbers can lead to exciting careers in engineering, medicine, technology, and even media. More importantly, it shows that math is not just about numbers, rather it’s about thinking critically, solving problems, and understanding the world in a deeper way.

Conclusion

Counted Out calls on all of us to recognize that math is not just for the elite or the exceptionally gifted; it’s for everyone. Whether you are a parent wanting the best for your child, a student seeking inspiration, or an educator looking to reform teaching methods, this film offers a powerful and urgent message: Math literacy is essential for social and economic equality.

A Defence For Hon. Justice Akomaye Agim, JSC

By Ikeazor Ajovi Akaraiwe, SAN

Hon. Justice Agim acquitted himself (and Nigeria) honourably as Chief Justice of our West African neighbours, The Gambia, and Justice of the Supreme Court of our Southern African neighbours, Swaziland. He was also a Professor of law at, University of The Gambia and a Lecturer at the Gambia Law School.

His tenure as Chief Justice of The Gambia is yet unparalleled in the history of that country. Military Dictator Yaya Jammeh came to have a grudging admiration for his fearlessness in giving nuanced judgments against his administration.

His Chief Justiceship brought honour to Nigeria. Upon his return to Nigeria, he was appointed to the bench of the Court of Appeal and sent to Enugu. That was where we came into contact with his scholarship, his intellectual rigour, philosophical disposition and moral excellence.

Indeed, since his elevation to the bench of the Supreme Court of Nigeria, it is unarguable that if there is only one legal philosopher at the Supreme Court, it is Agim; if there are two, Agim is one of them; and if there are three, Agim is certainly one of the three. He stands distinguished. While you may not always agree with all his judgments, if you took the trouble to read them, you will certainly appreciate his philosophical, moral and legal bent. Even if you do not agree, and it is impossible to always agree.

About the unfortunate photographs which came out of the 50th anniversary convocation of the University of Calabar, there are lessons to be learned. I am not saying that this is what happened in the case under reference, but this is political season and it is not impossible that politicians can even manipulate sitting arrangements at public events to place them strategically and proceed to ensure that the press takes such strategic photos. I repeat, I am not saying that this is what happened in the example under reference.

Thus, the Supreme Court must have a protocol team for all its justices, if it does not already have one, which should be notified of ceremonial movements of Supreme Court Justices. Secondly, the protocol team will ensure that the sort of seating arrangement that saw Hon. Justice Agim placed next to a politically exposed litigant at the University of Calabar convocation ceremonies never happens again.

As the argument rages at the bar about the advisability of judges receiving awards from institutions who may one day appear before them, it is important that learned justices of learning and character like Agim JSC are neither discouraged nor vilified except where they deserve it.

Agim’s philosophical underpinnings may be located in the lecture he delivered as keynote speaker, Law Week, NBA Ogoja branch – ROLE OF THE LAWYER IN STOPPING IMPUNITY FOR GOVERNMENT OFFICE CORRUPTION, DISMANTLING KLEPTOCRACY AND PROMOTING GENUINE DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE, when he was still a Justice of the Court of Appeal. I happened to be a speaker also at that law week. That lecture is reproduced as an addendum to this piece.

Ikeazor Ajovi Akaraiwe, SAN
1st Vice-President, NBA (2008-2010); and Chair, NBA Human Rights Institute (2008-2010).

Addendum
Lecture by Hon Justice Emmanuel Akomaye Agim JCA (as he then was) at the Law Week of NBA Ogoja Branch –
ROLE OF THE LAWYER IN STOPPING IMPUNITY FOR GOVERNMENT OFFICE CORRUPTION, DISMANTLING KLEPTOCRACY AND PROMOTING GENUINE DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE

ROLE-OF-THE-LAWYER-IN-STOPPING-IMPUNITY-FOR-GOVERNMENT-OFFICE-CORRUPTION-DISMANTLING-KLEPTOCRACY-AND-PROMOTING-GENUINE-DEMOCRATIC-GOVERNANCE1

A ‘spy’ on Fubara

By Suyi Ayodele

A sad event occurred in Uromi, Edo State last week. Some travellers described as “travelling hunters from the North” were murdered by some felons on the suspicion that the deceased were kidnappers. The whole nation rose to condemn the act.

President Bola Tinubu joined in the condemnation. He said that Nigeria had no room for jungle justice. I laughed. What did President Tinubu do in Rivers State penultimate week? What is his definition of “jungle justice’? Simple dictionary definition of ‘jungle justice’ says “is a form of public extrajudicial killings which can be found in Nigeria, Cameroon, and Bangladesh…”

When President Tinubu summarily executed democracy in Rivers State by sacking the democratically elected governor of the state alongside the entire state legislative arm against the tenets, spirits and letters of the nation’s constitution, what did he call that? What is more jungle justice than that crass decapitation of the Rivers State democratic set-up?

The Abuja scriptwriters on Governor Siminalayi Fubara of Rivers State are bad students of drama. My sense of modesty would not allow me to call them illiterate playwrights. But that is exactly what my mind tells me they are!

Nigerians are in for an episodic plot of nonsensical drama. The Abuja buccaneers that are after the blood of Fubara and the political gains of Rivers State in 2027 would stop at nothing. They need everything they can lay their hands on to justify the absurdity of a state of emergency in the oil-rich state. The bad script was written a long time ago. The execution is well-planned out.

The sack of Fubara is an event that will hunt and hurt this administration for a long time to come or until another perfidy unfolds. The dramas unfolding from that state will continue for a long time as the bad scripts keep hitting us. Unfortunately, Abuja is both deaf and dumb, intentionally! Former President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan said it all. Abuja is pretending to be asleep. Waking it up to smell the coffee of its missteps in Rivers State is an impossible task!

A Nigerian multi-billionaire once quipped: “Gentlemen, I am not as stupid as I look.” The man of wealth uttered the words to show his close top aides that he could see through their schemes. The old man, a lexicographer in his own corner, needed to let those around him know that it is not every time they tell him ‘Mr. Chairman is always right’, that he believes them!

Nigerians should borrow those words and tell the Abuja dramatists that ‘We (Nigerians) are not as stupid’ as the Abuja hawks want us to look or be! The latest drama on Governor Fubara and his alleged open plan to commit arson and compromise the security of his state as ‘dramatised’ by the ex-Head of Service (HoS) of Rivers State, Dr. George Nwaeke, is one episode that is not adding up to the entire drama of the absurd! The thriller writer James Hadley Chase once penned Believe this, you’ll believe anything.’ That appropriately situates Nwaeke’s drama in Abuja last Friday.

Fixing spies in the enemy’s camp is the pastime of all warriors. It is a tact, a practice, that is as old as the concept of intrigue itself. British foremost Prime Minister, Sir Winston Churchill, while giving the account of the defeat of the Germans in World War II says: “At this time, we had a spy in close touch with Rommel’s headquarters, who gave us accurate information…” (The second World War, Volume III, chapter XIX, page1).

Johannes Erwin Eugen Rommel (November 15, 1891 –October 14, 1944) was a German hero of World War I, with the appellation, The Desert Fox. Rommel served in the World War II as the commander of the German 7th Panzer Division, which led the 1940 invasion of France. Despite his avowed dexterity, he harboured, unknowingly, among his rank and file, a spy for the British Army. The information supplied by the spy accounted for the defeat of the Germans in 1945.

I lifted the above quote from Robert Vacha’s thriller, “A Spy for Churchill” (January 1, 1974). Born Dorab Robert Vacha on January 15, 1918, Vacha served as District Officer (D.O.) in the British Colonial Administration in Nigeria between 1950 to 1957. He was a Lieutenant Colonel in the British Army and participated in World War II. “A Spy for Churchill” is one of the most accurate accounts of how the German Army was defeated in World War II.

Without an insider giving the other forces, especially the British Army, accurate information, it would have been very difficult to defeat the Germans. The Germans themselves acknowledged the existence of a spy in their Army. One authority on the German Army’s operations, Henri Nannen Verlag, puts the incident in its proper perspective when he wrote thus:

“The reports of experts on Rommel’s staff show that an intelligent enemy Secret Service had plenty of opportunity to acquire valuable information. One man in the chain along which Rommel’s plan was passed was in the pay of the enemy. Who was it? this last question remains to be answered.” (Die Wilstenfuche, 1958, page 70).

Was Dr George Nwaeke a spy on Governor Fubara? If he was, for how long? Nwaeke was in Abuja on Friday last week, where he held a one-man ‘press conference’, and like a witch in the village square, he ‘revealed’ the ‘secrets’ he shared with Fubara and some top aides on the crisis in Rivers State.

As I watched the video of the ‘press conference’, my mind raced to the video of a similar event in Edo State in 2001. The video was about the then State Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Elder Bayo Ogbomo’s alleged resignation. Copies of the ‘resignation’ letter were sent to state correspondents. God bless the then Chairman of the Correspondents Chapel, Tony Osauzo of the Concord Newspapers. He insisted that we would not file the report until we spoke to Ogbomo.

Due to our insistence, a video of where Elder Ogbomo ‘resigned’ was shown to us. In the video was Ogbomo, but many things were wrong. One, the old man looked ruffled. Two, the office, where he made the recording appeared to be an uncompleted building. Again, in the video, Ogbomo could be seen driving away some flying insects as he read the script.

We later discovered that Ogbomo was kidnapped at Five Junction, Benin City, State Secretariat of the PDP, and was taken to an uncompleted building at the Gapiona axis of the Benin G.R.A., where he was forced to read the prepared text of his resignation. Hours later after he regained his freedom, Ogbomo issued a rebuttal, stating that he was forced at gunpoint to resign. He emphasised that he remained the PDP Secretary in the state!

That was the exact picture I got as Nwaeke read his press statement in Abuja. But he went ahead to state that he was physically present when “…Governor Siminalayi Fubara directed his Chief of Staff (Edison Ehie) to burn down the Assembly to avert his impeachment. That evening, Edison was in Government House with two other boys, including the former Chairman of Obio/Akpor LGA, one Chijioke.

He continued: “I was there with them when a bag of money was handed over to Edison for that operation, though I do not know the amount inside. I want to tell the people of Rivers State today that the House of Assembly Complex on Moscow Road was deliberately brought down by Edison Ehie under the instructions of Governor Siminalayi Fubara. I challenge him to an open confrontation, and I will provide more details.”

After listening to the above, one may be tempted to ask: Is Governor Fubara ‘as stupid as he looks?’ Who was Nwaeke in the Fubara’s cabinet that the governor would trust him so much to openly discuss an arson of such a magnitude with him? How on earth would a governor invite a civil servant to witness where the plan to burn down a government establishment was being hatched?

And if we must take Nwaeke by his words, whom did he discuss the plan with after leaving the meeting? Is the ex-HoS saying that he is such a secretive individual that he did not mention the plan he witnessed to any living object? Should that be the case, is he aware of the legalese: “accessory after the fact of crime (arson)? Is it not a criminal offence that the ex-HoS did not alert the security agencies about the plan? Why is the law dormant this time?

I don’t want to hold the brief of Fubara in this matter. Much so, I am equally aware that one of the persons Nwaeke named in the plan, Edison Ehie, the Chief of Staff to Fubara, has approached the court for redress. But I must confess that Nwaeke’s ‘confession’ is something that is too difficult for me to believe. The timing, the composure, the venue (hotel room), everything, all point to a badly written script by amateur playwrights! It is all about looking for justification for the error of a state of emergency in Rivers State!

If anybody has put a lie to the Abuja badly scripted drama, it is Florence Nwaeke, the wife of the ex-HoS of Rivers State. Like most rational Nigerians, Florence does not share the narrative of her husband. I have been asking who the closest person to Nwaeke should be than his wife. But the woman knows that her husband’s trip to Abuja was an imposed one. This was in addition to revealing that her husband was forced to resign from the service of the state.

Should we believe Mrs. Nwaeke? You can decide that after hearing her speak: “When he (Nwaeke) got to Abuja, he called that he had landed. I said, ‘Thank God. The next thing I saw this night, people were calling me and said he got an interview. I said, what interview? Interview for what? Not until I saw things flying on the internet that he granted an interview. What happened? I said, that is not my husband. That is not my husband. So, I sent him a message. I said, ‘Are you under duress?’ I sent him a message. I said, ‘Have they kidnapped you? Talk to me now. Why are you not talking to me?’ This is the message I sent to him when I saw his interview online.” What type of husband receives this type of message from his wife and will choose to keep silent?

The final expose of the Abuja deal is Nwaeke’s closing remarks, where he defended President Tinubu and thanked him and the Godswill Akpabio-led moribund National Assembly. Hear him again: “This accounts for the organised media condemnations and seeming public outcry against Mr. President and National Assembly. Those who love democracy and humanity will always protect humanity and democracy. Mr. President, you have just protected democracy and humanity in Rivers State. I can now sleep with my conscience clear.”

I was tempted here to ask, like Eyo Charles, the Daily Trust reporter in Calabar, Cross River State, once asked Femi Fani-Kayode, at a press conference thus: “Who bankrolled these trips?” I stated last week that the flight to the 2027 general election “promised bad weather”, and cautioned everyone to “fasten your seat belt, turbulence ahead”. What happened in Abuja last week is one of the turbulences ahead. Next episode, please!

Is Professor Chidi Odinkalu truly degrading the legal profession? —Akaraiwe, SAN

  • As SERAP asks President Tinubu to call Wike to order over recommendation that the legal practitioners’ disciplinary committee punish Odinkalu for degrading the profession
  • Says Wike’s call is an affront to independence of the administration of justice and rule of law

Senior Advocate of Nigeria and 1st Vice-President, NBA (2008-2010); and Chair, NBA Human Rights Institute (2008-2010), Ikeazor Ajovi Akaraiwe, SAN has condemned the recommendation that Professor Chidi Odinkalu be recommended to the legal practitioners’ disciplinary committee for degrading the profession.

Akaraiwe, in a statement sent to Law & Sciety Magazine, said:

“I read the statement attributed to Minister Nyesom Wike calling for Professor Chidi Odinkalu to be hauled before the legal practitioners’ disciplinary committee for degrading the profession.

“In a desert of cowardice, Professor Chidi Odinkalu represents an oasis of truth and courage, and if it seems that he goes overboard sometimes, can anyone deny that we are dealing with now-systemic rot, requiring radical excision?

“Those who have degraded this legal profession are those megalomaniacs, and visibly amoral persons whose corruption, bad manners, public uncouthness, and drunkenness are on display to a perplexed public who once thought that the legal profession was the personification of everything noble. Not Professor Chidi Odinkalu.

“Those who have degraded the legal profession are those who, whenever they open their mouths manage to convey the impression that they are educated illiterates, glaring advertisements of the failure of education in Nigeria, yet occupy political spaces better occupied by the more properly educated, and who act most unlawyerly in the public spaces they occupy. Not Professor Chidi Anselm Odinkalu.

“We call ourselves ‘learned friends’; glibly pontificating that ‘others are educated while we are learned’, whereas the paradox of the unlearned learned and the ignoble noble in the public space who call themselves fancy titles, from Barrister to Honourable stares the nation in the face. These are the ones degrading the legal profession. Not Professor Chidi Odinkalu.

“Finally, ‘Woe to thee, O land, when thy king is a child, and thy princes eat in the morning! Blessed art thou, O land, when thy king is the son of nobles, and thy princes eat in due season, for strength, and not for drunkenness!”’- Ecclesiastes 10/16-17.

“If anyone has degraded the legal profession, please, it is certainly not Chidi. Look yourself in the mirror and see who to haul before the disciplinary committee.”

    Similarly, the Socio-Economic Rights And Accountability Project (SERAP) has urged the FCT Minister to withdraw his call asking the Body of Bencher to recommend Odinkalu for punishment.

    SERAP, in a statement posted on its X (formerly Twitter) page, said:

    “Mr Nyesom Wike, Minister of the FCT must immediately withdraw his apparently politically motivated reported call to Nigeria’s Body of Benchers to ‘invite and discipline’ human rights lawyer Chidi Odinkalu solely for the peaceful exercise of his human rights. We urge President Tinubu to call Mr Wike to order and instruct him to end the intimidation and harassment of Mr Odinkalu simply for exercising his human rights.

    “Mr Wike’s call is an affront to the independence of the administration of justice and the rule of law. The call is illustrative of a broader pattern of harassment and intimidation of human rights defenders, activists, journalists and bloggers in the country. The Tinubu administration should ensure that all lawyers in Nigeria are able to exercise their human rights and carry out their professional duties without fear of reprisal, hindrance, intimidation or harassment.

    “The UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers imposes clear obligations on the Nigerian authorities to ensure that lawyers are able to carry out their professional functions safely and free from intimidation, improper interference, or fear of reprisals, and that they shall not suffer, or be threatened with, sanctions for actions taken in accordance with professional duties, standards, or ethics. Lawyers, like other individuals, enjoy the rights to freedom of expression, belief, association, and assembly under the Nigerian Constitution 1999 [as amended] and international human rights law, and are entitled to exercise these rights without suffering professional restrictions by reason of their lawful action.”

    Will the Real Professional Association of Lawyers, Please Stand Up? For once Wike is right-NBA is now governmentalised, time for the Nigerian Law Society (NLS) as a viable alternative

    By Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja.

    Nyesom Ezenwo Wike (NEW) is not only a lawyer, he is a Life Bencher of the Body of Benchers (BoB) of Nigeria which is the highest regulatory organ of the legal profession in Nigeria.

    On Friday 28th March 2025 he was honoured by the Chairman of the Body of Benchers (BoB) as a worthy ambassador of the Body of Benchers. A plaque was given to him to celebrate the occasion.

    During that occasion, NEW made some statements about the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA).

    In a nutshell, NEW stated the truth that the NBA over the years has become over-reliant upon funding and financial sponsorship from the State Governments for hosting of the NBA annual general conference. He stated that this is the reason why the NBA has condemned the suspension of the Rivers State Governor Fubara who previously promised to sponsor the proposed NBA annual general conference that was slated to hold in Port Harcourt in August 2025.

    NEW went further to state that in accordance with the proverb, that he who pays the Piper dictates the tune, the NBA has become hypocritical and lost both its moral and ethical authority to speak on matters of national importance because it is compromised by its habit of receipt of financial sponsorship from Any Government in power (AGIP)!!!

    Although, NEW can be faulted on his brand of politics devoid of emotions, morality and ethics, his statements about the NBA on this occasion were spot-on.

    Unwittingly, his statements about the NBA, is a confirmation that it is now time for Nigerian lawyers to turn attention to the Nigerian Law Society (NLS).

    In contrast to the NBA, since its establishment the Nigerian Law Society (NLS) in the year 2022, all its annual general conferences have been held without any form of financial sponsorship from any government (either the federal and State)!!!

    This is an opportunity for Nigerian lawyers to experience the difference by attending the 2025 annual general conference of Nigerian Law Society (NLS) which is due to hold at Ibadan, Oyo State in July 2025.

    Interested lawyers should contact the Chairman of the Conference Organising Committee, Abdulqadir Sani, Esq. He is also the Vice-President, North of the NLS. His WhatsApp number is +234 809 781 7756

    Drama in Force H/Qtrs as police detain woman over indebtedness to husband

    A legal practitioner and human rights activist, Sir Ifeanyi Ejiofor, has accused the Nigeria Police of operating outside its jurisdiction by recovering debt from a woman on the instigation of her husband.

    The incident which took place at the Police Force Headquarters in Abuja on Sunday (Mothers Day) elicited a serious drama, wild condemnation and is already causing ripples among the police hierarchy.

    “The unequivocal answer is NO. Statutory laws and numerous judicial precedents have consistently affirmed that the Nigeria Police Force (NPF) is not authorized to act as a debt recovery agency”, he said.

    Ejiofor, lawyer to the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) was reacting to the devastating account of police brutality – How monitoring unit personnel of the Nigeria Police Force Headquarters, arrested, brutalized, tortured, and detained Mrs. Joy Smart Chinenye based on a petition filed by her husband, George Obinna Smart Unaegbu, over alleged debt:

    According to him, Section 4 of the Nigeria Police Act clearly outlines the duties of the NPF, making no provision for debt recovery.

    He said, “Furthermore, superior courts have repeatedly ruled that the police cannot be used as a tool for private financial disputes. Some notable cases reinforcing this position include:
    Kure V Commissioner of Police (2020) LPELR-49378(SC). Madaki & ANOR V GTB & ANOR (2022) LPELR-57419(CA).

    “On a day globally recognized as Mothering Sunday, a mother of three found herself unjustly detained instead of celebrating motherhood. Acting on a petition from her legally married husband, personnel from the Monitoring Unit of the Nigeria Police Force Headquarters Abuja, on March 28, 2025, arrested, brutalized, tortured, and detained her over an alleged unpaid debt.

    “Her husband had allegedly given her funds for forex trading, which she was unable to repay. Rather than seek civil redress – assuming he had a valid cause of action against his wife – he enlisted the police. Officers stormed their Lagos home, forcibly arrested her in the presence of their children, and detained her at FCID Annex, Panti.

    “There, she was coerced into transferring ₦5 million to her husband’s account. When she could not commit to paying an additional ₦10 million, she was forcibly transported to Abuja and held at the notorious Abattoir detention facility, a known holding ground for hardened criminals.

    “Shockingly, in her absence, her husband relocated their children and took possession of her personal belongings.”

    The activist told journalists that it is a direct violation of Police Directives.

    He said the Nigeria Police Service Commission (NPSC) under the distinguished Chairman, DIG Hashimu Argungu (RTD) and the Inspector General of Police (IGP) have issued clear directives prohibiting officers from engaging in complaints on land disputes, arrests by proxy, debt recovery, among others.

    Ejiofor said, “Despite this, officers involved in this case blatantly disregarded these directives, prioritizing obvious private financial interests over their constitutional mandate.”

    He called on the Inspector-General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun, to order the immediate and unconditional release of Mrs. Joy Smart Chinenye; initiate a thorough investigation into this gross abuse of power; and sanction all officers involved to deter future misconduct.

    He said, “While legal action is being considered, it is imperative to bring this case to public attention to prevent further desecration of the rule of law. The Nigeria Police must not be unscrupulously used as a tool for settling private disputes – especially on a day meant to honour mothers.

    “This is particularly egregious given that the highest echelon of the Police Authority has sternly warned and prohibited its personnel from indulging in such ignoble acts that tarnish the institution’s reputation.”

    Nigerian lawyer accuses Kenya of complicity in FG’s ‘abduction’ of Nnamdi Kanu

    An Abuja-based lawyer, Christopher Chidera, has accused the Kenyan government of complicity in the Federal Government of Nigeria’s abduction and rendition of Biafra agitator Nnamdi Kanu in 2021.

    Chidera, in a statement he made available to newsmen in Abuja on Monday, alleged that the Kenyan government failed in its duty to protect Kanu in the unlawful abduction and torture of the leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra IPOB.

    He further alleged that Kenya acted in disregard for her Constitution, the Extradition Act and international treaty obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the Mutual Assistance Within the Commonwealth Act, and the London Scheme on Extradition within the Commonwealth.

    The lawyer, in a statement titled How the Government of Kenya Failed In Their Duty to Protect Nnamdi Kanu, said the incident not only jeopardized Kanu’s rights but also damaged Kenya’s reputation as a rule-of-law state within the Commonwealth and global community.

    Parts of the statement read, “The case of Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), highlights significant concerns regarding the Kenyan government’s alleged involvement in his abduction, torture, and illegal rendition to Nigeria in June 2021.

    “An outline of the role played by the Kenyan government showed its apparent disregard for the Constitution of Kenya, the Kenyan Extradition Act, and international treaty obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the Mutual Assistance Within the Commonwealth Act, and the London Scheme on Extradition within the Commonwealth.

    “Nnamdi Kanu, a dual citizen of both United Kingdom (UK) and Nigeria who entered Kenya on a UK passport, was abducted on June 19, 2021, at Jomo Kenyatta International Airport in Nairobi while picking up a friend.

    “He was seized by armed individuals, believed to be Kenyan and Nigerian security officials, without an enforceable warrant or judicial order.

    “The Constitution of Kenya (2010), under Article 29, guarantees freedom and security of the person, prohibiting arbitrary detention, torture, or inhuman treatment. Kanu’s abduction without legal justification or presentation before a court contravenes these protections.

    “The Kenyan Extradition (Commonwealth Countries) Act of 1968 mandates that extradition requests be formally processed, with the individual given an opportunity to contest the transfer in court. No such process was followed, as Kenya has denied initiating extradition proceedings, suggesting an extrajudicial operation.

    “Kanu was detained for eight days in a secret location within the perimeter of the Jomo Kenyatta International Airport in Nairobi, because he could hear the take-off and landing noise of aircrafts.

    “He was chained to the floor, beaten, and subjected to degrading treatment, including being denied access to sanitation facilities, denial of access to his medications and tortured to the point of unconsciousness.

    “Article 25 of the Kenyan Constitution explicitly prohibits torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment, rights that are non-derogable. If Kenyan officials participated in or acquiesced to such acts, this constitutes a direct violation.

    “Kenya, as a signatory to the ICCPR, is bound by Article 7, which prohibits torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment. The actions also breach Article 9, which protects against arbitrary arrest and detention, as no legal basis for Kanu’s detention was established.

    “On June 27, 2021, Kanu was forcibly handed over to Nigerian officials at the airport and flown to Abuja on a private jet, bypassing Kenyan immigration protocols and legal extradition processes.

    “This act on its own is illegal under Kenyan municipal laws.Section 6(3) of the Kenyan Extradition Act requires that extradition comply with due process, including judicial oversight and adherence to the “Doctrine of Specialty” (limiting prosecution to offenses specified in the extradition request). No extradition request from Nigeria was processed, and Kanu’s transfer lacked judicial sanction, rendering it illegal.

    “The London Scheme for Extradition within the Commonwealth, which governs extradition between Commonwealth states like United Kingdom, Kenya and Nigeria, mandates formal requests, judicial hearings, and respect for the political offense exception (Article 12). Kanu’s advocacy for Biafran secession could qualify as a political offense, potentially barring extradition. Kenya’s failure to adhere to this framework suggests a deliberate circumvention.

    “This act facilitates legal cooperation amongst Commonwealth countries (UK, Kenya and Nigeria) and does not authorize extrajudicial transfers. Kenya’s actions appear to contravene its obligations to ensure mutual assistance aligns with domestic and international law.

    “The Kenyan government, through its High Commissioner to Nigeria and other officials, has denied any role in Kanu’s arrest and rendition, claiming no records exist of his detention or extradition. This contradicts Kanu’s detailed account and evidence of his presence in Kenya (e.g., passport stamps).
    Constitutional Duty: Article 238(2) of the Kenyan Constitution subjects national security actions to the rule of law and human rights.

    “The government’s apparent acquiescence to or participation in an illegal rendition undermines this principle.

    “Beyond Articles 7 and 9, Kenya’s actions may violate Article 13, which protects against arbitrary expulsion of aliens lawfully present in a state. Kanu entered Kenya legally on a British passport, yet was expelled without due process.

    “Kenya is a party to the 1984 Convention Against Torture, which prohibits transferring individuals to states where they face a real risk of torture. Kanu’s prior treatment in Nigerian detention (2015-2017) and subsequent reports of mistreatment post-rendition suggest Kenya ignored this obligation.

    “The Mutual Assistance Within the Commonwealth Act and London Scheme emphasize cooperation within the bounds of legality and human rights. Kenya’s apparent collaboration with Nigeria to bypass these frameworks undermines its Commonwealth commitments.

    “The Kenyan government’s role in Nnamdi Kanu’s abduction, torture, and illegal rendition to Nigeria reflects a troubling disregard for its own Constitution, the Kenyan Extradition Act, and treaty obligations under the ICCPR, Mutual Assistance Within the Commonwealth Act, and the London Scheme.

    “Whether through direct involvement or acquiescence by rogue agents, Kenya’s actions—or inaction—enabled a breach of domestic and international law. The lack of formal extradition proceedings, coupled with official denials despite credible allegations, points to a deliberate effort to evade accountability, potentially for political or diplomatic gain.

    “This incident not only jeopardized Kanu’s rights but also damaged Kenya’s reputation as a rule-of-law state within the Commonwealth and global community.”

    How Musk, other billionaires are funding Wisconsin’s Supreme Court race

    Wisconsin’s state supreme court election on April 1 is officially the most expensive in U.S. history, with spending that has reached $76 million — with some predictions that the ultimate tally will top $100 million, almost twice the record spending in the state’s 2023 race. The biggest right-wing groups running an attack ad blitz against liberal candidate Susan Crawford are funded by a few very regressive out-of-state billionaires using their cash like a giant megaphone.

    Elon Musk and Dick Uihlein are the biggest known backers of Republican Brad Schimel’s efforts to win the swing vote seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The uber-controversial Musk has spent over $19 million so far, backing Schimel. Uihlein is bankrolling multiple groups, including some, like the “Women Speak Out” PAC, that are joining an echo chamber of state anti-abortion groups that are all-in on Schimel. Joining the chorus for Schimel are the MAGA get-out-the vote operation Turning Point Action, fossil fuel billionaire Charles Koch’s Americans for Prosperity, the Republican State Leadership Committee (which is heavily funded by groups tied to Federalist Society co-chair and right-wing money man Leonard Leo), the far-right House Freedom Action (tied to the House Freedom Caucus), and the state trade group called Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce.

    The stakes are high: the outcome will decide the fate of abortion access, fair maps, labor rights and more in that swing state. Big money knows that the composition of the court, which for now has a 4-3 progressive majority, hangs in the balance.

    This Wisconsin race stands out for the sheer amount of money being spent, but far-right billionaires and the networks they fund have been spending big across the country in recent elections to install their preferred candidates on state courts — a key lever of power and, in some states, a last bastion of protections for democracy.

    Why State Courts? Why Now?

    State courts are a key line of defense protecting what a majority of Americans want: better-funded public schoolsworker protectionsaccess to abortion care and more. Leo and Koch, in particular, worked for years to capture the U.S. Supreme Court and lower courts to impose unpopular policies by undemocratic means. Some lesser-known GOP billionaires — such as Dick Uihlein and Jeffrey Yass –– have also entered the state court capture effort in recent years.

    Culled from truthout.org

    In your bookstores soon! “The Selectorate”, By Chidi Anselm Odinkalu

    Elections should be decided by the people, but in Nigeria, judges have increasingly assumed the role of kingmakers. The Selectorate traces how judicial interventions have shifted political legitimacy from the electorate to a small clique of legal insiders.

    The-Selectorate-Cover-and-back

    As courtrooms replace polling booths, the right to vote is hollowed out, leaving democracy vulnerable to manipulation. Author Chidi Odinkalu warns that without urgent reform, Africa’s fragile democracies risk becoming judicial oligarchies where power is allocated behind closed doors rather than won through the will of the people.