Home Blog Page 266

Nurse gets four-year-ban for paying patient $3,000 to cut off ex-boyfriend’s penis, tongue

A Nurse, Karenjeet Warburton, has been banned for four years for paying a patient $3,000 to cut her ex-lover’s penis and tongue off and also burn his face with acid in Australia, Daily Mail reports.

Warburton had dated her ex-lover, a senior Queensland Police Inspector, Don McKay, between March 2020 and early 2021.

According to the Daily Mail, the decision was published last week after it was handed down to Karenjeet Kaur Warburton in March by the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal.

Tribunal member Julie Dick heard Warburton had approached a patient she thought “might be up for” severely injuring her former boyfriend, senior Queensland Police Inspector Don McKay.

She gave the patient, Andrew Bown, photos of the inspector and his home between April 1 and October 6, 2021, and handed over $3,000 for the proposed hit.

“She had paid a significant amount and offered an even more significant amount to the proposed assailant,”Ms Dick wrote in the tribunal decision.

“Warburton instructed a law enforcement participant to have Insp McKay’s ‘penis and tongue cut off, his face burnt with acid, his spine to be severed with a knife for the purpose of causing paralysis, or to break every bone in his body so that he could no longer walk or talk.”

Ms Dick noted that Warburton’s efforts only stopped when she was arrested.

She pleaded guilty to one count of attempting to procure grievous bodily harm and one count of attempting to procure a malicious act with intent and was sentenced to five years behind bars, to be suspended after 16 months.

When facing the health tribunal, the former nurse did not contest claims that she had committed professional misconduct by asking a patient to carry out her dirty work.

The tribunal banned Warburton from working in healthcare for four years, which included time she had already served behind bars.

“It is unfortunate that this serious behaviour has led to the respondent being in the difficult circumstances in which she now finds herself,” Ms Dick wrote in her ruling.

“The tribunal is aware she will have to reapply for registration.

“Upon doing so, she will be confronted with having no recency of practice and there will be other steps that she might have to take.”

Bown was charged with committing arson, attempting to procure a person to do grievous bodily harm to another person and possessing a dangerous item to assist another person in committing a crime.

He was sentenced to three-and-a-half years behind bars for his part in the plot by the Cairns District Court in November 2022.

New wig clinches five awards at Call to Bar

The 2025 Call to Bar ceremony saw Miss Daniella Okangba, a 2023 Law graduate of Babcock University, emerge as one of the most outstanding new wigs at this year’s event, with her clinching five prestigious awards, including the coveted third prize for Best Overall student, in Abuja.

This year’s Call to Bar ceremony was historic, with 5,728 new lawyers, the largest cohort in Nigeria’s legal history, officially joining the profession.

Okangba, who graduated with First Class Honours, received the following awards: Justice Olujide Shomolu Award for Best Student in Civil Litigation, Mr. D. D. Dodo award for Best Female Student in Civil Litigation, Hon. Justice Aloma Mariam Mukhtar award for Best Female Student in Civil Litigation, Chief T.O.S. Benson award for Best Student of the Year (3rd Prize) and prize for First Class students.

She expressed excitement about her achievement, saying: “It has been my goal for a long time, and now it’s my reality. I worked consistently and with purpose. I believe excellence is possible with the right mindset and God’s help.”

Her disciplined academic strategy included structured daily study, regular group sessions, and Sabbath rest in line with her Seventh-Day Adventist faith.” I was determined to remain a best graduating student,” she noted, recalling her prior top honours at Babcock. “Once a BGS, always a BGS.”

She credited Babcock’s Faculty of Law for laying the groundwork for her success.

According to her, “Babcock was foundational. The faculty’s support, especially from Prof. Dorcas Odunaoke and Prof. Olanrewaju, kept us encouraged throughout Law School. Most of the curriculum prepared us directly for what we faced at the Law School.”

Currently working at a top-tier corporate law firm, Banwo & Ighodalo, Okangba has set her sights on an ambitious future. Her plans include postgraduate studies at an Ivy League university, becoming a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, entering academia and possibly politics. ” They call me Prof. SAN,” she noted, adding that by God’s grace, that will become a reality.

She advised aspiring lawyers to set their minds to it, trust God and work relentlessly.

“The word impossible doesn’t exist.”

Babcock University’s President/Vice-Chancellor, Prof. Ademola Tayo, expressed immense pride, saying: “Daniella and nine others have brought great honour to our university. This is just the beginning of greater things to come.”

Thisday

Man reportedly impregnates 14-year-old daughter in Ibadan

One Kayode Oluwaseunfunmi has allegedly impregnated his 14-year-old junior secondary school (JSS) daughter, in the Oluyole Local Government Area of Oyo State.

The teenager, whose name has been withheld for legal and ethical reasons, disclosed that the alleged abuse began in December 2024.

Now visibly seven months pregnant, she disclosed that since the death of their mother a decade ago, their father had been the sole caregiver for her and her two siblings.

As a result of the pregnancy, she was unable to participate in her ongoing JSS 3 examinations.

In an emotional appeal, the girl pleaded with authorities not to punish her father.

“I never wanted this to happen. My father has always been my protector since our mother passed away, and I feel so torn inside,” she said.

“He has been there for me and my siblings, doing his best to provide for us. And despite what he did, I still love him deeply.

“It’s hard to reconcile the person I know with the actions that have hurt me. I don’t want our family to be broken apart by this situation; we’ve already lost so much.

“I just wish things could go back to the way they were before all of this. I hope people can see that there’s more to our story and that we need support, not just punishment. My father made a terrible mistake, but I believe there’s a way to heal without completely destroying our family.

“I want help to find a path forward—to ensure that my siblings and I are safe and cared for. I hope the authorities understand my feelings and consider what’s best for all of us.”

Following an investigation, the suspect has been arrested and is being detained at the Orita Police Station in Challenge, Ibadan, pending further legal action.

Meanwhile, the Oyo State Ministry of Women Affairs and Social Inclusion has initiated plans to rehabilitate the girl and ensure that justice is served.

Angry reactions as attorney wife of murdered lawyer, mother-in-law, priest, others bag curious sentence after conviction

Family members and acquaintances of the late Barr Godwin Ikoiwak, a lawyer with the Akwa Ibom State Ministry of Justice, are outraged over the recent judgment by a state high court in Uyo, which handed down a 10-year death sentence to those convicted for the murder of their loved one.

They lamented that maximum punishments were not meted out on the offenders, as only two and 10 years’ sentences were given to persons established by the court to have been involved in murder and accessory to murder.

The wife of the deceased, Barr Abasiesebanga Ikoiwak, a staff of the Court of Appeal Calabar, who was the 1st Defendant, alongside her mother, Mrs Margaret Patrick Umoh, (2nd Defendant), her sister, Owoidoho Patrick Umoh (3rd Defendant) and staff members of St Luke’s Hospital Anua (4th, 5th, 6th Defendants) stood trial on a five-count charge bothering on: conspiracy to murder, murder, accessory after the fact of murder, conspiracy to commit unlawful purpose and issuance of false certificate by Public Officer.

Justice Bassey Nkanang on extended jurisdiction from Mkpat Enin gave the judgement in suit number: Hu/50/2022 State vs (1) Abasieseabanga Godwin Ikoiwak (2) Margaret Patrick Umoh (3) Owoidoho Patrick Umoh (4) Dr Imoh Johnson (5) Dr Isaac Njoku, Rev Father Gabriel Ekong.

Two other defendants, Udeme Patrick Umoh and Isaiah Gideon Isaiah are still at large.

The 1,2,3 defendants were charged with (Count 1) conspiracy to murder – punishable under Section 331 of the Criminal Code, laws of Akwa Ibom State, 2000. (Count – 2); murder- punishable under Section 326(1) of the Criminal Code, cap 38, volume 2, laws of Akwa Ibom State, 2000. (Count 3); accessory after the fact of murder- punishable under section 558 of the Criminal Code, Cap 38, volume 2, laws of Akwa Ibom State. 2000.

The 4, 5, 6 defendants (Dr Imo Johnson, Rev Father Gabriel Ekong and Dr Isaac Njoku), all staffers of St Luke’s hospital, were charged with two count of conspiracy to commit unlawful purpose in count 4, punishable under Section 556(1)(f) of the Criminal Code cap 38, volume 2 laws of Akwa Ibom State, 2000; (Count 5) Issuance of false certificate by Public Officer punishable under Section 109 of the Criminal Code, cap 38 volume 2, laws of Akwa Ibom State 2000.

A total of 14 witnesses were called: the Prosecution called 8 witnesses while the Defence team called 6 witnesses. 51 Exhibits were tendered, identified and admitted.

Reviewing the history of the case, evidence of witnesses, exhibits, submissions of the Prosecution and Defence in a detailed judgement, Justice Nkanang convicted 5 of the 6 defendants, while the 6th defendant – Dr Isaac Njoku was discharged and acquitted.

He read that autopsy showing that the deceased died of poisoning from ingested Organophosphate (Ota piapia in local parlance) in the house of his mother in-law (2nd Defendant) where he went on a visit. The corpse was also reported to have unexplained physical injuries on the left eye socket, neck and ankle.

He also read that from the data snalysis, the first defendant, (wife of the deceased) though was not at the scene of the incident but far away in Calabar in constant communication with the 2nd and 3rd defendants.

From the data also, one Revd. Father Maurice Mbeke was said to have called Rev Father Gabriel Ekong, the Administrator of St Luke’s hospital to ask the possibility of issuing a death certificate of someone who died outside the hospital and the latter answered in affirmative.

Thereafter, he urged the administrator to assist the 1st defendant in that regard to receive the corpse of her husband.

‘Rev. Father Ekong then instructed Dr Imoh Johnson to open a file, issue a medical report and death certificate, which falsely claimed that the deceased was admitted and treated for asthma before he died at the hospital.’

However, Justice Nkanang in his over three-hour judgement convicted the 1st Defendant, Abasieseabanga Godwin Ikoiwak, for accessory after the fact of murder and sentenced her to 2 years in confinement starting from 2022.

Both the mother-in-law of the deceased, Margaret Patrick Umoh and sister in-law, Owoidoho Patrick Umoh, were sentenced to 10 years in prison respectively for his murder. The conviction is to start running from 21st May 2022.

Dr Imoh Johnson was sentenced to 2 years in prison from 25 June 2025, while Rev. Father Gabriel Ekong was given 4 years in prison from June 25, 2025. The terms run concurrently.

”In terms of count two, the 2nd and 3rd defendants are to remain in confinement for the period of 10 years in lieu of death sentence.

“In terms of count four, the 1st, 4th, and 6th defendants are sentenced to two years in confinement. The 5th defendant is discharged and acquitted. The period of confinement of the convicted defendants will run concurrently and starting from the time of arrest. For 1st defendant, 18th day of March 2022. For second defendant Margaret Umoh starting from May 1, 2022, for Owoidoho Umo May 1, 2022. For the 4th defendant Dr Imoh Johnson, Rev Father Gabriel Ekong begin 25th of June, 2025, this is the judgement of the court,” he ruled.

In the meantime, Joseph Umoren, who led other counsel for the state, has served notice of intention to appeal the judgment on Barr Ekpenyong Ntekim, who led the defence of first to third Defendants.

Effiong Abia Esq. and Glory Kofi represented the fourth and fifth Defendants, respectively.

Speaking with newsmen after the judgement, Barr Sunny Anyanwu, who identified himself as the friend and classmate of late Ikoiwak at the University said there were a lot of loopholes in the judgement and wondered how someone established to have facilitated the murder of another would be technically set free under the guise of issuing her two years imprisonment which even started from the inception of the case in 2022.

Anyanwu, who recounted how late Barr Ikoiwak narrated his ordeal to him and spoke to him while going to his in-laws place on that fateful day, expressed dismay that despite his testimonies during the trials and the avalanche of evidence to back up his claims, the convicts were given soft landing.

He urged Ikoiwak’s family and Akwa Ibom Ministry of Justice to take the case further to Appellate court.

His words, ”I carefully listened to the judgement, all I can say is that I’m not happy, I’m speaking on behalf of the family, we are not happy, that’s not a fair judgement at all.

“The court misdirected itself in many issues. Rev Father Mbeke is a reverend father who preaches every Sunday for people to go to heaven while he is the architect of all the whole murder with that of the wife of my friend, but father Mbeke is out of the scene.

“I wonder why he has not been arrested, why he has not visited the trial till today and look at the judgement that was given, was that fair?

”Godwin Ikoiwak’s soul will never rest in peace, it will continue to roam until it gets justice. I am so disappointed. I flew all the way from Abuja to Uyo to hear this judgement but I’m so disappointed.

“I wouldn’t have wasted my flight ticket, if I had had the premonition that it would be this way, I wouldn’t have come.

“The father of the deceased just died November last year out of heartbreak, I am sure he is not happy wherever he is. I was the last person Godwin spoke with when he was going to the in-law’s family house that day. And I went to court to testify, with all the evidence we brought.

“I plead with the attorney general of Akwa Ibom to go on appeal, at least they should be given maximum punishment, this is not maximum punishment, she was just given just two years, someone who coordinated the whole thing.

“The judgement says starting from when she was arrested, in other words, she is free.

“Even when she made a confessional statement in DSS that she did this and she did that. So what happened and the court did not take them into consideration?

“I pray one day the appropriate court will give justice. We will go on appeal, if you leave this kind of judgement, other judges may follow and it may form a precedence. I saw all the flaws in the judgement, I am a lawyer.

“Two persons in connection to Godwin’s murder are at large, why have they not been found, I don’t know.

“Secondly, the law does not look at age when you commit an offense; even if the woman is 100 years old, she has committed an offense and she needs to pay for it; that means when people are old they should start killing people and should be allowed to go free because of age? This was just a miscarriage of justice and I’m not happy.”

On his part, Effiong Abia, counsel to Dr Johnson appreciated the judge’s industry but revealed intentions to appeal the case.

He said, ”there are certain issues we need to test upstairs, of course the judge has already said we have the right to do so.

“In any case, you see six defendants, 51 exhibits, imagine the length of time it took him to deliver that judgement.

“Laws thrive on a principle and this principle seems not to be well applied or applied at all. We will go for an appeal.”

Ikoiwak was said to have been murdered in cold blood during his visit to his in-law’s place.

Trouble started when he allegedly started suspecting his wife of infidelity and questioned the paternity of their children.

He was said to have gone to meet his mother and sister in-laws at Ikono Local Government on the issue but never returned alive.

The wife, who later arrived from Calabar, called her late husband’s family to tell them that their son drove himself to St Luke’s hospital for treatment but died due to asthma attack and blockage of respiratory tract.

She was said to have gone ahead to obtain a death certificate from the hospital with claims that the husband died of asthma.

The deceased’s family, however, on close examination of the corpse, identified bruises on the scalp, left eye socket and ankle.

They refused to buy-in to the rhetoric of the wife and had to drag her to court where it was established through autopsy that Ikoiwak died from ingestion of a poisonous substance after a violent attack.

Daily Post

Let the enemies of Nigerian women speak up now

By Funke Egbemode

Ajin Orompoto definitely was not born to become a king. Yes, she was a princess but tradition forbade women from sitting on the throne of their fathers. According to historical accounts, Alaafin Ajiun Orompotoniyun ended up being the only female Alaafin of Oyo. When her father, Alaafin Ofinran joined his ancestors, his brother, Eguguoju, inherited the throne. Unfortunately, he died young without a male heir. Ajiun’s younger brothers, Princes Ajiboyede And Tella were too young to be in contention and that was how Ajiun stepped up.

If it is not easy to confront the male-ruled system in 2025, one can only imagine how it was in the 16th century when Princess Ajiun stopped the Oyo Mesi’s conspiracy to install one of their own as the successor to Alaafin Eguguoju, Ajiun’s uncle. With unheard of courage, Ajiun told the members of Oyo Mesi to give her seven days and she would become a man. What she did and how she did it is still subject of contention till date but somehow, Ajiun showed up on the seventh day bald- headed, flat-chested, and with a phallus too! Long story short, the princess became king and proved herself worthy of her fathers’ stool.

According to an account by Mojisola Savage, ‘Orompoto introduced cavalry to the Oyo military, a feat believed to be why Oyo became the largest empire in Yoruba history. In 1557, she reportedly went as far as Timbuktu to import horses for her specialised cavalry. She may also have employed a thousand Borgu archers to shoot poisoned arrows from horseback. According to legend, she kept her foot soldiers in front and cavalry behind in battles. Riders tied large leaves to the horses’ tails which swept the ground to cover their tracks. In 1555, a few years after her father reclaimed some of Oyo’s original territories from the Nupes, they retaliated. With her formidable cavalry, she defeated the Nupes. Her renowned cavalry and military strategy distinguished her in subsequent battles, making her one of the most influential Alaafin of the Oyo empire.’

Orompoto died in the Battle of Ilayi in 1562.

So why are we in this particular history class? Because Nigeria’s Oyo Mesi, the patriarchal political cabal in charge of Nigeria’s democracy has held women at bay for years, our breasts and hips seen as obstacles and used to keep us as just cheerleaders in the political parties. To make themselves look and feel good, the men have written a few lines in their party constitutions that mouthed women inclusion a la free or discounted nomination forms for women aspirants.

As if owning a nomination form means anything on the long journey to elected office in Nigeria. Nigeria’s political system is run with a special design to keep women away. Between the huge funds required and the violence deployed before, during and after elections, a female politician needs real balls to be in contention. Since we lack both phallus and funds, we are in relegation. That is why there are only four female lawmakers in the 108-member 10th Senate. Only 16 of the 360 members of the House of Representatives are women. Of the 990 seats of the Houses of Assembly across the nation, only 54 of the legislators are women.

And the saddest figures of all: there are 14 states in Nigeria with no single female lawmaker. In the spirit of naming and shaming, here are the 14 shameless states – Osun [my home state], Abia, Bauchi, Borno, Gombe, Imo, Jigawa, Kano, Katsina, Kebbi, Plateau, Sokoto, Yobe and Zamfara. The steady decline in numbers is curious and shameful. From having 36 women in the National Assembly in 2007, we have sunk to a measly four Senators and 16 Reps.

The system is skewed against female participation in every way and it is time to redress the situation. Unless all the men in this country are unanimously submitting that their mothers, sisters, wives and daughters are useless and of no consequence whatsoever, the time is ripe to amend Sections 48, 49 and 91 of the 1999 Constitution to accommodate 37 additional women senators (one per state and FCT); 17 additional female members of the House of Representatives; and 108 women in State Houses of Assembly (three per state). All of this will cost the nation less than one per cent of the annual national budget! The number of Special Assistants and Personal Assistants across the country cost us more.

Our country is blessed with warrior women who are descendants of great warriors like Alaafin Orompotoniyun who dared the odds and extended the frontiers of Oyo Empire all the way to Timbuktu. Brilliant, resourceful and courageous women are already doing exploits in every sector of our national life from aviation to armed forces.

Those in support of Special Seats for Women Bill say aye. Those against say nay. The ayes have it.

Let the enemies of Nigerian women show their faces.

22-year-old Bill Gates’ daughter lands a new side hustle after billionaire dad said he would not give her money

Phoebe, Bill Gates’s youngest daughter, has landed a new job.

The fashion show regular is working with Sophia Kianni and Tay Nakamoto for a new podcast episode, Sticking With Style.

They are offering tips on upgrading dorm room space for the fall 2025 semester.

The project is part of an endorsement deal with Command Brand, which proves Phoebe is moving more into the world of an influencer.

The 22-year-old studied Human Biology at California‘s Stanford University.

She is the daughter to the Microsoft co-founder, 69, and his philanthropist ex wife Melinda Gates, 60.

Phoebe and her siblings, Jennifer, 28, and Rory, 25, will famously receive a minute percentage of their father’s fortune because Bill will instead divert his mammoth fortune to charitable organizations. 

In April she discussed her father’s extraordinary success and the pressure that brings on her new podcast, The Burnouts, alongside her business partner and close friend, Sophia.

She said: ‘I had so much insecurity and such a desire to prove myself at Stanford.

‘I came in, I was like, ”I’m so privileged, I’m a nepo baby”, like I had so much insecurity around that. I feel it’s so hard when you’re a freshman in college because you have no experience. You have nothing.’

Despite her billionaire father’s gravitas, the graduate, who is dating Sir Paul McCartney‘s grandson, Arthur Donald, said she was ‘flat-out rejected’ from a business class after devising her first pitch, Bluetooth tampons, giving women health status updates throughout their periods.

‘This was our first big failure of many, many, many,’ Phoebe admitted. ‘I don’t think it’s really a shocker that we got flat-out rejected from this class – they asked us, ”What problem does this solve? How would it make money?” We couldn’t answer those questions.’

It wasn’t just her Stanford professors who doubted Phoebe’s entrepreneurial skills, but Bill also blocked his daughter’s request to drop out of school to pursue her debut company despite him doing something similar 49 years earlier.

Phoebe, who will soon launch her company, digital fashion platform Phia, which she describes as a ‘new way to shop’ online, with Kianni, said: ‘I remember even when we wanted to start the company, him being like, ”Are you sure you want to do this?”

‘Because both of my siblings were incredibly intelligent and took very typical career paths – my brother’s a genius, my sister has two kids and a horse-back riding career and is in residency [as a Junior Pediatrician] – but there wasn’t this adverse risk of failure.’

Phoebe and her siblings won’t get a big inheritance.

The star continued: ‘So my parents were really cautious when I was like, ”I want to do Stanford abroad and do this remotely and finish up my degree and do the start-up”.

‘They were very much like, ”You need to finish your degree. You don’t just get to drop out and [start] a company.” Which is so funny because my dad literally did that – that’s like the reason I’m able to go to Stanford, have my tuition paid.’

Bill dropped out of Harvard in 1975 after three semesters to start Microsoft, a decision which helped earn him his estimated $107 billion (£83 billion), according to Forbes.

Phoebe added that, despite having a close relationship with her father, she has few recollections of him discussing Microsoft with her.

‘I literally never remember my dad talking to me about the start of Microsoft. I literally mostly just remember him talking about the Foundation,’ she said.

Instead of depending entirely on knowledge passed down from her father, Phoebe claimed that she is securing her future through a solid work ethic.

She said: ‘I really like the results we’re seeing – and this is not just true for business, but any career you’re in: it is just the result of habits.

‘The tracking we’re seeing with our product is really just the result of our habits; it’s the result of loving your work, waking up early, working ’til damn late on this company because you love it.

‘It’s not work-life balance: this is your life, and you really enjoy it. It has to be fun, and you have to have the habits built around that.

‘And controlling – being able to control that part of your brain that wants to stay in bed and being like, I don’t want to eat but I need to go eat lunch because I need to be productive this afternoon.’

Gates offered the example of embracing rejection as a habit she and Kianni adopted to enable success.

She said: ‘A habit that we had that I thought was so good at the beginning was just constant outreach and constant acceptance of rejection.

‘When we were trying to get our first partnerships for Phia, we would outreach like… we maxed out the LinkedIn credits. And they wouldn’t grant us more because we hit the limit.

‘We’d get people respond like, ”Please leave me alone and never email me”. We’d still respond again.

‘I really feel the greatest lesson from this is vulnerability is not embarrassing. Yes, our cold email outreach template was awful at first, and it was a complete flop, but I’ve connected with some of those people now, and they were like, ”Good for you for reaching out in college.”

The star added: ‘The biggest things we’ve learned is have that vulnerability – you just need to take shots on goal.’

Oshiomhole’s toxic advice to Okpebholo

By Suyi Ayodele

It was meant to be a joyous occasion. Governor Monday Okpebholo of Edo State has just been affirmed as the governor of the state by the Supreme Court. Okpebholo’s election was challenged by Asue Ighodalo, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidate in the September 22, 2024, governorship election. The soft-spoken former senator had won all the litigations from the petition tribunal, through the Appeal Court and up to the Supreme Court. Such a feat calls for celebration.

The governor’s party’s stalwarts from the All Progressives Congress (APC) gathered somewhere in Abuja to savour the victory; the last of any litigation that could come his way on account of the election. The mood was peaceful. Leaders, one after the other, took time to appraise the situation. All of them gave glory to God for seeing their candidate and party through the tedious court proceedings. They were united that it was time for Governor Okpebholo to hit the ground running and bring good governance to the people of Edo State.

Then it was time for Comrade Adams Oshiomhole to talk. Penultimate Saturday in Benin City at the APC South-South stakeholders meeting, Oshiomhole was reduced to a mere seconder of the motion to adopt President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and all the four APC governors from the zone for a second term. Senate President Godswill Akpabio presided over that engagement. Oshiomhole, a former governor of Edo State, former National Chairman of the APC and former President of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) was reduced to a mere spectator at the Victor Uwaifo Creative Hub, the venue of the APC meeting. Why did that happen?

I hate to speculate. Methinks that the leadership of the meeting knew that Oshiomhole might pollute the atmosphere if allowed to talk. He had at the Progressives Governors Forum (PGF) meeting held in the same Benin City days earlier made some unguarded statements! One may, therefore, conclude that shutting him out was to avoid another verbal disaster. You don’t have to believe this claim, especially if you are not familiar with the politics of the Senate Presidency playing out in the South-South.

Now back to the Abuja celebration of Okpebholo’s victory at the Apex Court. Immediately, Oshiomhole held the microphone, all attention shifted to him. And he answered his name that day. Ogun, the Yoruba god of iron, is praised as Okùnrin kúkúrú abìjà kankan (The short man with a tenacious fighting spirit). Oshiomhole shares that praise name with Ogun. This is what the septuagenarian politician cum labour leader said:

“You now have the time to look into that hotel about which they say Edo money, in tens of billions of naira, was spent, and now they claim it’s just a minority shareholding. You have time to revisit all those roads that were built at the worst costs compared to the ones I built and that are still there. Governor Obaseki must come out of hiding to answer these questions.”

From those statements, it is clear that the only thing that is paramount in the mind of Oshiomhole is the probe of former Governor Godwin Obaseki, the immediate past governor of the state. Obaseki, as we know, is Oshiomhole’s successor as governor. But a long-articulated vehicle has since passed between the once-two-jolly-good-fellows! How Obaseki, who at a time was Oshiomhole’s best man at his wedding, turned out to be an archenemy of the senator representing Edo North Senatorial District is what should interest political scientists and anyone desirous of studying ‘how friends become enemies’ as a research proposition.

My immediate reaction to Oshiomhole’s call for the Obaseki probe is to quickly look at how convenient it is for Oshiomhole to speak from the two sides of his mouth without qualms! What sort of human being can have two or more opinions about an individual within a short space of time? Again, how come that of all the lofty ideas anyone could give to Governor Okpebholo, the only one that easily came to Oshiomhole is the idea of a probe and its attendant distractions? Why don’t our leaders consider the consequences of their utterances first?

Dr. John L. Gustavson is a Neuropsychologist in Grand Junction, Colorado, USA. He is reputed to have “special training and skill in evaluating and treating nervous system disorders, and determining how illnesses, injuries, and diseases of the brain and nervous system influence the way a patient feels, thinks, and behaves.” When asked to define why people talk first before thinking, Gustavson named such a condition as “Verbal Disinhibition” or simply “Disinhibition.” Here is his definition of the neuropsychological term, Verbal Disinhibition:

“Verbal disinhibition” or simply “disinhibition.” is saying or acting impulsively without considering the potentially damaging or embarrassing consequences of the words or deeds. Disinhibition may result from a brain injury, intoxication, mental illness, or MERE STUPIDITY (emphasis mine).”

How fitting is this definition? While the 2024 Edo governorship electioneering lasted, all the statements that could have cost the APC the election were made by Oshiomhole. He, for instance, almost ruined the APC campaign then with his allusion to a couple married for many years without a child between them! Yet, he is an elder statesman, going by his age, experience and political outings.

The elders of my place reason that when there is an elder in the marketplace, a child strapped to her mother’s back is not likely to have his neck twisted (Àgbà ki wà l’ójà kí orí omo tuntun wó). But shouldn’t we rethink the axiom, given that we have elders in the mould of Oshiomhole around us? Or which is more dignifying to ask the governor: to give the best to the people and to ask him to go witch-hunting for an imaginary frenemy? Why do Oshiomhole’s friends always turn to his enemies?

For instance, when in 2016, Oshiomhole was selling the same Obaseki to the Edo people, he called him the compressor of the air-conditioning of his government’s economic car. That was at a time Oshiomhole appointed Obaseki as the head of the economic team of the government for eight years. Oshiomhole told the entire Edo people that his administration would not have achieved anything but for Obaseki who generated the funds and managed the state’s economy prudently!

At another time, specifically on January 18, 2018, when the then Governor Obaseki bought a fleet of buses for intra-city transportation, Oshiomhole enthused: “I am humbled by your accomplishments, and I am proud that we made promises on your behalf during the 2016 electioneering period and you have accomplished a lot of the promises. You are working tirelessly to industrialise the state and make life easy for the people. Many governors are complaining that there is no money, and they are unable to pay salaries, but you have developed your creativity to attract resources to the state.” Today, the same Obaseki, in Oshiomhole’s judgement, is the lead character in the Arabic folk tale, ‘Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves’, and he must be probed!

Obaseki is not the first to suffer from Oshiomhole’s “verbal disinhibition.” On July 16, 2012, after Oshiomhole was declared winner of his second term governorship bid election, he described the then President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan as, “…Indeed a statesman, a man of honour because there was adequate and effective presence of security agents on ground. I am impressed because the army actually played a neutral role in the election.”

Move forward to June 14, 2017, when Oshiomhole was assessing the same President Jonathan, hear his magisterial conclusion: “Nigeria was in danger if Jonathan continued in office.” The same “statesman and man of honour” suddenly became the one of whom Oshiomhole would later say: “Once I concluded that Nigeria was not in good hands, I also had to do everything possible to ensure that he (Jonathan) was not re-elected…”

The Edo-born politician did not spare his own too. On November 7, 2019, as the National Chairman of the APC, Oshiomhole’s verdict on the performance of the late President Muhammadu Buhari was a president that “has done well”. He eulogised Buhari, who passed on, on Sunday, in a London hospital, and said: “President Buhari can beat his chest to say I have started well; I have started fast. You cannot call him Baba Go Slow now. This time, he is Baba Fast,”

Fast forward again to Saturday, June 28, 2025, and listen to Oshiomhole describe Buhari’s administration as the ruiner of the nation’s economy. Speaking at the PGF meeting in Benin City, Oshiomhole said the Buhari administration, by using the Ways and Means policy, “printed over N31 trillion”, adding that the “excessive printing of money” crippled the naira.

“This is what the immediate past CBN governor was doing. In the Senate, we have the record that they printed over N31 trillion which they called Ways and Means. You know when the government wants to deceive people they use jargon. They called it Ways and Means but I can tell you what it means: it means a situation in which the government prints banknotes, not based on what we have earned or any resources, just print banknotes to go and share with the people to meet their money illusion. It is the result of that excessive printing of banknotes that led to the collapse of the naira,” Oshiomhole ruled of the same administration he once said was the best ever!

So, when he counselled Okpebholo to probe Obaseki, I wondered how the voluble politician would explain how he transformed from a khaki-wearing labour man to a man of stupendous wealth that he is today! Is Oshiomhole ready to answer questions such as: What was his worth as a labour leader? What is his worth today? How did he acquire his Iyamoh countryside village-within-village home? How about the property in Abuja, the vehicles in his convoy and many more luxuries?

Please get me right. Okpebholo should, by all means, probe Obaseki. No past leaders suspected to have helped himself to our patrimony should keep and enjoy the proceeds of such heists. But, please, let us extend the probe to Oshiomhole. Let us see how clean he was as a governor. If he turns out to be a saint at the end of the exercise, let us raise a fund-me account to sponsor his beautification!

Thankfully, Governor Okpebholo appears to have heeded Oshiomhole’s prompting. The governor has said that he would probe Obaseki. He even mentioned some outrageous figures he alleged Obaseki misappropriated. I think in the interest of the public, Obaseki should be made to account for what he did or failed to do while in office.

I also hope that Okpebholo himself will begin to keep a clean slate of events while in the saddle because no matter how long he spends in office, he will vacate it one day, and he will be summoned to account for all his actions and inactions. I think Nigeria is on the path to good governance with this call to accountability.

The only advice here is that Okpebholo should not allow those with low emotional control to dictate the pace to him. The governor should know that his primary duty is good governance; to make life more abundant for the Edo people, home and in the diaspora.

I don’t know the governor’s mental aptitude to cope with distractions. He should do a self-assessment to determine if he can combine governance with political distractions of probes and what have you. More importantly, he should know the Obaseki camp will not sit back, and that it is not going to be an amala and ewedu exercise.

More importantly, Governor Okpebholo, I think, should begin to change the narrative that he is a man without his mind. Now that the distraction of litigation over his governorship is over, he should begin to demonstrate that he has the capabilities in all ramifications, to direct the affairs of the state according to his personal convictions and judgment of what is good for the state and its people. He must show that he doesn’t need a human prompter like Oshiomhole before he can take the right step as the governor of the state.

The governor should not allow any individual to use him to settle any personal score. If probing Obaseki is the best for his administration and the people of Edo State, Okpebholo should go ahead and do that. But if that exercise is just to satisfy the bruised ego of some megalomaniacs somewhere, the governor should think twice.

Oshiomhole brought Obaseki to Edo State and made him the head of his economic team for eight years. Against all protestations, he went ahead and made Obaseki governor, deploying all the state’s machinery to back him up. Whatever went sour between him and his godson after 12 years of romance remains personal to the two of them. Nobody has the illusion that Oshiomhole fought Obaseki because the latter was not doing the right thing. We can only hope that one day, the duo will have the moral courage to tell the whole world what went wrong between the groom and his best man!

I hate to dwell on the reality that if Oshiomhole were to have his way, Okpebholo would not have been in the saddle today as the governor of Edo State! In fact, Okpebholo’s clan, the entire Esanland, would not have been anywhere near the Dennis Osadebey Avenue known as Edo State Government House! But success, they say, has many relations. If there is equity in the Edo political structure today, the credit goes to Obaseki and his sense of fairness and tenacity of purpose when it mattered. His Esan Agenda proposition and the tenacity with which he prosecuted it, produced a governor of Esan extraction in Okpebholo today! Oshiomhole, the new adviser-in-chief today, had other plans!

I submit, however, that the fact that Obaseki pushed for a governor of Esan extraction is never an excuse why he should not be called to account for how he managed Edo affairs and its finances when he was governor. The only plea here is that Governor Okpebholo should look beyond Obaseki and probe how much of Edo money was committed to, for instance, the Airport Road project and the Benin Water Storm project. The probe should be holistic!

The views expressed by contributors are strictly personal and not of Law & Society Magazine.

Brigitte Macron appeals to France’s highest court over acquittal of women in gender rumour case

The first lady of France Brigitte Macron, has taken her case against two women over claims she used to be man to the highest appeal court in the country after a lower court cleared them.

On Thursday, the Paris appeals court overturned earlier convictions against the two women for spreading false claims that went viral online.

They had alleged that the 72-year-old Mrs. Macron used to be a man.

The fake news about her gender has circulated on social media for years, just as her 24-year age difference with President Emmanuel Macron has also attracted much comment.

Brigitte filed a libel complaint against the two women after they posted a YouTube video in December 2021, alleging she had once been a man named Jean-Michel Trogneux – who is actually Brigitte’s brother.

In the video, defendant Amandine Roy, a self-proclaimed spiritual medium, interviewed Natacha Rey, a self-described independent journalist, for four hours on her YouTube channel. Rey spoke about the “state lie” and “scam” she claimed to have uncovered that Trogneux had changed gender to become Brigitte, and then married the future president.

The claim went viral, including among conspiracy theorists in the United States

A lower court in September last year had ordered the two women to pay €8,000 in damages to Brigitte, and €5,000 to her brother. Brigitte’s lawyer Jean Ennochi told Agence France-Press Sunday that her brother, too, was taking his case against the dismissal of the charges to the highest appeals court, the Court de Cassation.

AFP

Just In: Akpabio goes on appeal over judgement ordering Senator Natasha’s recall to Senate

Senate President Godswill Akpabio has filed a notice of appeal challenging the judgment of a Federal High Court, Abuja, which ordered the recall of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan to the Senate after her contentious suspension. 

The notice of appeal, obtained by SaharaReporters on Monday, is dated July 14, 2025, and was filed at the Court of Appeal, Abuja Judicial Division.

The appeal, marked CA/A//2025, stems from suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/384/2025, which was instituted by Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan to contest her suspension from the Red Chamber. 

In the notice of appeal, Akpabio is appealing on 11 grounds and asking the appellate court to set aside the judgment delivered on July 4, 2025, by Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court. 

The court had ordered the Senate to recall Akpoti-Uduaghan, describing her six-month suspension as excessive and lacking legal justification.

Akpabio, through his legal team, argues that the Federal High Court erred in law when it assumed jurisdiction over a matter which, according to him, pertains to the internal workings of the National Assembly and therefore falls outside the court’s jurisdiction as prescribed by Section 251 of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. 

He contends that the Federal High Court has no powers to adjudicate on matters concerning the existence or extent of the legal rights and privileges of a member of the National Assembly.

In the notice of appeal, Akpabio listed several parts of the High Court’s ruling which he is dissatisfied with. 

He specifically challenges the court’s dismissal of his preliminary objection, its pronouncement on the validity and duration of Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suspension, and its recommendation that the Senate should recall her to resume her duties.

Akpabio’s grounds of appeal include the argument that the trial judge occasioned a miscarriage of justice by assuming jurisdiction over Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suit, which was filed prematurely and in contravention of the Senate’s internal dispute resolution mechanisms as stipulated in the Senate Standing Orders 2023 (as amended). 

He further insists that the matter should have been resolved internally by the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions before Akpoti-Uduaghan approached the court.

The Senate President also argues that the lower court failed to apply the provisions of the Legislative Houses (Powers and Privileges) Act, which shield legislative proceedings from judicial scrutiny. 

He stated that Akpoti-Uduaghan’s complaint arose from words spoken during a plenary session and from resolutions passed by the Senate, both of which are protected under the Act.

He accuses the Federal High Court of breaching his right to fair hearing by raising issues suo motu which were neither pleaded by any party nor canvassed during the proceedings. 

Specifically, he contends that the trial judge improperly introduced the question of whether the six-month suspension imposed on Akpoti-Uduaghan was excessive and went ahead to make a recommendation for her recall without hearing from the parties on the matter.

According to the notice of appeal, Akpabio’s legal team argues that the lower court erred when it ruled on Akpoti-Uduaghan’s interlocutory application by merging the reliefs sought therein with those in her substantive originating summons, despite the duplication of reliefs in both applications.

 He also claims that the court acted improperly by proceeding to hear and determine the substantive suit despite Akpoti-Uduaghan’s violation of the court’s earlier order restraining parties from making public comments on the matter.

In addition to these claims, Akpabio argues that the Federal High Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit because Akpoti-Uduaghan failed to comply with the statutory requirement under Section 21 of the Legislative Houses (Powers and Privileges) Act, which mandates any person with a cause of action against a legislative house to serve a three-month written notice on the Clerk of the National Assembly disclosing the cause of action and the reliefs sought.

In the reliefs sought before the Court of Appeal, Akpabio is praying for an order allowing the appeal and setting aside the parts of the judgement where the lower court dismissed his preliminary objection, held that the six-month suspension was excessive, and recommended that the Senate should recall Akpoti-Uduaghan. 

He is also seeking an order striking out what he described as duplicated reliefs in Akpoti-Uduaghan’s applications for interlocutory injunction, mandatory injunction and originating summons. Furthermore, Akpabio is asking the Court of Appeal to invoke its powers under Section 15 of the Court of Appeal Act to dismiss Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suit for lack of jurisdiction.

In the notice of appeal, Akpabio’s legal team argues that the trial court went beyond its constitutional powers by offering what they describe as “advisory opinions” to the Senate on how it should handle the recall of a suspended member. They insist that the court lacked jurisdiction to interfere in the internal affairs of the Senate or to recommend amendments to the Senate Standing Orders.

The reliefs sought by Senate President Akpabio, as contained in the court document, read:

“i) AN ORDER of this Honourable Court allowing this cross-appeal.

“ii) AN ORDER of this Honourable Court setting aside the parts of the decision of the lower Court where the lower court dismissed the Appellant’s preliminary objection, and opined that (i) the 6 month suspension of the 1st Respondent was excessive and (ii) it believed that the 3rd Respondent should recall the 1 Respondent to the Senate.

“iii) AN ORDER of this Honourable Court striking out duplicated reliefs contained in the 1ª Respondent’s application for interlocutory injunction, application for mandatory injunction and originating summons.

“iv) AN ORDER of this Honourable Court invoking the powers of this Honourable Court under Section 15 of the Court of Appeal Act to determine the Appellant’s notice of preliminary objection and dismiss the 1st Respondent’s suit at the lower Court for want of jurisdiction.

“v) ANY OTHER ORDERS the Court may deem fit to grant in the interest of justice.”

Yahaya Bello’s Bid To Travel Abroad For Medicals: Lawyer backs EFCC’s position, ‘Only in Nigeria can this type of application can be granted’

Sequel to the argument of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) that Yahaya Adoza Bello, former governor of Kogi state should visit the top-notch hospital he reportedly built in Kogi state for his medicals rather than seek to travel abroad on health grounds as he requested a Federal High Court in Abuja for, a Nigerian lawyer remarked that, ‘bringing such application is an insult to the integrity of our health system.”

Piqued by Bello’s application, Tosin Ojaomo Esq. said: “It is only in Nigeria that this type of application can be granted by a judge. Bringing such an application is an insult to the integrity of our health system. The allegation against the defendant is that he denied the people, including himself, of a decent health care system by converting their commonwealth to his personal use.

“Ordinarily, this type of application ought to be dismissed with punitive costs. Every time this type of issue comes up, I always remember the way the legal system in the UK held on to Senator Ekweremadu, not minding his status or the several appeals from Nigerian authorities.

“The law should be a respecter of no one. That is what the rule of law entails and not rule of law by personality. That is a pure segregational application of the law, which is what is currently plaguing the Nigerian legal corridor.

EFCC had kicked against a fresh application by the embattled former Kogi State Governor.

Bello, in his fresh application, is seeking to travel out of Nigeria for medical treatment amid his ongoing trial over an alleged ₦80.2billion money laundering scandal.

This was announced in a press statement narrating a heated legal battle at the Federal High Court in Maitama, Abuja, on Thursday, June 27, 2025.

The agency told Justice Emeka Nwite that the move by Bello’s legal team was not only a gross abuse of court process but also a veiled attempt to escape justice under the guise of seeking medical care abroad.

Bello’s counsel, Joseph Daudu, SAN, had presented the application to the court, asking for permission for his client to travel overseas on health grounds.

Citing Section 173(2)(a) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) and the court’s inherent powers, Daudu argued that Bello’s medical needs could not be addressed locally, not even in the multi-billion naira hospital he commissioned during his tenure in Kogi.

The former governor’s application was backed by a 22-paragraph affidavit personally deposed to by Bello, with attached medical reports and a letter from a consultant cardiologist, whose identity or professional credentials the prosecution later questioned.

Daudu said his client had not left Nigeria in over eight years and was now in need of urgent attention.

“This is about releasing his passport, which he surrendered as part of his bail conditions. The issue is not whether there are hospitals in Nigeria, but whether the defendant is a flight risk. He has no criminal record abroad and will return before the end of August. My Lord can even fix a return date,” he told the court.

But the EFCC’s lead prosecutor, Kemi Pinheiro, SAN, came down hard on the request, accusing Bello of filing similar applications before multiple courts in a deliberate attempt to mislead and derail proceedings.

“This is a gross abuse of court process,” Pinheiro thundered.

“The motion is technically incompetent. His sureties were not notified or made parties to this motion. If he absconds, who takes responsibility?”

He warned that the ex-governor posed a high flight risk and could face international arrest. “This man is already on a red alert. He risks being picked up overseas and extradited. He could be Hushpuppied out of Dubai,” he warned, referencing the infamous arrest and extradition of Nigerian Instagram celebrity, Hushpuppi, over cybercrime.

Pinheiro also dismissed the medical report submitted by Bello’s team, ridiculing its contents and author.

“The doctor who signed the report did not include his qualifications or specialty. And what are we talking about here? Low potassium? Mild hypertension? Those can be handled in any Nigerian hospital. If he needs potassium, let him eat banana and pawpaw,” the EFCC lawyer said.

He further mocked Bello’s claims of a failing health system, saying, “From Abuja to Lokoja is two hours. He built a world-class hospital in Kogi. Let him use it instead of boarding a six-hour flight to the UK.”

Pinheiro also reminded the court of the nature of the charges facing the former governor, stating that money laundering is a transnational crime. “This matter involves funds traced to foreign accounts in the US and UK, and properties in Dubai. It is international in scope.”

In a final push, Daudu insisted that the application was in line with legal procedure, stating that the EFCC’s red notice had expired since Bello was now within the court’s jurisdiction. 

“The sureties do not need to be part of this application,” he maintained, urging the court to act with discretion and allow Bello to attend to his health abroad.

Justice Emeka Nwite is expected to rule on the application at a later adjourned date. 

TIPS