Home Blog Page 265

Just In: Tinubu renames University of Maiduguri after Buhari

Nigeria’s President Bola Tinubu has approved the renaming of the University of Maiduguri, Borno State, as the Muhammadu Buhari University.

“May we now adopt the University of the Maduguri as the Muhammadu Buhari University,” Tinubu said at the close of a special session of the Federal Executive Council held to honour Buhari at the Aso Rock Villa, Abuja on Thursday.

Earlier, the President paid a glowing tribute to Buhari, describing him as “a good man, a decent man, an honourable man” whose legacy of discipline, patriotism, and moral uprightness would endure for generations.

Tinubu said although the late president was not without flaws, his unwavering commitment to national service set him apart.

“President Buhari was not a perfect man, no leader is, but he was, in every sense of the word, a good man, a decent man, an honourable man.

“His record will be debated, as all legacies are, but the character he brought to public life, the moral force he carried, the incorruptible standard he represented, will not be forgotten.

“His was a life lived in full service to Nigeria, and in fidelity to God,” he said.

Reflecting on Buhari’s time in office and his long military and civil service, Tinubu praised the late leader’s simplicity, humility, and stoic resistance to the trappings of power.

He said, “He stood, always, ramrod straight; unmoved by the temptation of power, unseduced by applause and unafraid of the loneliness that often visits those who do what is right, rather than what is popular.

“His was a quiet courage, a righteousness that never announced itself. His patriotism was lived more in action than in words.”

Tinubu also recounted their political alliance, which culminated in the historic 2015 elections that marked Nigeria’s first democratic transfer of power from one ruling party to another.

“We stood together, he and I. Alongside others drawn from across the political spectrum, regions and tongues, we formed an alliance that enabled Nigeria to experience its first true democratic transfer of power from one ruling party to another.

“When he was sworn in as our party’s first elected President, he led with restraint, governed with dignity, and bore the burdens of leadership without complaint,” he said.

The President expressed admiration for Buhari’s post-office modesty, noting that he returned to his hometown, Daura, without seeking to wield influence behind the scenes.

“When his tenure ended, he returned to Daura; not to command from the shadows or to hold court, but to live as he always had, never seeking to impose his will but content to let others carry the nation forward.

“Even in death, he maintained the serenity that defined him in life: not a sigh, not a groan, just a quiet submission to the will of God. Such was the man Nigeria has lost. Such was the man for whom our nation now mourns,” he added.

Tinubu thanked the Inter-Ministerial Committee and Katsina State Governor, Dikko Radda, for organising a befitting state funeral within 48 hours, describing it as a “profound honour” to lead the burial procession in Daura.

He concluded his tribute with a prayer: “Mai Gaskiya, the People’s General, the Farmer President, your duty is done. May Almighty Allah forgive his shortcomings and grant him Aljannah Firdaus. May his life continue to inspire generations of Nigerians to serve with courage, conviction, and selflessness. President Buhari, thank you. Nigeria will remember you.”

Buhari died on Sunday, July 13, at the age of 82.

Federal High Court says EFCC’s marking of properties is unconstitutional, awards ₦200,000 in damages for defacing buildings without court order

The Federal High Court in Abuja has held that it is unlawful for the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to mark properties under investigation without first obtaining an order of court.

In a landmark verdict delivered by Justice J.K. Omotosho, the court ruled in favour of Hajiya Hajara Saidu and Abdullahi Saidu in Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/682/2024.

The plaintiffs had challenged the EFCC’s practice of painting the words “EFCC UNDER INVESTIGATION, KEEP OFF” in red on their properties in both 2023 and 2024.

Represented by counsel H.A. Kwrabai, the plaintiffs described the EFCC’s actions as defamatory, degrading, and lacking any legal justification, particularly since no criminal charges had been filed since the investigations began. The marked properties included Abdullahi Saidu’s residence and his business premises in Abuja.

In his ruling, Justice Omotosho held that the EFCC’s conduct violated Sections 34 and 44 of the 1999 Constitution, which protect citizens from degrading treatment and unlawful interference with property. The inscriptions were deemed damaging to the plaintiffs’ reputations and a source of serious social stigma.

The court granted several key reliefs, including:

  • A declaration that the EFCC lacks the legal authority to deface private property without prior judicial approval.
  • A declaration that prolonged investigations without formal charges harm individuals’ dignity and reputations.
  • A declaration that investigations can proceed without publicly marking properties.
  • An order requiring the EFCC to immediately remove the inscriptions, with court officials authorized to enforce compliance within 24 hours.
  • An award of ₦200,000 in general damages for reputational harm.
  • A declaration that any law or regulation allowing such property markings without court authorization is unconstitutional and void.
  • An injunction restraining the EFCC from further defacing or interfering with the plaintiffs’ properties without a valid court order.

The EFCC, represented by G.G. Gajere on behalf of M.M. Gwani, argued that the markings were intended to prevent the disposal of assets under investigation. However, the commission failed to present any court order supporting the action.

Justice Omotosho emphasized that although Sections 6 and 7 of the EFCC Establishment Act (2004) grant investigative powers, those powers must be exercised within the limits of the Constitution and must not infringe on the rights of Nigerian citizens.

Describing the verdict as a major win for constitutional rights and due process, plaintiffs’ counsel H.A. Kwrabai stated the judgment sends a strong signal that investigative agencies must uphold the rule of law and respect individual dignity and property rights.

Land ownership is a Legal Right, Not an Ancestral Claim. Otu Okaiwu Abuja replies Yoruba Conservatives Group (YCS)

Press Statement

Otu Oka-Iwu Abuja hereby condemns the recent statement attributed to a so-called “Yoruba Conservative” (YCS) Group. The statement is not only legally unfounded but also dangerously inflammatory, threatening the peace, unity, and constitutional order of our nation.

Under the Land Use Act of 1978, all land in Nigeria is vested in the Governor of each state, who holds it in trust for the people. A Certificate of Occupancy (C of O) is a statutory document issued by the government that confers legal rights to occupy and use land for a specified period, typically 99 years. It is the highest form of title recognized under Nigerian law and is enforceable in court.

To claim that a C of O “doesn’t stop us from retrieving land” is a direct affront to the Nigerian Constitution. Section 43 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria guarantees that “every citizen of Nigeria shall have the right to acquire and own immovable property anywhere in Nigeria”. This right is not conditional on ethnicity, origin, or ancestral ties. Any attempt to undermine this constitutional provision is not only illegal but also a threat to national unity.

Contrary to the false claims made by the group, non-Igbos do own land in Igboland. In cities like Enugu, Owerri, and Aba, many Yoruba, Hausa, and other ethnic groups have purchased land, built homes, and established thriving businesses. Igboland has historically welcomed investors and settlers from across Nigeria and continues to do so.

The rhetoric expressed by the “Yoruba Conservative” Group amounts to incitement to violence, ethnic discrimination, and unlawful threats to property and life. We hereby call on the Inspector General of Police to investigate, arrest, and prosecute the leaders of this group for promoting division, hate speech, and threats to national security.

Nigeria is a multi-ethnic, democratic nation governed by law, not by ancestral sentiment or vigilante declarations. We must all uphold the Constitution and reject any ideology that seeks to divide us. Let it be known that Lagos belongs to all Nigerians, just as Enugu, Kano, and Port Harcourt do.

Sir. Chidi Udekwe
PRESIDENT
Otu Oka-iwu, Abuja

Man detained for five months in Kogi prison for criticising state Accountant General on Facebook

The Accountant General of Kogi State, Dr. Habibat Oyiza Tijjani, has been accused of using her office to order the prolonged detention of a Facebook user, Sadiq Abdulhameed, popularly known online as Ododo D’Flower Boiz Vanguard (Fancy), over a social media post critical of her conduct.

Despite appeals from family members, friends, and colleagues, Sadiq remains incarcerated, now going into his fifth month in detention. He was reportedly arrested in February 2025 following a Facebook post he made on February 13.

In the post, Comrade Sadiq criticised Dr. Tijjani’s style of leadership, accusing her of creating an atmosphere of fear within the civil service and meddling in the duties of other public officials. He also alleged that she showed blatant disregard for local government chairpersons across the state.

SaharaReporters gathered that Sadiq is currently being held at the Federal Medium Security Custodial Centre in Koton Karfe, Kogi State.

“Five months have gone by—five long months of sleepless nights and lost days behind bars,” a source said.

“During this time, family and friends have pleaded, prayed, and begged for mercy on his behalf. Yet, the Accountant General remains unmoved—her stance unyielding, her heart untouched.”

The Post That Sparked Detention

In the Facebook post dated February 13, 2025, Sadiq launched a strongly worded criticism of the Kogi State Accountant General, Habibat, accusing her of arrogance, interference, and a lack of respect for fellow government officials, particularly local government chairpersons.

He began by expressing disappointment over what he described as the “unwanted recognition” allegedly given to political activist Usman Austin Okai by state officials, suggesting that Okai, whom he labelled a “tribal bigot,” was being used by cabinet members as a mouthpiece to curry favour with the state governor, Alhaji Ahmed Usman Ododo. Sadiq claimed this was a dangerous gamble, as Okai could not be trusted.

He then pivoted to directly address the Accountant General, accusing her of dominating the administration and stifling other government officials.

He described her as acting “superior” and “like a big masquerade,” alleging that she talked down to local government chairmen and treated them with disrespect, despite the fact that they were elected representatives, unlike her, an appointee.

Sadiq further alleged that the AG interfered in other offices beyond her jurisdiction, under the guise of promoting accountability, but without the necessary decorum. This, he said, was causing “unnecessary tension” within the state’s cabinet.

He warned that public sentiment was turning against her, stating that “95% of Kogites” were displeased with her leadership style. He urged her to reflect on the impermanence of political appointments and to prioritise cordial relationships, reminding her that “life after politics is key.”

Despite some praise for members of the ruling APC for defending the administration, he reiterated that his criticism was not out of personal animosity but a desire to protect the image of Governor Ododo’s government from internal unrest and public backlash.

He wrote, “MUMMY HABIBAT, Plz allow your colleagues in same Govt BREATH IN PEACE. You Are Like A Big Masquerade To Them, No Atom Of REGARDS to anybody most especially the LOCAL GOV’T EXECUTIVE CHAIRMEN in Kogi State, You address them Like Little Children when they appear before you.

“THEY ARE DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED PLEASE FOR CRYING OUT LOUD, Not An Appointee As You Are, stop acting SUPERIOR, BOSS on Gov’t Officials…

‘If Truly You Are Interfering In Other Offices’ Affairs Ahead Of Yours, Though Maybe For Accountability, Please Try To Be Applying Decorum Because None Of Them Are Kids That You Talk To Them Anyhow, Creating Unnecessary Tension Among The Cabinet Members..”

‘We have Had Plenty State AG before you, and You Won’t Remain There Forever,” he added.

‘95% OF KOGITES ARE COMPLAINING ABOUT YOU MADAM AG, We Are Not Pleased With Your Leadership Except For FAWWAS and IS NOT HEALTHY FOR THE STATE GOVERNOR, Gov. ODODO and Entire Kogi State At Large.”

Sadiq’s detention has generated outrage online, with many condemning his incarceration.

For instance, Gadafi Idreez wrote on Facebook, “Freedom for Ododo boy Pöwer Drùnk in Kogi .. Emötiõns are getting high. People are gathering momentum. Free Ododo D’Flower Boiz Vanguard. Prötëst is about to hit the streets of Okene in the coming days. Accountant General. Free ODODO boy. Do you support Physical prötest or Online protest?”

Prince Abdulsalam Ayab wrote: “Okehi Youths should storm the event with a template to be tag ‘free Ododo D’Flower Boiz Vanguard, ‘ be some of the APC stakeholders who may seems not to know about his detention will know and let the needful be done.

“We’re in dramatic government where there is fundamental rights that govern every citizens, if an individual violate any rules, he or she should be punish accordingly and to the constitutions, not by means of oppression.

“If at all the boy is wrong, let their be public hearing, he should be charge to court and face the law, rather been taken away without a trace.

Power is transient; we must leave it either by death or at the time of expiration. Freedom.”

Another Facebook user, Arimo Sadiq Haruna, wrote, “This singular act alone is enough for me to quit this inhumane party if they didn’t release Ododo D’Flower Boiz Vanguard today.”

Double Minority: The worth of women in politics

By Ramatu Ada Ochekliye

A few days ago, I posted a new video about the worth of women, particularly in politics, leadership, and governance. It was the first vlog I had posted in a long while. I remember waking up one morning, more enraged than usual by the state of politics and governance in Nigeria, especially the way it continues to affect women.

Since 1999, when Nigeria entered this current phase of democratic rule, there had been glimmers of progress. However, between 2015 and now, those gains have not just stalled, they have reversed. There are fewer women in government across all levels today than there were a decade ago. Bills aimed at promoting gender equality and equity are consistently struck down in national and state assemblies, often without serious engagement, and enforcing religious and cultural ideologies. Something fundamental is shifting — and it is deeply troubling.

We are not just stagnant. We are moving backwards. And that backward motion is costing lives.

This regression is not theoretical. Women are no longer safe: not in homes, not in workplaces, not in transit, and not in public spaces. The rates of femicide, rape, kidnapping, “ritual killings” — which should be correctly called organ trafficking — and other forms of gender-based violence have become so commonplace that fear has been replaced by fury. Women are now more enraged at the lack of safety than they are afraid.

What is even more terrifying is the silence. Outside feminist circles and a few gender rights advocates, the national conversation does not reflect this crisis. Our representation in government is shrinking. The few women who manage to get into office are either harassed or drowned out by their male colleagues. Some are so focused on keeping their positions that they uphold the same oppressive norms we are trying to dismantle.

The country is still reeling from the alleged mistreatment of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan by the Senate President and his supporters. That incident made it painfully clear just how much of a threat a woman’s political voice still is in Nigeria.

So, I did what I could in that moment: I turned on my camera and spoke. Not just to vent, but to signal. To provoke. To inspire. I hoped that someone would hear the urgency in my voice and choose to act, not just for themselves but for all of us.

Then, I received an invitation from Daria Media to attend the premiere of Double Minority, a documentary they produced with support from the MacArthur Foundation. Daria Media is committed to development and nation-building, and they understand the role media must play in shaping governance and democracy. This documentary follows the political journeys of nine Nigerian women who contested for office during the 2023 general elections. It is directed by Kadaria Ahmed, the renowned journalist, television host, and media entrepreneur.

Of course, I accepted. Whether you call it fate, the universe, or alignment, something was pulling me back to the core of my political awakening, reminding me that anger without action is simply despair. The premiere was held on July 14, 2025, at the Shehu Musa Yar’Adua Centre in Abuja. The room was filled with people who have been walking this path for years — women in politics, civil society advocates, journalists, storytellers like me. It felt like home, even in the midst of so much collective frustration.

The keynote addresses were given by Dr. Kole Shittima, Chief Executive Officer of the MacArthur Foundation, and Babatunde Ajala, Senior Political and Economic Specialist at the Embassy of Switzerland. Their messages were clear: women are not a numerical minority in Nigeria, but they have been turned into political minorities.

Dr. Kole Shettima’s address was measured, thoughtful, but unapologetically direct. He began by reaffirming the MacArthur Foundation’s commitment to gender equity and its ongoing support for organizations like Daria Media that are working to center women in Nigeria’s democratic story.

He posed a critical question that has stuck with me since: “If you want to understand the true development indicators of a nation, look at how it treats its women.” It was a stark reminder that Gross Domestic Product (GDP) numbers and national infrastructure projects are not sufficient signs of progress. True development is reflected in the safety, participation, and dignity of women.

He highlighted a chilling trend: at the rate things are going, Nigeria may soon have no female voices representing us in international diplomacy, policy-making, or peace-building processes. Not because we lack capable women, but because the system continues to lock us out by gatekeeping, gaslighting, and grinding resistance.

He made a powerful distinction: women are not numerical minorities in Nigeria. In fact, women make up roughly half the population. We also participate heavily in the electoral process — as voters, mobilizers, volunteers, and community leaders. Yet, when it comes to leadership and representation, we are treated like a footnote. “That,” he said, “is the real crisis.”

And then came a call to action: he urged everyone in the room to support House Bill 1349, a piece of legislation aimed at expanding political opportunities for women in Nigeria. He did not mince words: it is time for less talk and more structural change. We must organize, advocate, and put pressure where it matters.

Dr. Shettima closed with hope. “I hope this evening inspires all of us — not just to feel moved, but to act. Nigeria needs to do better. And we can.”

Babatunde Ajala delivered what I would call a policy-rooted but deeply human speech. From the onset, he made it clear: the documentary we were about to watch was not just about nine women — it was about the systemic injustices women face when they attempt to engage with politics in Nigeria.

He acknowledged the double burden that women carry in political spaces — the burden of proving their competence in a male-dominated field, and the burden of surviving the social, financial, and emotional toll that comes with choosing public service. Hence the name, Double Minority.

He cited a sobering statistic: Nigeria currently ranks 178 out of 182 countries in terms of women’s participation in governance. That is not just a national embarrassment; it is a betrayal of our potential. “As the so-called Giant of Africa,” he said, “Nigeria should not be dragging its feet in gender representation. We should be leading the way.”

His speech was filled with statements that were both principled and pragmatic:
“Leadership has no gender.”

“Democratic ideals are impossible to achieve without the inclusion of all members of society.”

“When women are fully included in governance, democracy is not only strengthened — it becomes legitimate.”

What stood out most for me was his emphasis on visibility. The women featured in Double Minority, he said, are “larger than themselves.” They represent a deep yearning for inclusion, for equity, for dignity. They have challenged societal norms, endured abuse, and kept showing up — not because they had to, but because they believe in something bigger than themselves.

And in that belief, we see what true leadership looks like.

After the speeches, we watched the film.

The documentary follows nine women: Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, Senator Ireti Heebah Kingibe, Honourable Nnenna Elendu–Ukeje, Adeola Azeez, Honourable Simi Olusola, Hauwa Gambo, Honourable Khadijah Iya, Honourable M’unira Tanimu, and Joyce Daniels. These women are from all over the country — Kaduna, Abia, Edo, Ekiti, Niger, Ogun, and beyond. Despite the cultural diversity of their regions, the challenges they faced were nearly identical.

Three key themes emerged:

  1. Slut-shaming.
    Every single woman featured in the documentary was called a prostitute at some point during her campaign, for simply aspiring to public office. I have spoken about this before, but watching them share their experiences, seeing the pain in their faces and the resolve in their voices, was deeply upsetting. This is not just casual misogyny. It is systemic psychological warfare.
  2. Weaponized Poverty.
    These women wanted to serve. But the very communities they aimed to serve have been so impoverished that engagement often required cash incentives. Attending a town hall or community meeting? That requires “mobilisation money.” Refuse to give it, and you are met with hostility — even threats of violence. The desperation born of poverty makes it nearly impossible for candidates to connect with voters unless they come bearing money. Most Nigerians are simply trying to survive with the inflation we are currently dealing with. I understand it — but I hate it.
  3. The Cost of Choosing to Serve.
    Running for office in Nigeria is prohibitively expensive. Some candidates spent as much as N100 million to over N1 billion just to contest. Add the emotional toll of being harassed, isolated, and publicly maligned, and you begin to see why many qualified women simply do not bother. And due to societal constraints, most women do not have access to that kind of capital unless they are willing to compromise themselves. That is the price of admission.

I hated seeing it. I talk about these things often, but watching these stories unfold with such rawness only deepened my fury. The system is rigged. And the ripple effect of keeping women out of governance is that we, as a society, are suffering even more.

The panel discussion that followed only deepened the sense of urgency.

Honourable Nnenna Elendu–Ukeje said, “We were the ones on the screen, but each one of us represents every woman in Nigeria.” She has contested five elections — won three and lost two. But even she expressed disillusionment with a society that has become increasingly intolerant and unpatriotic. Still, her presence, her voice, her legacy — all of it has mentored countless women.

Honourable Munira Tanimu, currently in the House of Representatives from Kaduna and the North West, said bluntly, “I am tired of talking. We must walk the talk.” She made it clear that women are being kept out of politics by design. “If they really wanted to open space for us, it could be done in two days.”

Honourable Khadijah Iya, who ran for the executive office in Niger, shared that she never chose politics — politics found her. With eighteen years of experience in public service, she felt called to serve her people. But her party was not truly prepared to win. “Be careful of the party you choose,” she warned. “Some small parties will give women tickets, but they are not built to win.”

Dr. Orede emphasized strategy. “You cannot hop on one foot and hope to match the speed of someone running with both,” she said. Women must choose platforms that are serious about winning. She also warned about “professional political parties” whose only role is to keep the ruling party in power. For women to succeed, they must be clear, principled, and intentional.

By the end of that session, I felt something shift in me. It was not just rage anymore. There was also clarity.

In the video I posted, I spoke about considering politics myself. But let me be honest: I do not fit the mold. I am single. I am liberal. I am a feminist. I am an idealist. I refuse to beg for validation or marry for appearances. I will not bribe people to support me, and I will not accept abuse in exchange for power.

In Nigeria, that kind of woman is not just unpopular — she is dangerous. Already, I am slut-shamed for choosing to remain unmarried. I have no illusions about what running for office would mean. And even if I win, I could very well be harassed the same way Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan was.

But even with all that, something in me will not back down.

The premiere of Double Minority was more than a screening. It was a reckoning. It is critical in understanding the layered marginalization women face in Nigerian politics. In this context, it refers not only to the systemic exclusion of women from leadership due to gender, but also to their political minority status, despite being half the population and active participants in the electoral process. Women are sidelined both by deeply entrenched patriarchal norms and by institutional barriers that prevent them from holding power. This dual burden creates a reality where women must fight twice as hard for half the recognition, representation, or support.

This documentary reminded me — viscerally, painfully — why this fight matters. The system is rigged. The odds are high. But we are not without power.

As one speaker said, we cannot keep hopping on one foot while others sprint with both. We must stop waiting for the right time. We must act.

Women need more than encouragement. We need funding, protection, solidarity, and strategy. We need to organize around candidates, build alternative systems, and demand legislative reforms like House Bill 1349.

I may not have all the answers, and I may not know if I will ever run for office. But I know this: silence is no longer an option. Not while we are dying. Not while we are being erased. Not while democracy is being reduced to an elite boys’ club.

The fight for women in politics is not just about representation. It is about survival. And we will not stop. Not now. Not ever.

The work continues — and so do we.

Senate is bound by the order of Justice Nyako to recall Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan forthwith

Femi Falana, SAN

In a judgement delivered on July 4, 2025, Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court declared that the 6-month suspension of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan is excessive and unconstitutional. The judge equally noted that suspending a senator for six months, in a legislative calendar that only requires 181 sitting days, effectively silences a whole constituency and undermines democratic representation. Consequently, the Judge recommended to the Senate to recall her.

But in utter contempt of the decision of the Federal High Court, the Senate has stated categorically that “the Certified True Copy of the Enrolled Order did not contain any express or mandatory order directing the recall or reinstatement of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan before the expiration of her suspension.”

It is pertinent to state that since the learned trial judge made a determination that Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suspension is excessive and unconstitutional, the consequential recommendation of the court is binding on the members of the Senate. The attention of the Senate ought to be drawn to section 318 of the Constitution states that “decision means, in relation to a court, any determination of that court and includes judgement, decree, order, conviction, sentence or recommendation.”

In the case of the Peoples Redemption Party (PRP) V Ondo State Independent Electoral Commission & Ors (2018) LPELR – 44328, Ogbuiya JCA (as he then was) held thus:

“A decision of a court means ‘in relation to a court, any determination of that court and includes judgment, decree, order, conviction, sentence or recommendation’, see section 318 of the Constitution, as amended, Yusuf v. Obasanjo (2003) 15 NWLR (Pt. 843) 293; Kubor v. Dickson (2013) 4 NWLR (Pt. 1345) 534; Omisore v. Aregbesola (2015) 15 NWLR (Pt. 1482) 205. The operative word “determination”, an uncountable noun, which is not defined in section 318 of the Constitution, as amended, connotes ‘the settling of a controversy by a judicial decision; a coming to a decision'”. See Omisore v. Aregbesola (supra).”

Since Justice Nyako has settled the controversy over the legal validity of the 6-month suspension of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan by a judicial decision and advised the Senate to recall her without any conditionality, there can be no justification for treating the valid and subsisting decision of the Federal High Court with disdain. Therefore, the Senate is under a legal duty to recall the Senator in accordance with section 287(3) of the Constitution, which stipulates as follows:

“The decisions of the Federal High Court, a High Court and of all other courts established by this Constitution shall be enforced in any part of the Federation by all authorities and persons, and by other courts of law with subordinate jurisdiction to that of the Federal High Court, a High Court and those other courts, respectively.”

Finally, having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, the Senate has exposed itself to unwarranted ridicule by filing an appeal to the Court of Appeal against the advice of the Federal High Court. What is the legal basis for challenging a decision of the Federal High Court that is not binding on the Senate? Or why is the Senate praying the Court of Appeal to quash and set aside the said advice?

Femi Falana, SAN

US-based Nigerian Professor Farooq Kperogi alleges Aisha Buhari and late President Buhari divorced before his death

A professor of journalism at Kennesaw State University in the United States and public affairs analyst, Farooq Kperogi, has revealed that Nigeria’s former First Lady, Aisha Buhari, was divorced from the late President Muhammadu Buhari before his death.

Kperogi in a post shared on his verified Facebook page on Wednesday, was addressing reports about Aisha Buhari allegedly saying that her late husband requested her to seek forgiveness from Nigerians on his behalf.

According to Kperogi, “People have been circulating a quote attributed to Aisha Buhari, claiming that Buhari asked her to seek forgiveness from Nigerians on his behalf.

 “I can’t confirm the authenticity of that claim, but what I do know is that before Buhari’s death, he and Aisha were no longer married.”

He went further to state that Aisha had already reverted to her maiden name before Buhari’s passing.

 “They had divorced, and Aisha reverted to her maiden name, Aisha Halilu.”

Backing his claim with observations, Kperogi noted, “If you paid close attention, you would notice that Aisha didn’t go to Daura when he retired to the town after leaving office. Buhari was also alone when he later relocated to Kaduna.

“In fact, when he fell ill and it was suggested that Aisha travel to London to care for him, she reportedly hesitated because she was no longer his wife. She eventually went in the last few days before he died, but only after intense persuasion.

 “Even now, during this period of mourning, she seems understandably conflicted about her role.”

The professor questioned the authenticity of the widely shared statement attributed to Aisha, expressing scepticism.

“So, I’m genuinely curious to know when and where Buhari told her to beg Nigerians for forgiveness. Where did she even say this?” he asked.

His claims come a day after Buhari was laid to rest in his country home at Daura, Katsina State.

Aisha was also present at the burial, visibly grief-stricken as she received comfort from several dignitaries at the event, including First Lady Oluremi Tinubu.

According to publicly available records, Aisha married Buhari on December 2, 1989. The couple had five children together.

In September 2019, SaharaReporters, citing Daily Trust, reported that Aisha Buhari had been out of Nigeria for about two months, sparking concerns within the Presidential Villa.

According to the newspaper, multiple sources at the Villa revealed that the First Lady left the country in protest over “certain developments” within the presidency.

She reportedly departed Nigeria for Saudi Arabia to perform the Hajj pilgrimage but did not return with the other pilgrims. Credible sources said that after completing the pilgrimage, she proceeded to London and remained there.

Death Of A Merchant Of Death: The exit of a tragedy

By Emmanuel Ogebe, Esq.

The passing of ex-Nigerian dictator and subsequent autocrat Gen. Muhammadu Buhari was not so much a tragic exit as it is the exit of a tragedy.

The man who had more access to Nigeria’s wealth than anyone alive, first as oil minister in the ‘70s, then as military ruler in the ‘80s, then as Petroleum Trust Fund chief in the ‘90s and then again twice as president and oil minister for two terms in the last decade, died in a London hospital this week.

There was no hospital worthy in the country he misruled for 10 years to spend his final months on earth, notwithstanding that he knew he was ill when he was in office and had power to fix that. That’s the irony (not tragedy) of his exit.

Gen Buhari is the first ex-Nigerian dictator to die out of office. The nationwide reaction is pregnant with meaning for all the others. Even Kano that mourned the death of the most brutal dictator Gen. Abacha, the only one to die of natural causes in office, celebrated the demise of Buhari. It was truly the exit of a tragedy.

Buhari borrowed $4Billion to build a railway from Kano and Katsina to the nation of Niger where his father is from and arrogantly declared to us that those are his cousins so therefore! Yet even Kano is not impressed…

Buhari was the only General in world history to “technically defeat” terrorists. Two years after he left office, current Generals say that the only way to defeat the terrorists is to build a fence along the very border he built a railway line through. Buhari was the only ruler in the world to build a cross border railway where he should have built a border wall despite known proliferation of illicit arms and terrorism ravaging his nation.

Buhari was Nigeria’s worst ruler and second worst ruler. He also had the dubious distinction of simultaneously being Nigeria’s worst military ruler and worst civilian ruler. While a worse civilian ruler is conceivable, indeed likely, in the fetid fecundity of failure masquerading as leadership in Nigeria, no one will have the combined dishonors that Buhari achieved. The only question was which was worse – his dictatorship or autocracy?

Undoubtedly to me, his second coming was the bigger disaster. As dictator, he never arrested a judge but as autocrat he arrested several including justices of the Supreme Court.

As dictator, he retired judges believed to have compromised in political cases in the 1983 elections but as autocrat he dismissed the Chief Justice of Nigeria who he couldn’t compromise for his political cases in the 2019 elections – or who was the first southern Christian CJN in three decades – or both! This is why in my petition to the National Judicial Council, I labeled him the worst enemy of the Nigerian judiciary in history.

He subsequently installed a morally, intellectually, mentally and academically bankrupt stooge as CJN in a judicial coup against the third branch of government. His usurper was so terrible that the Supreme Court justices revolted after Hon Justice Ejembi Eko JSC publicly called for a corruption investigation into its finances from the bench to his face. Buhari the worst president of Nigeria had to remove the worst Chief Justice of Nigeria who he himself had illegally appointed!

Buhari had already practically overthrown his able deputy, and certainly the most erudite individual to ever come within close shot of the presidency, VP Prof Yemi Osibanjo, thus self-sabotaging his administration and any last hope of salvaging his legacy via succession. The fact of the matter is Buhari was nothing and nobody without Tunde and Yemi the two Yoruba men of intellect and integrity he was privileged to have as deputy.

If success is succession, as it is said, then Buhari failed woefully even in that because there is no doubt things would have been different now under Osinbajo. Rather, Nigeria is like the U.S. where a former state attorney general and VP was supplanted by the opposite.

There are not enough letters in the alphabet to do justice to the apocalyptic cataclysm that the unmitigated Buhari disaster was but suffice it to say that had the Buhari of ‘83 seen the Buhari of 2019, he would have overthrown himself!

As my learned colleague Tony Nnadi, Esq. aptly posted online, “When in 1983, Buhari overthrew Shagari,one of the reasons offered was that our Hospitals have been reduced to “mere Consulting Clinics”. 42yrs after, same Hospitals are now Morgues as Buhari, Abdusalam & Tinubu hop to London, to be treated by Nigerian Drs who fled Nigeria.” That’s the irony of his exit.

While the consensus is that his death could not have been too soon, sadly even in death, his legacy of death and destruction lives on.

Buhari single-handedly mass weaponized Nigeria’s elections. In 2011, post-election violence notably in the 12 sharia states of the north destroyed 700 churches in 48hrs with over 1000 lives lost in the single deadliest attack on Christendom in contemporary world history. My fact-finding tour of northern Nigeria discovered operational similarities, modalities and methodologies between Buharists and Boko Haram terrorists who incidentally had nominated him as their representative in negotiations with the Federal Government.

Our investigations show that like Trump’s Jan 6 insurrectionists, upon ascending power, Buhari freed his followers who had been incarcerated for post-election violence.

By the 2015 elections, Buhari who had illegally solicited millions of dollars in cash from Saudi Arabia and Libya for his serial campaign war chest (which he reportedly filched) switched tactics and mobilized killer Fulani militia from the West African sub region into Nigeria for violent takeover. When President Jonathan peacefully conceded after our pre-election threat assessment showed massive security vulnerabilities amidst violence build up, his imported bush army were denied their violent attack. As a prominent Fulani security official now in government explained, Fulanis were killing Nigerians because they were angry that Buhari had not kept his promise to them.

Troops killed 6,260 terrorists nationwide in the past two years per Army DHQ. From May 29, 2023 to May 2025, at least 6,896 people were killed in Fulani attacks across Benue per Amnesty International.

Fulani Terrorists killed more citizens in Benue state alone in two years than the entire number of terrorists Nigeria killed in the whole country. We’re losing the war Buhari bequeathed us.

For illustration just look at the Yelewata massacre. Two policemen were killed, 200+ Benue villagers and one Fulani attacker died. The war isn’t going well especially as these fatalities are comparable to the full-fledged aerial war between two nations Israel and Iran.

After the same Friday of the Yelewata massacre, 24 Israelis were  killed by Iranian missile attacks and 224 Iranians by Israeli plane bombardment.

Not only was the one night fatality in the single Benue state attack equal to the one week war between two nations but Israel’s casualty is 10% of Iran’s showing clearly who has the military advantage. The terrorists’ casualty in the Yelewata massacre was less than 0.1% and Nigeria 99.9%! We’ve been ‘technically defeated.’ This is an exit of a tragedy but not an end of his tragedies…

Buhari fought me. He forgot he would unfailingly lose power like before. That’s the tragedy that he never learnt anything. He was so dull that even past experience wasn’t a good enough teacher.

Some years ago, my defamation suit against the Buhari government discovered a secret memo proving that I was being elaborately and deliberately targeted by the Nigerian embassy in USA for my human rights advocacy.
The Nigerian embassy in Washington at the highest levels authorized my punishment and silencing for/from speaking in “Congress,” saying specifically, ”Mr. Ogebe derives pleasure from trash-talking Nigeria on social media, in the Chambers of the United States Congress and other public places across the United States.”

More worrisome, the Charge d’ affaires (Acting Ambassador) of Nigeria Hakeem Balogun made the following chilling request, “Going forward, to prevent Mr. Ogebe, who is a Nigerian citizen, from making further derogatory comments that are inimical to the image of Nigeria, Government may consider taking punitive action against him, including withdrawal of his privilege to carry a Nigerian passport.”

This was a criminal offense and conduct incongruent with their diplomatic status.

18 USC 1505 provides in pertinent part that, “Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede . . . the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress— Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.” “

The U.S. did nothing over this violation of U.S. and international law due to diplomatic immunity and disinterest but famed human rights icon Femi Falana sued Buhari on my behalf to prevent the revocation of my citizenship which also violates Nigerian law.

My case is an interesting metaphor of Buhari and Nigeria – that the son of a Fulani from the country of Niger who imported foreign Fulanis to kill Nigerians and landgrab despite all the opportunities Nigeria blessed and accommodated him with attempted to revoke the citizenship of an indigenous Nigerian who dared to help victims of the atrocities of his kinsmen.

Buhari was the most traitorous, treacherous and treasonous ruler Nigeria has ever had. Putin imports foreigners to fight his enemies abroad. Buhari imports foreigners to fight his people at home.

All said and done, aside from his merchandising his country for a mess of pottage in the Middle East, Buhari did worse by selling out our very lands and forest to his nomadic marauders and murderers who now hold us to ransom. And this is why, far from being a patriot, he was a tragedy and a merchant of death upon deaths. Like Nigeria’s most brutal dictator before him, Buhari has sustained the tradition that the only fleeting joy Nigeria’s misrulers give the people is demise.

Nigeria is just a health insurance and wealth assurance card to them. Within less than two years out of power, he was terminally hospitalized. That’s all power was for – he, his cousins and cows.

As Rinu Oduala aptly posited online: “In 1984, Buhari had Umaru Dikko kidnapped from London in a crate labeled as a diplomatic bag. Guess who’s returning to Nigeria in a crate from London 41 years later?” The very passport they plotted to deny me of, he’s not using in a cargo bin.

As one of only two men to rule Nigeria twice, Buhari still acquitted himself discreditably. Obasanjo handed over twice, Buhari was kicked out once. One would have expected him better than anyone else to understand the transience and limits of power. This is why he was doubtless the most asinine person in Nigeria’s presidency ever whose own wife he termed “opposition” and became Nigeria’s only “Internationally Displaced Person” IDP First Lady fleeing his wretched misgovernance.

But it’s not just that he couldn’t even govern his own household within Aso rock and that he and his wife mocked each other globally on the world stage. The world itself recognizes he was an abject and irredeemable failure and that’s why like his first stint in power, he crawled back under the rock he crept to while Obasanjo resumed his role as super statesman globetrotting world summits instead of hospitals.

“Merchant of death” is a mercenary or drug dealer. Buhari fit both bills. Fulani nationwide kidnap is a drug that Nigeria claims Nigerians lives now daily comprising much of the 612,000 lives lost last year.

Until our forests are freed and our farmlands safe again, Nigeria is a glorified grazing area for the merchant of death and his kin – even after the exit of the tragedy.

Emmanuel Ogebe Esq is a Washington-based international human rights lawyer and Nigerian pro-democracy champion.

The views expressed by contributors are strictly personal and not of Law & Society Magazine.

Nurse gets four-year-ban for paying patient $3,000 to cut off ex-boyfriend’s penis, tongue

A Nurse, Karenjeet Warburton, has been banned for four years for paying a patient $3,000 to cut her ex-lover’s penis and tongue off and also burn his face with acid in Australia, Daily Mail reports.

Warburton had dated her ex-lover, a senior Queensland Police Inspector, Don McKay, between March 2020 and early 2021.

According to the Daily Mail, the decision was published last week after it was handed down to Karenjeet Kaur Warburton in March by the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal.

Tribunal member Julie Dick heard Warburton had approached a patient she thought “might be up for” severely injuring her former boyfriend, senior Queensland Police Inspector Don McKay.

She gave the patient, Andrew Bown, photos of the inspector and his home between April 1 and October 6, 2021, and handed over $3,000 for the proposed hit.

“She had paid a significant amount and offered an even more significant amount to the proposed assailant,”Ms Dick wrote in the tribunal decision.

“Warburton instructed a law enforcement participant to have Insp McKay’s ‘penis and tongue cut off, his face burnt with acid, his spine to be severed with a knife for the purpose of causing paralysis, or to break every bone in his body so that he could no longer walk or talk.”

Ms Dick noted that Warburton’s efforts only stopped when she was arrested.

She pleaded guilty to one count of attempting to procure grievous bodily harm and one count of attempting to procure a malicious act with intent and was sentenced to five years behind bars, to be suspended after 16 months.

When facing the health tribunal, the former nurse did not contest claims that she had committed professional misconduct by asking a patient to carry out her dirty work.

The tribunal banned Warburton from working in healthcare for four years, which included time she had already served behind bars.

“It is unfortunate that this serious behaviour has led to the respondent being in the difficult circumstances in which she now finds herself,” Ms Dick wrote in her ruling.

“The tribunal is aware she will have to reapply for registration.

“Upon doing so, she will be confronted with having no recency of practice and there will be other steps that she might have to take.”

Bown was charged with committing arson, attempting to procure a person to do grievous bodily harm to another person and possessing a dangerous item to assist another person in committing a crime.

He was sentenced to three-and-a-half years behind bars for his part in the plot by the Cairns District Court in November 2022.

New wig clinches five awards at Call to Bar

The 2025 Call to Bar ceremony saw Miss Daniella Okangba, a 2023 Law graduate of Babcock University, emerge as one of the most outstanding new wigs at this year’s event, with her clinching five prestigious awards, including the coveted third prize for Best Overall student, in Abuja.

This year’s Call to Bar ceremony was historic, with 5,728 new lawyers, the largest cohort in Nigeria’s legal history, officially joining the profession.

Okangba, who graduated with First Class Honours, received the following awards: Justice Olujide Shomolu Award for Best Student in Civil Litigation, Mr. D. D. Dodo award for Best Female Student in Civil Litigation, Hon. Justice Aloma Mariam Mukhtar award for Best Female Student in Civil Litigation, Chief T.O.S. Benson award for Best Student of the Year (3rd Prize) and prize for First Class students.

She expressed excitement about her achievement, saying: “It has been my goal for a long time, and now it’s my reality. I worked consistently and with purpose. I believe excellence is possible with the right mindset and God’s help.”

Her disciplined academic strategy included structured daily study, regular group sessions, and Sabbath rest in line with her Seventh-Day Adventist faith.” I was determined to remain a best graduating student,” she noted, recalling her prior top honours at Babcock. “Once a BGS, always a BGS.”

She credited Babcock’s Faculty of Law for laying the groundwork for her success.

According to her, “Babcock was foundational. The faculty’s support, especially from Prof. Dorcas Odunaoke and Prof. Olanrewaju, kept us encouraged throughout Law School. Most of the curriculum prepared us directly for what we faced at the Law School.”

Currently working at a top-tier corporate law firm, Banwo & Ighodalo, Okangba has set her sights on an ambitious future. Her plans include postgraduate studies at an Ivy League university, becoming a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, entering academia and possibly politics. ” They call me Prof. SAN,” she noted, adding that by God’s grace, that will become a reality.

She advised aspiring lawyers to set their minds to it, trust God and work relentlessly.

“The word impossible doesn’t exist.”

Babcock University’s President/Vice-Chancellor, Prof. Ademola Tayo, expressed immense pride, saying: “Daniella and nine others have brought great honour to our university. This is just the beginning of greater things to come.”

Thisday

TIPS