Home Blog Page 262

Mindset/Success: How we perceive success in life

By Richard Odusanya

The Power of Mindset in Achieving Success
Our thoughts shape our feelings, and our feelings influence our actions. This
fundamental principle highlights the crucial role of mindset in defining our
personality and determining our responses to life’s experiences. A mindset is not
just a passive outlook; it’s an active force that influences our perceptions, emotions,
and behaviors.

Growth Mindset vs. Fixed Mindset
A growth mindset, where abilities are seen as developable through effort, fosters
resilience, learning from mistakes, and a willingness to embrace challenges. This
mindset is essential for achieving success, as it allows us to adapt, learn, and grow
from our experiences. On the other hand, a fixed mindset can hinder growth and
limit potential by avoiding challenges and fearing failure.

The Impact of Mindset on Success
Success is not just about achieving our goals; it’s also about how we perceive and
respond to setbacks. Those with a growth mindset understand that mistakes are an
inevitable part of the learning process and are not paralyzed by fear of failure.
Instead, they pivot, learn, and persist, often outweighing raw brilliance with their
resilience.

Embracing Imperfection and Navigating Setbacks
The path to success is rarely linear, and embracing imperfection is a sign of maturity,
not weakness. Developing the ability to bounce back from failures and setbacks is
crucial, using them as opportunities to reflect on strategies and approaches. By
doing so, we can learn from our mistakes and grow both personally and
professionally.

The Importance of Perspective
Our perception of success is often skewed, leading us to believe it’s synonymous
with flawless execution and a perfectly curated image. However, the reality is that
success involves embracing imperfection, navigating setbacks, and persisting
through challenges.

Inspirational Leadership
Sir Winston Churchill’s quote, “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is courage to
continue that counts,” reminds us that success is not a destination but a journey. It
takes courage to keep moving forward, even when faced with setbacks and
challenges.

Conclusion
Ultimately, our mindset determines our success. By adopting a growth mindset,
embracing imperfection, and developing resilience, we can overcome obstacles and
achieve our goals. As we continue to learn and grow, we’ll find that our perception of
success shifts, and we’ll become more comfortable with being uncomfortable – a
hallmark of true success.

Some notable points to consider
-Key Takeaways:
a) Growth Mindset: Essential for achieving success and adapting to challenges.
b) Embracing Imperfection:A sign of maturity, not weakness.
c) Resilience:More important than talent in navigating setbacks.
d) Perspective: Success involves imperfections, setbacks, and persistence

Richard Odusanya, [email protected]

Click on the link below to join our WhatsApp Channel. https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaL4J8rIt5rxOV1Ckl2B

Report reveals how NNPCL GCEO, Ojulari allegedly appointed some ladies covertly, to run the corporate affairs dept.

As the wasteful and scandalous jamboree organised by the management of the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL),, tagged: “Kigali retreat” for which five private jets were chartered is still generating a buzz, Mr Bayo Ojulari, the Group Chief Executive Officer (GCEO) has again ireportedly introduced a strange dimension into the administration of the company. This is according to a report by Forefront News.

The development, already creating ripples within the national oil company, followed the quiet appointments of some ladies to fill the vacancy [and create another office] occasioned by the exit of the immediate past Chief Corporate Communications Officer (CCCO), Mr Femi Soneye.

Insider sources hinted that Soneye’s sudden departure was not well received by most of the company’s top management staff members, who appreciated how the veteran journalist stabilised the management of information in and around the company’s public image.

A report by Forefront News said that Mr Ojulari, the NNPCL GCEO, on assumption of duties, started dismembering some departments and reducing them just to create room for some ladies he wanted to bring into the Company [from his former company-Shell].

Also, Ojulari, who has refused to appear before the Senate, which is probing an alleged missing $210 trillion as captured in the company’s audited statement, may have to contend with how to explain a brewing fresh scandal involving about 20 million dollars hovering around the oil company, and which might be difficult for the officer involved to wriggle out of.

The new GCEO, it was gathered, deliberately balkanised the Corporate Communications department in order to engage Adaobi Oniwinde as Acting Chief Corporate Communication Officer/Spokesperson and Ms Morenike Adewunmi as the Chief Relationship and Stakeholders Officer without following laid down process.

As a result of the shoddy nature of the appointment of the two ladies, the NNPC Ltd, afraid of possible backlash from the public and discomfort over Ojulari’s action, has not been able to officially announce the appointments just as none of the two ladies has so far been able to sign any official statements on behalf of the Company.

Forefront News further gathered that the appointments of the two ladies considered to be close friends of Ojulari formed part of the antagonism meted out to the former Chief Corporate Communications Officer, Mr. Femi Soneye in order to force him out of the company, but the American-trained journalist and Public Relations expert, opted to leave quietly in the overall interest of protecting the corporate image of the NNPCL.

A dependable source in the oil firm confided in Forefront News that Ojulari prefers having ladies as his right-hand persons, given his belief that they are better at keeping and protecting his official secrets.

It was also gathered that the Presidency has not been pleased with what is considered the forced resignation of Mr Soneye because Ojulari was advised against touching him owing to his versatile and engaging contacts needed in Public Relations by the NNPC Ltd at this point in time.

A top management staff member of the NNPC Ltd confided in Forefront News that Ojulari merely used Soneye as the fallback guy having acted against advice not to charter five private jets to Kigali which leaked and found its way to the media space.

According to the source, “Ojulari believed even though wrongly that the former Chief Corporate Communications Officer ought to have stopped the story from getting to the media.

“However, knowing this NNPC Ltd, that is quite a difficult task to achieve because there are too many interests involved.

“You can now see how negative stories about the company have become a routine since the exit of Soneye. I think the GCEO must have realised his folly. Unfortunately, getting the mistakes and collateral damage corrected will cost the company much.”

“Already, another financial scandal involving about 20 million dollars which is hovering around the company will soon blow open and it might be difficult for the officer involved to wriggle out of it”, our reliable source confirmed.

Source: Forefront News

Click on the link below to join our WhatsApp Channel. https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaL4J8rIt5rxOV1Ckl2B

CAC moves implementation of new fees, penalties to Sept. 1

The Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) has announced the postponement of the implementation of new fees and penalties for document downloads on its upgraded registration portal to Sept. 1.

The CAC, in a public notice released on Monday in Abuja, said the decision to delay the rollout followed transitional challenges being experienced by users on the portal.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the enforcement, which was initially scheduled to commence on Aug. 1, affects charges for documents not downloaded within seven days of approval.

The Commission listed some encountered problems by users included difficulties with downloading documents, payment processing, post-incorporation filings for business names, and uploading of certain required documents.

“We are working tirelessly, alongside our technical partners and stakeholders, to stabilise the system without shutting down the entire portal,” the commission said.

According to CAC, the shift in date is a temporary relief aimed at supporting businesses and ensuring a seamless user experience during the transition to its Artificial Intelligence-powered platform.

The commission said the adjustment was also in response to feedback received from customers and stakeholders across the country.

“We appreciate your patience and understanding,” it stated.

NAN reports that the CAC inaugurated the new digital portal on June 30 to improve service delivery and reduce the turnaround time for business registration processes.

NAN

Click on the link below to join our WhatsApp Channel. https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaL4J8rIt5rxOV1Ckl2B

Ezeilo, SAN, disagrees with Falana, says Kemi Badenoch is right on citizenship eligibility claim

“Kemi Badenoch: A Broken Clock is Right Twice a Day,” Joy Ezeilo, SAN, Law teacher and Senior Advocate of Nigeria, began in an X (formerly Twitter) post.

Despite opinions to the contrary on the subject, which has dominated every news platform, the former United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on Trafficking Persons in Africa had this to say.

“The issue of citizenship in Nigeria affects all citizens, particularly women, by creating identity crises and hindering national development. The concept of “indigeneship” often limits women’s rights in both their home states and those of their husbands.

“Chapter III of the 1999 Constitution further complicates this by treating women as inferior citizens, as citizenship is primarily granted based on descent rather than place of birth, unlike in countries like the U.S.

“Section 26(2)(a) exemplifies sex discrimination by denying husbands of Nigerian women the right to citizenship by registration. 

“Kemi Badenoch’s critique of this provision is valid: it unfairly disadvantages Nigerian women with foreign spouses, violating the anti-discrimination guarantee outlined in Section 42 of the Constitution and other ratified international human rights treaties by Nigeria.

“Unfortunately, amendments proposed by the 9th National Assembly to resolve these issues failed to pass in the Constitution Review process. It’s hoped that the 10th National Assembly will grant Nigerian women equal rights to confer nationality on their foreign spouses.

“For further reading, see my article, Joy Ezeilo, “The 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the Woman Question,” published in NJR, Vol. 8, 2000/2001, pp. 161–177. Prof. Joy Ezeilo, (SAN, OON, Life Bencher)”

However, Human rights lawyer, Femi Falana, SAN, faulted the United Kingdom Conservative Party leader, Kemi Badenoch, over her claim that she cannot pass Nigerian citizenship to her children because of her gender.

During an interview with CNN’s Fareed Zakaria on Sunday, Badenoch asserted that she cannot pass on her Nigerian citizenship to her children because of her gender. She suggested that it is easier for Nigerians to acquire British citizenship than for foreigners to become Nigerians.

She said, “It’s virtually impossible, for example, to get Nigerian citizenship. I have that citizenship by virtue of my parents. I can’t give it to my children because I’m a woman.

“Yet loads of Nigerians come to the UK and stay for a relatively free period of time, acquire British citizenship. We need to stop being naive.”

Reacting in a statement issued on Monday, Falana described Badenoch’s statement as “a display of utter ignorance” and accused her of misinforming the British public to score political points.

Falana said, “In her desperate attempt to impress the British electorate, Kemi Badenoch keeps running down Nigeria.

“Contrary to her misleading claim, her children are Nigerians because she is a Nigerian. Her assertion that she cannot give Nigerian citizenship to her children because she is a woman is not in consonance with Section 25(b) and (c) of the Nigerian Constitution which provides that every person born in Nigeria after independence, either of whose parents or grandparents is a citizen of Nigeria, or any person born outside Nigeria to a Nigerian parent, is a citizen.

“Furthermore, by virtue of Section 42(2) of the Constitution, no citizen shall be subjected to any disability or deprivation merely by reason of circumstances of birth, gender, or class. Therefore, her two children are Nigerian citizens. The fact that she may not want them to claim it is irrelevant. For now, they are dual citizens of Britain and Nigeria.”

Falana also faulted her assertion that Nigerian citizenship is impossible for foreigners to obtain, noting that “Sections 26 and 27 of the Constitution clearly state that foreigners can acquire Nigerian citizenship through naturalisation or registration once they meet the legal conditions.”

He, however, acknowledged gaps in the law, saying that “A woman married to a Nigerian man can be registered as a citizen, but the same privilege is not extended to a man married to a Nigerian woman, which reflects the patriarchal nature of the law. This should be urgently amended.”

Federal High Court begins 2025 annual vacation July 28

The Federal High Court of Nigeria (FHC) is to proceed on its 2025 annual vacation from July 28, according to the Chief Judge of the Court, Justice John Terhemba Tsoho.

In an official circular in Abuja, the Chief Judge said that the vacation is in line with the provisions of Order 46, Rule 4 (d) of the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2019.

He said that the Vacation will commence from Monday, 28 July 2025 and end on Tuesday, 16 September 2025.

According to him, formal Court sittings shall, however, resume on Wednesday, 17 September 2025.

A statement by the Director of Information of the Court, Dr Catherine Oby Christopher, on behalf of the Chief Judge, explained that the vacation is to allow judges rest and to prepare for the tasks and activities of the new legal year.

During the vacation period, the three core Divisions of the court, Abuja, Lagos and Port-Harcourt Judicial Divisions will be functional for only cases of extreme urgency.

Consequently, the litigating public will have the opportunity to approach any of the Courts located nearest to them for their urgent matters.

According to the statement, the Abuja division of the court would be manned by Justices Emeka Nwite and Mohammed Liman as vacation Judges.

The Lagos division is to have Justices Isaac Dehinde Dipeolu and Musa Kakaki, while
Port Harcourt division would have Justices P. M. Ayua and A. T Mohammed as vacation Judges.

The Chief Judge wishes his fellow judges a pleasant vacation.

[Video] Drama as security denies Senator Natasha entry into National Assembly

A mild drama ensued at the entrance of the National Assembly on Tuesday as security personnel barred Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan from entering the complex.

The Kogi Central representative at Nigeria’s Senate, who was suspended for six months by the Senate, had vowed to resume legislative duties following a court ruling asking the Senate to recall her.

Video: Drama as security denies Natasha entry into National Assembly pic.twitter.com/yy8ubNjPFE

— Vanguard Newspapers (@vanguardngrnews) July 22, 2025

However, when her convoy arrived at the entrance, security officials denied her access. Senator Natasha, seated in a black vehicle, was stopped alongside a car ahead of her, which carried activist Aisha Yesufu.

The standoff intensified as some supporters began chanting “Push!” and tried to force their way through the security barricade.

Supreme Court affirms retrial of man sentenced to death for murder in Kano state

The Supreme Court has assented to the decision of the Court of Appeal, which ordered the retrial of a man, Yahaya Ibrahim, convicted and sentenced to death for culpable homicide by a Kano State High Court.

The apex court held that the Appeal Court sitting in Kaduna was “right in so holding and ordering that the appellant be made to face a fresh trial to offer his plea since his plea was not taken on the amended charge.”

The five-man panel of justices, in a unanimous judgment delivered by Justice Tijjani Abubakar, dismissed Yahaya’s appeal filed by his lawyer, Emmanuel Ekpenyong, seeking his discharge of the offences following the appellate court’s judgment that he was not properly arraigned.

At the High Court, Yahaya was charged alongside eight other co-accused persons on a three-count charges of conspiracy, culpable homicide punishable with death and causing hurt.

The offence is said to be contrary to Sections 221(b), and 241 of the Penal Code (cap 105) laws of Kano State of Nigeria, respectively.

In count two, Saidu Umar, Salmanu Haruna, Idris Umaru, Yahaya Ibrahim, Saleh Muazu, Umaru Abubakar, alias Mai Mota; Muazu Garba alias Kabel; Ath Sule Garba alias Alh Maza; Lawal lro, now at large, and Adamu Babare, now at large, male adults of Garin Babba Village, Garin Mallam Local Government Area of Kano State, were accused of committing the offences.

The State had alleged that the suspects, on or about Nov. 3, 2011, at Garin Babba Village, did commit culpable homicide punishable with death, in that they caused the death of Alhaji Sabo Jae by attacking him while he slept, with sticks and swords with the intention of causing his death.

The offence is said to be punishable under Section 221 of the Penal Code (Cap 105) Laws of Kano State of Nigeria, 1991.

They were also alleged to have, on or about Nov. 3, 2011, at about the same time, attacked and beaten Idris Muhammad Jae as a result of which he sustained serious injuries.

The offence is said to be contrary to Section 241 (g) of the Penal Code Cap 105) Laws of Kano State of Nigeria, 1991.

Appeal Court slams N10m fine on FRSC for seizing driver’s documents

The Owerri division of the Court of Appeal in Imo State has delivered a landmark judgment, upholding the ruling of the High Court that awarded N10 million in damages against the Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC) for unlawful harassment and seizure of vehicle documents from one Dr. Emmanuel Ugochukwu Shebbs during the COVID-19 lockdown in 2020.

The matter, which has been in the courts for over five years, arose from an incident on Bende Road in Umuahia, Abia State, when Dr. Shebbs was stopped by FRSC officers on a government-sanctioned movement day during the lockdown.

He complied with all vehicle checks and was initially cleared. The officers then allegedly demanded a bribe under the pretence of a “tip and he declined, citing that he had no cash at the time. The officers proceeded to re-inspect his vehicle and fabricated new “offences,” including claims of worn-out tyres and absence of a spare.

His driver’s licence was confiscated, and a N3,000 fine was imposed arbitrarily.

The aggrieved doctor then proceeded to file a suit before the High Court instead of paying the fine, showing his ID or making calls to enforce his fundamental human rights, because he knew that thousands of young Nigerians didn’t have the privilege of connections, and he decided to fight it.

The three-man panel of the Appellate Court, presided over by Hon. Justice Amina Audi Wambai, ruled in favour of Dr. Shebbs, affirming that the actions of FRSC officers along Bende Road, Umuahia, were illegal, abusive, and violated his fundamental rights.

The Court ruled in his favour initially awarding N30 million in damages, a sum later reviewed and upheld at N10 million by the Court of Appeal.

The Appeal Court, in its verdict, declared that FRSC officers do not have the legal right to seize a citizen’s driver’s licence, vehicle, or documents without due court process.

It ruled that such actions, when carried out without justification or charges, constitute a clear breach of constitutional rights.

“This judgment sets a solid precedent,” said Dr. Shebbs.

“It is not about the money. It is about challenging the normalisation of abuse by agencies meant to protect us, but turned against the citizens.”

Any ‘appropriate’ rites of passage for Yoruba kings?

By Suyi Ayodele

On June 24, 2025, when I wrote the column: “Recommending Oba Erediauwa to President Tinubu”, this is the response I got from one of the Benin Palace functionaries:

“Making mention of the year Oba Erediauwa reigned on the throne of his forebears is okay but making mention of the year ancestors were born, whether accurate or inaccurate, is a taboo in Benin. It’s a red flag. Thanks for espousing the past Oba’s good deeds. Thank u sir for your insight.”

How the Benin people hold on to their tradition, especially the sanctity and invincibility of the Benin throne baffles me. In my Yorubaland, it is a different ball game.

The Awujale and Paramount Ruler of Ijebuland, Oba Sikiru Kayode Adetona Ogbagba II, died on Sunday, July 13, 2025. The Awujale died? That statement itself remains eternally sacrilegious! Awujale cannot die. Oba Sikiru Kayode Adetona Ogbagba II can die and be buried, but the Awujale remains till the end of humanity!

If not for ‘civilisation’ itself, Oba Sikiru Kayode Adetona Ogbagba II cannot die or cannot be said to have died. Obas don’t die in Yorubaland. They simply go to sleep, or change form (pa ipò dà), or their pillar (pole) simply shifts (òpó yè) or goes to the rafters (oba w’ájà). Unfortunately, we are in the era of ‘civilisation’. Virtually every headline which announced the transition of the foremost traditional ruler read: “Awujale of Ijebuland, Adetona, dies at 91.”

I felt sad reading the different accounts of the passing of the Awujale on the pages of newspapers and on the internet. We know that with the advancement of social media and the rest of them, it will be difficult to keep such news from the public domain.

The feat, however, I dare say here, is doable. Anyone who doubts this can avail us with how many traditional and social media reported the transition of the Omo N’Oba N’Edo Uku Akpolokpolo Erediauwa, Oba of Benin, in 2016. It was an incident discussed in hushed tones until all the traditional rites of passage were fulfilled and the Benin Traditional Council (BTC) ‘broke’ the news to the world.

Let me quickly make these two confessions. I am an unapologetic purist on matters of Yoruba tradition. I also subscribe, and very strongly too, to Yoruba cultural Renaissance.

I make no bones about these two attitudes. My calling as a Christian has no influence whatsoever on these two stances. Any confusion? Can I lay claim to Yoruba tradition and still profess Christianity? My answer is as written in the Holy Writ: Mark 12:17. Check it out.

Nature has been very kind to me. It allowed me to spend a good number of my formative years in the countryside. I witnessed a lot of events far above my age almost from my cradle. I was also inquisitive as a child. I asked questions and got answers to my enquiries.

Curiosity equally made me part of certain happenings as a child. I mean events that could have, if not for Providence, caused me irreparable damage. I survived the risks and learnt good lessons. I got severely reprimanded on some occasions, and appropriate propitiations had to be made to the offended quarters on several other instances. Though on the escarp of rascally tendencies, I was still within permissible limits.

The gains of those years and events are the pride I have today to be able to differentiate between tradition and fatuity; between abomination (èèwò) and ‘civilisation’ (òlàjú). I also know, with recent developments in Yorubaland, that in not too long a future, the abominations we are piling up in the name of ‘modernity’ or ‘civilisation’ would lead to the extinction of our values as a race. That day is near when the traditional values that make us descendants of Oduduwa will be no more! This is not a curse.

There are two stories about two Yoruba obas that will probably go down with me to my grave. The two obas were or are appreciably close to me. One of them now belongs to the ages and the other still on the throne of his forebears. May the King’s horse graze long (kí eshin oba je oko pé), Àse! The two stories speak to the heart of the Yoruba kingship tradition, rites of ascension and passage, and the ethos and sanctity of the crown. Pity I dare not tell them openly here!

The headline above is a poser. I add yet another one to wit: Does tradition change? Before we answer this, can we ask: What is tradition all about? The simplest definition of tradition is that it is a concept embodying the customs, beliefs, ways and communal life of a people passed or transmitted from one generation to the other. This definition, a mixture of different definitions, presupposes that tradition is sacrosanct, inviolable, constant and one that comes with repercussions when observed in the breach. No doubt, this assertion can only make sense to my fellow ‘Ara-Ilu-Oke (people from the countryside).

Let us answer the question on whether tradition changes or not. The simple response from this end is that tradition doesn’t change. What changes is the people that practise or observe any given tradition. They change as time changes.

For instance, there is a tradition that is universal to humanity, the gender tradition. Irrespective of the place of birth, a child is either given birth to as a male or a female. Why is the issue of gender generating controversy now all over the world? Or why, for example, is the African continent resisting the LGBTQ+ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer or Question+) concept?

The answer is here. The tradition of humanity is that human beings are created in the structuralist lens of binary opposition of plus (+) male and minus (-) female. Any departure from that tradition is an abnormality. While the times we are in have changed considerably, ‘civilisation’ crept in and ‘modernity’ has taken the lead in our outlook, the majority of human beings find the concept of LGBTQ+. repulsive.

This is why the today’s Yoruba modern kings and their promoters, who believe that we must mix and dilute our long-standing culture with the ‘civilisation’ of the West, ‘so as to remain relevant in the global village the world has become’, will never accept any of their children to be LGBTQ+.

Their ‘civilisation’ ends with the distortion and destruction of the African beliefs. Christianity is not an African thing. Islamic religion was a donation from the Middle East. We only embraced them and talked down on our African belief system. But when the West says a child born as a boy can decide to be a girl or combine both sexes, we shout “abomination!”

We can bury our obas in the Islamic way because the Kâbíyèsí lived and died a Muslim. A Yoruba oba can kneel before a pastor and his head anointed with oil during anointing service at a church programme because before becoming an oba, Kâbíyèsí was “a devout Christian.” We chorus ‘an oba has the right to practice any religion and be buried according to his religion’. That is ‘civilisation’; the world has changed, and we cannot live in the past, we posit in justification. Good and fine.

But the same world is also changing to accept LGBTQ+ concept. Why do we still frown at that? Why do we still hold on to the ‘old tradition’ of male and female genders? How many proponents of ‘the-world-has-moved-on’ can hold the hands of their daughters, walk down the aisle and hand her over to another girl as h(is)er wife? Before you shout èèmò (inconceivable), know that that is what Lesbianism is all about; it is the ‘civilisation’ that the world has moved into!’

As if announcing the transition of Oba Adetona on the pages of newspapers was not enough, in less than 24 hours after his departure, the oba was interred. That was strange, very much unlike Yoruba culture of obas’ rites of passage. What happens to the tradition of sitting the transited oba on his throne for some days as handed over to us by our forebears? I witnessed that with the Oba of my town and some other high chiefs in the community, including close relations who occupied esoteric titles! Maybe the Ijebu don’t have such a tradition.

Just as we were about to shout Káree Omo Kaaro oojirebi (what is this, children of Oduduwa), African Indigenous Religion (AIR) adherents, who showed up to perform the rites of passage for the transited oba were chased away by the security men deployed to prevent the ìsèse adherents from performing their rites!

The reason advanced for such a sacrilege is that Oba Adetona lived and died a Muslim and elected to be buried a Muslim in accordance with the extant laws of Ogun State which allows obas such liberty! Fine enough. But there are issues.

I have followed most of the arguments for and against what happened to the ìsèse people at the funeral of Awujale Adetona. The question I want an answer to is: at the coronation of Awujale Adetona from November 1959 to the final presentation of staff of office on January 14, 1960, did the transited monarch go through any ritual, rites and other indigenous initiation ceremonies? Kâbíyèsí Adetona Ogbagba II answered this question himself, 15 years before he departed.

Awujale Adetona wrote “Awujale: The autobiography of Alaiyeluwa Oba S. K. Adetona Ogbagba II” in 2010. The 275-page book was presented to the public on May 4, 2020. That was some 50 years and four months after Kâbíyèsí ascended the throne of Awujale of Ijebuland. The first chapter of the book is on the subhead: “The road to the coronation.”

From pages 2-24, Oba Adetona detailed the processes he went through before he was eventually crowned the Awujale on January 14, 1960. On Page 2, for instance, he wrote: “The àbídàgbà are the sons born while an Oba is on the throne and are the ones who, by Ijebu CUSTOM, can succeed to the throne as Obas. That is why certain RITUALS have to be performed for them, which involves beating the GBÈDU (royal drum). The other sons born before the oba ascends the throne DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHTS TO OBASHIP (all emphases mine).” That is the Ijebuland tradition as penned down by Oba Adetona after 50 years on the throne.

The only occasion, Oba Adetona recalled that something outside the Ijebu “CUSTOM” was observed in the installation of an Awujale was on page 4, where he told the story of how in 1915, a certain prince, Adekoya Ogbérégedè, a.k.a. Eleruja, usurped the throne by chasing Oba Ademolu Fesogboye from the palace just after three months of Fesogboye’s installation.

To regain the throne, Awujale Fesogboye and other Ijebu elites, Oba Adetona recalled, “ran to Reverend James Johnson (aka holy Johnson) in Lagos to intervene with the colonial authorities…Reverend Johnson agreed to intercede only on two conditions however -one, that Ademolu, who was a Muslim would convert to Christianity; and two, that he must agree to be anointed at his coronation.” The narrator said that the conditions were met and Oba Ademolu was reinstated nine months later in 1916, and he reigned from that date to 1925 when he joined his ancestors.

The more detailed rites of ascension for Awujale Adetona are contained on pages 20-24 of the book. The last paragraph of page 20 states how “the Odis (ààfin attendants) embarked on the various rituals that would lead to my installation as Awujale of Ijebuland…”. He went ahead on page 21 to cast aspersions on the “rituals”.

Some of which he noted were shrouded in “secrecy” to “extort money from the public, just as their fathers did before them”, as “they DELIBERATELY made the RITUALS look very mysterious…”

The concluding sentences of this paragraph, especially when he submitted “…people themselves should be creating the traditions and customs according to their needs”, betray the author’s bias against the TRADITION and CUSTOM which gave him the throne he occupied for 65 years These opinions he expressed after 50 years on the throne and all the controversies surrounding his preference for Islamic religion above the TRADITION and CUSTOM that enthroned him make the whole idea a huge suspect.

But the opinions above notwithstanding, Awujale Adetona, on pages 22-24 gave graphic details of all the RITUALS he went through, the rivers he crossed, and how he was carried on the back of the Elese of Ilese to cross the Owa Stream “as CUSTOM had (mark the tense) that my feet must not touch the water…”

However, five decades on the throne, he opted to discard the processes and at his funeral rites, those same set of people who carried him on their back to cross the Owa Stream (possibly the Ijebu stream of life) were chased away like common dirty mendicants. This is what ‘civilisation’ has done to us.

Awujale Adetona was interred in his private residence. Do the people of Ijebuland have the tradition that a new Awujale must visit the graves of his forebears at his coronation? If yes, will the gates of Awujale Adetona be opened to accommodate that rite of ascension when the time comes? Or will it be, as the monarch penned: “As far as I am concerned, I do not see any VALUE in continuing to cloak the rituals in a MYSTICAL veil?” To answer these posers, let us take a recourse to Ifa as I conclude.

There is an Odù Ifá that is the equivalent of the injunction given in Mark 12:17 by Jesus Christ. The Ifá verse is called Ogbè Móhunfólóhun (give to a man what belongs to him). When a Babalawo says: “Ohun t’Owá ni ti Owá (What belongs to Owá -king of Ilesha – is his); ohun t’Oòrè ni t’Oòrè (what belongs to Oòrè -king of Òtùn Ekiti- is his), Ogbè móhunfólóhun (Ogbè -name of the Ifá client – give to a man what belongs to him), what he is saying is as replicated by Jesus’ submission: “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.”

The message should be clear.

It’s Fake News! —IBB’s family on son’s rejection of Tinubu’s appointment

The family of a former military head of state, General Ibrahim Babangida (rtd.), has dismissed reports that their son, Muhammed Babangida, refused his appointment as Chairman of the Bank of Agriculture by President Bola Tinubu.

Lead Partner, Lambert and Curtis Nigeria Limited, Mr Determine Saka, in a statement, described the letter as fake and mischievous.

A letter, which was said to have emanated from Muhammed, noted that he declined the appointment.

The letter reads in part: “After careful reflection and consultation, I have decided, with utmost respect, to decline the appointment. This decision was not made lightly. It stems from a convergence of personal and professional considerations which, at this time, would not allow me to serve with the level of focus and commitment the position rightly demands.”

Saka, however, said: “Our attention has been drawn to a certain letter currently in circulation, indicating that Mr. Muhammed Babangida declined his appointment by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu as the Chairman of Bank of Agriculture. Not only is the letter fake but mischievous, and only the imagination of mischief makers seeking personal selfish interests over and above our collective national interest.

“Muhammed holds President Tinubu in high regards and considers the call to serve our nation a great honour, one not taken for granted.  He believes strongly in the bold reforms of Mr President, which are the hallmarks of his RENEWED HOPE AGENDA.”

TIPS