Home Blog Page 263

BREAKING!!! IBB’s son turns down Tinubu’s appointment as BOA Chair

Muhammed Babangida, the son of Nigeria’s former military president, Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida, IBB, has rejected his recent appointment by President Bola Tinubu as chairman of the Bank of Agriculture.

Muhammed made his decision known in a letter dated July 21, 2025, shared by publisher of Ovation Magazine, Dele Momodu, on Monday.

The younger Babangida said he declined the appointment due to personal and professional considerations.

The letter titled, ‘Declining Appointment as Chairman, Bank of Agriculture’, reads, “I wish to express my sincere gratitude for the honour of being considered and appointed as chairman of the Bank of Agriculture. It is a true privilege to be thought worthy of such a strategic role in advancing the nation’s agricultural and economic development.

“After careful reflection and consultation, I have decided, with utmost respect, to decline the appointment. This decision was not made lightly.

“It stems from a convergence of personal and professional considerations, which, at this time, would not allow me to serve with the level of focus and commitment the position rightly demands.

“Your Excellency, I remain fully committed to the vision of a prosperous and self-sufficient Nigeria under your leadership. I continue to hold your administration in the highest regard and stand ready to support national development in other ways where my expertise may be of service.

“Thank you once again for your confidence in me. I am deeply appreciative.”

Reacting, Momodu, who recently defected to the African Democratic Congress, ADC, from the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, wrote on Instagram:

“Well done, Muhammed, for rejecting a Greek gift.”

Recall that Muhammed Babangida was among fresh appointments by Tinubu barely two days ago.

Reacting, ADC slammed Tinubu for attempting to buy Northern Nigeria ahead of the 2027 general election.

Before you accept his proposal, By Funke Egbemode

You cannot take a maid. I cannot live with a maid. We will not employ a maid.

If the man you are considering spending the rest of your life with is a man who is allergic to maids and househelps in any form, you need to pause and take a second look at your shopping list. Are you the kind of woman who can do without a maid, run a home without help and still grow a business or career? If yes, then you are good to go. Just think it through because this is 2025. Don’t for a minute think this is a small matter.  It may look like something you can gloss over but it really isn’t. In any case, a dozen small stuff will coagulate into a ticking time bomb eventually. It is better to talk about it with him now when he is still seeing you as ‘orente’ than wait till when you are ‘after-two’ and no longer quoted on the ‘stock exchange.’

Having a maid in the house does not mean a wife is lazy. A helping hand will free up time for the couple. Imagine being able to get in the shower with your husband after a long stressful day and ‘feeding him’ right there under the steady stream of hot water before bringing him to the dining table to further feed him. Just imagine the kind of restful early night he’d have after a bowl of seafood okra and semo. That nice arrangement would have been made possible by the housekeeper who had quickly made the semo and microwaved the soup madam made over the weekend. Who sweaty, exhausted wife help?

A wife who has to rush into the kitchen to start dinner with one hand while doing laundry of the children’s school uniforms with the other is not the one you can expect full cooperation with in bed. The househelp is an important part of marriage, any modern marriage. The help could be a daily help who resumes at 7am and closes at 6pm but a man needs to support his wife with that help so his woman can perform everywhere at full installed capacity. A man who wants his wife to do everything in the house is a suspect.

A man who says you cannot work under any other but him is a man you cannot or should not trust. Don’t be taken in by his colorful proposal and the rock on his engagement ring, he is a criminal in love. Yes you will and must work under him but you must go out and earn your own money. There is nothing like a woman having her own money. Imagine getting a call that your mother had just been admitted in hospital and the hospital is insisting on N150, 000 deposit and you, a mother of two, have only 15k. And you have to wait until he returns home, showers, eats and belches loudly before you can even broach the subject! You cannot attend your school reunion because he has approved only 50k for you which barely fuels the car to the venue. You can’t help your brother with his rent or your sister with pocket money because everything is coming from Oga’s pocket. A man who does not want you to have a job most times is a man who wants to play God. He wants to isolate you so that he can strip you of your dignity and more.

I earn enough to take care of my family.

I don’t want my wife to be bossed around by another man.

Just stay home and take care of me and the children.

My sister, run o. You are about to board a one-chance bus. Tell him you love him but he will have to take his insecurities elsewhere. But there are exceptions. Some men are really that rich, so blessed they do not want their wives in small nine-to five gigs. They set them up in big businesses, allow them to travel, import and export. Those are the ones who are comfortable in their own skin. They want their women to flourish. Make sure you know what you are getting into and with who. If he is a 30 days-make-a-pay man who does not want you to work, my friend, you need to slow down and ask yourself, where will this arrangement take me to five years from now.

I know you want the soft life but soft life is really unnatural. If your marriage runs into a storm, that is when you will know that you have been swimming in a shallow pond in wet season. Once the dry season sets in, a love song can turn into a dirge. I must also add that there is a second exception to the rule especially where the man is generous. The onus is on a smart wife to know how to work from home, invest and get even stupendously rich making her money work for her.

Samuel and Toyin have had a difficult year. Indeed, as you read this, they are temporarily living apart. What happened? They have two daughters and have been married for eight years. Their two girls were delivered via Caesarian section and each birth came with complications. Samuel wants more children, at least a son. Toyin is scared to death to try again. Their second daughter is four years old and Samuel started wondering why his wife had not conceived again. Toyin is one those women who can get pregnant if her husband smiles at her long enough. It is that easy for her. It is just delivery that is rocket science.

“My husband believed that we would get a son the third time. I tried to explain to him the dangers of going under the knife a third time but he cited examples of women who have had three C.S. When I noticed he had started calculating my cycle and noting my ovulation in his private diary, I knew I had to act fast. I went see a friend who is a gynaecologist and that was how I started taking the injection twice a year. After many fights over my resistance to see the family doctor, I finally confessed that I was on contraceptive. Of course the shit hit the fan. He accused me of every sin in the book including adultery. He moved into a hotel. He will return when he has cooled off or one day we will join him in that hotel.”

Don’t you just like her confidence, her strength? She is determined both to stay alive and win her husband back, the bushman who wanted a son even at risk of becoming a widower.

These are just three of the points couples must talk about specifically and in details. Money angles, number of children and if gender will determine number. Parents must include this in their children’s upbringing and counseling as they approach marriage.. Abuse goes beyond slapping your spouse around. It is unfair to isolate a woman so you can play God in her life. It is evil to encourage another man’s daughter to keep going under the knife just so you can have a son.

Take a trip to the £3,500 (N7.1m) per day London hospital where Buhari died

An investigative report has given insight into the London Clinic, one of the United Kingdom’s most exclusive private hospitals, where Nigeria’s immediate past President,  Muhammadu Buhari, died last Sunday, July 13, 2025.

The report published by Saturday PUNCH of July 19 indicates that services at the hospital are quite expensive, with a night stay costing as much as £3,500. Using the current exchange rate of N2,053.11, this translates to N7,185,885 just for a night’s admission.

It would be recalled that Buhari, who first ruled Nigeria as Military Head of State from January 1984 to August 1985, used London hospitals for his medical care – including check-ups – when he served as democratically elected President for eight years, from May 29, 2015, to May 29, 2023.

Founded in 1932, The London Clinic is one of the largest private hospitals in the UK, best known for its expertise in cancer care, digestive health, orthopaedics, and plastic and cosmetic surgeries.

From the information on its website, the facility boasts 13 intensive care beds, 10 operating theatres, five Macmillan Cancer Support Centres, approximately 900 surgeons and physicians and attends to over 120,000 patients across the world annually.

The hospital’s areas of speciality include: cancer care, haematology, orthopaedics with a focus on spinal surgery, as well as gastroenterology, general surgery, ophthalmology, ENT, neurosurgery, robotic surgery, minimally invasive surgery, and intensive care.

The London Clinic has treated thousands of patients from around the world, among them political leaders and members of the British royal family.

In the hospital’s 2021 annual financial report, the Chairman of the Board of Trustees, Hamish Leslie Melville, said, “Our team of over 900 leading consultants, surgeons and physicians provide an extensive range of medical and surgical interventions. Our medical inpatient and outpatient treatments focus on three core areas: cancer therapies, general surgery with a focus on digestive diseases, and musculoskeletal conditions.”

Speaking with Saturday PUNCH on condition of anonymity for personal reasons, a UK-based Nigerian doctor familiar with the hospital’s operations, described it as one with advanced facilities, a high-profile clientele, and world-class medical expertise.

According to him, patients pay between £100 and £750 for consultations, depending on the complexity of their case.

The Nigerian doctor, who said he knew two fellow Nigerian doctors who once worked at the hospital, said he is aware that a Computed Tomography scan (CT Scan) at the hospital costs around £500, while major surgeries range from £10,000 to £13,000.

“In terms of accommodation, the pricing structure is also tiered. A standard room goes for £1,000 to £1,800 per night. Luxury/VIP room is between £1,800 to £2,500 per night; while the Intensive Care Unit admission costs about £3,000 to £3,500 per night,” he said.

“The clinic is known for its advanced equipment, specialist services, and highly qualified professionals. It’s a facility designed for complex and high-risk cases,” he added.

The doctor said the two respected Nigerian specialists who used to work at the hospital were an orthopaedic surgeon and a respiratory consultant.

Another UK-based Nigerian doctor told Saturday PUNCH that the hospital’s high standard of care comes at a premium.

According to the female doctor, the clinic caters mainly to the super-rich, adding that patients are charged thousands of pounds daily for specialised services, particularly in intensive care and private suites, where discretion, luxury, and top-tier medical attention are guaranteed.

“It is the best and largest private clinic in the United Kingdom. It deals with surgery, robotic surgery, ENT surgery, plastic surgery, and the best in specialised services,” she said.

She added that the hospital is equipped with advanced da Vinci Xi, ExcelsiusGPS, NAVIO robotic surgical technology, 3 T Siemens MRI, multiple CT scanners, PET-CT, ultrasound, digital mammography and other cutting-edge diagnostic systems.

In terms of staffing and expertise, the doctor said, “The clinic boasts an impressive roster of professionals with renowned specialist consultants, many of whom are Fellows of the Royal College of Surgeons and hold additional high-level certifications.”

However, according to a study by the National Institutes of Health seen by Saturday PUNCH, the cost of a bed space at the general ward is around £586.59 per bed day.

“These costs may not include other potential fees or charges associated with your specific treatment plan,” the report noted.

Speaking about its ICU, the clinic, on its website, said, “Our Standard Mortality Rate averages around 0.7 which the Critical care Peer Review states ‘would put the unit in the top 10% of the country’ and has consistently maintained low death rates all of which are reviewed at Mortality and Morbidity Meetings within the clinic.”

It added that, “Patient Experience feedback continues to demonstrate 95-100% satisfaction with their treatment across the MDT with numerous comments and compliments mentioning excellence in staff attitude, caring, compassionate, along with recognition of speciality surgical support and rehabilitation.”

Findings by Saturday PUNCH showed that The London Clinic has provisions for international patients whose treatment is sponsored by their governments, embassies, or companies.

While the Federal Government has not confirmed whether it covered the cost of Buhari’s treatment in London, the Remuneration of Former Presidents and Heads of State (and Other Ancillary Matters) Act requires the government to provide for the medical expenses of former presidents and their immediate families. This provision covers treatment both within Nigeria and, when necessary, abroad.

CAC reacts to condemnation of ineffective portal but fails to adequately address users’ concerns

Although the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) has responded to criticism about its new AI-powered registration portal, which has been plagued by technical issues and complaints from lawyers and businesses, it has failed to adequately address the concerns of users.

On Saturday, PREMIUM TIMES reported how the new AI-powered registration portal has been plagued by technical issues, causing frustration and challenges for businesses in Nigeria.

Lawyers who act as registration agents told this newspaper that the portal has been inaccessible for weeks, with customers unable to perform critical tasks, including the inability to conduct name searches, register business names, file post-incorporation documents, and submit annual returns.

The situation, they said, has also raised concerns about the ease of doing business in Nigeria, with potential investors likely to be deterred by the commission’s system issues.

They expressed frustration with the commission’s handling of the situation, citing a lack of transparency and communication about the issues and the timeline for resolution, speculating that the commission’s actions may frustrate the system and justify the proposed fee hike scheduled to take effect in August.

In a statement by its management on Sunday, CAC attributed some of the issues to glitches experienced by the National Identity Management Commission (NIMC) portal.

The commission emphasised its commitment to delivering quality service and highlighted the measures it has taken to improve the portal’s performance.

The CAC explained that it had explored an alternative technology solution to verify the myriad of data submitted along with applications due to the NIMC portal glitches.

Additionally, the commission said it has forwarded a request for additional payment gateways to the appropriate authority to ensure real-time payments without obstacles.

“It is imperative to note that the commission has a collaboration/ integration on its portal with other stakeholders for the payment of services like remita and stamp duty payments,” the statement said.

In accordance with provisions of Data Protection Act, 2023, according to the commission, its newly deployed Intelligent Companies Registration Portal (ICRP), introduced additional security checks to amongst others prevent users from surrendering their access to third parties or operating multiple suspicious accounts.

The ICRP it said requires that for each transaction with the CAC a One Time Passcode, OTP must be generated, and it goes straight to the email or phone number of the original account holder.

The commission further emphasised that the new system is cost-effective, as customers no longer lose money on checking availability, adding that the innovation has ensured that customers only proceed to payment after securing the name.

It noted that the ICRP has so far been speedily responding to applications as it now treats over 11,000 cases per day.

“Interestingly as of Friday 16 July, 8,000 name reservation requests were received and processed. This is no doubt a feat that hitherto requires a minimum of 2 weeks to complete. Worthy of note is that the commission receives a minimum of 3000 emails necessitating her automation to deliver quality service to its esteemed customers,” CAC said.

The commission said it is not unmindful of the fact that transition comes with challenges.

“With valuable feedback from stakeholders, we are sure of delivering a better-quality service. The CAC therefore wishes to state its unalloyed commitment to soon make the portal perform optimally as a champion of service delivery to the commendation of customers and stakeholders.

“The CAC had continuously pursued reforms that are customer-centric by emplacing processes and frameworks that would stand the test of time in service delivery,” the statement said.

Key concerns not addressed

CAC, in its statement, failed to adequately address the concerns of users raised in PREMIUM TIMES report, with complaints continuing to mount.

Speaking to this newspaper on Sunday evening, an Abuja-based lawyer, Yomi Ogunsanya, said the rejoinder is “very watery, and failed to address key issues, like proposed increase due by 1 August, no timeline as to when it will be concluded and become optimal, failed payments, expired availabilities etc.”

Reacting to the CAC statement on X, an X user, S.O Umar said: “The portal has not been working. Payments are not validating and previous work is inaccessible. Approval has been inconsistent and you are planning to increase the price by next month with this headache of a thing. You should test-run it properly before introducing the public.”

An X user, Eromosele Ighagbon, wrote: “In your response, you did talk about payment made and duly confirmed and receipted by remita but not recognised by your portal. This may eventually lead to loss of funds and reputation damage to accredited agents. No mention was made of your inefficient help desk.”

Another X user, Henry Imahigbe, said: “To download documents already processed is impossible with the new I-CRP. Each time I want to download it brings the 404 error message. And 7 days of grace to download is almost gone. Kindly address that aspect.”

A lawyer, Oge Obasi, said “The post incorporation portal was inaccessible for close to 2 weeks after the ICRP was launched making filing impossible. When it became accessible, users are being slammed with queries to pay penalties for late filing, caused by the inaccessible portal. This is really unfair.”

An X user, Hanif…Wali, said: “This rejoinder is vague and verbose. It doesn’t address the issues faced by legal practitioners. The issues are still unattended to.”

Toornie, an X user, wrote “You haven’t answered the many questions that were raised. Sometimes, it’s better to keep quiet than reacting in a grossly dumb way. Payments not reflecting. Approval not granted. Denials without reasons. To mention a few. People are going through it with your platform.”

Buhari: A tale of two deaths

By Lasisi Olagunju

June 2015, freshly minted President Muhammadu Buhari hosted General Olusegun Obasanjo at the Villa.

“Whatever anyone might have done to you in the past, please forgive and forget,” Obasanjo advised the new president. Buhari looked up, surprised. His countenance changed.

“Including Ibro?”

“Yes, especially Ibro,” Obasanjo answered very quickly and curtly. The two leaders exchanged glances.

Silence.

The ‘Ibro’ in that discussion is General Ibrahim Babangida. The question on whether Ibro should be forgiven was a surprise to Obasanjo because twice, Buhari was in IBB’s home seeking his endorsement ahead of the 2015 election. And his host supported him all through, publicly.

But there was no overt commitment to ‘peace’ from the new president. Old soldiers they were, host and guest quickly drifted to other issues. The meeting ended.

The event I reported above happened. It was one of the earliest signs in Nigeria’s power circle that the new man had come to power to do more than governance. I got the gist a few days after the Villa meeting. And, I asked the source what Babangida’s reaction would be if he heard that conversation. Or was he aware of it already? My source smiled and said “Of course. But, you know he is a veteran in such intrigues.”

For the eight years of Buhari, the journalist in me patiently looked forward to how he would take his pound of flesh from IBB for toppling him in 1985. I was aware that IBB also was on the alert. I was told that Buhari really wanted to take on Ibro. “He was told that he would need more than two terms to fight that war. He got the hint and backed off.” My source told me.

Babangida is very lucky to have outlived Buhari and his regime. President Shehu Shagari, the man Buhari toppled in December 1983, was not that lucky. He was president for four years and three months. He died in December 2018, right into the mouth of Buhari’s awesome powers as president. A State House press statement mourned the dead but that was where it ended. President Buhari stayed away from Shagari’s burial and made sure the dead president enjoyed no state burial. It was Buhari’s second December coup against Shagari.

Last week, Shagari’s grandson, Nura Muhammad Mahe, reacted to Buhari’s death with a caustic press release. He said the very expressive state burial honour which President Bola Tinubu gave Buhari was “in sharp contrast to how my grandfather, President Shehu Shagari, was treated during the administration of Muhammadu Buhari.” Muhammed Mahe recalled that upon Shagari’s death on 28 December, 2018, “Buhari neither attended the funeral nor approved a state burial, despite being in the country at the time.”

The man said “it was a painful experience for the Shagari family and many Nigerians who expected more honour for a man who served as Nigeria’s first Executive President…Even in death, Buhari failed to show due respect to his predecessor.”

Probably under pressure, Buhari visited the Shagari family a day after the burial and signed the condolence register. When he left, journalists who wanted to feast on what he wrote in the register met nothing in there. It was a blank page. Was that an error or a fulfillment of a pledge to dishonour the dead?

Whether you overthrew the man as IBB did, or he overthrew you as he did Shagari, he believed he was your victim and considered you an enemy till he breathed his last breath in London on Sunday. I read IBB’s beautiful tribute in honour of Buhari. The Minna-uphill General is lucky that he lived through the Buhari years. If he had gone when Buhari was president, it is almost certain that there would not have been such positive review from Daura. The Shagari treatment would be certain. It would be worse. Friends would be afraid to ‘show face’ in Minna because Mr President would have kept a register of mourners for the appropriate punishment.

Niccollo Machiavelli warns that a leader can “make mistakes of ambition and not mistakes of sloth.” Buhari made both and got away with them. Muhammadu Buhari’s engagement with Nigeria is a study in entitlement. The textbook meaning of entitlement mentality is to believe that you deserve the best from your people while giving back far less than was required of you. Buhari represented that forever in our history. And it wasn’t his fault. Very literate, knowledgeable people openly said our country owed the old soldier power; they said we owed him reverence and accolades; they put unquestioning loyalty as the icing on his cake. For 30 years, Nigerians Earnestly Yearned for Buhari. He came, and he failed. When he was exiting power, he warned us never to attempt asking him questions: “Nobody should ask me to come and give any evidence in any court, otherwise, whoever it is would be in trouble because all important things are on record.” He threatened us in January 2022, and we complied and bought padlocks for the laws he broke. Who born Nigeria and Nigerians!

The gentleman officer was a beautiful snake who carefully positioned himself as the gift the nation had been waiting for. Physician Buhari donated himself to Nigeria and the nation bled from all the orifices: from the nose, from the ear, the mouth, etc. Under his watch, life got tragically devalued. For eight years he added nothing of value to the lives of ordinary Nigerians. He instead took from many their food; and from many more their lives through unremitting insecurity. As peace progressively turned ashen, the man who swore to protect us sat back, belched, picked his busy teeth and demanded appreciation from all of us for graciously failing us. We paid him that debt of gratitude last week with the fairy tale celebration in Daura and a national holiday declared by Abuja. He was the luckiest leader the nation has ever served.

Instead of checking the dictionary meaning of inertia, just open the book of blank pages called Buhari. He was absent for eight years even for his 12 million children in the North. The North-West was healthy before he came; he left it gasping for life. Where the president’s voice was needed, Buhari planted silence and watered it with absence. He never cared; he was a leader for whom mere presence in office was enough achievement.

Everything Buhari denied others, he got from others, even when he didn’t deserve such. Tinubu gave him every support possible for him to be president and he became president. When it was Tinubu’s turn to contest for the presidency, the General he exhumed from political retirement in Daura denied him every support at his disposal. Buhari escaped every bad treatment he gave others, even when he deserved it. Apart from Sani Abacha, whom he served diligently, no other leader since 1979 got Buhari’s respect. Yet, the living among them – all of them – last week used words which you and I know were hyperbolic untruths to bury him. He was Nigeria’s most successful charmer.

Farooq Kperogi says he acted without malice, apologises to Aisha Buhari over divorce allegation

Nigeria's First Lady, Aisha Buhari.

Farooq Kperogi, a United States-based Nigerian academic and newspaper columnist, has issued an apology to former First Lady Mrs. Aisha Buhari over a controversial Facebook post in which he claimed that she had divorced her late husband, former President Muhammadu Buhari, before his demise.

In a statement posted on his official Facebook page on Sunday afternoon, Kperogi described the July 16 post titled: “Aisha Buhari, Divorce, and Forgiveness Claim” as “one of the worst and cruelest lapses of judgement” he has ever committed.

He acknowledged that the post had caused “profoundly painful consequences” for the former First Lady and those close to her.

Although he maintained that his source for the information was “unimpeachable” and stood by the accuracy of the claim, Kperogi admitted that the details were never meant for public consumption.

The statement reads:

Although I absolutely should have foreseen it, I honestly didn’t anticipate the profoundly painful consequences that my July 16 Facebook update titled “Aisha Buhari, Divorce, and Forgiveness Claim” would have on former First Lady Mrs. Aisha Buhari and people closest to her.

It’s one of the worst and cruelest lapses of judgement I have ever committed in my life, and it has been a source of unfathomable personal anguish for me these past few days.

My source, whose integrity is unimpeachable, insists the information is accurate, but never intended for it to become public. Going public with the information was an error on my part, as not every well-sourced information is for public consumption.

On the other side, Alhaji Sani Zorro, former SSA to the First Lady on Public Affairs, whom I hold in the highest esteem, has reached out to question the accuracy of my claims.

I will not contest the particulars and veracity of the information with Alhaji Sani who conveyed the former First Lady’s position that her marriage was intact. After all, as the late MKO Abiola memorably said, no one can give you a haircut in your absence.

Clearly, Mrs. Buhari herself has the ultimate authority and right to define the status of her marriage with her late husband. Her truth should be respected as supreme, whatever other facts may exist.

Moreover, the truth of this information is now far less significant than the hurt my disclosure of it has caused. I shouldn’t have shared it publicly. Period. Doing so violated every moral and ethical principle I cherish and uphold. But it shows I am only human, an imperfect human.

I realize it might be impossible for many to believe (except those who truly know me) that I acted without malice, ulterior motives, or external influence. But I sincerely did not intend to harm Mrs. Buhari or execute any personal vendetta.

To Mrs. Aisha Buhari, I offer my heartfelt and unreserved apology for the needless and deeply regrettable hurt I have caused. I am truly sorry.

Poor healthcare and how Nigerians spent over $3.6bn under Buhari annually on foreign healthcare

Nigerians spent at least $29.29bn on foreign medical expenses during the eight years of former President Muhammadu Buhari’s administration, The PUNCH reports. This translates to an annual spending of about $3.6bn during the review period.

This is according to a detailed analysis of data from the Central Bank of Nigeria’s quarterly statistical bulletins. The sum, recorded under the “Health-Related and Social Services” category, reflects cumulative outflows of foreign exchange from June 2015 to May 2023 — precisely covering the duration of Buhari’s two-term presidency, which spanned from May 29, 2015, to May 28, 2023.

The data, reviewed by a PUNCH Correspondent, shows the depth of Nigeria’s dependence on foreign healthcare services, with the CBN’s record showing a year-on-year movement of funds abroad for medical purposes amid economic downturns or dollar shortages at home.

It also highlights the irony that, despite repeated declarations by the administration to revamp the health sector and reduce capital flight, health-related foreign exchange outflows remained significant and even spiked dramatically during the latter years of Buhari’s presidency.

A close review of the spending pattern shows that the first year of Buhari’s presidency recorded the single highest amount spent on medical tourism. Between June 2015 and May 2016, Nigeria spent $7.81bn on health-related services abroad.

This figure alone accounted for over a quarter of the total medical tourism expenditure under his administration. Notably, September 2015 stood out as a month of exceptional outflow, with $3.20bn disbursed — the highest for any single month throughout the eight-year period.

That spike occurred during Buhari’s first few months in office and was followed by elevated monthly figures in October, November, and December of 2015, which further raised questions about whether the expenditure reflected a backlog of deferred medical bills or a broader trend among elites seeking healthcare abroad immediately after the administration took office.

In the subsequent year, between June 2016 and May 2017, the figure dipped to $2.76bn, although substantial sums were still recorded in months such as March 2016 ($0.96bn) and April 2016 ($0.67bn).

Spending continued to decline in Buhari’s third year in office, falling to $1.72bn between June 2017 and May 2018. By the fourth year of the first term, which ran from June 2018 to May 2019, Nigeria’s medical tourism bill had dropped sharply to just $0.44bn — the lowest across all eight years.

However, a closer examination of the second term reveals a different picture. After a relatively low fifth year, when Nigeria spent $0.92bn on medical services abroad between June 2019 and May 2020, there was a slight increase in the sixth year, with foreign exchange outflows reaching $1.57bn.

This modest recovery coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic, which imposed global travel restrictions and temporarily subdued international medical travel. The data during the lockdown period between April 2020 and June 2021 reflected lower figures, but it also hinted at pent-up demand that would soon be unleashed.

Indeed, from June 2021, medical tourism experienced a surge once again. The seventh year of Buhari’s administration — between June 2021 and May 2022 — recorded $6.96bn in health-related foreign exchange disbursements.

June 2021 alone accounted for $3.02bn, almost matching the record set back in 2015. April 2022 saw another massive jump with $1.28bn spent, suggesting that Nigerians, particularly the affluent class and public officials, resumed international travel en masse to seek healthcare that remained inaccessible or underdeveloped at home.

The eighth and final year of the administration recorded the second-highest annual expenditure, with $7.12bn spent between June 2022 and May 2023. January 2023 was a particularly costly month, accounting for $2.30bn in medical outflows — the third highest monthly figure during Buhari’s presidency.

With this late surge in medical tourism spending, the second term of Buhari’s government, which initially appeared more conservative in terms of health-related foreign exchange usage, ended up outpacing the first term.

A total of $16.56bn was spent in the second term, compared to $12.73bn in the first term. This shift suggests that, despite earlier constraints, the underlying drivers of medical tourism — including poor local healthcare infrastructure, lack of trust in domestic medical services, and the elite’s preference for foreign treatment — remained unaddressed and may have worsened.

Throughout his presidency, Buhari was frequently criticised for seeking medical care abroad. He made multiple trips to the United Kingdom for undisclosed treatments, sometimes staying for extended periods.

Buhari, during his eight-year reign, spent at least 225 days outside the country on medical trips, visiting no fewer than 40 countries since 2015. Eight months after assuming office, the former President embarked on his first medical trip to London, United Kingdom, on February 5, 2016, spending six days.

His second medical trip followed four months later, on June 6, 2016, during which he spent 10 days treating an undisclosed ear infection. On January 19, 2017, Buhari embarked on his second-longest medical trip to London, spending 50 days away.

In May of the same year, barely two months after his last trip, he returned to London for what became his longest medical stay, lasting 104 days. He did not return to the UK for medical purposes again until May 2018, when he spent four days on a follow-up review.

In March 2021, Buhari departed for London once again, on what the Presidency described as a “routine medical check-up,” which lasted 15 days. His departure came amid a labour crisis in the health sector, during which members of the Nigerian Association of Resident Doctors commenced an indefinite strike over unpaid allowances.

Almost a year later, on March 6, 2022, the ex-President travelled to London again for medical reasons. This time, he spent 12 days. On October 31, 2022, Buhari departed from Owerri, the capital of Imo State, to London for another medical check-up, which lasted approximately two weeks. He returned to the country on November 13, 2022.

Former presidential spokesman, Femi Adesina, consistently defended Buhari’s foreign medical trips, stating that he “has used the same medical team for about 40 years.” In a recent interview following Buhari’s death, Adesina argued: “If he had said I’d do my medicals in Nigeria just for show off or something, he could have long been dead.”

In total, Buhari undertook 84 trips to 40 countries during his tenure in office.

Meanwhile, the Nigerian Medical Association, the Medical and Dental Consultants’ Association of Nigeria, and the Nigerian Association of Resident Doctors earlier criticised political leaders for consistently seeking medical care abroad while neglecting the country’s healthcare system.

The President of the Nigerian Association of Resident Doctors, Dr Tope Osundara, described the trend as not only disheartening but an indictment of Nigerian leaders’ investments in the sector they are expected to strengthen.

Osundara expressed disappointment that Nigerian leaders continue to patronise foreign hospitals despite annual budget allocations to domestic medical facilities like the State House Clinic.

“It’s more like building a company, investing resources in it, then refusing to use the product and telling others to trust it. It tells you that something is fundamentally wrong with the system, with the people entrusted with managing it.

“There was a time when the former president, Muhammad Buhari, made some utterances that they should abolish this medical tourism. But unfortunately, before he died, he was even at the forefront of going abroad for treatment. Even a former Head of State, General Abdulsalami Abubakar, disclosed that he and Buhari were admitted to the same hospital in London shortly before Buhari passed away. This tells you that Nigeria’s healthcare system is in bad shape.”

On his part, the President of the Nigerian Medical Association, Prof Bala Audu, noted that while individuals are free to seek care wherever they choose, the consistent reliance of public office holders on foreign hospitals despite Nigeria’s budgetary allocations to domestic healthcare speaks volumes about misplaced priorities.

Source: PUNCH

Nigerian voters have a constitutional right to join in election petitions

By Chidi Anselm Odinkalu

“The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.”

Article 21(3), Universal Declaration of Human Rights

In April 2017, Maina Kiai changed the face of presidential elections in Kenya. He is neither a politician nor was he a candidate or aspirant seeking political office. Maina trained as a lawyer. For five years, from 2003 he Chaired Kenya’s National Human Rights Commission. In 2011, Maina became the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and Association. He held that position until 2017.

When he sued Kenya’s Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC), however, in 2016, Maina acted as an ordinary citizen asserting his rights under Kenya’s Constitution of 2010 to ask Kenya’s courts to protect the integrity of elections in his country. He had good reason to do so. Kenya’s Court of Appeal pointed out in its judgment of 7 April 2017 that “[B]ecause elections determine political winners and losers, electoral processes, from voter registration through to declaration of results, have long been targeted for manipulation and are the foremost cause of electoral conflicts. Such manipulation or, sometimes even the mere threat of it weakens public confidence in democratic processes, in the courts, security agencies, in the legislature and in the end can erode the legitimacy of governance institutions.”

In 2011, Kenya’s parliament had enacted an Elections Act. The following year, the IEBC supplemented that law with the Elections (General) Regulations. Both the principal Act and the subsidiary regulations under it provided that the results declared by at the polling unit and by  constituency officials in presidential elections were provisional and, therefore, subject to be altered or confirmed by the IEBC at final collation. Maina invited Kenya’s courts to void these provisions and pronounce them as unconstitutional because they created the loophole through which presidential election results suffered mutilation and adulteration between the polling units and final announcement by the IEBC.

Many people thought this case quite audacious on many grounds. First was that it was instigated by ordinary citizens and not by a political party or a candidate in an election. Second, the courts decided to accord the citizen litigants standing to institute the case when it may have been more convenient to throw them out on a situational jurisprudence of standing to sue. The third surprise was that first the High Court and then the Court of Appeal of Kenya upheld the case of the citizens in its entirely and granted the orders sought. In other words, it was the courts in Kenya that abolished the rigging of elections through multiple levels of collation and compelled the IEBC to ensure that the results announced at the polling units are not different from those announced at the final collation.

Five months later, in September 2017, the Supreme Court of Kenya followed through the logic of this decision and nullified the results announced by the IEBC in the presidential election which showed significant alterations and adulterations at various levels of the result management process. Four years earlier, in 2013, the Supreme Court of Kenya had upheld results which suffered similar challenges but then the rules were not as clear. Interestingly in that case, one of the petitions instituted in that year was by Gladwell Otieno, another ordinary citizen who led an organization called the Africa Organisation for Open Governance (AfriCOG).

These kinds of developments are unthinkable in election accountability and dispute resolution in Nigeria. Mind you, if the kind of decision handed down by Kenya’s Court of Appeal in 2017 in the Main Kiai case had been possible in Nigeria, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) would not have got away with the impunity of its undisguised rigging of the most recent governorship election in Edo State and the official burglarisation of that election would not have enjoyed judicial certification.

The only persons whom the courts are willing to hear in Nigeria’s elections are political parties, their candidates or INEC. Yet, the dispute in every election is over the mandate or votes of the people or the citizens. In this dispute, the courts in Nigeria routinely deny the voters any right or standing to be heard even though they are bound by the outcome. There is no lawful or constitutional basis for that jurisprudence. If anything, the constitution clearly mandates that citizens shall have the right and standing to challenge or participate in such proceedings if they choose.

This assertion has solid constitutional foundations. The judicial powers of Nigeria’s Court as established in Section 6(6)(c) of the 1999 Constitution extend explicitly to “the determination of any question as to the civil rights and obligations of that person.” Universal franchise as the foundation of the mandate to govern is a civil right and obligation of the highest constitutional salience. It is protected by the Constitution; by the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act, which is domestic law in Nigeria; and by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

As Kenya’s Court of Appeal proclaimed in 2017, “the constitution proclaims the sovereignty of the people, the supremacy of the Constitution and imposes on every person a solemn obligation to respect and defend the Constitution.” Citizens cannot fulfil or uphold this duty if judges continue in their incest with politicians which prospers from the judicially procured exclusion of the people.

The only thing that seems to confound those who oppose this point is not the soundness of its constitutional validity but the convenience of administering its logic. They seem terrified by the prospect that this is a facility that may be exercised – in presidential elections – by tens of million of persons. This is not a legal objection but a design or engineering proposition in respect of which management options have been authoritatively canvassed previously.

One approach to this is to require the INEC to first prove substantial compliance with applicable laws before a constitutional or electoral chamber in a process in which citizens can participate and contest its claims. In its 2008 report, for instance, the Electoral Reform Committee headed by former Chief Justice, Mohammed Lawal Uwais, recommended exactly this, arguing that there should be a “shift the burden of proof from the petitioners to INEC to show, on the balance of probability, that disputed elections were indeed free and fair and candidates declared winners were truly the choices of the electorate.”

Another would be to recognize that citizens or civic groups have standing in election petitions in representative or test capacity. The roll of voters for this purpose can be recognized as a class whose members share a common interest in credible elections and in results that bear fidelity to the expressed will of the people.

These pathways are not mutually exclusive. The appeal of the latter is that implementing it does not require constitutional amendment. It simply needs the courts to perform their duty of upholding the constitution in its text and structure. In doing this, as the Court of Appeal of Kenya reminds us we must be keenly aware of the need to “insulate the electoral process from the deleterious perils and malaise of opacity, corruption, crime and malpractice.” The resolution of this problem is too important a task to be abandoned to a joint enterprise of the self-same people responsible these crimes in the first place.

A lawyer and a teacher, Odinkalu can be reached at [email protected]

The views expressed by contributors are strictly personal and not of Law & Society Magazine.

More Questions trail Gospel Kinanee’s 18 years in prison as a ‘ghost’

The Nigerian Correctional Service have a statutory duty to raise alarm if anyone has been detained beyond six months without trial. It failed, too.

Saka Azimazi asks, WHERE IS JUSTICE?

The National Human Rights Commission, by several statutes and by practice, CARRY OUT prison audit EVERY YEAR. How did this escape its audit for 18 years? Where are the annual prison audit reports? What does the commission do with its report apart from awarding a contract for printing? Printing that doesn’t reach the public? Where is ACJA? Where is the Public Complaint Commission? Where is the NBA Human Rights Committee headed by a national vice president?

The Nigerian Correctional Service have a statutory duty to raise alarm if anyone has been detained beyond six months without trial. It failed, too.

Magistrates have a duty to inspect detention facilities within their territorial jurisdiction at least once every quarter.
How did we arrive at this multiple system failure? Have lawyers failed Nigeria? And failed humanity.

Alozie Echeonwu (one-time President of CLASFON, one-time member, Council of Legal Education)
Lost his liberty at 14. Perhaps he lost the opportunity to write WAEC and JAMB when his age mates did.

Besides a menial job opportunity, what is his employability?

Will a decent lady agree to marry him? What chances has he got to be accepted by a prospective father in law?

How much did the neighbours give the police to take him away ?

Shouldn’t an arresting officer answer to higher authorities to justify their actions?

Hasn’t the court system failed this citizen by remanding him for so long without concluding his trial?

How many of the magistrates who handled the matter have been elevated to the higher bench?

How much was paid to the prison officials to include his name on the list for gaol delivery this year, and why wasn’t he on the list last year ?

Doesn’t the prison system do a form of audit at least once a year?

Read Also: Gospel Kinanee finally gains freedom, reunites with family after vanishing at age 14 and being in prison for 18 years as a ‘ghost’

Gospel Kinanee finally gains freedom, reunites with family after vanishing at age 14 and being in prison for 18 years as a ‘ghost’

In a moment that brought tears to many eyes and renewed our hope in humanity, Gospel Uebari Kinanee, who had been locked away in silence and forgotten for 18 long years, has finally regained his freedom, thanks to the tireless efforts of our team at Haven360 Foundation.

We first met Gospel during one of our outreach visits in September 2024. He stood apart—not just physically, but in spirit. He barely spoke, his eyes were distant, his thoughts fragmented. But there was something in him that called out for help, for healing, for justice.

As we dug deeper, we encountered a shocking discovery: there was no record of Gospel in the prison system. No case file. No documentation. It was as if he didn’t exist. A ghost behind bars. Authorities had no answers. Prison officials could only say he had “been there for years.” How many? No one could say. Why? No one knew.

But we were determined not to leave Gospel behind.

Despite his mental condition and difficulty communicating, we pressed on—believing that no human being deserves to be abandoned and erased in such a cruel way. After months of letters, investigations, petitions, and sleepless nights, our team traced a possible lead back to a village in Ogoni, Rivers State.

And there, everything changed.

We found Gospel’s family.

His name was not a number. He had not always been lost. He had been loved.

According to his heartbroken family, Gospel went missing in 2007, when he was just 14 years old. He had been sleeping outside one night when, according to his own account in his native Ogoni language, he was forcefully taken away by a group of policemen—allegedly incited by an influential neighbour for reasons he does not understand. He remembers only waking up behind prison walls. That’s where his childhood ended. That’s where time stopped for him.

His family searched endlessly. They knocked on doors, reported to authorities, prayed, hoped, and eventually mourned him as dead—until, just two days ago, they received a call from Haven360 Foundation that Gospel was alive.

Eighteen years of silence ended in an emotional reunion.

Yesterday, 17th July, 2025, in a deeply moving session at the Goal Delivery, the Chief Judge of Rivers State formally discharged Gospel, confirming that no charge had ever existed. Gospel walked out of the prison not as a ghost, but as a man reclaiming his name, his story, his right to live.

Our foundation has not only reunited Gospel with his family but also provided financial support for their journey back home and for his resettlement. We are now working to ensure he receives the urgent medical and psychological care he needs to heal and rebuild.

This is more than a story of freedom—it’s a story of restoration, of what happens when we refuse to look away. When compassion triumphs over bureaucracy. When forgotten people are seen again.

To every member of Haven360, to every volunteer, donor, and partner—thank you You have helped change the course of one man’s life. Gospel’s journey reminds us why we do what we do: because no human being should ever be invisible.

Welcome home, Gospel.
Your name will never be forgotten again.

From The Haven360 Foundation.

TIPS