Home Blog Page 26

BOSAN grieves as renowned Silk Senator (Chief) Anthony Ademuyiwa Adeniyi, SAN passes away

Senator (Chief) Anthony Ademuyiwa Adeniyi, SAN (1951 – 2026)

The Body of Senior Advocates of Nigeria (BOSAN) announces with heavy hearts the passing of Senator (Chief) Anthony Ademuyiwa Adeniyi, SAN, an esteemed member of the Inner Bar, distinguished statesman, and accomplished legal practitioner whose life was marked by service, leadership, and dedication to nation-building.

Born on 9 May 1951, Chief Adeniyi obtained his LL.B degree from the University of Ife and was called to the Nigerian Bar in 1980. In recognition of his outstanding contributions to the legal profession and the administration of justice, he was elevated to the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria in 2021.

Throughout his illustrious career, he rendered exceptional service to the Nigerian Bar Association, serving as Publicity Secretary of the Akure Branch from 1986 to 1988, Chairman of the Branch from 1990 to 1994, and a Member of the National Executive Committee of the Nigerian Bar Association for many years. His commitment to legal education and public service also saw him serve as a Member of the Council of Legal Education and the Prerogative of Mercy Advisory Committee of Ondo State.

Beyond the legal profession, Chief Adeniyi distinguished himself in public life. He was a Delegate to the National Constitutional Conference, Chairman of Omega Bank Plc, and a Member of Vision 2010 for Ekiti State. His passion for public service culminated in his election as Senator representing Ekiti South Senatorial District in the National Assembly from 2011 to 2015, where he served with distinction on the Senate Committee on Constitutional Review and as Vice Chairman of the Senate Committee on Capital Market.

As Principal of Chief Ademuyiwa Adeniyi & Co., he built a respected legal practice and inspired many through his professionalism, integrity, and commitment to excellence. His contributions to the legal profession, democratic governance, and national development will remain enduring legacies.

BOSAN extends its heartfelt condolences to his family, friends, colleagues, associates, and the people of Ekiti State on this irreparable loss. We honour his remarkable life of service and celebrate the values he embodied throughout his distinguished career.

May Almighty God grant him eternal rest and grant his loved ones the fortitude to bear this loss.

May his memory remain a blessing. 

Follow our WhatsApp Channel

End of an Era: BOSAN pays tribute to Late Sir Chief Henry Oghogho Ogbodu, SAN (1953 – 2026)

It is with profound sadness that The Body of Senior Advocates of Nigeria (BOSAN) mourns the passing of Sir Chief Henry Oghogho Ogbodu, SAN, a distinguished legal icon and a respected member of the body who departed this life on 14 June 2026 at the age of 73.

Called to the Nigerian Bar in 1982 and elevated to the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria in 2012, Sir Chief Ogbodudistinguished himself as an accomplished legal practitioner whose career spanned over four decades of dedicated service to the legal profession and the administration of justice. He established himself as a formidable advocate and a versatile practitioner whose expertise spanned General Litigation, Corporate and Commercial law, Oil and Gas, and Constitutional and Human Rights Law, Election Petitions, Arbitration, among other fields.

Beyond his courtroom successes as the Principal Partner of H.O. Ogbodu, SAN & Co., he was a dedicated servant of the Bar and the nation. From his leadership as the Chairman of the Benin Branch of the Nigerian Bar Association to his contributions on the Edo State Criminal Justice Committee and the Justice Belgore Commission, he remained a pillar of institutional integrity. As a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, he championed the growth of alternative dispute resolution, leaving an indelible mark on the practice of law in Nigeria.

Chief Ogbodu will be remembered not only for his intellectual rigour and his service to the legal profession but also for his principled approach to his practice. His leadership and legacy of service, professionalism, and dedication to the rule of law will continue to inspire those who had the privilege to learn from his decades of distinguished practice.

BOSAN extends its heartfelt condolences to his family, colleagues, friends, and the entire legal community. We honour his remarkable legacy of professionalism, leadership, and service, and pray that his soul rests in perfect peace.

May his memory remain a blessing. 

Follow our WhatsApp Channel

BOSAN mourns loss of Markus Yarkasuwa Saleh, SAN, hails his enduring legacy

It is with profound sadness that The Body of Senior Advocates of Nigeria (BOSAN) mourns the passing of Mr. Markus Yarkasuwa Saleh, SAN, who departed this life on 18 June 2026 in Jos, Plateau State. He was a distinguished member of the Inner Bar whose life and career were dedicated to the service of justice, the legal profession, and the nation.

Called to the Nigerian Bar in 1977 and elevated to the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria in 2006, Mr. Saleh built a remarkable legal career spanning several decades. He was widely respected for his expertise in Criminal, Civil, and Constitutional Law, Electoral matters, Court-martial proceedings, Arbitration, Corporate legal ractice, and Legal aid services. Through his professional engagements, he earned a reputation for diligence, integrity, and unwavering commitment to the rule of law.

His contributions extended beyond legal practice into public service and the administration of justice. He served as a Member of the Constituent Assembly (1977–1978), contributing to the constitutional development of the nation at a pivotal period in Nigeria’s history. He further rendered invaluable service on several election and appeals tribunals, including the Governorship and Legislative Elections Tribunal in Plateau State, the Senate and House of Representatives Elections Tribunal for Kogi and Kwara States, the Plateau State Local Government Council Election Appeals Tribunal, and as Chairman of the Local Government Council Elections Appeals Tribunal in Yobe State.

As Principal Partner of M. Y. Saleh & Co., he mentored younger members of the profession and upheld the highest standards of legal practice. His enduring commitment to justice and democratic governance earned him the admiration and respect of colleagues, clients, and members of the wider legal community.

The legal profession has lost a devoted advocate, a respected jurist, and a man of exceptional character whose contributions will continue to resonate for generations to come.

BOSAN extends its deepest condolences to his family, friends, colleagues, and associates during this period of mourning. We celebrate a life well lived, a career distinguished by excellence, and a legacy defined by service to the law and humanity.

May Almighty God grant him eternal rest and comfort all those he has left behind.

May his memory remain a blessing.

Follow our WhatsApp Channel

No Tribe, No Faith, No State Spared: Rape respects federal character

  • As FIDA Nigeria seeks tougher prosecution of rapists, child abusers

Nigeria is confronting a growing sexual violence crisis that knows no ethnic, religious or geographical boundaries. Across the federation, from urban centres to remote villages, cases of rape and incest continue to surface with troubling regularity, exposing a social scourge that cuts across all states, tribes and faiths and demands urgent national attention.

This is even as he International Federation of Women Lawyers (FIDA) Nigeria has called for the swift investigation and prosecution of perpetrators of rape, domestic violence, child abuse and other crimes against women and children, warning that impunity is contributing to the persistence of gender-based violence across the country.

Addressing delegates at the opening of the organisation’s Second Quarter National Executive Council (NEC) Meeting in Abuja, Country Vice President Eliana Martins said reports of sexual assault, child marriage, harmful traditional practices and exploitation continue to emerge with alarming frequency.

She argued that while Nigeria has enacted important legal protections, including the Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Act and the Child Rights Act, inconsistent implementation and weak enforcement have limited their impact.

FIDA urged authorities to strengthen criminal investigations, ensure speedy trials and expand access to legal aid, shelters, rehabilitation services and psychosocial support for survivors.

According to Martins, justice must not only be done but be seen to be done if Nigeria hopes to deter offenders and restore public confidence in the rule of law.

Imo State

In Imo state, a 63-year-old man, Chidi Onuogu, was remanded in the Owerri Correctional Centre for allegedly defiling a 12-year-old girl on multiple occasions.

The Chief Magistrate, O.J. Uzoechi, heard the matter behind closed doors in her chambers on Thursday and described the defendant’s action as unlawful.

The suspect was arraigned on a one-count charge bordering on having unlawful carnal knowledge of a minor.

Kebbi State

The Kebbi State Police Command arrested a 36-year-old security guard attached to an Islamiyya school in Jega Local Government Area for the alleged sexual assault of a 10-year-old girl.

The state Commissioner of Police, Umar Hadejia, disclosed the arrest while briefing journalists in Birnin Kebbi on Wednesday.

According to the police chief, the suspect, identified as Faruku Muhammed, a resident of Tungar Zabarmawa in Jega, was apprehended following a complaint lodged by members of the victim’s community.

Cross River State

41-year-old Endurance Ime Sandy, was sentenced to life imprisonment by a Family Court II in Calabar after being convicted of raping an 11-year-old girl.

The presiding judge, Hon. Justice Blessings Obin Egwu, handed down the sentence, following the conclusion of a trial that lasted several months.

The judge said the convict was guilty based on evidence available and deserved no mercy.

Kwara State

The Kwara State Command of the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC), arrested a 40-year-old man, AbdulRauf Ambali, over allegations of incest, unlawful sexual intercourse with his 14-year-old biological daughter, and procurement of abortion.

The spokesperson for the command, ASC 1 Ayoola Michael Shola, who made the disclosure said the victim revealed that she had earlier fled from her father’s residence after allegedly enduring months of sexual abuse and intimidation.

According to the statement, the suspect was apprehended following credible information received from concerned members of the public in Alapa, Asa Local Government Area of Kwara State.

Read Also: Depraved Akwa Ibom pastor earns 49 years imprisonment for raping and impregnating teenage daughter

“The matter was initially reported at the Alapa Divisional Office on the 16th of June, 2026, and was subsequently transferred to the Command’s Gender Unit for comprehensive investigation,” the statement read.

“Ironically, the case was first brought to the attention of the Corps by the suspect himself, who reported that his 14 year-old daughter, had been missing from home for approximately three weeks.

“Upon receipt of the report, operatives of the Gender Unit immediately commenced investigation and successfully traced the minor.

“During the course of interviews and victim engagement, the girl disclosed that she had deliberately fled from her father’s residence after allegedly enduring months of sexual abuse and intimidation.

“Preliminary findings revealed that the victim had lived with her grandmother since childhood before being taken into her father’s custody in December 2025 under the pretext of providing parental care and support.

“The victim alleged that shortly after moving into his residence, her father began subjecting her to repeated sexual abuse.

“The minor further disclosed that she was frequently threatened, beaten, and intimidated whenever she resisted the suspect’s advances.

“According to her account, the abuse persisted until she could no longer endure the situation, prompting her to leave home without informing anyone of her whereabouts.

“Investigation further revealed that the victim allegedly became pregnant in May 2026 as a result of the repeated sexual abuse.

“Findings indicate that the suspect subsequently took the minor to a private facility where a medical examination confirmed the pregnancy.

“Further inquiries revealed that arrangements were thereafter made for the pregnancy to be terminated.

“The victim also alleged that she was repeatedly warned not to disclose the incidents to anyone and was later advised to undergo family planning measures to prevent future pregnancies.

“In the course of investigation, the suspect reportedly admitted to having unlawful sexual relations with the minor.”

Follow our WhatsApp Channel

Odinkalu Accuses Soludo Govt, COOU of ‘forum shopping’ in explosive vice-chancellor appointment dispute

Former Governing Council Chairman alleges Anambra authorities sidestepped an ongoing National Industrial Court case by securing a High Court judgment in a controversial legal battle over the university’s leadership.

Former Chairman of the Governing Council of Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University (COOU), Prof. Chidi Anselm Odinkalu, has accused the Anambra State Government and the university’s management of orchestrating a legal manoeuvre to undermine an ongoing court challenge over the appointment of the institution’s Vice-Chancellor.

Odinkalu, a former Chairman of the National Human Rights Commission, made the allegations in a strongly worded statement posted on his verified social media account, escalating the controversy surrounding the leadership tussle at the state-owned university.

The renowned legal scholar said comments recently made by the Anambra State Commissioner for Information, Dr. Law Mefor, concerning his tenure as Chairman of the university’s Governing Council relate to issues that are already the subject of litigation before the National Industrial Court of Nigeria (NICN).

According to Odinkalu, he is a defendant in the suit alongside Governor Chukwuma Soludo, the Anambra State Attorney-General, COOU and the university’s Governing Council.

He alleged that after all parties had entered appearance in the matter before the National Industrial Court, the state government and university authorities turned to an Anambra State High Court in Otuocha to obtain a judgment in proceedings he claims were designed to sidestep the pending federal case.

Odinkalu further contended that the claimant in the Otuocha suit was not an applicant for the Vice-Chancellor position and therefore lacked any direct interest in the appointment process.

“The State High Court knows the matter is not one over which it has jurisdiction,” he asserted, questioning both the legal competence of the proceedings and the speed with which the case was concluded.

He claimed the suit was instituted on September 15, 2025, with judgment delivered just 11 days later on September 26, describing the timeline as extraordinary for a matter of such significance.

“The judgment could not have been more favourable if it was written by a party to the proceedings,” Odinkalu alleged.

While expressing concern over what he characterised as an uneven legal contest, the former Governing Council chairman said he would refrain from discussing the substantive issues in greater detail out of respect for the ongoing judicial process.

He also contrasted his position with that of public officials who have commented openly on the dispute, insisting that he would reserve a fuller response until the conclusion of the court proceedings.

“At the appropriate time, I will address comprehensively the actions of those behind this controversy,” he indicated.

The latest claims add another layer to the protracted dispute over the appointment of COOU’s Vice-Chancellor—a process that has sparked litigation, political exchanges and heightened public scrutiny over governance at the institution.

As of the time of filing this report, neither the Anambra State Government nor the management of Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University had publicly responded to Odinkalu’s allegations.

Follow our WhatsApp Channel

Femicide – The destruction of the Rights of Females in Nigeria

By Añuli Aniebo

Frames of Violence

Many scholarly definitions of femicide speak to the killing of women and girls just because of their gender – being a girl or woman. Many other framings exist – Uxoricide (killing of a wife by her husband), Intimate Partner Violence (murder committed by a spouse or partner), Gendercide (deliberate killing of individuals), Honour Killing (a woman killed by members of her family). The Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and Civil Society Organisations (CSO) space, utilise this framing of femicide and limit the conceptualisation of “killing a woman’ to be a sudden or physical death often times influenced by intimate partners or family members. These definitions, in my opinion, limit the interrogation and intervention of femicide to when actual death has occurred.

The process of a girl or woman losing agency over her own life, and wellbeing be it socio- economic or otherwise, should also be framed under femicide.

Localising the Issues.

Nigeria has had varying occurrences of women and girls dying from many violence related incidents. Some of the crimes against women and girls are violently perpetuated from the onset of how social norms and cultural expectations are instituted to the level at which the reinforcement of such behaviours are policed. Women and girls grow up in a system that ensures agency is very controlled under watchful lenses.

When a woman loses her life, even in death, she is still questioned by society. Women and girls are still vilified and shamed for losing their lives in the hands of violence. Violence apologists will still find reasons to shame and blame the woman for the inability to remain alive. Women are killed across religion, socio-economic status, educational achievements, and suffer discrimination across political, legal, cultural and economic intersections and my opinion stands strong to posit that femicide is not just the act of an eventual death. Femicide is the way women and girls are still violently controlled by institutions and systems of power that are structurally created to enable violence.

Who is Guilty?

I ask, what exactly is the justification for killing a woman in our society? Is it because she is a woman? Or is there more than meets the eye?. NONE is the answer yet in analysing the most recent killing of a young woman in the hands of her intimate partner, investigations allude to the fact that the man killed the woman due to economic reasons. In a society where the obedience to social norms is highly expected- women to marry men, and men to provide financially and protect the home- the binary outcomes experienced in the society is that men are always seeking to provide and using any means necessary to be financially able for example, through fraud or “yahoo yahoo” (diabolical means of get rich quick schemes). Women are pressured to marry and “settle” down to meet acceptability standards and in the process, get entangled with some unforeseen and manipulative connections. In this case, the man used his power and influence over a vulnerable woman with the intent to be financially successful. He killed because of his greed and manipulative intentions. The deceased and the perpetrator are entangled in a web of achieving societal expectations however, the victim did not deserve this sudden loss of life.

Women and girls always live in constant fear – protect themselves, remain vigilant, dress careful, controlled, and yet still face vilification, shaming, commodification, oppression, and blamed if or when an act of violence is perpetuated against her. The most recent evidence of an 18-year-old young woman brutally beaten and constantly violated by her partner, confirms the very present and looming danger of femicide despite the interventions of rescue. Culture still has a huge influence on how many violent incidences is normalised, prevented or resolved. The perpetrator should have been arrested as the evidence was glaringly obvious, rather, he was let to be in a space with the 18-year-old, a situation that still permeates violence in my opinion. This situation has been structurally re-defined across some international spaces and in other countries that are deliberate in protecting the lives of vulnerable members. When anyone notices an act of violence on another, the permission of the victim is not sought for protection, the law and systems authorise that a “bystander” intervention takes precedence and activates a system of protection. The State takes over swiftly. Many women continue to be apologists to what other women experience either through learned helplessness, living in denial, ‘minding my business’ ideology or false support usually created and normalised by some mindsets that encourage and normalise their own oppressive ideologies.

Re-thinking Safety

Can society call out the root causes of injustices that women and girls face from the system that is strongly patriarchal, hegemonic and structurally violent? I interrogate this and see femicide as the dying of a woman’s body, soul, spirit and purpose on a daily when violence is instituted and reinforced as a norm in our society. Femicide is the silencing of voices of victims by systems of power that should protect and prevent. Femicide occurs daily in our society and requires a re-imagining and re-addressing of our understanding to enable a more sustainable curb on this crime.

I lean into the article by Nadera Shalhoub – Kevorkian to reconstruct the conceptualisation of this definition of femicide. I advocate that femicide should be described as death even while still breathing. The scope should be expanded and the interventions that should prevent and protect, be refined to keep our girls and women safe from all forms of violence.

Añuli Aniebo. Gender and Inclusion in Practice | ED, HEIR Women Hub

Follow our WhatsApp Channel

When will the vote seller stop cheating himself? By Funke Egbemode

Election is a one-day festival. It is a day that most times ends so fast you wonder if it has 24 hours like other days. And when it disappears, it takes the rice, noodles, ankara and the cash with it. It is like the Masquerade Festival of the Big Ancestors in my hometown. The horned, fire-bearing masquerades like Lobanika and Madigbolesu visit the earth once in three years. Election day is the shortest of days. It comes quickly and vanishes before many realise it has arrived. As Shakespeare observed, the hours are swift as they fly.

What happens on election day is almost like what I see at Oja Obada, my hometown’s weekly market. But this one is a strange market. It springs to life every election season in Nigeria. It has no permanent stalls, no signposts and no opening bell. Yet business booms. Buyers arrive with bags of rice, cartons of noodles, wrappers, cash and promises wrapped in bright smiles. Sellers come with their future and conscience, something far more valuable than gold, their votes.

This is perhaps the only market in the world, where people willingly exchange four years of their future for a meal that disappears in two days or a few crisp naira notes that vanish before the week ends.

Every election season, we rain curses on vote buyers. We call them enemies of democracy. We accuse them of corrupting the electoral process. We are right.

But permit me to ask a rather uncomfortable, unpopular question.

When will the vote sellers stop cheating themselves? Because every politician who buys a vote is helped by a citizen willing to sell one.

See Mama Bose now.

She is a widow who has struggled all year to keep body and soul together. Food prices have climbed far out of reach. Her little roadside booking and epa (roasted plantain and groundnut) business hardly pays the bills. Indeed, she is hiding from two loan sharks. Then election week arrived like Christmas. Suddenly, strange faces began visiting the neighbourhood. One brought bags of rice. Another added N10,000 per voter and PVC. A third threw in six yards of ‘small ankara’.

‘Vote and cook soup.’

Each party ‘leader’ shouted like a Lagos bus conductor calling out to passengers.

Mama Bose beamed from ear to ear.

“My own time don come,” she danced in front of the fire bowl that served as her plantain oven. She collected from all the political parties. She danced, clutching her gifts like someone who has just won the lottery. She told herself she had outsmarted the politicians. What did she know?

The election bribe pays a few bills. Soon, life returns to normal, to the old hard ways and days.

Three months later, Mama Bose’s pregnant daughter developed complications. The health centre in their community had no drugs, no doctor and no functioning equipment. They travelled miles in search of treatment, spending far more than the money Mama Bose proudly collected on election day.

The road leading to the hospital was full of craters. The ambulance did not come. Her grandson’s school roof still leaks whenever rain falls till today.

Suddenly, that precious election gift begins to look like the most expensive bargain she ever struck. She thought she collected free money. She was actually paying in advance for four extra years of suffering.

Then there is Kunle.

A university graduate with dreams bigger than his pockets. Jobs have become as scarce as honest campaign promises. Election day is his own employment day. Party agents know his type. They call him aside. One envelope here. Another envelope there.

Kunle laughs.

“I’ve made more money today than I have in three months.”

His friends clap for his smartness.

Then election ends.

Months become years.

The factories remain silent. Electricity behaves like a visitor from another country. Investors stay away. Employment opportunities become rumours shared on social media.

Kunle spends the next four years cursing everyone out on all his social media handles, complaining that Nigeria has failed young people.

Perhaps. But did he not also fail himself the day he exchanged his voice for a few notes?

The politician got four years in office. Kunle got one afternoon of celebration.

Who made the better business deal?

Now meet Baba Matthew, the self-proclaimed village economist.

His philosophy is simple.

“Collect from everybody,” he tells anyone who cares to listen. “No politician will cheat me.”

He collects from Party A, collects from Party B and also from Party C.

He walks around the village like a financial genius.

Then the rainy season comes.

The bridge leading to his farm collapses.

His cassava cannot reach the market.

His motorcycle develops one fault after another because the road has become a punishment for sins even he is not willing to acknowledge.

The money he spends repairing tyres alone is more than everything he collected during the election.

He thought he had outsmarted politicians.

Instead, he signed a four-year agreement against his own prosperity.

The greatest lie Nigerians tell themselves during elections is this:

“If I don’t collect it, someone else will.”

It sounds logical.

Until everybody, everyone started saying the same thing. Now, everybody is counting losses together.

The politician who spent millions buying votes quickly recovers his investment after assuming office. Contracts become inflated. Public funds become private savings. Merit gives way to loyalty. Roads become abandoned. Schools decay. Hospitals become consultation centres without medicine.

The voter who collected N10,000 eventually pays hundreds of thousands through poor healthcare, unemployment, insecurity, bad roads, expensive transport and businesses crippled by the absence of electricity.

Who, then, cheated whom?

Let us be fair. Hunger is a wicked adviser.

Many Nigerians are genuinely hungry. Some mothers do not know where the next meal will come from. Many fathers cannot pay school fees. Pensioners are abandoned. Young people roam the streets with certificates but without jobs.

Vote buyers understand this. They do not distribute rice after elections. They arrive when stomachs are empty because poverty is the best campaign manager any desperate inconsiderate politician can hire.

But poverty is not the whole story.

Some people who sell votes are not hungry.

They drive good cars.

They own comfortable homes.

They simply believe politics is a marketplace where everybody must collect something.

That mindset is as dangerous as poverty itself.

It is time to pinch ourselves awake. Your vote is not a loaf of bread.

It is an employment letter. Every election, Nigerians get to interview men and women who wish to become governors, legislators and presidents.

Imagine employing a driver because he gave you N10,000. Would you trust your family in his vehicle?

Imagine employing a doctor because she bought you a bag of rice. Would you allow her into the operating theatre?

Why then do we employ those who will control billions of naira, shape our children’s future and make life-and-death decisions simply because they gave us temporary gifts?

Isn’t it time for communities to organise their own quiet revolution? Imagine an entire street agreeing that no vote is for sale. Imagine a whole village announcing, “We shall listen to your manifesto, but our conscience is not in the market.” Imagine churches and mosques reminding worshippers that integrity should not disappear inside the polling booth.

Imagine traditional rulers declaring that the dignity of their communities is worth more than election money.

Imagine young people proudly saying, “I refused their money because my future is not for sale.”

Vote buying survives because there are willing sellers. The day sellers disappear, buyers will pack their bags and go home.

Democracy is not sustained by electoral laws alone. It survives because ordinary men and women decide that their conscience cannot be purchased.

The politician who buys votes certainly deserves condemnation. But the citizen who sells his vote should pause and ask one painful question:

After collecting this money, who will suffer the consequences?

The answer is painfully obvious.

His children.

His business.

His community.

His future.

And his country.

How come these sellers don’t see these consequences even when they are already suffering? Their community schools are either roofless, windowless, teacherless or all of the above. Educating the children of the vote sellers to university level has become more difficult than a herculean task. The ones they managed to send to school with ‘LAPO’ loans have not found jobs five years after graduation. Those who found jobs are paid measly sums. Now everybody is living at home in the same space they were living in 20 years ago. They have collected election bribes for five election seasons; their lots have not changed. Still, they think only their rulers need to change.

That is why the question before us this election season is no longer, “when will politicians stop buying votes?”

The more urgent question is this:

When will the vote seller stop cheating himself?

Because on the day Nigerians finally realise that a vote is worth more than a few cups of rice, more than a wrapper, more than N10,000 and more than a fleeting moment of satisfaction, that day, the merchants of vote buying will discover that their market has closed forever.

And Nigeria, at long last, may begin to harvest the rich dividends of a democracy where conscience, not cash, decides who governs.

The views expressed by contributors are strictly personal and not of Law & Society Magazine.

Follow our WhatsApp Channel

Code Beats Counsel: AI has proved that law belongs to everyone

By Kachi Okezie, Esq

The gavel didn’t fall for a barrister last month. It fell for code. At Wandsworth County Court, a judge awarded £7,000 to a freelance HR consultant and dismissed the other side’s counterclaim. Nothing unusual there: small claims courts do that daily. What was unusual was who prepared the case. Garfield AI, the UK’s first regulated AI law firm, didn’t just assist a lawyer. It drafted the pleadings, managed disclosure, prepared four witness statements, compiled the trial bundle, and ran the strategy. Then it instructed a human barrister for the 3-hour hearing because UK law still requires a mouthpiece in court.

The barrister looked at the AI’s work and called it “more than sufficient”. The judge agreed. Code beat counsel, and for the first time anywhere in the world, a court accepted that an algorithm could meet the duty of care owed to a client and win against human solicitors. That is the day law stopped belonging only to those who can afford it.

To understand why this matters, start with the economics of justice. Law has always been priced like a luxury. In London a junior solicitor bills £300 an hour. In Lagos a simple demand letter can cost a month’s rent. The result is a silent tax on legal rights. A landlord loses a deposit, an employer withholds final pay, a client refuses to pay an invoice. The amount is too small for court but too large to ignore. So people walk away. They tell themselves “it’s not worth the stress” and the debtor learns that delay pays. That is not justice. That is rationing.

Garfield cut through that rationing by doing what AI does best: turning repetition into software. It interviewed the client, identified the legal basis, drafted the letter before action for £2, filed the claim for £50, responded to the defence, and prepared everything a county court judge expects. Total cost to the client: £400. The other side had both a solicitor and a barrister. Garfield had training data and processing power. The judge didn’t care which side had more wigs. He cared which side had better documents. And code won.

Now move that logic from London to Abuja, Accra, Nairobi, and Kampala. The problem Garfield solved is our problem too, only bigger. Nigeria’s MSMEs are owed trillions in unpaid invoices. The World Bank says enforcing a simple contract in Nigeria takes 546 days on average. Most traders, freelancers, landlords, and small businesses never bother with court because the price of entry is higher than the claim itself. An AI firm that can file a magistrate court claim for ₦25,000 in fees changes that calculation. Suddenly the cost of recovery drops below the value of the debt. That shifts behaviour. When debtors know you can sue cheaply and quickly, they pay on time. Contract culture improves not because people got more honest, but because enforcement got more affordable. Code over counsel means consequences over excuses.

The second reason this hits differently in developing societies is supply. Nigeria has roughly 140,000 lawyers for 220 million people, and most are clustered in Lagos and Abuja. If you’re in Lokoja, Yola, or Ogbomoso, finding affordable counsel for a tenancy dispute or NYSC allowance issue can be tough. AI doesn’t need a Lekki office. It needs your facts and the internet. Garfield is authorised by the UK Solicitors Regulation Authority, which means it carries insurance and client money protection. A Nigerian version regulated by the NBA and LPDC could do the same for debt recovery, tenancy, consumer complaints, employment disputes, and the thousands of small matters that clog our lower courts. Not murder trials, not complex mergers. But the 80% of legal problems that are document-heavy and precedent-driven. Code can scale where humans can’t.

There’s also the corruption angle that most people won’t say out loud. Part of why Nigerians avoid courts isn’t just cost, it’s friction. Adjournments, lost files, “come back next month”, informal demands. AI doesn’t get tired, doesn’t forget deadlines, and doesn’t ask for “transport money”. It files on time, tracks every date, generates perfect bundles, and cites the rules. That doesn’t end judicial corruption overnight, but it removes the logistical gaps that enable discretion to become delay. When both parties submit AI-drafted, citation-checked pleadings, the judge can focus on law instead of chasing paperwork. Code over counsel makes the process boring, and boring processes are harder to manipulate.

The pushback will be loud. “AI can’t understand context.” Fair. Today’s models still hallucinate and miss nuance. Garfield didn’t argue the case itself; a human barrister did. That hybrid is the real near future: AI handles 90% of drafting, research, and admin, humans handle advocacy and judgment. “What about jobs?” The same fear greeted calculators, word processors, and e-filing. Junior lawyers won’t vanish. Their work shifts from typing witness statements to checking AI output, advising clients, and doing courtroom persuasion. Firms that adapt will reach more clients at lower cost. Firms that don’t will price themselves out of small claims entirely. The market will decide.

But the deepest shift is philosophical. For yonks, the legal profession has sold itself as a priesthood. Complex language, slow process, high fees, exclusive access. Garfield’s win says the technical part isn’t magic. If an algorithm can read the Civil Procedure Rules, apply them to facts, and persuade a county court judge, then legal knowledge is more codifiable than we like to admit. That’s uncomfortable for lawyers, but liberating for everyone else. Justice stops being something you buy from a gatekeeper and starts being something you access like electricity or mobile money. You still need senior advocates for complex matters, but for routine rights enforcement, you only need software.

For Nigeria, the Wandsworth judgment should be a starting gun. Imagine an AI firm integrated with a National Court Automation System. You upload your contract and proof of service. It drafts the claim, files it in the magistrate court, serves the defendant electronically, and reminds you of hearing dates. Flat fee: ₦25,000. That would flood lower courts at first, yes, but it would also flood the economy with recovered cash. It would teach a generation that the law works if you can afford to use it. Right now too many Nigerians don’t believe that. An AI barrister could change the belief by changing the price.

£7,000 is small money in London. But history doesn’t care about the amount. It cares about the precedent. This is the first time a court accepted AI as counsel’s equal for prep work and awarded judgment against human lawyers. The next decade will scale that from £7k claims to £70k, then to family matters, then to criminal defence support. Robots won’t replace judges or senior advocates. But they will replace the friction that keeps ordinary people out of court.

Code over counsel doesn’t mean lawyers are obsolete. It means law is no longer a monopoly. The day Garfield won in London was the day AI proved justice can be cheaper, faster, and still fair. And once justice gets cheaper, everything else, business trust, contract culture, faith in institutions, starts to change too. The robot barrister didn’t just win a case. It announced that law, finally, belongs to everyone.

Kachi Okezie, Esq is a legal practitioner and chartered mediator.

Follow our WhatsApp Channel

FIDA raises alarm as violence against women, children escalates across Nigeria

At NEC opening in Abuja, Country Vice President Eliana Martins says abuse, kidnappings and exploitation have become a national emergency demanding urgent action.

The International Federation of Women Lawyers (FIDA) Nigeria has sounded a fresh alarm over what it describes as an escalating wave of violence against women and children, warning that the country is witnessing a dangerous pattern of abuse that can no longer be dismissed as isolated criminal incidents.

Speaking at the opening of FIDA Nigeria’s Second Quarter National Executive Council (NEC) Meeting in Abuja, the organisation’s Country Vice President (CVP), Eliana Martins, said the increasing prevalence of gender-based violence, child abuse, trafficking, exploitation and insecurity reflects deeper institutional failures that require immediate and coordinated intervention.

Martins lamented that behind every reported case lies a human tragedy, with countless women stripped of their dignity and children robbed of safety and opportunity.

“The frequency and severity of violations against women and children in Nigeria can no longer be treated as isolated incidents,” she said. “They reflect a troubling national pattern that demands urgent and sustained action.”

FIDA expressed concern over the growing number of reports involving rape, domestic violence, harmful traditional practices, child labour and neglect, warning that the physical, psychological and economic consequences continue to devastate families and communities across the country.

The association called on governments, security agencies and judicial institutions to strengthen enforcement of laws protecting women and children, expand access to legal aid and survivor support services, and ensure perpetrators are investigated and prosecuted without delay.

According to Martins, protecting women and children is not simply a social obligation but a measure of the nation’s commitment to justice, equality and sustainable development.

Schools Must Not Become Hunting Grounds

Eliana Martins described recent kidnappings involving schoolchildren in Oyo State and Maiduguri as disturbing reminders that many Nigerian children remain unsafe even in environments meant to nurture and protect them.

She said the recurring attacks undermine not only the constitutional right to education but also public confidence in the state’s ability to safeguard its youngest citizens.

“Children should never have to choose between getting an education and staying alive,” Martins said as she urged authorities to strengthen security around schools and accelerate efforts to secure the release of abducted victims.

FIDA warned that persistent insecurity is likely to worsen school dropouts and deepen educational inequality, particularly among girls who already face significant barriers to accessing education.

The association called for stronger collaboration between security agencies, education authorities and local communities to ensure that schools remain safe spaces where children can learn without fear of violence or abduction.

Inflation Is Driving Women and Children Into Exploitation

According to Martins, the soaring cost of living is increasing the prevalence of child labour, school dropouts, child marriage, trafficking and gender-based violence as struggling households grapple with the inability to afford food, education and healthcare.

“The increasing cost of living continues to place immense pressure on families, exposing women and children to heightened risks of exploitation and abuse,” she warned.

FIDA urged federal and state governments to implement targeted social protection programmes, expand food security initiatives and improve access to affordable healthcare and education to cushion the impact of the economic crisis.

FIDA stressed that unless meaningful relief measures are introduced, vulnerable populations—particularly women, children, persons with disabilities and displaced families—will continue to bear a disproportionate share of the country’s economic challenges.

Unveils Sweeping Blueprint to Protect Women and Children

The association also advocated targeted economic interventions to cushion vulnerable households from inflation and unemployment, warning that economic distress is increasing exposure to child labour, forced marriage, exploitation and gender-based violence.

FIDA further called for stronger child protection systems, survivor-centred support mechanisms and policies that empower women economically and politically.

“The safety, dignity and rights of women and children are not merely social concerns,” Martins stressed. “They are fundamental human rights and essential indicators of national development.”

The organisation pledged to continue using litigation, advocacy, law reform initiatives and strategic partnerships to hold duty bearers accountable and advance equality, justice and human dignity across Nigeria.

Follow our WhatsApp Channel

Hajia Hansatu Zannah applauds Tinubu, Shettima at three-year milestone

Hajia Hansatu Zannah, distinguished member of the Governing Council of the African Union Agenda 2063 and Ambassador Plenipotentiary, has extended heartfelt commendations to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR, and Vice President Kashim Shettima, GCON, as they mark three years in office.

“This remarkable milestone signifies an era of purposeful leadership that has brought notable triumphs to our nation under President Tinubu’s administration,” Hajia Hansatu remarked during an engagement with select political correspondents in Abuja on Tuesday.

She praised President Tinubu for his unwavering commitment to national unity, economic transformation, and the strengthening of Nigeria’s global reputation. Reflecting on the administration’s achievements, she highlighted progress in infrastructure development, anti-corruption efforts, and initiatives designed to stimulate sustainable economic growth.

“President Tinubu’s three years in office have been defined by a resolute pursuit of policies aimed at revitalizing our economy and enhancing the quality of life for all Nigerians. His dedication to infrastructure expansion, healthcare improvement, and educational advancement is commendable and lays a strong foundation for future prosperity,” she stated.

Hansatu, a seasoned media personality and communication strategist, emphasized the importance of visionary leadership in navigating Nigeria’s current challenges. She expressed optimism that the administration would continue to consolidate its successes while addressing pressing issues such as security, unemployment, and economic stability.

“In these challenging times, Nigeria requires a leader with vision, resilience, and a profound understanding of our diverse cultural and socio-economic landscape. President Tinubu has demonstrated these qualities through his inclusive approach and steadfast dedication to uplifting every segment of society,” she added.

Calling for collective responsibility, Hajia Hansatu urged Nigerians to support the administration’s efforts and remain united in confronting national challenges.

“As this administration celebrates this milestone, let us recommit ourselves to the values of hard work, unity, and patriotism. Together, we can build a Nigeria that is strong, prosperous, just, and equitable—a nation admired across the world,” she said.

She further noted that President Tinubu’s leadership style is distinguished by his detribalized disposition, drawing parallels with the late Chief Moshood Abiola’s inclusive politics. “Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu has embraced every tribe and religion in Nigeria. His compassion, generosity, and inclusive governance inspire trust and confidence in his leadership,” she affirmed.

Hansatu concluded by reaffirming her personal commitment to supporting President Tinubu and Vice President Shettima in their mission to advance Nigeria’s welfare and development. She pledged to continue serving as an exemplary ambassador both at home and abroad, dedicated to initiatives that promote national progress and unity.

Follow our WhatsApp Channel

TIPS