Home Blog Page 137

Fela’s Wizkid

By Lasisi Olagunju

The Cambridge English dictionary defines ‘Wizkid’ as “a young person who is very clever and successful.” Collins Dictionary defines it as “a person who is outstandingly successful for his or her age.” Wisdom Library says “’Wiz’ is a shortened form of ‘wizard,’ connoting skill, talent, and expertise, while ‘kid’ implies youthfulness or being junior. When combined, ‘Wizkid’ suggests a young, talented, and skilled individual, particularly in a specific field.”

Fela and Wizkid? The space between the nose and the forehead is not as short as it appears. A noisy digital skirmish: a torrent of online exchanges; an endless war of words. All between Seun Kuti and Afrobeat super star, Wizkid, with his fans, over a reported off-hand tweet that super-rich Wizkid had surpassed Fela Anikulapo Kuti in music and social stature.

Seun Kuti is reported to have remarked that “it’s an insult to Fela to call Wizkid the new Fela.” Apparently in frustration with the back and forth over the inanity on the Internet, the living star is reported to have retorted: “Ok. I big pass your Papa!!! Wetin u wan do? Fool at 40.” That “igán” was the spark that caused the conflagration.

It is a needless quarrel. Wizkid is not Fela. He is Fela’s wizkid. The fight is stupid because the truth is self-evident. A child may own as many garments as an elder, but he cannot possess the same number of rags. Time, not tailoring, produces experience. But, there is nothing that the Internet and its warriors cannot weaponise. And, the undiscerning is easily conscripted into the raucous army. Wizkid himself understands the distance involved. So, let no one summon tension where harmony is the musical key.

The younger wizard knows the source of his tumultuous river; he has never denied where it flows from. In a May 3, 2017 interview with English DJ and author, Semtex, Wizkid traced the arc of his musical influences with disarming candour. “So I was influenced by rap, reggae, Bob Marley, Fela… like good music, some big names,” he said. Yet he admitted that Fela’s music did not immediately appeal to him. His parents played Fela and King Sunny Ade at home, but the young Wizkid, by his own account, was “not old enough to understand or enjoy the music.” He wasn’t alone with that judgment. Even Fela’s mother, at the experimental beginning of his career, told him: “Start playing music your people understand, not jazz.”

Time, however, has a way of teaching the tentative how to stand firm and take their share of what life offers. Wizkid, the young man who once declared that he did not want to be “just an African star” grew into a global figure by climbing the ladder of destiny mounted on the shoulders of global giants. He mentions them in that Semtex interview: Bob Marley of Reggae, and unmistakably, Fela Anikulapo Kuti of Afrobeat.

Another old interview is unearthed by the present noise. In it, Wizkid speaks to the Fela matter with humility and clarity: “We can’t compare, let’s not use that word because it is like disrespect when you’re mentioning Wizkid and Fela in the same sentence. You can’t compare. Fela is someone that inspires me. I have him tattooed on me. Fela’s face is all over my body. Everything he did with his music, his legacy, inspires me to be great and to want to do more.”

Wizkid is big because he is wise. Reading him, hearing him, tells that the young man enjoys the benefit of good upbringing. There is his ‘Ojuelegba’ line:

“Ti isu eni ba dele

A f’owo bo je…”

And he remembers to tell his interviewer that underneath that line is the timeless advice he got from his mother: “When I was like younger my Mama told me, you when God blesses you, you should be smart enough to know that you should be more cautious. That’s when you should get more cautious of what you say, what you do and how you move.” To be cautious is to act with care, with prudence. The synonym is wisdom. What Wizkid says his mother told him is the same as what Kahlil Gibran tells us: “Travel and tell no one, live a true love story and tell no one, live happily and tell no one, people ruin beautiful things.”

The young wizard is wise. Wizkid is lucky he has a mother who prays. He sings:

“See eh, e kira fun mummy mi o,

Ojojumo lo n s’adura…”

He is as lucky as Abraham Lincoln who said the same: “I remember my mother’s prayers and they have always followed me. They have clung to me all my life.”

Now, if there is a positive gain for me in the ‘childish’ fight over which is bigger and deeper between the Atlantic and the Lagos Lagoon, it is the opportunity to read and know more about the music of the youth, and the chance to throw long-owed libation at the king of waters. In celebrating Fela, therefore, we celebrate a king of songs whose insistence is that art must not be for art’s sake; that music must matter, that it must speak when politics lies, and that it must disturb the comfort of the powerful.

The difference between fire and light is in what is done with them. Some music is not meant to entertain alone, but to awaken. The music of Fela is fire and light combined; it is a force that moves more than bodies; it moves minds. He created Afrobeat; he made music, and with it, made life and living into sound and resistance. His everything is a fine blend, whether of assonance or of alliteration; he made sense out of nonsense. His ‘Zombie’, for instance, has not stopped teaching us that when power stops thinking, rhythm must do the thinking for it.

Fela sang the outrage of today and the rage of tomorrow yesterday. Like NASA’s Perseverance Rover on Mars, the Afrobeat king orbited power with defiance. He was at once coarse and smooth, abrasive and balmy in the same breath.

The Yoruba know that when you sing wahala softly, you can get an entire city dancing. Call it iboosi if you like, trouble turned into tune. Fela sang “Palaver” and made it sound sweet; even his “Yeepa” sounds so sweet that it pirouetted the sonics of chaos into pleasure. Where there is “Sorrow, Tears and Blood”, Fela trained his voice and drum not to keep quiet; and they never did; they still are not quiet. In the moral urgency of African chant, Fela’s music sings and dances; and as it dances, it indicts. When he winks his wings make meaning. His clenched fist circles the earth; his art is an eraser that continually cleans off the boundary between stage and street, between rhythm and revolt. You listen to his ‘Alagbon Close’ lyrics, you hear his sax speak the language of condemnation, while his drum sings defiance to state captors.

The Gen Z fighting on X over which star is the biggest in the cosmos should know this: Fela was one spirit who stretched tradition until it screamed. He was the potter who scooped mounds of Yoruba earth and, from it, moulded an impossible steed for the battlefield of the world. In his sax, step and sup, music became the language of war and peace. His truth is dense, his anger repetitive, his chant hypnotic. In his dance steps are disclaimers that deprecate the chaos of Nigeria’s politics. In 1975, he flung defiantly rebellious “Expensive Shit” at power and its police; the steel-hearted swooned in pain. Fela’s truth is eternally too heavy for weak stomachs.

He acted alone in his rebellion. “Solitude sometimes is best society,” says John Milton. Fela’s choice of road to tread almost obeys that Milton poetry. He was not a gentleman, and he sang it into our skulls: “A no be gentleman at all o.” His songs, like his life, wear no borrowed manners. Every Fela song is a sermon rudely delivered; every performance a trial of societal evils; every arrest a verse added to an unfinished composition on power and freedom. His eclecticism, with his synthesis, and his defiance, give his music oxygen. They are what make Fela endure.

In Fela’s biological musical children, “heirs of fame,” and in the wizard kids who sing his legacy, he lives. The Abami Eda spirit pulses through Femi and Seun Kuti; their blazing saxophones and militant energy carry forward the torch of political Afrobeat. This paragraph is a product of reading and asking. In reading and exploring, I got to know so much about this subject: Fela’s legendary drummer, Tony Allen, was right here, modifying the rhythms, making the music irresistible. Beyond his fecund loins, Fela’s immortality is heard in the sounds of contemporary stars: Burna Boy, Wizkid, Davido, Tiwa Savage, Yemi Alade, Rema, Joeboy, and Olamide. In these stars, Afrobeat’s pulse blends seamlessly with the aplomb of Afropop, hip-hop, and global pop. Singly or in pairs, they speak to new audiences, while across the world, fans feel Fela in the music of Benin’s Angélique Kidjo, UK-based Afro B, and even Major Lazer. And, writing and reading this paragraph again, I realize I have convinced myself that decades after death yanked Fela’s fingers from the pot of world music, his creation, Afrobeat, still walks the streets loud, stubborn, and unbowed

A thoroughly studied phenomenon; in one text, Academy Award winner, Joseph Patel, says “Fela Kuti is the truth.” In another line, American writer, Knox Robinson, describes him as “the original Afronaut.” Music scholar and historian, Peter Guralnick and Douglas Wolk, published a survey of turn-of-the-millennium music in 2002. In it, they make the bio of “irreducible” Fela read like a political chant. Now, read them and chant along:

“Fela Kuti: 77 albums, 27 wives, over 200 court appearances. Harassed, beaten, tortured, jailed. Twice-born father of Afrobeat. spiritualist, pan-Africanist. Commune King. Composer, saxophonist, keyboardist, dancer… There will never be another like him.”

The views expressed by contributors are strictly personal and not of Law & Society Magazine.

Nigeria’s crisis of judicial pensions is not about the law of Karma

By Chidi Anselm Odinkalu

“The term of office of judges, their independence, security, adequate remuneration, conditions of service, pensions and the age of retirement shall be adequately secured by law.”

Principle 11, United Nations Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary, (1985)

Babajide Candide-Johnson became a judge of the High Court of Lagos State at 45. The son of the third Chief Judge of Lagos State, he is a polyglot, fluent in several languages, including French. When his judicial tenure came to an end on 27 June 2021, 20 years after he became a judge, Babajide Candide-Johnson was the head of the family court in the High Court of Lagos State.

At his retirement, the Chief Judge of Lagos State, Kazeem Alogba, described Babajide Candide-Johnson as “a brilliant, hardworking, meticulous and fearless judge, an intellectual who delivered judgments without fear or favour.”

Those words describe a model judge. Yet, nine months later, in March 2022, he was back in court, this time to sue the government of Lagos State, whom he had served without blemish in judicial office for two decades, for “his pension, severance gratuity, and other entitlements.” 

The government of Lagos State initially demurred, disingenuously arguing that  responsibility for judicial pensions under the Pension Right of Lagos State Judicial Officers Law of 2015, lay with the state Judicial Service Commission. The state government later saved itself from a public unravelling of an embarrassing position, and the parties agreed to an amicable settlement.

In 2022 alone, at least five other former judges of the High Court of Lagos also sued the State government over the same issue.

The year before the retirement of Babajide Candide-Johnson in Lagos, 22 retired judges of the High Court of Abia, the self-described “God’s own State” in south-east Nigeria, had similarly sued before the National Industrial Court of Nigeria, (NICN), claiming to have been shafted by a succession of three governors going back nearly a decade and a half, who claimed mandates from God to ruin the state. It appears that in response to the case, the then state government “reportedly promised to pay N10 million to the retired judges every month, but only did so for one month.”

Three years after this case began, it was still stuck in the NICN, with little progress. Meanwhile, five of the retired judges had died in penury while waiting for the case to rescue them. In May 2023, Abia State installed a newly elected governor. Two months later, he and the retired judges reached an agreement to clear the back-log of 16 years of judicial pensions liability.

Around the country, retired judges are increasingly resorting to judicial proceedings to call attention to a crippling and chronic crisis of judicial pensions for judges who retired before June 2023. In Ondo State, retired judges sued in April 2016 for similar issues. Their peers in Imo, Ogun, and Oyo have as well.

For long, the constitution provided for how to compute judicial pensions but not necessarily for how to finance or administer them effectively. Effective from June 2023, a new constitutional amendment transferred to the National Judicial Council (NJC), responsibility for the administration of judicial pensions. This has not, however, alleviated or addressed the crisis of judicial pension obligations arising from before then and may, indeed, have surfaced new problems of its own.

In Kogi, eight retired judges of the state High Court have recently served notice on the state government of their intention to return to court as litigants to enforce their pension rights. They include a former Chief Judge of the State, John Bayo Olowosegun; a former President, Customary Court of Appeal, Hon. Justice Yunusa Musa; and a former senior judge, Professor Andrew Alaba-Ajileye. 

The NJC has to accept some responsibility for the historical liabilities. It has been an indifferent and perfunctory advocate for retired judges. On his way out of office as then chairman of the NJC and Chief Justice of Nigeria, and after much hand-wringing, Olukayode Ariwoola, in January 2023, finally tabled the issue before the Council at its 100th meeting.

In a statement at the end of the meeting, the Council described as “worrisome, the situation whereby many Judicial Officers of the States are being owed their retirement benefits, including severance pay/gratuity and pensions”, and warned that this undermined the rule of law without clearly saying how so.

Even worse, the Council failed to disclose which states were involved, for how long or by how much. Instead, the NJC directed State Chief Judges from across the country to report on compliance with this resolution without indicating what it had previously done to compute the quantum of liabilities involved.

On the whole, the NJC lost an opportunity to show that it cared about the subject matter; that it had indeed bothered to do its homework; or that this was an issue on which it desired to enlist any support or reinforcement for the affected retired judges. Since then, the Council does not appear to have seriously monitored or re-engaged with this issue.

The consequences of the chronic accumulation of pension debts in the public service are quite corrosive of both the morale of existing personnel and the effectiveness of service delivery. Serving officers just need to behold that situation in order to appreciate the urgency of the need to take their own destinies into their own hands while they still have the opportunity to do so.

The judiciary presents a somewhat special case because the average age of intake into the bench of the superior courts of record is higher than in any other branch of pensionable service in Nigeria. The consequences of the deliberate neglect to fulfil pension obligations can, therefore, be quite dire. In States like Taraba in the north-east, for instance, many judges who retired before 2023 have died waiting endlessly for their pensions and terminal benefits.

The uncertainties about judicial benefits have also created other problems of their own, with crooks cashing in on the vulnerabilities of retired judges. In March 2024, the NJC went public with the complaint that “fraudsters had been bombarding retired judges with phone calls demanding various sums of money to help them fast-track the payment of their retirement benefits.” It vowed that the Council “would never demand money from any judicial officer to fast-track the payment of his retirement benefits.” The jury, at best, is still out on this.

The problem remains that this crisis of judicial pensions and terminal benefits fosters a system of perverse incentives conducive to bartering judicial outcomes for material benefit.

Some may view as uncharitable a strand of public opinion that suggests that there is a Law of Karma at work and that the destitution of retired judges in this way is the natural consequence of a deepening crisis of judicial integrity and politicization of the judiciary. Others have gone as far as to accuse judges indiscriminately of feeding upfront while in service the political lion with the menu of their pensions.

Even if the conduct of some judges in service could conceivably deserve the attentions of a hypothetical Karma, there remain many judges who do their best not to fall into that category. Such points of view should, however, demonstrate for all involved the urgency of addressing this issue with finality.

For the judiciary, it is existential at both personal and institutional levels. For the citizens and court users, it is the only way to guarantee the possibility of minimal credibility to the work of the courts. For the country, it should ensure that the promise of an independent judiciary stands a chance of not disintegrating into a constitutional hoax. The distinction between judges who retired before June 2023 and those retiring thereafter is artificial and unnecessary. The NJC can work constructively with government at the federal and state levels to close it.

A lawyer and a teacher, Odinkalu can be reached at [email protected]

The views expressed by contributors are strictly personal and not of Law & Society Magazine.

Snapchat pays to escape explosive social media addiction trial

Snapchat on Wednesday confirmed it made a deal to avoid a US civil trial accusing it, along with Meta, TikTok, and YouTube, of addicting young people to social media.

A jury trial is set to begin in Los Angeles next week in what is being called a “bellwether” proceeding, as its outcome could set the tone for a wave of similar litigation across the United States.

Many of those cases are being coordinated by the Social Media Victims Law Centre, a legal organisation dedicated to holding social media companies accountable for harms caused to young people online.

“The parties are pleased to have been able to resolve this matter in an amicable manner,” parent company Snap and the Social Media Victims Law Centre said, disclosing no details regarding the settlement in the case playing out in Los Angeles.

Internet titans have argued that they are shielded by US law that frees them of responsibility for what social media users post, but these cases argue they are culpable due to business models designed to hold people’s attention and promote content that winds up harming their mental health.

Social media firms are accused in suits of addicting young users to content that has led to depression, eating disorders, psychiatric hospitalisation, and even suicide.

Snap chief executive Evan Spiegel was slated to testify at the trial along with other social media firm executives, including Meta boss Mark Zuckerberg.

“Unfortunately, there are many potential dangers in using online social media, and the owners of these platforms bear responsibility for its proper use,” a law centre spokesperson contended in a posted video.

The suit heading for jury trial in Los Angeles accuses social media algorithms of addicting a 19-year-old woman, causing severe mental health problems.

The trial before Judge Carolyn Kuhl in state court is expected to start the first week of February, after a jury is selected.

Lawsuits accusing social media platforms of practices endangering young users are also making their way through federal court in Northern California and state courts across the country.

AFP

Lagos bus driver questions official explanation after twin infants die

Promise Samuel’s twin boys were healthy when he carried them into a government primary health centre in Ajangbadi, Lagos, on the morning of December 24, 2025.

By the next morning, both children were dead.

The nine-month-old twins, Samuel said, had shown no signs of illness before receiving routine immunisation injections at the facility. But moments after the shots were administered, the babies began to weaken, their bodies burning with fever.

“They were perfectly fine when we arrived,” Samuel told reporters. “After the injections, everything changed.”

According to Samuel, nurses administered injections to both infants and instructed the parents to immediately give them portions of a tablet medication. Shortly after, the twins developed dangerously high temperatures before the family had even left the clinic.

When concerns were raised, Samuel said the nurse advised fever medication at home and warm baths if the temperature worsened. The family paid ₦2,500 in fees and left with a mosquito net given as a Christmas gift.

Within hours, the twins were vomiting.

By nightfall, they were stooling uncontrollably and growing weaker by the minute. By morning, they were no longer breathing.

“When I reached the hospital, they were already gone,” Samuel said. “Their colour had changed. Their teeth were clenched. I couldn’t believe it.”

In shock, Samuel took the babies to multiple hospitals, all of which confirmed their deaths. Still refusing to accept reality, he carried their bodies to a church, hoping for a miracle.

“I only accepted it was over when I noticed the smell,” he said.

Government officials later suggested food contamination as a possible cause, an explanation Samuel rejects outright.

“They didn’t eat after the immunisation,” he said. “All their food is still in my house—untouched. How can the same food kill two babies at the same time, on the same day?”

Initially asked to pay nearly ₦1 million for an autopsy, Samuel said he could not afford it. Authorities later conducted the autopsy themselves. The results remain pending.

Fearing a cover-up, Samuel took the case to the police. The investigation has moved from FESTAC to Okokomaiko and now to the State CID in Yaba.

“I don’t want the truth buried,” he said. “If negligence killed my children, the government must admit it.”

The tragedy has shattered the family emotionally and financially. Already facing eviction, Samuel says his savings are gone, and his wife—now staying with her mother—has been unable to cope.

“I loved them deeply,” he said. “Their food is still there. Every time I see it, I break down.”

His regret is stark and unresolved.

“I regret taking my children to a government health centre,” he said. “Nigeria happened to me.”

Now, in a small Lagos home, two untouched feeding bottles sit where laughter once lived, and a father wakes each morning to the silence of a double grave. The clinic has moved on. The officials are “awaiting results.” But for Promise Samuel, justice is already overdue—because whatever the autopsy says, his children did not die of statistics or bureaucracy. They died in a system that asked for trust, gave injections, and returned him two lifeless bodies by Christmas morning.

Food for Officials, Dry Taps for Residents: Nasarawa’s budget exposed

As residents queue for water and children learn in overcrowded classrooms, Nasarawa State’s budget tells a stark story of misplaced priorities—one in which comfort for the political class appears to outweigh investment in survival and opportunity for ordinary citizens. For communities navigating thirst, illness and poverty, the figures raise an unsettling question: in a state with scarce resources and deep social needs, who exactly is the government spending for?

A review of Nasarawa State’s third-quarter 2025 budget performance by SaharaReporters shows that the state government spent ₦707 million on refreshments and meals between January and September 2025, even as funding for critical public services lagged far behind.

During the same nine-month period, capital expenditure for the Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Agency stood at just ₦300.5 million, underscoring a stark imbalance between administrative spending and investment in essential infrastructure.

The spending pattern has drawn sharp criticism from residents; many of whom say access to clean and potable water remains a daily struggle across large parts of the state.

“We barely get clean water. Even the people who sell water in jerrycans complain that it has become difficult to find water,” a resident of the Masaka area told SaharaReporters.
“The government promises to us have failed,” the resident added.

In Karu, another resident described water scarcity as both alarming and exhausting.
“When you find any place with water, it feels like you have found gold. It is very frustrating,” the resident said.

The findings align with earlier budget reviews by SaharaReporters that raised questions about the state’s spending priorities. An analysis of the Nasarawa State Government’s approved 2025 budget revealed that ₦2 billion was allocated for the extension and renovation of the State House of Assembly complex in Lafia.

Budget documents show that ₦1 billion was earmarked for extending the Assembly office building, while another ₦1 billion was allocated for renovation. By comparison, constituency projects—including borehole repairs, primary healthcare centres (PHCs), and road works—received ₦960 million, less than half the amount set aside for the Assembly complex.

Further analysis indicates that while ₦2 billion was committed to legislative infrastructure, the construction of three-block classroom buildings across the state was budgeted at ₦665 million. This suggests that the funds allocated to the Assembly project could have financed at least three similar classroom blocks, potentially expanding access to education.

According to data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) Multidimensional Poverty Index, 39 percent of school-age children in Nasarawa State lack access to education, highlighting the scale of the state’s education deficit.

Healthcare spending also reflects similar contrasts. While ₦2 billion was budgeted for the Assembly complex, only ₦1.5 billion was allocated for the construction of primary healthcare centres statewide. An additional ₦1.3 billion was set aside for the renovation of existing PHCs, while ₦400 million was earmarked for the Basic Healthcare Provision Fund (BHCPF).

For residents grappling with water shortages, limited healthcare access, and overcrowded classrooms, the figures have reinforced concerns that public funds are being diverted toward administrative comforts at the expense of basic needs.

Nestoil cries injustice after Appeal court disqualifies its lawyers in debt dispute

Two Nigerian energy companies, Nestoil Limited and Neconde Energy Limited, have accused the judiciary of grave injustice following a ruling by the Court of Appeal that disqualified their chosen legal counsel in an ongoing debt recovery dispute—an outcome they say amounts to a denial of their constitutional right to fair hearing and legal representation.

In a strongly worded statement released after the ruling, the companies said the decision effectively strips them of the right to appoint lawyers of their choice to defend claims brought against them by FBNQuest Merchant Bank Limited and First Trustees Limited.

“This is a glaring case of injustice, denial of hearing and denial of the right to defend oneself,” the statement said.

Origins of the Dispute

The case began as an alleged debt recovery action filed at the Federal High Court, Lagos, by FBNQuest Merchant Bank Limited and First Trustees Limited against Nestoil, Neconde, and individual defendants Ernest Azudialu-Obiejesi and Nnenna Obiejesi, in Suit No. FHC/L/CS/2127/2025.

According to the defendants, the originating processes were served at their Lagos office alongside far-reaching ex parte orders issued on October 22, 2025—orders they say were obtained without notice and without allowing them to be heard.

Upon being served, the defendants said they promptly engaged senior and reputable legal practitioners, including M.A. Banire & Associates, Wole Olanipekun & Co., Afe Babalola & Co., and Chief Chino Obiagu, SAN.

Their lawyers immediately moved to challenge the ex parte orders and sought to have the substantive matter heard on notice. The Federal High Court subsequently set aside the ex parte orders and fixed the case for hearing on December 12, 2025.

Fresh Ex Parte Orders—and a Turn at the Appeal Court

Days after that ruling, the plaintiffs allegedly filed another ex parte application—this time at the Court of Appeal—and obtained fresh orders within 24 hours. The defendants say they were again not heard before the orders were granted.

They further allege that the plaintiffs had earlier filed a motion on notice at the Court of Appeal but withdrew it without their knowledge, allegedly to clear the way for the ex parte application.

The dispute escalated when the plaintiffs, acting through a person described as a court-appointed receiver, filed an application seeking the Court of Appeal’s disqualification of the lawyers representing Nestoil and Neconde, and authorising the receiver to appoint new lawyers on their behalf.

The companies insist that no valid receivership exists and that the matter before the court remains a straightforward debt recovery action.

‘Plaintiffs Appointing Defendants’ Lawyers’

According to the statement, the Court of Appeal ruled that Nestoil and Neconde had no right to appoint lawyers of their choosing and that legal representation could instead be selected by the receiver allegedly appointed at the instance of the plaintiffs themselves.

“The implication,” the companies said, “is that the same plaintiffs who sued us will now appoint the lawyers meant to defend us against their own claims.”

They described the ruling as baffling and unprecedented, arguing that it violates fundamental principles of justice, fairness and the right to counsel.

“How a plaintiff can appoint lawyers to defend the defendants he has sued defies imagination,” the statement said, adding that the issue has now been left to the “court of public opinion.”

Allegations of Smear Campaign

The companies also accused the plaintiffs of sponsoring what they described as a campaign of false and malicious media reports, including unsubstantiated allegations of bribery against their lawyers and conflicting claims about the size of the alleged debt.

They denied all allegations of wrongdoing and said the figures being circulated were fictitious.

‘We Will Not Allow This to Stand’

Despite the ruling, Nestoil and Neconde said they remain determined to challenge what they view as a dangerous precedent.

“We will not allow this injustice to slip by,” the statement said. “Failure to fight injustice is to assist in perpetuating it.”

Legal analysts say the controversy raises far-reaching questions about due process, the limits of ex parte orders, and whether a court can compel defendants to accept legal representation chosen by parties with adverse interests—issues likely to provoke further legal and public scrutiny in the weeks ahead.

The full text of the statement reads:

SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT ON THE DISQUALIFICATION OF NESTOIL’S LAWYERS.

A GLARING CASE OF INJUSTICE, DENIAL OF HEARING AND DENIAL OF RIGHT TO DEFEND ONESELF.

Following the recent ruling of the Court of Appeal disqualifying the lawyers appointed by the respective organisations, NESTOIL LIMITED and NECONDE ENERGY LIMITED in the alleged debt recovery litigation instituted by the duo of FBNQuest Merchant Bank Limited and First Trustees Limited, it has become necessary for us to clarify the facts for the public and set the record straight.

This matter began as an alleged debt recovery action instituted by First Merchant Bank Limited and and First Trustees Limited against our organisations NESTOIL, NECONDE and Ernest Azudialu-Obiejesi and Nnenna Obiejesi in Suit No.: FHC/L/CS/2127/2025. We were served with the originating processes filed in the matter at the office address at 41/42 Akin Adesola Street, Victoria Island, Lagos, together with an ex parte order dated 22 October 2025 issued by the Federal High Court.

Upon being served, each of us (the Defendants) promptly engaged reputable legal practitioners to represent us, including M. A. Banire & Associates ( for NESTOIL); Wole Olanipekun & Co. (for NECONDE); Afe Babalola & Co. (for Ernest Azudialu-Obiejesi); and Chief Chino Obiagu, SAN (for Nnenna Obiejesi). However, far-reaching ex parte orders were obtained behind us and without affording us the benefit of being heard. When we became aware of these developments, our lawyers immediately challenged the ex parte orders and applied for them to be set aside. They also took steps to ensure that the substantive suit filed against us was fixed for hearing on 12 December 2025.

Within days after the ruling of the Federal High Court setting aside the ex parte orders and fixing the substantive matter for December 12, 2025, the Plaintiffs (FBNQuest) filed another Motion , ex parte again, at the Court of Appeal, and obtained, within 24 hours of filing the said Motion Ex Parte, fresh ex parte orders against us in a manner we still find incomprehensible till date. Our respective lawyers immediately challenged the validity of these ex parte orders. Interestingly, the lawyers to the Plaintiffs had earlier filed and served a Motion on Notice against us at the Court of Appeal which they withdrew behind us to pave way for their Motion Ex Parte. However, the Plaintiffs, acting through the person they purportedly appointed as receiver, filed another Motion at the Court of Appeal claiming that our lawyers (for NESTOIL and NECONDE) should be disqualified from representing us and that they, through their appointed receiver, should be the ones to appoint lawyers for us in an alleged debt recovery matter they instituted against us. We must note that as far as we are concerned, this alleged receivership is not in existence. The matter before the Court, as we have been made to understand by our lawyers, both internally and externally, is purely an alleged debt recovery action.

Our lawyers duly contested the application seeking to disqualify them from representing us in this alleged debt recovery matter and supplant their representation with lawyers appointed by the appointee of the alleged creditors. Bewilderingly, our lawyers informed us that the Court of Appeal delivered its ruling yesterday wherein the Court of Appeal said that WE HAVE NO RIGHT to appoint lawyers that will defend the case against us. The implication of the Court of Appeal ruling is that the Plaintiffs (FirstBank Merchant Bank Limited and First Trustees Limited) who appointed the so called receiver, are the same persons that will (through their appointed receiver) appoint lawyers to defend the case on our behalf against the Plaintiffs. How the plaintiff will be the one to appoint lawyers to defend the defendants he has sued baffles the imagination. The fairness and justice in this we just must leave to the court of public opinion for now.

Hitherto, these same Plaintiffs have been strenuously trying to smear our lawyers and our respective companies by falsely alleging bribery which never existed and quoting different fictitious alleged bank debt figures.

The avalanche of malicious and false stories being sponsored and circulated on online media is unprecedented.

It is however our firm resolve that this injustice that we have no right to defend ourselves, shall not be allowed to slip by ,because failure to fight against injustice is assisting to perpetuate same.

She Refused Sex. He Killed Her. Zambia’s horror and Africa’s gender violence reckoning

A suspected domestic homicide in Zambia and a viral account from Nigeria have reignited debate across Africa about gender-based violence, silence within families, and the growing refusal—especially among women—to endure abuse in the name of marriage.

In Zambia’s Western Province, police say a woman’s death initially reported as suicide has now been confirmed as murder. The case, which unfolded on New Year’s Day in Kaoma District, has drawn attention to the lethal consequences of domestic violence—and the lengths some perpetrators allegedly go to conceal it.

Zambia: Death Disguised as Suicide

Western Province Police Commanding Officer Rae Hamoonga identified the victim as Kashiba Kahinda, who police say was beaten to death by her husband, Michael Kahyata, 44, after she refused his demand for conjugal rights.

According to police, the incident occurred around 5:00 p.m. in Folkland Township shortly after Kahinda returned home from a crossover church service with her children. Investigators say an argument followed, culminating in a violent assault inside the family home.

“Preliminary investigations and statements from the children indicate that the deceased was murdered and later hanged,” Hamoonga said.

Police allege that after killing his wife, Kahyata staged the scene to resemble a suicide, instructing the children to enter the bedroom, where they found their mother hanging. He then reportedly cut the cloth used in the hanging, causing the body to fall onto the bed, before alerting neighbours that his wife had taken her own life.

Suspicious residents attempted to restrain him, but he fled. He was apprehended the following day by a relative of the deceased and handed over to the police. Kahyata is now in custody and has been charged with murder.

Nigeria: A Wedding Called Off—and a Reckoning Begins

Thousands of kilometres away, a Nigerian woman has sparked a fierce national conversation after publicly explaining why she abruptly ended her engagement—less than 24 hours after visiting her fiancé’s family home for a formal introduction.

In a deeply personal account that went viral on social media, the woman said a single night in the household exposed what she described as a deeply entrenched culture of domestic abuse—and collective silence.

Late that night, she said, she heard disturbing noises and realised her fiancé’s father was violently assaulting his wife. What unsettled her most, she wrote, was not only the severity of the violence but the response—or lack thereof—from the rest of the family.

Despite the presence of five adult children in the house, no one intervened. Her fiancé, she said, remained passive and later warned her not to interfere, dismissing the abuse as his mother’s fault and describing it as routine.

That night, she said, her prospective mother-in-law was forced to sleep outside while the rest of the household treated the episode as normal.

“If a man can justify abuse against his own mother,” she wrote, “what would stop him from doing the same to his wife?”

By morning, she left and formally called off the engagement, choosing what she described as safety, dignity and peace of mind over societal pressure to proceed with the marriage.

The story has triggered intense online debate, with many praising her decisiveness while others accused her of overreacting—an exchange that has exposed how deeply normalised domestic violence remains in parts of Nigerian society.

A Wider Pattern—and a Legal Shift

Advocates say both cases reflect a broader regional pattern in which abuse is often minimised, justified or hidden until it turns fatal.

In Nigeria, that pattern has increasingly been challenged—most notably in a landmark ruling delivered in September 2025 by an Upper Customary Court in Kafanchan, Kaduna State.

In the case of Talatu Williams v. Williams Sunday, the court ruled that leaving a violent marriage is not only acceptable but necessary when life is at risk. The judgment affirmed that parental support for a married child facing abuse does not amount to interference when the marriage has become dangerous.

“If a woman is killed in marriage, the husband will remarry,” the presiding judge, Emmanuel Samaila, said. “But a mother will lose her child forever.”

The court also rejected religious and cultural justifications for silence, stressing that bride price does not confer ownership and that faith cannot be used to excuse abuse.

“The token paid as bride price is not a purchase price,” the ruling stated. “Marriage is not a licence to treat another adult like a child or a slave.”

Choosing Life Over Silence

Taken together, the Zambia killing, the Nigerian viral account and the court’s ruling point to a gradual but significant shift—particularly among women—toward redefining marriage not as endurance at all costs, but as a partnership that must be safe, dignified and humane.

For advocates, the message is increasingly clear: silence protects abusers, while survival often begins with the courage to walk away.

As governments across the region struggle to curb gender-based violence, these stories underscore a hard truth long ignored—leaving alive is not failure. It is, increasingly, an act of resistance.

Unacceptable Betrayal’: Legal, rights leaders slam Nigeria over Kaduna kidnappings

The abduction of more than 170 Christian worshippers in Kaduna State has thrust Nigeria back under international and domestic scrutiny, with rights advocates accusing authorities of denial, failed accountability and enabling the growing confidence of armed groups.

Prominent human rights lawyer and Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), and a six-year United Nations Special Rapporteur on Trafficking Persons in Africa,  Prof. Joy Ezeilo, has joined a chorus of voices condemning the initial response of Nigerian authorities, particularly the police, who first denied that any mass abduction had taken place despite eyewitness accounts and community reports.

“The attempt to conceal the abduction of more than 150 Christian worshippers represents an unacceptable betrayal of public trust and a blatant disregard for accountability,” Ezeilo said. “This persistent denial cannot be tolerated.”

Ezeilo called on Nigeria’s National Assembly to invoke its constitutional oversight powers and launch a full investigation into the incident, warning that failure to hold state actors accountable would further embolden criminal groups and deepen insecurity nationwide.

“Without genuine accountability,” she said, “state actors risk enabling criminals to continue their reign of terror and impunity across our communities.”

From Denial to Confirmation

The abductions, which occurred during church services in Kaduna State, were initially dismissed by both the Kaduna State Government and the Nigeria Police Force. Authorities later confirmed the incident after public pressure mounted and lists of victims’ names circulated widely on social media.

According to sources familiar with negotiations, the kidnappers are demanding the return of 17 motorcycles—valued at approximately ₦28.9 million—allegedly seized during recent military operations. Security analysts say the demand reflects the increasing boldness and operational confidence of armed groups in northern Nigeria.

 U.S. Raises Alarm

The Kaduna abductions featured prominently during a high-level United States–Nigeria Working Group meeting in Abuja, where U.S. Under Secretary for Political Affairs Allison Hooker warned that persistent attacks on religious communities threaten Nigeria’s security gains and public confidence.

“Persistent attacks on religious communities undermine security gains and public confidence,” Hooker said. “We are here to discuss how we can work together to deter violence against Christian communities, investigate attacks, hold perpetrators accountable, and reduce killings, forced displacements and abductions, particularly in the North Central states.”

While noting recent releases of abducted Christians, including 38 worshippers kidnapped in Kwara State and 265 students from St. Mary’s Catholic School, Hooker said the Kaduna incident raised serious concerns about the adequacy of Nigeria’s security response and the protection of religious freedom.

She added that progress on religious liberty and civilian safety would strengthen bilateral relations, affecting trade, health cooperation, counterterrorism efforts and the return of internally displaced persons.

 Government Assurances Meet Public Scepticism

Nigeria’s National Security Adviser, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, acknowledged the scale of the crisis and pledged intensified military and law-enforcement operations. He described religiously motivated violence as “unacceptable” and vowed that such attacks would be treated as assaults on the Nigerian state.

“Nigeria is a deeply plural society, and the protection of all citizens—Christians, Muslims and others—is non-negotiable,” Ribadu said.

He disclosed that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu had authorised expanded security deployments, improved intelligence coordination and comprehensive investigations into attacks on religious communities.

Yet civil society leaders and rights advocates say these assurances contrast sharply with realities on the ground.

Allegations of Systemic Failure

In a widely circulated statement, human rights lawyer and former chairman of Nigeria’s National Human Rights Commission, Prof. Chidi Odinkalu, described the Kaduna abductions as evidence of systemic failure—and possibly official complicity.

“Kaduna is the most garrisoned state in Nigeria,” Odinkalu wrote. “It takes some form of official complicity for this level of mass abduction to happen without resistance.”

Odinkalu criticised the police for denying the incident for more than 48 hours without investigation, arguing that the delay squandered critical time in locating the abductees. He also linked the denial to what he described as an effort to counter international allegations of targeted violence against Christians through narrative management rather than accountability.

Local lists compiled after the attack indicate that entire families were abducted, including 13 members of one household and more than 10 from several others.

“These were citizens—human beings who went for routine worship,” Odinkalu said. “They had a right to expect better from their government and the police.”

 A Defining Test

As pressure mounts from Washington and international human rights groups, the Kaduna abductions have become a defining test of Nigeria’s commitment to transparency, civilian protection and the rule of law, highlighting the widening gulf between official rhetoric and the lived reality of communities trapped in the country’s deepening security crisis.

FULL LIST OF 177 KIDNAPPED PERSONS

                1.            Samson Naallah

                2.            Edisid Naallah

                3.            Christopher Naallah

                4.            Martin Samson

                5.            Moses Samson

                6.            Clever Godwin

                7.            Jerusalem Chindo

                8.            Markus Makudi

                9.            Benjamin Markus

                10.          Albert Markus

                11.          Olelana Markus

                12.          Linus Markus

                13.          Hassana Linus

                14.          Ojo Bamboya

                15.          Esther Ojo

                16.          Mary Jonathan

                17.          George Jonathan

                18.          Careful Jonathan

                19.          EF James

                20.          Morin Boniface

                21.          Junior James

                22.          Happiness Jonathan

                23.          Honest Jonathan

                24.          Honesty Jonathan

                25.          Faith Luka

                26.          Beauty Luka

                27.          Junior Luka

                28.          Rosemary Luka

                29.          Dorothy Musa

                30.          Selina Nwankwo

                31.          Alice Bamboya

                32.          Magdalena Godwin

                33.          Hassan Ishaya

                34.          Lazarus Ishaya

                35.          Marta Ishaya

                36.          Zummunta Ishaya

                37.          Salvation Ishaya

                38.          Susana Linus

                39.          Jummai Linus

                40.          Peace Joshua

                41.          Zahaya Joshua

                42.          Nabilah Makudi

                43.          Hajara Makudi

                44.          Rebecca Hosea

                45.          Ahmad Ahmad

                46.          Liyu Ezekiel

                47.          Vivian Ezekiel

                48.          Goodluck Ezekiel

                49.          Beauty Ezekiel

                50.          Matina Maiyashi

                51.          Bridget Maiyashi

                52.          Vivian Linus

                53.          Mary Amos

                54.          Hamid Amos

                55.          Patricia Amos

                56.          Hamisu Amos

                57.          Luka Amos

                58.          Tacy Amos

                59.          Cynthia Amos (guessed)

                60.          Mercy Isaac

                61.          Augustine Makudi

                62.          Matthew Samaila

                63.          Adam Musa

                64.          Malika Sule

                65.          Abu Ahmad

                66.          Hussein Lucky (guessed)

                67.          Akinyi Sadiu

                68.          Dangata Amos

                69.          Helen Jonathan

                70.          Asinwa Jonathan

                71.          Faith Joseph

                72.          Gloria Kennet

                73.          Happiness Danisa

                74.          Fidelis Jacob

                75.          Tobias Markus

                76.          Istu Paul

                77.          Hassana Paul

                78.          Charity Chindo

                79.          Christiana Danisa

                80.          Everest Danima

                81.          Thomas Philip

                82.          Catrina Danbosi

                83.          Halima Hassan

                84.          Hassan Lukumi

                85.          Mary Sadiu

                86.          Franca John

                87.          Henry Danbiyi

                88.          Genesis Lawal

                89.          Ayuba Lawal

                90.          Solomon Ayuba

                91.          Theophilus Danlami (guessed)

                92.          Charles Sambo

                93.          Rahila Charles

                94.          Gambo Danisa

                95.          Talent Danisa

                96.          Nehemiah Danjuma

                97.          Maijima Shekarau

                98.          Matina Maijima

                99.          Laraba Maijima

                100.        Musa Danjuma

                101.        Ishaya Danima

                102.        Lulu Danisa

                103.        Clement Ahmad

                104.        Destiny Ahmad

                105.        Nehemiah Ishaya

                106.        Simon Ishaya

                107.        Nasty Muku

                108.        Helena Joseph

                109.        Joseph Bawa

                110.        Sarah Joseph

                111.        Bulus Mariya

                112.        Musa Samaila

                113.        Bulus Bawa

                114.        Halima Bawa

                115.        Beture Hosea

                116.        Sati Hosea

                117.        Titus John

                118.        Dogara Bawa

                119.        Lories Bawa

                120.        Adamu Aminu

                121.        Ezekiel Adamu

                122.        Tenah Markus

                123.        Tina Danbosi

                124.        Patricio Bawa

                125.        Janet Tsuda

                126.        Amina Danjuma

                127.        Sandra Danbosi

                128.        Bridget Sunday

                129.        Saphat Innocent (guessed)

                130.        Alex Sunday

                131.        Beauty Peter

                132.        Samisa Paul

                133.        Joy Joseph

                134.        Methole Johanna

                135.        Genesis Johanna

                136.        Maria Johanna

                137.        Merozdu Adonu

                138.        Karimi Jangbe

                139.        Sunday Martela

                140.        Santina Hershinga

                141.        Keuna Michael

                142.        Hassan Bulus

                143.        Marzeta Maisoni

                144.        Mainwa Dominic

                145.        Godwin Karimi

                146.        Amos Akijo

                147.        Nathan Amos

                148.        Joseph Chindo

                149.        Lydia Godwin

                150.        Hamna Maiyangi

                151.        Toletu Maiyangi

                152.        Esther Godday

                153.        Godswill Godday

                154.        Godlive Samson

                155.        Goodluck Aliga

                156.        Madaki Tabawa

                157.        Tabawa Abba

                158.        Tabawa Iyamye

                159.        Samuel Amos

                160.        Daniel Amos

                161.        Deborah Amos

                162.        Ruth Amos

                163.        Emmanuel Danjuma

                164.        Joshua Danjuma

                165.        Rejoice Danisa

                166.        Blessing Danisa

                167.        Ibrahim Lawal

                168.        Zainab Lawal

                169.        Sadiq Ahmad

                170.        Aisha Ahmad

                171.        Yakubu Musa

                172.        Suleiman Musa

                173.        Rahama Musa

                174.        Daniel Jonathan

                175.        Samuel Jonathan

                176.        Peter Jonathan

                177.        Grace Jonathan

Anne Hathaway, Donatella Versace and Tom Ford lead fashion world in final farewell to Valentino Garavani in Rome

Anne Hathaway, Donatella Versace and Tom Ford cut sombre figures as they led the mourners paying tribute to Valentino Garavani at his funeral in Rome on Friday. 

The iconic fashion designer died on Monday, aged ​93 ​, surrounded by his loved ones, at his home in the Italian capital. 

Taking place at the Basilica of Saint Mary of the Angels and Martyrs in Rome, celebrities set out to pay tribute to the much-loved designer. 

Amongst the first to arrive was Anne, 43, who met Valentino on the set of her hit film The Devil Wears Prada. He famously made a cameo as himself in the 2006 comedy during a Paris Fashion Week scene. 

Click here to continue reading.

NBA suspends Garki Chairman over ‘award’ to convicted pension thief, as ethics storm erupts

Nigeria’s legal profession has been thrown into turmoil after the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) moved swiftly to disown and discipline officials of its Garki Branch over a controversial event allegedly honouring Abdulrasheed Maina, a former public official convicted of stealing more than ₦2 billion in pension funds.

    The crisis erupted after a viral video surfaced online purporting to show a press conference and award ceremony in which Maina was named “Grand Patron” of the NBA Garki Branch. The footage sparked widespread outrage, with critics accusing the Bar of legitimising corruption and undermining public confidence in the justice system.

    In a strongly worded statement, the Executive Committee of the NBA Garki Branch categorically denied authorising or sanctioning any such event, describing the video as a complete surprise to its leadership.

    “The purported news conference and award presentation ceremony was never discussed, approved, or sanctioned,” the branch said, stressing that neither its executive officers nor its general membership had prior knowledge of the event.

    The branch warned that honouring an individual whose criminal conviction remains the subject of ongoing appellate proceedings would amount to prejudging a matter that is sub judice—a violation of both legal ethics and the Bar’s commitment to the rule of law.

    Chairman Suspended, Probe Launched

    Following an emergency meeting held on January 23, the branch suspended its Chairman, Anthony Bamidele Ojo, pending a formal investigation into the incident. An ad hoc committee, headed by senior member Barnabas Oswald Kwamkur, was constituted to probe the circumstances surrounding the alleged conference and award.

    Vice-Chairman Lydia Izan has since assumed leadership of the branch in an acting capacity.

    The NBA Garki Branch urged members of the legal community and the public to disregard the event entirely, emphasising that it had no institutional backing and did not reflect the values of the Association.

    National NBA Condemns ‘Putrid Actions’

    The controversy escalated when the national leadership of the Nigerian Bar Association weighed in, issuing a blistering condemnation of the purported appointment of Maina as “Grand Patron.”

    NBA President, Mazi Afam Osigwe, SAN, described the action as “reprehensible” and damaging to the integrity of the legal profession.

    “The Bar will not, under any guise, lend its platform, name, or institutional credibility to influence public opinion or judicial proceedings,” Osigwe said. “Any attempt to do so constitutes a grave violation of professional ethics and a direct affront to the rule of law.”

    The NBA directed Ojo to immediately withdraw any purported appointment of Maina and to cease issuing statements or representations in support of any litigant with cases pending before the courts.

    The Association announced that disciplinary proceedings would be initiated against the Garki Branch Chairman, citing breaches of the NBA Constitution, the Rules of Professional Conduct, and core professional values.

    Chairman Defends Actions, Later Distances Branch

    In his own statement, Ojo sought to justify the engagement, saying representatives of Maina had approached the branch offering support for criminal justice reform initiatives. He claimed the recognition was a limited patronage acknowledgement tied solely to reform advocacy and not an endorsement of Maina’s past conduct or legal battles.

    However, Ojo acknowledged that he was not fully aware of the procedural status of Maina’s criminal case at the time and conceded that greater caution should have been exercised.

    Facing mounting backlash and institutional pushback, the branch ultimately distanced itself from both the award and any association with Maina, reaffirming its commitment to ethical clarity and judicial integrity.

    “The integrity of the Branch and the legal profession remains non-negotiable,” the statement said, pledging corrective measures.

    A Broader Credibility Test

    The episode has become a flashpoint in Nigeria’s ongoing struggle with corruption, accountability, and public trust in institutions meant to uphold justice. Legal analysts say the incident underscores the heightened scrutiny facing professional bodies—and the reputational cost of even perceived alignment with convicted figures.

    For the Nigerian Bar Association, the fallout represents not just an internal disciplinary matter, but a public test of its stated mission to defend the rule of law in a country where that principle is increasingly under strain.

    TIPS