Home Blog Page 127

Alleged Assault On Magistrate: Court orders arrest and remand of Ondo Women Affairs Commissioner

A Magistrates’ Court in Akure, the Ondo State capital, has ordered the arrest of the state Commissioner for Women Affairs, Mrs Seun Osamaye, over an alleged assault on a Chief Magistrate, Mrs Temitope Alphonso.

The arrest order followed the commissioner’s failure to appear in court to answer charges bordering on assault, intimidation and threats to life allegedly committed against the Chief Magistrate.

According to court documents, the incident occurred at the premises of the Ministry of Women Affairs while Chief Magistrate Alphonso was on an official engagement with the ministry’s Permanent Secretary, in the presence of staff members.

In an affidavit attached to the charge, Magistrate Alphonso alleged that the confrontation stemmed from a judgment she earlier delivered, which was unfavourable to the commissioner.

She claimed the commissioner reacted by verbally abusing and physically assaulting her.

Meanwhile, when she asked Mrs Osamaye to stop cursing her, the commissioner allegedly ordered her to shut up, describing her as a mere magistrate and boasting that even the Chief Judge of Ondo State could not question her.

The magistrate further alleged that the commissioner threatened her life, warning her to watch her back and claiming she had all the apparatus to make her go missing if she was not careful.

She reportedly beat her chest while making the threats and claimed that neither the governor nor the Chief Judge would be able to rescue the magistrate.

The affidavit read, “That when I asked her to stop cursing, the defendant told me to shut up and said I was just a mere Magistrate, adding that even the Chief Judge of Ondo State cannot open his mouth when she is talking.

“The defendant further warned me to watch my back, claiming she had all the apparatus to make me go missing if I was not careful. She beat her chest while making the threat.

“She also stated that by the time she was finished with me, the Governor of Ondo State would not be able to rescue me, let alone the Chief Judge.”

At the hearing on Wednesday, the commissioner was absent from court.

Her counsel, Barrister Adewusi, told the court that she was undergoing medical treatment at a hospital in Ilara-Mokin and requested a stand-down to enable him present evidence of her hospitalisation.

The presiding Magistrate, Damilola Sekoni, granted a one-and-a-half-hour stand-down and ruled that the commissioner must appear in court or face consequences.

When the case resumed, the defence presented a medical report, but it was immediately challenged by the prosecuting counsel, who questioned its authenticity.

In his ruling, Magistrate Sekoni rejected the medical report, describing it as unsatisfactory and lacking essential details such as the date and time of admission, as well as proof that the commissioner was medically unfit to attend court.

The court noted that the document failed to show that Mrs Osamaye was admitted and described it as hastily prepared.

The court noted the commissioner’s blatant disregard for its authority and consequently ordered her arrest and remand in prison custody.

The case has been adjourned to 12 January 2026 for further hearing.

Sahara Reporters

How Prince Harry surprised California firefighters with a quiet pre-Christmas visit

Alesandra Dubin writes:

I live in Los Angeles, and 2025 started out just plain awful for us here. January’s fires came on fast and were utterly unrelenting until thousands of homes and businesses were destroyed. Although that conflagration was on a historic scale, huge Southern California wildfires now arrive with numbing regularity amid the climate emergency.

At one point in January, flames came within feet of destroying my parents’ house while they were evacuated. Fire incinerated all the foliage along their fence, and for thousands of acres behind that. Their home was saved only by the intense, round-the-clock efforts of firefighters working both in the air and on the ground.

That’s why Prince Harry’s surprise pre-Christmas visit gave me — and many of us around here — a special pride and joy. According to Instagram, Harry spent time at the Ventura Training Center of the Anti-Recidivism Coalition in Camarillo, meeting formerly incarcerated firefighters who protected California communities during wildfire season and are now building long-term careers in fire service.

Beyond just his affinity for surfing the Pacific waves, this visit showed Harry is really participating in the community in which he now lives with Meghan Markle and their children.

The Anti-Recidivism Coalition shared photos from the visit with a caption that emphasized service, healing, and reentry support, writing that the firefighters’ “pride, leadership, and commitment are a testament to what’s possible when opportunity meets purpose.” The replies filled with gratitude:

“The best day,” one commenter wrote. Another added, “This is so dope,” using the proper Southern California parlance.

A third wrote, “Thank you for continuing to advocate for mental health & reentry support, Prince Harry! #ShowUpDoGood,” using the motto of the Prince’s Archewell organization.

Close to 30 percent of California’s wildfire force has included incarcerated firefighters — people doing some of the most dangerous, physically grueling work imaginable for cents an hour. Programs like ARC help make sure that service on the fire line can translate into stability, dignity, and real opportunity after release.

For those of us living in California, where fire season shapes everything from housing anxiety to holiday plans, Harry’s attention is meaningful. If becoming a Californian means understanding that wildfires are personal, that firefighters are sacred, and that second chances matter — then yes, he’s one of us now. And I, for one, am happy to have him.

https://www.yahoo.com/creators/lifestyle/story/prince-harrys-latest-surprise-appearance-shows-hes-a-real-californian-now-200809027.html

Viral cleric condemns Christmas as sinful as Emir of Kano celebrates holiday in Abia

A viral video of an unnamed Nigerian cleric warning Muslims against participating in Christmas celebrations has reignited debate over religion and national cohesion—just as the Emir of Kano, Muhammadu Sanusi II, publicly marked the holiday in southeastern Nigeria.

The cleric, in a 20-second video circulated widely on Christmas Day, described Christmas celebrations as sinful for Muslims, claiming participation amounted to denying Allah and would lead to hell. The clip sparked backlash online, with critics accusing the preacher of promoting intolerance in an already polarised country.

In sharp contrast, the Emir of Kano spent Christmas in Abia State, where he attended the 2025 Atani Day celebration in Arochukwu Local Government Area alongside Governor Alex Otti. Sanusi praised Otti’s administration and urged Nigerians to strengthen interethnic and interreligious ties.

Speaking at the event on December 25, Sanusi said Abia’s transformation under Otti had drawn attention well beyond the state and Nigeria.

“Even outside Abia and outside Nigeria, people have taken note of the great transformation of the last two years,” the emir said, congratulating the governor and offering prayers for continued progress. He also disclosed that he serves on Otti’s international economic advisory council.

Sanusi, who arrived in Abia on December 23, commended the cultural displays at the celebration and called for unity across Nigeria’s regional and religious divides.

“I hope we will continue to build bridges across the Niger, hold hands, and remain brothers and sisters—citizens of one great country,” he said, recalling his decades-long friendship with Otti dating back to their banking careers.

Governor Otti, in his remarks, described the emir as a close friend of more than 20 years and praised his resilience amid past political and institutional challenges.

“Sometimes, when people politicise ethnicity and religion, it’s because they have no argument,” Otti said, adding that Sanusi’s personal journey—from former Central Bank governor to emir—offered lessons in courage and steadfastness.

Otti also used the occasion to defend his administration’s record, assuring residents that his government remained focused on service delivery despite criticism and political distractions. He apologised for the disruptions caused by ongoing infrastructure projects and said contractors had been directed to speed up work.

Highlighting investments in health and education, the governor said his administration has consistently allocated between 15 and 20 percent of the state budget to both sectors. He cited the revival of Abia State College of Education (Technical), Arochukwu, noting that long-overdue salaries had been paid and accreditation restored after several years.

The Atani Day celebration featured cultural dances and was attended by traditional rulers, including the Eze Aro of Arochukwu Kingdom, community leaders, and government officials.

The contrasting moments—one amplifying religious exclusion, the other projecting interfaith harmony—underscored Nigeria’s ongoing struggle to balance deeply held beliefs with national unity.

Mr President, suspend the implementation of the controversial tax reform act pending a full probe and the gazetting of the authentic version passed by the national assembly

OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT BOLA AHMED TINUBU

By M. O. Idam, Esq.

I write as a genuine advocate of good governance, constitutionalism, and accountability in Nigeria to formally demand an immediate and thorough probe into the grave allegations raised by Hon. Abdussamad Dasuki. These allegations claim that the version of the Tax Reform Act gazetted and published after presidential assent contains material alterations when compared with the version duly debated and passed by the National Assembly. Given the seriousness of this claim and its implications for legislative integrity and the rule of law, it is imperative that a comprehensive investigation be conducted and clarity restored before any attempt at implementing the law.

The disturbing alarm which was raised on 17 December 2025 on the floor of the House of Representatives has gravely undermined confidence in the tax law sought to be implemented. Even if it does not outrightly impugn the law’s genuineness, it unquestionably casts a serious shadow of doubt over the authenticity and veracity of its contents.

Needless to say, the allegation raises a fundamental constitutional concern as to whether the law debated and passed by the National Assembly and transmitted for presidential assent is indeed the same law that was gazetted by the Clerk of the National Assembly following Your Excellency’s presidential assent.

While the foregoing issues, together with several other unresolved questions surrounding the tax law intended to be implemented, demand urgent resolution in the interest of administrative integrity, if not the rule of law, it has become necessary to suspend the implementation of the law pending a thorough probe and the gazetting of the correct version duly passed by the National Assembly and assented to by Your Excellency before such implementation.

Please accept my compliments of the season as I urge that wise and impartial counsel, free from political considerations or personal gain, should be permitted to prevail.

Yours faithfully,

M. O. Idam

Court strips states of control over UBE funds, orders direct funding for local governments

Download full judgment

A Federal High Court in Abuja has delivered a landmark judgment redefining local government autonomy and dismantling long-standing state control over basic education funds.

In a ruling delivered on October 13, 2025, Justice Emeka Nwite declared key provisions of the Universal Basic Education (UBE) Act unconstitutional, holding that Nigeria’s 774 local governments are autonomous entities entitled to direct access to federal education funding.

The suit, filed by Sesugh Akume against the Universal Basic Education Commission (UBEC) and the Attorney-General of the Federation, challenged sections 11(3) and 13(1) of the UBE Act 2004, which placed the administration and disbursement of UBE funds under State Universal Basic Education Boards (SUBEBs).

Justice Nwite ruled that those provisions violate sections 5, 7(1) and Item 2(a) of the Fourth Schedule of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), which recognise local governments as a distinct and self-governing tier of government.

“The local government system is not an appendage or extension of state government,” the court held, declaring that any law subjecting local governments or their agencies to state supervision is null and void.

The judgment effectively dismantles the legal framework that allowed states to act as gatekeepers for billions of naira in federal education grants.

Under the now-nullified provisions, UBEC funds could only be accessed through SUBEBs, which applied for and administered the grants on behalf of local governments. In practice, the court noted, many states failed to apply for the funds at all, while others retained and centrally controlled the resources.

UBEC has repeatedly confirmed that hundreds of billions of naira earmarked for basic education remain unclaimed.

Justice Nwite ordered that local governments must — not may — pay their 50 percent counterpart funding through their Local Government Education Authorities (LGEAs) and access UBE funds directly from UBEC, without interference from state agencies.

The court further directed UBEC and the Attorney-General to formally notify all 37 SUBEBs and 774 LGEAs of the ruling within three months. The deadline for compliance expires on January 14, 2026.

Beyond funding, the ruling has far-reaching administrative implications. By affirming that LGEAs are no longer subject to SUBEB supervision, the court effectively transferred responsibility for staffing, management and implementation of basic education to the local governments themselves, including the employment of teachers.

The decision comes amid a deepening education crisis. Nigeria currently has an estimated 18 million out-of-school children, according to UBEC data. Many public schools lack classrooms, teachers are owed salaries, and learning facilities are in severe disrepair — despite the existence of statutory funds designed to address those gaps.

The court’s ruling reframes the debate over local government autonomy, shifting it from a political slogan to an enforceable constitutional reality. By restoring fiscal and administrative control to the local level, the judgment aims to bring governance — and accountability — closer to the communities most affected.

Whether the ruling will translate into improved classrooms, paid teachers and increased enrolment now depends on compliance by federal agencies and the capacity of local governments to manage education delivery independently.

Click here to download the full judgment.

UBEC-Judgement

Hearty congratulations on well deserved promotion Princess Frank-Chukwuani! By Victor Pyarrap

It is with immense joy and pride that I congratulate you on your well-earned promotion to the esteemed cadre of Director in the Federal Civil Service. This is a truly remarkable milestone.

Reflecting on your journey – from your early career days with the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC), through your dedicated service at NEPAD, and beyond, this achievement stands as a powerful testament to your quiet excellence, unwavering focus, and uncommon resilience. Each step of your path has been marked by diligence, learning, dedication, integrity and principled leadership, and it is inspiring to see how your consistent commitment has culminated in this significant elevation.

Your progression exemplifies how genuine expertise and steadfast character can shape a meaningful career in public service. I have no doubt that you will bring even greater vision, wisdom, and impact to this directorial role.

May this new chapter bring you continued fulfilment, greater opportunities to inspire, and the grace to lead with your characteristic strength and compassion.

Congratulations once again on this outstanding accomplishment.

With immense pride and warm regards,

Victor Pyarrap, a former Pioneer Staff and Assistant Director, NCC.

The lawsuit that forced corporate America to reckon with environmental crimes

She was filing real estate papers when she noticed something wrong: medical records where they didn’t belong. That curiosity would expose a 30-year cover-up and win $333 million for poisoned families.

Her name was Erin Brockovich. And she proved that sometimes the most dangerous question you can ask is simply: “Why?”

It was 1993. Erin was twice divorced, raising three young children alone, and desperately trying to keep the lights on. She’d talked her way into a job as a file clerk at a small California law firm after losing a personal injury lawsuit they’d handled for her.

It was grunt work. Organizing papers. Filing documents. The kind of job where you’re not supposed to ask questions—just put things where they belong and move on.

But Erin had never been good at staying quiet.

One afternoon, she was organizing files for a pro bono real estate case. Standard stuff: property deeds, tax documents, purchase agreements for a home in a small desert town called Hinkley, California.

Then she paused.

Mixed in with the real estate papers were medical records. Blood test results. Doctor’s notes.

Why would a real estate file contain someone’s health information? Why would Pacific Gas & Electric—a utility company buying properties—need to know about residents’ medical histories?

Most people would have filed it away as a clerical error. Erin couldn’t let it go.

She drove out to Hinkley. It was a tiny town in the Mojave Desert—hot, dusty, quiet. The kind of place where everyone knew their neighbors and trusted the local industry that provided jobs.

PG&E operated a compressor station there for natural gas pipelines. For decades, the company had been a pillar of the community. They employed locals. They were good neighbors.

Or so everyone thought.

Erin started knocking on doors. She didn’t wear a suit. She didn’t use fancy legal language. She sat at kitchen tables, drank coffee, and listened.

What she heard was terrifying.

Almost every house had a story of illness. Children with chronic nosebleeds that wouldn’t stop. Mysterious rashes that appeared and disappeared. Respiratory problems. Joint pain.

And cancer. So much cancer for such a small population.

The residents were confused and scared. PG&E had told them their water contained chromium, but it was the “good kind”—like what’s in vitamins and supplements. Nothing to worry about.

Erin didn’t buy it.

She spent hours in libraries. She dug through records at the regional water board. She learned chemistry she’d never studied in school.

There are two types of chromium. Chromium-3 is a nutrient your body needs. Chromium-6—hexavalent chromium—is a toxic heavy metal used to prevent rust in industrial machinery.

It’s a carcinogen.

And PG&E had been lying.

Records showed that for over 30 years—from 1952 to 1966—the compressor station’s cooling towers had discharged wastewater containing Chromium-6 into unlined ponds. The poison seeped into the ground. It drifted into the aquifer.

It was in the water people drank. The water they bathed in. The water their children swam in.

When Erin brought this information to her boss, Ed Masry, he was skeptical. Taking on a billion-dollar utility company could destroy their small firm. PG&E had unlimited resources, armies of lawyers, and decades of experience burying problems.

But Erin had something PG&E didn’t have.

She had the trust of the people.

She went back to Hinkley again and again. She didn’t just collect data—she collected stories. She memorized the names of the children. She remembered which family had which surgery. She sat with mothers who cried about watching their kids get sick.

She became a repository of their pain.

The work was exhausting. She was still a single mother, working long hours while trying to raise three children. There were nights she wanted to quit. There were reportedly threatening phone calls telling her to stop digging.

The sheer size of the opposition was overwhelming.

PG&E was massive. They had political connections. They had scientists on retainer who would testify that the chromium levels were safe. They tried to downplay any connection between the water and the illnesses.

But Erin kept going.

She found the smoking gun—internal documents showing that PG&E headquarters had known about the contamination years before and had tried to keep it quiet. They’d deliberately misled residents about the type of chromium in the water.

She gathered over 600 plaintiffs. This wasn’t just a lawsuit anymore. It was a movement.

The legal battle was brutal. PG&E tried to bury the small firm in paperwork. They filed motion after motion trying to have the case dismissed. They made lowball settlement offers hoping people would take the money and go away.

Erin and Ed Masry held the line.

They pushed for binding arbitration—a risky strategy where a panel of judges decides the outcome with no possibility of appeal. If they lost, that was it. No second chances.

They bet everything on the truth.

In 1996, the decision came down.

The arbitrators ordered PG&E to pay $333 million.

It was the largest settlement ever paid in a direct-action lawsuit in United States history.

Six hundred and thirty-four families—mothers, fathers, children who’d been poisoned—would finally receive compensation. The money would pay for medical bills, move families out of contaminated areas, and secure futures that had been stolen by corporate negligence.

But the victory was about more than money.

It was about validation.

For years, these families had been told they were imagining things. That their illnesses were coincidental. That they should trust the company.

The settlement proved they’d been right all along.

It proved that a group of “nobodies” in a forgotten desert town could stand up to a billion-dollar corporation and win. It proved that truth, when championed by someone with enough courage, cannot be buried forever.

Erin Brockovich didn’t win because she had more legal expertise than PG&E’s lawyers. She won because she cared more.

She showed the world that you don’t need a fancy degree to know the difference between right and wrong. You don’t need credentials to recognize when something doesn’t add up.

You just need the courage to ask the hard questions—and refuse to accept easy lies.

For the people of Hinkley, Erin was more than a legal clerk. She was the one person who actually listened when everyone else looked away.

The aftermath wasn’t perfect. Hinkley today is nearly a ghost town. PG&E has spent over $750 million on cleanup efforts, but the contamination is still being addressed. Many families have left. Some who stayed still fear the water.

The scars remain.

But the precedent was set.

The case changed how America thinks about corporate environmental responsibility. It influenced water quality regulations in California and beyond. It proved that communities could fight back against pollution and win.

And it made Erin Brockovich a symbol—not because she was superhuman, but because she was ordinary.

She was a struggling single mom with no legal training who noticed something wrong and refused to turn the page.

That’s the part that matters most.

Because how many times do we see something that doesn’t make sense and just… move on? How often do we think “that’s weird” and then forget about it because we’re busy, because it’s not our problem, because surely someone more qualified is handling it?

Erin teaches us that sometimes the most important thing you can do is stop and ask: “Why?”

Why are medical records in a real estate file?

That one question—that moment of curiosity—changed 600 lives.

Think about what you might discover if you stopped filing things away and started asking why.

The 2000 film about her story, starring Julia Roberts, won an Academy Award and made Erin a household name. But she’s not interested in fame. She continues working as an environmental advocate, investigating water contamination cases across America.

Because she learned something in Hinkley that changed her forever: corporations lie when it’s profitable to lie. Systems protect the powerful. And ordinary people—people without degrees or credentials or connections—are often the only ones who will stand up and demand the truth.

“They tell you you’re not smart enough, not educated enough, not qualified enough,” she’s said. “But caring doesn’t require a degree. Noticing doesn’t require credentials.”

Erin Brockovich was a file clerk who noticed medical records where they didn’t belong.

That curiosity exposed a 30-year cover-up.

That persistence won justice for 600 families.

That courage proved that the most powerful tool against corruption isn’t a law degree—it’s a person who refuses to look away.

The next time you see something that doesn’t make sense, remember Hinkley.

Remember that one person asking “why?” can change everything.

And remember that sometimes the most dangerous opponent a corporation can face isn’t another corporation.

It’s a single mother with three kids and a question she won’t stop asking.

Credits: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EpALxxT7u/?mibextid=wwXIfr

Malami’s legal troubles spark reckoning over power, justice and impunity

Prominent public figures have reacted sharply to the arraignment of former Attorney-General of the Federation Abubakar Malami, who is facing multiple money laundering charges alongside his wife and son.

Kingsley Moghalu, a former deputy governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Chidi Odinkalu, ex-chairman of the National Human Rights Commission, and former senator Dino Melaye all weighed in on the case in separate posts on X following Malami’s court appearance on Tuesday.

Malami, who served as justice minister under former President Muhammadu Buhari, was arraigned on 16 counts bordering on alleged money laundering involving billions of naira. The charges, brought by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), have renewed debate about power, accountability, and the cyclical nature of political influence in Nigeria.

Moghalu said the case highlighted the fleeting nature of power in a system where public office is increasingly divorced from competence and ethical standards.

“Anyone taking public office in Nigeria should understand the transience of power,” Moghalu wrote. “When people carry on in office like tomorrow will never arrive, the hunters will become the hunted.”

He stressed that his comments did not amount to a judgment on Malami’s guilt, adding that the courts must be allowed to determine the outcome. Moghalu also expressed concern about the broader pattern of unresolved corruption cases, warning against another high-profile prosecution ending without accountability.

Odinkalu, a vocal human rights advocate, drew a sharp contrast between Malami’s past actions as justice minister and his current legal troubles. He recalled Malami’s role in the removal of former EFCC acting chairman Ibrahim Magu, which he said was linked to disputes over recovered assets.

“Today, Magu is living modestly in untroubled retirement,” Odinkalu wrote, noting that Malami now stands accused of looting and money laundering. He described the situation as a cautionary tale for those currently close to power and expressed hope that Malami would receive a fair trial, even if he had failed to extend the same courtesy to others while in office.

Former senator Dino Melaye also reacted, saying Malami’s arraignment revived memories of his own legal battles during Malami’s tenure as attorney-general. Melaye said he was subjected to what he described as frivolous prosecutions at the time, including the takeover of a police case against him.

“Wish him well,” Melaye wrote, reflecting on what he called a dramatic reversal of roles.

The case has attracted significant public attention, with critics framing it as emblematic of Nigeria’s long-running struggle with elite impunity and selective justice. Supporters of the prosecution, however, say the charges signal a renewed willingness by anti-graft agencies to pursue powerful figures.

Malami, his wife, and son are expected to remain in custody pending the hearing of their bail applications, as the case continues to test public confidence in Nigeria’s anti-corruption drive.

Odinkalu blasts ‘integrity test’ claims in Federal High Court judges’ selection

Former National Human Rights Commission Chairman and legal scholar, Professor Chidi Odinkalu, has rejected widespread reports claiming that dozens of applicants for judgeships at Nigeria’s Federal High Court failed integrity tests, describing the narrative as false and damaging.

In a post on his verified X account, Odinkalu said that most of the 34 candidates reportedly dropped from consideration were not disqualified on integrity grounds, but because they lacked political or judicial backing within the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC).

According to him, “the main ground on which most candidates were excluded at the level of the FJSC was that they did not have insider leverage, godfather or godmother. It had nothing to do with absence of integrity in most candidates.”

Odinkalu described the circulating claims of mass failure at the integrity screening stage as “criminal propaganda being used to tarnish the candidates.” He acknowledged that integrity petitions were filed against one or two applicants and were upheld, but stressed that “that did not affect any number remotely approaching double digits.”

Allegations of Manipulation

The rights advocate said several unsuccessful candidates have alleged that the judicial appointment process was manipulated, with claims that some shortlisted candidates failed the qualifying examination while higher-scoring applicants were excluded.

According to Odinkalu, some candidates alleged that individuals on the final shortlist of 28 scored as low as 25 or 30 percent in the computer-based and aptitude tests, while the highest-scoring candidate was reportedly dropped. The excluded candidate is alleged to be from a South-East state.

Odinkalu said such claims cannot be dismissed, noting that the FJSC and the National Judicial Council (NJC) have consistently declined to publish candidates’ scores.

“As long as the FJSC and the NJC remain unwilling to publish the scores of all the candidates, it is impossible to discount these allegations,” he said.

A History of Controversy

The FJSC recently shortlisted 28 candidates for appointment to the Federal High Court bench following a recruitment process that included a computer-based test and an aptitude assessment. While candidates are scored at each stage, the results are not made public.

Odinkalu argued that the opacity of the process has repeatedly fueled controversy. In a separate commentary, he said the current shortlist reflects entrenched favouritism, alleging that it includes children of serving or retired senior judges, some of whom were involved in the appointment process.

“It is difficult not to look upon the shortlist that the NJC committee will be interviewing next month as anything other than an advertisement of nepotism and favouritism,” he wrote.

He further claimed that judicial appointments in Nigeria have become “largely performative,” designed to legitimise outcomes determined in advance, often favouring family members or protégés of powerful insiders. Odinkalu described recent reforms announced by the NJC in April 2025 as cosmetic, arguing that publishing only the names of recommended candidates does little to address deeper credibility concerns.

Call for Transparency

Odinkalu urged Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, to use the current Federal High Court recruitment exercise to restore public confidence in the judiciary.

As a first step, he said, the CJN should order the publication of all candidates’ scores at every stage of the process.

“That will reassure the public about her commitment to liberating judicial appointments in Nigeria from continuing abduction by the forces of capture, conjugality and abuse of power,” Odinkalu said.

He concluded by urging media organisations to independently verify claims about integrity failures, warning that unsubstantiated reports risk further damaging both candidates and public trust in the judicial system.

Christmas visit ends in horror as man kills childhood friend back from Europe

The Police Command in Edo said it had arrested one Amadin William for allegedly killing his Europe-based childhood friend, Eghosa Osarietinomwan, during the deceased’s house-warming ceremony in Oben community, in Edo State.

The command’s spokesperson, ASP Eno Ikoedem, confirmed the incident to newsmen on Sunday in Benin.

She said the incident occurred on December 22, shortly after Osarietinomwan, who had returned from Europe for the Yuletide, hosted family and friends at his residence.

According to her, the suspect lured the victim into a nearby bush path and attacked him with a machete.

Ikoedem said the victim sustained deep machete cuts to the neck after stepping out during the celebration.

“He was rushed to the hospital for treatment, where he was confirmed dead,” she said.

She disclosed that the suspect fled the community immediately after the attack but was later tracked and arrested in Benin City on December 27.

“The suspect, after committing the crime, absconded and went into hiding but was tracked and arrested,” she added.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the killing triggered anger in the community, with youths allegedly setting the suspect’s house ablaze in retaliation.

The police spokesperson confirmed that two persons have also been arrested in connection with the arson.

Ikoedem said investigations were ongoing and assured that all those found culpable would be prosecuted in accordance with the law. (NAN)

TIPS