Home Blog Page 111

Norman Borlaug: The man who saved one billion lives

He saved one billion lives. You’ve never heard his name. His name was Norman Borlaug, and he might be the most important person you’ve never learned about in school.

In the 1960s, while the world feared nuclear annihilation and watched the space race, a quiet catastrophe was unfolding: mass starvation. Experts predicted that hundreds of millions in India, Pakistan, and Mexico would die of hunger. The population was growing faster than food production. Famine seemed inevitable.

Norman Borlaug, a plant scientist from Iowa, thought that was unacceptable.
He’d spent years in Mexico developing something revolutionary: wheat varieties that were disease-resistant, high-yielding, and could grow in harsh conditions. While other scientists worked in comfortable university labs, Borlaug worked in fields, his hands in the dirt, crossing wheat varieties over and over until he created something that could feed the world. But creating the wheat was only the first battle.

Read Also: Norman Borlaug, Agricultural scientist who averted famine with a controversial ‘Green revolution’

In 1965, Borlaug tried to send his wheat seeds to India and Pakistan—two countries on the brink of famine and, inconveniently, on the brink of war with each other. Bureaucrats blocked him. Governments hesitated. Scientists criticised his methods. Officials said his approach was too simple, too American, wouldn’t work in their soil. People were starving, and paperwork was stopping the solution.

Borlaug didn’t give up. He pushed, argued, called in favours, and refused to accept no for an answer. Finally, in 1965, he managed to get 550 tons of seeds shipped to India and Pakistan. Then the seeds got stuck at customs. During a war. As famine spread.

Borlaug flew to the border himself and personally negotiated to get trucks through war zones to deliver seeds to farmers. The results were extraordinary.

Within three years, Pakistan’s wheat production doubled. India, which had been importing 10 million tons of wheat annually, became self-sufficient by 1974. Mexico, where Borlaug started his work, went from importing half its wheat to exporting half a million tons.
The transformation was so dramatic that it earned a name: The Green Revolution.

But here’s what makes this story remarkable: Borlaug didn’t stop with wheat. He trained thousands of scientists and agronomists from developing countries, teaching them his methods so they could adapt his techniques to their own crops and conditions. He created a multiplier effect—his knowledge spread through people, not just through seeds.
By the time Norman Borlaug died in 2009 at age 95, studies estimated his work had saved more than one billion people from starvation.
One billion.

That’s more than one in seven people alive today.
In 1970, he won the Nobel Peace Prize. The Nobel committee called him “the man who saved more lives than any other person who has ever lived.”
And yet, most people have no idea who he was.

There are no movies about Norman Borlaug. Few schools teach his story. He never became a household name. While we memorise the names of generals and politicians, the man who saved a billion lives remains virtually unknown.

When asked about his lack of fame, Borlaug said he didn’t mind. He wasn’t interested in celebrity. He was interested in feeding people.

Even in his 90s, he continued working, travelling to Africa to help farmers there improve their yields. He never retired from the mission of ending hunger.
There’s something profound about the fact that the person who saved more lives than anyone in history is someone most of us have never heard of. It says something about what we value, what we remember, what we teach.

We build statues to warriors. We name airports after politicians. We make movies about inventors of weapons. And the man who fed a billion people worked in fields until he was 95, mostly forgotten.

Norman Borlaug proved that one person with knowledge, determination, and refusal to accept bureaucratic nonsense could change the trajectory of human history.
He didn’t invent a weapon. He didn’t conquer territory. He didn’t accumulate wealth.
He just refused to let people starve when he knew there was a solution.

One billion people lived because of him. One billion childhoods, educations, families, futures—all possible because a plant scientist from Iowa decided that famine was a solvable problem and then refused to stop until he solved it.

The next time you eat bread, think about Norman Borlaug.
The man who saved a billion lives and never asked for anything in return.

#NormanBorlaug

#ForgottenHeroes

https://www.facebook.com/share/17KM4PjXXR/?mibextid=wwXIfr

What is the argument surrounding ‘RATEL’?

By M.O.Idam, Esq.

‘RATEL’ TRADE NAME REGISTRATION: WHO HAS THE RIGHT TO SUE FOR INFRINGEMENT—THE ANIMAL THAT ORIGINALLY OWNED THE NAME, THE UNREGISTERED USER OR THE REGISTERED USER?

What is Ratel?

A Ratel is another name for a Honey Badger. A small but very tough animal found in Africa and some parts of Asia.

What is Trade Mark?

Under the Trade Marks Act (Cap. T13, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria), a “trade mark” is defined (in essence) as:

A mark used or proposed to be used in relation to goods for the purpose of indicating, or to indicate, a connection in the course of trade between the goods and some person having the right either as proprietor or as registered user to use the mark, whether with or without any indication of the identity of that person.

A Trademark is any distinctive sign, word, logo, design, sign or colour, or even smell that identifies your services, product and separates it from competitors.

A mark may qualify for registration if it is unique, not deceptive, scandalous, or illegal.

However, an animal name that is common or popular—such as cow, goat, or horse—may not be registrable as a trademark for certain goods or services because of its generic nature and lack of distinctiveness.

Conversely, names of animals such as Jaguar, Tiger, Ratel and Leopard may qualify for registration where they are distinctive, uncommon, and not identical or confusingly similar to an existing registered mark.

Interestingly, once a mark—whether relating to an animal or an inanimate object—is registered in respect of particular goods or services, it becomes unavailable for subsequent registration in respect of the same or similar goods or services. This principle was illustrated in Niger Chemists Ltd v Nigeria Chemists Ltd (1961) All NLR 171, where two companies dealing in pharmaceutical products bore similar names. The court restrained the latter company, Nigeria Chemists Ltd, on the ground that its name was confusingly similar to Niger Chemists Ltd and likely to mislead the public.

In Fredo (Ferodo) Ltd v Ibeto Industries Ltd (2004) 5 NWLR (Pt. 866) 317, Ferodo Ltd was the registered proprietor of a trademark in respect of brake linings. Ibeto Industries later used a confusingly similar mark on identical products. The Supreme Court held that registration confers exclusive rights on the proprietor, and that no other person may register or use an identical or deceptively similar mark in respect of the same or similar goods.

However, while the Trade Marks Act confers on a registered proprietor the exclusive right to use and maintain legal control over a registered mark or name, the Act also preserves the right of an unregistered user who has built goodwill in a mark or name to maintain an action for passing off against an unauthorised user.

To succeed, such a claimant must prove that he has acquired goodwill in the mark or name, that there has been a misrepresentation by the defendant, and that such misrepresentation has caused or is likely to cause him damage. See section 3 of the Act, which provides that; No person shall be entitled to institute any proceeding to prevent, or to recover damages for, the infringement of an unregistered trade mark; but nothing in this Act shall be taken to affect rights of action against any person for passing off goods as the goods of another person or the remedies in respect thereof.

CONCLUSION:

Ratel may be registered as a trade name for other goods and services, provided it is not confusingly similar to an existing mark in the same or related class and is sufficiently distinctive to identify the applicant’s goods or services.

M.O.Idam

Walking Away Alive: Why one Nigerian woman cancelled her wedding and sparked a national reckoning

A Nigerian woman has sparked a fierce national conversation about marriage, gender-based violence and personal safety after revealing why she abruptly called off her wedding, less than 24 hours after visiting her fiancé’s family home for a formal introduction.

In a deeply personal account that has since gone viral on social media, the woman said a single night in the household shattered her expectations of marriage and exposed what she described as a dangerous culture of silence around domestic abuse.

According to her, the visit initially appeared uneventful. But late at night, she began hearing disturbing sounds from another part of the house. She soon realised that her fiancé’s father was violently assaulting his wife—an attack she described as severe, degrading and terrifying.

What unsettled her most, she said, was not only the violence itself but the response of those who witnessed it.

The household reportedly includes five children—two married daughters and three sons—yet none intervened. Her fiancé, she said, was among those who remained passive, behaving as though the assault was routine.

When she attempted to express concern, she alleged that her fiancé stopped her, warning her not to interfere. He reportedly dismissed the incident as his mother’s fault, describing her as “stubborn” and prone to exaggeration. That night, she said, her prospective mother-in-law was forced to sleep outside, while the rest of the family treated the episode as normal.

“At that moment, reality hit me,” the woman wrote. “If a man can justify abuse against his own mother, what would stop him from doing the same to his wife?”

By morning, she decided to leave. Upon returning home, she informed her fiancé that he should no longer visit her family and formally ended the engagement. She said she felt no regret, choosing safety, peace of mind and self-respect over societal pressure to proceed with the wedding.

Her story has triggered intense debate online. While many praised her decisiveness and courage, others questioned whether ending the relationship was too extreme—an exchange that has laid bare Nigeria’s ongoing struggle with deeply rooted attitudes toward domestic violence and marriage.

A Wider Pattern—and a Legal Shift

The episode comes amid growing concern over the rise of gender-based violence in Nigeria, where domestic abuse is frequently minimised, justified or treated as a private family matter until it becomes fatal.

In September 2025, an Upper Customary Court in Kafanchan, Kaduna State, issued a landmark ruling reinforcing the idea that leaving a toxic marriage is not only acceptable but necessary when life is at risk.

Delivering judgment in the case between Talatu Williams and Williams Sunday, the court held that parental support for a married child facing violence does not amount to undue interference, especially when the marriage has become life-threatening.

His Worship Emmanuel Samaila commended Talatu’s mother for choosing to receive her daughter back rather than risk her death in a violent marriage that had already left her physically injured and her children emotionally traumatised.

“If a woman is killed in marriage, the husband will remarry,” the judge noted. “But a mother will lose her child forever.”

The court also condemned the failure of the respondent’s parents to intervene despite repeated distress calls, stressing that a daughter-in-law is not a symbolic title but a moral responsibility.

“A deep religious conviction is not a licence to turn a blind eye to domestic violence,” the court ruled, rejecting the use of faith as justification for silence. “The Bible does not justify violence. Marriage is not a licence to treat another adult like a child or a slave.”

In one of the ruling’s most striking passages, the judge emphasised that bride price does not confer ownership.

“The token paid as bride price is not a purchase price,” the court stated. “It does not grant a man the right to brutalise or discard a woman at will.”

Choosing Life Over Social Approval

Taken together, the viral account and the court’s ruling highlight a growing shift, particularly among women, toward redefining marriage not as endurance at all costs, but as a partnership that must be safe, dignified and humane.

For advocates, the message is increasingly clear: walking away alive from a toxic relationship or marriage is not failure—it is wisdom.

As Nigeria grapples with persistent gender-based violence, these stories underscore a hard truth long ignored: silence protects abusers, while survival often begins with the courage to leave.

Speeches, Statistics, and Broken Clinics: Nigeria’s primary healthcare is crumbling

By Lillian Okenwa

Nigeria’s primary healthcare system is facing renewed scrutiny as the civic technology group MonITNG warns that official speeches, reform launches, and optimistic statistics are concealing a worsening crisis—one defined by abandoned clinics, unsafe facilities, and communities forced to choose between dangerous care and no care at all.

In a report released Thursday, MonITNG described Umuoma Primary Health Centre (PHC) in Nekede, Imo State, as a “disturbing example of the collapse of primary healthcare,” despite repeated budgetary allocations running into billions of naira.

According to the organisation, more than 64 percent of primary healthcare facilities across Imo State are reportedly in ruins, a reality that starkly contradicts official assurances of progress in the health sector.

“When the Tracka team visited Umuoma community, we discovered the shocking and terrible state of this facility,” the report said. “Umuoma PHC is structurally unsafe and clearly unfit for service delivery.”

MonITNG documented multiple safety hazards, including collapsed ceilings, deep cracks in the walls and the absence of perimeter fencing—conditions that expose patients, health workers and medical equipment to serious security risks, particularly at night.

Yet, residents continue to rely on the centre because it is the closest healthcare facility available.

“This reflects the desperation of communities forced to choose between unsafe care and no care at all,” the organisation noted, quoting the officer in charge of the facility, who confirmed that patients still seek treatment there daily despite the risks.

MonITNG urged the Imo State Government, Governor Hope Uzodinma, the Federal Ministry of Health, the National Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA) and the Coordinating Minister of Health, Professor Muhammad Pate, to prioritise urgent reconstruction, proper staffing and equipment of the centre.

“Healthcare is a basic right. The people of Imo State deserve better,” the report stressed.

A Pattern Repeated Across States

Imo is not alone.

In Akpaka community, Ngbo, Ohaukwu Local Government Area of Ebonyi State, more than 3,000 residents face escalating health risks after their only public PHC was abandoned over four years ago—an ordeal MonITNG described as a “clear failure of governance.”

The organisation said the facility has remained in a shocking state of decay despite repeated notifications to elected officials and government agencies.

“The total neglect of the only primary health care centre in Akpaka community is a serious threat to human lives,” the report stated.

Rooms, beds and mattresses are damaged beyond use, the facility lacks qualified doctors and nurses, and basic medical equipment is non-existent. The building itself is unsafe, with broken roofing, collapsing ceilings and dilapidated walls.

Perhaps most alarming, pregnant women are reportedly forced to give birth by lantern light, without electricity, sterilised equipment or skilled attendants—conditions widely considered preventable in a functioning health system.

Residents seeking routine care must travel long distances or turn to expensive private clinics, deepening inequality and excluding the poorest from essential services.

Rights advocates argue the situation raises constitutional concerns. Section 14(2)(b) of Nigeria’s 1999 Constitution states that “the security and welfare of the people shall be the primary purpose of government”—a provision critics say is being routinely violated.

Despite formal letters submitted in December 2024 to lawmakers representing the area and repeated follow-ups throughout 2025, MonITNG said no meaningful action has been taken.

“For three years, concerns have been documented and escalated,” the organisation said. “Yet the silence from those in power has been deafening.”

Promises vs. Reality

The warnings come even as the federal government projects optimism.

Last weekend in Abuja, Professor Muhammad Pate, Nigeria’s Coordinating Minister of Health and Social Welfare, announced a 17 percent reduction in maternal deaths in selected local government areas under the Nigeria Health Sector Renewal Investment Initiative (NHSRII).

The figures were unveiled at the launch of the Built for Her Foundation, with officials describing the moment as evidence that reforms are working.

“The health of women and girls is inseparable from the future of our nation,” Pate said, describing maternal mortality as a “systems challenge.”

But health analysts caution that progress in pilot areas does not erase the reality facing millions of Nigerians dependent on broken primary healthcare facilities.

Across rural Nigeria—where maternal mortality is highest—clinics remain understaffed, poorly equipped and chronically neglected. Even in urban government hospitals, shortages of supplies, diagnostic tools and skilled personnel persist, forcing women to delay care or seek unsafe alternatives.

“The contradiction is glaring,” said a public health analyst familiar with MonITNG’s work. “You hear speeches about reform and innovation, but on the ground, roofs are collapsing and women are delivering babies with lanterns.”

A Fragile Reform Narrative

While partnerships with foundations and civil society groups have helped deliver targeted gains, critics warn that without sustained investment in grassroots healthcare infrastructure, Nigeria’s reform narrative risks becoming another cycle of promises without permanence.

For communities like Umuoma and Akpaka, the crisis is no longer abstract.

It is measured in unsafe buildings, preventable deaths, and a growing sense that government attention ends at press conferences, leaving citizens to navigate a broken system alone.

‘Do not detain or bring suspects out of the cell half-naked’, Security Situation Room tells Nigerian security agencies

A Statement Issued by the Convener of the Security Situation Room -Douglas Ogbankwa Esq. on Tuesday the 20th January ,2026, states that :

The Security Situation Room observes with concern the practice of some Nigerian Security Agencies stripping Citizens half naked when they are detained and when they are brought out from the cell.This development is contrary to the express provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,1999 (As Amended).

The citizenship of Nigerians is not suspended during arrests, and a suspect has all the full rights of a citizen.A suspect has a right to be treated with the dignity of human person.He or she should be properly clothed and wear his or her shoes or slippers when being brought out of the cell or being arraigned in Court.

Investigating Officers and their Team Leaders should be aware of the Anti-Torture Act,2020, which makes Investigating Police Officers personally liable of any case of torture.

The Administration of Criminal Justice Laws and the Federal Act,also gives citizens the right of cause of action to sue investigating officers in their personal capacities if they are seen or found to have falted in their duties in any way “

Kanu Jailed, Bandits Free: Nigeria faces fresh accusations of selective justice

By Ladidi Sabo

Nigeria’s long-running debate over selective justice and uneven law enforcement has resurfaced after a senior opposition figure questioned why the federal government has relentlessly pursued separatist leader Nnamdi Kanu while some of the country’s most notorious bandit kingpins remain at large.

The Chairman of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) in Kano State, Alhaji Musa Ungoggo, accused the All Progressives Congress (APC)-led Federal Government of applying the law based on political and regional calculations rather than national security priorities.

Speaking to party members and supporters, Ungoggo contrasted the speed and determination with which authorities arrested, extradited, prosecuted and detained the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) with what he described as a striking lack of urgency in dealing with Bello Turji, a feared bandit leader linked to mass killings, kidnappings and large-scale displacement in Nigeria’s North-West.

“They arrested Nnamdi Kanu abroad, extradited him to Nigeria, prosecuted him, and today he remains in detention,” Ungoggo said. “That case alone shows that when the Federal Government wants to act, it can deploy its intelligence, security and legal machinery with precision and speed.”

Kanu, who has consistently framed his activism as resistance to the political and economic marginalisation of southeastern Nigeria, was arrested in 2021 and has remained in custody amid prolonged legal battles and international criticism over his detention.

Ungoggo argued that the same resolve has not been applied to Turji, who is believed to operate primarily in Shinkafi Local Government Area of Zamfara State and has been repeatedly linked by security reports and survivors’ accounts to attacks on rural communities.

“Despite countless reports of killings, abductions and destruction, Bello Turji has not been arrested or brought before a court of law,” he said. “He is still roaming freely, while innocent Nigerians continue to pay the price.”

The ADC chairman warned that the disparity sends a dangerous message—that the state is swift against political dissent but hesitant or compromised when confronting violent criminal networks.

His remarks come amid mounting concern over insecurity in the North-West, particularly in Zamfara, Katsina and parts of Kaduna, where armed groups have been accused of collecting levies, enforcing parallel authority and terrorising entire communities with little resistance.

Adding to the controversy are persistent reports, yet to be officially denied, that Katsina State has earmarked ₦300 million in its proposed 2026 budget for payments linked to negotiations with suspected bandits, a strategy critics argue amounts to rewarding mass violence while victims remain unprotected.

For Ungoggo and other critics, the contrast is stark: a separatist leader who spoke out about marginalisation is pursued across borders and held in detention, while heavily armed bandit leaders accused of bloodshed and mass terror continue to evade arrest.

“This is not just painful,” Ungoggo said. “It is dangerous. It emboldens criminals and erodes public trust in the justice system.”

As Nigeria grapples with deepening insecurity and strained national cohesion, analysts warn that perceived double standards in law enforcement risk undermining both counterterrorism efforts and confidence in the rule of law, especially in regions where violence has become a daily reality.

‘Undying Love’ Behind Bars: Prison officer jailed as staff-inmate scandals grow

A former British prison officer has been sentenced to more than three years behind bars after engaging in illicit relationships with two inmates and conspiring to smuggle drug-soaked mail into a high-security jail—another case that has reignited concerns about professionalism, boundaries, and emotional entanglement within the prison service.

Isabelle Dale, 23, was jailed for three and a half years at Southwark Crown Court after admitting to two counts of misconduct in a public office and one count of conspiring to convey a prohibited article into prison. The offences occurred between September 2021 and December 2022, while Dale was employed at HMP Coldingley in Surrey.

Read Also: She was a prison officer. He was a convicted rapist. How did she fall for him?

Read Also: Third female prison officer from the same prison jailed for ‘inappropriate relationships’ with inmate

The court heard that Dale became romantically involved with inmates Shahid Sharif and Connor Money, exploiting her position of authority while passing sensitive information and facilitating criminal activity. Sentencing her, Judge Christopher Hehir said Dale had sworn “undying love” to both men and claimed she wanted to be with them outside prison, describing her conduct as calculated and manipulative rather than naïve.

“You used your vulnerabilities as a shield and an excuse,” the judge said, adding that Dale was “thoroughly devious, untruthful and manipulative.” He went further, stating that he suspected she may have joined the prison service “with a view to becoming involved in criminal activities with prisoners.”

Read Also: After being arrested for misconduct in public office, 24-year-old female prison officer caught sneaking into a cupboard with inmate and swapping love letters admits she…

Read Also: Two female prison officers sentenced after having sexual relations with the same inmate at same time

Prosecutors told the court that Dale and Sharif became engaged within months of her joining Coldingley. Messages recovered during the investigation revealed what the judge described as a “clearly sexual relationship.” While the court did not make a definitive finding on claims that sexual contact occurred in the prison chapel, Judge Hehir noted that Dale’s colleagues had “obviously clocked on to what was going on.”

Sharif, who is currently held at HMP Wandsworth, was serving a 12-year, 10-month sentence for what the court described as an “extremely violent robbery” of a jeweller on England’s south coast. A search of Dale’s home uncovered a digitally altered image of the pair spliced together with a white heart and a date believed to mark their engagement.

Dale also maintained an intimate relationship with Connor Money, during which she passed him sensitive information. When Money warned her about a mobile phone hidden in his cell, Dale reassured him that “security aren’t too hot on you,” rather than reporting the breach, conduct the judge said demonstrated a clear betrayal of public trust.

The case also exposed a plot to smuggle drug-soaked envelopes containing spice, a synthetic cannabinoid, into HMP Swaleside on the Isle of Sheppey. Dale was to collect the envelopes from Lilea Sallis, 28, in Brighton after a postal strike disrupted initial plans. The scheme collapsed following a dispute between Sallis and Sharif over pricing and social media posts.

“I don’t think she had a fit of conscience,” Judge Hehir remarked of Sallis. “I think that’s why her enthusiasm cooled.”

Sallis was sentenced to two and a half years in prison, while Sharif, who admitted the conspiracy charge, received 27 months.

Dale’s defence argued that her actions were influenced by mental health challenges, including depression, anxiety, emotionally unstable personality disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder, claiming she was “ill-equipped” for the prison environment. The judge rejected the argument that these factors mitigated her crimes, stressing that Dale was fully aware of the risks of corruption when she took the job.

The case adds to a growing number of prosecutions involving inappropriate relationships between prison staff and inmates, a trend that experts warn undermines institutional security and public confidence in the justice system. Senior figures within the prison service have repeatedly stressed the need for clear professional boundaries, rigorous staff training, and emotional resilience, warning that personal involvement with inmates—however framed—creates serious security vulnerabilities.

Dale has since resigned from the prison service.

Nigeria is happening to us all

By Olufunke Baruwa

This is not a distant tragedy we watch on television. It is not a sad headline we scan quickly before turning the page. It is a lived reality, painfully, personally, and repeatedly, by ordinary Nigerians whose lives are cut short or irreversibly altered by systemic failures that should have been resolved long ago.

In the past couple of weeks, three deeply personal stories of loss, one involving a global sports figure, a beloved Nigerian writer and another an everyday Nigerian couple, have shaken the nation. They illustrate tragically that without a systemic shift towards accountability, no one is immune to Nigeria’s failures: not even the famous, the powerful and those we admire on the international stage.

Even the Strong Are Not Spared

On December 29, 2025, British Nigerian heavyweight boxing champion Anthony Joshua was involved in a fatal road accident on the Lagos–Ibadan Expressway, one of Nigeria’s busiest and most dangerous highways. The Lexus SUV in which he was travelling collided with a stationary truck; Joshua sustained injuries but survived, while two of his close team members: his strength coach Sina Ghami and personal trainer Latif “Latz” Ayodele, sadly, died instantly.

There are multiple layers in this accident that speak directly to Nigeria’s broken state. The Lagos–Ibadan Expressway is infamous for frequent crashes, partly due to heavy traffic, unregulated speed, poor maintenance, unregulated truck parking, reckless pedestrian crossing and inadequate signage to curb overspeeding, a recipe for disaster yet still unaddressed effectively by authorities.

Many Nigerians on social media pointed out that after the crash, there were no immediate ambulances or rapid medical emergency responses, only improvised actions by passersby and security personnel. This isn’t exceptional in Nigeria; it’s common.

Preliminary investigations cited excessive speed and vehicle control issues. Yet the deeper questions remain: Why are roadside hazards allowed? Why are emergency services not stationed where they are most needed? Why do highways without adequate patrol or rescue teams still serve millions?

The driver involved has been charged by Nigerian police with dangerous driving and other offences, a rare moment of accountability. But justice in individual cases does not equate to justice for all Nigerians killed or maimed daily on our roads.

For every high-profile accident that makes global news, dozens more go unreported: buses that plunge into ravines, trucks that crash into market stalls, pedestrians struck on unlit roads. These are not anomalies; they are everyday occurrences in a country whose infrastructure has been left to decay.

A Preventable Tragedy

As the nation was still digesting the shock of the Joshua accident, another blow struck. This time, closer to home for Nigeria’s intellectual and artistic community.

Renowned author Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie (aka Odeluwa) announced the death of her 21-month-old son, Nkanu Nnamdi, who passed away after a brief illness on January 7, 2026. While this is a deeply personal loss for any parent anywhere in the world, the tragedy has ignited widespread debate in Nigeria because of allegations of medical negligence at a private hospital in Lagos, one of the country’s centres of advanced care.

According to statements released by Adichie and her legal team, her child was taken to a hospital for diagnostic procedures, including sedation for an MRI scan and the insertion of a central line. What followed, the family alleges, was a series of preventable errors: excessive sedation with propofol, lack of proper monitoring, delayed emergency response, and ultimately cardiac arrest. They have since taken legal action, accusing the facility and its staff of breaching their duty of care.

The Lagos State Government has ordered an independent probe into the incident and even suspended the anaesthesiologist involved pending investigation. But the very fact that such basic and essential standards of care are now under scrutiny in a private hospital that should represent the best in the country tells us something profound about the state of our healthcare system.

Nigeria boasts some excellent clinicians, capable hospitals, and dedicated healthcare workers. Yet these strengths are undermined by: Weak regulatory oversight, where protocols are not universally enforced; inadequate training and accountability structures in facilities that operate without stringent quality controls; and a systemic failure to invest in patient safety culture, so that preventable deaths continue to occur.

This isn’t merely a “health sector problem.” It is a national crisis. When a world-class novelist with influence, privilege, and resources cannot protect her own child from medical negligence, how many ordinary Nigerians suffer quietly, without public notice?

Another Double Tragedy

Last week, Nigeria was rocked by another heartbreaking tragedy that laid bare the fragility of life under our overstretched health system: nine-month-old twin boys, Testimony and Timothy, died just 24 hours after receiving what should have been routine childhood immunisations at a government primary health care centre in Lagos.

Their father, Samuel Alozie, shared emotional footage online showing the lifeless bodies of his sons in separate body bags and recounted how the boys were healthy before the injections, only to become unusually weak soon after and then pass away the following morning, on Christmas Day.

The Lagos State Government has again ordered a post-mortem and toxicology tests to determine the cause of death, even as questions swirl around the circumstances of the immunisation and standard of care at the facility. The family’s grief has ignited public outrage and a growing demand for accountability, underscoring deep anxieties about vaccine safety, clinical protocols, and the responsibility of health workers in a country where preventable loss of young life has become all too common.

Stop Playing Russian Roulette with Nigerian Lives

These preventable tragedies are symbols of a pattern that has become horribly familiar. The young graduate who dies after a treatable illness because the local clinic lacked medication, the father who succumbs on a broken road because the ambulance never came, the mother who loses her child due to delays in emergency care and the commuter killed by potholes, poorly lit roads, and reckless trucks.

These are not isolated tragedies. They are systemic failures, repeated thousands of times, across regions and demographics. For many Nigerians, daily life is like playing Russian roulette; one emergency away from fatality.

At the core of these tragedies is a leadership that has consistently failed to prioritise the lives of its citizens. We have underfunded infrastructure, where roads crumble and highways remain death traps; weak healthcare systems, where even private hospitals can operate without strict oversight; poor emergency response services, with limited ambulances and chaotic disaster response and a political culture that focuses on spectacle rather than substance, optics rather than outcomes.

Instead of comprehensive road safety reforms, we see temporary enforcement crackdowns that fade into obscurity. Instead of investing in healthcare protocols and standards, we engage in reactive investigations after a tragedy while Nigeria is happening. These tragedies are not coincidences, they are the architecture of failure and a lack of accountability to citizens.

We must demand transparent investigations with consequences, not symbolic probes; invest in infrastructure that prevents deaths, not just slogans; reform healthcare delivery systems, with enforceable standards and patient protection laws; equip emergency services nationwide, so that rapid response is the norm, not the exception and hold leaders accountable, not only for their rhetoric, but for their results. Failure to do so will continue to cost lives, one Nigerian at a time.

May the souls of all those who have died rest in peace, and may God comfort their loved ones.

The views expressed by contributors are strictly personal and not of Law & Society Magazine.

Imo Father seeks justice after alleged killing of twin sons in oil revenue dispute

A grieving father in Imo State, southeastern Nigeria, is demanding justice after alleging that two of his twin sons and a nephew were murdered in separate attacks linked to a dispute over oil revenue, raising fresh concerns about violence, impunity and community conflicts in Nigeria’s oil-producing regions.

John Maduakolam, a native of Ukwugba Obiakpu Autonomous Community in Ohaji-Egbema Local Government Area, told journalists in Owerri that his twin sons, Izuchukwu and Ebube Maduakolam, and their cousin, Opara Abacha, were killed between February and September 2025 by a kinsman, Sixtus Chinenye Odinaka, and alleged accomplices.

Speaking at the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ) Press Centre in Owerri, Maduakolam said his family and other residents are living in fear, claiming that members of the suspect’s gang remain at large in nearby forests and continue to issue threats.

According to Maduakolam, the violence followed a bitter dispute over the discovery of oil wells in Ukwugba community, where his family allegedly owns a significant portion of the land.

He accused Odinaka of unilaterally appointing himself as a community representative and misappropriating funds paid by the oil company, without accountability.

“Because of his aggressive nature, no one dares confront him,” Maduakolam said. “He used that power to unleash terror on the entire community.”

Maduakolam alleged that after his family demanded transparency and a fair sharing formula, threats escalated.

“He kept telling people to warn me and my sons that we were standing in his way,” he said.

The first attack allegedly occurred in the early hours of February 7, 2025, when gunmen stormed Maduakolam’s home. One of the twins, Izuchukwu, was killed.

Maduakolam said the assailant later issued a direct threat against the surviving twin.

“He told me that if my second son did not play with caution, he would be killed too—and that he would use money to close the case,” he said.

The matter was reported to the police, who declared the suspect wanted and circulated his name and photograph, Maduakolam said.

Despite that, the family was struck again months later.

In the early hours of September 12, 2025, gunmen allegedly returned and killed the second twin, Ebube Jacob Maduakolam, beheading him before fleeing.

“They disappeared into hiding again,” Maduakolam said.

He added that Odinaka was later tracked to Cross River State, where he was allegedly attempting to flee to Cameroon, before being arrested and returned to Imo State.

Another victim, Chinweudo Opara, told reporters that her husband, Opara Abacha, was killed during the same September attack.

She said her husband had stepped outside their home when she heard gunshots.

“I ran out and saw him lying in a pool of blood,” she said.

Opara said she was then surrounded by masked men and beaten unconscious.

“The next thing I remember, I was in the hospital,” she said.

The families praised the Nigeria Police Force for arresting the suspect but urged authorities to track down remaining gang members, whom they said are still terrorising the community.

They also called for Odinaka to be arraigned before a court of competent jurisdiction, insisting that justice must be served for the deaths of their loved ones.

‘This Is Not Law Enforcement’: Ezekwesili writes Tinubu, Sanwo-Olu over Makoko demolition

Former Nigerian education minister and human rights advocate Dr Oby Ezekwesili has issued a blistering open letter to President Bola Tinubu and Lagos State Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu, accusing the government of abuse of power and disregard for the rule of law over the controversial demolition exercise in Makoko, one of Lagos’ most vulnerable waterfront communities.

In the strongly worded letter, Ezekwesili argues that authorities changed the rules mid-operation, expanded demolition boundaries without notice, and relied on vague administrative claims instead of clear legal authority, actions she says amount not to law enforcement but state-sanctioned lawlessness that threatens constitutional governance and human dignity.

The letter reads:

OPEN MEMORANDUM

TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA

AND THE GOVERNOR OF LAGOS STATE

Subject: The State-Sanctioned Oppression of the Poor in Makoko and the Assault on Constitutional Citizenship

To

President Bola Tinubu

President, Federal Republic of Nigeria

And

Mr Babajide Olusola Sanwo-Olu

Governor, Lagos State

This memorandum is written in defence of the Nigerian Constitution, the dignity of citizenship, and the humanity of some of the poorest Nigerians- the poor residents of Makoko, Lagos.

Mr. President, Mr. Governor,

1. Do the poor have a right to the city, or only the rich?

2. Is Lagos a commonwealth of citizens, or a marketplace where land value overrides human value?

3. Does Nigeria’s democracy protect only those with means, or all citizens?

History will most definitely judge your answers not by the speeches you make, but by the actions you take following from here.

Makoko residents are not squatters on the Nigerian soil. They are citizens of Nigeria. They are preyed on by your same political class to vote for your parties during elections. They work. They raise families. Their children whose education is now disrupted are some of the most brilliant Nigerians I have met. They contribute to the Lagos economy through fishing, trade, and informal enterprise.

Read Also: Makoko After the Bulldozers: Families sleep in canoes as Lagos moves to prosecute community leader

Read Also: Hello BBC, Mary John is not Makoko’s first graduate

Yet, for decades, the residents of Makoko have been treated as though poverty nullifies their citizenship.

This memorandum is written for the children of Makoko who now sleep in the open, for their mothers clutching what remains of their households, and for a nation that must decide whether poverty- which by the way is mostly the result of bad governance- is a crime, and whether justice still means anything in our country.

This memorandum is written because a deeply troubling picture has emerged from the morbid silence that follows the heartless demolition of homes far beyond 100 meters of the power line in Makoko. All reasonable people can easily see the injustice to the victims of the demolitions and condemn this dubious State-sanctioned eviction unequivocally.

This memorandum is written to demand an immediate halt of the systematic oppression of the poor being done to the people of Makoko by the Lagos State Government, with the silence and acquiescence of the Federal Government. Seizure of Makoko from the residents is unjust, unconstitutional, and morally indefensible.

What has happened in Makoko is not about safety nor urban development. What is happening in Makoko is that individuals in authority of the Nigerian State are engaged in a vicious Class Cleansing- to banish the poor from the sight of the powerful and their rich friends.

It is widely reported that in earlier meetings with Makoko’s traditional chiefs and community leaders, officials of the Lagos State Government informed them that the demolition exercise was strictly limited to structures located within a 30–50 metre safety corridor from high-tension power lines crossing the lagoon. This was presented as a narrowly defined public-safety intervention, consistent with planning regulations around critical infrastructure.

Community leaders cooperated in good faith with this representation. However, what has unfolded since then constitutes a fundamental breach of trust and legality. Despite the acceptable distance stipulated by law falling within the 30–50 metre range, the demolition has continued far beyond those limits, reportedly surpassing the agreed metre mark and extending deep into the residential core of Makoko, engulfing homes, schools, clinics, and livelihoods that bear no reasonable connection to the original safety justification.

A human rights monitoring source cited a range of 277–522 metres from the power lines as part of the cleared area  which is far past what was initially communicated.

A government that changes the rules mid-exercise, widens demolition boundaries without notice, and substitutes vague administrative assertions for clear legal authority is not enforcing the law- it has flagrantly abused power.

The incontrovertible conclusion to be drawn, is that Nigerians and the rest of the world have just witnessed a King Ahab-level land grab from the poorest of the poor by a pillaging political class that has captured the Nigeria-State. Like poor Naboth in the Bible who was killed by the wicked King Ahab to forcefully grab his land, at least four Nigerians- some of whom called Makoko their home for decades- were reportedly killed in this grand land heist by the Nigeria-State.

With the massive destruction of homes in one of Nigeria’s largest slums, the Nigerian State has shamelessly gone rogue by stealthily using administrative convenience to dispossess the poor of their meagre land assets.

Pretending to care about safety, the Lagos State Government has with the evident complicity of the Federal authorities in Abuja rendered thousands of Nigerians homeless by bulldozers deployed in the name of development, safety, and urban order and all done without compassion, restraint, or lawful care for human life.

Our Governments went from a safety claim to forced eviction of our citizens from their lands. What is occurring in Makoko is not merely a technical planning dispute over metres. What is happening in Makoko is an undisputed constitutional failure of process, transparency, and restraint. Period.

Until the latest safety reasons, the repeated justification of demolitions in Makoko was under the banner of “urban renewal” or “megacity aspirations” and that in itself reveals a deeply troubling governance mindset. It is the classist mindset that thinks of development as something done to the poor, not with them and that the city is for the wealthy, while the poor are disposable.

A State that cannot build with its poorest citizens but can only bulldoze over them has failed the most basic test of leadership.

Global best practice rejects forced evictions. I should know. As then Vice President of the World Bank responsible for forty eight countries in the Africa Region, it was imperative for any of the countries which borrowed money for urban infrastructure projects to present comprehensive environmental and social commitment plans that are consistent with global best practices on how they would treat people in cases like Makoko.

What will make Lagos a respected mega-city is to strategically build up to the status of an inclusive city. Inclusive cities invest in in-situ upgrading, secure tenure, sanitation, schools, and livelihoods. Makoko’s residents and civil society groups have proposed these solutions repeatedly but have persistently been ignored by governments.

Painfully, the poor of Makoko have been made to pay, overnight, the price of a city’s ambition. With this latest demolition, there is a question that cannot be ignored- What does citizenship really mean if the State can destroy your home and leave you with nothing?

Most alarming is the State-created homelessness and the acute humanitarian emergency now confronting Makoko residents. Thousands of families of men, women, children, the elderly, and persons with disabilities have been rendered instantly homeless by these demolitions. Security forces are deployed against civilians whose only crime is being poor and visible on valuable waterfront land. Many are sleeping in the open, exposed to rain, heat, disease, violence, and hunger. Children have been pulled out of school. Livelihoods have been destroyed overnight.

The conditions of the evicted residents of Makoko is both a Constitutional and Moral Matter. This level of displacement triggers an immediate duty of care by the state. Therefore, continued silence or delay by the Federal Government to protect and care for our beleaguered citizens in the face of this crisis amounts to complicity in their suffering.

A government cannot create homelessness and then plead administrative delay. A state that leaves citizens homeless after state action has violated everything that the Nigerian Constitution guarantees- the dignity of the human person, the right to a fair hearing, and the obligation of the state to promote social justice and welfare-regardless of how it labels the exercise. The pattern of arbitrary demolitions and displacement in Makoko violates both the letter and spirit of these guarantees.

Even where governments lawfully acquire land or enforce planning regulations, international standards and basic decency require the immediate provision of temporary shelter, emergency accommodation, sanitation, food access, and protection for displaced persons. To demolish homes without simultaneously providing short-term shelter is not only callous-it is inhumane and unlawful.

I have a few demands as a citizen of Nigeria. I demand the following immediate and non-negotiable actions to correct the injustices and wrongs committed against the residents of Makoko:

1. An immediate halt to all demolitions and evictions in Makoko.

2. Public disclosure and legal clarification of the exact planning standards governing power-line setbacks, including the authority under which demolition exceeded 50 metres.

3. Immediate provision of short-term emergency shelter for all displaced Makoko families, including, temporary housing or safe accommodation, access to water, sanitation, and healthcare, protection for children, women, and vulnerable persons.

4. Compensation and livelihood support for those already displaced.

5. A transparent, participatory process for long-term solutions developed with the community, prioritizing Security of tenure, access to basic services, and protection of livelihoods through in-situ urban upgrading rather than mass displacement.

6. Public accountability for past abuses, including the use of force against civilians and by officials who authorized demolition beyond lawful limits.

I wish to sound a considered warning to our politicians in and outside of government. A nation that fails to govern well and turns around to criminalize poverty while celebrating wealth has lost completely its moral compass and teetering on the edge.

The Nigeria-State can never successfully hide away her poor by seizing their land and killing them.

Our distressed country of over 133 million multidimensionally poor people (more than 60% of our population) according to the Nigeria Bureau of Statistics, cannot be respected because we built a city that chases global prestige by crushing its poorest residents to achieve so-called “world-class” status.

With such overwhelming poverty numbers, how many poor Nigerians can your Governments, Mr President and Mr Governor evict, kill or hide away from sight?

I advice that you both think deeply about this and choose to do right by your majority poor citizens.

Start immediately with the grieving children of Makoko and their families.

It is fiercely urgent.

Obiageli “Oby” Ezekwesili is the Founder of School of Politics, Policy and Governance (SPPG).

1...110111112...1,426Page 111 of 1,426

TIPS

Load more