Home Blog Page 101

Top 10 political events that shaped Nigeria in 2024

0

By Israel Arogbonlo

As the year 2024 comes to a close, Nigeria has witnessed a plethora of significant political events that have shaped the country’s landscape. From policy changes to diplomatic face-offs, these events have had a profound impact on the nation.

In this report, Tribune Online highlights the top 10 political events that made headlines in 2024.

1. Adoption of New National Anthem

In a bid to promote national unity and identity, the Nigerian government reinstated the country’s original national anthem, “Nigeria, We Hail Thee,” which was in use from 1960 to 1978.

2. Increase in National Minimum Wage

The government raised the national minimum wage from ₦30,000 to ₦70,000 in response to rising living costs. This decision came after prolonged negotiations between labor unions and government officials.

3. Collapse of National Grid

The collapse of the national grid underscored the persistent challenges facing Nigeria’s power sector, disrupting daily life for millions of Nigerians.

4. End Bad Governance Protests

Nationwide protests erupted amidst a cost-of-living crisis and rising costs, which Nigerians blamed on President Bola Tinubu’s new reforms. At least 11 people were killed, and one journalist was arrested.

5. Cabinet Reshuffle

President Tinubu implemented a cabinet reshuffle, dismissing the ministers of education, tourism, women’s affairs, and youth development, as well as the junior minister for housing.

6. US Presidential Elections

The 2024 US presidential elections drew significant interest from Nigerians, particularly due to the potential impact of the candidates’ policies on Nigeria.

7. Ibadan Explosion

An explosion in Ibadan, Oyo State, highlighted issues of urban safety and regulation, resulting in loss of lives and injuries.

8. Kuriga Kidnapping

Over 200 pupils and a teacher were kidnapped in the town of Kuriga, Kaduna, but later freed.

9. Ibadan, Anambra, Abuja Stampede

The stampedes, which occurred in different parts of the country, resulted in loss of lives and injuries, highlighting the need for improved crowd control measures and emergency response systems.

10. Badenoch, Shettima Face-off

The public disagreement between UK Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch and Nigeria’s Vice President Kashim Shettima tested Nigeria’s diplomatic mettle and its relations with key international partners.

Culled from Tribune online.

Lagos State tells Supreme Court to reverse rape acquittal of Dr. Femi Olaleye

Following the acquittal of Lagos-based Dr Femi Olaleye by the Lagos division of the Court of Appeal, the State Government has requested the Supreme Court to overturn the intermediate court’s decision which cleared the medical doctor/ Managing Director of Optimal Cancer Care Foundation of defilement charges. Olaleye was said to have sexually abused his wife’s niece.

In its Notice of Appeal filed by the state Director of Public Prosecution (DPP), Dr. Babajide Martins, the state urged the apex court to allow the appeal and uphold the conviction and sentencing imposed by the trial court.

Olaleye was convicted in October 2023 by the Lagos Special Offences and Domestic Violence Court on two charges bordering on child defilement and sexual assault by penetration.

These charges were filed against him by the Lagos Ministry of Justice in November 2022.
However, in November 2024, the Court of Appeal acquitted Olaleye, citing errors in the lower court’s judgement.

The appellate court, in a judgement delivered by Justice Jimi Olukayode Bada, found that the trial court had interfered with proceedings in a way that compromised the integrity of the prosecution’s case.

It ruled that the evidence presented by the prosecution was “tainted” and “unreliable,” leading to the reversal of the doctor’s conviction.

Following the decision, Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) urged the Lagos State government to appeal the acquittal.

Read Also: Lagos doctor, Femi Olaleye, freed weeks after Appeal Court nullified his rape conviction

They petitioned the Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Lawal Pedro (SAN), calling for the case to be taken to the Supreme Court to restore public confidence in the justice system.

On December 27, 2024, the Lagos State government filed an appeal at the Supreme Court, seeking to reverse the Court of Appeal’s acquittal of Olaleye.

The state’s grounds for appeal included the claim that the appellate court erred in disregarding Section 209(2) of the Evidence Act, 2011, and the Supreme Court decision in Dagaya v. State (2006).

The state argued that the sworn evidence of a child over the age of 14 required corroboration, as stipulated by Section 209(3) of the Evidence Act, 2011, which mandates corroboration for the testimony of children under 14 in defilement cases.

In addition, the state sought the following reliefs, “An order allowing the appeal and setting aside the judgment of the Court of Appeal delivered on November 29, 2024.

“An order affirming the conviction and sentences imposed on Olaleye by the trial court in Charge No. ID/20289C/2022.”

How Court threw out divorce petition of couple who were having sex during period of alleged irreconcilable differences

0

By Ogbu, Blessing Ekpere, Esq.

I have always marvelled at the sheer uncanniness of couples fighting and inflicting grievous injuries on each other and tearing each other emotionally with mean and deeply incisive vitriols and still find, somehow and miraculously, the sexual urge, passion and attraction to make love to each other that same day, or a day or a couple of days after. 😀 😀

I have always wondered if I was the only person who believes such inconsistency can be described, well, charitably, as a quirky eccentricity, or, harshly, as a physiological aberration.

Well, it seems the High Court of Plateau State and the Court of Appeal also noticed and took note of the oddity in one particular case that was decided in 1992. In the case of Anagbado v. Anagbado (1992) 1 NWLR (Pt. 216) 207, the Petitioner and the Respondent had six children in a space of twelve years.

In January 1986, the Petitioner, Justine Emenike Anagbado (the husband), filed this Petition for the dissolution of the marriage between him and the Respondent, Esther Ifebube Anagbado (the wife) on the ground that the marriage had broken down irretrievably. The facts upon which he urged the Court to find that the marriage had broken down irretrievably were that the wife was cruel to him and had behaved in a manner that he could not reasonably be expected to live with her.

Some of the instances of the alleged cruelty alleged were: The wife was always making fun of him in the presence of the children; the wife was mocking his deformity by placing obstacles on his way, knowing that he had bad eyesight; the wife was adulterous; the wife was fetish.

In her defence, the wife averred that she loved the man so much that they had six children between 1974, when they got married, and 1986 when the husband presented the petition for dissolution of the marriage. She also claimed that the man was being instigated by his family members to divorce her, not that he, on his own, wanted to divorce her.

The trial court found for the Respondent and dismissed the petition on the grounds that the Petitioner could not prove cruelty and adultery. The Petitioner also included grounds not recognised under section 15(1) of the Matrimonial Causes Act, thereby rendering the petition itself incompetent in limine.

The man was not happy with the judgment of the trial court and therefore appealed to the Court of Appeal (Jos Division). The Learned Justices of the Court of Appeal (Aloma Mariam Mukhtar, J.C.A. (as he then was, later, JSC and, later, CJN), Yekini Olayiwola Adio, J.C.A. (as he then was, later, JSC) and Obinnaya Anunobi Okezie, J.C.A. reviewed the records of appeal and unanimously dismissed the appeal – not because the Petitioner agglutinated competent grounds with incompetent grounds – but, rather, because he could not prove cruelty and adultery.

Now, this is the part I find simultaneously hilarious and instructive. At pages 218-219, paras. H-D of the Law Report, Adio, JCA (as he then was, later, JSC) who delivered the leading judgment, wondered inter alia thus:-

“Prima facie, one might be tempted to ask what the fact that a couple had six children within a period of twelve years or the fact that they were having sexual intercourse regularly within the same period had to do with the question whether one of them had been cruel to the other. The provision of section 12(a) of the Evidence Act is that facts not otherwise relevant are relevant if they are inconsistent with any fact in issue or relevant fact and under section 12(b) of the Act, facts not otherwise relevant are relevant if by themselves or in connection with other facts they make the existence or non-existence of any fact in issue or relevant fact probable or improbable.

“The fact of the respondent having a child for the appellant practically every other year for a period of twelve years and of the fact that even on the 6th October, 1985, the appellant had sexual intercourse with the respondent, particularly when virtually all the allegations concerning cruelty made against the respondent related to incidents which took place before October, 1985, were inconsistent with the averment that the respondent for the most part of the marriage had behaved in such a way that the petitioner could not reasonably be expected to live with the respondent or that the marriage had irretrievably broken down.

“If the situation was so bad in the matrimonial home that the appellant could not reasonably be expected to live with the respondent, the appellant could not have been putting the respondent in family way every other year for a period of twelve years. The learned trial judge was therefore right in coming to the conclusion that the appellant failed to prove cruelty. The answer to the question raised in the second issue is in the affirmative.”

😂😂

Abeg, make I run go take my bottle of Hero.

©Ogbu, Blessing Ekpere, Esq.
28/12/2024

Pastor Adeboye, owners of Nigeria and 2025

0

By Lasisi Olagunju

If the elites of the North will not ‘give’ President Bola Tinubu a second term, who told them that the South will give power back to them in 2027? Leper losing his needle presents peculiar problems. It is not two years since power changed hands in Nigeria but the jungle is already rumbling. Mordant cries about French bases, about federal appointments lacking symmetry, about dirty gutters and stinking swamps are all familiar tricks of snatching the forest from the current champion. The roars of ‘fairness’ are not about ‘justice’ and the people and the challenges they face. They are not about terror and error bombs; not about cheap deaths, hunger and joblessness. The goal is power with all the privileges it gives the privileged.

But we are what Cecil Helman’s ‘Parables’ says we are: fragments under the feet of fate. Nobody, and nobody, neither North nor South, owns this land. The one who created power possesses it – and that is the Creator. But, some think Nigeria and all of us can be knitted into anything that suits their fingers –all because of greed of unearned grandeur. They should look keenly at coconut: it rests on its side despite having a bottom. Why? Those who think power is their own exclusive possession and think life cannot be lived well outside power should listen to the following parables and the story that follow them:

Long, long ago, at the beginning of time in Ile Ife, there was a very poor man who had only one he-goat as his only means of living. He-goat is called itú in Yoruba. This poor man got his daily meal through the she-goats his itú mated with. One day, he discovered to his sorrow that the goat was missing. It was stolen.

The man searched and searched for his goat without success. The more he searched, the sadder he became because he suspected that his pricey goat may have become food in some thieving tummies. He kept searching. Then, one day, he met an old man who asked what his problem was. He told him.

The old man gave the poor man a warning that he must stop the search. Itú (he – goat) rẹ̀ sọnù, ṣùgbọ́n wọ́n kìí nílọ̀ pé kò gbọ́dọ̀ wá a. “So what do I do? I will die of hunger without that goat!” The distraught told the old man who simply gave him a metal gong – agogo ọ̀ràn – (gong of trouble) is what the old man called it.

The poor man was told to beat that gong in front of the houses of all principal kings of Yorubaland. The man set out. He went to ilé Alárá, he went to Ajerò; he was at the palace of Òràngún; he was at the Ààfin in Oyo. He went to all the 16 principal kings, the Ọlọ́jà mẹ́rẹ̀ẹ̀rindínlógún. But they all prevented him from beating the gong in front of their houses. They pleaded with him to go away with his Agogo ọ̀ràn. They offered him money, much money, and more money. The man became rich, very rich like any of the principal men of power. His status changed. He is not king but he was big enough to dine with kings. He thanked his Eleda (his Maker) for sending a worthy angel to him in the image of the old man. He also thanked his orí (his inner self) for not making him a man who would ignore the wisdom of elders.

Now, the men of power could ignore the poor man or get him arrested. They could even kill him for his audacity. If they killed him, who would query them? But they understood the man to be a victim of state failure; they clothed him with remedial gestures.

The poor man too could ignore the old man and his counsel and remain searching for what is lost – forever. God closed his goaty door of poverty, he did not insist on opening it. Nobody owns anything; not goat; not power. The one who does not say the elder parades a smelly mouth is the one who conquers life and its difficulties. The next parable tells more of power and its powerlessness.

Pastor Enoch Adejare Adeboye is a very deep, wise man. Recently, he gave the Soun of Ogbomoso an invaluable gift in folktale wrappers. The audio is online, viral. I did the transcription:

Several years ago. There was an incident in a town called Ejigbo. It was noticed that the kings there died as soon as they ascended the throne. Then, it was the turn of a young man to be king.

His case was a very precarious one. If he became king, he would die. If he refused to be king, it would be the end of his royal lineage in that town because he was the very last prince there alive.

One day, the young prince was going to the farm in great sorrow. Then, he bumped into an old man because he was troubled. He begged the old man for forgiveness.

“Omo aládé, kí ló dé? (Prince, what is the problem?” The old man asked him.

He told the old man his problem.

“It is my turn to be king, but I don’t want to die.”

The old man listened to him; then told him it was a simple thing. On the day of your enthronement, tell your drummers not to repeat the beat they beat for your predecessors. They should change it. The old man told the prince what his beat should say. Between them, it was a secret.

The D-Day came. He became king. It was time for celebrations. The king came out to dance round the town. The witches of the town, devourers of the earlier kings, assembled as usual under their tree, waiting for the drumbeat.

The old beat was:

Eléjìgbò l’ó l’Èjìgbò;

Èmi nÌkan ni mo l’Èjìgbò.

(Eléjìgbò, the king, owns Ejigbo

I alone own Èjìgbò).

But by the time the drummers of the new king started beating the drum for him, they came with a new beat:

Eléjìgbò l’ó l’Èjìgbò;

T’èmi tì’e l’a l’Èjìgbò.

Eléjìgbò l’ó l’Èjìgbò;

Gbogbo wa l’a l’Èjìgbò.

(Eléjìgbò owns Èjìgbò;

You and I own Èjìgbò.

Eléjìgbò owns Èjìgbò;

We all own Èjìgbò).

The witches exchanged glances. “This is strange! Who gave this young man this wisdom?” That was how the young king danced round the town. He was king and he was on the throne for a very long time. Q.E.D.

Great words of counsel are like rains; when they are released; they fall on more than one roof. Those nuggets from Pastor Adeboye should benefit more than the oba to whom they were directed. I take them as a sermon for all who think or take themselves to be owners of Nigeria. The words are for regions and religions; kings, principalities and presidents, and all conceited people who think the throne is for their whims to give and withdraw. I hope they know that half words are enough said to the well-bred.

Two days to the new year, I have one more word from our elders. It is a story of power and its implications.

The sermon is from Hubert Ogunde’s 1945 play ‘Strike and Hunger’, a drama about resistance, justice and moderation in leadership. Truth, in whatever form it is couched, is bitter. Nigeria happened to Ogunde for daring to write and stage that play. He told the story several times, and each time you heard or read him, you knew that the rain of Nigeria did not start beating fairness yesterday – it started a long time ago. Ogunde recalled that experience: “After the general strike of 1945, I staged a play ‘Strike and Hunger’ which became a hit with the indigenous population while the colonial masters thought the play was inciting the people to riot. When I took the play to the Northern Region in 1946, I was arrested and prosecuted in Jos. The £200 fine imposed on me was paid by the Yoruba community in Jos, but my troupe was banned from performing in the North.” That story told by Ogunde to a news magazine in 1973 was reproduced by Bernth Lindfors, then of the University of Texas, Austin, in his ‘Ogunde on Ogunde’, published in May 1976.

Between 1944 and 1989, Hubert Ogunde wrote and staged 56 plays. I counted them and clicked those with links on ogunde museum.org. ‘Strike and Hunger’ is number nine on the list there. I transcribed and translated the lyrics and present a summary of the plot here:

‘Strike and Hunger’ starts with the king of this town, Oba Yejide, in full bloom. He receives his people’s acclamation: “Elephant who owns the forest; Buffalo that owns the savannah.” He is Oba Yejide, the king whose possessions are the sea and its rising and falling tides.

The king replies his people’s love with lines of arrogance: “I, Yejide, great king. I snatch others’ houses and make them mine; I take others’ homes and become fat by them.” Despite all these, the king still does good; he commands respect and loyalty in all circles of the town. His people need jobs, he gives them government work to do. They sing, they dance and “rejoice in their one kobo per day job.”

Then change happens to them and the town. Inflation hits the roof; their kobo per day loses its vaiue. The people approach the Oba for help. Oba Yejide’s response to the food inflation is to establish a food market in the palace. The people are happy again. They think the market will offer goods for buyers, food for the hungry. They declare that their king owns the world; they say everyone must obey him; they sing his praise. They warn dog not to dare their leopard so that it will not wear gowns of blood.

Things soon get bad again. Hunger seizes the land. The king’s food market gets a new name. Thoroughly disappointed townspeople call it “Ojà ebi” (hunger market). The people work harder but their salaries remain the same while prices at the hunger market keep rising daily. Buyers who complain of the daily rise in the price of food items receive lashes, some get wounded. Complaint is disloyalty. Anyone who says the king is failing is made to eat his pounded yam as yam. The people turn their hunger into bursts of oxymoron: “hunger is satiation/ the world is changing.”

Workers are downcast; Oba Yejide’s minimum wage is maximum cage. The people are trapped in his fiefdom and they complain. They are hungry; they shout the needs you shout today. Ogunde says the people sing in sorrow: “Ebi ńpa wá o, ará mi (We are hungry, my people).” Workers down tools. They continue their song of depression: “Kí l’a ó fi kóbò ojúmó se (what shall we do with a daily wage of one kobo?)”

The king ignores them; he says the people should go and manage. The people are sad and angry; they won’t stop singing songs of defiance and lamentation, and subversion: “Workers do not have money to feed/ We have no cloth, we have no dress/ we move about stark naked like monkeys/ Yet, Oba Yejide feeds well; Yejide drinks/ He forgets the day of reckoning…(Àwa òsìsé kò r’ówó jeun/Béè l’aò l’áso, béè l’aò l’éwù/ Ìhòhò l’awá ńrìn bí òbo/Oba Yéjídé ńje; Yéjídé ńmu/ Kò rántí p’ójó èsan ńbò…). .”

They sing frustration and helplessness. They say “a worker who wakes up into hunger and wears rags lives a hollow life/ The dead are better than such a person (lásánlásán l’óńbe l’áyé/ eni t’ókú sàn jùú lo).” Oba Yejide’s reign suffers strikes and protests. He is called “Oba elébi” (king of hunger). But he does not care.

The song on the street is:

The king’s men eat and drink to satiation,

The king’s chiefs eat and are happy,

They are happy and they dance.

Workers are dying the death of hunger,

Husband and wife feed on miserable grains.

God, Almighty,

Please come and deliver us from those who hate us but commiserate with us…

(Asojú oba ńje, wón ńje,

Wón ńje, wón mu;

Ìjòyè oba ńyó wón ńyò,

Wón ńyò sèsè;

Àwon òsìsé ńkú ikú ebi,

T’okot’aya ńje jéró;

Èdùmàrè yé o, ó d’owó Re,

A-wí-má-ye-hùn,

K’ó gbà wá l’ówó àwon

Abínú eni tí ńbá ni dárò…).

Still, the oba won’t lift their burden. He won’t bend and the people won’t stoop. Face-off is what the white man calls it. The town doubles down and sings to Oba Yejide who thinks the world is his property:

Oba tó s’abúlé di’gbó,

Oba tó s’abúlé d’ilè,

Aráíyé kò ní gbàgbé rè

Oba elébi…

(The Oba who turns the village to bush,

The king who turns the village to rubble,

The world will not forget you,

King of hunger…).

That is my 2024 review of Ogunde’s ‘Strike and Hunger’. It ends with the oba eventually dropping his arrogance and making amends. The palace moves the minimum wage from one kobo to ten shillings per day; the king orders the hunger market closed. Old markets reopen. There is enough for every buyer to buy; enough for all mouths to feed. Everyone is happy, the town becomes peaceful once again and the song transits to that of praise and freedom.

Those are my stories. The lesson from all the elders is that the world is the sea and the people in it the lagoon; no master swimmer swims them successfully. Let all powers and power blocs do good and take things easy. Nigeria is not a possession of any region or religion; president or potentate. It belongs not to the angry elites of the North plotting day and night against Tinubu and the South; and it is certainly not the property of Tinubu, today’s viceroy.

We pray for peace and joy and victory in 2025. May God say amen to our positive prayers.

Surrogacy Law and Development in Nigeria

0

By Dr Olukayode Ajulo, SAN

Exploring the Need for Comprehensive Legislation

Surrogacy has emerged as a significant reproductive option globally, yet it remains largely unregulated in Nigeria. This article examines the current legal framework surrounding surrogacy in Nigeria, contrasting it with other jurisdictions, and highlights the pressing need for a comprehensive legal structure to protect the rights of all parties involved.

Understanding Surrogacy in Nigeria

Surrogacy is a complex issue that intersects family law, reproductive rights, and ethical considerations. In Nigeria, the lack of specific laws governing surrogacy creates a legal void, resulting in challenges for intended parents, surrogates, and medical practitioners. This article aims to shed light on the existing state of surrogacy law in Nigeria, identify its shortcomings, and propose recommendations for its development.

Current Legal Framework

1. Constitutional and Statutory Context
The Nigerian Constitution does not explicitly address surrogacy, leading to ambiguity in its legal recognition. The Nigerian Child Rights Act (2003) emphasizes children’s rights but lacks provisions for surrogacy arrangements. While some states have laws related to assisted reproductive technology (ART), no specific regulations for surrogacy practices exist.

2. Judicial Precedents
There is a scarcity of case law regarding surrogacy in Nigeria. Courts often rely on general family law principles, which can result in inconsistent rulings and uncertainty regarding legal parentage.

Comparative Analysis with Other Countries

1. International Perspectives
Countries like South Africa have established comprehensive legal frameworks governing surrogacy, providing clear guidelines and protections for all parties involved. South Africa’s Surrogacy Act (2002) allows both altruistic and commercial surrogacy under regulated conditions. In stark contrast, many African nations, including Nigeria, lack such comprehensive laws, raising concerns about potential exploitation and abuse in surrogacy arrangements.

2. Cultural and Ethical Considerations
In Nigeria, cultural and religious beliefs significantly influence perceptions of surrogacy. Many view it as morally questionable, complicating the legal discourse surrounding the practice.

Challenges in the Current Legal Landscape

1. Lack of Regulation
The absence of a clear legal framework creates uncertainty for intended parents and surrogates, leading to potential exploitation and abuse.

2. Ethical Concerns
The exploitation of low-income women acting as surrogates is a significant issue. The lack of regulation raises ethical questions about consent and the commercialization of reproduction.

3. Legal Parentage Issues
Determining legal parentage in surrogacy arrangements can be complex, especially when the arrangement is not recognized by law.

Recent Developments

1. Growing Awareness
Public discourse around assisted reproductive technologies, including surrogacy, is increasing, particularly in urban areas of Nigeria.

2. Proposed Legislative Framework
Legal scholars and practitioners are advocating for comprehensive legislation to regulate surrogacy and protect the rights of all parties involved. This includes proposals for ethical guidelines and legal recognition of surrogacy agreements.

3. International Influence
The practices and laws of countries with established surrogacy frameworks may inspire Nigerian lawmakers to develop regulations in the future.

Conclusion

The legal landscape of surrogacy in Nigeria is characterized by a lack of clear regulations and significant cultural challenges. As awareness of reproductive rights grows, there is an urgent need for comprehensive legislation to safeguard the rights of intended parents, surrogates, and children born through surrogacy. Legal reforms should aim to create a balanced framework that addresses ethical concerns while facilitating access to surrogacy as a viable reproductive option.

Recommendations

– Legislative Action: The Nigerian government should prioritize the creation of a comprehensive legal framework for surrogacy that outlines the rights and responsibilities of all parties involved.
– Public Awareness Campaigns: Initiatives to educate the public about surrogacy and its legal implications can help reduce stigma and promote informed decision-making.
– Ethical Guidelines: Establishing ethical guidelines for surrogacy practices can protect vulnerable populations and ensure fair treatment of surrogates.

Lawyer challenges parental tax clearance requirement for student registration, gives pre-action notice to Kogi State Government

A Kogi-based legal practitioner and Rights activist, A. Odoma, has issued A Pre-Action Notice Against Kogi State’s Policy on Parental Tax Clearance for Student Registration: A Fight for Educational Justice

In a recent controversial policy, the Kogi State government threatened to shun fundamental rights for burdensome rules. A memo dated November 26, 2024, issued by the Chairman of the Kogi State Board of Internal Revenue Service, mandates that institutions of learning in the state refuse to register students who fail to present a verifiable tax clearance certificate from their parents. This policy has sparked outrage among citizens, with Human Rights Lawyer A. Odoma, Esq., stepping forward to challenge its legality.

In a pre-action notice addressed to His Excellency, the Executive Governor of Kogi State, Alhaji Usman Ododo, and the Executive Chairman of the Kogi State Board of Internal Revenue Service, A. Odoma laid bare the policy’s flaws, branding it “repugnant to natural justice, equity, and good conscience.”

PRE-ACTION NOTICE TO THE EXECUTIVE GOVERNOR OF KOGI STATE AND THE EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN OF KOGI STATE BOARD OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE ON THE PARENTS TAX CLEARANCE CERTIFICATE PRESENTATION AS A PREREQUISITE FOR REGISTRATION IN KOGI STATE INSTITUTIONS OF LEARNING.

I read a memo from the office of the Chairman Kogi State Board of Internal Revenue Service dated on the 26th November, 2024 mandating institutions of learning not to register any student without a verifiable parent’s tax clearance certificate. This policy is not only repugnant to Natural Justice, Equity and good conscience but also an attempt to deprive the future leaders their right to education. The Chairman of the board should take note that education is not a privilege but a right, it then goes to say that education is legally guaranteed for all without discrimination. All states including Kogi State has the duty to protect, respect and fulfill the right of education of her citizens without discrimination.

This policy is purely incongruous to the people’s right to education and we will hold the State accountable for violation and deprivation of our people’s right to education. How does it concern an innocent child/Student whose duty is not to enforce tax payment to suffer from non compliance of his parent to pay tax to Kogi State Government. We should also take note that we were once children of no body before we became somebody. Our quest to satisfy the financial urge of the government should not deprive the citizens of their fundamental rights especially that of education which is not freely given. I have seen some students without parents or guardians struggling to sponsor themselves with hard labour. Some of our Governors and Senators in Nigeria didn’t grow with parental support but via being determined and focused to achieve education.

I know the current Governor of Kogi State, the person of Alaji Usman Ododo, his style of leadership to the best of my knowledge is not in conformity with this obnoxious policy made in violation of people’s right to education and I am of a strong view that the said policy be reversed for the following reasons:

1. It is a violation of people’s right to education.

2. It affects the I.G.R. of the institutions of learning owing to deprivation of the right to register both as fresh or returning students.

His Excellency’s Government has not and should not be seen as Government that will pose untold hardship on the people. I have identified his government to be people’s friendly government and as such should though the path of honour by reversing the said policy before the 10th day of January 2025 or I shall humbly take the option of litigation against the government in protection of the people’s right to education.

Dated 27th day of December, 2024.

A. Odoma Esq.

(Human Rights Lawyer)

Intimate Affairs: Pull your son’s ears now

0

By Funke Egbemode

I know abusive men like it when we tell their battered wives things like these:

“He will change, just keep on praying.”

“If prayer fails, start to praise God. He will notice your pain and come through for you.”

“With God, all things are possible.”

“God is able to do all things, including changing your husband. You’ll see.”

“God is the owner of the hearts of kings. He will touch his heart and you never know, he could become a big pastor eventually.”

“Marriage is all about patience. He’ll come around.”

“If you leave him, who will take care of the children like you?”

“You want to leave your children, to be raised by a step-mother?”

“Noooo, you can’t leave. What will people say?”

“How will you face the church, the society…..?”

“Life of a single-woman is hard.”

“Marriage is forever. Everybody is carrying their cross. Your friends also have their problems.”

You know what, all those lines are true and cute. Marriage is a long-distance trip, a marathon, a long-haul, usually with no layovers. You need all the energy in you, physical, spiritual and emotional to carry on even in a good one. But a marriage spiced with slaps and blows, bruised lips and black eyes? I don’t know what that needs. I don’t know if patience can cook a stone like our parents told us. I just know that it’s only a living wife that can feel the balm of Gilead on her wounds.

A certain public figure reportedly told his daughter to slap her husband right back if he dares to slap her. You can take that anyway you want. You are even free to tell your daughter to turn the other cheek if her husband slaps her. That’s your opinion and you are totally entitled to it. Some of us have more violent responses to men slapping our daughters but I will not impose my ‘vawulence’ on you. I firmly believe that if a man slaps a woman for the first time and she responds in kind, it will make him think twice the next time he raises his hands.

Just think about it, picture it. Be honest. Do you think a man who remembers the stinging pain of his wife’s palm on his face will rush to repeat the experience?

There was this young wife who had been battered repeatedly by her husband. She decided to do something about it or shall we say she decided to give him a memorable treat.

‘For two years, I bore his fist. He treated me like I had no sense, no feelings. Yes, he picked all the bills but I treated him like a king too. I love him, even now, but his anger issues, God-complex and controlling nature has to be experienced to be believed. He got angry because I told him I wanted to resume my business when our son was nine months old. He beat me for taking a PhD form. He beat me for going to the movies with my friends. Really, I don’t know how other women are able to live with physical abuse for years. Me, two years was my limit.’ Bisi told me.

So what did she do? She paid some muscle men to beat her husband up. Shocked? Harry, Bisi’s husband was more shocked.

Harry’s first shocking realization was how unperturbed his wife was when the thugs waltzed in like they owned his tastefully furnished living room.

“I paid the thugs. I gave the instruction for them to be on standby. I alerted them when my husband was settled in the living room to watch his favourite wrestling match. Their brief was to beat my husband up and they did a good job. They gave Harry a good beating and he couldn’t believe I was there telling the guys not to break any bone. I told him I wanted him to have a taste of his own medicine and that since I couldn’t serve him myself, I brought the boys to help me force-feed him.’

Of course it wasn’t a pretty sight and the aftermath was even uglier. Bruised face, bruised ego, Harry threatened (this time, only verbally) to deal with his wife. He would get her arrested, sue her for assault, attempted murder, even armed robbery, though the boys only stole his pride. They made Harry beg for his life, made him apologize to Bisi and made him promise he would never lay a finger on her. In self defence, Bisi showed Harry a gallery of past photos of double lips, black eyes, plastered and bandaged limbs from past beatings. She counter-threatened to make a media-mince meat of Harry if he called in the police. Harry considered what that kind of mess could do to his business, his image, his mother’s status in church, counted his teeth with his tongue and decided to close the chapter.

I know a lot of men are angry with this kind of end to this kind of story. They prefer when a woman is taught a lesson she’d never forget. Well, I don’t understand the angst. Harry had been teaching Bisi all kinds of lessons for two years. Why is Bisi’s one lesson a big deal?

Seriously, this piece is not about women who slap men or the propriety of retaliation. It’s about the risk mothers of abusive men run when their abused daughter-in-law decides to fight back. What if Bisi didn’t ‘supervise’ Harry’s lessons? What if she was so angry that she told the thugs to break Harry’s legs or his knee-caps?

What if an abused-daughter in-law decides to poison her husband? What then? So, before you start a self-righteous speech, sit in a Daddy’s chair, a Mummy’s chair and consider the view. If your son is an abusive husband, you risk a loss, an irreversible loss.

May all our children outlive us.

Re – Young men, older women

I just went through this your very interesting piece and I discovered that you are not looking at the angle of the woman trying herself out with ‘another dish’ after 18 years of eating ‘the same dish’ that refused to ‘belleful’ her or the woman going for the boy out of vendetta!

I know a woman who was married as a virgin who didn’t conceive for the 22 years she was eating the ‘dish from her husband’ but got belleful when she ‘tried another dish’.

To be fair to her, she didn’t do it on purpose. She ‘ate outside’ in response to the painful discovery that the husband had impregnated a woman out of their wedlock and had two children. The madam of the house discovered that her husband hid the new woman in another town away from her. He secured a teaching appointment for her and settled her in a nicely furnished apartment.

All these was smooth-sailing until the second baby arrived and some sympathetic busybody who was aware of the affair decided to inform the madam with hard evidence of the video of the naming ceremony, photographs of the new baby and the other baby as well as of the woman and the address of her house. Real CIA stuff!

She confronted the man with the evidence and he owned up to the act!

Apparently betrayed that her husband of 22 years could be sowing in another farm without her knowledge, she parted ways with her husband and stayed away from him in protest.

It was during that protestation that she met this dude who is just some four months older than her. She too ‘allowed another farmer to sow in her own farm’. And she got pregnant!

Of course, she didn’t know how a freshly pregnant woman behaves until she got to the hospital trying to treat malaria. It was at the hospital she was told she was up against ‘omolaria’. And wahala ensued!

Wahala because she hadn’t formally divorced the man, they only separated for 18 months! And how could a woman whose husband hadn’t touched for 12 months upwards suddenly be seen with big belle?

So, in this case of the Kogi V-Cs wife, it is a possibility that she too had heard of some escapades of her husband and that the V-C had sowed his wild oats in some varsity girls’ gardens and maybe one or two are already with children for him.

It’s also a possibility that the man could also be starving her of sex!

Maybe this sex-starved woman too then felt cheated and wanted to get back at the V-C and therefore enticed -yes enticed, this 300L student to drill her own hole too!

And the result was pregnancy!

So, it’s not only about the boy coming from a bad home but also of a woman deliberately enticing him.

I once heard the story of an Hijab-wearing housewife, mother of four, who was married as a virgin and had remained faithful. But after her husband started going around with other women, she too deliberately went to sleep with other men to satisfy herself and get back at the man!

Editor mi, please tell Professor Abigail to look at those key angles of a woman on a revenge mission and the possibility of their bloods not matching too.

Egbemode could be reached via [email protected]

Christmas: When despair challenges hope

0

By Gloria Mabeiam Ballason, Esq

In Nigeria, many celebrated the 2024 Christmas without the merry. In the evening of Sunday 22 December, 14 people from Ari Doh of Ganawuri, in Plateau state, including a pregnant woman and a one-year-old baby, were gruesomely murdered. The Irigwe people believe that the murder was perpetrated by a combined operation of Fulani militias and security personnel attached to the Ari Doh Checkpoint, Sector 6. In 2023, it was more grim: 200 people were killed and over 500 injured in series of armed attacks that occurred between 23 and 25 December, 2023 in 17 rural communities of Bokkos and Barkin Ladi of Plateau state. To be clear, this is not a contest of murder figures; the death of one citizen is one too many.

The Ganawuri killings were preceded by lethal food stampedes in Oyo, Anambra and Abuja all of which claimed over 80 lives. The organizers of the philanthropic gestures have been arrested. The good they sort to do has now caused unspeakable pain. We must focus on the circumstances that have made these avoidable deaths possible: a Tinubu economy so harrowing that parents fling their children into arenas to lap up morsels to stitch body and soul together. These victims tragically exchanged hunger for their lives. It doesn’t get any more excruciating than that.

By Christmas day, the itinerary of mass atrocities would prove to have more in store: Nigerian military fighters bombed innocent people in Gidan Sama and Rumtuwa communities in Sokoto State, resulting in the loss of at least 10 precious lives.

The military claimed it was a mistake that intercepted their efforts at stamping out the terrorists ravaging the nation. The problem is this sort of mistake has become all too common and the number of innocent lives exterminated to reach terrorists is simply, unjustifiable.

The Sokoto accidental killings has added up with the “Ocean of Innocent Blood Flowing In Eastern Nigeria,” report statistics published by the International Society for Civil Rights and Rule of Law, which alleges that Nigerian security operatives have killed about 32,000 civilians and extorted N3trn in the South East part of Nigeria.

The said report also states that thousands were unlawfully detained and tortured, whereas over 6,000 were blindfolded or face-bagged and bundled at late night from the East.

In another breath, the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) reports that N2.23trillion was paid as ransom to terrorists in twelve months. How dizzying does it get?

But what is Christmas if despair can muster such audacity to challenge hope? It reminds of King
Herod’s obsession with an infant- a preoccupation so extreme he was willing to kill thousands of babies to reach that one baby he imagined would rival his kingship but who in reality was born for a different kingdom.

I often wonder what threat Jesus posed, for even if He were to be fed the most potent baby formula; how could he possibly have grown exponentially enough to be a contender to Herod’s throne? Yet Herod would have none of it. The illogicality of Herod’s actions led to a nadir of suffering and the wiping out of a generation. Herod’s model continues to be used by tyrants today.

Take Hunger: With 70.8 million hectares of agricultural land, the seventh largest globally, Nigeria has no business courting lack and hunger.

Consider resource-related killings: pauperized villagers live on wealth mines and never really know why they are massacred until they learn that there are resources that attract organized killings. If the government holds resources in trust then that trust should yield an even distribution otherwise the principle of quicquid plantatur solo solo cedit (fixtures of the land belongs to the land) should apply so the people till their ground and live by it.

Turning to the tragic case in Sokoto, it must now be asked if military precision is no longer attainable and if collateral damage should be imbibed as state art. On 6th December, 2023 over 300 unarmed civilians were killed by Nigeria’s military at Igabi local government of Kaduna state while trying to exterminate terrorists. Surely, the unfortunate incident which happened barely a year ago, ought to have been a learning curve- assuming without conceding, that learning was needed on the execution field.

Amidst reminiscing about these tragedies I sat in a pew on Christmas morning as the President of the COCIN Church read from Exodus 3:7-9, a text I thought was unusual for Christmas. God, in that scripture heard and saw the misery of the Israelites in Egypt, the land of their captivity, and the Almighty decided to act by sending Moses as their deliverer just as He sent Jesus as the Saviour after seeing the misery of mankind occasioned by sin. The Preacher went on to urge us to keep our eyes and ears on human suffering and to act on it.

The hardship of Nigerians is man made. The angst will come to an end when people of goodwill resist the reign of despondency and in its place, enthrone hope; only then will the Nigerian people who dwell in darkness find light and the land where death casts its shadow, find life. Merry Christmas!

Ballason is the Chief Executive Officer of the House of Justice and may be reached at [email protected]

Let us approve Sharia Law and Courts in Iwo, Osun State but let it be funded by the Emir of Iwo

0

By Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja

In the year 2004, immediately after graduation from the Nigerian Law School, myself and another lawyer from the now Rivers State University, saw on the list of NYSC (National Youth Service Corps) that we were posted to Sokoto State.

My first thoughts were “why me oh God?”, “what have I done wrong?” “To the best of my abilities,I have tried to lead a religious life throughout my five years at the University as an undergraduate, I didn’t not join any secret cult, I did not indulge in other vices. Now why was it that I was being posted to Sokoto State instead of a nearby State to Rivers State, which is my state of origin?”. These were the initial thoughts that ran through my head.

My parents were not the type that intervened in anything like this, they were not like parents that would pay money to change my posting from Sokoto State to a nearby State. My father as a lawyer was too proud to beg anyone and my mother was a school teacher who did not have connections to any high ranking public officials.

All they did was provide me with the funds to travel to Sokoto State to resume my NYSC service.

I still remember the nine hour journey from Abuja to Sokoto State, with a stop over at TALATA MARFARA at Zamfara State for lunch.

I was initially posted to the Sokoto State Ministry of Justice but later I was re-assigned to the Legal Aid Council of Nigeria, Sokoto State Office.

It proved to be one of the most memorable episodes in my lifetime.

I was assigned as a Duty Solicitor to the Sharia Courts in Sokoto State and my task was to provide legal representation to the indigent persons of Sokoto State at the Sharia Courts.

Hon. Justice Tambuwal, a judge of the Sokoto State Sharia Courts took me under his wings, after he closed from daily court sessions, he gave me private lectures on the legal authorities under the four schools of Sharia law (Hanafi, Hanbali, Shafi’i and Maliki).

As a result of the combination of these private lectures and my daily representation of clients at the Sharia Courts, I became so proficient that I wrote and published my first book entitled: “Access to Justice in Sharia Courts”. The then Director-General of the Legal Aid Council of Nigeria also gave me a letter of commendation as the best performing NYSC lawyer.

However, two days before the launch of the said book, I saw a dark side of some persons who are so-called adherents of Sharia law.

The foreword to the said book was authored by the then Sultan of Sokoto in the year 2005.

These so-called adherents of Sharia law are not open to any form of criticisms no matter how constructive. A one line sentence in the said book was all it took for them to completely reject the said book.

They pronounced a “fatwa” on me and as they say the rest is history. I am still thankful to Almighty God Jehovah that I am alive to write this.

I am thankful that they resorted to writing to the NYSC Sokoto State to state their grievances.

However, that book proved very instrumental because years later, the British Institute of International and Comparative Law gave me a job as a Research Fellow on Study of Age of Criminal Responsibility of Children Under Islamic Law of Iran based on their review of the said book.

What I learned from that experience is that some Islamic Law adherents and proponents do not believe in dialogue and debate with others who hold any different opinions before they can reach any conclusion.

So if they must insist on having it their own way, no problem, let them establish Sharia law and courts within their jurisdictions but let the funding come from their own coffers.

Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja is a Senior Research Fellow/Legislative Drafting Lawyer at NILDS, National Assembly of Nigeria.

Kelvin Emmanuel: Nigeria’s economy is structurally skewed to favour Lagos

By Faridah Abdulkadiri

Kelvin Emmanuel has criticised economic injustice in Nigeria, emphasising the structural bias favouring Lagos over other regions.

Economist, Kelvin Emmanuel has criticised Nigeria’s economic structure, describing it as unjust and heavily skewed in favour of Lagos. 

Speaking during an interview on ARISE NEWS on Sunday, he questioned the federal government’s commitment to developing ports outside Lagos, citing the Akwa Ibom deep sea port as an example. 

“It is economic injustice and Nigeria is structurally skewed to favour Lagos economy, and this is the basic truth,” he said. 

“Bollore, the French company, ended up selling itself to MSC, Mediterranean Shipping Company. Mediterranean said they are doing revalidation, why is the federal government not putting as much effort in making sure that they start building Akwa Ibom deep sea port like they did for Lekki deep sea port in Lekki Free Trade Zone?”  

“How can Lagos have 3 functioning sea ports, the fourth one in the works, and every other place is languishing? How do you build an economy when everything is centred around Lagos? Is it because the Lagos establishment is afraid that if there is an operational sea port in the eastern maritime flank, which geographically is better for maritime operations, we are going to have diversion of port operations from the South East to South South, the North East to Akwa Ibom? Is it because they are afraid of revenue losses? It doesn’t make any sense, we have to say the truth to power.”

The Economist emphasised the importance of decentralising port operations and investing in infrastructure across the country to create a more balanced economy, calling for significant reforms in Nigeria’s economic policies to address structural imbalances and foster equitable development. 

“First of all, I would like to commend the Taiwo Oyedele committee that has done very fantastic work over the last 14 months on the tax bills, very fantastic work that cuts through every sector,” Emmanuel said. 

“I would like to say that this is the most consequential reform that Nigeria has seen since it got independence in 1960, and I am very, very optimistic that the tax bills, when they are passed, are going to raise the revenue, especially tax-to-GDP ratio, and are going to strengthen the fiscal structure of Nigeria.”

Highlighting the state of Nigeria’s ports, Emmanuel criticised the over-reliance on Lagos, pointing out that other ports in the country are underutilised. 

“Of the six different ports in Nigeria—Warri, Onne, Calabar, Apapa, Tin Can—how many of them are operational today?” he questioned. 

“The Calabar sea port is dead; we barely have vessels coming there, maybe one vessel per week compared to Lagos. How do you build an economy where the smallest state by landmass, with the highest per capita income and the highest population, has the only functioning sea port in Nigeria while everybody else is left to go home hand-dry? It doesn’t make sense.”

Emmanuel urged the federal government to prioritise projects such as the Akwa Ibom deep sea port, which he noted has strategic advantages over Lagos ports. 

“The Akwa Ibom deep sea port, by the way, has a shore-to-sea that is 16 kilometres; it is the shortest distance to deep sea in the whole of Nigeria. It’s shorter than Lagos, shorter than what you have in Lekki, shorter than Apapa, shorter than Tin Can, shorter than the proposed Badagry deep sea port,” he said.

He also criticised the lack of infrastructure in the South East, particularly the absence of a high-pressure gas transmission pipeline in the region. 

“The South East does not have a pipe that runs through it, despite the fact that Abia State produces a lot of natural gas,” Emmanuel said. He added that the Nigerian Gas Master Plan, designed in 2007, proposed a pipeline from Aba to Owerri, Enugu, Onitsha, and Nnewi, but the government opted to redirect the pipeline away from the region.

Emmanuel called on the South East Governors Forum to address these issues with urgency, stating, 

“Why has the South East Governors Forum not gotten a meeting with the president asking why the region does not have a gas pipe that runs through it? What exactly is wrong that seems like there is a calculated power share between the North West and the South West?”

When asked about the role of the new Ministry of Blue Economy in decentralising port operations, Emmanuel expressed scepticism about the federal government’s commitment. 

“If the president is serious and means what he says when he talks about revitalising the economy and building a trillion-dollar economy, he should be at the forefront, leading the charge to ensure building and development starts,” he said.

On the broader issue of decentralising port operations, Emmanuel stated, 

“If states could just go ahead and build sea ports, you might have maybe four or five deep sea ports in the eastern maritime corridor by now, but that is not possible. You need regulatory approval, and you need the federal government to contribute its share to the project, which is 20 percent.”

He urged the federal government to prioritise strategic investments, such as the Akwa Ibom deep sea port, to foster equitable economic development. 

“This is the most critical project for Akwa Ibom State, and it is a very important project for the entire South East, South South, North Central, and North East,” Emmanuel said. “It makes such economic sense that if the government is not pushing it and has gone cold, then there is another agenda on the table.”

Credits: Arise News