Home Blog

My husband infected me, detained me because I’m owing him – Business woman

A businesswoman, Joy Smart-Chinenye, has revealed how she was arrested, brutalized, tortured, and detained by monitoring unit personnel of the Nigeria Police Force Headquarters in Lagos based on a petition filed by her husband, George Obinna Smart Unaegbu, over alleged debt to him.

The incident which took place on Sunday (Mothers Day) was said to have elicited a serious drama, wild condemnation and is already causing ripples among the police hierarchy.

Her explanation was contained in a statement released by her lawyer, Ifeanyi Ejiofor, titled, “Betrayed, Tortured, and Extorted – My Husband’s Cruelty Knows No Bounds”, obtained by journalists in Abuja.

Ejiofor, also lawyer to the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), had in his reaction to the police brutality described the action of the police as unconstitutional.

According to him, Section 4 of the Nigeria Police Act clearly outlines the duties of the NPF, making no provision for debt recovery.

Joy Smart-Chinenye said, “As I write this, I am in severe agony, tears, and unbearable pain. While mothers across the world celebrated Mothering Sunday, my own husband, the man I once loved and supported, threw me into Abattoir-SARS detention in Abuja – a facility notorious for holding condemned criminals, kidnappers, and terrorists.

“This is the same man I met when he was just a classroom teacher. I stood by him, fed him, supported him financially, and watched as God elevated him to a multi-billionaire. But how did he repay me? By having me brutalized, arrested, and locked away in one of the most dreaded cells in the country.

“Despite my unwavering fidelity and loyalty throughout our marriage, he has slept with both single and married women, exposing me to multiple infections. I have endured humiliation and betrayal in silence, keeping our marital issues out of the public eye, yet he continues to find ways to destroy me.

“This time, his weapon was the Nigeria Police Force. He manipulated them into arresting me over an alleged debt – a personal, civil matter that should have been settled in court, not through police brutality. On March 27, 2025, officers stormed our home, forcibly took me away in front of our children, and detained me at FCID Annex, Panti, Lagos, where I was tortured and coerced into transferring ₦5 million to an account they provided.

“When I could not meet his remaining demands, I was forcefully transported to Abuja, where I was detained at Abattoir, enduring further abuse, torture and extortion.

“I was repeatedly taken from the SARS detention cell at night to unknown locations, where I was subjected to intense coercion and intimidation. These harrowing experiences continued until the timely intervention of Barrister Ifeanyi Ejiofor ( I. C. Ejiofor Chambers), whose relentless legal efforts finally secured my release in the wee hours of last night. But the scars – both physical and emotional – remain.

“I can no longer stay silent. In due course, I will grant a press release and expose the full truth about Obinna George Smart Unaegbu. The world deserves to know.”

Uncertainty as alleged copies of Edo tribunal judgement surfaces online

Documents said to be a judgement of the Edo State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal have surfaced online and across social media platforms.

The documents surfaced barely 24 hours after the panel summoned all parties involved in the case to appear before it on April 2, 2025, for judgement delivery.

The unexpected appearance of the documents has sparked confusion and debate over the tribunal’s final ruling.

The three-member panel, led by Justice Wilfred Kpochi, had on March 3 reserved judgement on the petition filed by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its candidate, Asuerinme Ighodalo, challenging the result of the September 21, 2024, governorship election.

However, before the official ruling could be delivered, copies of what seemed to be the judgement circulated widely on the internet, revealing a split decision among the judges.

According to the leaked documents, the tribunal’s chairman, Justice Kpochi, and another panel member, Justice A. B. Yusuf, ruled in favour of Governor Monday Okpebholo, dismissing the PDP’s petition and upholding his election.

However, the third judge, Justice A. A. Adewole, disagreed.

In his minority judgement, he reportedly declared that Okpebholo’s election was invalid due to irregularities and ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to issue a fresh Certificate of Return to Ighodalo as the rightful winner.

Justice Adewole was said to have based his decision on alleged non-compliance with the Electoral Act, stating that the total valid votes showed Ighodalo had 243,113 votes while Okpebholo had 210,326.

He argued that the PDP’s case was not properly countered and that evidence showed the final election results were incorrectly declared.

In contrast, the majority decision of the tribunal acknowledged certain irregularities but stated that the PDP failed to prove they were substantial enough to affect the overall outcome.

Justice Kpochi and Justice Yusuf referenced previous Supreme Court rulings, asserting that while errors in collation and exclusions were found, they did not change the margin of victory or prove that Ighodalo had more lawful votes.

In the lead and majority decision of the tribunal, its Chairman, Justice Kpochi, held that “while there was credible evidence of non-compliance particularly concerning section 73(2) (failure to record serial numbers in EC 25B) and section 51(2) (over-voting) the petitioners failed to demonstrate that these breaches substantially affected the outcome of the election as required under section 135(1) of the Electoral Act.

“On the issue of the majority of lawful votes, the petitioners established instances of incorrect collation and exclusion of results. However, their mathematical and documentary evidence did not conclusively establish that the margin of lead was overtaken or that they scored the highest number of lawful votes.”

Relying on the Supreme Court decided cases in Oyetola Vs Adeleke, 2023, 10NWLR (Pt 1892), as well as Atiku Vs INEC (2023), 19NWLR, pt. 1927, the panel held that the petitioners failed to prove not only that non-compliance occured, but also that it was substantial enough to have affected the result of the election.

Adding that the petitioners ought to have tied every complaint to figures, demonstrated the net effect of each infraction and shown that for the violation the outcome would have changed.

“We find that the petitioners have not discharged the dual burden to the satisfaction of the law.

“Accordingly, the petition lacks merit and is hereby dismissed,” the document further read.

The situation has raised concerns over the security of judicial documents and the credibility of the process.

See documents below:

Re: Chidi Odinkalu’s Sunday Jackson is a victim of a miscarriage of justice, By Prof. R.A.C.E Achara

Part of what the author wrote was that:

“For nearly three years until 2018, Numan was the site of a murderous war between sedentary farmers and armed pastoralists. No one knows the number who lost their lives in this conflict… In suggesting that Sunday Jackson had a reasonable means of escape, the Supreme Court showed almost blissful lack of awareness of the nature of the conflict on the floodplains of the Benue River (and its tributaries)… The standard of evidentiary assessment deployed by the Supreme Court required Sunday Jackson to possess almost divine knowledge of the surrounding circumstances. Asking him to run in the middle of this required him to be certain that there was no other danger around him. There was no way that he or anyone could in the middle of an active conflict zone have attained that degree of knowledge or awareness…”

What did the High Court (HC) find as fact on this point?

Did defence counsel raise the circumstance of war as a peculiar defining consideration for the HC in the evaluation of the evidence?

If so, what did the HC say after considering the point? If not, did counsel concede that the present facts were not conditioned by the farmer – herder war? In the event, would it be right for the HC judge to ignore the facts as presented by the parties through their counsel and instead to conjure his own facts and thereupon to rule according to imagination?

More importantly, did the appellant raise these extenuating circumstances on intermediate appeal to the Court of Appeal (CA)?

What did the CA decide about the credibility and validity or not of the point?

If the three justices of appeal upheld the findings of the HC judge on this question of fact, shall we say that the four adjudicators were incompetent or biased against this particular accused person? Why?

It is only after the answers to the foregoing questions that, on this matter of pure facts (there’s no shred of disputation on law here) that we can meaningfully question what the additional five justices of the Supreme Court (SC) did or did not do in reviewing the judgments of lower courts through the judgment and record of appeal at the intermediate appellate court.

This would be a minimum of nine experienced lawyers who became judges and who have intimately listened directly to the witnesses (whom we have not seen or listened to) and or have directly had access to and studied all the relevant documents admitted into evidence where the parties and witnesses had mostly contemporaneously stated what had or had not transpired; and, even read and seen material that although produced in evidence had eventually not been admitted as exhibits for use in the evaluation and judgment (much of which merely reading the judgment we have had no access to).

It is possible that nine judges in three tiers of our superior courts and with the assistance of competent counsel (some with Nigerian and international legal certifications) had nevertheless concurrently but wrongly ruled one way on the facts. But if this is the case, any neutral lawyer is entitled to require evidence of error or misconduct much higher than just a speculative criticism about an ongoing herder-farmer war. Otherwise, we might as well submit that in any site of bloody conflict, regardless of evidence in particular cases, cold-blooded murder is permissible and requirements that trigger our laws on self-defence are suspended!

Surely that cannot be the case because even in the field of declared international war, a soldier who shoots a surrendering soldier is treated no better than any other villainous murderer!

Four students from “influential Nigerian family” arrested, narcotics worth millions seized after drug ring bust in India

The India’s Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB), along with Delhi Police, busted a drug cartel, arrested five suspects including four foreign students from an “influential Nigerian family” and seized MDMA, high-quality crystal meth and Afghan heroin worth Rs 27 crore. Traditional Nigerian cuisine

The raid was conducted in the Chattarpur area of Delhi on Monday, March 31, 2025.

Announcing the seizure in a statement on the social media platform X, Union Home Minister Amit Shah praised the agencies, saying, “Our relentless hunt against the illicit trade continues.”

According to officials, the NCB and the Delhi Police’s Special Cell traced the source of the drugs to a rented accommodation of an African national, where the MDMA was being synthesised.

Five, including four African nationals belonging to an influential family of Nigeria, have been arrested, a senior MHA official said.

Acting on inputs about a high-quality methamphetamine transaction in the Chhatarpur area, a joint team of NCB and the Special Cell intercepted a vehicle carrying 5.103 kg of crystal methamphetamine, valued at Rs 10.2 crore.

Questioning of the accused and technical tracking led them to an ‘African Kitchen’ in West Delhi’s Tilak Nagar, identified as the source of the contraband.

From this location, 1.156 kgs of crystal methamphetamine, 4.142 kgs of Afghan heroin, and 5.776 kgs of MDMA (Ecstasy pills) have been recovered, officials said.

Further probing led to a follow-up search at a rented apartment in Greater Noida, from where 389 grams of Afghan heroin and 26 grams of cocaine were recovered.

According to the officials, the accused are students of private universities in NCR and Punjab. Besides drugs, they are also suspected to be involved in the cryptocurrency trade.

Four students from "influential Nigerian family" arrested, narcotics worth millions seized after drug ring bust in India
Four students from "influential Nigerian family" arrested, narcotics worth millions seized after drug ring bust in India

Oh! When The Saints Go Marching In: Governor Fubara, Edison O. Ehie and Hon. Justice Simeon Amadi, RCA, etc. as the true heroes of democracy and rule of law in Rivers State

By Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja

Louis Armstrong is one of the greatest jazz musicians of all time.

He popularised a song that goes by the title: “Oh! When The Saints Go Marching In”.

Some of the lyrics are as follows:

“Oh, when the saints (when the saints)
Go marching in (marching in)
Now, when the saints go marching in (marching in)
Yes, I want to be in that number
When the saints go marching in.”

The song is based on the religious belief that one day, there will be a roll call and entrance granted to either heaven or paradise for the “saints” that is: those whom are declared righteous by Almighty God because of the good deeds that they did during their lifetime.

Using the lyrics of this song as a metaphor, when the history of the heroes of democracy and adherence to the rule of law in Rivers State is written, some names will be on that roll call and others would not!!!

Governor Fubara has written his name in gold and he would definitely be one of those who would be marching in, when the saints go marching in!!!

For his refusal to voluntarily hand over ₦ 6 billion per month out of the commonwealth of Rivers State as a bribe to Wike!!!

Edison O. Ehie, Chief of Staff to Governor Fubara would also be marching in when the saints go marching in.

For his refusal to accept a bribe of ₦ 5 billion for the impeachment of Governor Fubara in October 2023!!!!

Hon. Justice Simeon Amadi, Chief Judge of Rivers State would also be marching in when the saints go marching in for his refusal to support the second attempt at impeachment of Governor Fubara during the month of March 2025.

Rt. Hon. Rotimi Chibuike Amaechi (RCA) for speaking out publicly to condemn President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s declaration of a State of Emergency in Rivers State, he too will go marching in when the saints go marching in!!!

In response to one of my previous articles, a lawyer had tried to praise Wike as one of the “saints that would be marching in” when the roll call of Rivers State is made.

Unfortunately, the only criterion that the said lawyer applied was that Wike had empowered a list of about 50 Rivers State indigenes via appointments into different federal government agencies!!!

In response, I wrote to the said lawyer:

“..you are entitled to your views about Wike and you have expressed your opinion… however, there is a question that a wife asked her husband in the 1995 movie named “Heat” starring Al Pacino, Robert DeNiro etc…” so because he saved your limb, you have to repay him with your life”?

Whatever good Wike appears to be doing for a few Rivers State men and women (I listed about 50 not adding the 27 law-makers of the Rivers State House of Assembly and the 23 LGA Chairmen), is nullified by the evil that Wike has inflicted upon the remaining over five million INDIGENES of Rivers State, whom are forced to live under the State of Emergency declared by PBAT since 19th March 2025!!!”

Now,the gloves are off-the illegal tenure extension of the boss of the Nigerian Immigration Service by PBAT

By Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja

According to the Oxford Dictionary, the British idiom, “gloves are off” is “used to convey that something will be done in an uncompromising or ruthless way.”

It’s origin comes from the game of boxing.

Due to the dangerous nature of the game of boxing, which initially started as bare-knuckle fighting which often resulted in the death of participants, boxing gloves were invented to cushion the impact of punches by participants!!!

So the expression: “the gloves are off” implies that a participant in any game of boxing has abandoned the use of boxing gloves with the intention of beating the opponent to death!!!

It appears that for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu (PBAT), the gloves are off!!!

The evidence lies in the recent extension of the tenure of the Comptroller-General of the Nigerian Immigration Service, by PBAT.

Unlike the extension of the tenure of the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) which was achieved by an amendment of the relevant legislation which was submitted to the National Assembly by PBAT.

At least in that instance, the National Assembly pretended to follow the law-making process (even though they skipped the public hearing aspect of law-making) and used their favourite methods of voice votes!!!

This time around PBAT did not make any pretence to adhere to any rule of law.

He just made an order to that effect followed by the issuance of a public statement which was announced on 31st March 2025 by his Special Adviser on Information and Strategy, Mr. Bayo Onanuga.

It appears that the Declaration of the State of Emergency in Rivers State by PBAT on 18th March 2025 was used as a litmus test to gauge the reaction of the members of the Nigerian public!!!

Since there were no mass protests by the members of the Nigerian public when both the National Assembly and PBAT violated provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 in their enactment of the law relating to the Declaration of the State of Emergency in Rivers State.

Both PBAT and the National Assembly are emboldened to commit more similar blatant acts of non-compliance with both the Nigerian Constitution and other relevant laws!!!

It is a very integral part of human nature, that even the holy book acknowledges when it says:

“Because sentence against a bad deed has not been executed speedily, the heart of men becomes emboldened to do bad.”- Ecclesiastes 8:11.

As former first lady, Patience Goodluck Jonathan will say: “Continue, there is God ohh”

Thou judge -basher, can you look in the mirror pls?

Anonymous


We are all so good at Judge-bashing as if we are all saints. How many here have not at one time or the other contributed to the rot that we are gleefully complaining about endlessly? Talk is cheap, especially when at the expense of others. The Judiciary is not smelling of roses just like every other segment of our society, admitted. We are all guilty, but because scapegoating is convenient, we sit in the comfort of our various homes and point accusing fingers at people who can’t answer back.

This is not by any means a defence of judicial officers. It is to make the point that the hypocrisy is even more nauseating than the crime alleged. Judges are lame ducks, so they are easy scapegoats for you. Have you checked yourself in the mirror? It is easy to forget the sacrifices that our judges make daily and the agonies they go through, many under terrible conditions in the remotest parts of this nation, to keep the ship of the country afloat. By all means, criticize them when necessary. But, can you pls first search yourself and honestly vouch that you have not, one time or the other in your over 40 years career, contributed knowingly or otherwise, to what you accuse others of?

How many of you have had golden opportunities to come to the bench and make a difference but refused because you preferred an easier life? Truly, the judiciary, as other sectors of our existence as a nation, needs rebirth. No question. And judges are the first to admit so. But what are you yourself doing to contribute to that rebirth apart from just enjoying the sadistic fervor of bashing judges on this platform?

Some of you are politicians, and you know in your hearts the sins you have committed to judicial rot. You think God is happy with you for your secret sins and open display of Puritanism? Some of you in business know what you have done in your organizations in your desperate moments to compromise the judiciary. Prove me wrong, Oga. Your conscience is judging you, right?

How many times have you sought one favor or the other from a judge friend? You think that is not part of it, abi? Ok. Your conscience will judge you, not me. How Many of you who have invited your judge friends to your children’s weddings or your concubine’s child naming have been careful to host your judge guests in an inner room instead of serving them food and wine in the open? Will you pls first remove the log in your own eyes pls?


Can we do with this annoying hypocrisy and admit our faults and join hands while we still can, to do what is right, howsoever small in our small corners to make the system better? Those of you who are professors, what are you doing in secret with our daughters? You think you are ok, Abi? Blessed indeed are those whose sins are covered
Oga head of chambers, can your juniors vouch for your integrity?
Let every man be a liar, and God alone true!

Response by one who would not want to be named.

Milord, bless you. But I hope this is not a direct response to my earlier post on the lowering of the standard of judicial officers specifically and generally. Milord has spoken well for both sides, though with a tilt to make those bold enough to say all is not well guilty.

Trust me, we check the mirrors regularly! All is not well with the bar largely and the bench to some extent. Outspoken judges and lawyers who sometimes act as defenders and watchdogs must endure the criticism that their self-appointed mission entails. We owe that to posterity and our conscience. Must we keep quiet? I say No! As a lawyer and watchdog, I can speak with humility and a bit of authority.

I surmise that there is an acknowledgement of the lowering of standards by most observers. I speak because I’ve had close family members as judges, even as heads of court. Spouse was in the business of judging others, too. Some retired or died. I even had the privilege of being in JSC at the state level. With that as the background, I must humbly agree with Milord that, yes, while we must first remove the spec in our own eyes as we check the mirrors, we can’t close our eyes to the logs we see daily in the eyes of those society holds to a higher bar.

They shoulder a more onerous burden because of their powers of life and death. They are supposed to be better than us. They are next to God. They can and indeed should earn our utmost respect, and they often do. To whom much is given in terms of power and authority, much is expected. Lawyers are less regulated than our judex. The bulk of the acts of omission and commission committed by lawyers are made permissible by what Milord referred to in his post.

Why do we allow them to get away with blue murder? Where is the courage to sanction or render disapproval in our decisions? I hate to talk of myself, but I can modestly make bold to say I have not influenced anyone, be it classmates, friends, or family levels to do wrong. I will not even bring it up. When it became tedious to realise my financial dream in the profession without doing “man no man,” I activated my innate business talents to thrive financially. Even then, I remain committed to the bar in ways many could not.

Where does all this lead us? Reform, reform, reform!! We either reform or die! My uncle is close to 90 now. After more than 25 years on the bench and a lifetime of service as state counsel, DPP, etc, he had to retire to his father’s house. When it was his turn to be a CJ, the military imported someone from another state to take over, even though the constitution says a judge from the State following seniority in that state ought to be in line! There’re many internal and external defects that brouggt the justice sector to where we are now. There are outstanding judex who suffered daily under excruciating conditions. I should know.

My uncle lives in the house left for him by his late father, completely blind. We continue to help. Yes, things are not right in many respects, but it’s not all who want change and seek a return to the glorious days who have specs in their eyes. We talk because we want a better society where the judiciary is truly the last hope of citizens of this country that we all love. There is sordid stuff that I have witnessed in my 70 years on earth pertaining to the rot in the system.

If those of us who are part of the justice system can’t and won’t talk, and our judex can’t talk, who then will talk? That is my worry. By all means, we commend, applaud, and continue to support our friends on the bench without fear or favour. We don’t just talk. We act, too, to the glory of God and the betterment of this profession we love. We will continue to ask that the logs be reduced to a manageable level whenever we observe any. The glory of the administration of justice that compares to best in the world is what we all deserve, for the good of our beautiful homeland.

A Comprehensive Review of “Counted Out”: A powerful documentary on how math shapes opportunity and our daily lives


Film produced by Vicki Abeles (Counted Out)

Math is power.

A world where technology, data, and algorithms dictate almost every aspect of our lives, the new documentary Counted Out makes a compelling case for why math literacy is not just an academic subject but a critical civil rights issue. Premiering at the Cleveland International Film Festival on April 7 and the San Francisco International Film Festival on April 28, this film is set to spark nationwide conversations about the power of numbers in shaping our democracy, economy, and future opportunities.

Why Math Matters More Than Ever

Many people think of math as a school subject, something to be passed and forgotten after graduation. But Counted Out shatters this notion by revealing how math influences our everyday decisions. From the news we consume to the jobs we qualify for, from the effectiveness of our votes to the fairness of the justice system, an invisible layer of mathematics dictates who holds power and who gets left behind.

This film challenges us to ask:

Why do so many students fear math?
Why does math proficiency decline as children grow up?
What happens when only a few people truly understand the mathematical systems governing society?
Through real-life stories, expert insights, and thought-provoking analysis, Counted Out urges us to rethink our relationship with math, not as an intimidating subject, but as a vital tool for empowerment.

A Wake-Up Call for Parents and Educators

For parents, this documentary is a must-watch because it sheds light on how early a child’s confidence in math can shape their future. Many children decide they are “not math people” from a young age, often due to how the subject is taught or how they perceive their own abilities. But what if we changed that narrative?

Bob Moses, the civil rights leader whose legacy is honored in this film, believed that math access is a fundamental right. His Algebra Project aimed to equip marginalized students with the math skills they need to succeed in a technology-driven world. The documentary highlights the impact of his work and makes a powerful argument for why math education should be accessible and engaging for all children, regardless of their background.

As parents, we can take away valuable lessons from this film:

Encourage a positive attitude toward math at home.
Show children how math connects to real life, whether through budgeting, technology, or even social media algorithms.
Advocate for better math education in schools.
Why Children Should Watch Too

For young viewers, Counted Out makes math feel less like a classroom burden and more like a superpower. It demonstrates how understanding numbers can lead to exciting careers in engineering, medicine, technology, and even media. More importantly, it shows that math is not just about numbers, rather it’s about thinking critically, solving problems, and understanding the world in a deeper way.

Conclusion

Counted Out calls on all of us to recognize that math is not just for the elite or the exceptionally gifted; it’s for everyone. Whether you are a parent wanting the best for your child, a student seeking inspiration, or an educator looking to reform teaching methods, this film offers a powerful and urgent message: Math literacy is essential for social and economic equality.

A Defence For Hon. Justice Akomaye Agim, JSC

By Ikeazor Ajovi Akaraiwe, SAN

Hon. Justice Agim acquitted himself (and Nigeria) honourably as Chief Justice of our West African neighbours, The Gambia, and Justice of the Supreme Court of our Southern African neighbours, Swaziland. He was also a Professor of law at, University of The Gambia and a Lecturer at the Gambia Law School.

His tenure as Chief Justice of The Gambia is yet unparalleled in the history of that country. Military Dictator Yaya Jammeh came to have a grudging admiration for his fearlessness in giving nuanced judgments against his administration.

His Chief Justiceship brought honour to Nigeria. Upon his return to Nigeria, he was appointed to the bench of the Court of Appeal and sent to Enugu. That was where we came into contact with his scholarship, his intellectual rigour, philosophical disposition and moral excellence.

Indeed, since his elevation to the bench of the Supreme Court of Nigeria, it is unarguable that if there is only one legal philosopher at the Supreme Court, it is Agim; if there are two, Agim is one of them; and if there are three, Agim is certainly one of the three. He stands distinguished. While you may not always agree with all his judgments, if you took the trouble to read them, you will certainly appreciate his philosophical, moral and legal bent. Even if you do not agree, and it is impossible to always agree.

About the unfortunate photographs which came out of the 50th anniversary convocation of the University of Calabar, there are lessons to be learned. I am not saying that this is what happened in the case under reference, but this is political season and it is not impossible that politicians can even manipulate sitting arrangements at public events to place them strategically and proceed to ensure that the press takes such strategic photos. I repeat, I am not saying that this is what happened in the example under reference.

Thus, the Supreme Court must have a protocol team for all its justices, if it does not already have one, which should be notified of ceremonial movements of Supreme Court Justices. Secondly, the protocol team will ensure that the sort of seating arrangement that saw Hon. Justice Agim placed next to a politically exposed litigant at the University of Calabar convocation ceremonies never happens again.

As the argument rages at the bar about the advisability of judges receiving awards from institutions who may one day appear before them, it is important that learned justices of learning and character like Agim JSC are neither discouraged nor vilified except where they deserve it.

Agim’s philosophical underpinnings may be located in the lecture he delivered as keynote speaker, Law Week, NBA Ogoja branch – ROLE OF THE LAWYER IN STOPPING IMPUNITY FOR GOVERNMENT OFFICE CORRUPTION, DISMANTLING KLEPTOCRACY AND PROMOTING GENUINE DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE, when he was still a Justice of the Court of Appeal. I happened to be a speaker also at that law week. That lecture is reproduced as an addendum to this piece.

Ikeazor Ajovi Akaraiwe, SAN
1st Vice-President, NBA (2008-2010); and Chair, NBA Human Rights Institute (2008-2010).

Addendum
Lecture by Hon Justice Emmanuel Akomaye Agim JCA (as he then was) at the Law Week of NBA Ogoja Branch –
ROLE OF THE LAWYER IN STOPPING IMPUNITY FOR GOVERNMENT OFFICE CORRUPTION, DISMANTLING KLEPTOCRACY AND PROMOTING GENUINE DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE

ROLE-OF-THE-LAWYER-IN-STOPPING-IMPUNITY-FOR-GOVERNMENT-OFFICE-CORRUPTION-DISMANTLING-KLEPTOCRACY-AND-PROMOTING-GENUINE-DEMOCRATIC-GOVERNANCE1

A ‘spy’ on Fubara

By Suyi Ayodele

A sad event occurred in Uromi, Edo State last week. Some travellers described as “travelling hunters from the North” were murdered by some felons on the suspicion that the deceased were kidnappers. The whole nation rose to condemn the act.

President Bola Tinubu joined in the condemnation. He said that Nigeria had no room for jungle justice. I laughed. What did President Tinubu do in Rivers State penultimate week? What is his definition of “jungle justice’? Simple dictionary definition of ‘jungle justice’ says “is a form of public extrajudicial killings which can be found in Nigeria, Cameroon, and Bangladesh…”

When President Tinubu summarily executed democracy in Rivers State by sacking the democratically elected governor of the state alongside the entire state legislative arm against the tenets, spirits and letters of the nation’s constitution, what did he call that? What is more jungle justice than that crass decapitation of the Rivers State democratic set-up?

The Abuja scriptwriters on Governor Siminalayi Fubara of Rivers State are bad students of drama. My sense of modesty would not allow me to call them illiterate playwrights. But that is exactly what my mind tells me they are!

Nigerians are in for an episodic plot of nonsensical drama. The Abuja buccaneers that are after the blood of Fubara and the political gains of Rivers State in 2027 would stop at nothing. They need everything they can lay their hands on to justify the absurdity of a state of emergency in the oil-rich state. The bad script was written a long time ago. The execution is well-planned out.

The sack of Fubara is an event that will hunt and hurt this administration for a long time to come or until another perfidy unfolds. The dramas unfolding from that state will continue for a long time as the bad scripts keep hitting us. Unfortunately, Abuja is both deaf and dumb, intentionally! Former President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan said it all. Abuja is pretending to be asleep. Waking it up to smell the coffee of its missteps in Rivers State is an impossible task!

A Nigerian multi-billionaire once quipped: “Gentlemen, I am not as stupid as I look.” The man of wealth uttered the words to show his close top aides that he could see through their schemes. The old man, a lexicographer in his own corner, needed to let those around him know that it is not every time they tell him ‘Mr. Chairman is always right’, that he believes them!

Nigerians should borrow those words and tell the Abuja dramatists that ‘We (Nigerians) are not as stupid’ as the Abuja hawks want us to look or be! The latest drama on Governor Fubara and his alleged open plan to commit arson and compromise the security of his state as ‘dramatised’ by the ex-Head of Service (HoS) of Rivers State, Dr. George Nwaeke, is one episode that is not adding up to the entire drama of the absurd! The thriller writer James Hadley Chase once penned Believe this, you’ll believe anything.’ That appropriately situates Nwaeke’s drama in Abuja last Friday.

Fixing spies in the enemy’s camp is the pastime of all warriors. It is a tact, a practice, that is as old as the concept of intrigue itself. British foremost Prime Minister, Sir Winston Churchill, while giving the account of the defeat of the Germans in World War II says: “At this time, we had a spy in close touch with Rommel’s headquarters, who gave us accurate information…” (The second World War, Volume III, chapter XIX, page1).

Johannes Erwin Eugen Rommel (November 15, 1891 –October 14, 1944) was a German hero of World War I, with the appellation, The Desert Fox. Rommel served in the World War II as the commander of the German 7th Panzer Division, which led the 1940 invasion of France. Despite his avowed dexterity, he harboured, unknowingly, among his rank and file, a spy for the British Army. The information supplied by the spy accounted for the defeat of the Germans in 1945.

I lifted the above quote from Robert Vacha’s thriller, “A Spy for Churchill” (January 1, 1974). Born Dorab Robert Vacha on January 15, 1918, Vacha served as District Officer (D.O.) in the British Colonial Administration in Nigeria between 1950 to 1957. He was a Lieutenant Colonel in the British Army and participated in World War II. “A Spy for Churchill” is one of the most accurate accounts of how the German Army was defeated in World War II.

Without an insider giving the other forces, especially the British Army, accurate information, it would have been very difficult to defeat the Germans. The Germans themselves acknowledged the existence of a spy in their Army. One authority on the German Army’s operations, Henri Nannen Verlag, puts the incident in its proper perspective when he wrote thus:

“The reports of experts on Rommel’s staff show that an intelligent enemy Secret Service had plenty of opportunity to acquire valuable information. One man in the chain along which Rommel’s plan was passed was in the pay of the enemy. Who was it? this last question remains to be answered.” (Die Wilstenfuche, 1958, page 70).

Was Dr George Nwaeke a spy on Governor Fubara? If he was, for how long? Nwaeke was in Abuja on Friday last week, where he held a one-man ‘press conference’, and like a witch in the village square, he ‘revealed’ the ‘secrets’ he shared with Fubara and some top aides on the crisis in Rivers State.

As I watched the video of the ‘press conference’, my mind raced to the video of a similar event in Edo State in 2001. The video was about the then State Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Elder Bayo Ogbomo’s alleged resignation. Copies of the ‘resignation’ letter were sent to state correspondents. God bless the then Chairman of the Correspondents Chapel, Tony Osauzo of the Concord Newspapers. He insisted that we would not file the report until we spoke to Ogbomo.

Due to our insistence, a video of where Elder Ogbomo ‘resigned’ was shown to us. In the video was Ogbomo, but many things were wrong. One, the old man looked ruffled. Two, the office, where he made the recording appeared to be an uncompleted building. Again, in the video, Ogbomo could be seen driving away some flying insects as he read the script.

We later discovered that Ogbomo was kidnapped at Five Junction, Benin City, State Secretariat of the PDP, and was taken to an uncompleted building at the Gapiona axis of the Benin G.R.A., where he was forced to read the prepared text of his resignation. Hours later after he regained his freedom, Ogbomo issued a rebuttal, stating that he was forced at gunpoint to resign. He emphasised that he remained the PDP Secretary in the state!

That was the exact picture I got as Nwaeke read his press statement in Abuja. But he went ahead to state that he was physically present when “…Governor Siminalayi Fubara directed his Chief of Staff (Edison Ehie) to burn down the Assembly to avert his impeachment. That evening, Edison was in Government House with two other boys, including the former Chairman of Obio/Akpor LGA, one Chijioke.

He continued: “I was there with them when a bag of money was handed over to Edison for that operation, though I do not know the amount inside. I want to tell the people of Rivers State today that the House of Assembly Complex on Moscow Road was deliberately brought down by Edison Ehie under the instructions of Governor Siminalayi Fubara. I challenge him to an open confrontation, and I will provide more details.”

After listening to the above, one may be tempted to ask: Is Governor Fubara ‘as stupid as he looks?’ Who was Nwaeke in the Fubara’s cabinet that the governor would trust him so much to openly discuss an arson of such a magnitude with him? How on earth would a governor invite a civil servant to witness where the plan to burn down a government establishment was being hatched?

And if we must take Nwaeke by his words, whom did he discuss the plan with after leaving the meeting? Is the ex-HoS saying that he is such a secretive individual that he did not mention the plan he witnessed to any living object? Should that be the case, is he aware of the legalese: “accessory after the fact of crime (arson)? Is it not a criminal offence that the ex-HoS did not alert the security agencies about the plan? Why is the law dormant this time?

I don’t want to hold the brief of Fubara in this matter. Much so, I am equally aware that one of the persons Nwaeke named in the plan, Edison Ehie, the Chief of Staff to Fubara, has approached the court for redress. But I must confess that Nwaeke’s ‘confession’ is something that is too difficult for me to believe. The timing, the composure, the venue (hotel room), everything, all point to a badly written script by amateur playwrights! It is all about looking for justification for the error of a state of emergency in Rivers State!

If anybody has put a lie to the Abuja badly scripted drama, it is Florence Nwaeke, the wife of the ex-HoS of Rivers State. Like most rational Nigerians, Florence does not share the narrative of her husband. I have been asking who the closest person to Nwaeke should be than his wife. But the woman knows that her husband’s trip to Abuja was an imposed one. This was in addition to revealing that her husband was forced to resign from the service of the state.

Should we believe Mrs. Nwaeke? You can decide that after hearing her speak: “When he (Nwaeke) got to Abuja, he called that he had landed. I said, ‘Thank God. The next thing I saw this night, people were calling me and said he got an interview. I said, what interview? Interview for what? Not until I saw things flying on the internet that he granted an interview. What happened? I said, that is not my husband. That is not my husband. So, I sent him a message. I said, ‘Are you under duress?’ I sent him a message. I said, ‘Have they kidnapped you? Talk to me now. Why are you not talking to me?’ This is the message I sent to him when I saw his interview online.” What type of husband receives this type of message from his wife and will choose to keep silent?

The final expose of the Abuja deal is Nwaeke’s closing remarks, where he defended President Tinubu and thanked him and the Godswill Akpabio-led moribund National Assembly. Hear him again: “This accounts for the organised media condemnations and seeming public outcry against Mr. President and National Assembly. Those who love democracy and humanity will always protect humanity and democracy. Mr. President, you have just protected democracy and humanity in Rivers State. I can now sleep with my conscience clear.”

I was tempted here to ask, like Eyo Charles, the Daily Trust reporter in Calabar, Cross River State, once asked Femi Fani-Kayode, at a press conference thus: “Who bankrolled these trips?” I stated last week that the flight to the 2027 general election “promised bad weather”, and cautioned everyone to “fasten your seat belt, turbulence ahead”. What happened in Abuja last week is one of the turbulences ahead. Next episode, please!