Home Blog Page 968

Body Of Benchers Admits 1,785 Lawyers To Bar As 5 Bag First Class

0

As Body Of Benchers Charges Them To Uphold Rule Of Law & Pursuit Of Justice

The Body of Benchers on Tuesday called a total of 1,785 candidates to the Nigerian Bar, which usually happens after they have successfully passed the Bar Final Examination.

The Director-General of the Nigerian Law School, Prof. Isa Hayatu (SAN) who spoke at the ceremony which was held at the Eagle Square, Abuja, said 1, 779 candidates passed the January 2020 Bar final examinations, while six candidates were from previous Bar final examinations.

He said: “The candidates successfully completed the vocational training at the Nigerian Law School as prescribed by the Legal Education Act and had also taken the prescribed examinations and the dining terms and met all other required conditions set by the Council of Legal Education.

“A total of 2, 515 students participated at the examinations and a total of 1, 779 were successful, out of which five candidates were graded in first class, 76 graded in the second class upper, 633 graduated with second class lower while 1, 065 came out with a pass in the Bar final examinations.

“I am happy to affirm that they all exhibited good manners and decorum during their training. They have also been groomed in the best ethics and ethos of our noble profession,” he added.

Speaking further, he commended them for their hard work, diligence, and dedication.

The Chairman of the Body of Benchers, O. C Okocha (SAN), In his remark stated that since Nigerian Law School came into existence in 1962, the Council has always made sure that all candidates admitted into the School are given the requisite skills and knowledge, in order for them to be a sound lawyer.

Okocha, who is also a life bencher warned the new lawyers that any breach of the rules and regulations will be meted with severe census and sanctions.

He said the Body of Benchers has the power to enforce discipline and decorum at the Bar and that the exercise of the power is done through the instrumentality of the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC), which is a standing committee of the Body of Benchers.

He urged them to be of good character and uphold honesty and integrity, which is the hallmark of the legal profession, and to conduct themselves as respectable lawyers.

FG Moves To Regulate Crypto Currencies, Other Digital Investments

Nigeria’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Monday announced that it would begin to regulate digital currencies and crypto-based companies.

A statement by SEC said the general objective of regulation is not to hinder technology or stifle innovation but to create standards that encourage ethical practices that ultimately make for a fair and efficient market.

The Nigerian government had in the past described digital currencies as illegal and warned its citizens against it.https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-2023028789149162&output=html&h=250&slotname=5559997686&adk=1577778870&adf=297297444&w=300&lmt=1600196721&psa=1&guci=2.2.0.0.2.2.0.0&format=300×250&url=https%3A%2F%2Fthenigerialawyer.com%2Ffg-moves-to-regulate-crypto-currencies-other-digital-investments%2F&flash=0&wgl=1&adsid=ChEI8MyB-wUQguy38Kqhgrv1ARJMAFbuIuk7V07DAZLovvGULfosy-d4H0_3UDQCYKkCAnVezJ9bNk43mFzGDBVrMXy2YFkJi6fuKKXOoe4eA4AYwqpDxjf0Mm9xG9jyXQ&dt=1600203337630&bpp=3&bdt=1952&idt=2408&shv=r20200909&cbv=r20190131&ptt=9&saldr=aa&abxe=1&cookie=ID%3D83b2f805fcf6fcf5%3AT%3D1594284983%3AS%3DALNI_MYgSDAL6-c4JB29HdfUZP79yUig0A&prev_fmts=1200×280%2C0x0%2C468x60&nras=1&correlator=6491021566217&frm=20&pv=1&ga_vid=357555393.1594285060&ga_sid=1600203340&ga_hid=1832514074&ga_fc=0&iag=0&icsg=147101231807&dssz=36&mdo=0&mso=0&u_tz=60&u_his=1&u_java=0&u_h=1080&u_w=1920&u_ah=1050&u_aw=1920&u_cd=24&u_nplug=3&u_nmime=4&adx=418&ady=1906&biw=1903&bih=930&scr_x=0&scr_y=0&oid=3&psts=AGkb-H-eMIOj-HyAUpYZjwa_z8FJADhLJ_jvCg9Jis68JbqcAqCne-86yhzdU3kA1A&pvsid=4377342552360492&pem=337&rx=0&eae=0&fc=896&brdim=0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C1920%2C0%2C1920%2C1050%2C1920%2C930&vis=1&rsz=%7C%7CleEbr%7C&abl=CS&pfx=0&fu=8192&bc=31&ifi=3&uci=a!3&btvi=2&fsb=1&xpc=lwZu4JaniI&p=https%3A//thenigerialawyer.com&dtd=7590

The crypto-coin investment environment in Nigeria has, thus, been devoid of extant regulation, despite a surge in peoples’ interest in the digital offerings.

According to the 2020 Global Crypto Adoption Index compiled by blockchain data analytics firm, Chainalysis, Nigeria ranked highly among other countries where cryptocurrency adoption was quite significant.

Nigeria was ranked alongside Ukraine, Russia, China, South Africa, Kenya, and the U.S. – all countries listed among the top-ranking countries by cryptocurrency adoption.

The capital market and investment regulator on Monday said digital assets provide alternative investment opportunities for the investing public and it therefore becomes essential to ensure that they “operate in a manner that is consistent with investor protection, the interest of the public, market integrity and transparency”.

Section 13 of the Investment and Securities Act, 2007 conferred powers on SEC as the apex regulator of the Nigerian capital market to regulate investments and securities business in Nigeria, it said.

In line with these powers, SEC said on Monday that it has adopted a three-pronged objective to regulate innovation, hinged on safety, market deepening and providing solution to problems.

“This will guide its strategy, its regulations and its interaction with innovators seeking legitimacy and relevance,” the statement said.

“Consequently, the SEC will regulate crypto-token or crypto-coin investments when the character of the investments qualifies as securities transactions.”

What to Regulate
SEC said that its position remains that virtual crypto assets are securities, unless proven otherwise. Hence, it said, the burden of proving that the crypto assets proposed to be offered are not securities and therefore not under the jurisdiction of the SEC, is placed on the issuer or sponsor of the said assets.

“Issuers or sponsors are expected to satisfy the burden of proving that the virtual assets do not constitute securities by making an initial assessment filing,” SEC said.

“However, where the finding of the Commission is that the virtual assets are indeed securities (not structured to be exclusively offered through crowdfunding portals or other exempt methods), then the issuer or sponsor must register the digital assets.

“The registration process for virtual assets will therefore involve a two-prong approach – an initial assessment filing to satisfy the burden of proof and a filing for registration proper, either made directly by the issuer or sponsor or where the burden of proof is not satisfied.”

Similarly, SEC said all Digital Assets Token Offering (DATOs), Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs), Security Token ICOs and other Blockchain-based offers of digital assets within Nigeria or by Nigerian issuers or sponsors or foreign issuers targeting Nigerian investors, shall be subject to the regulation of the Commission.

Existing digital assets offerings prior to the implementation of the Regulatory Guidelines will have three (3) months to either submit the initial assessment filing or documents for registration proper, as the case may be, it said.

The commission said those to be regulated include “any person, (individual or corporate) whose activities involve any aspect of Blockchain-related and virtual digital asset services, must be registered by the Commission and as such, will be subject to the regulatory guidelines.” Such services include, but are not limited to, reception, transmission and execution of orders on behalf of other persons, dealers on own account, portfolio management, investment advice, custodian or nominee services.

Others are issuers or sponsors (start-ups or existing corporations) of virtual digital assets who shall be guided by the commission’s regulation.

The commission said it may require foreign or non-residential issuers or sponsors to establish a branch office within Nigeria but foreign issuers or sponsors will be recognised by the commission where a reciprocal agreement exists between Nigeria and the country of the foreign issuer or sponsor.

“A recognition status will also be accorded, where the country of the foreign issuer or sponsor is a member of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO),” it said.

The commission added that “Crypto Asset” means a digital representation of value that can be digitally traded and functions as “(1) a medium of exchange; and/or (2) a unit of account; and/or (3)a store of value, but does not have legal tender status in any jurisdiction. A Crypto Asset is – neither issued nor guaranteed by any jurisdiction, and fulfils the above functions only by agreement within the community of users of the Crypto Asset; and Distinguished from Fiat Currency and E-money.”

Data Protection Bill: NIMC Boss Tasks Stakeholders on Privacy Rights, Security of Nigerians

0

By Dele Ogbodo

The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the National Identity Management Commission (NIMC), Engr. Aliyu Aziz, on Tuesday tasked Public Officers, Multinational Companies (MNCs),

Data Aggregators, Controllers and stakeholders in the emerging subsector to take into cognizance the overarching imperative of the privacy rights and security of Nigerians as it concerns the data protection bill.

Engr. Aziz, who spoke at broader spectrum of stakeholder review and validation workshop on the ongoing draft data protection bill for Nigeria, in Abuja, said inputs to the bill must meet the country’s broader and holistic legal enabling environment, multi sectoral needs of the country and beyond with regards to user privacy, security, protection, access and use of data including the designation of an independent data protection authority.

The NIMC boss however acknowledged that a robust legal and regulatory framework underpinning an ID system is a critical enabler for the success of a national data protection bill.

According to him, this is fundamental to the entire ID project of Nigeria’s ID project considered as one of the most crucial legal and regulatory frameworks for promoting trust in the foundational ID System with regards to the protection of privacy and personal data.

While underscoring the essence of the workshop, he said: “We all know that stakeholder consultation and involvement is critical to ensuring effective reforms and smoother implementation of any legislation and I want to thank each and every one of you for making out time to be part of this forum and also participate in this very important process where all ID stakeholders have the opportunity to discuss, share insights, provide guidance and agree a common vision towards the finalization of the draft data protection bill.

“It is with the above background in mind that I want to also inform all the ID stakeholders and participants here that the enactment of the data protection legislation is a condition towards the credit and financing arrangement for the accelerated Digital ID Development project funded by the World Bank, AFD and European Investment Bank, which are development partners.”

He added: “As stakeholders in the ID ecosystem, your constructive feedback and inputs would be valuable towards enriching and strengthening the bill and most importantly ensuring inclusion in the decision-making process of the bill drafting and enactment.”

While tasking the experts, he said: “The task before us is to ensure that the draft bill supports a broader and holistic legal enabling environment and meets multi sectoral needs of our country and beyond with regards to user privacy, security, protection, access and use of data including the designation of an independent data protection authority.”

In his remark, the Permanent Secretary, Political and Economic Affairs, Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF) Mr. Andrew David Adejo, said federal government has in the last few years demonstrated interest towards reforming the identity landscape in the country, especially as it concerns privacy rights and data protection.

Adejo, said the workshop organized by NIMC, signposts a milestone in Nigeria’s our quest to instituting the necessary safeguards that will protect its citizens’ personal data adding that this becomes more pertinent in this growing age of information technology and its associated cyber-crimes.

He said: “One of the critical components of the digital identification for development (ID4D) Project is to strengthen the legal and institutional framework as it concerns digital identity in Nigeria.

“As expected in any modern society, in order to adequately control the capture, storage and utilization of data and to protect us from abuses, it is essential to have a data protection law which can regulate and shape the activities of individuals, organizations and the government in matters related to the processing of personal information.”

According to him, each time an individual requests for a service, purchases a product on the internet through a merchant’s website or platform, registers an email, accesses health care, pay taxes, or enter into any contract, that individual has to dispense with his or her personal information even without the individual’s consent, data and information about the individual is being generated, stored and processed by agencies and other organizations that individual may have interacted with, manually or through automated means.

“The only way citizens can have confidence in both government and corporate entities is through strong data privacy and data protection practices, with effective legislation to help minimize breaches and other forms of data exploitation.

“The future and the success of the local digital economy we are building will be determined by the belief in, or distrust, of our identity management system.” he said.

Citizen By Marriage Is Discriminatory and Against Nigerian Women.

0

Daily Law Tips (Tip 653) by Onyekachi Umah, Esq., LL.M, ACIArb(UK)

One of the requirements for “Citizenship by Registration” is a marriage to a Nigerian. This has fetched it the nickname; “Citizenship by Marriage”. Marriage between a Nigerian and a foreigner may beget a Nigerian citizenship for the foreigner, depending on the sex of the Nigerian being married. This work reveals the discriminatory nature of citizenship by registration (marriage) in Nigeria. 

The constitution of Nigeria is the greatest of all laws in Nigeria and it does not bow to any person, religion, group, culture, convention, logic or force. Nigerian citizenship is a constitutional matter and clearly provided for in Chapter 3 of the Constitution of Nigeria. The Chapter 3 has 8 sections dedicated to citizenship. There are enormous privileges and rights open to only citizens of Nigeria. Even some fundamental human rights in Nigeria are only exercisable by Nigerians alone, (like, the Right to Private and Family Life, the Right to Freedom of Movement, the Right to Freedom from Discrimination and the Right to Acquire and Own Immovable Property). Hence there are awesome reasons to become a citizen of the most populous black nation in the world. 

There are three ways of becoming a Nigerian citizen and they are; Citizenship by birth, Citizenship by registration and Citizenship by naturalization. By the way, Nigeria allows dual citizenship for its citizens, although dual citizenship has some restrictions, like only its citizens by birth that have dual citizenship and also citizens without dual citizenship, are allowed to hold elective positions in the legislative or executive arms in federal and state levels. There is room for renunciation of citizenship as well as deprivation of citizenship in Nigeria. Click to read my other works on Citizenship in Nigeria. 

Citizenship by registration is the means of becoming a citizen of Nigeria that is open to only 2 classes of persons. The persons are; any woman who is or has been married to a citizen of Nigeria and then, any person of full age and capacity that is born outside Nigeria and has a grandparent that is a Nigerian. Where any of the above mentioned persons applies to be registered as a citizen of Nigeria and the President of Nigeria is satisfied that the person has good character and clear intention to be domiciled in Nigeria and that the person has taken the Oath of Allegiance in the Constitution of the Nigeria, the person may be registered as citizen of Nigeria. 

Nigerians are allowed to marry themselves and foreigners. Same sex marriage is prohibited in Nigeria. One of the benefits of a union between a Nigerian and a foreigner is that the foreigner may become a citizen of Nigeria by registration (marriage). However, this is only applicable to foreign women that marry Nigerian men. The constitution of Nigeria, specifically limits citizenship by registration to any woman married to a citizen of Nigeria and by that, the constitution omits any man married to a Nigerian woman from being registered as a citizen. Hence, a foreign man that marries a Nigerian woman cannot gain Nigerian citizenship but a foreign woman that marries a Nigerian man will gain Nigerian citizenship. 

The Constitution of Nigeria frowns against discrimination of any Nigerian based on sex or other grounds (like, community, ethnic group, place of origin, religion or political opinion). It is a breach of fundamental human rights (specifically the Right to Freedom from Discrimination). The constitution has been the basis for many policies, laws, practices and even traditions that have been declared discriminatory and invalid by the courts, and at times with huge monetary damages (fines). One wonders what happens or will happen where the constitution itself is discriminatory, like in this case of citizenship by registration (marriage). 

By the discrimination enshrined in the constitution under citizenship by registration, the greater population of Nigerians (being women) are deprived from the constitutional rights that should come naturally to them and their spouses (foreign men/husbands). What Nigerian men and their foreign wives enjoy under the citizenship by registration (marriage) must be made open to Nigerian women and their foreign husbands. No sex is a better or higher Nigerian than the other. No sex should suffer for way and form they were created by God/nature.  

At this point, the constitution of Nigeria, being the hunter of the violators and perpetrators of discrimination in Nigeria, should be hunted via constitutional amendment over its discrimination in citizenship by registration. The Constitution is the work of man and expectedly can never be perfect, hence it has room for amendment. All well-meaning Nigerians should support equality of men and women in the constitution of Nigeria and in the affairs of Nigeria, at all times. 

My authorities are:

  1. Sections 1, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 37, 41, 42, 43, 66(1), 107 (1), 137 (1), 142(2), 182 (1), 187(2), 318 and 319 of the Constitution of Nigeria, 1999.
  2. The judgment of the Court of Appeal (on dual citizenship and qualification for elections) in the case of Dr. Willie Ogebide v. Mr. Arigbe Osula (2004) 12 NWLR Part 886 page 138 paras C-E.
  3. The judgment of the Court of Appeal (on dual citizenship and qualification for elections) in the case of LABOUR PARTY & ORS v. ISHOLA & ORS (2014) LPELR-24386(CA)
  4. Canada: Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, “Nigeria: Information on whether a non-Nigerian woman married to a Nigerian man can obtain Nigerian citizenship based on their marriage if the marriage is common law, including requirements and procedures (2015-January 2017)” (Refworld UNHCR, 26 January 2017) <https://www.refworld.org/docid/5a82f8244.html> accessed 7 September 2020.
  5. Wikimedia Foundation Inc, “Nigerian Nationality Law” (Wikipedia, 10 June 2020) <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigerian_nationality_law> accessed 7 September 2020. 

#SabiLaw

#DailyLawTips

#SabiBusinessLaw

#SabiElectionLaws

#SabiHumanRights

#SabiLawOnBeatFm

#SabiLawLectureSeries

#CriminalJusticeMonday

#SabiLawVideoChallenge

Speak with the writer, ask questions or make inquiries on this topic or any other via [email protected] or [email protected] or +2348037665878. To receive our free Daily Law Tips, follow our Facebook Page:@LearnNigerianLaws, Instagram:

@LearnNigerianLaws and Twitter: @LearnNigeriaLaw

Please share this publication for free till it gets to those that need it most. Save a Nigerian today! NOTE: Sharing, modifying or publishing this publication without giving credit to Onyekachi Umah, Esq. and “LearnNigerianLaws.com” is a criminal breach of copyright and will be prosecuted.

This publication is the writer’s view not a legal advice and does not create any form of relationship. You may reach the writer for more information.

Powered by www.LearnNigerianLaws.com {A Free Law Awareness Program of Sabi Law Foundation, supported by the law firm of Bezaleel Chambers International (BCI).}

Abuja-Kaduna train: NRC claims attack was hoodlums’ stoning not bandits’ bullets

130

The Nigerian Railway Corporation (NRC) says bandits did not attack Abuja-Kaduna train KA4 between Asham and Kubwa on Monday afternoon.

The Managing Director, Fidet Okhiria, said this in a statement on Tuesday.

He claimed that hoodlums usually throw heavy stones at the moving train along Abuja-Kaduna route.

“There was no bandit attack on the train, it’s just a rumour. There will have been bullet all over the train if it was the case. It was hoodlums who threw stones at the train.”

He stated that the attack was because the Police earlier caught one suspect.

The MD said more hoodlums came out to attack the train in protest against the arrest made in the afternoon.

“NRC has, however, spoken to security agencies to help us prevent such future occurrences and intervene in the matter, so they will know how best to deal with the situation’” Okhiria noted.

He urged members of the public using the trains not to panic.INTERESTING FOR YOU

President Buhari’s Praise Singer Receives N57m To Release New Song For Him

0

resident Muhammadu Buhari’s praise singer, Dauda Kahutu popularly known as Rarara, has received not less than N57m to release a new song in favour of the President.

Kahutu got the funds less than 48 hours after asking for money to release a song in favour of the President.

He also said financing the new song will show that there was no suffering and that Buhari’s government was doing well. 

In the video, the praise singer said, “I will sing a new song in praise of Buhari until Northerners paid for it.” 

He went on to read out an account number into which donations will be sent

Less than 48 hours after releasing the video, SaharaReporters gathered that the praise singer had raised a huge sum running into millions of naira.

Some ardent supporters of the President made donations and shared evidence of payment on social media.

Some wealthy Northerners and Buhari’s supporters also donated huge sums for the release of the song, sources disclosed.

“The praise singer had earlier said the claim of suffering in Nigeria is a lie spread by what he referred to as useless people.

“He got N57m in two days with 48 Northerners donating N13.7m.

“The singer, in recent days, has been giving out cars as gifts, a part of what he described as a sign that Nigerians are doing well under Buhari,” a source aware of the song project told SaharaReporters.

Rarara had released songs for some governors in the All Progressives Congress including Nasir El-Rufai of Kaduna, Mohammed Badaru of Jigawa and Abdullahi Ganduje of Kano.

Recall that angry youth in Katsina State attacked the musician while he was shooting a video for the President.

According to Katsina Post, the youth attacked the musician at the Central Market in Katsina, the state capital, as he was shooting a video of his latest song “Jahata Ce”.

The aggrieved youth upon seeing the singer, started shouting and condemning him in Hausa language.

(Opinion) Though no fan of OBJ, Soyinka in scathing article agrees with him over Buhari

0

BETWEEN ‘DIVIDERS-IN-CHIEF’ and DIVIDERS-IN-LAW

By Wole Soyinka

I am notoriously no fan of Olusegun Obasanjo, General, twice former president and co-architect with other past leaders of the crumbling edifice that is still generously called Nigeria. I have no reasons to change my stance on his record. Nonetheless, I embrace the responsibility of calling attention to any accurate reading of this nation from whatever source, as a contraption teetering on the very edge of total collapse. We are close to extinction as a viable comity of peoples, supposedly bound together under an equitable set of protocols of co-habitation, capable of producing its own means of existence, and devoid of a culture of sectarian privilege and will to dominate.

On Africa Day, May 2019, organised by the Union Bank of Africa, I similarly seized an opening to direct the attention of this government to warnings by the Otta farmer over the self-destruct turn that the nation had taken, urged the wisdom of heeding the message, even while remaining chary of the messenger. That advice appears to have fallen on deaf ears. In place of reasoned response and openness to some serious dialogue, what this nation has been obliged to endure has been insolent distractions from garrulous and coarsened functionaries, apologists and sectarian opportunists.

The nation is divided as never before, and this ripping division has taken place under the policies and conduct of none other than President Buhari – does that claim belong in the realms of speculation? Does anyone deny that it was this president who went to sleep while communities were consistently ravaged by cattle marauders, were raped and displaced in their thousands and turned into beggars all over the landscape? Was it a different president who, on being finally persuaded to visit a scene of carnage, had nothing more authoritative to offer than to advice the traumatised victims to learn to live peacefully with their violators? And what happened to the Police Chief who had defied orders from his Commander-in-Chief to relocate fully to the trouble spot – he came, saw, and bolted, leaving the ‘natives’ to their own devices. Any disciplinary action taken against ‘countryman’? Was it a spokesman for some ghost president who chortled in those early, yet controllable stages of now systematised mayhem, gleefully dismissed the mass burial of victims in Benue State as a “staged show” for international entertainment? Did the other half of the presidential megaphone system not follow up – or was it, precede? – with the wisdom that they, the brutalized citizenry, should learn to bow under the yoke and negotiate, since “only the living” can enjoy the dividends of legal rights?

To reel off any achievements of a government – genuine or fantasised, trivial or monumental – is thus to dodge the issue, to ignore the real core concerns. No government, however inept, fails to record some form of achievement – this was why it were elected, and it takes real genius to succeed in spending four years actually doing nothing. What it fails to do, or what it does wrongly, deceitfully or prejudicially is what concerns the citizenry. Across this nation, there is profound distrust, indeed abandonment of hope in this government as one that is genuinely committed to the survival of the nation as one, or indeed understands the minimal requirements for positioning it as a modern, functional space of productive occupancy. Donald Trump is not without a governance pass mark here or there – indeed, he has been touted for the Nobel Peace prize in some quarters,  backed, predictably, by the quota Nigerian columnist – yet who dares deny, outside Republican diehard circles – that the great United States of American is brutally divided, and is even unraveling under the Trumpian phenomenon!  

Back to our own yaws however: Are pensioners still considered human, deserving the rewards of labour without further labour?  Many collapse from that extended labour of recovering routine entitlements. Even routine access to that basic human requirement – food – is now under question, as farmers are chased off their farms in large numbers. Instead of timely action – urged stridently by beleaguered governors and of course by ‘professional agitators’ — appeasement of the violent food saboteurs was the preferred route to food security – operating under fancy names like RUGA. So how do you persuade graduates and young school leavers to try their hands at farming instead of flooding urban centres looking for non-existent white-collar positions? To get killed and dismembered? And what is the score within those much-coveted urban precincts? Lop-sided appointments to crucial positions in Civil Service and parastatals!  Consider the prime economic cash cow – petroleum – exposed a few months ago as a reeking cesspit of nepotism. Who is the Minister of Petroleum under whose watch such an unprecedented contempt for geographical parity – uncontroverted till today —  became entrenched? That happens to be none other than the nation’s president – and he did make a show of astonishment at the gross disparities, promised to subject the anomaly to immediate enquiry. May one ask what action has been taken to rectify that presumably “nation-unifying” compilation?  It all casts a long, unedifying shadow backwards to those days of agitation by Tai Solarin and the mercuric engineer, Awojobi when the same Buhari took forceful charge of that ministry, promised to get to the root of the flying charges – anyone still recall the saga of the missing millions?  He made a beeline for the home of a prominent political leader and carted away loads of files in his illegal possession. In vain the nation awaited enlightenment – Nothing!

National divisiveness? Just where does culpability lie?  Does centralist usurpation divide or bind? The answer is obvious in daily effects. We have even heard the charge laid at the feet of governors. When the constitutive units of this nation take steps to rescue themselves into the ‘unifying’ quagmire into which they have been plunged by a creaking, clearly unworkable centralised system, guess who squawk, gnash their teeth and threaten to call down thunder even where such remedies are backed by constitutional provisions! Alas, the dare of ignorance!  And after being confronted by the legitimate right of states to at least salvage their existence and protect their citizens, guess who trundles out constrictive parameters, and attempts to dictate to governors how such state prerogatives should be exercised! Come under the umbrella of a failed Inspectorate Usurper – ordered the Garbled megaphone. Just on whose authority?

We do know – let this be stated for the umpteenth time! – that the rains did not just begin to beat us yesterday in this nation. We know when the clouds began to gather, where the deluge began and turned to severe pounding. We can pinpoint the first trickle of the torrent of appeasement, of illegal extortions and concessions. Past leaders will not be permitted to forget or gloss over own self-centred interests and nation corrosive lapses that brought us to this parlous present. But we do endure in this here and now, in the immediacy of current governance, so let no uppity flunkey attempt to divert attention from current realities, realities that now clearly pronounce this nation of once promising prospects a basket case of abject penury and insecurity, where hordes of trained minds and sturdy limbs roam the streets as beggars, as haphazard vendors of the products of other peoples, other lands!

Inequity reigns, and solutions are trivialised. Again and again voices are raised to urge the dismantling of a crude, militarised centralist contraption – repeatedly exposed in illegalities —  and substitute a more efficient governance system, decentralised, providing broader access to opportunities. All such efforts are turned into opportunities for legislative junketing and budget padding. Legislators watch with indifference in this day of human advance, as individuals are sentenced to hang for expressing their views on the relative apprehension of religious avatars, not a squeak emerge from such lawgivers. Pedophiles and cross-border sex traffickers are honoured in the act, granted immunity on cooked-up alibis of religion. Is this nation a theocracy?  Nigeria is a suppurating slaughter slab, and it boggles the mind that supposedly wise and lettered men, sheltering under any religious mandate, would go into a solemn huddle to ‘legitimately’ augment the toll of mindless killings that now plague the land. 

Presumably, the ongoing ‘national security’ persecution of Obadiah Mailafia is a sign of national unity? I invite our marionettes to read deeply into history.  Oh, excuse me, history has been banned from learning structures, so look not for history books! However, straightforward, first-hand testimonies abound, exposing structural flaws, deceits and conspiracies against this presumptive national edifice. They are perpetrated by highly placed servants of the state, some of whom have since risen to even higher national positions. I draw attention, for instance, to detailed revelations of plots against the nation, plots that resonate in the present. Such is the two-year old interview of a former ambassador to the Sudan, Bola Dada – The Punch Newspapers.  Archives remain ever obliging. They avail us vivid material to decide whether or not a sinister script is being acted out today with copious libations from Nigerian blood.

I think, in public interest, The Punch should re-run that interview, most especially in view of recent claims by a columnist in The Nation – Femi Abbas Sept. 4 — regarding how and by whom Nigeria was corralled into the OIC. When you abolish History in institutions, you open the gates wide for rampaging revisionism while the same gates are shut against a grasp, however tenuous, of why, for instance, a Mailafia becomes a target of serial interrogations and harassment,  rather than those boldly named in his revelations. Is it he who constitutes a danger to the nation, or the indicted fanatics of unlimited impunity and callous disregard for humanity? Why the ostentatious pretence of investigative zeal? The man has told you where to look. Well, look in that direction and report back to us! In the meantime however, ensure that he meets with no accident!

Still on security: any tear that is shed for the arch-bandit and multiple murderer Akwaza, known as Gana, is an obscenity.  However, tears of trepidation are falling fast and furious over the conduct of an army that eliminates a captive in cold blood, side-tracking the rationality of professional investigations and legitimate pursuit of felons and other enemies of society. The issue here is not one of the appropriateness of a policy of Amnesty – that constitutes a larger debate in its place. The issue here – and a critical one —  is that a Wanted Man, on his way to surrender, has been killed in cold blood. I read yesterday that the Army has followed this up with a demand for the bounty earlier placed by the Benue State governor on the head of the WANTED man. However, all reports so far indicate that he was on his way to surrender? And so, is this bounty demand a joke? An end then to such gallows humour! And certainly not now, not while the nation is freshly reeling from the latest horror of the targeting of unarmed Road Safety officials, gunned down in cold blood in their commuter bus, and the mass kidnapping of survivors.  Shall we presume that the surviving casualties of routine duty rosters are also nation-dividers if they scream out for protection and deplore a breakdown in the entire security architecture of the nation?  

We must however concede one remedial initiative to this government. Perhaps it was a belated awareness that the roof of the national edifice was on fire that instigated the effort to appropriate all available water resources in the nation — a desperate move to put out the flames with one hefty splash! Presumably, even the rains that fall on earth will belong to the Exclusive List?  We shall have to learn to gather such rain before it strikes the earth, or else queue for a licence to tap it later for domestic use. Get ready to pay stiff fines when we get rain soaked for lack of public transportation. Distractions upon distractions, but dangerous distractions! Provocative moves that deeply erode any lingering faith in the even-handed claims of governance, of respect for the rights of independent peoples that were brought together to form a nation, and the justice of equality of access to the land’s resources.  But the fault is not one-sided. Let governors also wake up to their constitutional rights and duties. There are vast areas of those rights that have been trampled upon, usurped for far too long. Forget legislative jamborees of constitution reviews – we have had our fill of them – all the files are gathering dust. It is time for Reparations! Dust up those files and head for the courts. Prepare for name-calling, just as long as such names embody – Dividers-in-law!

Only then shall we uncover who are the real Dividers-in-Chief? If individual voices rankle, then perhaps it is time to convoke a Nation Survival Conference. Let all sections and group interests place their cards on the table and starkly articulate what we all know and endure on a daily basis, and proffer solutions, debate moves towards a collective – rational and sincere — undertaking of nation formation. The ongoing governance posture of aggressive evasion spells only one end: collective suicide.

▪︎ Soyinka, Nobel laureate for Literature sent by email from, A.R.I. Idi-Aba, Abeokuta, Ogun State.

Magistrate Court remands Artists for recording obscene video in Osun-Osogbo shrine

0

By Richard Akintade, Osogbo.An Osun Magistrate court sitting in Osogbo, the state capital, on Monday, ordered the remand of six accused persons for allegedly recording obscene publication at Osun-Osogbo shrine.The accused are Tobiloba Isaac Jolaoso (27), Ladiva Aije (22), Juliet Semion (24), Ahmed Olasunkanmi (23), Adeniran Eritosin (29), and Tunde Jimoh (27).Police prosecutor, Idoko John, told the court that the accused persons committed the offence on or about July 25, 2020 at (about) 12:30pm at Osun-Osogbo shrine, Osogbo.Idoko alleged that the accused persons did act a drama or film, which appeared on the face of it to bear pornographic picture of young girls who were half dressed and thereafter published or sent for public consumption.He further said that the accused persons did conspire among themselves to act at the Osun-Osogbo traditional and religious ground and  commit a misdemeanor to wit: insult to religion.He disclosed that the accused persons unlawfully damaged  window louvers of the police station.Prosecutor stated that the offence committed by the accused persons was contrary to and punishable under 516,233,517,451 Cap 34 Vol ll Law of Osun state 2002.The six accused persons pleaded not guilty to the allegations preferred against them.One of the accused told the court that they went to the shrine for excursion and they only took pictures.Defence Counsel, Tunbosun Oladipupo, applied for the bail of the  accused persons  in most liberal terms, saying that the alleged offences were bailable. But the prosecutor opposed the bail application by the defence counsel on the grounds that the scene of the crime was an international worship ground, claming that the act would  tarnish the image of the religion.He said further that the accused persons were not residents of Osogbo and their location was not known by the  police and one of them was a Cameroonian.He said if they were granted bail they were likely to cause a breach of peace and order of the state and  they could commit similar offence.In his ruling, Magistrate Isola Omisade ordered the remand of the six accused persons in Ilesa correctional center.He adjourned the matter till September 17, 2020 for ruling on bail.

Nigerian Army constructs bridge, hospital for communities in Osun

0

The Nigerian Army has constructed a bridge and hospital for some communities in Osun State.Speaking during the inauguration of two projects, the Chief of Army Staff, Lieutenant General Tukur Yusuf Buratai, said he was indeed very glad to be part of the historic inauguration of the two projects.He said the projects included a Bailey bridge over the famous Osun River that links Ede, Owu Kuta and Ikoyi communities and a hospital at Asamu town, all constructed by the Nigerian Army were parts of effort to enhance the well being of Nigerians and in line with the Army’s improved Civil-Military relations activities, which are akin to Corporate Social Responsibility in the corporate world.

One of the projects, a bailey bridge constructed across Osun River, by the Nigerian Army Engineers, was named “TY Buratai Bailey Bridge” to honour the Chief of Army Staff.The COAS further stated that the bridge had wiped the tears of the people of Ede, Owu Kuta and Ikoyi as they had been battling for such project for over a hundred years without success.

He added that the socio-economic benefits of the bridge to the communities were most unprecedented.The other project, was a state of the art hospital for Asamu community in Osun State.In addition, a foundation was also laid for befitting staff quarters for the hospital at the town.The COAS said the large turnout of illustrious sons and daughters of the affected communities from various parts of the country, “speaks volumes about the importance of the projects to the befitting communities.“Personally, I must say that I have also enjoyed the warm hospitality of Oba Ahmed Adekunle Oyelude Makama Tegbosun III (Olowu of Kuta), the government and good people of Osun State.“It was also an opportunity for me to meet senior military officers both serving and retired that I haven’t seen for a long time and good friends such as Alhaji Ismail Omipidan, the CPS to the Governor, State of Osun, Mrs. Kudirat Ibrahim, Sector Commander of RS11.1, of the Federal Road Safety Corps, Osun State and the Honourable Commissioner for Information  and Orientation State of Osun,  the immediate past President of Nigerian Guild of Editors, Mrs Funke Egbemode, among other wonderful people,” he said.

EFCC re-arraigns “Mama Boko Haram”, others for fresh N97.4 million fraud

0

and Financial Crimes Commission, (EFCC), Maiduguri zonal office has re-arraigned Aisha Alkali Wakil, popularly known as “Mama Boko Haram” before Justice Aisha Kumaliya of the Borno State High Court, Maiduguri on three fresh offences of fraud to the tune of N97,400,000.00.Each of the offences contained two -count charges, making a cumulative six-count charges before the court.Tahiru Alhaji Saidu Daura and Prince Lawal Shoyode

were re-arraigned with Wakil.A count in the first offence reads: “That you, Tahiru Saidu Daura, Aisha Alkali Wakil and Prince Lawal Shoyode, whilst being programme manager, chief executive officer and country director respectively of Complete Care and Aid Foundation (a non-governmental organisation), sometime in the year 2018 at Maiduguri, Borno State, within the jurisdiction of this honorable court with intent to defraud, induced one Saleh Ahmed Said of Shuad General Enterprises Ltd. to deliver to you 3,000 (Three Thousand) bags of beans worth N71,400,000, under the false pretence of executing a contract for the supply of same, which you made the said Saleh Ahmed Said to believe that you had the capacity to pay the entire contract sum upon execution, which you knew to be false and you thereby committed an offence, contrary to and punishable under Sections 1(1) (b) and 1(3) of the Advance Fee Fraud and other Fraud- Related Offences Act, 2006 respectively.”A count in the second offence reads: “That you, Aisha Alkali Wakil, Tahiru Alhaji Saudi Daura, Prince Lawal Shoyode, whilst being chief executive officer, programme manager and country director, respectively of Complete Care and Aid Foundation (a non-governmental organization) and Saidu Mukhtar (at large) sometime in July, 2018 at Maiduguri, Borno State, within the jurisdiction of this honourable court with intent to defraud, obtained the sum of N11,000,000.00 from one Muhammed Ambare of Mohammed Ambare Ventures under the false pretence of executing a purported contract of supply, installation and servicing of two units of x-ray machine Model 1800, which you knew to be false and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 1(1) (b) of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act, 2006 and punishable under Section 1(3) of the same Act.”A count in the third offence reads: “That you, Aisha Alkali Wakil, Tahiru Alhaji Saudi Daura, Prince Lawal Shoyode, whilst being chief executive officer, programme manager and country director, respectively of Complete Care and Aid Foundation (a non-governmental organization) and Saidu Mukhtar (at large) sometime in November, 2018 at Maiduguri, Borno State, within the jurisdiction of this honourable court with intent to defraud, obtained the sum of N15,000,000.00, from one Hon. Bukar Kachalla of Hammiza Global Resources Limited under the false pretence of executing a purported contract of supply of three units of chemistry analyzer solar energy brand Model 1800 (UK Version), which you knew to be false and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 1 (1) (b) of the Advance Fee Fraud and other Fraud Related Offences Act, 2006 and punishable under Section 1(3) of the same Act.”They pleaded not guilty to the charges, prompting prosecution counsel, Benjamin Manji and Khalid Sanusi, to ask for a trial date and prayed that the defendants be remanded in the custody of Nigerian Correctional Service (NCS).Justice Kumaliya adjourned the matter till October 5, 6, 8, 9, 12 and 13, 2020 for trial and ordered that the defendants be remanded in the custody of the NCS.