Home Blog Page 88

Justice or Jaded Hope? DSS nabs Owo church attack suspect as fresh abductions rock Ondo

Nearly four years after gunmen stormed St. Francis Catholic Church and massacred worshippers in one of Nigeria’s deadliest church attacks, operatives of the Department of State Services (DSS) say they have arrested a sixth suspect linked to the atrocity.

But as authorities celebrate what they describe as a “significant milestone,” fresh violence has once again rattled Ondo State. Gunmen have abducted six worshippers from a Celestial Church in Uso, along the Owo–Akure Expressway.

For many residents, the haunting question lingers: What use is justice years later if insecurity still ravages the state and worshippers remain unprotected?

The Long Hunt for a Fugitive

The June 5, 2022 attack on St. Francis Catholic Church left more than 40 people dead and over 140 injured, sending shockwaves across Nigeria and beyond.

Five suspects—Idris Omeiza (25), Al Qasim Idris (20), Jamiu Abdulmalik (26), Abdulhaleem Idris (25), and Momoh Otuho Abubakar (47)—are already standing trial for terrorism-related offences.

For nearly four years, however, a sixth suspect allegedly evaded capture.

Security sources say DSS operatives finally tracked down Sani Yusuf in Iguosa community, along Powerline in Ovia North Local Government Area of Edo State. According to security analyst Zagazola Makama, Yusuf is believed to be a high-profile commander of the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP).

Investigators allege he slipped into Kano after the Owo massacre before relocating quietly to Edo State.

Security sources claim Yusuf has confessed to participating in the planning and execution of the church attack. He is also alleged to have admitted involvement in the July 2022 Suleja military barracks attack, the Zuma Rock checkpoint assault that killed five soldiers, and multiple kidnapping operations in Kaduna State.

Officials describe the arrest as a breakthrough in dismantling ISWAP-linked networks operating in southern Nigeria.

Inside the Courtroom: How the Attack Was Planned

At the Federal High Court in Abuja, a senior DSS official testified in vivid detail about how the Owo attack was allegedly orchestrated.

The prosecution witness, identified as “SSI,” a Deputy Director in charge of Terrorism Investigation, told the court that the accused were members of an ISWAP-affiliated faction described as Al-Shabab.

According to the testimony, a planning meeting was allegedly held on May 30, 2022, at a secondary school in Ogaminana, Kogi State. The directive, the court heard, was explicit: attack the Catholic church in Owo on Sunday and kill the presiding priest.

Weapons, including five AK-47 rifles, magazines, ammunition, and explosive devices, were allegedly supplied ahead of the attack. On June 5, the assailants reportedly drove to Owo in a Volkswagen Golf, concealed their weapons in a sack, and opened fire inside and outside the sanctuary.

Justice Emeka Nwite admitted DSS investigation reports, autopsy findings, and photographic evidence into the court record.

For survivors and families of victims, the trial represents a slow march toward accountability.

But outside the courtroom, insecurity remains a lived reality.

Fresh Fear: Six Worshippers Abducted

In the early hours of February 25, 2026—around 12:50 a.m.—gunmen invaded a Celestial Church during a night service in Uso, Owo Local Government Area.

According to the Ondo State Police Command, six worshippers were abducted and taken to an unknown destination.

Police spokesperson DSP Abayomi Jimoh said security operatives, in collaboration with the Nigerian Army and local vigilante groups, launched a coordinated rescue effort. One victim has since been rescued, and a suspected informant has been arrested.

Operations to rescue the remaining abductees are ongoing.

Yet for many residents, the attack is chillingly symbolic: the same Owo axis that witnessed the 2022 massacre is once again in the headlines.

Milestone or Mirage?

Security analysts say the arrest of a high-ranking ISWAP operative is operationally significant. It demonstrates intelligence persistence and cross-state tracking capability.

But critics argue that security success cannot be measured solely by arrests years after tragedy.

Ondo, like many Nigerian states, continues to grapple with kidnappings, highway ambushes, and attacks on rural communities. Churches, once considered sanctuaries, are increasingly seen as vulnerable targets.

Residents question whether counterterrorism victories translate into everyday safety.

Justice for the dead, they say, must not eclipse protection for the living.

A State Still on Edge

The Owo massacre was meant to be a wake-up call, an inflexion point in Nigeria’s fight against terrorism spreading southward.

Four years later, a fugitive has been caught. A trial inches forward. Confessions are recorded.

But as gunmen continue to strike, Ondo residents are left confronting a sobering paradox:

If arrests come after bloodshed, who prevents the next attack?

Until that question is convincingly answered, every courtroom breakthrough risks feeling less like closure and more like a reminder of a crisis that refuses to end.

Pupils on the Floor, Politicians in N100m SUVs: The governance crisis behind a viral classroom in Akwa Ibom

A troubling video from a public primary school in Ibiaku Itam, Itu Local Government Area of Akwa Ibom State, has ignited outrage across social media — and reopened uncomfortable questions about governance priorities in one of Nigeria’s highest-earning states.

The footage from Primary School, Ibiaku Itam in Ikot Mbonde Community, shows a classroom stripped to its barest form. Only four functional dual desks are visible. Four pupils squeeze into spaces meant for two. Others sit on cracked concrete floors, hunched over exercise books. Some lie on their stomachs to write. A few perch on broken planks. Their teacher, without a table, balances on a stool.

Windows hang loosely from their frames. The roof sags. The floor is fractured.

It is a scene one might expect in a remote, conflict-ravaged outpost. Instead, this school sits within the orbit of Uyo, the state capital — in oil-rich Akwa Ibom.

Model Schools vs. The Forgotten Majority

According to the 2022 approved budget, Akwa Ibom has 1,164 public primary schools. The administration of Governor Umo Eno has embarked on constructing 31 “model” primary schools — one in each local government area. Some have been completed and boast modern structures and seating.

But once those 31 schools are removed from the equation, 1,133 remain. Many are in various states of neglect.

Primary School, Ibiaku Itam, education stakeholders say, is not an isolated case. It is symptomatic.

Budget documents reviewed show repeated allocations for classroom furniture — but little evidence of execution.

In the 2023 revised budget, N16 million was approved for dual desks and plastic tables and chairs for pupils. The Budget Performance Report covering January to September 2023 recorded no expenditure on those items.

In 2024, N12 million was again budgeted for 1,000 dual desks and 50 plastic tables/chairs. Between January and September 2024, expenditure again stood at zero.

No publicly available records clarify whether spending occurred in the final quarters of 2023 or 2024. Requests for clarification to the Commissioner for Education, Ubong Umoh, and the Chairman of the State Universal Basic Education Board (SUBEB), Anietie Etuk, have yet to yield detailed responses.

For 2025, allocations were fragmented across multiple line items, including N1.6 million for 1,000 dual desks and several million more for plastic chairs and tables. Yet the state has not published its 2025 Budget Performance Report.

The question lingers: were the desks ever bought?

Record Revenue, Questioned Priorities

In 2025, Akwa Ibom recorded its highest-ever revenue — N1.134 trillion — while total spending reached N1.330 trillion.

Among the most prominent expenditures was the donation of 10 luxury SUVs to former deputy governors and political party leaders. Each vehicle, according to the 2025 approved budget, costs N100 million, totalling N1 billion.

At the state’s own procurement benchmark — roughly N40,000 per pupil table/chair — that N1 billion could procure at least 25,000 seats.

Twenty-five thousand seats would not merely furnish a classroom; they could transform learning conditions across dozens of schools.

Instead, in Ibiaku Itam, children sit on the floor.

Civil society advocates say the optics are troubling.

“When children sit on bare floors to learn, it sends a powerful psychological message,” said Akanimo Sampson of Rebuilders Foundation. “It tells the child their comfort and dignity are not important.”

She added that in a system where luxury vehicles are routinely provided for political elites, the absence of basic classroom seating cannot credibly be blamed on lack of resources.

“It reflects a deeper governance failure — a misunderstanding of what truly drives development.”

Billions to Councils, Silence on Accountability

Primary education is also a constitutional responsibility of local governments under Nigeria’s 1999 Constitution. Itu Local Government Area received N4.62 billion in FAAC allocations between January and November 2025, excluding internally generated revenue.

Yet no local government in the state publishes its budget online, despite requirements under the Akwa Ibom State Fiscal Responsibility Law mandating transparency.

Efforts to obtain clarification from Itu council chairperson Ubong Nkutt were unsuccessful.

The silence reinforces a broader concern: public funds flow, but accountability lags.

Experts Warn of Lasting Damage

Idongesit Archibong, a professor of Early Childhood Education at the University of Uyo, described the situation as “inhuman.”

“For effective learning, method, environment and content must align,” he said. “If a child is uncomfortable, concentration drops. The demonstration method becomes difficult. Participation suffers. It is very bad to allow kids to sit on the floor in primary school.”

He posed a pointed question: Would public officials allow their own children to learn this way?

Education experts warn that discomfort is not merely an inconvenience; it shapes self-worth, motivation and long-term outcomes.

Learning, they argue, is cognitive, physical and emotional.

A Pattern of Neglect

This is not the first alarm bell.

In 2018, investigative reports detailed how corruption and poor budget implementation contributed to the near collapse of public education in the state. Infrastructure decayed. Teachers went unpaid. Students endured squalid conditions.

Years later, despite record revenues, the fundamentals appear unresolved.

Historic Neglect Mirrors Classroom Crisis

The pattern of neglect extends beyond classrooms.

The historic Amalgamation House in Ikot Abasi — where Lord Frederick Lugard signed the 1914 documents uniting Nigeria’s Northern and Southern Protectorates — now stands in visible decay. Wooden structures rot. Artefacts deteriorate. Surrounding colonial landmarks crumble.

The site, potentially a tourism and heritage hub, languishes unattended.

Critics see symbolism: a state rich in oil revenue, yet struggling to maintain both its history and its classrooms.

A Second Chance in 2026?

The 2026 budget shows increased allocations for school furniture and, for the first time, explicitly names beneficiary schools. Hundreds of dual desks are approved for select institutions across several local government areas.

Specificity marks progress.

But history tempers optimism. This is not the first time funds have been earmarked.

For pupils in Ibiaku Itam and hundreds of other schools, the issue is not allocation on paper — it is execution on the ground.

In a state that can afford N100 million SUVs, the image of children lying on concrete floors to learn may become the defining question of governance:

The question now is, what truly matters?

Watch the video below.

Trauma, Stolen Childhoods: Nearly 1,200 children recruited by armed groups in Nigeria’s North-East in 2024

Nearly 1,200 children were forcibly recruited by armed groups in northeastern Nigeria two years ago, a stark reminder that, despite years of reintegration programmes and global pledges, childhood in parts of the country remains perilously fragile.

At least 595 girls and 525 boys were enlisted in 2024 alone across conflict-affected communities in Borno State, Yobe State and Adamawa State, according to the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF).

“These are verified cases,” UNICEF Child Protection Manager Tarek Akkad said Wednesday in Maiduguri during the 2026 Red Hand Day commemoration. “Behind every number is a child whose education, safety and future were interrupted.”

The figures, drawn from the latest report of the UN Secretary-General on Children and Armed Conflict, expose a crisis that refuses to fade.

Childhood Interrupted

In the region scarred by more than a decade of insurgency, boys are often forced into combat or support roles, while girls are frequently subjected to forced labour, domestic servitude, and sexual exploitation.

The physical risks are immediate. The psychological damage can last a lifetime.

Experts warn that children recruited into armed groups often suffer severe trauma — post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety and deep social withdrawal. Many struggle with stigma when they return home. Others return carrying invisible wounds that can manifest in aggression, distrust and chronic instability.

When reintegration fails, the cycle can repeat.

“Recruitment is a persistent and deeply damaging violation,” Akkad said.

The Vicious Cycle

Humanitarian workers say the crisis is not only about lost childhoods, but also about the long-term destabilisation of entire communities.

Children denied education are more vulnerable to poverty and re-recruitment. Trauma left untreated can fuel cycles of violence. Communities overwhelmed by insecurity and overstretched protection systems struggle to absorb returning children.

The result is a fragile social fabric where today’s child soldier risks becoming tomorrow’s unemployed, stigmatised and psychologically scarred adult.

Globally, UNICEF estimates that roughly 250,000 children are currently involved in armed conflicts — a figure Akkad described as a “grim reminder” of the scale of the crisis.

In Nigeria’s North-East, despite hundreds benefiting from psychosocial care and education support, protection systems remain thinly stretched.

“There is an urgent need to strengthen prevention, ensure accountability for recruiters and fully implement handover protocols,” Akkad said, stressing that rescued children must be treated strictly as victims.

Red Hand Day’s Stark Symbol

The announcement came during Red Hand Day, observed annually on February 12, marking the adoption of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child, which prohibits the involvement of children in armed conflict.

The red handprint — the campaign’s symbol — represents a global demand: stop using children as weapons of war.

At the event in Maiduguri, some formerly recruited children shared brief testimonies. They spoke of fear, coercion and confusion — but also of gradual recovery through education and counselling.

Still, the numbers tell a sobering story.

After more than a decade of insurgency in northeastern Nigeria, recruitment has not ended. It has adapted.

And for nearly 1,200 children last year, the cost was their childhood.

Just In: FG challenges Ajudua’s bail at Supreme Court in $1.043million fraud trial

Nigeria’s federal government has filed a Notice of Appeal before the Supreme Court of challenging the decision of the Court of Appeal of Nigeria delivered on January 30, 2026, which granted bail to Lagos socialite Fred Ajudua.

The appeal arises from Charge No. ID/16C/2025 and Appeal No. CA/LAG/1319/2025, and the government is seeking to overturn the entire ruling of the Court of Appeal and restore the earlier decision of the trial court that denied bail and ordered that the Respondent remain in custody.

Ajudua, 65, is standing trial for alleged conspiracy, obtaining money under false pretences, forgery, and use of forged documents under Lagos State law. 

The allegations are linked to a $1.043 million advance-fee fraud, a case that dates back to the late 1990s and early 2000s. 

The case, which began in 2005 before Justice M. O. Obadina, has faced multiple delays, reportedly due to various legal tactics employed by the defendant.

He applied for bail on July 22, 2025, citing worsening health and submitted medical reports confirming chronic kidney disease and the need for further treatment. 

However, the trial court refused bail, ruling that the Supreme Court had already revoked his bail and that his medical condition did not justify releasing him, although the Court of Appeal later disagreed.

In its Notice of Appeal dated February 20, 2026 and filed on February 23, 2026, the government stated that it was dissatisfied with the ruling of the Court of Appeal and was appealing on multiple grounds. 

The government, through its counsel, argued that the Court of Appeal erred when it overruled its preliminary objection challenging the competence of Ajudua’s appeal and made findings that, according to the government, misrepresented the effect of an earlier Supreme Court judgment delivered on May 9, 2025. 

The Notice of Appeal was filed by counsel including S. K. Atteh, T. J. Banjo, and P. I. Ugama of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.

The Respondent, Ajudua, was listed through his counsel, Olalekan Ojo, SAN, and Allens Agbaka of Olalekan Ojo (SAN) & Co, Comfort Chambers, Ribadu Street, Ikoyi, Lagos.

The Court of Appeal had stated that it could not find any order in that Supreme Court judgment directing that Ajudua be detained pending the conclusion of his trial and also stated that counsel had been economical with the truth in presenting the Supreme Court’s findings. 

The government rejected this interpretation and maintained that the Supreme Court had clearly resolved the issue of bail.

The government relied heavily on a portion of the Supreme Court judgment delivered by Justice Chioma Egondu Nwosu–Iheme, which explained that the appeal had been determined on jurisdiction and that the issue of bail was inseparable from that appeal. 

The judgment described the issue of bail as being like a “Siamese twin” with the appeal and stated that both must die together once the appeal failed. 

According to the government, the meaning of those words was that the issue of bail had been conclusively determined and could not be revived or reconsidered by any lower court. 

The government argued that the Supreme Court’s decision to revoke bail and remit the case for speedy trial meant that Ajudua was to remain in custody and that no court below the Supreme Court had the authority to grant bail again.

“To severe the issue of bail from this appeal which failed woefully is tantamount to making a mockery or caricature of a very serious business,” the applicant’s lawyers argued. 

Govt Alleges Appeal Court Violated Supreme Court Orders

The government further argued that the Court of Appeal violated Sections 235 and 275(1) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, which establish the finality of Supreme Court decisions and bind lower courts to follow them. 

It stated that the enrolled order of the Supreme Court dated June 3, 2025, signed by Justice Uwani Musa Abba Aji, who presided over the panel, clearly directed that Ajudua be remanded in prison custody and that the trial should continue and be concluded within the shortest possible time. 

The government argued that this order was clear and unambiguous and that the Court of Appeal failed to implement and enforce it.

The government also argued that the Court of Appeal acted improperly by making pronouncements suggesting that the Supreme Court did not decide certain issues because it determined the appeal on jurisdiction. 

The government stated that by doing so, the Court of Appeal effectively reviewed and reinterpreted a Supreme Court decision, which it had no authority to do. It argued that the Court of Appeal lacked jurisdiction to review, overturn, or revisit any decision of the Supreme Court and that its actions amounted to sitting on appeal over the apex court.

“The Court of Appeal was wrong in law and its judgment violated the provisions of sections 275(1) and 235 of 1999 Constitution (as amended) by subsequent grant bail to the Respondent after the Supreme Court has revoked the bail, and held that the bail issue is dead and buried, and remitted the case to the trial court for speedy trial and determination,” the government lawyers said.

“This position is firmly rooted in the principles of judicial hierarchy, stare decisis, and the finality of the Supreme Court’s decisions, which the Court of Appeal and the trial Court are bound to follow.”

Govt Opposes Case Transfer, Questions Medical Grounds For Bail

Another issue raised by the government concerned the question of transferring the case to another judge for trial. 

The government stated that this issue had not been raised at the trial court and argued that raising it at the appellate level was improper. The government also argued that transferring the case to another judge would undermine the Supreme Court’s order for speedy trial and determination and would contradict the clear directive given by the apex court when it remitted the case.

The government also challenged the Court of Appeal’s reliance on medical grounds as justification for granting bail. It argued that the Court of Appeal wrongly treated a medical report dated November 19, 2025, as evidence of changed circumstances. 

The government stated that Ajudua had been diagnosed with kidney-related illness since 1987 and argued that this condition had been used repeatedly since 2005 as a reason to avoid trial. 

The government also alleged that a consultant, Dr. A. J. Adewumi, issued medical reports on November 19 and November 27, 2025, which contained the same content but were used for different purposes, including explaining Ajudua’s absence from court. The government argued that these reports did not constitute new or changed circumstances that justified granting bail.

“That the Hon Justices of the Court of Appeal failed to consider the fact that the Consultant that issued the Medical report Dr. A. J. Adewumi, FMCP had been manipulating the report as reflected in the report dated 19th November, 2025 when the Respondent was in Court for trial and the report dated 27th of November, 2025 by the same Consultant which was the report used as excuse for the Respondent not to be present in Court on 28th of November, 2025,” the applicant’s lawyers argued.

“The two reports contained the same content.”

The government further argued that the Court of Appeal failed to consider the effect of previous bail granted to Ajudua in another charge in 2014. 

According to the government, despite being granted bail in that earlier case, only one witness had been called, which demonstrated that granting bail would frustrate the Supreme Court’s directive for speedy trial. The government argued that granting bail would undermine the purpose of the Supreme Court’s order and delay the resolution of the case.

In its appeal, the government stated that the ruling of the Court of Appeal was unreasonable and could not be supported by the evidence or the enrolled orders of the Supreme Court. 

It asked the Supreme Court to allow the appeal, revoke the bail granted by the Court of Appeal on January 30, 2026, and restore the ruling of the trial court delivered on November 20, 2025, which denied bail. The government also requested any further orders that the Supreme Court may consider appropriate in the circumstance

Herdsmen Terrorism: US moves to block beef export from Nigeria to Ivory Coast, Ghana, South Africa, Senegal

A congressional panel of the United States (US) has recommended the blockage of beef export and other cattle-related products from Nigeria to countries including Ivory Coast, Ghana, and others, as part of measures aimed at addressing the alleged persecution of Christians and worsening insecurity in the country.

Congressman Riley M. Moore, working with members of the House Committees on Appropriations and Foreign Affairs, had presented a report at the White House detailing what he described as concrete steps to combat the persecution of Christians in Nigeria and counter extremist violence.

The report followed President Trump’s redesignation of Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC) on October 31, 2025.

The report, in its findings, claimed that Nigeria, after decades of persecution, “is the deadliest place in the world to be a Christian. Christians are subject to ongoing violent attacks from well-armed Fulani militias and terrorist groups, resulting in the death and murder of tens of thousands of Christians, including pastors and priests, the destruction of thousands of churches and schools, as well as kidnappings. Blasphemy laws in Nigeria’s northern states are used to silence speech and dissent, target Christians and minorities, and justify so-called “convictions” without due process.”

In its recommendations to the US President, the panel called for the “review and use points of leverage to compel Fulani herdsmen to disarm, including by blocking export of beef and other cattle-related products to countries like Ivory Coast, Ghana, South Africa, and Senegal.”

Among the recommendations are the establishment of a bilateral U.S.–Nigeria security agreement to protect vulnerable Christian communities and dismantle jihadist networks; withholding certain U.S. funds pending action by the Nigerian government to halt violence against Christians; imposing sanctions and visa restrictions on individuals and groups responsible for or complicit in religious persecution; providing technical support to address violence from armed Fulani militias; demanding the repeal of Sharia and Blasphemy laws; and working with international partners including France, Hungary and the United Kingdom.

Read the full report here.

As Frank Mba, Seven DIGs Retire: 10 facts about incoming IGP Tunji Disu

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has appointed Assistant Inspector General (AIG) of Police, Olatunji Disu, as Nigeria’s 23rd Inspector‑General of Police (IGP), following Kayode Egbetokun’s resignation.

However, with the appointment of AIG Disu as the new IGP, no fewer than eight Deputy Inspector General (DIG) of Police would have to leave the Force for Disu to become the substantive IGP. 

In a statement by Bayo Onanuga, the president’s special adviser on information and strategy, Tinubu received Egbetokun’s resignation earlier on Tuesday and expressed his profound appreciation for Egbetokun’s decades of distinguished service to the Nigeria Police Force and the nation. 

Confirming Disu’s appointment, the statement reads, “In view of the current security challenges confronting the nation and acting in accordance with extant laws and legal guidance, President Tinubu has approved the appointment of Assistant Inspector-General of Police Tunji Disu to serve as Acting Inspector-General of Police with immediate effect.

Tunji Disu, as he is generally known, is a career officer with more than three decades of service in the Nigeria Police Force.

Below are ten things to know about the newly appointed Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu.

  1. Tunji Disu was born on April 13, 1966, in Lagos Island, Lagos State. 
  2. Holds a bachelor’s degree in English Education from Lagos State University (LASU), plus two master’s degrees: Public Administration (Adekunle Ajasin University) and Criminology, Security & Legal Psychology (LASU).
  3. He joined the police on May 18, 1992, and has served severally as DPO in Ago Iwoye (Ogun State), Ikare (Ondo State), Owo (Ondo State), Elimbu, and Elelenwo in Rivers State
  4. AIG Disu served as Commissioner of Police in Abuja and previously in Rivers State, with multiple leadership roles, including DPO, SARS commander, and 2IC of CID.
  5. He was the former head of the Police Force’s Intelligence Response Team (IRT), a position previously held by Abba Kyari, and also served as Principal Staff Officer to Acting IGP Kayode Egbetokun.
  6. He completed advanced courses in small arms smuggling (Botswana), internet fraud (Cambridge, UK), forensic investigations, criminal intelligence, and strategic leadership.
  7. He led Lagos State RRS from 2015–2021, rebranding officers as “The Good Guys” and promoting community-focused, problem-solving policing.
  8. The new IGP is a member of the International Association of Chiefs of Police and several other global professional policing and forensic bodies.
  9. He served as contingent commander for Nigeria’s first African Union Mission in Sudan (AMIS) in 2005 and acted as Chief of Staff in Darfur.
  10. He has a third dan black belt and has won multiple national and international medals, including silver at the 2022 U.S. Open Judo Championship; former Chairman of Lagos State Judo Association and a patron of the Nigerian Police Judo Association.
  11. Under Disu’s command, RRS received “Best Anti-Crime Police Squad in West Africa” (2016), and he personally earned “Most Outstanding Anti-Crime Police Chief” in West and Central Africa (2019) and CRAN’s “Man of the Year” (2019).

 Below are the DIGs to be affected:

Frank Mba

Frank Mba began his policing career as an Inspector and steadily rose through the ranks. In 1999, he was promoted to Assistant Superintendent of Police, followed by Deputy Superintendent of Police in 2003.

He was promoted to Superintendent of Police (SP) in 2008, Chief Superintendent of Police in 2012, Assistant Commissioner of Police in 2014, Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP) in 2018, and Commissioner of Police in December 2020. In March 2023, he was decorated as an Assistant Inspector-General of Police.

He is a three-time National Spokesman of the Nigeria Police Force and has received the UN Medal for his service as a member of the Nigeria Police Contingent to the United Nations Mission in Liberia from 2006 to 2007

Mohammed Gumel

Mohammed Gumel assumed duty as the 4th Deputy Inspector-General of Police in charge of the Force Intelligence Department at the Force Headquarters in Abuja in late December 2025/early January 2026. He is a seasoned officer, known for community policing.

The Force Intelligence Department is the apex intelligence-gathering arm of the Nigeria Police Force. He formerly served as a Commissioner of Police and was notably recognized as the best Community Policing Advocate of the Year (2024). He holds the FIPMA (Fellow, Institute of Professional Managers and Administrators) and psc (Police Staff College) designations.

Adebola Hamzat

Adebola Hamzat currently serves as the Deputy Inspector-General of Police in charge of the Department of Logistics and Supply of the Nigeria Police Force. He was appointed and decorated as a Deputy Inspector-General of Police in March 2025.

ALSO READ: 10 things to know about newly appointed IGP, Tunji Disu

As the head of the Department of Logistics and Supply, he oversees the technical, administrative, and logistical needs of the entire Nigeria Police Force, including procurement, works, housing, and the Force Quarter-Master.

Previous Roles: Before his elevation to DIG, he served as the Assistant Inspector-General of Police in charge of Zone 16, Yenagoa (covering Bayelsa and Rivers States). He was also the Commissioner of Police for Oyo State and the former AIG in charge of the Counter Terrorism Unit. He is an indigene of Ifelodun L.G.A of Kwara State.

Yahaya Abubakar

Yahaya Abubakar is a senior Deputy Inspector-General of Police in the Nigeria Police Force who most recently served as the Head of the Department of Finance and Administration at Police Force Headquarters, Abuja. He was appointed to lead the Department of Finance and Administration, which oversees the financial management, budgeting, human resources, and administrative processes of the Force.

DIG Abubakar was appointed to the position following his promotion by the Police Service Commission in 2024, having previously served in senior roles such as Assistant Inspector-General and Zone Commander

Basil Idegwu

Basil Idegwu was appointed to lead the Department of Research and Planning at the Force Headquarters in Abuja as of March 2025. He is responsible for strategic planning, policy formulation, and enhancing the Force’s operational efficiency.

He holds a Ph.D. in Peace and Security Studies. Idegwu heads a key department focused on ensuring standards, uniformity, and modernisation in policing services.

Bzigu Kwazhi

Bzigu Kwazhi is a senior officer in the Nigeria Police Force, currently serving as the Deputy Inspector-General of Police in charge of the Department of Operations.

He is responsible for leading, coordinating, and implementing operational activities, crime prevention strategies, and maintaining law and order across Nigeria. As the head of the Department of Operations, he manages tactical operations, joint security operations (with the military), and policies for controlling incidents like riots, disasters, and elections.

In 2025, he has been actively involved in high-level security assessments, including leading operations to restore peace in Plateau State and Adamawa State. He is a seasoned officer with extensive field experience, having previously served as the Commissioner of Police in both Osun and Akwa Ibom State.

Idris Abubakar

Idris Abubakar was appointed into the Nigeria Police Force as a cadet ASP on 18/5/1992. He hails from Garko LGA of Kano State. He holds a B.Sc. in Education from Utman Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, and an M.Sc. in Education, in Psychology and a PhD in Psychology from the University of Abuja.

Adebowale William

Adebowale Williams is a senior Nigerian police officer serving at the rank of Deputy Inspector-General of Police in the Nigeria Police Force. He held/has held a key leadership role as the Head of the Department of Information and Communication Technology at the Force Headquarters in Abuja.

He was appointed to lead the Department of Information and Communication Technology within the NPF. This department is responsible for managing and advancing the Force’s technological infrastructure, systems, and digital tools to support modern policing.

Is public office too attractive in Africa?

By Olufunke Baruwa

Africa is richly endowed with land, minerals, oil, gas, arable soil, creative talent, and the youngest population in the world. Nigeria alone has an estimated 37 billion barrels of proven oil reserves, vast gas deposits, and a population exceeding 220 million people. Yet decade after decade, much of the continent remains trapped in fragile democracies, weak service delivery, and leadership cycles that look more like generational inheritance than electoral succession.

The haunting question we must confront is this: Is public office simply too attractive in Africa? And if so, why? Answering this requires uncomfortable honesty about incentives, institutions, history, and our own collective complicity. While the allure of political power is universal, its grip on many African states including Nigeria included has become dangerously enduring.

One of the most striking paradoxes of African governance is the persistence of leaders in power far beyond reasonable democratic expectations. Across the continent, constitutions have been amended, courts reshaped, and electoral systems weakened to extend or rig tenures. In Cameroon and Uganda, presidents have governed for decades. In Nigeria, the aborted third-term agenda of 2006 remains a powerful reminder that even constitutional democracies are not immune to tenure elongation temptations.

But why does this persistence happen? At its core, power in many African states is not primarily exercised for service; it is leveraged for protection, privilege, and patronage. Public office becomes less about stewardship and more about access to state contracts, budget allocations, oil blocks, security votes, and political immunity.

Nigeria illustrates this vividly. Despite earning hundreds of billions of dollars from oil since the 1970s, the country still struggles with unreliable electricity, decaying public schools, and underfunded hospitals. According to the National Bureau of Statistics, over 130 million Nigerians are classified as multidimensionally poor. Yet political office holders remain among the highest paid public officials globally when allowances and opaque benefits are factored in.

In such an environment, stepping down from office is not merely relinquishing power, it is forfeiting access to enormous economic advantage and, in some cases, losing protection from investigation. Power becomes both prize and shield.

The Elusive Democratic Dividend

Nigeria has conducted uninterrupted civilian elections since 1999. Ballots are cast, results declared, and governments sworn in. Yet for millions, democracy has not translated into tangible improvement in daily life.

Youth unemployment and underemployment remain high. Inflation continues to erode incomes. Public universities face recurrent strikes. Hospitals lack equipment. Infrastructure deficits persist. This is the absence of the democratic dividend—the concrete benefits citizens expect from governance.

Why does this happen? First, institutions remain weak or compromised. Nigeria’s electoral body, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), has made technological improvements, yet elections are still marred by logistical failures, vote-buying, and litigation. The judiciary is overburdened and occasionally accused of inconsistency in politically sensitive rulings. Legislative oversight often appears timid in the face of executive dominance. Without robust institutions, democracy becomes ritualistic—periodic voting without sustained accountability.

Second, political survival depends more on loyalty than competence. Elections are frequently shaped by patronage networks, ethnic alignments, religious rhetoric, and financial inducements rather than policy debates. Once elected, leaders prioritize maintaining coalitions that keep them in power. Budget allocations may serve political calculus more than national development.

Third, meaningful alternatives remain constrained. Opposition parties are often fragmented or weakened by defections. Civil society faces regulatory and financial pressures. Independent media operate under economic strain and political intimidation. The space for transformative political competition narrows.

The result is citizen frustration. Movements such as #EndSARS in 2020 exposed widespread anger over police brutality and governance failures. More recently, #EndBadGovernance and #OccupyNASS protests have voiced economic grievances and demands for accountability. Yet protests, while powerful, rarely translate into structural reform without institutional anchoring and sustained political organization.

The consequences are severe: declining public trust, rising emigration, and growing cynicism among young people who increasingly see politics as a closed club of elites. Nigeria loses thousands of skilled professionals annually to the “Japa” wave—not merely for economic reasons, but because of a crisis of governance confidence.

Across Africa, similar patterns persist. The African Development Bank has repeatedly warned that youth unemployment poses a threat to stability. Governance failures more than resource scarcity drive this crisis.

Political Dynasties and the Power to Perpetuate Self

Another troubling trend is the normalization of political dynasties. Across Africa, leadership has, in several cases, evolved into family inheritance—from Togo’s Gnassingbé family to Congo’s Sassou-Nguesso dynasty and Angola’s Dos Santos lineage.

Nigeria, though formally democratic, is not insulated from dynastic politics. Political families dominate party structures at federal and state levels. Children of former governors, senators, and presidents frequently occupy strategic offices. Party tickets often circulate within elite networks rather than emerging through transparent internal contests.

First, political identity has become personalized rather than institutional. Parties are frequently vehicles for individual ambition, not ideological platforms. Where institutions are weak, grooming a family successor appears safer than risking independent leadership.

Second, internal party democracy is fragile. Candidate selection processes are often opaque and monetized. Delegates are courted through inducements. Meritocratic pathways are limited, discouraging competent outsiders.

Third, social deference to status and lineage seeps into political culture. Leadership becomes associated with inherited entitlement rather than earned legitimacy. The outcome is predictable: elite reproduction. Policies rarely disrupt entrenched inequality because beneficiaries of the system design the rules.

Reimagining Leadership for a New Africa

To understand the magnetic pull of public office, we must examine incentive structures. In Nigeria and elsewhere, public officials enjoy extensive immunity while in office, control over procurement and budget processes creates opportunities for rent extraction, political appointments serve as rewards for loyalty and anti-corruption enforcement is inconsistent and sometimes selective.

When governance systems fail to guarantee consequences for abuse, the rational calculation shifts. Public office becomes an investment with high returns and low risk. As long as these incentives remain intact, politics will attract those seeking wealth and protection more than those seeking service.

If public office is too attractive, how do we make it less so? How do we transform leadership from prize to responsibility? First, strengthen institutions not individuals. Electoral reforms must deepen transparency. Judicial independence must be safeguarded. Legislative oversight must become assertive rather than symbolic. Anti-corruption bodies require insulation from political interference.

Second, defend and enforce term limits. Constitutional safeguards are only as strong as citizen vigilance. Third, institutionalize internal party democracy. Parties must adopt transparent primaries and financial accountability. Fourth, empower youth and women meaningfully. Nigeria’s “Not Too Young To Run” Act was a milestone, but structural barriers—campaign finance costs, patronage networks—still limit participation while the Reserve Seats Bill for Women is pending.

Fifth, move beyond voting to continuous accountability. Citizens must track budgets, demand open procurement, use freedom-of-information mechanisms, and support investigative journalism. Accountability cannot be seasonal.

Finally, build reform coalitions. Faith leaders, professional bodies, labour unions, student groups, diaspora communities, and civil society organizations must coordinate rather than operate in silos.

Ultimately, structural reform must be accompanied by cultural change. Leadership must be redefined as stewardship, not entitlement. Public service should be honourable precisely because it is accountable.

So, is public office too attractive in Africa? Yes, because we have built systems that make it lucrative, protective, and inheritable. But this is by design. We can redesign incentives, strengthen institutions and reward integrity so that leadership becomes temporary and service permanent.

The views expressed by contributors are strictly personal and not of Law & Society Magazine.

Political meeting at Mama Silifa’s Buka

By Funke Egbemode

Scene: A wooden bench outside Mama Silifa’s Buka. Generator humming. Power just went off. Again. For the second time in 40 minutes.

Koko: (fanning himself with an old newspaper) Nigeria is finished. Completely finished. These politicians have eaten everything. They ate yesterday, they are eating today and now they are taking our future to Dubai.

Kaka: Calm down, prophet of doom. Leave Dubai out of this. Your politicians are taking everything everywhere , especially tax havens that cannot export them back to EFCC custody.

Koko: They carried our money there! Every time EFCC coughs, one politician is hiding in London, Dubai, or pretending to be sick in Germany.

Kaka: I do not know what your ‘aggro’ is? You seem to forget that going into public office is not like boarding a plane to sleep on the beach in Maldives. It is a lot of hard work, politicking. Yes. And don’t forget who carried the politician into office?

Koko: (pauses) You are determined not to let me enjoy my gbegiri and abula with this hot amala.

Kaka: Eating during Lent and Ramadan. You are not faithful to any faith. You are a suspect. But to answer your question, it is we the voters that voted for the politicians who are robbing us blind.

Koko: But we didn’t know they would be corrupt!

Kaka: (laughs loudly) Koko, you mean you didn’t know? The man shared rice, wrappers, and 75,000 at the rally. You called him “our generous son.” What were you expecting? Angel Gabriel?

Koko: That was empowerment!

Kaka: Empowerment? To do what? Fry akara for four years?

Koko: To you. That 5k is peanut but, at least, he remembered us before election.

Kaka: He assembled you somewhere and repeated his line from the last election but forgot you immediately after. That is what happens every time.

Small cup of rice, wrappers and you go home happy, until the next round, abi? You say politicians are corrupt. I agree. But Nigerian voters? We are saints , right?

Koko: Leave voters out of this. We are victims. Do not let me choke on this expensive amala o.

Kaka: Victims that collect money before voting?

Koko: Hunger is not a small thing, my brother.

Kaka: True but when a man starts thinking with his stomach instead of with his brain…The ?5,000 you collected—how many mudu of rice did it buy?

Koko: It is prepaid dividend of democracy.

Kaka: No, it is the politicians looting both your brain and your stomach. A few grains of rice that will last one week for the family, followed by bad governance.

Koko: We know what we are doing.

Kaka: You get ulcer, they get bouncers to keep your smelly selves from their new fortresses.

Koko: It’s just four years, their one term is effectively two years. By the third year, they are running up and down prostrating for godfathers and making sacrifices to their deities of good luck.

Kaka: Exactly. You sold four years for two weeks of enjoyment. Who does that? Someone will buy a G-Wag one year after election while you are left begging for acceptance fee for your child’s admission into the university. You see now that your head is not correct?

Koko: (hisses) So what do you want poor people to do? Refuse free money?

Kaka: It’s not free money. It’s advance payment for your silence and retrogression.

Koko: Silence about what?

Kaka: About bad roads. About no light. About no jobs. About hospitals where nurses will tell you to go and buy outside. Once you collect their money, your mouth is tied. If you complain, they remind you: “Didn’t we support you?”

Koko: But politicians steal billions! We only collect small change.

Kaka: Corruption is not measured by size. It is measured by integrity. If you can sell your vote for 75,000, and the politician can sell contracts for 75 billion, both of you are in the same family. One is junior brother, the other is senior brother.

Koko: So now I am related to thieves?

Kaka: Distant cousin.

Koko: But look at it this way. Elections are expensive. Politicians must spend money to win. So when they enter office, they recover their investment.

Kaka: Listen to yourself. You have turned corruption into business strategy. “Return on Investment Politics Ltd.”

Koko: That’s the reality! They sell their cars, houses. Elections in Nigeria is expensive.

Kaka: Reality created by who? Voters who won’t go out to vote unless paid something. When the candidate who refuses to share money loses election, what lesson are you teaching him?

Koko: That he should be more generous next time, that his ‘akagum’ strategy will only earn him the title ‘former candidate’.

Kaka: Exactly. So next time he will bring bigger rice, bigger cash, louder music. And after winning, bigger stealing.

Koko: (scratches head) Hmm. The politicians have weaponised poverty, that’s why. They made us poor so they can make us accept peanuts.

Kaka: Sharrap !. Weaponized poverty kill you there. So we must all take to crime and immorality because we don’t over enough? Since we started taking politicians vote-and-cook-soup money, are we now richer? Since voters started asking, “How much are they giving?”, has poverty left their homes?

Koko: No, the voters are still stranded and the country is on Life Support.

Koko: But politicians lie too much. They promise heaven and deliver potholes.

Kaka: The following year the voters still wear branded caps and clap for them.

Koko: Because they speak good grammar.

Kaka: Grammar has ruined this country. One candidate will say “infrastructural regeneration through holistic paradigms,” and everybody will shout, “Visionary!”

Koko: (laughing) Nigerians like big English and good music at noisy and dusty rallies.

Kaka: Instead of asking simple questions like : When will we start processing what we grow so we can generate jobs? What are the timelines? How will we fund the budget? No, everybody is dancing orisirisi dance.

Koko: These your questions are too stressful jare.

Kaka: Democracy is stressful. Corruption is comfortable.

Koko: Let me ask you. If you are contesting election and you see other candidates sharing money, will you just sit down?

Kaka: I will tell people to collect the money and still vote their conscience.

Koko: That one is advanced mathematics or even advance fee fraud.

Kaka: It’s called strategy. Take their money. It is your money anyway. But vote wisely.

Koko: And if they monitor?

Kaka: Secret ballot is secret for a reason. But the problem is not fear. The problem is that many voters genuinely prefer the highest bidder. Indeed, the trading starts long before Election Day. The political parties members themselves behave like traders.

Koko: That’s harsh. Party members are stakeholders, insiders, pillars of their parties

Kaka: Be honest, do party members trade or not? Do they buy and sell votes at party primaries or not? Do they get paid for party activities or not?

Koko: But it is still the politicians that manipulate results.

Kaka: Yes. But why is it easy? Because the same voters or party members who will agree to be party agents for small money and look away while figures are adjusted.

Koko: So everybody is chopping something?

Kaka: That’s the tragedy. Corruption in Nigeria is democratic. It goes round.

Koko: You’re sounding like you blame voters more than politicians.

Kaka: No. Politicians hold power; their sins are heavier. But voters create the environment. Think about it: when a known corrupt politician attends a wedding, what happens?

Koko: People rush

to greet him.

Kaka: They struggle to take selfies. They call him “Your Excellency,” even after EFCC invitation.

Koko: Respect is culture in our society. They are just giving honor to the Honorables.

The views expressed by contributors are strictly personal and not of Law & Society Magazine.

A breakdown of the US Supreme Court’s tariff decision against Trump

Empirical SCOTUS is a recurring series by Adam Feldman that looks at Supreme Court data, primarily in the form of opinions and oral arguments, to provide insights into the justices’ decision making and what we can expect from the court in the future.

“We decide whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) authorizes the President to impose tariffs.”

That is the first sentence of Chief Justice John Roberts’ opinion for the court in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, decided today, Feb. 20, 2026. The case arose from a challenge to broad tariffs that the executive branch imposed pursuant to IEEPA’s grant of authority to “regulate . . . importation.” The court’s decision on whether the president had the power to do so was unambiguous…

Click here to continue reading.

U.S. women’s hockey team declines Trump’s invitation to the State of the Union

The U.S. women’s hockey team said it is declining President Donald Trump’s invitation to attend his State of the Union address, a day after the president jokingly told the U.S. men’s hockey team that he would be impeached if he didn’t also invite the women’s team.

“We are sincerely grateful for the invitation extended to our gold medal–winning U.S. Women’s Hockey Team and deeply appreciate the recognition of their extraordinary achievement,” a USA Hockey spokesperson said. “Due to the timing and previously scheduled academic and professional commitments following the Games, the athletes are unable to participate.”

Click here to continue reading.

TIPS