Home Blog Page 423

40-year-old man arraigned for beating girlfriend to death on Valentine’s Day in Ondo

A 40-year-old man, Elvis Mbekwe has been arraigned before a Magistrates’ Court sitting in Akure, on a count of murder.

Mbekwe was accused of beating his 28-year-old girlfriend, Uchenna Akujobi, who lived in his house, with a fist blow and a horsewhip, which led to her death after their Valentine’s Day celebration went sour.

The incident reportedly arose from Mbekwe’s suspicion that his lover was involved in a romantic relationship with a man, who visited her on Valentine’s Day.

Following his arrest by officers of the Ondo State Police Command, the suspect was arraigned on February 26, 2025.

The prosecutor, Folashade Adeyemi, informed the court that the accused and others at large committed the offence on February 14, 2025, at Gold Line Estate, Ile-Oluji, Ile-Oluji/Oke-Igbo Local Government Area of Ondo State.

Adeyemi alleged that on that day, the accused unlawfully caused the death of his girlfriend, Uchenna, by beating her to death.

According to the prosecutor, the defendant demanded an explanation from the deceased about her relationship with a man who frequently visited her in his apartment, even on Valentine’s Day.

She told the court that Mbekwe, who suspected that his lover was having an affair with the man, got infuriated and it led to a verbal war between the duo.

“During the scuffle, the defendant allegedly beat the deceased with a fist blow and a horsewhip which led to her death,” she said.

The prosecutor said the offence contravened Sections 316 and 319(1) of the Criminal Code Laws of Ondo State 2006.

The plea of the defendant was not taken.

Mbekwe, in his statement at the police station, claimed that it was the deceased who attacked him with a broken glass.

Adeyemi prayed the court to remand the defendant to any correctional centre in the state, pending the outcome of advice from the office of the Directorate of Public Prosecutions, DPP, in the State Ministry of Justice.

Magistrate R.I. Adelakin, while granting the prosecutor’s request, remanded the defendant to the Olokuta Correctional Centre pending advice from the DPP.

The magistrate held: “Going through the defendant’s statement and the prosecution claim, I am satisfied that probable cause has been proved by the prosecution for the remand of the defendant as there is a reasonable doubt to suspect that the accused is involved in the commission of the alleged offence.

“Consequently, he should be remanded at the Olokuta Correctional Centre while the case file shall be transmitted to the office of the DPP for advice.”

Adelakin adjourned the case till March 27, 2025, for mention.

Barely a week ago, a 23-year-old man, Gbolahan Adebayo was arrested by the Lagos State Police Command, for allegedly beating his girlfriend to death at Ijedodo in the Alimosho Local Government Area of Lagos State.

PUNCH Metro learnt that the incident occurred during the deceased’s visit to the suspect’s house on Friday 21 February 2025.

A resident who identified himself simply as Akin told our correspondent that the 23-year-old victim was heard screaming for help around midnight while being beaten by her boyfriend.

Akin added that Adebayo later raised the alarm at daybreak after he found out she was no longer responsive after the assault.

He said, “The girl was a regular visitor to the suspect’s home and came around as usual on Friday night. But when it was about 2 am, neighbours started hearing someone screaming and later discovered it was the suspect who was beating her girlfriend in his room. The screaming lasted at intervals for about an hour.

“After that, the screaming stopped. It was in the morning that the boyfriend started shouting for help and when the neighbours who were around at that time went to attend to him, they saw the girl lying motionless on the bed.”

A police source, who spoke to our correspondent on the condition of anonymity because he was not permitted to speak on the matter, said the incident was reported at the Isheri-Oshun Police Division by the suspect’s neighbour on Sunday.

The source said the girl was first taken to the hospital where she later succumbed to the injuries sustained during the incident before it was reported to the police.

“When the neighbour came, he explained that the incident happened two days ago and that efforts were first made to resuscitate the girl but she eventually passed away. As a result, a team of policemen were immediately drafted to the scene, leading to an ongoing investigation.”

When contacted, the spokesperson for the command, Benjamin Hundeyin, confirmed the incident.

The image maker said visible marks of violence were found on the deceased’s body, adding that her corpse had been deposited in the morgue.

He said, “One neighbour reported at Isheri Osun Division that on 21/02/25 at about 2 am, he saw his neighbour, one Gbolahan Adebayo ‘m’ age 23 years beating his girlfriend aged 25 years in his home in Ijedodo for a yet-to-be-determined reason. However, at about 7 am the said Gbolahan Adebayo reportedly screamed for help and on getting to his apartment, the said girlfriend was met lying unconscious on the bed with visible marks of violence found on the body.

“She was immediately taken to a hospital in Ijegun where he was confirmed dead by the doctor on duty. Based on the report, a team of detectives visited the scene of the incident. The hospital was also visited, where the corpse was inspected and photographed. The corpse was evacuated and deposited at the IDH morgue, Yaba for autopsy. The suspect was promptly arrested and an investigation is in progress on the matter,” Hundeyin concluded.

[Video] “My father didn’t sue his granddaughter over inheritance” Herbert Wigwe’s sister speaks on court case over late brother’s estate

Joyce Wigwe, elder sister of the late Herbert Wigwe, has spoken about what led to the court case regarding access to her late brother’s children and handling his estate. 

In an interview with TV360 Exclusive, Joyce revealed that the family has a feud with Aigboje AIG Imoukhuede, Wigwe’s close friend and business associate, not with Herbert’s children. 

“I don’t know where to start… from when Herbert passed on or not… we didn’t realise there was a disagreement,” she said. 

Following Wigwe’s death, a legal dispute emerged concerning the administration of his estate. 

In November 2024, his father, Pastor Shyngle Wigwe, and cousin, Christian Chukwuka Wigwe, filed a motion seeking the appointment of interim administrators for the estate. 

They expressed concerns over potential mismanagement and requested oversight of the guardianship of Herbert’s minor children. However, in February 2025, the Lagos State High Court dismissed their application, ruling that the claimants lacked the legal standing to intervene, as they were not beneficiaries under Herbert’s will. 

The court upheld the provisions of the will, which appointed Herbert’s cousin, Uche Wigwe, and business partner, Aigboje Aig-Imoukhuede, as trustees and personal representatives. 

Additionally, the court affirmed the existing guardianship arrangement for Herbert’s minor children, emphasising the importance of adhering to the deceased’s documented wishes. 

Joyce explained that their father was reassured by Herbert’s friends that they were also his “children” and this made the family let their guards down. 

She noted that her parents had always welcomed Herbert’s friends and spouses into the family, including the family of Aigboje Aig-Imoukhuede, Wigwe’s close business partner. 

“My parents were particularly close to AIG’s (Aigboje) family as well, particularly his late mum, may her soul rest in peace,” she stated. 

However, tensions became apparent during Herbert’s funeral when Aigboje and his wife allegedly prevented the family from getting close to the children. 

“It was obvious from the funeral that AIG and his wife kept flanking the kids and would not let us get close to the kids,” Joyce recalled. 

She mentioned that even attempts to adjust seating arrangements were overridden by Access Bank staff, following instructions from their superiors. 

After the funeral, Joyce claimed AIG held confidential meetings with her father, accompanied by his lawyer, barring other family members. 

“They would come to the house and take Daddy into the room… and my dad was like, that’s fine, he can handle it,” she said. 

Joyce questioned the secrecy, given that she is a lawyer and could have been involved. 

During these meetings, AIG allegedly requested that Joyce’s father sign documents related to Herbert’s estate. 

According to Joyce, her niece, Herbert’s daughter, Tochi, had chosen to work with her grandfather on the estate. 

“She said she wants to work with her grandfather on this thing,” Joyce said. 

However, the lawyer handling the matter, identified as Pairo, reportedly refused to leave a copy of the signed documents with the family. 

Each time the family requested the documents, Joyce alleged the lawyer provided excuses. 

“He refused… each time we asked, he said, ‘Oh, I’m bringing it, oh, I’m travelling,’” she said. 

Joyce expressed frustration at the lack of transparency, especially as a legal professional herself. 

Despite the estate issues, she confirmed that the family maintained a close relationship with Herbert’s children. 

“We’ve always had a close relationship with the children,” she said, adding that her niece had been advised to keep copies of any documents she signed. 

Joyce revealed that the last conversation she had with her niece was when she reminded her to keep copies of any paperwork. 

“She said, ‘Yes, Auntie, I will,’ and that was the last conversation I had with her,” Joyce stated, suggesting that unforeseen developments had since occurred. 

Joyce added that her father’s fight is not with his granddaughter. 

She explained that the issue is that AIG stopped providing for their father and he claimed he stopped doing so because he believed Herbert’s father was using the monthly stipend to hire lawyers to sue him. Consequently, the family said they believe Herbert’s estate has enough money to provide for his parents as he did when he was alive. So they decided to file an interim application in the court to let them know Herbert’s interest in Access Bank, his life insurance, and all the things that pertain to Herbert. 

Explaining how close their family is, she stated that when Herbert’s first son Chizi graduated from university, the entire Wigwe family and their children were there for the graduation as is their family culture because Herbert valued family. 

On February 9, 2024, Herbert Wigwe, along with his wife Doreen and their 29-year-old son Chizi died in a helicopter crash near Nipton, California. The family was en route from Palm Springs International Airport to Boulder City, Nevada, intending to attend Super Bowl LVIII in Las Vegas. 

The crash also claimed the lives of former Nigerian Exchange Group Plc Chairman Abimbola Ogunbanjo and two crew members. 

Watch Joyce address the feud in the video below.

Adverb Lookalikes

By Chinua Asuzu

As you already know, not every word ending in -ly is an adverb.

Not every word that looks like an adverb is one.

The following words are not adverbs, but mostly adjectives.

A few, like melancholy and orderly, are nouns as well.

Contumely is an out-and-out noun.

These are mostly adjectives, even if a few may equally belong to other word classes:

beggarly, burly, chilly, comely, costly, cowardly, curmudgeonly, curly, dastardly, deadly, deathly, disorderly, early, earthly, elderly, friendly, frilly, ghastly, ghostly, godly, goodly, grisly, heavenly, hilly, holy, homely, jolly, kingly, leisurely, likely, lively, lonely, lovely, lowly, manly, masterly, melancholy, niggardly, oily, orderly, otherworldly, prickly, poorly, portly, prickly, princely, queenly, scholarly, seemly, shapely, sickly, silly, slovenly, sly, sprightly, timely, ugly, ungainly, unlikely, unmanly, unruly, unseemly, untimely, unworldly, womanly,
worldly.

Meanwhile…

“Effective writing does not use legalese. It’s clear and simple. Bloated writing stuffed with medieval jargon and convoluted sentences that go on forever provokes mistrust. It looks like you’re hiding something because you’re not just saying it straight out.

Legalese can even introduce confusion. Plain language is straightforward, uses terms of art where it should, and says what it means.” Gary Kinder, ‘How to Write the Perfect Brief,’ http://wordrake.com

Stop proliferating issues, Supreme Court warns advocates

In Habibu [2024] 6 NWLR (Part 1935) 483 (SC), 534H–535A, Jauro JSC deprecated issue proliferation, saying:

“[T]he strategy of the appellant’s counsel … is to raise any issue possible, real or imagined, against the judgment of the lower court. From those issues that may appear to be genuine complaints against the judgment of the lower court, to those that appear flimsy down to the outright ridiculous, he raised them all. This is not a good strategy. Counsel should always endeavor to do away with any insubstantial arguments and keep appeals within the limits of genuine and reasonable complaints, if any, arising from the decision appealed against.”

The Humour in Legal Terminology: The origins of a witty observation

By E. Monjok Agom

The world of law is often associated with complexity, nuance, and a dash of dry wit. One quote that encapsulates this wit is the observation that “a lawyer is the only person who writes a 20,000-word document and calls it a brief.” But who coined this phrase, and what does it reveal about the nature of legal language?

THE ELUSIVE ORIGINS OF A WITTY QUOTE

Despite its popularity, the origins of this quote remain shrouded in mystery. Some attribute it to the renowned philosopher and economist Karl Marx, while others claim it is the brainchild of a lesser-known wit. However, a thorough search of Marx’s writings and biographies yields no concrete evidence to support this claim.

A SIMILAR QUOTE FROM A LITERARY GIANT

Interestingly, a similar quote can be found in the writings of Robert Louis Stevenson, the celebrated Scottish novelist and travel writer. In his works, Stevenson remarks, “A lawyer’s brief is usually a long document, and the longer it is, the more brief it is likely to be.” While not identical to the original quote, Stevenson’s witticism captures the essence of the observation, highlighting the irony of a lawyer’s “brief” often being a lengthy and intricate document.

THE IRONY OF LEGAL LANGUAGE

So, what does this quote reveal about the nature of legal language? On one hand, it showcases the often-contradictory nature of legal terminology. A “brief” is expected to be concise and to-the-point, yet in reality, it can be a lengthy and intricate document. This irony is not unique to the term “brief”; many legal terms are similarly counterintuitive, reflecting the complexities and nuances of the law.

THE EVOLUTION OF BRIEFS IN MODERN TIMES

However, in today’s world, the courts have made it an official policy to restrict the number of pages in a Brief. This shift towards brevity and concision is a deliberate attempt to streamline the legal process and prevent unnecessary verbosity.

For instance, in the Court of Appeal in Nigeria, a brief is limited to 35 pages, except with leave. This means that lawyers must be judicious in their use of language and focus on presenting the most critical arguments and evidence in a clear and concise manner.

MATERIALS THAT MAKE FOR A CONCISE AND LUMINOUS BRIEF

So, what makes a brief concise and luminous? Here are some essential materials to include:

  • CLEAR AND CONCISE STATEMENT OF FACTS: A brief should begin with a clear and concise statement of facts, setting out the key events and circumstances of the case.
  • PRECISE AND RELEVANT LEGAL AUTHORITY: A brief should include precise and relevant legal authority, citing statutes, case law, and other authoritative sources that support the argument.
  • FOCUSED AND LOGICAL ARGUMENTATION: A brief should present focused and logical argumentation, setting out the key arguments and evidence in a clear and concise manner.
  • CONCISE AND ACCURATE CITATIONS: A brief should include concise and accurate citations, referencing the relevant authorities and evidence that support the argument.
  • CLEAR AND CONCISE CONCLUSION: A brief should conclude with a clear and concise summary of the argument, setting out the key points and takeaways.

THE BENEFITS OF BREVITY IN LEGAL BRIEFS

The restriction on the length of briefs has several benefits. Firstly, it encourages lawyers to be more focused and concise in their arguments, which can lead to more effective advocacy. Secondly, it helps to reduce the workload of judges and court staff, allowing them to devote more time to the actual hearing of cases. Finally, it promotes efficiency and expediency in the administration of justice.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the quote “a lawyer is the only person who writes a 20,000-word document and calls it a brief” remains a witty observation with unclear origins. However, in modern times, the courts have taken steps to restrict the length of briefs, promoting brevity, concision, and efficiency in the legal process. By including clear and concise statements of facts, precise and relevant legal authority, focused and logical argumentation, concise and accurate citations, and clear and concise conclusions, lawyers can craft concise and luminous briefs that effectively advocate for their clients.

E. Monjok Agom
28th February, 2025

Ondo High Court sends man to 18 years in jail for raping and brutally assaulting 23-year-old woman after she rejected his advances

A High Court of Justice, Ondo State sitting in Akure has sentenced a 31-year-old man, Ojo Balogun, to 18 years in prison for r3ping and assaulting a 23-year-old lady (name withheld) after she rejected his advances.

Balogun was arraigned in 2021 on a two-count charge of unlawful and indecent assault and r3pe. He was remanded at Olokuta Correctional Centre before his trial.

Delivering judgment on February 26, 2025, Justice Yemi Fasanmi ruled that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, finding Balogun guilty on both counts.

The judge sentenced him to two years for indecent assault and 16 years for r@pe, to run concurrently.

Prosecuting counsel, H.O. Falowo, told the court that Balogun attacked the victim on June 20, 2020, around 2:30 p.m. at Oje Farm, Afin-Akoko.

He punched her in the face, beat her with a stick, and dragged her into the bush, where he raped her Falowo said the offences contravened Sections 360, 357, and 358 of the Criminal Code Law, Cap. 37, Vol. 1, Laws of Ondo State, 2006.

The prosecution called five witnesses and tendered evidence, including statements, a medical report, and torn underpants.

The victim narrated her ordeal in court, stating that she was on her way to the farm when Balogun attacked her.

“He punched my eyes, beat me with a stick, and dragged me into the bush. He threw away my pants and pressed my mouth while I struggled. Blood was gushing from my mouth as he raped me. Afterwards, he ran away. I couldn’t walk and had to be rushed to the hospital,” she recounted.

She added that she had rejected Balogun’s love advances in 2019, which led to resentment.

Balogun denied raping the victim but admitted to beating her.

However, the judge dismissed his defence, citing medical reports and witness testimonies.

“The doctor’s report confirms forced penetration. The bruises, torn pant, and the defendant’s own admissions corroborate the prosecution’s case.”

He condemned the rising cases of sexual violence, stating that Balogun deserved no sympathy.

“This court must send a strong message. Sexual assaults must be nipped in the bud,” the judge declared.

Sister of abducted Oyo youth corps member says driver handed her over to kidnappers

Aminat Lawal, the sister of the abducted National Youth Service Corps member, Rofiat Lawal, who was kidnapped along the Benin-Ore Expressway on Tuesday, has revealed that her sister was handed over to the abductors who were suspected Fulanis by the driver conveying them.

Aminat disclosed this in an exclusive interview with PUNCH Metro on Thursday.

PUNCH Metro reports that Rofiat was abducted by yet-to-be-identified kidnappers while returning to her Place of Primary Assignment in Oyo State.

A friend of the victim identified as Agbakwara, who raised the alarm about Rofiat’s kidnap in a post on Facebook on Wednesday, noted that the abductors were demanding the sum of N20m for her release.

Agbakwara wrote, “My close friend, Lawal Rofiat Kofoworola, was kidnapped on her way from Benin to Ibadan to resume her PPA in Ogbomosho. She managed to call yesterday and told me she was on an Ore-bound bus when she was taken.

“This is someone who has struggled all her life, supporting herself through university by working at the Dufil company in Benin. Now, kidnappers are demanding N20 million, and we don’t know what to do. Her parents are less privileged and can’t afford this.

“I have reported to the NYSC Secretariat in Ibadan and dropped her call-up number, but there has been no response. We are exhausted and desperate for help.”

Speaking with our correspondent, Aminat disclosed that her sister narrated that the driver conveying them from Benin stopped at Ore where the kidnappers came out from a nearby bush and took them while the driver zoomed off.

She narrated that when the kidnappers contacted them, they demanded N25m ransom for her release, which they pleaded they could not pay, but after several back and forth, they lowered the demand to N5m.

Aminat said, “She contacted us on Tuesday to tell us that she was kidnapped and she said that the driver of the car she boarded was the one who dropped them at the spot where she was kidnapped alongside other passengers.

“When we spoke with the kidnappers, they asked us to bring N25m and we told them that we did not have such money. She is the one who sponsored herself in school. They have reduced the ransom to N5m.”

Meanwhile, the family had resorted to crowdfunding to raise the ransom as requested by the abductors.

In a follow-up conversation with Agbakwara, on Thursday, he noted that the family had resorted to crowdfunding to raise the ransom demanded by the abductors while corroborating the claim that the abducted corper was handed over to her abductors by the driver.

“This evening, the kidnappers allowed my friend and the other victims to call their families. She told me in tears that they were handed over to the Fulani kidnappers after the vehicle they were in dropped them off and drove away. They are all female and have been suffering without food since they were taken.

“The kidnappers are demanding N20m, but she begged that we help raise any amount at all to begin negotiations. She has already spent two days in captivity, and we don’t know what will happen next. We are scared and desperate for help.

“Please, Nigerians, any amount you can donate will go a long way. We can’t wait any longer. Let’s come together and help bring her back safely,” Agbakwara said.

The Oyo State NYSC Coordinator, Odoba Abel Oche, who confirmed the incident in a telephone conversation with our correspondent earlier on Thursday, noted that the victim had left Oyo State for Edo State without notifying the state’s NYSC leadership.

He stressed that security operatives had been alerted to the situation for necessary action while saying that he was not aware if any ransom had been requested by the abductors.

“Her parents reported the incident to us yesterday. We were not aware of the incident before her parents reported it.

“We have contacted the national headquarters, the Ondo and Edo NYSC and we have also alerted security agencies for necessary action. I am not aware if the kidnappers have reached out to demand ransom.

“She went home to Benin without informing the NYSC authority against the instruction of the NYSC. The NYSC has continued to emphasise to corps members the need to always notify the authorities before they travel and to also avoid night travels,” Oche said.

Efforts to get the reaction of the Ondo Police Public Relations Office, Odunlami, proved abortive as she had yet to respond to calls made to her line as at the time of filing this report.

There are growing concerns over the renewed surge in kidnapping which has left no fewer than five other persons captive in the last two weeks.

On February 17, some gunmen kidnapped the National President of the Afenifere Youth Council, Eniola Ojajuni, in Abuja, the Federal Capital Territory.

Similarly, four female students of the Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University, Makurdi, Benue State were abducted on the university’s campus by yet-to-be-identified gunmen on Tuesday.

PUNCH Metro reported in July 2024 that some abducted corps members from Ondo State said the family of each of the victims paid a sum of N1 million before they were set free.

The five victims, who include four corps members and one artisan, were kidnapped by the bandits at about 11 pm at Omi Alafa Village in Ifon, Ose Local Government Area, and dragged the victims into the forest.

The corps members were said to be going back home after the three-week National Youth Service Corps Orientation camp in Enugu and Abia States. It was gathered that the driver and one passenger sitting in front of the vehicle were shot dead by the bandits.

Supreme Court has ended impunity in Rivers, says ex-Governor Wike: A Phyrric victory and a judgment without justice

By Tonye Clinton Jaja

Nyesom Ezenwo Wike (NEW) was correct when he said about today’s judgment: “Supreme Court has ended impunity in Rivers, says ex-Governor Wike”.

One of the immunities that the Supreme Court of Nigeria put an end to was the use of the premises of the Rivers State House of Assembly for meetings by Amawhule and his group, whose status as law-makers is awaiting final determination by the Supreme Court of Nigeria and a federal high court in Port Harcourt.

Both by the operation of the doctrine of necessity and by his role as the Chief Security Officer of Rivers State, Governor Fubara had a legal duty to prevent infrastructure of Rivers State from being used by persons whose status are awaiting final determination by both the Supreme Court of Nigeria and the federal high court, Port Harcourt.

The Governor of Anambra State is currently applying such tactics by the demolition of premises where illegal persons perpetrating unlawful activities are resident or using such premises for their illegal activities.

Another impunity that the judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria has resolved today is the issue of whether Amawhule and his 26 can engage in law-making activities before the final determination of their status by both the Supreme Court of Nigeria and the federal high court, Port Harcourt.

Before now, they were busy churning out Bills and Resolution as if it were a “candy factory”.

With today’s judgment, which says that they should resume, doesn’t imply that they can engage in law-making activities until their status is finally determined by the relevant courts of law.

The implication of today’s judgment is that the Supreme Court of Nigeria is stating that for the records, we recognise that Amawhule was Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly as of November 2023.

However, we are going to make a final determination as to whether Amawhule and the 26 are still law-makers of the Rivers State House of Assembly after December 2023 when they announced their defection from the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) to the All Progressives Congress (APC).

So in the final analysis, NEW is celebrating a “Phyrric” victory.

A Phyrric victory is defined as: “achieved at excessive cost. A Pyrrhic victory is also costly to the point of negating or outweighing expected benefits. A great but Pyrrhic act of ingenuity.”

So what is there to celebrate because the Supreme Court of Nigeria stated that:

“The Supreme Court has stopped the Central Bank of Nigeria and the Accountant General of the Federation from allocating funds to the Rivers State government until a valid appropriation law is passed by the Rivers State House of Assembly.”

NEW has forgotten that Amawhule and the 26 would not receive any salaries and allowances during the period that Rivers State Government allocations are withheld by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).

And this period would last until the same Supreme Court of Nigeria makes a final determination as to the status of Amawhule and the 26!!!

Also, on the issue of the Rivers State Local Government Area (LGA) Council elections that was cancelled by the Supreme Court of Nigeria, what is NEW celebrating about?

It doesn’t reinstate the previous LGA Chairmen whose tenures were extended by Amawhule and the 26!!!

At best fresh elections would be held and we all know that this would be after the final determination of the status of Amawhule and the 26!!!

And since nature abhors a vacuum, caretaker Chairmen would have to be appointed by His Excellency, Governor Simnialayi Fubara to take charge until whenever the legal hurdles are clarified before the LGA Council elections would hold.

Alternatively, as is the case the incumbent LGA Chairpersons would still hold forth until such a time!!!

Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja,
Executive Director,
Nigerian Law Society (NLS).

Rivers House of Assembly Imbroglio: Onoja, SAN says Supreme Court verdict has put an end to executive recklessness

  • Law Teacher faults decision, says: ” My worry is why the Supreme would direct a group whose legal status was yet to be determined, to resume sitting…”

The Senior Advocate of Nigeria who led the pro-Wike lawmakers to victory at the Supreme Court on Friday, Dr. James Ogwu Onoja has described the decision of the apex court as a final solution to executive recklessness.

Dr. Onoja led Moses Ebute SAN and Paul Dauda, SAN.

See the video below.

But Sylvester Udemezue, a social critic and lecturer at the Nigerian Law School disagrees that the apex court’s verdict which nullified the recent local government elections in Rivers State and upheld the legitimacy of the 27-member Martin Amaewhule-led State Assembly is a boost to constitutionality.

“We all should be worried about the judgement of the Supreme Court given today. Those celebrating are celebrating prematurely because the discussion is not over (even the Supreme Court so attested when it says the legal status of the group of 27 is yet to be determined. My worry is why the Supreme would direct a group whose legal status was yet to be determined, to resume sitting. Wouldn’t it have been more appropriate for the apex Court to rule on their legal status (one way or the other) so as to settle a these WAHALA once and for all, and WITH FINALITY?

“Was the issue of DEFECTION not raised before my Lords of the apex Court? Was the issue not raised before my Lords, about whether the group of 27 had the LOCUS STANDI to represent the House of Assembly of Rivers State, and to institute the lawsuits? Why did the Supreme Court choose to ignore them but was quick to authorize the group of 27 (WHOSE LEGAL STATUS WAS YET TO BE DETERMINED, AS THE SUPREME COURT ITSELF ADMITTED) to resume sitting to do the work of the House of Assembly even when the attention of the Court had been drawn to their defection and the huge legal effects?

“With due respect, the judgement of the Supreme Court is one-sided, failed to deal with and SETTLE the real issues for determination in Rivers State (defection) since all other issues EMANATED FROM and accordingly DEPEND ON the question of defection.

“The Governor told the Court that the reason he’ was not relating with the group of 27 was because they had defection and thereby lost their seats, on 11 December 2023.. The group of 27 told the court that the Court should ignore Fubara and direct the Governor to recognize the group as representing the legislature of Rivers State. The Supreme Court after looking at the argument of the two sides, decided to ignore the FUNDAMENTAL issues raised by Fubara, and instead approved the position of the group of 27 directing that the position of the Governor should be left to determined by the courts. How balanced was such a decision?”

However, the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, has hailed the judgment while pointing out that the apex court’s decision has effectively ended the reign of impunity in Rivers State.

The former Rivers governor also took a swipe at former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and the Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Governors’ Forum, Bauchi State Governor Bala Mohammed, accusing them of supporting lawlessness in the state.

According to Wike, Governor Siminalayi Fubara has no choice but to fully comply with the Supreme Court’s verdict, as it represents the final legal authority on the matter.

The ruling marks a major development in the ongoing political crisis in Rivers State, reinforcing the authority of the Amaewhule-led Assembly while nullifying the controversial local government elections.

Delta State High Court declares 16 years minimum admission age into universities set by JAMB unconstitutional

The Delta State High Court of Justice Warri, presided by Hon. Justice Anthony O. Akpovi J, on Thursday 27 February 2025 held that the 16 years minimum admission age into universities set by the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) is unconstitutional.

His Lordship in Suit No. W/311/FHR/2024, John Aikpokpo-Martins v Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) & 4 Ors. gave judgment in favour of John Aikpokpo-Martins. John Aikpokpo-Martins had filed a public interest case seeking the following reliefs:

  1. A Declaration that by virtue of the combined effect of sections 18(1) and 42 of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the restriction of the minimum admissible age into Nigerian universities fixed at 16 years by the 1st defendant and/or any other person or authority violates the constitutional mandate/directive for equal educational opportunities at all levels for all citizens as provided for under the said section 18 (1) and the freedom from discrimination as guaranteed by section 42 of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 and is therefore unconstitutional, null and void.
  2. A DECLARATION that the circular of the 1st respondent dated the 16th day of October, 2024 captioned “Admission of Candidates With Minimum Admissible Age Of 16 Years” signed by Mohammed A. Babaji to all Nigerian Universities including the 2nd defendant directing them to admit only candidates who will be 16 years old by the 31st day of August 2025 violently violates the fundamental right to freedom from discrimination of the candidates who will be 16 years from the 1st of September, 2025 to the 31st of December, 2025 guaranteed by section 42 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 and is therefore unconstitutional, null and void and of no effect.
  3. An Order setting aside the circular of the 1st respondent dated the 16th day of October, 2024 captioned “Admission of Candidates With Minimum Admissible Age Of 16 Years” signed by Mohammed A. Babaji to all Nigerian Universities for being unconstitutional, null and void and of no effect.
  4. An order directing the respondents to admit and/or issue letters of admission to all those candidates who are due to be 16 years from the 1st of January, 2025 to the 31st of December, 2025 and who met all other admission criteria.
  5. An order restraining the 2nd respondent from withdrawing the admission already granted to candidates who will 16 years from 1st of September, 2025 to December 2025 on the basis of the 1st respondent’s directive dated the 16th of October, 2024.
  6. An Order of perpetual injunction restraining the Respondents whether by themselves, their agents, servants, privies and officials from denying candidates admission into Nigerian Universities only on the ground of not haven attained 16 years of age.

An interesting aspect of this case is that A. O. Mohammed, SAN, counsel representing JAMB contended that the court has no jurisdiction to hear and determine the case on the ground that section 18(1) of the 1999 constitution which provides that “government shall direct its policy towards ensuring that there are equal and adequate educational opportunities at all levels” is not justiciable being a part of chapter 2 of the constitution.

John O. Aikpokpo-Martins ., who appeared for himself contended that provisions of chapter 2 of the constitution are ordinarily non-justiciable, however, when such provisions are combined with any provision of the constitution that is justiciable, such provisions of chapter 2 becomes justiciable.

He contended that combining section 18(1) with section 42 of the 199 constitution makes section 18(1) justiciable.

Hon. Justice Anthony O. Akpovi agreed with the submissions, granted his reliefs and entered judgment in his favour except his relief for damages.

TIPS