Home Blog Page 40

Policeman detained for allegedly altering case file, doctor’s report

The Zone 2 Police Command headquarters, Onikan, Lagos State, has confirmed the detention of an Investigating Police Officer (IPO) attached to Isheri-Oshun Division, for allegedly doctoring a case file and medical doctor’s report.

The Assistant Inspector General of Police in charge of the zone, Adegoke Fayoade, confirmed this to the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) on Tuesday in Lagos.

Mr Fayoade did not provide the name of the IPO.

However, he said the officer allegedly doctored the case file and doctor’s report relating to a case of anal sexual assault on some teenage students by a hotelier in Isheri-Oshun area of the state.

NAN had earlier reported the detention of a hotelier by operatives of the zone for allegedly having anal sex with some teenage students at his hotel.

The hotelier had allegedly threatened the students never to tell anyone about the act, else, they would die.

The secret was made public after one of the victims, a 16-year-old boy, confessed to his parents about the act.

Police sources told NAN that after the detention of the suspect, his lawyer claimed that they earlier reported the case to the same zone for proper investigation.

The sources said that when their case file was recovered from one of the units, it was discovered that it was doctored.

“The confessional statement made at Isheri Osun Division by another teenager, who suffered the same fate and reports from doctors at Mirable Center at the General Hospital, Ikeja, Lagos, were doctored.

“Based on this, the AIG directed that more investigations be carried out, and this led detectives from the Zonal Oracle unit led by CSP Uba storming Isheri Osun Police Station.

“When they got there, the IPO who delivered the doctored report confessed that he removed some statements from the case file.

“He later brought out the hidden statements, and it turned out to be that of a second victim, who gave vivid details of what the hotelier did to them with documented evidence,” the source said.

NAN also learnt that some other police officers from Ejigbo division may be invited for interrogation over their alleged roles during the raid by detectives from the zonal command on the hotel to arrest the suspect.

NAN

Video: Tems dedicates Grammy win to mum

0

Nigerian singer, Tems, delivered a heartfelt speech as she accepted the Best African Music Performance award for her song Love Me Jeje at the 67th Grammy Awards.

Taking the stage, an emotional Tems expressed gratitude, saying, ““Wow, dear God. Thank you so much for putting me on this stage and bringing me this team.

“Tomorrow is my mum’s birthday and this is her first Grammys. I just want to thank you ma because she has really done a lot for me and my brother.

“Happy birthday mum. And I want to thank my team. Muyiwa, Wale, my beautiful stylist, and lovely girls… I love you guys.

“Thank you so much. To God be the glory. Honestly, He has changed my life so much.”

Tems won the Best African Music Performance category at the 67th Grammy Awards with her song Love Me Jeje.

This marks Tems’ second Grammy win, following her first award for her contribution to Future’s hit single Wait For U.

In a highly competitive category, Love Me Jeje triumphed over Yemi Alade’s Tomorrow, Asake’s MMS, Chris Brown’s Sensational (featuring Davido & Lojay), and Burna Boy’s Higher. Notably, all the nominees in this year’s category were Nigerian artists, highlighting the country’s continued dominance on the global music stage.

Tems’ latest Grammy win further cements her status as one of Africa’s most celebrated global music icons.

The Best African Music Performance category, introduced only last year, was previously won by South African star Tyla for her hit single Water.

Tems’ victory this year continues to showcase the rich talent emerging from the continent.

The 67th Grammy Awards took place at the Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles on Sunday.

Click here to watch the video.

PUNCH

Fact-checkers reveals “misleading” verdict against Buhari’s alleged sole reliance on house rent for feeding

The claims made by former President Muhammadu Buhari during an All Progressives Congress (APC) caucus meeting at Katsina that he relies on rental income from one of his houses in Kaduna State to support his living expenses after serving two terms as Nigeria’s president has been found to be untrue.

‎These widely reported claims have left many to doubt if he said so and wondering if the statement attributed to a man known for his honesty and integrity could hold any truth.

‎A reader expressed scepticism following reports of Buhari’s claims, stating: “How can this be true? As a retired army general, he receives over N1 million in monthly pension, not to mention the generous life pension provided to former presidents and heads of state. Something doesn’t add up here.”

‎Muhammadu Buhari served as the military head of state from 1983 to 1985, taking over from Shehu Shagari after the 1983 coup d’état. During his military rule, Buhari implemented several policies aimed at addressing corruption, economic decline, and social indiscipline. His administration introduced the War Against Indiscipline (WAI) in 1984, which focused on promoting public morality and civic responsibility.

‎Buhari also served as the President of Nigeria from 2015 to 2023, running on the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC). His presidency was marked by efforts to tackle corruption, improve the economy, and enhance national security.

‎Verification: To verify the accuracy of his claim, PRNigeria fact-check team conducted a keyword search and discovered that the claims had been published by mainstream media on Monday, January 27, 2025 which confirmed he said so.

‎Similarly, findings showed that the former President made the statement while speaking at the All Progressives Congress (APC) caucus meeting, held at the Presidential Banquet Hall of the Government House in Katsina State.

‎“Nigeria is a difficult country to govern, but most Nigerians are unaware. You will not understand the complexities of leadership and the country itself until you find yourself in the administrative position of the country.

‎“I look much better and healthier now than when I was the president of the country. Anybody that sees me now acknowledges that I look better than before.

‎“After eight years as a civilian president, I have only three houses; one in Daura and two in Kaduna. I have given one out for renting where I get money for FEEDING,” he stated.

‎Further investigation showed that in 2016, Buhari stated that he did not receive the pensions due to him as a retired military officer, unlike many of his contemporaries.

‎Meanwhile, the federal government annually allocates funds in the budgets for former leaders. For instance, during his tenure, Buhari’s administration allocated N7.8 billion for entitlements to former presidents, deputies, and others in 2021. According to details from the approved 2021 budget, approximately N7.8 billion was set aside for entitlements, severance allowances, and other benefits for the nation’s former leaders.

‎The 2021 allocation was the second-lowest amount designated for retired top government officials since 2017, when N5.9 billion was budgeted for their gratuities. Of the N7.8 billion allocated in 2021, former heads of state, presidents, and their deputies were set to receive a combined entitlement of N2.3 billion.

Similarly, ‎as stipulated by the Revenue Mobilisation and Fiscal Allocation Commission (RMFAC), a former president is entitled to a severance pay of N10.54 million, which is 300% of his annual basic salary, while a former vice president is entitled to N9.09 million.

‎Additionally, under the law, former presidents receive a monthly upkeep allowance of N350,000, while former vice presidents and chiefs of general staff receive N250,000. This amount is subject to review whenever there is an increase in the salary of the serving president.

Recently, the Tinubu led Federal Government earmarked a total of N13,805,814,220 for the upkeep of former presidents, vice-presidents, heads of state, Chiefs of General Staff, retired heads of service, permanent secretaries, as well as retired heads of government agencies and parastatals in the 2024 fiscal year.

The beneficiaries include former Presidents Olusegun Obasanjo, Goodluck Jonathan, and Muhammadu Buhari, as well as ex-vice-presidents Atiku Abubakar, Namadi Sambo and Prof Yemi Osinbajo.

Also expected to benefit from the windfall are ex-military Heads of State, General Yakubu Gowon and General Abdulsalami Abubakar, as well as a former dictator and self-styled military President, General Ibrahim Babangida, and a former Chief of General Staff, Commodore Ebitu Ukiwe (retd.).

Moreover, while President Buhari claims he has only three houses, one in Daura and two in Kaduna in which he has given out one for rent, his 2015 asset declaration indicates that the former President actually has five homes and two mud houses, as well as farms an orchard and a ranch with 270 head of cattle, 25 sheep, five horses and a variety of birds. Additionally, Buhari owns shares in three firms, two undeveloped plots of lands and bought two cars from his savings.

However, his 2023 asset declaration while leaving office was not made public yet.

Conclusion: The findings by PRNigeria showed that former President Muhammadu Buhari is entitled to huge statutory severance packages and monthly entitlements from the military as a retired Army General and former Head of State/President. Also, contrary to his claim of having only three houses on which he relies on the rental income of one of the houses in Kaduna to support his living expenses after leaving office, Buhari’s publicly known assets include five homes and two mud houses, as well as farms an orchard and a ranch with 270 head of cattle, 25 sheep, five horses and a variety of birds. Additionally, Buhari owns shares in three firms, two undeveloped plots of lands and bought two cars from his savings. Therefore, it is possible rental income only augments his other incomes.

PRNigeria, therefore, concludes that the claim that former President Muhammadu Buhari relies on rental income for his living expenses is misleading.

PRNigeria

Cyber Stalking: A potent tool for criminalizing free speech

By Obioma Ezenwobodo

Introduction:

It is a disturbing commentary on our legal system that cyber stalking has endured as a potent tool. used by law enforcement agencies and affluent/privileged citizens, to harass, intimidate and criminalise free and uncomplimentary speeches instead of resorting to defamation suits as properly envisaged by law. With the emergence of computer and internet in the cyber world, there was also emergence of cyber related crimes such as identity theft, data breaches, computer viruses, scams, and expanded upon in other malicious acts. This led to enactment of legal regimes to regulate cyber operations and curtail cybercrimes.

The Old Trend:

Nigerian came up with the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, Etc) Act of 2015 to primarily prevent, detect, and punish cybercrimes in Nigeria and to also promote cyber security and protect citizens’ privacy rights. The major snag in the legislation was section 24(1)(a) and (b) of the Act which nebulously defined cyber stalking as follows:

Before this amendment, these provisions defined cyberstalking to include materials that were grossly offensive, indecent, obscene, of menacing character or sent to cause annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, hatred, ill will and needless anxiety.

This hazy, vague and cloudy definition of cyber stalking, that simply means the use of the internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual or organization (according to Wikipedia), became an official format through which free speech and expression are impeded and individuals, especially journalists and activists, are harassed and intimidated. Every offensive or unfair expression/messages could be deemed to be cyber stalking or criminal defamation fetching the accused person some days in the detention before bail is granted. A non-governmental agency, the Committee to Protect Journalists asserted that the primary tool used to harass journalists is the 2015 Cybercrime Act, which has been cited in the prosecution of at least 25 media professionals since its inception. The abuse of the provision was horrifying.

In 2019, an attempt to have the section expunged for being inconsistent with sections 36(12) and 39 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigerian (as altered) was unsuccessful. In the case of OKEDARA v. A.G FEDERATION (2019) LPELR-47298(CA), the Court of Appeal in upholding the constitutionality of the infamous section (provision) held, amongst other things, that the section is not in conflict with the provisions of the Constitution and therefore permissible in a democratic setting.

It took the dedicated efforts of the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) to challenge the provisions of the section at the Court of Justice of the regional Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). In 2022, the regional Court gave its reformative and far-reaching ruling nullifying the Constitutionality of the section. The honouirable court ordered Nigeria to amend the said section 24 of the Cybercrime (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Act 2015 to conform to international human rights treaties it has ratified, in particular the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights (ACHPR) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).

The New Trend:

In compliance with the 2022 ruling of the ECOWAS Court, section 24(1) (a) and (b) was amended in the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, ETC) (Amendment) Act, 2024. Under the extant Act, the debilitating definition of cyber stalking have been diluted to read thus:

Any person who knowingly or intentionally sends a message or other matter by means of computer systems or network that –

  • is pornographic
  • he or she knows to be false, for the purpose of causing a breakdown of law and order, posing a threat to life, or causing such message to be sent,

Though amendment of the provision fell short of expected restriction of cyber stalking to strictly cyber related crimes, the amendment went a long way to de-criminalise expressions or materials which were grossly offensive, indecent, obscene, of menacing character or sent to cause annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, hatred, ill will and needless anxiety. This portends that all such expressions or materials which hitherto constituted criminal acts are no longer criminal. The amendment has equally narrowed down the definition of the offence of cyber stalking which implies that some acts that previously constituted cyber stalking would no longer be considered as such.

Presently, only expressions or messages sent by means of computer systems or networks which is pornographic; or known to be false for the purpose of causing a breakdown of law and order, posing a threat to life or causing such message to be sent are now considered to amount to offence of cyber stalking by virtue of the amended Act. In other words, the ingredients that must be contained for a message to amount to cyber stalking are: either a pornographic message/content or, it is a false statement made with the purpose of causing a breakdown of law and order or posing a threat to life.

Despite this plain definition of cyber stalking, security agencies and highly placed individuals still deploy provisions of the section as a potent tool to intimidate and suppress free and uncomplimentary speeches or remarks which were not made for purpose of causing breakdown of laws or orders or posing a threat to life to anyone. Often, the criminal justice system is assailed and overburdened with varying pseudo charges of cyber stalking that would conveniently fit into civil defamation suits. The unfortunate trend in these pseudo charges is that citizens’ rights and liberties are grossly infringed and abused upon in the process of deploying instruments of State to assuage purely civil wrongs. In one of such cases in Nigeria, an affluent ‘nominal complainant’ was boasting publicly of returning the ‘accused person’ to prison at his volition.

The Future Trend:

Our courts should be strict in interpreting the provisions of the section against anyone relying on them to curtail right to free speech. As a way to protect citizens’ rights and liberties, bails should be granted on self recognizance or on most liberal terms in-favour of accused persons charged under the section. Justice stakeholders should up campaigns against abuse of rights though the use of the section as currently being witnessed. A push for a further amendment of the said section to further water down its effects so as to guide against future abuse. Finally, persons unsuccessfully prosecuted or abused under the section should seek for damages in civil actions for acts of malicious prosecutions. 

Obioma Ezenwobodo LL.M

Managing Partner Resolution Attorneys &

Executive Director Policy and Legislative Advocacy Network.

[email protected]

Samsung boss found not guilty in merger case

 Samsung Electronics Chairman Jay Y. Lee was found not guilty of accounting fraud and stock manipulation by a Seoul appeals court on Monday, in a ruling that could remove long-running legal risks that he has faced from criminal cases.

The Seoul High Court upheld the lower court’s ruling dismissing all the charges from a case involving a 2015 merger that prosecutors said was designed to cement Lee’s control of the tech giant.

The legal battles have been a distraction for Lee, who faced growing questions about his ability to lead Samsung Electronics – the world’s top memory chip and smartphone maker – as it grapples with growing competition and lacklustre stock prices.

“It took a long time. We hope with the latest ruling, the defendants would be able to focus on their work,” Lee’s lawyer Kim You-jin said after the ruling.

For nearly a decade, Lee has faced legal challenges, including those from the merger that paved the way for his succession after his father, Lee Kun-hee, had a heart attack in 2014 that left him in a coma.

A lower court last year cleared Lee of all charges related to the $8 billion merger in 2015 between two Samsung affiliates, Samsung C&T (028260.KS), opens new tab and Cheil Industries.

Prosecutors later appealed to the Seoul High Court, seeking a five-year jail term, citing a separate ruling in August that said Samsung BioLogics, an affiliate of Cheil Industries, breached accounting standards by overstating its assets to justify the merger.

The judge said even as the BioLogics accounting practices involved “inappropriate acts” such as the manipulation of documents, the outcomes reflected financial realities and were based on rational reasons and processes.

The court dismissed prosecutors’ claims that the merger caused financial losses to Samsung C&T shareholders.

Lee did not answer questions from reporters when he was leaving court on Monday.

He has denied wrongdoing, saying in court last November, “I never intended to deceive or damage investors for personal gain”.

It was not immediately clear whether the prosecution would appeal the decision to the Supreme Court.

Samsung shares closed down 2.7% following the ruling.

LENIENCY

A civic group condemned the court’s decision because it argued it showed leniency to Lee, who was charged with tightening his grip over his company at the expense of the country’s pension fund and other investors.

The People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy said the court disregarded other court rulings related to the merger case.

Lee served a combined 18 months in jail on bribery charges before he was released in 2021 as part of a scandal that led to massive protests and ultimately brought down then-President Park Geun-hye in 2017. Park also served a nearly five-year jail term.

In 2022, South Korea’s now impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol pardoned Lee, with the justice ministry saying the business leader was needed to help overcome a “national economic crisis”.

The controversial merger sparked a backlash from investors such as U.S. hedge fund Elliott and raised questions about the corporate governance of Korea’s family-owned conglomerates, which are often criticised for putting the interests of family members ahead of other shareholders.

In 2023, the South Korean government was ordered to pay around $108.5 million to Elliott, which sued it over the role played by the country’s pension fund in approving the merger.

Last year, the National Pension Service, formerly the biggest shareholder in Samsung C&T, filed a lawsuit against Lee, seeking damages from the merger that allegedly undervalued the key unit.

“This is positive news for Samsung, which has been having business difficulties,” said Park Ju-gun, head of corporate analysis firm Leaders Index.

“But the ruling will be a burden on Lee, who has to prove his management capability now that he is free from legal risks,” he said.

The conglomerate’s crown jewel Samsung Electronics warned on Friday of sluggish sales of its artificial intelligence chips in the current quarter.

Samsung Electronics has lost out to smaller competitor SK Hynix in supplying high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips to Nvidia’s AI graphics processing units and is seen missing much of the profits generated by the current AI boom.

Reuters

[Video] Reflecting on aftermath of the Berlin Conference 140 years after with Chidi Odinkalu, Patrick Gathara, others

The 1884–1885 Berlin Conference formalised what became the Scramble for and Partition of Africa. Arguably the most consequential multilateral event in Africa’s modern history, it remains insufficiently examined, and its lasting implications are often misunderstood.

To mark 140 years since this infamous diplomatic gathering, a collective of African intellectuals is launching a series of coordinated webinars and blog posts.

Through critical analysis and insightful discussions, they will explore the enduring structures of the multilateral system shaped by the conference—one that continues to disadvantage Africa to this day.

How Nigerian English got woman arrested for saying ‘drugs’ instead of ‘medications’ in UK

A Nigerian lady living in the United Kingdom (UK), identified as @shakels95, has shared her shocking experience of being arrested due to a simple misunderstanding of Nigerian jargon.

According to her, she had gone to a pharmacy to purchase medications for her husband when an innocent remark during a phone conversation led to her unexpected arrest.

While speaking to her husband on the phone, she casually used the word “drugs” instead of “medications,” unaware that people around her at the pharmacy misinterpreted it.

Moments later, the police arrived and took her into custody.

Recalling the incident in a TikTok video, she said, “I got arrested yesterday, last night, and got detained. Now, I am going home. Story time. So, yesterday, I went to the pharmacy to get some drugs for my husband.

“Then, when I got it finish, I was on call to say, ‘Ah, I got the drugs, I got two drugs for you. So, when I get home, when you use it, you are going to be strong.’

“Ok. Not knowing people closer to me were like, ‘drugs, drugs, drugs,’ but I wasn’t bothered ’cause I felt I didn’t do anything wrong. Before I knew it, the police came. When they came, they were like, ‘we heard there is drugs.’

“And I said what drugs? This (displaying the medications she got) was literally what I was referring to as drugs, Ibuprofen, for my husband because he wasn’t feeling well…”

Despite her attempts to explain the situation, the police refused to take her word for it.

She revealed that they detained her at the station and even searched her home in a bid to verify their claims.

Watch the video on X (formerly Twitter)

https://twitter.com/DAMIADENUGA/status/1886520383781691771

In a world of naked dresses, did one take it too far?

By Leah Dolan and Oscar Holland

It was arguably the biggest red carpet trend of 2024, dominating the Academy Awards, the Met Gala and everything else in between. The naked dress — embraced by celebrities ranging from Elle Fanning to Kim Kardashian, Doja Cat to Charlize Theron — has become an eyebrow-raising red carpet fixture. At last year’s Vanity Fair Oscars after party, we saw how nudity could be both angelic (as demonstrated by Jennifer Lawerence’s sheer, Fall-Winter 1996 Givenchy empire-waist dress hand-embroidered with clovers) and risqué (such as Charli XCX’s gauzy yellow nipple-baring gown, also made by Givenchy.)

But at Sunday’s Grammys, only one naked dress was turning heads. While most guests opted for muted palettes and pared-back styling amid tributes to victims of Los Angeles’ devastating wildfires, Bianca Censori took a different approach.

Censori arrived at the event alongside husband Kanye West — who now goes by Ye. If the Australian model’s long feather coat seemed uncharacteristically demure, given her risqué approach to dressing in public, it was because she didn’t plan on wearing it for long.

Within seconds of stopping for photos, the 30-year-old turned her back to the cameras and dropped her coat to reveal a barely-there sleeveless mini-dress made of transparent mesh that left nothing to the imagination.

Naked dresses come in all shapes, sizes and varying levels of exposure. This genre of frock centers about the power of suggestion — sometimes, the wearer is not revealing anything at all. In the late 1990s, Jean-Paul Gaultier made waves with his trompe-l’oeil patterns, images of the bare human form, which he printed onto blazers and dresses. It’s a print that has since been revived by designers such as Glenn Martens, whose acid-colored, heatmap-style pieces have been worn by Bella Hadid and A$AP Rocky.

Even some of the earliest examples of naked frocks — Mae West in the 1936 film “Go West, Young Man” or Carroll Baker’s Balmain dress worn while promoting “The Carpetbaggers” in 1964 — relied on expertly placed embroidery to give the impression of bare skin while avoiding any actual displays of nudity. Naked dresses, for all the fervent discussion, can be surprisingly modest.

But what is the logical conclusion of a culture that revels in the suggestion of disrobing? To some — particularly those like Censori, who has frequently appeared in public in revealing outfits, whether heading into a music studio almost naked beneath a see-through rain jacket or going to dinner in LA wearing little more than a bra and a pair of sheer tights — the leap from naked dress to plain naked might feel small.

On the Grammys red carpet, West, meanwhile, stood beside Censori in a black T-shirt and pants, expressionless behind a pair of sunglasses. Reports soon swirled that the couple were escorted out of the awards show. However, a source familiar with the sequence of events told CNN that was untrue. “He was not escorted out,” they said. “He’s a nominee. He walked the carpet and got in his car and left.” CNN has reached out to a representative for West for comment.

Soon after the appearance, the couple shared Polaroid photos of Censori modeling the look in posts on their respective social media accounts. In a since-deleted Instagram post, West described his wife’s outfit as “custom couture,” yet there was no artistry or clever draping to be admired, no titillating embroidery techniques like those worn by West and Baker. The blankness of Censori’s nudity begs the question: is it fashion, or just a body?

West has not confirmed whether he personally designed — or was involved in designing — Censori’s outfit, though social media users questioned the rapper’s role in his wife’s wardrobe choices. Others speculated that the model may have fallen afoul of California’s indecent exposure laws, which prohibit people from exposing their “naked body or genitals in front of anyone who could be annoyed or offended by it.”

When asked if Censori had breached California’s indecent exposure laws, a spokesperson for the Los Angeles Police Department told CNN via email that it had “not been made aware of any incident at the Grammys.” The Recording Academy and CBS did not immediately respond to CNN’s requests for comment.

While Censori has certainly contributed a notable moment in the history of the naked dress trend, she has transformed what is typically a suggestive whisper into a deafening shout.

Credit: CNN

Let us give the Nigerian Police the benefit of the doubt as they implement the motor vehicle insurance

By Tonye Clinton Jaja

As of May 2024, the Kingdom of Lesotho has no legislation for imposition of mandatory Third Party Insurance Policy.

According to a report: “In Lesotho, the roads have become a battleground for accountability, with drivers exploiting legal loopholes to evade responsibility after accidents. The absence of mandatory third-party motor insurance amplifies this issue, leaving innocent victims stranded with hefty repair bills and little recourse..”

Early January 2025, the driver that normally picks me to and fro my office at the Lesotho Law Reform Commission, came to pick me from work and I noticed that his car’s back bumper was falling. I enquired and he said that he had been involved in an accident. The person that caused the accident had no money immediately to fix it, so they agreed that it will only be by the end of the month when he receives his salary before he can pay for the repairs of the said car.

So Nigeria is doing well, at least better than other African countries wherein there is no mandatory implementation of third party motor vehicle insurance.

For those who may not know below are the details:

“Motor vehicle third-party insurance, also known as third-party liability insurance, protects the policyholder from legal claims if they cause damage or injury to a third party in an accident. It’s a legal requirement for some vehicles.

What it covers

  1. Property damage: Covers damage to other vehicles, property, or shops.
  2. Injury or death: Covers injury or death to other people.
  3. Legal proceedings: Covers related legal proceedings.
  4. Other expenses: Covers other expenses, such as hiring a replacement vehicle. Who it protects
    •Protects the policyholder from legal claims made by third parties
    •Protects the policyholder from financial losses caused by the accident. Who can take out a policy
    •The owner of the vehicle can take out a policy
    •A lawful possessor authorized by the owner can take out a policy”

It is against this background, that we must commend the Nigerian Police for its determination to enforce the mandatory third party motor vehicle insurance policy as from 1st February 2025.

This is the time for us to pour encomiums upon the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) for implementing this initiative!!

Congratulations are in order, this is the time to bestow POSITIVE accolades and sobriquets upon the IGP such as: “motor-loving IGP”; “INSURED IGP”; and “Third Party IGP” just to mention a few (never mind Sowore with his negative sobriquets: “(IL) Legal IGP”.

My only quibble is that majority of the Nigerian Police officers who are to implement this third party insurance policy have not themselves seen what it looks like!!

Shouldn’t there be an orientation for these police officers?

I remember a real life story that shows that the level of literacy amongst police officers is very, very low.

A police officer stopped my car along the way and asked for my vehicle particulars, it was a direct Belgium car, so I had not even gone to get a new number plate for it.

I was using the number plate from my former car on it.

So the number plate on the car and the chassis number on the vehicle particulars are different and any literate police officer could have detected it.

With confidence, I opened the pigeon hole and handed him the documents. After he had METICULOUSLY pored over the documents, one by one, for over five minutes.

The police officer smiled and returned all my vehicle documents to me and said: “OGA find us something make we use wash this your new car now”!!!

Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja,
Executive Director,
Nigerian Law Society (NLS).

A troubling case of organized crime involving inmates and corrupt prison officials

By Israel Joe

A young man was robbed on January 3rd 2025 in Benin by armed men who took valuable items and transferred a significant amount of money to a PalmPay account during the incident(4m)

The victim initially reported the crime to the Edo State Police Command, but no progress was made in identifying the assailants.

On hearing on the progreses made by our super cop CSP ALIYU SHABA in exposing the killers of Paulinus Okon at Otokutu, they decided to bring their case to Ekpan Police station.

The victim had conducted a geo analysis of the PalmPay account which pointed to the Udu axis, leading to further investigation.

The DPO arrested the account holder who confessed that her boyfriend own the account.

“I met him online and we started talking and one thing led to another, he started professing love and I accepted.

He told me he works offshore and have so many staff under him. He called me early January and told me that his phone fell into the River but expecting to receive some money and asked me to help him open a PalmPay account which I obliged. Later, he sent a lady to pick the ATM of the very account from me.

On the 4th of January, I got alert of 4m and told him. Later that day, he sent account numbers to me with instruction to pay some 600k, some 1.5m some 1m etc.

The DPO decided to run advanced analysis on the accounts and traced it to Warri correctional prison.

He immediately stormed the facility with his men and some of the arrested suspects. On arrival, one of the suspect ((girl ) sighted one of the star suspects but the prison officials refused to produce the young man except one who is serving a death sentence that also participated in the robbery.

So what happened is that, inmate left the prison custody and traveled to Benin city to rob and eventually returned.

All the robbers involved in this crime are serving inmates but because we have corrupt officials, they take bribes and allow the criminal inmates to go out for operations and return.

Implementing stricter security protocols in prisons to prevent inmates from leaving custody for criminal activities is crucial.