Home Blog Page 290

“Your Excellency, Don’t Abandon Us”, APC Chieftain Salako Amekunlooye writes open letter to President Tinubu

An Oyo-based entrepreneur, philanthropist, and youth mobilizer, Chief Salako Amekunlooye, in an open letter to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu GCFR on Tuesday, June 17, 2025, expressed disappointment over perceived neglect which he and other patriotic individuals and loyalists of the All Progressives Congress (APC) are experiencing after campaigning vigorously for the president’s victory in 2023, in Oyo State and across Nigeria.

Amekunlooye, in his letter, gave an account of how he travelled round the country, mobilising Nigerian youths in various higher institutions, trade unions/associations, religious institutions, as well as community development associations during the electioneering period in the country.

He also did not hold back his anger by complaining bitterly that he had been excluded from the dividends of party politics.

The APC chieftain further disclosed he found it appalling that none of his people was found worthy of being compensated with an appointment or post-election reward from the Presidency, adding that the Commander-in-Chief should purge his administration of sycophants who have refused to tell him the truth, an action which according to him could be inimical to the President’s reelection in 2027.

The letter also indicated that regardless of Amekunlooye’s displeasure, it would be disingenuous for him (Amekunlooye) to say he regretted throwing his weight behind President Tinubu in 2023, he however used the medium to appeal to the president to consider all what he (Amekunlooye) and other patriots sacrificed to ensure the party’s victory, saying they deserve to partake in the federal appointments.

His letter reads, “Your Excellency sir, my name is Chief Salako Amekunlooye one of your grassroots mobilizers in South West and also a member of South West Agenda for Asiwaju (SWAGA); a foremost political support group which did its best to make people across political divides record presidential victory for you in 2023.

“Sir, to our amazement in Oyo State and across Nigeria, those of us who campaigned vigorously for you have been neglected with utter disdain and contempt. We traveled round the country, mobilised Nigerian youths in various higher institutions, trade unions/associations, religious institutions, community development associations etc, but today we have been excluded from the dividend of party politics. None of us has been found worthy of being compensated with an appointment or post-election reward from the Presidency, this is very demoralizing and our foot soldiers are even finding it difficult to believe us.

“As it pleases God, today you are the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, for some of us who truly love you we would like to respectfully tell you to do self introspection, identify moles around you and as well purge your administration of sycophants who have refused to tell you the truth, an act which obviously could be inimical to your reelection in 2027.

“Although, regardless of my displeasure which should not be considered as an act of disloyalty or treachery, it would be disingenuous for me to say I regretted throwing my weight behind you in 2023, meanwhile I will rather use this open letter to appeal to you to consider all what some of us who are patriots sacrificed to ensure the party’s victory in 2023. We all deserve to partake in the federal appointments. I would have written to you in private but I know some overzealous individuals around you won’t let it get to you, hence this open letter became inevitable.

“Recall Your Excellency during the anniversary in commemoration of your two-year in office, I felicitated with you, because I believe in you and unequivocally passed a vote of confidence on you and reiterated the fact that I am solidly behind you and our great party (APC). Sir, it won’t be out of place to carry us along in all the political affairs in the states especially Oyo State. We are closer to the people at the grassroots, and we form the largest voting bloc in the secular world. Our demography should not be neglected. Since after the elections, Your Excellency may note that our efforts were never in any form appreciated or recognized.

“Nothing was given to us at any point in time, not even during the festive seasons. We waited and waited and waited to no avail, this is really sad. Your Excellency, permit me to reliably inform you that many of our boys went through a lot at the last election. We took a great risk sleeping on the grass in open spaces at almost every state during the electioneering period to ensure victory.

“A number of us sacrificed our personal belongings to support the campaign in our own little ways, some of us were physically attacked, some fell sick, some were involved in ghastly motor accidents, others were grossly bullied and disparaged on the social media, yet those inhuman treatments and challenges never distracted us from canvassing votes for the party. Your Excellency, these loyal party men and women have not been compensated for all their pains and sacrifices, we are feeling neglected.

“We would also want to respectfully draw the attention of His Excellency, our Father, the advocate of people’s empowerment to focus on advancing the country and bringing radical changes to the structure of governance. You also need to take steps that will change the misconception of north-south divide and engender national unity, inclusiveness, cohesion and development.

“As grassroots stakeholders who have the expertise to mobilise eligible voting demography in an election, we believe that the humanitarian sector requires diverse leadership to effectively address the complexities of social issues, especially those impacting vulnerable populations, including those who are committed and showing fidelity to your Renewed Hope Agenda, because we are the ones that could bring perspectives and experiences that can lead to more comprehensive and empathetic responses to humanitarian needs.

“We therefore urge you sir, to reconsider your appointments and to ensure that the appointments are extended to those who played pivotal roles in making your presidential dream a reality despite the stiff resistance pulled by the opposition parties and the filthy roles played by the fifth columnists.

“Your Excellency sir, for the umpteenth time, kindly please consider our clarion call to you. Listen to us, include us, and ensure that your key appointments reflect the richness of our nation’s diversity and as well make APC a veritable special purpose vehicle for political success and prosperity at all times and in every state.

“Nigerians are watching, the world is watching, but you are the one leading and we pray you will not fail.

“Thank you, Mr President.

“Your Compatriot and APC Chieftain,
“Chief Salako Amekunlooye,
“Ibadan, Oyo State.”

UN Fact-Finding Mission says Sudan war intensifying with devastating consequences for civilians

By Joy Ezeilo, SAN

Let us not forget about Sudan! The protection of the civilian population must be a priority, particularly in the context of humanitarian aid, as over 20 million people are facing famine and are in desperate need of assistance.

We presented our findings to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, Switzerland, emphasizing that the ongoing war in Sudan, which has now entered its third year, continues to devastate civilians, with women enduring alarming sexual violence and children being forcibly recruited as combatants.

Calls for an end to the conflict are unequivocal, but peace without justice remains an illusion. Accountability is not a luxury—it is the foundation of lasting peace. Without it, the cycle of violence persists. Justice must be prioritized in peace agreements, addressing the absence of accountability that has been recognized as a key driver of conflict in Sudan.

Prof. Joy Ngozi Ezeilo (SAN, OON).
Expert Member, UN Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Sudan.

Blood On The Benue: Weeping for Beleaguered Nigeria

By Prof. Mike Ozekhome, SAN

INTRODUCTION

Yelwata in Benue state has been drenched in blood. Last October, I launched 50 books at the same time in Abuja to mark my birthday. One of the books is titled “Blood on the Niger and Benue: Nigeria’s Grim Insecurity Situation”. Everything said in that book has just bee reenacted in Yelwata, Benue State.

In the quiet hours of Friday night, June 13, 2025, the farming village of Yelwata in Guma Local Government Area of Benue State lay cloaked in the familiar darkness of rural Nigeria. There was no forewarning, no alarm. Only sleep. Then, like a storm without thunder, horror descended.

Armed men, suspected to be killer Fulani terrorist herders, emerged from the shadows and set upon the defenceless community with brutal precision. For more than two hours, they maimed, slaughtered, burned and razed. By the time the sun rose on Saturday morning, the landscape had transformed into a grotesque tapestry of charred ruins, still-smouldering debris and lifeless bodies sprawled across crimson soil. Over 200 people were reportedly confirmed dead at the scene and the toll would rise in the days that followed, with some reports placing the number of victims at over 300. Among the dead were children, pregnant women and elderly farmers, civilians caught in the indiscriminate cruelty of a calculated massacre. I most unequivocally condemn this horror, this man’s inhumanity to man. It must never happen again. NEVER!

Witnesses recounted how petrol was doused on thatched homes before they were set ablaze. Whole families perished in their sleep, trapped by flames and collapsing roofs. The night echoed with the crackling of the burning and the screams of the wounded and the orphaned. Survivors stumbled through the darkness, scorched and bleeding, in search of refuge. At the Benue State University Teaching Hospital in Makurdi, doctors worked frantically, overwhelmed by the influx of casualties. Medical personnel issued urgent calls for blood donations as the wards filled with the critically injured, many clinging to life with little more than hope.

In a land where yam festivals should flourish, the earth has instead flourished with drunk blood. A serene and prosperous village, producing large quantity of food is now a ghost community, no thanks to deadly attacks by killer herdsmen, who pose as innocent cattle rearers.

A PEOPLE LEFT FOR DEAD: THE HUMAN TOLL

What occurred in Yelwata cannot be dismissed as a “clash,” nor cloaked in the diplomatic cowardice of euphemisms that seek to sanitize horror. This was not a skirmish. It was not a misunderstanding. It was a massacre! A premeditated act of mass violence, executed with recklessness and impunity against a defenceless civilian population, in total defiance of laws and moral conscience. The people of Yelwata have become mourners in their own homeland, dressed in black, forever gathering the bones of the innocent. The village has been painted over with the sorrow of the grieving and the brushstrokes of trauma.

Among the victims was the family of Michael Ajah, a survivor now left hollowed by grief. Ajah lost twenty members of his family in a single night! Eleven perished in one house. Eight were killed in another. The others died in the chaos, scattered across a village that now exists only in ashes. His stores were burnt. His home was destroyed. Standing barefoot in the ruins, he described how he escaped only with the clothes on his back. “This is the only thing that I have now,” he said. “There is nothing else with me.” Bature Bartholomew, Joseph Kwagh and countless others suffered a similar fate.

Apparently, prior threats had been made, as they often are, but villagers had grown used to such messages. The community had seen warnings before. And in the past, some security forces had pushed back similar threats. The villagers believed it would be the same this time. They likened it to the story of the crying wolf. They were wrong.

Let the world hear it: the peaceful people of Yelwata were not victims of chance. They were targeted. They were hunted. And they were massacred.

DEAFENING SILENCE AND DEADLY INACTION BY GOVERNMENT

The massacre in Yelwata is not just a story of blood and loss. It is a harrowing indictment of leadership failure, systemic neglect and institutional cowardice. In the face of rising tensions and repeated warnings, those entrusted with the security of Benue State and Nigeria at large chose silence. Security forces knew the fragility of peace in Yelwata. They were not blind to the pattern. From Guma to Agatu, Logo to Turan, the script has played out over and over: villages burnt, families erased, justice deferred. Yet, no preventive measures were taken. No fortified presence. No aerial surveillance. Only the eerie stillness of a nation too used to the scent of scorched earth.

When the killers struck again, it was not a surprise. It was an inevitability made possible by deafening silence and deadly inaction. The people of Benue have cried themselves hoarse, year after year, massacre after massacre. But their grief has been met with bureaucratic apathy and public relations condolences. Governor Hyacinth Alia’s response to the massacre was not merely inadequate; it was an affront. His delay in visiting the scene, his refusal to speak, tweet, or even mourn publicly until after President Tinubu’s very belated visit, has been interpreted not just as incompetence but as possible complicity. In the face of over 200 dead, the Governor offered the nation a figure of 59, thus inimizing the scale of bloodshed and insulting the graves of the murdered. What even if it were one? Instead of naming the perpetrators, he set up an investigative panel that tactfully avoided attributing blame, as if the truth was inconvenient, as if justice might provoke too much discomfort.

When President Tinubu finally arrived in Benue, the expectations of a grieving people were clear: solidarity, seriousness, swift action and restitution. What they received instead was a grotesque display of political theatre. Placards bearing the President’s image lined the roads. Schoolchildren, soaked and shivering, were forced to line the streets under a heavy downpour, waving soggy banners while mass graves still steamed in the earth nearby. What should have been a moment of solemnity turned into an unofficial 2027 re-election rally, a tasteless spectacle that traded the blood of Yelwata for photo ops. This was not condolence. This was campaign optics.

This playbook is not new. On New Year’s Day in 2017, over 200 people were slaughtered in Benue for resisting the destruction of their crops by cattle. On December 25th, 2024, as Christians marked the birth of Jesus Christ, suspected armed herders invaded Ityuluv, Tse Azege and Innyiev Ya in Kwande Local Government, killing eleven people mid-celebration. The images are consistent: corpses laid out under church roofs, burning homes, the wails of mothers who will never again hold their children. Yet from the corridors of power, the same recycled rhetoric flows: “We condemn,” “We are investigating,” “We urge calm.” But no arrests. No convictions. No justice. Just the thud of fresh bodies hitting the ground.

Even the words of comfort are now hollow. President Tinubu’s lamentations, “Enough is enough… perpetrators must be arrested… communities must dialogue”, ring with irony. Dialogue with whom? With the men who crept through the rain to burn babies alive? With those who hacked entire bloodlines to death because they were asked not to graze on people’s farmland? Dialogue implies equal grievance. This is not war. This is terrorism. Pure and simple. And to place dialogue and reconciliation above accountability is to trample on the memory of the dead.

Dr. Daudu Ayu of Yelwata captured the fury of a betrayed people when he denounced the President’s framing of the massacre as a “conflict between warring communities.” There is no parity here. The Fulani attackers were not defending; they were invading. Their aim was clear: seize ancestral lands, decimate indigenous populations and spread fear as a weapon of conquest. To reduce this to “herder-farmer clashes” is to excuse genocide with semantics.

The numbers are staggering. Since 2009, Nigeria has lost millions of lives to insurgency and herder-farmer violence. Benue alone has absorbed blow after blow, turning its farmlands into open graveyards. The government’s failure to act, its refusal to label this terrorism for what it is, has emboldened the killers. Why would they stop when they face no consequence? Why retreat when their path is cleared by political hesitation and legal paralysis?

President Tinubu’s muted outrage and calculated ambiguity do not typify exemplary leadership. They are avoidance wrapped in grammar. His failure to draw a red line, to name the aggressors, to galvanize decisive military action, makes his ambition for a second term in 2027 more than politically distasteful; it makes it morally flawed. How do you govern the living if you preside over the slaughter of the forgotten?

Each delayed response, each muted condemnation, adds one more body to the pile. For years, as statistics ballooned into genocidal proportions, the government sermonized from podiums while the fields of Benue ran red. This latest atrocity in Yelwata is not the beginning of the story, but it must be the final warning. Because if Nigeria cannot protect its citizens, if the Constitution’s promise of security and welfare is conditional on tribe, location, or silence, then it is not a nation; it is a lie, a scam.

Enough, please. Condolences do not resurrect the dead. Nor do photo-ops rebuild homes. The people of Yelwata need more than pity; they demand justice. And if this government cannot deliver it, then it must step aside for one that will. The land of yams is now the land of tombs. And history will remember who stood up and who stood back while it all burned.

TERROR HAS A NAME! CALL IT BY ITS NAME!!

According to Fr. Remigius Ihyula, a long-time witness to these cycles of violence and trauma in Benue State, this is a coordinated effort to wipe indigenous Christian communities off the map. “These Fulani militias are not just killing, they’re clearing land to claim it,” he stated in what should have been a national alarm bell. “And they’re being allowed to do it.”

The silence that follows such clarity is complicity. These attackers do not crawl out of caves. They cross state lines. Emboldened, equipped and unchallenged. From neighboring Nasarawa. Armed groups are said to find safe haven in Lafia, the state capital; yet successive Nasarawa governors have refused to act. Not out of ignorance, but from calculation. What kind of leadership turns its face away while death marches across its borders in open daylight? What kind of democracy tolerates this level of carnage and calls itself whole?

And when the few voices brave enough to speak the truth rise, they are met with digital disinformation and diversion. Fr. Ihyula has strongly condemned attempts to scapegoat the Tiv people, refuting online rumors that Tiv militias orchestrated the massacre. “There were no Tiv fighters involved,” he said. “This is a deliberate attempt to muddy the truth and shield the real perpetrators.” In a country already fracturing under the weight of ethno-religious mistrust, such deflections are more than cowardly. They are dangerous.

David Onyillokwu Idah of the International Human Rights Commission gave name to what many have been too afraid to utter. “This is what the Nazis did to the Jews,” he warned. “It’s ethnic cleansing, step by step. First, they displace them. Then they come back and finish the job.” This is not sensationalism. It is a fact pattern. Entire villages emptied. Men and women slaughtered. Children hacked to pieces. Homes razed. Crops destroyed. Entire communities transformed into ghost towns with only ashes left to speak.

And where is the state? Where is the machinery of justice, the constitutional promise of safety, dignity and equal protection? Every law in Nigeria, beginning with the Constitution, affirms that the right to life is sacred. That the state has an inviolable duty to protect it. Yet in Yelwata, life was treated like expendable surplus. Background casualty in the theater of statecraft. Amnesty International has catalogued the horrors, calling attention to the government’s complete failure to stem the tide of violence. “Gunmen have been on a killing spree with utter impunity,” it reported, warning that the mass displacement of farmers would have ripple effects on food security and economic stability. Their statement, clinical yet urgent, highlighted not only a humanitarian disaster but also the erosion of constitutional order. “Without immediate action, many more lives may be lost.” The question is: does the government intend to act, or merely wait until there are no more villages left to bury?

POLICY OR HUMANITY FAILURE

What occurred in Yelwata is not only a breach of human dignity. It is a breach of law, of the very fabric that claims to hold Nigeria together. These are not mere attacks; they are crimes against humanity. Under international law, under the Rome Statute to which Nigeria is a signatory, a systematic attack directed against a civilian population qualifies as such. Ethnic cleansing, political protection of armed militias and the use of displacement as a weapon, all point towards a dangerous descent Nigeria cannot afford. This is not just Yelwata’s burden. This is a national stain.

The issue is no longer one of mere policy failure. It is a test of our collective humanity. It is the measure of whether we, as a people, as a nation under law, believe rural Nigerian lives matter. Because every time a tactical unit is deployed after the massacre, every time officials show up after the mass burial, every time condolences are uttered while killers remain nameless and free—it tells the people of Yelwata that their blood is cheap. That their lives are expendable. That they are alone.

But the Constitution says otherwise. Section 14(2)(b) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended), declares the security and welfare of the people to be the primary purpose of government. Section 33 guarantees the right to life. Section 34 guarantees the right to dignity. Yet in the fields of Yelwata, once alive with farming, festivals and laughter, there is now only ash, silence and death. These rights, on paper, are being buried beside the people they were meant to protect.

If Nigeria still believes in its own laws, in its own humanity, then Yelwata must not be forgotten. Their stories must outlive the silence. Their names must echo louder than the rain that hid the footsteps of their killers.

This is no longer a rural crisis. It is a national reckoning. And history is already watching.

FROM CRIES TO JUSTICE: WHAT MUST NOW BE DONE

The carnage in Yelwata, like so many before it, leaves behind more than scorched homes and mass graves. It leaves a nation at a crossroads. In the place of swift justice, we have seen a cycle of condolences without consequence. In the place of leadership, we have seen silence, sluggishness and in some quarters, chilling complicity. And so, once again, a grieving people are left to ask: must our cries be louder than gunfire before we are heard? Must the soil drink more blood before the state will act?

The Northern Senators Forum, in a rare and firm voice, echoed the frustration of a people brutalized beyond measure. Chairing the statement, Senator Abdulaziz Musa Yar’adua called upon President Tinubu to ensure that his visit to the ashes of Yelwata would not dissolve into a photo-op footnote. “What the people of Benue and indeed all Nigerians, deserve is lasting protection, not repeated mourning.” In a nation where impunity now travels in convoys, that statement carries the weight of a challenge, not a courtesy.

But lip service will no longer suffice. Nigerians are not beggars at the gate of justice. They are constitutional citizens entitled to life, dignity and safety. Yet these rights have been violated repeatedly in Benue State, a region that has endured more than its fair share of bloodletting. Rural communities have become theatres of unrelenting terror. Ungoverned spaces stalked by militias, abandoned by the state and forgotten by a government too slow to respond, too quick to excuse. Yelwata is but a metaphor of what goes on across the length and breadth of Nigeria.

This moment demands more than mourning. It demands reckoning. The Constitution empowers the President to declare a state of emergency where there is a serious breakdown of public order and a clear and present danger is presented. That threshold has long been crossed. As Sir Ifeanyi Ejiofor, Esq, rightly noted, what we are witnessing is not communal misunderstanding. It is a transnational siege. Militants from across the Cameroon border continue to pour in, slaughtering with impunity, while the federal and state governments grope in the dark of denial.

And where was the governor, the supposed shepherd of the people? Governor Hyacinth Alia, elected to protect lives, stood muted while bodies were piled. The faint whisper of his voice came days after, long after the wails of the bereaved had risen to the heavens, long after Pope Leo XIV. It is not enough to wear a cassock; one must wield courage. It is not enough to call for prayer; one must demand justice. And if political office now weighs heavier than his conscience can bear, perhaps the pulpit is where he truly belongs. The hood does not make the monk after all.

RECOMMENDATIONS

  1. Immediate Deployment of Adequate Security Forces

The first and immediate line of intervention must be the swift deployment of sufficient, well-trained and fully-equipped security personnel to the affected communities. But this cannot be business as usual. Our military and other security agencies must stop operating in separated silos. What we need is joint intelligence gathering, joint operations and joint accountability. Anything less is a betrayal of the people already left exposed and bleeding.

  • Declaration of a State of Emergency in the Affected Areas
    The Federal Government must now invoke its constitutional mandate under Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution to declare a targeted state of emergency in the devastated areas. This should not be done as a mere political gimmick like in Rivers State but as a constitutional necessity. Such a declaration would allow for a unified, coordinated and rapid security response, free from the red tape that has too often cost lives. It would restore public order, unlock emergency relief and send a powerful message, not just to the perpetrators, but to the bereaved that Nigeria has not entirely lost its soul.
  • Establishment of a Judicial Commission of Inquiry

A robust, truly independent Judicial Commission of Inquiry must be established to thoroughly investigate these atrocities. It must dig deep; not just into who pulled the triggers, but into who enabled them, who funded them, who looked away. Justice must be more than ceremonial. It must be seen, heard and felt. Otherwise, we embolden the next set of killers.

  • Government Assistance to Victims and Survivors

The dead must not be buried with the silence of the state. Survivors must not be left to wander with grief as their only companion. The government must offer immediate and sustained relief, medical care, shelter, financial assistance, food, clothes, relocation support and psychosocial services. Compassion must walk hand in hand with justice. Not as charity, but as a right.

  • Tackling the Root Causes: Annexation and Occupation by the Fulani Herders; Poverty, Unemployment and Illiteracy

Peace is not built on military boots alone. It is built on dignity of the human person; opportunity and hope. The structural causes of this continuous violence must be tackled. First, the government must extirpate this sense of irredentist annexation and occupation of the land of the Natives all over Nigeria by fully armed Fulani herders. The grinding poverty, monumental unemployment and educational exclusion must be confronted and dealt with boldly. These are not background issues; they are the fuel that ignite the crises. A country that fails to invest in its people will eventually have to bury them.

  • Inclusive Dialogue with Traditional Rulers and Community Leaders
    Security is not the exclusive preserve of the state. It must be co-owned by the people. Traditional rulers, faith-based leaders, youth groups and local stakeholders must be at the table, not as spectators but as partners. Their voices carry legitimacy and their cooperation carries weight. The road to peace must pass through the hearts of the people who live there.

Nigeria must abandon the lie that some lives are worth more than others. Whether in Lagos or Yelwata, the right to life is not negotiable.

Justice must rise. Not as a whisper but as a national roar. For each charred body in Yelwata cries out; not for pity, but for prosecution. Not for platitudes, but for policy. Not for remembrance, but for reform. Let the government stop sermonizing and start securing. Let the Presidency remember that it was elected to protect, not to pontificate. And let the nation rise to say: enough. Not one more grave before we act. Not one more child buried before we move.

IF NOT NOW, WHEN?

I have decried this nightmare too many times. My voice is now hoarse from screaming into the void. And if I, one far removed from; a mere citizen and a conscience with pen and protest feel this ravaged, this worn, then what must be the state of mind of the grieving people of Yelwata, of Benue? What must it be to live in constant dread, to bury child after child, to rebuild only for fire to raze it again?

The people of Benue State deserve better. They deserve a government that does not look away, a system that does not delay and a nation that does not devalue their suffering. The Yelwata massacre was not just a tragic event. It was an indictment. A blistering exposure of governance gone cold and a security architecture collapsed under the weight of its own rot. It laid bare the double standards that govern Nigerian responses to violence: swifter when it affects the elite and sluggish, if not silent, when it happens in the farmlands of the forgotten.

This was not just a failure of one government. It was the betrayal of institutions. A brutal failure by Governor Hyacinth Alia, who watched from within the state without uttering a word while the ashes of his constituents cooled. A glaring failure by the Tinubu administration, that merely sent condolences before justice and optics before concrete action. A catastrophic failure by the Nigerian state itself, whose primary constitutional duty, to protect life and property, was abandoned the moment the first gunshots rang out in Yelwata.

This massacre cannot be allowed to happen again. Not under any guise. Not cloaked in politics. Not silenced by power. Not dulled by time.

We end not in quiet despair, but in thunderous resolve. This grief will not make us mute. This pain will not make us passive. The dead of Yelwata are not numbers to scroll past—they are names, families, futures. They are stories etched into our conscience.

And so we write and will monitor the implementation of our recommendations.

We will not stop until the soil of Yelwata no longer tastes of blood, but of justice. Until the lives lost become the spark for national reckoning. Until silence is replaced by outrage and condolences give way to action.

The views expressed by contributors are strictly personal and not of Law & Society Magazine.

Female bodybuilding star dubbed ‘She Hulk’ mowed down by husband who later kills himself with a knife

  • Watch video of Chief Mrs Victoria Awomolo, SAN, warning, “if it’s not working out, leave, don’t die!

A professional female bodybuilder was beaten to death with a hammer at her luxury Costa del Sol home before her muscleman husband killed himself using a knife, police believe.

Colombian bodybuilding champion Zunilda Hoyos Mendez, who also went by the name Amy, was found dead yesterday afternoon after detectives went to the property on an upmarket residential estate in the popular Spanish resort of Fuengirola.

The body of her partner, named as 46-year-old Jarrod Gelling, was found in a bathroom with what police have described in an initial statement as ‘apparent self-inflicted stab wounds.’

Zunilda, who was dubbed Colombian She-Hulk, had been missing since Saturday after flying to the Costa del Sol from Dubai, where the couple reportedly spent much of their time. 

Her relatives described Jarrod overnight as ‘aggressive’ and said they believe he could have lashed out after she told him she wanted a divorce.

Zunilda’s niece Yuleydis told Malaga-based newspaper Sur her aunt was going to help nurse Jarrod after a knee operation before travelling to Portugal for a competition. 

After, she planned to head back to Colombia alone after making the decision to divorce him.

‘For my aunt it was the last trip, a goodbye’, niece Yuleydis said.

Click here to continue reading.

Watch the video below.

Negotiating With The Devil: A nation that bows before blood

By Khaleed Yazeed

What happened today in Danmusa, Katsina State, was not a peace dialogue, it was not reconciliation, it was a negotiation with terror. A surrender of the Nigerian state. A betrayal signed in silence, sealed with shame, and witnessed by soldiers.

Ado Aleru, a name that echoes through the valleys of Zamfara, Sokoto, and Katsina as a butcher, a bandit, a destroyer of villages, sat like a king. Surrounded by military personnel, community leaders, and traditional rulers, he spoke not from a place of regret, but of power. Of pride.

He told us: As long as you keep calling us terrorists, we will keep acting like terrorists. And no one objected. No one stood up.

No soldier raised a weapon. No official raised their voice. The only thing that was raised… was a terrorist’s confidence.

Ado Aleru was not arrested… He was respected… He wasn’t interrogated… He was invited… He wasn’t hidden in a cave.

He was welcomed like a guest of honor, in the very state where blood still stains the soil from the horrors he and his men unleashed.

Tell me: What kind of country negotiates with men who burn children in their sleep? What kind of army stands still while death gives a speech?

This is not just a national disgrace, it is the collapse of every moral wall holding this country together.

To the Nigerian government:

You did not just negotiate with terror. You empowered it. You legitimized it. You gave it a face. A voice. A stage. And the people watched in shock, in silence, in sorrow.

How do you explain to grieving mothers that their sons’ killers now sit in peace talks?

How do you face a country that’s bleeding from the North, cracking in the South, and say, “We are in control”?

You are not in control. You’re lier’s. Terrorists are controlling us, because, they are your political weapons.

To the Nigerian military:

Where was your honor?

Where was the courage you swore to wear in your uniforms?

You raided campuses to arrest students who tweet. You stormed villages to harass civilians who refuse to pay bribes. But a warlord sits comfortably in Katsina, and all your guns stay quiet?

Shame is too gentle a word. This is a betrayal of the Nigerian people.

And to the South:

You watched this too.

You saw a terrorist speak freely in the heart of Northern Nigeria. You saw a government clap with one hand and cover its eyes with the other. So when you say, We want to leave Nigeria, who can blame you?

When you see the North cradle its killers, who can argue with your fears?

This is how a nation dies, not by bullets, but by deals made in daylight. Not behind closed doors, but in open fields where bandits are treated like kings and justice is left gasping for breath.

This is a war for the soul of Nigeria.

And right now, we are losing.

We are losing our dignity.

We are losing our unity.

We are losing our humanity.

Because the message is clear: If you want to be heard in Nigeria, pick up a gun. If you want to be respected, spill blood.

Peaceful citizens are ignored.

Terrorists are negotiated with.

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, where are you?

Your silence is louder than the gunshots we hear at night.

This happened in Katsina, a land drenched in loyalty, soaked in blood, and now humiliated by its own protectors.

If you have any shred of leadership left, act.

If not for the North, then for the fragile future of this country.

Because one day, the same terrorists you coddle today will sit at your table tomorrow, not as enemies, but as equal partners.

And Nigeria, as we know it, will no longer exist.

We will not forgive this.

We will not forget this.

And we will not be silent.

The views expressed by contributors are strictly personal and not of Law & Society Magazine.

Tears as Joseph Otteh, Access To Justice (A2J ) founder is buried in Okporo, Orlu LGA, Imo State

It was grief and a free flow of tears as Joseph Otteh, the founder of Access To Justice (A2J), who passed away in Lagos on 28 March 2025, was buried on Friday, 20 June 2025, in his hometown, Okporo, in Orlu LGA, Imo State.

Otteh left behind a wife, Ogechi, three children, Chidimso, Samantha, Ikechi, and an elderly mum.

Samantha (2nd daughter); Chidimso (1st daughter); Ogechi (Wife); Ikechi (Son)

Joseph Otteh and Access To Justice (A2J ) were the first winners of the Gani Fawehinmi Award for Social Justice and Human Rights, 2010, which was instituted by the Nigerian Bar Association (NB) through its Human Rights Institute.

He was a Global Public Service Scholar at NYU and received a Master’s degree in law from both the University of Lagos and New York University.

He also served as a Visiting Researcher at the Danish Centre for Human Rights.

Otteh authored Fading Lights of Justice and Litigating in the Public Interest.

He contributed extensively to legal scholarship, consulting for institutions such as the British Government’s J4A Programme, the Open Society Initiative for West Africa (OSIWA), the Nigerian Bar Association, the European Union’s Rule of Law and Anti-Corruption Programme (RoLAC), and the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ).

Watch the video below.

Group sues Tinubu, AGF, NASS over appointment of Rivers electoral officers

An Abuja-based advocacy group, Center for Reform and Public Advocacy, has dragged President Bola Tinubu, Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, and the National Assembly before the Federal High Court in Abuja, challenging their powers to appoint officers for the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC).

The civil rights group, in a suit marked FHC/ABJ/CR /1196/2025, is praying the court to set aside the purported nominations done by the President and the approval by the Senate on the grounds that they lacked constitutional powers to appoint officials for the state electoral body.

According to the group in the suit filed on its behalf by an Abuja based lawyer, Mr Kalu Kalu Agu, only the Governor of Rivers State is constitutionally empowered to appoint chairman and members for the RSIEC.

In their originating Summons, the plaintiff prayed the court to determine whether by virtue of the combined effects of Sections 11(4), 197, 198, 199 and 201, of the 1999 Constitution, President Tinubu has powers to seek approval of the Senate to constitute an electoral committee for Rivers State.

Upon the determination of the constitutional provisions in the affirmative, the rights group wants the court to expressly declare that it is the exclusive preserve of the Governor of Rivers State and not any President, to appoint and remove a chairman and six members of the state electoral committee.

The body also asked the court to declare that Tinubu lacked the power to seek approval of the National Assembly for the appointment of a chairman and members for RSIEC and that the Senate also lacked powers to accept any nomination from the President for the purpose of constituting electoral committee for Rivers State.

Besides, the group applied for an order of the court setting aside the list of nominees for the chairmanship and membership of RSIEC sent to the Senate by Tinubu for being unconstitutional, null and void.

They also sought an order of perpetual injunction restraining the AGF, the President and the National Assembly from taking part in any proceeding for the appointment and approval of nominees for RSIEC.

Besides, the group wants the resolution of the Senate approving Tinubu’s nominees for RSIEC to be set aside on the ground of illegality.

In a 30-paragraph affidavit in support of the originating summons, the advocacy group claimed to be a non-profit, pro-democracy, human rights, anti-corruption and public interest advocacy organization registered in Nigeria.

It claimed that on March 18, 2025, Tinubu on the advice of the AGF declared a state of emergency in Rivers State and that the emergency led to the removal of the lawfully elected governor.

The affidavit deposed to by one Emmanuella Alisi said that as a follow up to the alleged unlawful emergency rule, President Tinubu, acting on the advice of the AGF, sent a list of nominees to the Senate to be confirmed we members of the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission.

He said that the plaintiff quickly wrote to the AGF and Senate President to halt the process of approving the said nominees on the ground of illegality.

The affidavit said that the Rivers governor had dully constituted the Electoral Commission that has been discharging its statutory functions among which was the conduct of local government election for the state on October 5, 2024.

Besides, the affidavit said that the tenure of the Electoral Commission legally constituted by the governor has not expired and as such cannot be unlawfully removed or dissolved especially when members have not resigned.

The affidavit said that since the defendants took oath to protect the country’s Constitution as the Supreme Law, the court should compel them to uphold the provisions of the Constitution in the interest of justice.

Apart from the AGF, Tinubu and the National Assembly, the other defendants are Governor of Rivers, Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission and Justice Adolphus Enebeli, Chairman of RSIEC.

No date has been fixed for the hearing of the action.

CSO knocks NNPCL as board members gear up to fly to Rwanda in 5 private jets

The Board of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation Limited and its leadership are preparing to travel to Kigali, Rwanda, this Friday on five private jets.

Already, the development is said to be causing ripples and apprehension in NNPCL

Sources said their goal is to conduct a Board Retreat at an exclusive resort in the Kigali Hills.

A highly placed insider source disclosed that the Board, led by Musa Kida, appears to be unaware of the distress caused to Nigeria by the poor performance of the NNPCL over the years.

Reacting to the development, the Executive Director of Nigerian Transparency Initiative (NTI), Bello Onoja, described it as the height of insensitivity to the plight of the public.

He said, “Instead of addressing serious allegations brought forth by the Nigerian Senate regarding its audited accounts, they are embarking on political pilgrimage linked with 2027 Presidency.

“Rather than concentrate on improving NNPCL, this so-called Board of Experts appears more focused on enjoying their own privileges. It is a disappointing situation for Nigeria. What is happening to our country? Indeed, ‘There Was A Country’, according to Chinua Achebe.

“Our determination to end the menace of political cankerworms and economic scavengers is a battle of No Retreat, No Surrender.”

Court of Appeal nullifies GTBank’s foreclosure of Abiola’s son’s N30bn property over forged mortgage deed

The Lagos division of the Court of Appeal has overturned a 2014 judgment of the Federal High Court in a case between RCN Networks Ltd and Guaranty Trust Bank PLC.

The Federal High Court’s ruling in 2014 led to the foreclosure by GTBank of a 44-room mansion valued at N30 billion owned by Agboola Abiola, one of the sons of the late MKO Abiola.

Agboola and RCN Networks Ltd challenged the judgment at the Court of Appeal in CA/L/888/2014.

The main contentions were that the company, as a borrower, signed a deed of tripartite legal mortgage alongside GTB, the respondent.

However, the second appellant, Agboola, denied signing the legal document, claiming instead that the execution page bearing his signature was from a different document and was fraudulently attached to the deed of tripartite legal mortgage to include his assets as part of the loan security.

Delivering judgment on Wednesday, a three-member panel of the appellate court unanimously held that the trial court had ignored glaring discrepancies in the tripartite deed of legal mortgage registered by the bank at the Lagos state land registry against the said property.

The appellate court held that the discrepancies made the tripartite legal mortgage document deficient and incapable of conferring any legal rights on the bank to foreclose on the property.

“Now the lower court, for some reason, elected to gloss over these alleged alterations and amendments, which even the police alluded to, and proceeded to restrict itself to the interpretation of clause 6 of the deed,” Paul Bassi, the lead justice, held.

“Where the authenticity of the deed or document as a whole is called into question, can the court interpret this document and make a pronouncement of the rights of the parties? I think not.

“It is incumbent on the court to be satisfied that the deed or document sought to be interpreted is accepted by the parties as that creating the rights and obligations of the parties.

“Again, a court cannot proceed to make a determination of rights of parties on a contested deed or document, especially one tainted with allegations of fraud or forgery. The court cannot fill in the gaps in establishing authenticity or the fraud by itself. That would be proceeding on a faulty premise.

“At this point, the obvious conclusion is that the lower court was in error to have determined the rights of the parties on a contentious document that was allegedly a forgery. This court cannot endorse the decision of the lower court on this basis. I therefore resolve this issue in favour of the appellants.

“I therefore allow the appeal and set aside the judgement of the federal high court, Lagos division delivered on the 20th day of June 2014, in suit no: FHC/L/CS/876/2013.”

The appellant was represented by Charles Adeogun-Phillips, while the respondent was represented by Norrison Quakers.

Source: TheCable

Sokoto Government declares readiness to dialogue with bandits, as IPOB condemns FG’s linking of Kanu with #EndSARS 

The government of Sokoto State has made known its readiness to enter into dialogue with bandits who are ready to lay down their arms and embrace peace.

This is even as the Indigenous People of Biafra has described the ongoing trial of its leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu and what transpired in court on Thursday as a full-blown indictment on Nigeria’s judicial system and exposure of the Federal Government’s “reckless abuse” of judicial processes.

Sokoto State government’s position was made known by Ahmed Usman, the Special Adviser to Governor Ahmed Aliyu on Security Matters, during a media briefing.

He highlighted the importance of negotiation as a strategic path to ending the ongoing insecurity in the state.

“We wholeheartedly welcome any development that promotes peace and security in our region,” Usman stated.

“It’s important to recognise that, historically, many conflicts have ended not solely through force but through dialogue.

“In Sokoto, we’re open to engaging in negotiations with bandits who are genuinely willing to surrender and embrace peace.”

Usman also extended appreciation to President Bola Tinubu, the service chiefs, security commanders, and frontline personnel for their relentless efforts in maintaining security in the region.

“Their sacrifices are deeply appreciated. May Allah bless the souls of our fallen heroes and grant comfort to their families,” he said.

In addition, the state government welcomed the federal government’s plan to deploy forest guards as part of broader efforts to combat insecurity.

Usman stressed that the integrity of the recruitment process and the trust of local communities would be critical to the success of the initiative.

In a statement released on Friday, the Spokesman for the pro-Biafran group, Emma Powerful, said what transpired at the Federal High Court in Abuja on Thursday exposed the Federal Government’s last gasp effort to blame Kanu for the 2020 #EndSARS protests.

Powerful said it is high time the world took urgent and critical notice of the Federal Government’s “falsehoods” and ongoing “sham” trial of the pro-Biafran leader before Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court, Abuja, insisting that the trial is a conspiracy built on falsehoods and media manipulations.

He said, “Thursday, June 19, 2025, marks a pivotal moment in a case that has from inception, been sustained by a toxic cocktail of deceit, media manipulation, evidentiary fraud, and a calculated campaign to criminalise self-determination.

“Following the conclusion of cross-examination, the prosecution led by Chief Awomolo, SAN, has closed its case. In response, the defence team led by the eminent Chief Kanu Agabi, SAN indicated his readiness to file a ‘No-Case Submission’, citing the total failure of the prosecution to establish any shred of evidence linking Mazi Nnamdi Kanu to any offence known to law, much less terrorism.

“As a result, Justice Omotosho has adjourned the case to July 18, 2025 for the adoption of final written addresses.

“But let it be stated with absolute clarity: what transpired in court yesterday was not merely a defeat for the government—it is a full-blown indictment of the Nigerian state’s reckless abuse of the judicial process.

“Despite the courtroom being governed by restrictive reporting rules, it is a matter of public record that the last prosecution witness—PW5-EEE, a supposed intelligence officer—collapsed under the weight of cross-examination by the very excellent Dr Onyechi Ikpeazu, SAN. The witness was evasive, contradictory, and pathetically unprepared.

“So damning was his performance that even the prosecution’s lead counsel, Awomolo, SAN, had to caution him in open court. Justice Omotosho was visibly exasperated and at several points compelled the witness to answer basic ‘yes or no’ questions he was deliberately evading.

“The government’s last gasp effort at propping up this collapsed case was a laughable attempt to blame Mazi Nnamdi Kanu for the #EndSARS protests—a grassroots youth-led movement that began in Ughelli, Delta State.

“According to PW5-EEE, the nationwide protest against police brutality was incited by Kanu’s broadcasts, and the government now claims—absurdly—that he was its mastermind. This desperate narrative is not just intellectually bankrupt; it is morally obscene.”

Powerful said among the disturbing revelations in court was the no evidence of the 200 security operatives allegedly killed in the South-East was presented, adding that no names, no ranks, no stations and no death certificates was presented for prove.

“The assessment report purportedly tying IPOB to security breaches was not even produced in 2020 when these incidents supposedly happened. It was fabricated only this month—June 2025, a staggering admission of falsification that should provoke outrage from every decent human being.

“The autopsy reports and coroner’s certificates were unsigned, unverifiable and riddled with forgeries. The unnamed persons who ‘discovered’ these phantom bodies were conveniently absent from the entire prosecution case. This is not law—it is fiction.

“We are forced to ask: Why has the Nigerian press continued to ignore these courtroom bombshells? Why are media houses quick to publish every accusation made by the DSS or the prosecution, yet remain mute when those very accusations crumble under scrutiny in open court?

“We encourage every Nigerian and members of the international community to file applications for Certified True Copies of the daily proceedings and see for themselves the shocking collapse of the Federal Government’s case.

“Kanu is a man of peace. He is not on trial for violence. He is on trial for daring to speak truth to power and for demanding justice for a long-oppressed people. The government’s case against him is not just weak—it is a monument to state-sponsored falsehood.

“History will record those who stood by while injustice was clothed in the garments of legality. It will also remember those who rose to expose it,” the statement added.

TIPS