Home Blog Page 1376

Southern Kaduna Killings: Military Takes Over Flash Points.

In a bid to curb the lingering attacks an killing in southern Kaduna, the Military has deployed special operation forces towards securing the lives and properties in the area. 


The special Task Force, Operation Safe Heaven (OPSH), maintaining peace in Pleateau, Bauchi as well as part of the southern Kaduna were deployed to the joint operations area covering the various flash points. 

Coordinator Defence Media Operations, Major General John Enenche, who disclosed this during the weekly news conference in Abuja, explained that the move was expected to achieve the desired results with the provision of credible and actionable intelligence specifically from the primary sources.

He, however, to this end he urged residents in the area not to panic but rather cooperate with the security agencies by availing them the required information that would be useful to achieve the collective objective of curbing the criminal activities from the area.


Also speaking on the warning earlier sounded by the United States of America African Command (US AFRICOM) on the infiltration of the Islamic state in Syria (ISIS) and Al-Qaeda in some parts of the country, Enenche said the security agencies were ahead of the evolving security challenges, adding that the Forces were not taking the warning signals for granted. 

“sequel to the warning by US AFRICOM that extremists have begun deploying several strategies to silently re-establish themselves across some regions in Africa including the West Africa sub-region, the Armed Forces of Nigeria and all the relevant security agencies is leaving nothing to chance.

“Consequently, actions in place in this regard are being reviewed to handle this all-important intelligence appropriately. I am directed to assure the general public that this is not a one-off but continuous effort as it were to ensure that the security agencies are ahead of this evolving security challenge”. 

On operations in the North West Zone of the country, the Coordinator said troops of Operation Hadarin Daji have continued the aggressive clearance operations in the entire zone. 


 He said “for the past one month, we have witnessed downward trend in the activities of armed bandits and cattle rustlers in the general areas of Katsina, Kebbi, Zamfara, Sokoto and adjoining states.


“Most of these criminal elements have been decimated. Gradually there is restoration of human activities in the zone. Farmers have returned to their farms while other economic activities have picked up across the zone. 


“The troops have continued to dominate the general area with clearance patrols, aggressive fighting patrols and confidence-building patrols. Enenche added. 


The Coordinator also spoke on the alleged report that troops deployed to fight insurgency in Baga areas of Borno State were dealing in livestock and farming and dismissed the allegations saying that “in line with military procedures, it was investigated and found to be baseless”

HATE SPEECH AND FAKE NEWS ARE NOT OFFENCES IN NIGERIA

Following the presentation of the Reviewed version of the 6th Edition of the National Broadcasting Code, the media has been awash with the news of increase in the penalty for hate speech and or fake news from five hundred thousand Naira to five million Naira only. It is interesting that no media practitioner or lawyer has taken the time to ask a pertinent question, is there any offence in the Laws of Nigeria known as hate speech or fake news? 

There are no offences or crimes in Nigeria known as, called, or referred to as either hate speech, and fake news. The Nigerian Broadcasting Commission (NBC) cannot create either the offence or crime of fake news or hate speech.

The combined reading of the powers of Commission in Section 2 of the Nigerian Broadcasting Commission Act, to regulate and control the broadcasting industry, establish and disseminate a national broadcasting code and set standards with regard to the contents and quality of materials for broadcast; monitoring broadcasting for harmful emission, interference, and illegal broadcasting; and determining and applying sanctions including revocation of license of defaulting stations which do not operate in accordance with the broadcast code and in the public interest, still does not give it any statutory power or authority to create an Offence through the Broadcasting Code.

There is no provision for payment of financial penalties in the Act. The power to impose a financial penalty can only be given to the NBC by the Law. The NBC cannot give itself the power to create offences and penalties. That power must be specifically conferred on the NBC, which the NBC Act has not. The NBC, therefore, has no power to make subordinate or subsidiary legislation. What the NBC has done in the Code is a usurpation of legislative powers of the National Assembly.

The non-inclusion of fines and penalties as sources of income or revenue for the Commission is evidence that the Act did not mean to impose financial penalties. The identified sources of funding of the Commission are (a) such percentage of fees and levy to be charged by the Commission on the annual income of licensed broadcasting stations owned, established or operated by private individual(s), Federal State or local government; (b) such moneys as may, from time to time, be lent or granted to the Commission by the Government of the Federation or of a State; (c) all moneys raised for the purposes of the Commission by way of gifts, loans, grants-in-aid, testamentary disposition or otherwise; (d) all other assets that may, from time to time, accrue to the Commission. Nowhere in the Act does penalties from fines paid by licensees and Broadcast Stations constitute a source of revenue for the Commission. It appears that the only mention of financial penalties in the Act is in the power of the NBC to prescribe an appropriate fee payable for licenses.

The NBC Act states clearly that the NBC has no power to institute and carry on criminal proceedings for any offence, whether relating to a matter in relation to which they have functions.

In the absence of any provision in the NBC Act, the NBC cannot make subsidiary legislation. The NBC cannot create an offence in the Broadcasting Code, wherein it is the accuser, prosecutor, judge, and executor. If the NBC’s Broadcast Code turned “Penal Code” is allowed to stand, then we would have a Law that discriminates to the extent that what is hate speech and fake news on Radio and Television is not an offence in the print media world of newspapers and magazines.

The attempt by NBC to create a non-existing offence of hate speech to strangulate free speech and free media is the exercise of impunity in the extreme. Our Constitution states in unequivocal words that “ … a person shall not be convicted of a criminal offence unless that offence is defined and the penalty, therefore, is prescribed in a written law …”

Hon. Nimi Walson-Jack
Executive Director
Public Education Works Initiative

Wednesday, 12 August 2020.

Businessday Apologises to Osinbajo Over False Allegation on TSA Funds

Reading Time: 2 minutes

SWITZERLAND, AUGUST 14 – Businessday newspaper has apologised to Vice President Yemi Osinbajo over the publication of a report wrongly alleging his involvement in an illegal N10bn withdrawal from the Treasury Single Account (TSA).

In a statement published on its online platform, Businessday said that the story failed to meet its editorial standards and acknowledged that it was baseless, unfounded and unsupported by any factual substance.

“We hereby convey our sincere, profound and unstinted apology for allowing our newspaper to be used as a platform by which the said news item was conveyed. The said publication is highly regretted by us and we urge our esteemed readers and the general public not to ascribe or attach our reputation for disseminating accurate information that we expect the public to trust to it,” the statement partly reads.

The report was also published by The Sun newspaper, which the vice president has threatened to sue to court if it does not retract the story and tender an apology within seven days.

Read the full statement below:

“On 9th August 2020, businessday.ng published a story titled “Ex APC spokesman asks Buhari to probe Osinbajo, AuGF over alleged N10bn withdrawal from TSA.”

“That story failed to meet the editorial standards of Business Day Newspaper, as we have since discovered that the story was baseless, unfounded and unsupported by any factual substance.

“We have already disabled the links to the story and hereby retract it completely and unreservedly.

“Business Day apologises to His Excellency, Professor Yemi Osinbajo SAN, the Vice President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, his family, friends, colleagues and well-wishers for the unwarranted inconvenience and embarrassment the publication has occasioned.

“We hold the Vice President in very high esteem and appreciate his enormous worthy and enviable achievements in the private sector as a respected Professor of Law – of multiple decades standing and Senior Advocate of Nigeria, amongst others; and the worthy and enviable strides he has made in public service as the former Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice Lagos and presently Vice President of Nigeria.

“We hereby convey our sincere, profound and unstinted apology for allowing our newspaper to be used as a platform by which the said news item was conveyed. The said publication is highly regretted by us and we urge our esteemed readers and the general public not to ascribe or attach our reputation for disseminating accurate information that we expect the public to trust to it.

“A letter conveying our unreserved apology has since been sent to the Vice President.”

WOW !!!: Lai Mohammed Wrote 6th Code Alone, We Have No Hands In It – NBC Board Distances Self

The Board of the National Broadcasting Commission has distanced itself from the six edition of the NBC code announced by the commission in June.
The Board said the new broadcasting code was singlehandedly reviewed by the Minister of Information and Culture, Alhaji Lai Mohammed without consulting any member of the Board.


Ikra Bilbis, the Chairman of the NBC Board disclosed this on Thursday, August 13, 2020, during a press conference in Abuja.

Bilbis said the procedure for the NBC code review, which usually involves staff of the NBC, former DGs, retired Directors and all other relevant stakeholders in broadcasting was flouted by the minister.

He said, “The minister’s version of the revised code does not meet any known criteria of due process and inclusiveness of stakeholders.”

Bilbis further said that Mohammed sidelined the Broadcasting Organisations of Nigeria, Independent Broadcast Association of Nigeria, private media outfits, broadcasters, notable media intellectuals, communication experts, digital team and the academia and singlehandedly carried out the review.

According to the Board Chairman, the sixth edition of the NBC code was borne out of observations made by members of the Federal Executive Council to Mohammed at one of their meetings in 2019.

The FEC members were said to have expressed worry about the divisive broadcasts engaged in by some broadcast media before, during and after the 2019 general elections, and also urged the NBC to strengthen its operations to avert future recurrence.

Bilbis said instead of directing appropriate authorities to act on the observation, the minister went ahead to review the broadcasting code all alone.

He said, “This noble observation of Mr. President was unfortunately misunderstood by the minister of information. Instead of studying and following the law, relevant rules and regulations, and direct the appropriate authorities as stipulated by the law to act on, he erroneously embarked on the review alone.

“From the history, traditions and the convention of the NBC, no Minister of Information has ever interfered in any NBC Code review. After the 2019 presentation of the 6th code (which is the present one), the minister has acted alone with just a handful of his loyalists who have written a new NB Code that has created uproar in the industry, threatening to destroy investments and lead to job losses.

“The NBC Code is a regulatory framework put together jointly by stakeholders to guide their operations in the industry. It is therefore not a unilateral government instrument and is already covered by law hence, not requiring any further Presidential approval. This might be the reason why till date the Hon. Minister cannot show us a copy of the Presidential approval.

“President Buhari is a stickler for due process and he always insists on organisations doing the right thing. The Minister’s version of the revised code does not meet any known criteria of due process and inclusiveness of stakeholders.”

source: https://www.gistmania.com/talk/topic,469967.0.html

Nigeria approves gender and climate change action plan

President Muhammadu Buhari presided over the virtual FEC meeting

The action plan was presented at the virtual meeting of the FEC that was presided by President Muhammadu Buhari on Wednesday, August 12, 2020.

While paving a way for gender responsive climate change initiatives in the country, the National Action Plan is expected to provide guidance to the implementation of different environment and climate change actions to Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) of government at all levels, including the private sector.

The National Action Plan is the outcome of a collaboration involving the Department of Climate Change of the Federal Ministry of Environment, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Women Environment Programme (WEP) and Both Ends.

environewsnigeria

Bank admits Adoke’s $2.2m Was for Loan Repayment

The Unity Bank Plc admitted on Thursday that the $2.2 million received from former Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, Mr Bello Adoke SAN, was for repayment of a N300M naira he obtained from the bank.

Former Acting Managing Director of he bank Mr Rislanudeen Mohammed made the confirmation at the federal high court in Abuja during the ongoing trial of Adoke and oil magnate Alhaji Aliyu Abubakar on alleged corruption changes.

This is coming as trial judge, Justice Inyang Ekwo, warned reporters to stop linking the trial with Malabu Oil issue, adding that they have access to court records and should ask if they need clarification.

Adoke and the businessman, Abubakar are standing trial on a 14 count amended criminal charge bordering on alleged money laundering and corruption preferred against them by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

Mohammed, a second witness of the EFCC in his evidence told the court how Adoke obtained a loan of N300M from the bank and the efforts he made to ensure Adoke repaid the loan.

He said that the loan was finally liquidated when Adoke handed over to him a sum of $2.2 million and that when converted to naira, it exceeded the principal loan amount.

The EFCC witness further disclosed that the former AGF collected the balance and closed the account after the bank deducted all necessary interest regarding the transaction.

Under cross examination by Adoke’s lawyer, Chief Kanu Agabi SAN, the witness admitted accepting $2.2 million dollars on behalf of the bank to liquidate the loan.

He further stated that the $2.2 million was not a proceed of crime because it was in repayment of a loan Adoke obtained from the bank.

“I received the money as an agent of the bank. The money is not available to be confiscated because it is not a proceed of crime.

“I have no reason to believe it is a proceed of crime. The money is not in Adoke’s account because it belongs to the bank”, he said.

The witness further told the court that collecting the money from Adoke’s house did not in anyway constitute an offence because he acted as an agent of the bank.

Testifying further, the witness said upon the full payment of the loan, the title deed used as security by the bank was released by the bank to the second defendant as an indication that the loan has been fully defrayed.

Earlier, the first prosecution witness, a Manager in charge of foreign exchange trade at the Central Bank of Nigeria, Mr Clement Osagie, tendered foreign exchange transaction rates covering August, September and October, 2013 and was admitted as exhibits.

Under cross examination by Olalekan Ojo SAN, lawyer to the second defendant, the witness who stated that the documents tendered were generated from the electronic system of the CBN, said he was not a personnel of the Information Technology (IT) department of the CBN.

Answering a question, Osagie said that the CBN’s licenced Bureau de Change (BdC) operators file report of transactions in CBN forex which are kept by the Trade and Exchange department but he cannot talk on the activities of the BdC.

While admitting that he does not know the defendants in the case, he disclosed that his statement to the EFCC was made after the last court’s proceedings, adding that, “I thought I would just come and tender the documents before the court and go”.

Trial however has been adjourned to September 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 for continuation of cross examination of the second prosecution witness.

Public Service Rules: D.G. Nigerian Copyright Commission, Asein Replies Detractors

Director-General of Nigerian Copyright Commission, Mr John Asein, has replied his detractors and accusers, who alleged that he was keeping another employment and drawing salaries from both ends long after his retirement.

The NCC boss was accused of keeping the position of the Executive Director of Reproduction Rights Society of Nigeria, a collective management organisation regulated by the commission, a practice, which outrightly violates the public service rules and the code of conduct for public officers.

The economic confidential search further reveals that contrary to the said allegations, Mr Asein had on January 15, 2019 formally resigned from REPRONIG through a letter addressed to Chairman of the Board, Prof Olu Obafemi.

Further investigation reveals that in accepting Asein’s resignation, Obafemi appealed to him to continue rendering a free service of assisting REPRONG in the collection and disbursements of incoming funds as pro-bono project coordinator to receive and distribute project funds to the beneficiary partners.

Meanwhile, in an official memo written to the Board and sighted by Economic Confidential, Mr Asein among other things said the board could not meet because the Chairman of Copyright Commission, Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja, said he was waiting for a formal report of an investigation by the Federal Ministry of Justice on a petition of conflict of interest against the DG.

The DG NCC’s memo to Jaja further reads, “ With due respect, I wish to note that while the Chairman has repeatedly drawn the attention of the board members to a petition against me, he is not placing the matter before the board to determine the next line of action. Rather, the Chairman has severally by-passed the supervisory Ministry and the Board to initiate his own petitions based on the documents he claimed to have ‘received’”

He also said that he was aware that the Chairman in the month of May 2020 again wrote to the DSS office and he has since lodged a report of the development with the parent ministry of justice.

According to him, he has no doubt that the same letters must have gone to the presidency as well as security and anti-corruption agencies in line with the proclamation of Chief Tony Okoroji at a press conference that he held at COSON House, Ikeja, Lagos on March 10, 2020.

The memo to the Board Chairman further stated that on or about Sunday, February 2nd, 2020, the Chairman of the Board called him to tell him that based on damning petitions from stakeholders, the minister was considering suspending him from office. He said in view of his reputation and goodwill, he should not risk having Chief Okoroji go public and smear his reputation and suggested he should instead consider putting in a letter of resignation to avoid embarrassment that would follow a ministerial action, only to discover later that the minister’s intended actions were not true.

In the said memo, the DG also said the Chairman had reached out to the various in-house unions in the commission with a view to obtaining information from them or instigating them against management all in a bid to have him removed from office as D-G and to reverse the decision to audit the accounts of COSON.

Checks also reveal that the DG of NCC in the memo accused the Chairman of plagiarising his manuscript sent to him in the course of his duties with him. He said In August 2019, the Chairman published a book: Compendium of Nigerian Copyright Law Reports 2019. He noted that two cases out of the 6 cases in that publication were plagiarized from the manuscript he had emailed to him on June 23, 2019. He said rather than own up to the infraction, even though he was willing to overlook it, the Chairman treated him with disdain and brushed the matter aside and later threatening further action against him.

Meanwhile, Asein told the Board members that intelligence report indicate that high-profile pirates have resolved to mobilize all resources available to support the ongoing fight against the commission in the hope that they can work together to remove him from office.

Mailafia’s Comments: NBC Fines Nigeria Info N5m

The National Broadcasting Commission has fined Nigeria Info 99.3 FM the sum of five million naira for unprofessional conduct.

According to a statement signed and released by the management of NBC, the action was due to the radio’s programme that aired on Monday, August 10.

Recall that in an interview with a Lagos-based FM Radio aired on August 10, Mr Mailafia, a former Deputy Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, had alleged that one of the Northern governors is a Commander of Boko Haram in Nigeria

Read the full statement below:

THE NATIONAL BROADCASTING COMMISSION FINES Nigeria Info 99.3FM FOR UNPROFESSIONAL BROADCAST

The National Broadcasting Commission has noted with grave concern, the unprofessional conduct of Nigeria Info 99.3FM, Lagos, in the handling of the Programme, “Morning Cross Fire”, aired on August 10, 2020, between 8.30am and 9.00am. The station provided its platform for the guest, Dr. Mailafia Obadiah, to promote unverifiable and inciting views that could encourage or incite to crime and lead to public disorder.

The Commission, again, wishes to reiterate that Broadcasters hold Licenses in trust for the people. Therefore, no Broadcast Station should be used, to promote personal or sectional interests at the expense of the people.

Dr. Mailafia Obadia’s comments on the “Southern Kaduna Crisis”, were devoid of facts and by broadcasting same to the public, Nigeria Info 99.3FM, is in violation of the following sections of the Nigeria Broadcasting Code:

3.1.1 No broadcast shall encourage or incite to crime, lead to public disorder or hate, be repugnant to public feelings or contain offensive reference to any person or organization, alive or dead or generally be disrespectful to human dignity;

3.1.2 Broadcasting shall promote human dignity, therefore, hate speech is prohibited;

3.3.1 (a) The broadcaster shall ensure that any information given in a programme, in whatever form, is accurate;

3.3.3.1(b) The Broadcaster shall ensure that all sides to any issue of public

interest are equitably presented for fairness and balance;

3.11.1(a) The broadcaster shall ensure that language or scene likely to encourage or incite to crime, or lead to disorder, is not broadcast;

3.11.1(b) No programme contains anything which amounts to subversion of constituted authority or compromises the unity or corporate existence of Nigeria as a sovereign state;

5.4.1(f) The Broadcaster shall not transmit divisive materials that may threaten or compromise the indivisibility and indissolubility of Nigeria as a sovereign state.

Consequent on these provisions and in line with the amendment of the 6thedition of the Nigeria Broadcasting Code, Nigeria Info 99.3FM Lagos, has been fined the sum of N5,000,000.00 (Five Million Naira), only.

This is expected to serve as a deterrent to all other broadcast stations in Nigeria who are quick to provide platform for subversive rhetoric and the expositions of spurious and unverifiable claims, to desist from such.

The Commission wishes to put it on record that it will not hesitate to suspend the Broadcast Licence of broadcast stations that continue to breach the Code.

Stations are, by this statement, admonished to desist forthwith, from airing unwholesome content, or be ready to face appropriate sanctions.

Signed:

MANAGEMENT

The Legality Of Suspension Of Some Traditional Rulers In Anambra State

By H. E Okolo (Esq)

We all woke up with this rather disturbing news from Anambra state, it’s read as follows:

” The traditional Rulers council of Anambra state resolve in August 11, 2020, that 12  of their members who traveled outside the state recently without consultation/approval from state government be sanctioned. The state government have accepted their  recommendation….

The Above caption refers …..

Let me start by saying that the hasty nature of the above recommendation and subsequent suspension  of some traditional rulers in Anambra state within 2 days have more political undertone attached to it than checks

Having said that, I will also submit that while every community has the power to choose who will be her King or traditional ruler, the Government on its own solidify such action of the community by giving a certificate of recognition to whoever that is chosen by the community to be her King.

On that note, it’s also important to say that the power to make and unmake any King or traditional ruler in Anambra state is vested only in the community and not Government.

If that is the case, the question begging for answer is, has government the absolute power to suspend or relieve any traditional ruler who has not committed or been convicted of any crime in the course of his duties without express recommendation or consultation from his community?

I believe the above question will be answered in the negative!

I will, therefore, submit that once the community makes a king or installs her traditional ruler, whoever that is installed as the king or the traditional ruler of such community remains the king and performs such function as the king or the traditional ruler till death unless he is convicted of any crime or deposed or dethroned by his community for one reason or the other.

I will also submit that such duty, function or power of such king or the traditional ruler over his subjects takes effect immediately the crown is put on his head as the Igwe of such community and not when he is given a certificate of recognition by the state government.

I will also submit that the governmental function or duty in any process of Ichi Igwe (making of king) of any community is merely supervisory and recognition of the collective actions of the community by issuing certificate of recognition and never to take active participation in such actions. The case of Deji of Akure land is classical example

So in actual sense, the power to make and unmake any King or traditional Ruler rests solely on the community involved with little supervisory efforts from the government. If such is the case, the question is, can government wake up in the morning suspend any traditional ruler?

Having said that, let’s then take a look at the legality of recent suspension of some traditional Rullers in Anambra state by state government for traveling outside the state without consultation or permission from state government

Let me attempt the above subject by saying that ours is Democracy centered on rule of law

Rule of law entails that the government cannot do anything except those things that are permitted by law whereas the individuals can do anything except those things that are prohibited by law

Article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights reads:

(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each State….

 (1) Everyone lawfully within the territory of a State shall, within that territory, have the right to liberty of movement and freedom to choose his residence

The constitution of Federal Republic of Nigeria under section 41 (1) thereof provides that:

“Every Citizen of Nigeria is entitled to move freely throughout Nigeria and to reside in any part thereof, and no citizen shall be expelled from Nigeria or refused entry thereto or exit therefrom.” Emphasis mine.

For the government of Anambra state to suspend some traditional rulers for exercising their freedom of movement as guaranteed by the constitution of Federal Republic of Nigeria via sec 41 is not only laughable but outrageous and should be frowned at by right-thinking members of the society

As it stand today in Nigeria, I have not come across any law that says that any traditional ruler must seek and obtain permission or authorization of any government agency before excising his right to freedom of movement. And If there is such a law in existence in Anambra state, then I will submit that such law is unconstitutional for the fact that it’s inconsistent with the provision of sec 41  and 42 of 1999 constitution, and sec 1(3) of the constitution renders such law null and void to the extent of it’s inconsistency with any provision of the constitution

Having said the above, I will dare  to submit that traditional rulers in Anambra state are not government or political appointees that can be given, suspended or  be terminated at any time at  the whims of the executive Governor of the state through any government agency

I will conclude by borrowing the words of Pat’s Acheolonu JSC that:

No sane person in our society having regards to the provision for (freedom of movement) made patently clear in the 1999 constitution would support the nihilistic and obtuse stand  of traditional rulers council of Anambra state in recommending for suspension and subsequent actions of Anambra state government in suspending and relief of duties of twelve (12) traditional rulers in the state for one year for sole REASON THAT THEY TRAVELED OUTSIDE THE STATE WITHOUT CONSULTATION  OR APPROVAL OF STATE GOVERNMENT

Such cruel circular publication by Anambra state government on 11th of August 2020 is negativistic and abhorrent in our modern society guided by Democracy and rule of law

The traditional rulers involved are advised to promptly challenge such governmental actions in the High court of the state for both declarative and injunctive relief.

H. E Okolo (Esq) Abuja FCT.

Kebbi Police Charged Father Of Chained 12-Yr-Old Boy To Court For Alleged Cruelness

Aliyu Umaru, who chained his 12-year-old son, Jibrin, for two years in Kebbi has been charged for cruelty.

Kebbi Police Public Relation Officer (PPRO), DSP Nafiu Abubakar, disclosed this in a statement.

According to him: ”The Kebbi State Police Command wishes to inform members of the general public that on the 09/08/2020 at about 1440hrs, information revealed that, one Jibrin Aliyu,male, aged,12 years of Badariya area, Birnin Kebbi was tied with a rope alongside with animals and chickens for a period of two years after demise of his biological mother without treatment and feeding in their residence.

“On the receipt of the report, detectives attached to the Divisional Police Headquarters, Birnin Kebbi, swiftly rushed to the scene, rescued the victim and took him to Sir Yahyah Memorial Hospital, Birnin Kebbi for medical attention.

”In the course of investigation, it was discovered that the victim, Jibrin Aliyu is a patient of Down Syndrome and his father, Aliyu Umaru has admitted to have tied him with a rope because he had taken him to various native doctors for medication up to the extent of selling some of his properties but all in vein.

“Instead of his father to continue with his medication, he decided to subject him to such inhumane and degrading treatment in order to prevent him from roaming about in the town, stoning peoples’ vehicles as well as injuring himself which could lead to his death.

”In the light of the above Aliyu Umaru was found culpable of being cruel to his son and has been charged to Court accordingly.”

Thenigerialawyer

TIPS