Home Blog Page 1236

Iyan Zazzau Drags El-Rufai To Court Over Appointment Of Ahmed Bamalli As Emir

A prince of Zazzau Emirate in Kaduna State, Bashari Aminu, has gone to court to challenge the appointment of Ahmed Bamalli as the new emir of Zazzau.

Mr Bamalli, erstwhile Nigerian ambassador to Thailand, was announced as the new emir by the Kaduna State Government on Wednesday.

The suit was filed at the Kaduna State High Court.

Mr Bamalli’s appointment followed the death of Shehu Idris who died on September 20, after reigning as emir for 45 years.

Mr Aminu, who holds the title of Iyan Zazzau, was ranked first in an initial shortlist submitted to Governor Nasir El-Rufai by the five kingmakers of the emirate.

The state government, however, discarded the kingmakers’ report, citing allegations of inducement by one of the contenders.

The government later announced the appointment of Mr Bamalli, following a fresh selection process among 13 princes, ordered by the state government.

Court documents seen show that Mr Aminu sued Mr El-Rufai and nine others in the suit seeking to quash Mr Bamalli’s appointment.

The court filings signed by Yunus Usman, a senior advocate of Nigeria, seeks 10 reliefs from the court.

Aside Messrs El-Rufai and Bamalli, Mr Aminu also joined the Kaduna State Attorney General, Kaduna Council of Chiefs, Zazzau Emirate Council and the five kingmakers as parties to the suit.

The prayers

Mr Aminu prayed the court to validate the selection process of the Zazzau kingmakers which placed him ahead of two other princes and excluded Mr Bamalli from the shortlist.

He argues that the appointment of Mr Bamalli contravened Chiefs (Appointment and Depositions) Law Cap 21 of 1991.

Mr Aminu wants the court to declare the appointment as “irregular, illegal, unconstitutional, unjust inequitable and contrary to good conscience, null and void and of no effect whatsoever”.

He also asked the court to declare that he was “duly and properly selected/elected and appointed as the Emir of Zazzau (Zaria) by the traditional kingmakers of Zazzau in accordance with Zazzau Native Law, Custom and Tradition.”

He also wants the court to bar Mr Bamalli from declaring himself as the emir of Zazzau and to stop the state government from proceeding with Mr Bamalli’s coronation as the Zazzau emir.

Mr El-Rufai’s spokesperson, Muyiwa Adekeye, could not be reached for comment on this story and whether or not the governor had been served the court papers.

Pay-As-You-Go Not Feasible — MultiChoice CEO

The Pay-As-You-Go(PAYG) billing model advocated by Nigerians is not technically and commercially feasible, the Chief Executive Officer of MultiChoice Nigeria, owners of DSTV John Ugbe has stated.

Ugbe, who spoke when he appeared before the House of Representatives Ad Hoc Committee investigating the non-implementation of PAYG subscription model by satellite television operators, said the company does not have the technology to offer pay as you go at the moment.

He explained that Pay-Per-View (PPV) is often confused with PAYG, adding that the PAYG model used in the telecommunications sector is not the right fit for pay television.

According to him, PAYG in telecommunications, is a metered service that ensures consumers are billed only for the service they consume and not for a fixed period.

He argued that Pay- As-You-Go is possible in telecommunication sector because it relies on a two-way communication system, which enables operators to determine when a consumer is connected, the service consumed and duration of connection.

He maintained satellite broadcasters, unlike telecommunications firms, cannot offer pay television services because satellite broadcasting is a one-way system and does not enable broadcasters to determine when a subscriber is connected and/or watching or what channel is being viewed.

He said: “It is only in instances where there is a two-way communication between the device at the subscriber’s home and the headend of the pay-tv service provider, which will enable the provider to determine when a subscriber is connected or not, that a billing system could be designed to take into cognizance the subscriber’s behaviour”.

He said the Pay- As-You- Go can only be feasible if there is a total and global remodelling of the satellite broadcasting technical and billing architecture, adding the result will be that consumers will have to much higher tariffs to access the service.

“The economies of scale model employed by broadcasters mean that subscribers pay less.

“We are yet to see a pay TV business anywhere in the world that does PAYG in the sense intended here. We do not believe the model is technically or commercially feasible,” Ugbe declared.

He maintained that Pay-Per-View, is however different from PAYG and more expensive, as it entails a broadcaster transmitting a single event at the same time to its subscribers who have paid to watch the event.

“A subscriber who wants to watch an event on PPV is required to pay an additional fee besides his subscription.

“A typical example would be the Mayweather and Pacquiao, and Wilder and Fury II boxing bouts which were retailed on PPV in the United States for $100 and $79.99 respectively.

“The Mayweather/Pacquiao bout, which was shown on DStv premium bouquet, would cost N38,000, which would far exceed the cost of any of the DStv bouquets.

“The bouquet or bundling model is an effective and efficient means of providing a large but still manageable variety of choice to satisfy consumer demand for entertainment, at the lowest possible cost to consumers,” he said.

Ugbe also addressed the widespread belief that MultiChoice adjusted tariffs on 1 June, noting that what it did was to implement the new rate of the Value Added Tax (VAT), as required by law, adding the company takes into account many factors like inflation, increasing costs of input costs and technical upgrades, impact on subscribers as well as exchange rate fluctuations to arrive at tariffs.

Nigeria’s peculiar love affair with Donald Trump

By Femi Aribisala, Chairman, Financial Nigeria International Limited

A poll conducted by Pew Research Center revealed that Donald Trump is disliked by a majority of people virtually everywhere in the world except in a small number of countries. Among these are: Nigeria and Israel. Even in the United States where Trump is president, 52% of the people not only agreed with his impeachment by the United States House of Representatives, they also wanted him summarily removed from office.

The paradox of the love for Trump in Israel lies in the fact that he is hated by American Jews. They hate his politics and are not fooled by his overtures to Israel, which they believe militates against any peace process with the Palestinians. They are also concerned that he has turned the traditional bi-partisan American support for Israel into a partisan Republican support.

American Jews are traditionally liberal Democrats. They know the rise of Donald Trump is directly responsible for the rise of anti-Semitism in the U.S. They know that, in spite of his pretenses, Trump himself is as anti-Semitic as his core supporters. That is why he defended the rioters at Charleston, South Carolina who were chanting: “Jews will not replace us.”

Racist slurs

Yet even more paradoxical is the Nigerian love for Donald Trump. If African-Americans refuse to support Trump, who is virulently racist, why should Nigerians love him?

Trump hates Nigeria. He called Nigeria “a shithole country.” He castigated the Nigerian president as “lifeless.” His “America First” policy does Nigerians no favours. Under Trump, Nigerian immigrants are no longer accorded permanent residence visas to the United States. Trump has publicly stated his preference for lily-white Scandinavian immigrants instead of blacks from Africa.

In the 1970s, the U.S. Department of Justice sued Trump for racial discrimination in his real estate business, and won the case. The problem was that Trump violated U.S. government policy by refusing to rent housing to black tenants.

In 1989, Trump falsely accused four black teenagers and one Latino (the Central Park Five) of attacking and raping a jogger in New York. He ran ads in newspapers asking the teenagers to be given the death penalty. The teens were convicted and sent to prison, but after 7 to 16 years, their convictions were reversed when it was discovered they were innocent.

Mary Trump, the U.S. President’s niece, confirms that disparaging blacks and using racist and anti-Semitic slurs were commonplace among the older Trump generation.

In 2016, during his earlier campaign for president, Trump refused to disavow the Ku Klux Kan, an infamous racist hate group. As president, he pandered to white supremacists at the racial uprising in Charleston. More recently, at his debate with Joe Biden ahead of the 2020 American presidential election, Trump again refused to denounce white supremacists. Instead, he told the cantankerous and narcissistic “Proud Boys” to: “Stand back and stand by.”

Reactionary Trumpism

Trump’s political rise was in reaction against a black man, Barack Obama, becoming president of the United States. Obama’s election was a watershed moment in American politics. With it, conservative American whites sensed imminent danger to white supremacy.

Obama won by stringing together a rainbow coalition of blacks, whites, Hispanics and Indian voters. Population trends indicate it is a matter of time before the U.S. becomes a majority non-white society. But not without a fight from racist whites.

So, a champion emerged in the person of Donald Trump, whose mission was to slow down the process, if not possibly derail it altogether. Trump embarked on this process by championing the “birther” movement against Obama; a racist coalition that insisted falsely that Obama was not born in the U.S. and, therefore, was an illegal president.

Even after it was shown conclusively through his birth certificate that Obama is a native-born American, Trump and his racist supporters continued to popularize the fake news that Obama is a foreigner.

After two terms of Obama, Trump ran for president on a platform designed to reverse everything the former president did. Trump says his agenda is to “Make America Great Again.” But this is a dog-whistle for “Making America White Again.” Trump is determined that non-white immigration to the U.S. must be restricted to the barest minimum.

Why then would 58% of Nigerians (according to the survey by Pew) love Trump despite his racist credentials? My answer is simple: Nigerian Trumpkins are ignorant. They don’t know Trump. Therefore, they ascribe to him what is anathema to him.

Biafran champion

Latter-day Biafran secessionists in Nigeria see Trump as their champion. The nationalism intoned in Trump’s “America first” mantra is for these Nigerians a rallying cry for “Biafra first.” They also assume that because Trump supported Brexit in the United Kingdom, he would support “Igbo-exit” from Nigeria. That is simply wishful thinking.

Donald Trump is well-known for only thinking about Donald Trump. He does not even think about Americans, much less Igbo Nigerians. His sister has been caught on tape saying Trump does not even care about his supporters but is only fooling and using them.

Like Nero, Trump has fiddled while over 200,000 of his countrymen have died from COVID-19, all the while saying the disease was a hoax that would miraculously disappear. It is karma that Trump himself is now afflicted by the COVID-19 hoax.

If Trump does not care about Americans beyond his political and electoral fortunes, it is preposterous for Ndigbo in Nigeria to presume he cares about them and about their dreams of Biafra.

While a hypothetical Biafra has no strategic relevance to American security, Ukraine does. However, Trump held back strategic military aid to Ukraine in order to blackmail its president to come up with false corruption claims against his political rival, Joe Biden.

Trump’s disregard for Nigeria in particular and for Africa in general is evident in the fact that after almost four years in office, he has not found it necessary to fill the posts that address U.S. policy towards Africa. To date, the United States has no Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, and the post of the Senior Director for Africa on the U.S. National Security Council remains unfilled.

Trump’s islamophobia also seems to resonate with Biafran irredentists, who blame Northern Nigeria’s Muslim leadership for decades of Igbo oppression and exclusion from the Nigerian mainstream. What they fail to recognize, however, is that sleazy Trump is also a key ally of Muslim Saudi Arabia, the chief financier and exporter of Islamist extremism in the world.

Pseudo Christian

Nigerians (especially from the South East) consider Trump to be a Christian champion. They like him because he is a staunch defender of Israel. They like him because he is rhetorically anti-Islam. They like him because they hate Obama and his policy of international promotion of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights.

Nigerian supporters of the U.S. president like him because his right-wing Republican base is against abortion and he is populating the U.S. judiciary with anti-abortion judges. As a result of all this, 75% of Christian evangelicals in the U.S. support Trump.

What Nigerian Christians fail to realise, however, is that Trump is a classic wolf in sheep’s clothing. Trump does not talk like a Christian and he does not live as one. He hardly ever goes to church and is a foreigner to the scriptures. He once made a mockery of himself by saying “Two Corinthians” instead of “Second Corinthians.”

There is nothing Christlike about Trump. He is an adulterer and a serial womanizer. He publicly humiliated his first wife, Ivana, by having a lurid public affair with Marla Maples that was serialized in the tabloids.

There is a case before the New York Court of Appeals about Trump paying hush-money to prostitutes. This case is waiting for him to leave the presidency. It has already sent Trump’s lawyer to jail.

Trump is a transactional politician. He only likes those who like him, and he supports those who are beneficial to him. He is on record despising Christians, claiming pastors are stupid; but he aligns himself with the American evangelicals simply because of the votes they can deliver at the polls.

He has no ideological convictions. He was a Democrat before he became a Republican. Trump was in support of LGBT rights, welcomed them in his hotels and clubs before he denounced them just to ingratiate himself with the religious right. He only became against abortion when it was time for him to run for the presidency.

Con man

Trump is a corrupt and fraudulent man. He created a fake Trump University, which he used to defraud the innocent. He was declared guilty in court and had to refund $25 million dollars to the students.

He created a charity, Donald J. Trump Foundation, which he used to collect money from the public. He was accused of misusing the charity’s funds, including spending $30,000 to buy a portrait of himself. The foundation agreed to shut down and a judge ordered Trump to refund $2 million.

The Washington Post found that, since becoming president, Trump has been caught publicly making false or misleading claims over 20,000 times, as of August 2020. Trump’s Twitter feed alone, which is full of insults, slanders, lies, and mischaracterisations, is eloquent testimony of his moral depravity. These are hardly the credentials of a committed Christian.

Congenital ignoramus

Many of the people who have worked with Trump as president have walked away describing him as capricious, egocentric, and dangerously ignorant. They say he is a president who does not like to read and spends most of his time watching television or spewing hate and insults on Twitter.

According to his niece, Mary, Trump paid a proxy to take the exams that got him admitted to the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton Business School. It is not surprising, therefore, that the president of the most advanced country in the world is incredibly ignorant on so many levels.

His interminable tweets show he has problems spelling English words. He does not believe in science, insists climate change is a hoax and claims windmills cause cancer.

The end

Trump lost the 2016 election by three million votes but won on the technicality of the electoral college, a system that exaggerates the political significance of the less populous states vis-à-vis the more populous ones.

But the presidency of Trump has been so disastrous, it can only have one effect: to tell Americans that under no circumstances should they re-elect Trump as president. The polls suggest that Donald Trump will lose the coming election by a landslide.

After his political demise, every facet of Trumpism will be dismantled ensuring that another Trump does not emerge again in American politics. The electoral college system is likely to be abolished, and Trump’s conservative Supreme Court is likely to be diluted by the addition of four new liberal justices.

It should be noted that Trump’s presidency has not stopped the ascendancy of blacks in the American political space. Issues that affect blacks are now on the front-burner of American politics. In all the bye-elections since the ascendance of Trump to the presidency, the black vote has been decisive in provoking the resurgence of the Democratic Party.

My prediction is that the Trump years are destined to be viewed primarily as an aberrant apologetic era in American history.

Femi Aribisala was the Special Adviser to Professor Bolaji Akinyemi as Foreign Minister of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. He holds a PhD in International Relations from Oxford University. He also writes a popular column on the Christian faith in one of Nigeria’s newspapers.

#EndSARS: Disbanding SARS Is Not The Answer To Police Brutality, But The Character Of People Being Recruited Into The Force —J.S Okutepa, SAN

Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Mr. J.S Okutepa has stated that the disbandment of the Special Anti Robbery Squad (SARS) by the Inspector General of Police is not the complete solution to the brutality being perpetrated by the Police.

The learned silk stated this in a statement made available to TheNigeriaLawyer, noting that there is more to be done aside disbanding them.

Meanwhile, he noted that there is a need to reevaluate the character of people being recruited to become Police personnel.

“Honestly scraping SARs or FSARs is not an answer to police brutality. Disbanding them is not the answer.

“The problem is with the character of persons recruited into the force and the inability of the state to adequately fund the police.” He said.

In addition, he said the corruption in the system aids brutality to be meted out for their personal gains, adding that there is an inability to do investigation devoid of being brutal.

“The problem is in the corruption in the system that tolerates the police to be brutal for profits.

“The problem is our inability to do modern scientific investigations devoid of brutality.”

He added that, “The problem is in our inability to apply sanctions when wrongs are done.”

In addition, the learned silk noted that there is a need to properly screen persons being recruited to the Police.

“The problem is in us. Those personnel needs to be profiled and screened. How do you recruit thieves to police thieves”, he said.

FG Extends Suspension of New Electricity Tariff by One Week

The federal government and the organised labour last night resolved to extend the suspension of the new electricity tariffs by one week to enable the technical committee on its review to work out modalities for the implementation of the agreement reached on the electricity tariffs structure as well as address some grey areas of the report.

This was part of the decisions reached at the meeting between the federal government and organised labour at the Presidential Villa in Abuja.

Chairman of the Nigeria Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC), Prof. James Momoh who confirmed the extension of the suspension of new tariffs regime at the Tripartite Committee meeting by the organised labour, the government and relevant stakeholders, said NERC was committed to ensure that the power sector works no matter what it would take.

As part of palliatives in the power sector, the federal government said it had approved six million meters to be distributed across the country.

The Minister of State for Power, Prince Goddy Jedy-Agba said one million meters were already available and that distributions would start within the week.

He disclosed that the distribution would be completed before December.

The resolution read by the Chairman of the Technical Committee and Minister of State for Labour and Employment, Mr. Festus Keyamo, said, “the committee adopted a two-phase approach to proffer solutions that would help resolve issues affecting the sector in the medium term, whilst providing relief to customers immediately.

“The immediate relief would be provided to citizens for a 2 to 3-month period (not later than December 31, 2020), being the timeline for the conclusion of an extended scope of work for the Technical Committee”.

Some of the issues to address include timeline for the distribution of the six million electricity meters being pledged by government as part of the palliative deal.

In the report of the committee, federal government accepted to procure six million meters to be distributed by the Discos to electricity consumers without metres.

It said: “six million meters will only be through local meter manufacturers and assemblers and will be targeted at creating local jobs and a new meter manufacturing sub-sector in the country”.

The report also provided for salary protection for electricity workers.

It said that government will ensure that the salaries for electricity workers are protected in the revised payment waterfall structure.

The report further states that: “Mandatory monthly publication by Nigeria Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) of allowed billings in Naira for unmetered customers to make the capping regulation more effective.

“NERC will publish maximum charges in Naira for consumers without meters (in support of the capping regulation); freezing of customer band migration during the interim period: In order to protect customers from changes in tariff during the 2-3 month period of review by the Joint Technical Committee”.

The report said that Discos will be directed to temporarily suspend customer band migration.

“This means that while Discos are expected to fulfill their Performance Improvement Plans (PIP) thereby improving the quality of service to customers, no added charges will be passed on to customers during this period. This measure is aimed at building confidence in the Service-based Tariff structure”.

Other aspects of the technical committee’s report include, the inclusion of labour representation in NERC, extensive review of key sector reforms, ground Audit of implementation across Discos, review of monitoring and evaluation mechanisms set up by NERC and the Discos.

Others are gas pricing: review mechanisms for pricing the domestic supply obligation (DSO) and the foreign exchange component(s), decentralisation of the grid.

The government is to explore ways to accelerate investment and bring more players into the sector, drive investment and reduce costs for end-users. Options should be in addition to the Franchising and Mini-Grid regulations.

On the issue of import duty waivers for the electricity sector, the committee was mandated to investigate and recommend ways for the electricity sector to receive incentives that will reduce costs across the value chain that will impact on tariff.

Organised labour led by the President of the Nigeria Labour Congress, (NLC), Mr. Ayuba Wabba and Trade Union Congress (TUC), Mr. Quadri Olaleye demanded an inclusion of timelines for the implementation of the report.

They insisted that there should be a time line for the distribution of the six million metres promised by the federal government..

Olaleye sought to know what federal government will do with the N1.7 billion it said will be saved daily from the removal of subsidy on electricity tariff.

But the Minister of Labour and Employment, Senator Chris Ngige interjected and said that federal government is currently experiencing economic difficulties and would rather plough the savings to fund the deficit budget.

Wike: Zamfara Gold: I Never Said FG Should Hands Off Rivers Oil

Rivers State Governor, Nyesom Wike has denied making any statement that Rivers state can also manage its oil like the case of the gold in Zamfara.

A statement by Paulinus Nsirim, the Commissioner for Information reads ” The attention of the Rivers State Government has been drawn to a completely false and misleading story circulating in the Social Media, that Governor Nyesom Wike of Rivers State made some remarks in connection with a report that the Central Bank of Nigeria will purchase N 5billion worth of Gold from the Zamfara State Government”.

“The purveyors of this barefaced fallacy suggested in their warped story, that Governor Wike was unhappy with the decision of the CBN to buy Gold from Zamfara State” .

“They claimed that Governor Wike who lamented that the same privileged attention has not been given to the oil from Rivers State, demanded that Gold should be made a national cake, adding that he too would proceed to own a gold well in Zamfara State”.

Let us state here categorically that Governor Wike never made such a statement. Infact, we note with a sense of relief, that no major, mainstream News media or Press Organization, either print, electronic or online, attached to Government House, Port Harcourt, carried this concocted story.

So it is a wonder where the mushroom, less than credible social media outlets got the comments, which they claimed Governor Wike made “while addressing the Press.”

It has indeed become the ugly penchant in recent times, of some cynical and dubious detractors, to drop or insert Governor Wike’s name in their calculated crusade to ignite unprovoked conflict with the hidden ploy to disrupt the recently emerging warm cordiality which has defined the relationship between him and some leaders across geopolitical divides in the country.

These naysayers have also commenced a devious gambit to insidiously tarnish the overwhelming goodwill which the burgeoning image and reputation of Governor Wike has been enjoying across the country and this latest story is simply the latest installment of their failed efforts.

Those familiar with Governor Wike will know that he does not need to resort to such churlish and petty grandstanding portrayed in the silly story, to speak up on any matter whatsoever.

The write up is thus just another figment of the convoluted imagination of its authors. They goofed big time on this one.

Nigerians are therefore advised to completely disregard the story, especially now that the Federal Government, the CBN and the Zamfara State Government have all come out to speak clearly on the matter and set the records straight.

FG Presses Ahead With Water Resources Bil

Minister of Water Resources, Suleiman Adamu, has said opposition to the Water Resources Bill by people from the South-South and Middle Belt would not stop the Federal Government from going ahead with the new law.

The minister, who said opposition to the new water Bill was unwarranted explained that those from the two zones would be the greatest beneficiaries if passed by the National Assembly.

Adamu, who addressed newsmen, in Abuja, yesterday, brushed aside insinuations that the Bill was being championed by President Muhammadu Buhari to enable him snatch people’s lands, institutionalise Ruga and northernise the country.

He argued that over 95 per cent content of the Bill was already in existence before the advent of the Buhari’s administration as it was first drafted in 2006 and completed in 2008.

He pointed out that before it was sent to the National Assembly, copies were distributed to the 36 governors for inputs and some gave recommendations while the rest were satisfied with it.

On the revenue that would be generated, he said the funds would be shared between the federal and state governments.

“Being a constitutional ministry, the bill is something that has been in the works for several years especially eight years. We thought it was a routine matter to adjust it.

“This bill past through the House of Representatives without any issue. So, when it came out with all the cacophony, it really took us by surprise.

“People have forgotten that in 2018 when this controversy started, I went to the TV and stations, I put out statements on this matter. And in 2020 this same issue came up again.

“The process of drafting this Bill started in 2006. And it was completed in 2008. And because Nigeria has subscribed to the Integrated Water Resources Management Commission Act which was created in 2017, it delegated the power of the minister drawn from the Water Resources Act of 2004 otherwise known as Decreed 101 of 1990.

“There is nothing new in the Bill. It is just an agglomeration of the 4 existing laws. Nothing more. The bill is to assist us move the water sector forward.

“If people are saying that we should throw the Bill, there is nothing to throw away because the bill is existing whether you pass it now or you don’t pass it, the rules are there.

“We will continue to implement them. But we are losing two important things. We will not have the opportunity to improve food security,” the minister said.

He claimed that those thwarting the passage of the Bill “have not read it. They are politicising it based on what they have heard.”

AGF, Malami Charges Legal Aid Council On Equal Access To Justice For All

Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, SAN has charged the Legal Aid Council to ensure equal access to justice for all irrespective of means and that Constitutional rights of citizens are respected, protected and defended.

A statement from Dr. Umar Jibrilu Gwandu, Special Assistant on Media and Public Relations, Office of the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice said Malami made the call in Kano on Monday while declaring open a two-day Legal Aid Governing Board Retreat with the theme “The Role of the Governing Board in the Corporate Governance: Providing Strategic Direction towards Achieving the Mandate of the Legal Aid Council”.

Malami who charged Board Members of the Council to keep themselves abreast with the extant laws said the policies of the Council must retain the force of facilitating its core objectives which includes the provision of pro-bono legal services to indigent, economically deficient and less privileged Nigerians.

He said the services of Legal Aid Council are geared towards reducing, to the barest minimum, incidents of Human Rights abuses perpetrated against nation’s citizens.

“The Board’s policies must assist the Council to remain the leading and pro-active provider of free, qualitative and timely legal aid services in Nigeria, ensuring social justice and the emancipation of the oppressed, reprieve to the weak and vulnerable, thereby giving voice to the voiceless,” he said.

According to Malami such steps would enable the Board to bear allegiance to the motto of the Council: “Giving Voice to the Voiceless” while maintaining the Council’s Mission mantra: “To ensure free, effective and efficient legal aid services to indigents in Nigeria.”

The Minister assured the Council of the commitment of the Federal Government of Nigeria and the Federal Ministry of Justice in supporting activities of the Council aimed at providing strategic direction in achieving its mandates, adding that his Office in conjunction with the Management of the Legal Aid Council have duly concluded all the requisite legal arrangements for the launch of the “ACCESS TO JUSTICE FUND”, a Fund duly provided for under the Legal Aid Act, 2011, which is a unique national fund aimed to raise funds for the assistance of legal aid works in Nigeria.

The Minister who expressed appreciation over the cordial working relationship between the Council and the Federal Ministry of Justice being the Supervisory Ministry of the Council, cited Paragraphs 1 (iii) and (iv) of the Federal Government Circular Ref No. SGF/OP/1/S.3/T.1/142 dated 2nd August, 1999 which provides that “the Ministry is not to take over the running of the Parastatals/Government-owned Companies under them by getting involved in their day to day management, and that Ministers are not expected to serve as Chairmen of Boards of Parastatals and Government-owned Companies under their Ministries”.

He also commended the Council for releasing thirty-one (31) of its Law Officers for the terrorism trail of Boko-Haram members which, he said provided the requisite legal defence in the trial. (thenigerialawyer)

Okonjo-Iweala visits Buhari in Aso Rock

Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Nigeria’s candidate for the World Trade Organisation (WTO), is currently holding a meeting with President Muhammadu Buhari in Aso Rock.

The former minister of finance was announced as one of the two final candidates in the WTO election alongside Yoo Myung-hee, the South Korean candidate.

She was accompanied to the villa by Niyi Adebayo, the minister of industry, trade and investment, Zubair Dada, the minister of state for foreign affairs, and Maryam Katagum, the minister of state for industry, trade and investment.

Okonjo-Iweala, 66, served as her country’s first female finance and foreign minister, and has a 25-year career behind her as a development economist at the World Bank, eventually becoming its number two.

She is also on Twitter’s board of directors and is a special envoy for the World Health Organization’s Covid-19 fight.

#EndSARS: Access To Justice Says SARS Disbandment Not Enough, Calls For Urgent Reform Of Police & Security Agencies To Confront Impunity

Human Rights Group, Access to Justice has stated that the disbandment of the Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS) is not enough to confront the impunity and entrenched lawlessness, calling for more urgent reforms to be carried out.

This was disclosed in a statement issued by the Group on Sunday, signed by the Convener, Joseph Otte & the Project Director, Deji Ajare, which was made available to TheNigeriaLawyer.

“Access to Justice welcomes the dissolution of the Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS) by the Inspector-General of Police following the recent public outcry over police brutality, particularly those of the SARS. However, dissolving SARS is not enough and will not address the large-scale and widespread culture of impunity that has characterized the delivery of policing and security services in Nigeria.

“That culture of impunity is rife and thriving in the Police Force as most people know. If the Police Force as a whole is not reformed, it is highly unlikely that any new initiatives or tactical Units created out of the Force will operate differently from the way SARS did. The institutional culture of the Police, as well as other law enforcement/security agencies promotes impunity, lawlessness, lack of accountability and disregard for the rule of law.”

Meanwhile, it was stated that successive administrations have not paid attention to this endemic culture, adding that, “ Past and present governments in Nigeria are enablers of this culture. Neither the Buhari government nor past governments have done anything significantly more than traffic in largely “empty” rhetoric regarding reform of law enforcement and security institutions. The actual work of undertaking reforms that would make Nigeria’s law enforcement and security agencies accountable, professional and respectful of the rule of law has been left undone, and traded-off for the rhetoric.”

However, it was stated that the present administration failed to do the needful, and as such, aiding the impunity culture.

“President Buhari’s government has, possibly more than any other, created the atmosphere for widespread impunity to thrive and flourish. Under his administration, – as many independent reports have asserted – thousands of Nigerians have been summarily or extrajudicially killed by security and law enforcement officials in circumstances that are themselves an expression of the confidence which officials of these institutions have that no consequences will follow their brutal actions, and indeed, nothing has followed.”

In the light of the forgoing, the Group made the following five recommendations:

“Do more than lip-service, and immediately commence the reform of all law enforcement and security institutions in order to confront and kick out deeply entrenched cultures of lawlessness and impunity within them. For this purpose, government must itself lead by example. By showing intolerance for acts of lawlessness and impunity, and complying with court orders, government will set the marker for law enforcement and security agencies’ conducts in this respect.

“Government must conduct a thorough review or audit of [the dissolved] SARS operations, and, for this purpose, establish a fact-finding Inquiry into how the unit transformed into a notorious scheme of oppression and injustice; every SARS official who was involved in the brutal and widespread assault of citizens and the violations of human rights must be brought to justice, including being prosecuted, in order to safeguard against similar atrocities in the future. If these operatives are not identified and sanctioned now, they may very well find their ways into new successor initiatives to SARS, and thus forcing Nigerians to relive the past in the form of old wine in new wineskins. Also, by bringing perpetrators of human rights abuses to justice, Government begins the arduous task of tackling the culture of lawlessness and impunity in its key security institutions.

“Government must re-organize current accountability systems in order for police services to function accountably. The Police Service Commission which is constitutionally responsible for the discipline of members of the Police Force is practically toothless and unable to implement its crucial mandate.

“Government must immediately abrogate laws – such as the Sheriff and Civil Process Act [SCPA] 2004 – which make it nearly impossible for courts to hold the police –and other law enforcement and security agencies – to account. Unless those laws are jettisoned, courts may also continue to face daunting challenges in upholding the rule of law and punishing the infraction of civil rights. Furthermore, law enforcement and security institutions (and their operatives) will continue to act with impunity knowing that Nigeria’s laws, in practice, shield and protect them from being made accountable for their actions.

“Government must also improve the service and post-service welfare of officers of the Police Force. In addition, there is a need for Government to ensure that Police officers are given the tools they need for their jobs as some of the extortionist tendencies amongst members of the force is aimed at raising funds to get their jobs done. Finally, training and retraining of the rank and file of the force must be given more priority and selection for these trainings must be done on need basis and not on the basis of other sentiments.”

TIPS