Home Blog Page 1143

Zabarmari massacre: All you’ve given the north is death, destruction – Aisha Yesufu attacks Buhari

Aisha Yesufu, co-convener of BringBackOurGirls, BBOG, advocacy group, has lamented the recent killing of over 43 farmers by members of the dreaded Islamic sect, Boko Haram.

The activist totally blamed President Muhammadu Buhari for the spate of insecurity in the North.

According to Yesufu, Northerners gave Buhari everything including votes and love but the President in exchange gave the region nothing but death and destruction.

Newspot reported earlier that about 43 farmers were beheaded by Boko Haram terrorists in Zabarmari,Borno state.

The North have been ravaged with kidnappings and killings carried out by bandits and Boko Haram terrorists.

In a tweet on Sunday, Yesufu said, “Northern people gave Buhari everything and Buhari gave them nothing!

“Northern people gave Buhari votes and Buhari gave them destruction, Northern people gave Buhari love and Buhari gave them tears.

“Northern people gave Buhari support and Buhari gave them death #ZabarmariMassacre.”

At least 110 civilians killed in ‘gruesome’ Nigeria massacre

Farmers harvesting crops in Borno state attacked by armed men on motorcycles, in the ‘most violent direct’ assault against civilians this year, UN says.

A “gruesome” massacre against farmers in northeastern Nigeria killed at least 110 people, the United Nations has said, raising tolls initially indicating 43 and then at least 70 dead.

The killings took place in the early afternoon of Saturday in the village of Koshobe and other rural communities in the Jere local government area near Maiduguri, the capital of the conflict-hit Borno state.

“Armed men on motorcycles led a brutal attack on civilian men and women who were harvesting their fields,” Edward Kallon, the UN’s humanitarian coordinator in Nigeria, said in a statement on Sunday.

“At least 110 civilians were ruthlessly killed and many others were wounded in this attack,” he added, noting that several women are believed to have been kidnapped.

“The incident is the most violent direct attack against innocent civilians this year. I call for the perpetrators of this heinous and senseless act to be brought to justice,” Kallon said.

There has been no claim of responsibility for the attack, but the armed group Boko Haram and its splinter faction, the Islamic State in West Africa Province (ISWAP), have carried out a series of deadly assaults in the area in recent years.

Both groups are active in the region, where fighters have killed more than 30,000 people in the past decade during an armed campaign that has displaced some two million and has spread to neighbouring countries including Niger, Chad and Cameroon.

Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari, who took office in 2015 promising to fix the security crisis, denounced the latest massacre.

“I condemn the killing of our hard-working farmers by terrorists in Borno state. The entire country is hurt by these senseless killings,” the president said via his spokesman.

But security analyst Sulaiman Aledeh said many in the country are growing frustrated with the authorities’ inability to contain the conflict.

“If you’ve seen [what happened to] Niger, President Mahamadou Issoufou had to sack his security chiefs when 89 soldiers were killed. So Nigerians are asking why are you keeping these people,” he told Al Jazeera from Lagos.

“The problem here has to do with the government of the day seems to be rewarding loyalty over professionalism. They [Nigerians] think by now the government should’ve tried a few good other men to get them out of this mess.”

‘So much suffering’

Earlier on Sunday, Borno Governor Babaganan Umara Zulum told journalists that at least 70 farmers were killed. He was speaking in Zabarmari village after attending the burial of 43 people whose bodies were recovered on Saturday.

Zulum urged the federal government to recruit more soldiers, Civilian Joint Task Force members and civil defence fighters to protect farmers in the region.

He described people facing desperate choices.

“In one side, they stay at home they may be killed by hunger and starvation; on the other, they go out to their farmlands and risk getting killed by the insurgents,” he said.

Bulama Bukarti, an analyst at the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change, said the failure to control Boko Haram has devastated lives and the economy.

“The security forces are obviously losing this war,” he told Al Jazeera, describing 2019 as “the deadliest year” for Nigerian security forces since Boko Haram’s armed campaign started in 2009.

“About 800 security forces were killed, mostly in the first half of last year, and the Nigerian military responded by changing its strategy introducing what they called the ‘super camp strategy’ by which they withdrew soldiers from remote communities and rural areas and consolidated them in what they call ‘super camps’ in order to reduce military fatalities,” Bukarti said.

“The strategy succeeded in reducing military fatalities but the side-effect of that is that the Nigerian military has effectively surrendered control of rural Nigeria to Boko Haram fighters.

“You have Boko Haram ruling northeastern Nigeria and criminal gangs ruling the rural communities of northwestern Nigeria; this has a devastating effect on Nigeria’s economy and the future of the country entirely.”

Speaking to Al Jazeera from Maiduguri, Vincent Lelei, the UN’s deputy humanitarian coordinator for Nigeria, said people in the region “live in extreme fear” amid the prolonged crisis “which has led to so much suffering, so much displacement and destruction of livelihoods”.

“Borno state is a state with very good soil, there is a lot of water on the ground, and a lot of crops grow very quickly,” he said. “Given the opportunity, the livelihoods of the people could recover so quickly – but this insecurity, this problem of violence against unarmed civilians is reducing those opportunities.”

SOURCE : AL JAZEERA AND NEWS AGENCIES

Bianca opens up on what Biafra warlord, Ojukwu told her about Nigeria’s survival

Bianca Ojukwu, Nigeria’s former Ambassador to Spain, has opened up on what her late husband, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu, told her about Nigeria’s unity and survival as a political entity.

Mrs. Bianca Ojukwu said her late husband always lamented the fact that Nigeria seemed incapable of lifting itself out of mediocrity and degeneration, adding that it paid lip service to national unity and constructive development.”

She told Sun Newspaper that her late husband would feel vindicated in the spirit world, particularly with the rise in the clamour for restructuring.

She noted that the country is stumbling from one crisis to another, adding that today Nigerians are witnesses to the situation Ojukwu anticipated and warned against so long ago.

“He always maintained that the unity of any country that is guaranteed solely by force of arms cannot be sustained and that Nigeria’s unity can only be assured if oppression and marginalization of certain of its ethnicities is addressed and resolved.

“Since those who are continually denied justice have no interest in peace it goes without saying that in a matter of time pent-up frustrations erupt and explode like a keg of gunpowder. Dim Ojukwu has come to be known as the man who saw ahead of his time,” she added.

She said that nothing concrete has been done by the government to change the situation since her husband’s predictions, adding that Ojukwu was one of the earliest advocates of restructuring.

According to her, the late Biafra warlord knew without doubts that the 1960 independence was a distorted and unbalanced package of federalism

She said Ojukwu till his death kept hammering on the fact that in order for the country to survive, it must equitably accommodate all its federating units.

Senator Abbo Marks Defection By Taking Third Wife

By Doris Israel

Nigeria’s youngest member of the Senate, Elisha Abbo who won a reputation after he was involved in a brawl at an Abuja sex toy shop has married a third wife.

The senator remarkably announced the marriage just about the same time as he consummated his political marriage to the All Progressives Congress, APC to which he defected to the same Wednesday.

Abbo took to Facebook to announce his marriage to Dr. Stacey Power on Wednesday, November 25.

The same day was also the birthday of his second wife, Emily Ishaku.

Senator Abbo said the journey with the third wife started few years ago when they where best friends but that they have now become husband and wife, despite the opposition from home and abroad.

He wrote:

“Few years ago we started this journey as friends. Today despite oppositions home and abroad we ended up as best friends – husband and wife.

I love you Dr Stacey P Power, Who today traditionally becomes Dr Stacey Ishaku Abbo ( Dr SIA)

The battle of love is won – Love always wins.

I thank our family and friends, the good people of Numan and indeed the Bwatiye nation for your support.

God bless you all”.

Recall that the Senator recently defeted from the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) to the All Progressives Congress (APC).

Abbo explained that he left the Peoples Democratic Party to join the All Progressives Congress, in order to pursue his 2023 governorship ambition.

 Abbo, whose letter of defection was read on the floor of the Senate by the Senate President, Ahmad Lawan, on Wednesday, however insisted at a news conference after plenary, that there is a major crisis in the partly in Adamawa State.

He also said he was not ready to resign as a Senator as was demanded by the PDP.

National Publicity Secretary of the PDP, Kola Ologbondiyan, while reacting to Abbos defection said,

“Senator Abbo, is fully aware of the constitutional implication of his decision to defect to another party;  which is that, he cannot continue to occupy the seat of the PDP in the Senate.

Police arrest drunken Police Inspector on viral video in Abuja.

The Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Abuja, Police Command has arrested an Inspector, who was seen to be drunk in a viral video on social media.

Police Public Relations Officer, ASP Yusuf Mariam, in a statement on Sunday, said the policeman would be subjected to psychological and medical evaluation, preparatory to commencement of disciplinary actions against him.

The statement reads: “Following the viral video of the ‘Drunk Policeman’ at CBN Junction, the FCT Police Command has identified, arrested and taken into custody the Police Inspector shown in the video.

“Furthermore, the Commissioner of Police CP. Bala Ciroma has ordered that the Police officer be subjected to psychological and medical evaluation, preparatory to the commencement of disciplinary actions against him.

“In view of the above, the Commissioner of Police wishes to unequivocally state that the behaviour portrayed by the Policeman in the video does not depict the standard discipline of the Nigeria Police Force.

“While urging residents to remain calm, the Command wishes to reiterate its unflinching commitment to the protection of lives and property in the Federal Capital Territory.”

Trump’s coup failed – but US democracy has been given a scare

The president pulled every lever to stay in power. It didn’t work, but how would the US handle a closer election?

In the end, the coup did not take place. In the most grudging manner possible, Donald Trump signalled on Monday night that the transition of power could begin.

That, a White House official told reporters, was as close as Trump will probably ever come to concession, but the machinery of transition has gathered momentum. Joe Biden’s incoming administration now has a government internet domain, is being briefed by government agencies and is due to receive federal funding.

The Pentagon quickly announced it would be providing support for the transfer of power. And one by one, senior Republicans – an especially timid category – are recognising the election result.

But there is no doubt US democracy has been given a scare. As the sense of imminent threat begins to fade, the convoluted inner workings of the electoral system are coming under scrutiny to determine whether it was as robust as its advocates had hoped – or whether the nation simply got lucky this time.

“I had long been in the camp of people who believed that the guardrails of democracy were working,” Katrina Mulligan, a former senior official in the justice department’s national security division. “But my view has actually shifted in the last few weeks as I watched some of this stuff play out. Now I actually think that we are depending far too much on fragile parts of our democracy, and expecting individuals, rather than institutions, to do the work the institution should be doing.”

Trump made no secret of his gameplan even before the election, and it has come into sharper focus with every madcap day since: cast doubt on the reliability of postal ballots, claim victory on election night before most of them were counted, and then sow enough confusion with allegations, justice department investigations and street mayhem with far-right militias to delay certification of the results.

Such a delay would create an opportunity for Republican-run state legislatures to step in and select their own electors to send to the electoral college, which formally decides who becomes president. That would produce a constitutional crisis that would ultimately be settled by the supreme court, which has a 6-3 Republican majority and has become increasingly politicised. For the plan to work it required political fealty to trump actual votes but, at several crucial decision points, that did not happen.

The key ingredient for a classic coup – a politically motivated military – was absent from the start, though not for want of Trump’s efforts. He tried to bring active duty troops on to the streets to quell the Black Lives Matter protests in the summer, but the defence secretary, Mark Esper, refused to cooperate.

After Esper was fired in the wake of the election, and Trump loyalists were installed in senior decision-making positions, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, General Mark Milley, used a planned public appearance at the dedication of an army museum to send a pointed message.

“We take an oath to the constitution,” Milley said. “We do not take an oath to a king or a queen, a tyrant or a dictator.”

The statement was greeted with some relief – but what was most striking was that it needed to be said at all.

The next lever of power that Trump tried to yank was the justice department and the FBI. The attorney general, William Barr, authorised US attorneys to conduct investigations into alleged voter fraud if there are “clear and apparently-credible allegations of irregularities”.

The opening of such investigations would have supercharged conspiracy theories and given more cover for state-level Republicans to delay certification of the votes. But justice department prosecutors rebelled. The official in charge of investigating electoral crimes, Richard Pilger, resigned and others made their objections public.

“The justice department, more than most institutions, is staffed by people who have a real healthy understanding of what democracy is and why it’s worth saving,” Mulligan, now national director for national security at the Center for American Progress, said. She added that the clarity of Biden’s win made it even less likely justice department officials would go along with such a dubious enterprise.

The next line of defence was state-level Republican officials involved in the machinery of certifying results. They came under intense pressure, including in a couple of cases a direct call from the president. In some cases, notably in Michigan, they buckled, but in most states they held firm, as in the case of the Georgia secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, who confirmed Biden’s slim majority of victory and consequently became a pariah in his own party.

“Some folks here deserve medals and some simply met an extremely low bar,” said Rebecca Ingber, a former state department legal counsel, now professor at Cardozo law school. “This is a story about guardrails working, but it’s also a reminder about the fragility of those guardrails. At the end of the day, we are talking about humans, not robots.”

Similarly, even the most conservative judges turned away the fanciful claims of election fraud pursued by the Trump legal team, whose current score in the courts is one win and 35 losses.

It is possible more competent plotters could have done more damage. Trump appears to have left it until after the election to assemble a legal team, and ultimately handed control to his fiercely loyal, but erratic and hapless personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani.

Ultimately Biden’s margin of victory (over 6 million nationwide and tens of thousands in most of the battlegrounds) was so clear, and evidence of fraud so slight, that even with better lawyers, the legal channel would have been near impossible.

But the 2020 experience has raised concerns about how US democracy would weather a closer election, and a more disciplined group determined to wield the power of the state to steal it. The militias, who were not coordinated enough to emerge as the intimidatory force Trump hoped for, could be stronger on the next occasion.

“President Trump’s rhetoric appealing to these groups has been dangerous from day one of his campaign, giving these groups tacit support for their illegal activities. And the lacklustre law enforcement response to public violence committed by these groups has exacerbated that problem,” said Michael German, a fellow at the Brennan Center for Justice and who as an FBI special agent was tasked with infiltrating extremist groups. “Their ability to organise and recruit and test tactics and networks has been strengthened. So once there is an effort to police them, they will be much more difficult a problem.”

The 2020 election has also exposed a rapidly spreading rot in the foundation of the system – public confidence that it is fair. Some 70% of Republicans, despite the clear certified results, believe the vote was rigged.

“I do think we got lucky,” said Susan Hennessey, a former lawyer at the National Security Agency and executive editor of the Lawfare blog. “The dog didn’t bark but this was not for lack of trying and had circumstances been a little bit different, and had the margin been a little bit closer, I think we have a really clear demonstration that normative constraints are not going to prevent people from taking profoundly undemocratic measures.”

Theguardian

Why is Buhari still keeping the failed service chiefs?

#ZabarmariMassacre! The farm is a place of sowing and reaping, and the most unlikeliest haunt of the grim reaper. But at least 43 citizens who went harvesting on their farm in Borno on Saturday had their souls harvested by the emissaries of hell — Boko Haram.

How many more will have to die before the conscience of President Muhammadu Buhari is stirred to do the most expedient thing regarding the failed service chiefs?

In December 2018, Boko Haram insurgents pulled a blitzkrieg on military formations in Baga, Borno state, sacking the headquarters of the multinational joint task force and taking over the place (briefly). The group steadied its onslaughts on military formations, killing many soldiers, weeks after.

At least, 18 soldiers were killed in an ambush on Maiduguri road on December 26, 2018, in one of Boko Haram’s mortal offensives. The group also persisted in inflicting attritive damages on the civilian population in the north-east. The killings and destruction never let up; in fact, they had taken an upward trajectory since the current service chiefs were appointed.

But what did Buhari say and do in the heat of the killing of soldiers, civilians and attack on military barracks and equipment?

This is what he said in an interview on Arise TV in January, 2019 – a few days after the attacks: “The head [him] has to be very careful on removal of the service chiefs because you don’t know [the] ambition of the ones coming up. I didn’t know them on [a] personal basis, I followed records and thought I picked the best then, of course, their performance may be disappointing but I accept responsibility for not changing them. My reason is based on my own experience.”

Now, compare Buhari’s complacent remarks to the action of President Issoufou Mahamadou of Niger Republic, who sacked his security chiefs after 89 soldiers were killed by terrorists in January, 2020.

My theory is, Buhari is keeping the service chiefs, who have failed in their duty, out of self-preservation. He is prioritising loyalty over competence because he still sees the wraith of the 1985 coup in which he was deposed. Boko Haram can sack the entire north-east, but the president will still keep the security chiefs. He considers any threat to his office of far greater concern than any threat to the lives of Nigerians.

In its resolution of January 16, 2020, the European parliament, legislative branch of the European Union, affirmed what many Nigerians know. It said there has not been any progress in the fight against Boko Haram insurgents.

Commenting on Boko Haram’s abominations, the parliament said the security situation in Nigeria has deteriorated significantly.

“Condemns in particular the recent increase in violence against ethnic and religious communities, including the targeting of religious institutions and worshippers. Deplores that progress has stalled in the fight against Boko Haram, ISWAP and the increased occurrence and severity of suicide attacks and direct attacks against military positions; recalls that Nigeria’s President Buhari was re-elected in 2019 on the promise of defeating the violent extremism promoted by Boko Haram and other terror groups, and urges the President to implement his campaign promises,’’ it said.

In these few weeks, the insurgents have executed a series of attacks on civilians and the military.

On Christmas eve (of December 2019), a faction of Boko Haram affiliated to the Islamic State, killed 11 Christian captives in Borno, saying the action was taken to avenge the deaths of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the late IS leader and Abul-Hasan Al-Muhajir, its spokesman, who were killed in Syria in October.

On January 21, Lawan Andimi, chairman of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) in Michika local government area in Adamawa, was tragically dispatched by Boko Haram. Also, Daciya Dalep, a student of the University of Maiduguri, was killed in the most infernal manner.

But how did Nigeria’s army chief respond to these tragedies? He described the attacks as the ‘’last kick of a dying horse’’. But I wonder why this horse is not yet dead – even as the military claims the insurgents have been technically defeated.

Really, Boko Haram appears vitalised by every daring attack. On January 7, a driver attached to Olusegun Adeniyi, commander of operation Lafiya Dole (the war campaign), was killed in a derring-do attack by Boko Haram insurgents on the commander’s convoy.

The insurgents attacked Adeniyi, a major-general, who was on his way back to Maiduguri after a visit to Jakana in Borno state, where they had struck earlier.

What is derisory is that two of the service chiefs and the national security adviser are from the north-east – the theatre of the war. But rather than extirpate the menaces to the peace in the zone, two of the security chiefs are fixated on establishing military universities in their hometowns.

To me, it is clear the security chiefs have failed in the one task for which they were appointed. And I think, it is time they take a bow. In Old Japan, generals who fail in war take themselves out by hara-kiri. Not that our own generals should, but the president must prioritise the security of Nigerians over himself and let these men go.

Editor’s note: This article was first written and published in January 2020 but has been republished with slight modifications — an update from the latest killings in Borno.

#ZabarmariMassacre

Fredrick Nwabufo is a writer and journalist.
@FredrickNwabufo

Of Lies, Lai Mohammed And CNN

 Is Nigeria better in any way than the day President Muhammadu Buhari was inaugurated as President? What do the economic indices say? Is the pump price of petrol lower today than that day? Is the price of food lower than it was that day? Is the cost of transportation better than it was that day? Are school fees lower than they were on that day? 

Well, as man does not live on bread alone, we could look at the indices of another section, which dwell not on food but on life itself; I mean national security. Is life now more secure than it was on the day Buhari assumed the huge weight of the Presidency office? Has he tamed the Boko Haram insurgency? What about the killer version called of an otherwise harmless group called herdsmen? Has that been checked in anyway? Has it even been condemned? Has the Police focused on it in any way? And hey, the bandits are still not only running riot, the problem they have caused appear insurmountable. 

The result is that Nigeria has been unable to provide what the Roman Empire provided for those it governed even before Jesus Christ was born. Please think about this: though those who lived in the Roman Empire, thousands of years ago travelled freely, Nigerians are afraid of moving from one town to another because of kidnappers, bandits and killer herdsmen, who abandon the flock to seek easy cash – kidnapping. 

With all this in the country, another problem was added, a totally avoidable one, police brutality. That was exactly what led to the #ENDSARS protests. 

And it was the reporting of how the #ENDSARS protesters were shot, yes, shot and not dispersed, that have elicited s spat between our Minister of Information and Culture, Alhaji Lai Mohamed. How were the protesters fired at? With blank bullets or with live ones? It is this shameful debate that Mohammed has entered into with the Cable News Network (CNN). Should soldiers have gone on a mission at all at that Lekki Toll Gate arena where the protesters, peaceful and peaceable protesters had converged? No, is the obvious answer. The Police should have been the force to be called in. They could have even come with their water cannons. But to have sent in soldiers? That beats every imagination.

The second issue: Why did President Muhammadu Buhari bypass, say a great communicator, newspaper Editor extraordinaire, a man with self-restraint, a man who would not embrace a lie that would otherwise deceive the people, an entire nation, just would serve the narrow end of politics, and go on to appoint one who would say anything to advance a temporary advantage in any situation? Here, to leave no one in doubt, I am talking about Prince Tony Momoh and Alhaji Lai Mohammed. 

Well, the answer is easy; in the heat of the election that threw up the All Progressives Congress (APC) to defeat the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) in 2015, it had appeared Mohammed possessed the power to move mountains by the words that dropped from his mouth. In 2015, Lai Mohammed was seemingly an all-conquering star. An election campaign was on, it was akin to a war, and so truth had been banished as the parties fought for the votes of the people. 

Ah, that was 2015. The election of 2019 was totally a different thing. Many Nigerians, who had believed in the APC four years earlier, cannot claim that there was no evidence that the god they had embraced had feet of clay. Or perhaps they had hoped in the human capacity that could have enabled the APC officials to change their ruinous ways. If so, the hope has proved false.

Third; the Mr. Lai Mohammed who was deemed a superstar years back did not appear to appreciate that massive changes have taken place. The first change is that the APC cannot go on indefinitely blaming the PDP for everything. For instance, as the APC has been the party in power for five years, it has to take responsibility for what has recently gone wrong in the country- things such as the failure to rein in the Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS). It was the general high-handedness and alleged extra-judicial killings that sparked the protests. 

Fourth, showing that he has lessons to learn, he is right at this period threatening to deal with the CNN. Deal with CNN? Really? How far could a joke be taken? Please, mark that the operative word phrase here “is to deal with”. What will he do to CNN? 

Ah, when some people face dire straits, they go hysterical. Now, in year 2020, the game has changed and Lia Mohammed and those he works for, do not know it. But I am concerned with an outcome more terrible than self-delusion, whether personal or collective. 

History is replete with advisers who deceived their leaders and told them only what they would love to hear. This could be taken too far. In some moments of candidness, could Alhaji Mohammed please study the life of Joseph Goebbels. It has been argued that if there was no Goebbels, there would have been no Adolf Hitler. Historians and analysts have been wondering what could have happened if Goebbels did not call for total war in Berlin in 1943. Could Hitler have surrendered and saved the world, especially Germany, unnecessary destruction? 

1943; the cause of the war had changed and Germany was at the receiving end as the Russians had not only stopped the German advance against her but winning battle after battle on the march to Berlin. Allied bombing raids were on, destroying the Reich, burning cities. The Nazi regime was under pressure to surrender but the Propaganda Minister, Goebbels, wanted to win public support, for a total war, to fight till the very end. He did and he won the support of the people – to lead them to a mass suicide. 

He announced to a packed stadium: “The English claim that the German people are against the government’s total war strategy. The English say the people don’t want total war that they want to surrender.” 

SABINE BOEBE: “The audience was stirred up about innocent women and children and violating the public and carpeting our German homeland with bombs. And, of course, this fed the anger in the crowd. And when the questions came and the shouting started, all control was lost.” 

GOEBBELS: “Do you want total war?” Loading…

NARRATOR: Goebbels’ deceitful presentation fulfils its purpose. 

BRUNHILDE POMSEL: “We were absolutely aghast that it was possible to move this overcrowded stadium into a frenzied delirium, just asking such a question: Do you want total war? Yes! Yes! All this screaming. It was a grim experience. We stood there, paralyzed. One of the people standing with us said ‘Clap! You must clap!’” 

GOEBBELS: “If necessary, do you want a war more total and radical than anything that we can even imagine today?” 

BOEBE: “I couldn’t imagine anything being more total. Were we to not sleep at all now, have nothing at all to eat, see all the men killed, the civilian population too? I just couldn’t imagine an escalation. It was horrible enough!” 

GOEBBELS: “Now, people, rise up and let the storm break loose!” 

In the end, the total war, however, led to defeat. 

That speech at a Nazi rally on 18 February 1943 at the Berlin Sportpalast, with a bold sign, in capitals, that read “Totaler Krieg – Kürzester Krieg” (“Total War – Shortest War”),made in a packed stadium, has gone down in history as the “Sportpalast speech” (German: Sportpalastrede) 

Now hear this: the speech was made to a large, carefully selected audience on 18 February 1943! So, those faithful to Hitler were those who, pretending to be the German people that responded the exact way he wanted them to respond. And in the same way, some journalists, beholden to APC have been claiming to speak for Nigeria. Take this quotation: “Although Goebbels claimed that the audience included people from “all classes and occupations” (including “soldiers, doctors, scientists, artists, engineers and architects, teachers, white collars”), the propagandist had carefully selected his listeners to react with appropriate fanaticism. Goebbels said to Albert Speer that it was the best-trained audience one could find in Germany. However, the enthusiastic and unified crowd response recorded in the written version is, at times, not fully supported by the recording. 

It is considered the most famous of Joseph Goebbels’s speeches. The speech was the first public admission by the Nazi leadership that Germany faced serious dangers. Goebbels called for a total war (German: totaler Krieg) to secure victory over the Allies, and exhorted the German people to continue the war even though it would be long and difficult because—as he asserted—both Germany’s survival and the survival of a non-Bolshevist Europe were at stake. 

Germany lost that war… but both Germany and Europe have survived. When I think of Lai Mohammed, I ask, why he has not been made a Minister of Propaganda. My prayer is this: may he not lead Buhari and Nigeria astray. 

And on his spat with CNN, he is just blowing against the wind. And about the truth; the truth will reveal itself. No force on earth can hide it, not CNN, not the Army, not Lai Mohammed, not the social media. A panel is on to get to the truth; I will wait for it to finish its duties. But we should not disgrace Nigeria by the way we talk. 

Jide Oluwajuyitan, not I, wrote this: “I sympathise with Lai Mohammed, our very resourceful Minister of Information but a victim of President Buhari’s self-inflicted crisis of legitimacy. Transiting from a creative party spokesman that battled PDP in a fiercely fought 2015 election, to a government information minister, it was obvious he would be haunted by his past. And serving an elected president with a mind-set of an emir exercising authority based on tradition was to be an information minister’s nightmare. Of course, it did not take long before defeated and injured PDP and its powerful media re-christened Lai Mohammed “Lying Mohammed”. 

Unfortunately precisely because President Buhari and his loyal gatekeepers did not understand that communication, which Karl Deutch (1963) describes as ‘nerves of government’ and a guide to statecraft for the modern prince, has implications for perception and interpretation of government messages, he reappointed Lai Mohammed as minister of information”. In defence of Lai Mohammed” in The Nation newspaper of November 26, 2020. 

I Spend At Least 3 Days In A Month In Yobe — Gov. Buni Replies Critics

Mai Mala Buni, governor of Yobe, says he spends at least three days in a month in the state.

Speaking in an interview with the BBC, the governor said he carries out his duties effectively even when he is not in the state.

Buni was reacting to criticism that he has been largely absent from the state since he took over as the caretaker chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC).

He added that his duty in the ruling party is not hindering his efforts to discharge his responsibilities.

“On the issue of staying, there is no way I can spend a month without spending three or four days in Yobe state. And then even if I return to Yobe, I won’t advertise or make it public that today I will be in Yobe and tomorrow I will be leaving,” the governor said.

“Wait, Let me land, listen to me, I won’t be revealing to the public that I came to Yobe or when I am leaving. And at this age of technology, when will anybody say that there were bunch of files waiting for me? Even before I came here I don’t know the numbers (of files I treated).”

Thenigerialawyer

NDLEA deplores high rate of drug abuse in Imo

The National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) has expressed concern over increasing rate of drug abuse among youths in Imo State.

Its Deputy Commander, Operations and Intelligence, Kayode Raji, stated this during an interactive programme on Understanding the Freedom of Information Act, Curbing The Increasing Rape, Gender Violence and Drug Abuse, organised by the National Orientation Agency (NOA).

He explained that the aim of the forum was to find ways of collaboration between the NOA and other stakeholders in addressing social vices in the state.

Raji said the NDLEA in the state had observed an increasing number of youths in its custody who are undergoing rehabilitation from misuse of drugs and other illicit substances.

He said the Agency had stepped up sensitisation on the health hazards of drug abuse and its social implications, noting that the NOA had been involved in the fight against illicit drugs.

State Director of NOA, Vitus Ekeocha, noted that ignorance was a major challenge in the fight against rape, gender-based violence and drug abuse, adding that the agency was poised to work closely with other stakeholders in ridding the society of the menace.

Imo State Commissioner for Information and Strategy, Declan Emelumba, who was represented by a Director in the Ministry, Kennedy Amanze, stressed the need for transparency in governance, noting that citizens should get acquainted with facts at all times.

He said the state government was desirous of finding ways of curbing drug abuse, rape and gender-based violence.

Representative of the National Council of Women Societies (NCWS) in the state Mrs. Chizoba Okafor, canvassed speedy passage of the Violence Against Persons Prohibition Bill currently before the legislature to guarantee women’s rights.

She said no fewer than 140 cases of rape were reported in the state during the COVID-19 lock down and appealed to traditional rulers to support the cause of women.

In his paper on Freedom of Information Act, Deputy Director of NOA, Nazzy Njoku, charged states yet to domesticate the act to do so, while laws that conflict with the FOI Act should be repealed to ensure its smooth operation.

guardian

TIPS