By Fred Obi
The recent declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State by President Bola Tinubu has raised fundamental questions about the limits of executive power, the rule of law, and the integrity of democratic institutions in Nigeria.
Firstly, it is essential to acknowledge that the President’s decision is not entirely unprecedented. Former Presidents Olusegun Obasanjo and Goodluck Jonathan have also declared states of emergency in various states, albeit in response to clear and present dangers to national security or public safety.
However, a critical examination of President Tinubu’s speech preceding the declaration reveals a glaring bias against Governor Siminalayi Fubara. The President’s failure to address the numerous provocative statements made by Nyesom Wike, including his arrogant insults against various stakeholders and the sociopolitical group of the South-South PANDEF, is a clear indication of a skewed narrative.
The selective approach to addressing the crisis in Rivers State undermines the legitimacy of the President’s decision and raises concerns about his commitment to upholding the rule of law and protecting democratic institutions.
Furthermore, the President’s decision to suspend Governor Fubara and other officials for six months without due process or recourse to the judiciary is a blatant disregard for the principles of federalism and the separation of powers. This move has far-reaching implications for the stability of the state and the country at large.
It is crucial to note that the 1999 Constitution, as amended, provides clear guidelines for the declaration of a state of emergency. Section 305(1) states that the President can declare a state of emergency “if satisfied that a situation has arisen which requires immediate attention.”
However, the Constitution also emphasizes the importance of consultation with the National Assembly and the need for clear justification. In this case, the President’s decision appears to be driven more by political considerations than a genuine concern for public safety or national security.
Findings have revealed that it is becoming extremely difficult for the Rivers State Chief Judge to address the case of misconduct leveled against the Governor and his deputy. This has led to speculation that the President’s declaration of a state of emergency is an unconstitutional back-door approach to forcefully remove a democratically elected government. This is a clear abuse of power and a threat to democratic institutions.
The declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State is a deeply troubling development that has significant implications for the future of democracy in Nigeria. The President’s biased approach, disregard for due process, and failure to uphold the rule of law undermine the legitimacy of his decision and raise concerns about the potential for abuse of power.
As a concerned citizen of this great Nation, it is essential that we demand a more nuanced and balanced approach to addressing the crisis in Rivers State, one that prioritizes the rule of law, democratic institutions, and the well-being of the people.
Comr. Fred Obi
(Agu Dini Obi)
Historian, Political Analyst and Public Commentator
