By Douglas Ogbankwa, Esq.
The Nigerian state stands on a tripod of the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary which powers of each organ of government is properly delineated in Sections 4,5 and 6 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (As Amended )
Sadly, of the three arms of government, the Judiciary is both financially and administratively emasculated by the Governors who see the Judiciary albeit wrongly as a parastatal under their Government Houses.
In most states of the federation, the Judiciary goes cap in hand to the Government Houses through their Chief Registrars, waiting to get the Governors to approve funds for the same Judges they have cases in their Courts! What a misnomer and an anathema of a gargantuan proportion!
The Governors control the purse and the sword in Nigeria. In a country like ours where the Governors act as emperors running the state as personal empires the Judiciary is the only organ that moderates the excesses of the Governors.
Aware of these facts indicated above, all the 36 States’ Governors in Nigeria have desecrated the same Constitution they swore to protect, which in saner clime is an impeachable offence.
Section 121 (3) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (As Amended) is clear and unambiguous to the effect that All Monies standing to the credit of the Judiciary shall be paid directly to the Heads of Court.
Why is it difficult for Governors to obey this Section of the Constitution, but obey others that favour them? The reasons are not far-fetched.
Many of these Governors have skeletons in their cupboards and allowing the Judiciary to be financially independent is like handing over to the hangman a noose and a hood to execute you. The Governors know that once the Judiciary is independent, the blatant impunity with which they run the states in this era of the preponderance of Freedom of Information will be over.
I wish to tell the Government and their collaborators, some of whom are very senior lawyers, that the independence of the Judiciary is nigh and it shall happen quicker than they think.
The bar at the national and local levels needs to do something to protect the Judges from the perfidious invasion of the Judiciary by the Governors which is borne out of selfishness and in some cases outright callousness.
But the Judges have to do more to protect themselves. It is time for the setting up of an Association of Nigerian Judges as a pressure group to wade off the improper annexation of the Judiciary by the Governors.
The other day, a Governor sent vehicles to the Judiciary in a State in Nigeria and he attached the names of Judges to each of the vehicles.
What is the business of a Governor to purchase vehicles for the same Judges you have cases in their courts, some of which are even election related matters?
The Executive choose their SSG, Chief of Staff and Commissioners, the Legislature choose their Speaker and other principal officers, why should the Governors be choosing our Judges?
Some leaders of the bar have failed in this regard, in stopping the Executive from meddling in the appointment of Judges. Others are doing too little and most times too late to protect the Judiciary.
The relationship between the Judiciary and the bar is akin to those of the hen and the chick and Judiciary can not speak for itself, the Bar is there to protect the Judiciary against external aggression as now being dastardly perpetuated by the Governors.
When I was younger, you were called upon to serve in the Judiciary, judging from your track records in practice or in the lower Bench.
Now the lobbying to be a Judge with a Governor of the State makes you ask the question whether you are appointing a Judge for the Judiciary or a Judge for the Governor. How can a Judge that is so politically exposed in his appointment process do justice in this highly politically charged environment called Nigeria?
Some of our Bar Leaders are quiet to all these shenanigans which suggest that they are either cowards or accomplices.
We, as Lawyers, have no other profession. We can not allow a few people to control the Judiciary the way a puppeteer controls a puppet Budgeting is governance, he who feeds you, controls you and he who pays the piper controls the tune.
We have no reason to complain about obnoxious judgments when we are quiet in the face of obnoxious appointment processes for Judges. You can not sow cocoyam and reap yam.
The legal profession is modelled to protect the weak and moderate the strong. The Judiciary should also be quick to assert itself when cases challenging the illegalities of the Governors on any issue are brought before it.
The Judiciary most times panders to the whims and caprices of these Governors which further emboldens them to do more wrong without any fear of reprimand. We have had a few courageous Judges, but they have also paid the price when their retirement benefits are wickedly withheld by the Governors who now run the States as thin gods, forgetting they will leave power one day!
Justice Adolphous Karibe-Whyte (Justice of the Supreme Court, as he then was ) stated in the case of AG Federation v Guardian Newspapers LTD (1999) 9 NWLR Part 618 @ 87, if I may paraphrase, that in the face of tyranny, the Judiciary must rise up against the excesses of the Executive else the state will be subsumed to the dictatorship of one man.
Chief Gani Fawehinmin SAN of blessed memory captured aptly the place of Bar and Bench in the society when he unassailably stated that:
“The Legal Profession ought to be and must strive to remain the dependable bastion of hope, help and succour for the repressed, the oppressed and the suppressed in our society.”
About the Author:
Douglas Ogbankwa Esq.@douglasogbankwa@gmail.com is the Convener of Vanguard for the Independence of the Judiciary
