Dear NBA 1ST Vice President, in respect of your explanation, please consider these:
1️⃣ On 14 August 2022, 9 Members of the NBA-NECommittee submitted a petition against NBA-GS Joyce Oduah. Thus the 9 Members are the Accusers/Complainants .
2️⃣. The same 9 Members of the NBA-NECommittee acted as the Prosecutors of the same complaints (their own complaints) on 15 August 2022.
3️⃣. The same 9 Members of the NBA-NECommittee sat as judges/arbiters over the trial proceedings and the same 9 Members convicted/suspended the same NBA-GS, púrsuant to s. 9(6)(b) NBA Constitution, on 15 August 2022.
4️⃣. The same 9 Members of the NBA-NECommitteeare acting as Appellants and Judges in the case, referred the matter to the NBA-NECouncil.
5️⃣. On 21 August 2022, the same 9 Members of the NBA-NECommittee proceeded to preside over the appellate trial Proceedings (NBA-NEC meeting) which, in total disregard of pending FHC suit number: FHC/ABJ/CS/1426/2022, on the subject, still re-suspended the same NBA-GS over the same complaint (their own complaint), púrsuant to section 20 (1) of the NBA Constitution.
◾Accordingly, as far as the case against NBA-GS Joyce Oduah is concerned, the same 9 members of the NBA-NECommittee constituted themselves into
▪️1). The Accusers/Complainants;
▪️2). The Prosecutors;
▪️3). The Trial Court; and
▪️4). The Appellants; and
▪️5). Presiding Justices at the Appellate Court (the NBA-NECOUNCIL was the appellate court) on 21 August 2022.
Now, you, the NBA-1st-Vive-President has come out here trying to explain to us why the 9 Members of the NBA-NECommittee were right in all that they’ve done.
Okay 👌.
Best wishes..
Respectfully,
Sylvester Udemezue (Udems)
