By Brian Clowes, Human Life International
Many people worry about what is happening in Africa and in Nigeria, especially the people who live there. But worrying is not enough. It has never accomplished anything. Even knowledge is not enough. By itself, knowledge can accomplish nothing. We must take action on our knowledge.
In order to be informed, so that we can take action, we have to answer four questions in this order;
- What is happening to our nation?
- How is it happening?
- Who is doing these things? and
- What can we do about it?
Question 1: What is Happening to Nigeria?
Nigeria has managed to hold off the effects of population control successfully so far, but this may change soon. The United Nations Population Information Network (POPIN) shows that the average Nigerian woman had nearly seven children per family 30 years ago. It is now about six children per woman. But this will rapidly decrease with the contraception and abortion flooding the country; there will be only 3.6 children per Nigerian woman in 30 years, replacement fertility at 2.2 children per woman in 60 years, and far below replacement fertility by 2100.
Why is the number of children per family decreasing so rapidly?
The very rapidly decreasing number of children per family is only one of the many symptoms of an infection by the Culture of Death, the deadliest disease of all. The Culture of Death not only weakens, corrupts and kills individual people, it destroys millions of families and even entire nations and continents, like Europe.
How can you tell if something is from the Culture of Death? See if it weakens the family. Everything the Culture of Death offers to us under the guise of “rights” and “freedoms” attacks and breaks one of the links of the family.
It helps to clarify if we see the family as a group of people linked to each other by chains of love and responsibility. As long as those links stay strong, the family stays strong. First, the husband and wife are linked in marriage, which is the unity of one man and one woman open to life through procreation. The husband and wife in turn have children they love and protect, and they themselves are the children of their own parents, or grandparents in this case. And we must never forget the most important member of every family, God Himself.
To begin with, there are many things the Culture of Death offers us to attack the procreative link between husband and wife. These include all abuses of the reproductive system, such as contraception, sterilization, abortion, masturbation and homosexuality.
To destroy the unitive link between husband and wife, their commitment to each other, the Culture of Death offers us divorce, adultery, pornography and prostitution. The Culture of Death sees all of these evils as “fundamental human rights.”
The Culture of Death attempts to separate children from their parents by trying to force them to have more liberal attitudes. This is done with explicit sexual education, “values clarification,” which is designed to present exercises that direct the child towards secular attitudes, and secret counseling of children deemed troublesome (i.e., who have traditional values).
As the grandparents get older, the Culture of Death claims that they have the right to kill themselves through physician-assisted suicide and “death with dignity.” This is because they are seen as useless and unproductive to society.
Since belief in God is the most powerful antidote to the Culture of Death, it attacks this belief in many ways, including atheism, agnosticism, “New Age” silliness and indifferentism, the strange belief that there are many ways to Heaven other than Jesus Christ.
The final result of all of this is what has happened in North America and Europe. Everybody thinks that they are independent, owe nobody else anything, do not care for anyone else, and just look out for themselves. And, most importantly, you can see from the picture that God has no place among the people any more.
• Everyone believes that they are thinking for themselves;
• Everyone believes they are independent;
• Everyone is a bundle of “rights;”
• Everyone believes they have “choices;”
• Everyone believes that they are free;
• But this is when they are most easily controlled. This is when they become dependent on the government for their living and the media for their opinions.
As the poet and philosopher Johann Wolfgang von Goethe said, “None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.”
Question 2: How is This Happening?
What is the overall agenda of the population control movement?
The Senegalese novelist Hamodou Kane coined the expression “colonization of the mind.”
He said that there are basically two ways to control a people. The traditional method of control is through brute force. The primary drawback of this method is that, when a nation uses force to subdue others, it must continually restrain the people from resisting and revolting.
A more permanent solution is to get the people to accept new attitudes through a systematic program of targeted corruption and propaganda. Once the saturation campaign has succeeded, the populace controls itself. The best part is that the people think that they arrive at important decisions on their own ― when, in reality, they are being manipulated in subtle but powerful ways by outside forces.
We see this happening all over the world today, especially in the Southern Hemisphere.
Of course, “colonization of the mind” must necessarily destroy the identity of the targeted people and make them imitate their conquerors. In other words, the indigenous population eagerly participates in its own mass absorption into another culture.
While the population controllers talk endlessly about “celebrating diversity,” they are the greatest destroyers of cultural diversity in history as they impose American and European values and practices on the people of Latin America, Africa, the Caribbean and Asia.
Pope Francis is well aware of this deadly trend. He has said that “This is the ideological colonization: They enter into a people with an idea that has nothing to do with the people; yes, with a group of people, but not with the people, and they colonize the people with an idea that changes or that wants to change a mentality or a structure. Think of the Balilla (Fascist youth organization), think of the Hitler youth. They colonized the people, they wanted to do it. But how much suffering! The people should not lose their freedom. The people have their culture, their history; each people have their own culture.”
Now contrast this view with that of Nafis Sadik, the former Executive Director of the United Nations Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA), one of the three largest population control groups in the world, who has claimed that “If culture and tradition are invoked to hold back change, and we hear this all the time, then culture and tradition must give way.” This is typical of the imperialistic attitudes of the population controllers — if you do not believe as they do, you will simply be forced to believe as they do. Your culture, your traditions, your religion, your beliefs do not matter at all, according to these people.
And how about former American Vice President and leading global warming alarmist Al Gore? He said that “It is the job of global philanthropists to impose fertility management on Africa.” In the United States, we talk about “managing” the fertility of cattle and insects, never people. So why does he use this term on Africans? Does he think that Africans are cattle or insect pests? And notice the use of the term “impose,” which means that Africans will have no choice in deciding their own fertility.
The “traditional” method of conquering a nation involved taking it over by sheer force of arms, using bombers, tanks, grenades and firearms. This is no longer acceptable in the eyes of the world, so we have to use different methods. We occupy the minds of the people partly by making them hate their God-given gift of fertility. Our modern-day weapons are condoms, IUDs, Depo-Provera, birth control pills, and Norplant.
In the late 1800s, Europe occupied almost all of Africa. Seven nations (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom) had carved up most of the continent among themselves and occupied the land for the purpose of pillaging and exporting its natural resources.
These European nations, along with North America, are still pillaging the natural resources of Africa, but can no longer occupy the continent with the use of force. The names of the occupying nations have been replaced by the names of the occupying pharmaceutical corporations, but the situation is still the same.
In 1890, seven European nations occupied almost the entire continent of Africa. They each had large armies that “kept the peace” in the countries that they had taken over. The arms manufacturers grew fat and rich as the wars continued. They had names like Bridesburg, Colt, Enfield, Krupp, Mannlicher, Mauser and Winchester.
In 2015, after more than a century, nothing has changed. Seven Western nations still occupy almost the entire continent of Africa — The United States, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Japan, Germany, Sweden and France, which have donated 82 percent of the 102 billion population control dollars that have pouring into Africa since 1995 [Excel spreadsheet F-18-05]. The armies these Western nations are now the population control non-governmental organizations, or NGOs. There are over one hundred major NGOs involved in population suppression in Africa. The best-known of these are the single-purpose pro-abortion groups such as Marie Stopes International, the International Planned Parenthood Federation, Pathfinder International, EngenderHealth and the United Nations Population Fund, or UNFPA. But there are many other NGOs that also participate in large-scale population suppression as a secondary mission. These include Adventist Development and Relief Agency International (ADRA), Africare, the Global Fund [to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria] Médecins sans Frontières (Doctors without Borders), and the Young Women’s Christian Association, or YWCA. The “arms manufacturers” now have names like are Lilly Pharmaceuticals, OrthoMcNeil, Pfizer, Upjohn and Wyeth Pharma, and they are growing very fat and rich indeed.
There is another greedy motivation for holding down the populations of developing nations. There is a lot of money in getting women and men hooked on contraception! The London Family Planning Summit announced as its goal getting 120 million more women on contraception, most of them in Africa.[v] If we take the average cost of contraception as $500 per year per woman, that’s sixty billion dollars ― every year![vi]
Part of the objective is to make the entire continent of Africa just a puppet of the huge international pharmaceutical cartel. This will make sure that Big Pharma continues to get billions of dollars a year from your governments, money which could have been much better spent on authentic economic development.
As Amartya Sen said, “Promoting a “family planning first” strategy can send a message to poor people: `Wish you weren’t here’.”
The primary weapon of colonization is population control, sometimes referred to as “contraceptive imperialism,” and its tools are anything that will reduce the number of children that women are having. These tools include abortion, birth control and sterilization, divorce, sex education, and even the encouragement and acceptance of homosexuality.
In developing countries, the Population Council, the International Planned Parenthood Federation, and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), among many, many others, use effective CIA‑like tactics to infiltrate government ministries and the press and entertainment industry, recruit “focus groups” of local people upon which to test their theories, and undermine indigenous values and traditions.
According to Information Project for Africa (IPFA) researcher Elizabeth Sobo, the objective of such intensive programs “… is to literally saturate the media with birth‑control themes, and at the same time to make it appear that these ideas represent nothing more than a spontaneous change in local customs.”
These programs feature not just localized ads, but massive nationwide and even continent‑wide media and propaganda saturation campaigns.
The fact that some cultures might be completely against homosexuality, divorce and abortion, is entirely irrelevant. The Western model will be imposed by the population controllers, regardless of what the receiving nation’s people think or believe. The media, which is corrupted early in the takeover of any developing nation, will simply refuse to allow any message to be heard that conflicts with that of the conquerors.
And there are other more secret ways to hold down the population of a nation.
The first of these is the DDT ban, allegedly because it is a harmful carcinogen and weakens bird eggs. But both of these charges have been disproven, so why is DDT still not allowed? Why, to hold down the African population, of course! One environmentalist said that “The mosquitos and malaria in question acted as a natural population control. After the introduction of DDT into some areas of Africa, the population increased so much that people began starving. Population control sounds a lot better to me than starvation and the environmental destruction caused by overpopulation.”
Every day, 7,200 more Africans die of malaria (90% of them children). That is one every 12 seconds. This adds up to a total of 115,603,927 Africans who have died of malaria due to the DDT ban as of April 15, 2015.
Another sneaky way of holding down a nation’s population is to encourage the people to kill themselves by leaving out a vital fact. I have seen more than 100 different condom billboards in Africa, and not a single one of them warns that condoms break, tear or slip off one time in 16 uses, according to the “family planner’s handbook,” Contraceptive Technology. So the people believe that they are perfectly safe if they use condoms. But if you have an average of 5 or 6 or 7 total condom failures in a single year, how safe from HIV/AIDS are you really going to be?
If we look at the fifty most populated nations in Africa, we see a curious but very significant trend. The more Catholics and Muslims there are in a nation, the less HIV/AIDS there is. This is because, in Africa at least, Catholics and Muslims closely follow their religion’s prohibition on the use of condoms. So we see, in the nations North of the Sahara, 99 percent Muslim population with almost zero HIV/AIDS. As the percentage of Catholics and Muslims decreases, the percent of adult HIV/AIDS infection rises dramatically. In all of the nations with less than a 20 percent Catholic and Muslim population, the minimum rate of adult infection is 15% (one in six), and it goes all the way up to 29 percent (nearly one in three adults).
When not trying to make Africans kill each other while making love, the United States tries to get them to kill each other by making war, in a third way to control the population.
In 1974, the United States government under President Richard Nixon, published National Security Study Memorandum 201 entitled “Military Assistance and Arms Policy in Black Africa.” This Memo described how the USA can make money off of both sides in African conflicts by selling both sides the weapons that are the most effective at killing.
For a complete exposé, see the film “NSSM: Guns, Greed, Genocide,” by Del Walters.
The most effective strategy the population controllers and other anti-lifers have used all over the world is infiltration and subversion. This means that, over a period of years, they corrupt the decision-makers in the target country with money and propaganda.
The great Chinese general Sun Tzu wrote in his classic book The Art of War that “All warfare is based primarily on the deception of an enemy. Fighting on a battlefield is the most primitive way of making war. There is no art higher than to destroy your enemy without a fight ― by subverting anything of value in your enemy’s country.”
There are ten sources of influence in any society, no matter how developed or underdeveloped it may be. These are divided into the concentrated, or focused, sources of influence, and the diffuse sources of influence.
The eight concentrated sources of influence are organizations or entities where relatively few people influence the morals of an entire nation through mass means of communication. These individuals create and disseminate the ideas, attitudes and symbols that appeal to the rest of the population. The moral direction of every country is determined by an elite cadre consisting of about one tenth of one percent of the population, which leads;
1) The United Nations, with more than a score of huge agencies, including the World Bank, the World Health Organization (WHO), UNESCO, UNICEF, and hundreds of thousands of workers, as well as a worldwide annual budget of tens of billions of dollars;
2) The thousands of official non-governmental organizations (NGOs), many of which are involved in population control;
3) The executive branches of the national governments, regions, states and large population centers;
4) The courts, particularly the national court systems;
5) The legislatures at the national, regional and state levels;
6) The leaders and boards of associations with specific missions, including organized medical and legal professionals, foundations, and public interest groups;
7) The media, particularly the entertainment industry (motion pictures, television, radio), the print and news media (newspapers, magazines, book authors and publishers and newscasters) and the arts; and
8) School leaders, from grade school board presidents to the policymakers at medical and legal colleges.
Then there are the two dispersed sources of influence. These involve millions of people ― primarily parents, clergy and more experienced people ― influencing the morals of many others on a one‑to‑one basis in;
9) The Church; and
10) The family.
In the first step of the revolution, a relatively small group of people gain control of the concentrated organs of influence and then consolidate their position. In order to complete the process of revolution, they must then exert pressure on the dispersed organs of influence ― the family and the Church ― in order to make them “fall into line.”
Revolutions almost never proceed to this second and final stage ― control of the Church and the family ― because of several reasons.
To begin with, the Church and family are led by millions of decision‑makers, not just a few thousand, and are therefore vastly more difficult to reach, influence and control. They can only be contained to a certain degree. This is the idea behind the anti-life emphasis on the separation of Church and state.
Second, the authentic Christian Church is guided not by the transitory and fickle laws of men, but by the eternal law of God, which is unchangeable. The true Christian Church holds a constant course, while false religions tailor their messages in a way that follows the latest findings in science and psychology, and are therefore secular in essence and often even in ritual.
Finally, in a true democracy, it is not the place of the State to substitute for the Church and the family, although it strives mightily to do so in nations with Socialistic systems.
Anti‑life revolutionaries can only hope to succeed by relying upon the process of assimilation, whereby the state does not attack Church and family directly, but bribes them with monetary benefits and tax manipulation into repudiating their own values. If this happens, the State will simply absorb Church and family, and will transform them into powerless, irrelevant entities that it can manipulate at will. Anti‑lifers have completed this process in Europe and Canada, have advanced it tremendously in the United States, and are aggressively launching it in Latin America, Asia and Africa.
Question 3: Who is Doing This to Nigeria?
In order to understand who is trying to destroy the families of Africa, we must first know that the primary motivation behind population control is simple greed.
On December 10, 1974, the United States National Security Council promulgated a top secret document entitled National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM-200), also called The Kissinger Report. It was subtitled “Implications of Worldwide Population Growth For U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.” This document was declassified in 1989. It laid out a detailed strategy by which the United States would aggressively promote population control in developing nations in order to regulate (or have better access to) the natural resources of these countries.
In order to protect U.S. commercial interests, NSSM-200 cited a number of factors that could interrupt the smooth flow of materials from lesser-developed countries, LDCs as it called them, to the United States, including a large population of anti-imperialist youth, who must, according to NSSM-200, be limited by population control. The document identified 13 nations by name that would be primary targets of U.S.-funded population control efforts. The named countries were India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Colombia.
According to NSSM-200, elements of the implementation of population control programs could include: a) the legalization of abortion; b) financial incentives for countries to increase their abortion, sterilization and contraception-use rates; c) indoctrination of children; and d) mandatory population control, and coercion of other forms, such as withholding disaster and food aid unless an LDC implements population control programs.
NSSM-200 also specifically declared that the United States was to cover up its population control activities and avoid possible charges of imperialism by inducing the United Nations and various non-governmental organizations ― especially the International Planned Parenthood Federation, the Pathfunder Fund, and the Population Council ― to do its dirty work.
While the CIA and Departments of State and Defense have issued hundreds of papers on population control and national security, the U.S. government has never renounced NSSM-200, but has only amended certain portions of its policy. NSSM-200, therefore, remains the foundational document on population control issued by the United States government.
The full text of NSSM-200 and a detailed commentary by Human Life International are both contained on The Facts of Life DVD.
The reason NSSM-200 was written in the first place is explained in the document itself: “The U.S. economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries. That fact gives the U.S. enhanced interest in the political, economic, and social stability of the supplying countries. Wherever a lessening of population pressures through reduced birth rates can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resource supplies and to the economic interests of the United States.”
NSSM-200 does not mention national welfare or the raising of the standards of living of the people of a nation; its only motivation is to allow the United States to get its hands on the natural resources of developing countries.
NSSM-200, Section 30(a), says: “Concentration on Key Countries. … Assistance for population moderation should give primary emphasis to the largest and fastest growing developing countries where there is special U.S. political and strategic interest. Those countries are: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Columbia. Together, they account for 47 percent of the world’s current population increase.”
NSSM-200 also says that “No country has reduced its population growth without resorting to abortion.”
Malcolm Potts, a former Medical Secretary of the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), knows more about abortion and population control than anyone else alive. He confirmed this view when he said that “No developed country has brought down its birth rate without a considerable recourse to abortion, and it appears unlikely that developing countries can ever hope to see any decline in their fertility without a massive resort to induced abortion ― legal or illegal.”[xii]
This is certainly true ― All 47 so-called “developed” nations have legalized abortion or have easily accessible abortion, and only two of them are replacing their populations.
Since abortion is still repugnant to the peoples of Latin America, the Caribbean, Africa and parts of Asia and Oceania, we must mask our desire to legalize abortion by pretending to care about the state of women’s health. We do this by saying that we want to eliminate “unsafe abortion.”
The selfish and greedy motivation for population control was freely admitted by governmental officials for years, before it became politically incorrect and counterproductive to the overall strategy to do so.
For example, R.T. Ravenholt, Director of the United States Government’s Office of Population, said at a 1977 meeting of the Population Association of America that “Population control is needed to maintain the normal operation of U.S. commercial interests around the world. … Without our trying to help these countries with their economic and social development, the world would rebel against the strong U.S. commercial presence. The self-interest thing is a compelling element.”[xiii]
Since 1991, the “developed” nations of the world have spent $4.91 billion in Nigeria trying to keep down the population of the people. In 1991, the population controllers spent about $31 million in Nigeria, but this has increased by a factor of more than 30 to more than half a billion dollars a year. This is because Nigeria is becoming too strong and must be kept weak by suppressing its population.[xiv]
Dr. Alan Guttmacher, who did more than anyone else in the history of the world to spread abortion and population control everywhere, said that “If you’re going to curb population, it’s extremely important not to have it done by the dammed Yankees, but by the UN. Because the thing is, then it’s not considered genocide. If the United States goes to the Black man or the yellow man and says slow down your reproduction rate, we’re immediately suspected of having ulterior motives to keep the white man dominant in the world. If you can send in a colorful UN force, you’ve got much better leverage.”[xv]
As Dr. Guttmacher recognized, the “developed” nations can’t just give tens of billions of dollars directly to developing nations and order them to have fewer children. NSSM-200 recognized that this would be perceived as racist and imperialist.
So we go through the middlemen, the giant population control groups, and have them do our dirty work for us. They pay lavish salaries and benefits to some of the target nation’s citizens to give the false impression that they are the ones who are embracing population control for their own country’s good.
There are more than one hundred major population control groups in the world, including those that have successfully convinced us that their good work in other areas should excuse their evil activities. Many of these groups have obscure names that do not hint at their activities. A few of these huge groups, whose primary purpose is population control, and their incomes over the past ten years, include;
• Direct Relief International (DRI) [$2.3 billion];
• DKT International [$1 billion];
• Family Health International (FHI) [$3.2 billion];
• John Snow Research & Training Institute [$1.3 billion];
• Marie Stopes International (MSI) [$1.1 billion];
• PATH (Program for Appropriate Technology in Health) [$3.2 billion];
• Pathfinder International [$1.1 billion];
• Population Council (PC) [$2.1 billion];
• Population Services International (PSI) [$3.3 billion]
• Research Triangle Institute (RTI) [$7.1 billion]
• And, the largest population control group of them all, the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) [$43.3 billion].
This list is only for North American population control groups, and does not even count European popcon groups or big NGOs like the International Red Cross or Doctors without Borders, which do a lot of population control work in addition to their other activities.
Aid from the West is poisoned, and will do much more damage than good. It always has strings attached. For example, Bishop Emmanuel Badejo of Oyo revealed that “The United States actually said it would help Nigeria with Boko Haram only if we modify our laws concerning homosexuality, family planning, and birth control.”[xvi]
Population controllers tend to look at population densities to determine (in their minds) if a nation is “overpopulated.” But if they compare African nations to European nations, their ingrained racism becomes evident.
Sub-Saharan Africa has only about 39 people per square kilometer, and the population controllers tell us that this is terrible overpopulation. But Europe has five times as many people per square kilometer (174), and this is perfectly fine, in their expert opinion.
The same holds true of individual nations. The population controllers see Nigeria, with 197 people per square kilometer, and shout “overpopulation!” But in England, the most crowded nation in Europe, where many large population control groups are located (including the International Planned Parenthood Federation and Marie Stopes International), there is a population density more than twice as large — 400 people per square kilometer — and this does not seem to be a problem with them.
Nigerian Bishop Hyacinth Egbobo is not afraid to point out the problem: “Also, please keep in mind that we have more pressing problems here than what is bothering the West, and which you tend to dump on us ― like same-sex marriage or abortion. We have been told that in order to access Western aid, we have to accept the modern way of doing things. We don’t want any of that. But we are dying of lack of food, for lack of very basic things.
“Don’t try to impose your way of life on Africa. The West is far too interested in what it can get out of Africa ― like our oil or diamonds in the Democratic Republic of Congo ― while only giving us some paltry gifts or selling us weapons we don’t need. Instead please, help us to stand on our feet and become mature enough so that we could positively contribute to life and the world in general. Africa is a gift to humanity. But Africa needs to stand up ― we are dying.”[xix]
So ― What is the hidden reason that all of this happening?
Meet the man who instituted population control and who ordered the writing of NSSM-200: President Richard Milhous Nixon.
On March 30, 1972, he said “I think a majority of people in Michigan are for abortion, I think in both cases, well, certainly in Michigan, they will vote for it because they think what’s going to be aborted generally are the little Black bastards.”
A few days later, on April 3, 1972, he said “As I told you ― we talked about it earlier ― that a hell of a lot of people want to control the negro bastards. You know what we are talking about ― population control.”[xxi]
What were the population controllers afraid of in the 1920s, and what are they afraid of now?
Harvard professor Lothrop Stoddard outlined the primary fear of population controllers in his 1921 book The Rising Tide of Color against White World-Supremacy. He was worried about “differential fertility,” or the fact that Blacks were outbreeding Whites worldwide.
He wrote that “None of the colored races shows perceptible signs of declining birth‑rate, all tending to breed up to the limits of available subsistence … It can mean only one thing: A tremendous and steadily augmenting outward thrust of surplus colored men from overcrowded colored homelands … Crossings with the negro are uniformly fatal. Whites, Amerindians, or Asiatics ― all are alike vanquished by the invincible prepotency of the more primitive, generalized, and lower negro blood. … In ethnic crossings, the negro strikingly displays his prepotency, for black blood, once entering a human stock, seems never really bred out again.”[xxii]
Note that Stoddard considered Black people to be less than human.
Why do I quote this hard-core racist and eugencist?
Because he sat on the board of Margaret Sanger’s American Birth Control League for ten years after writing this book, and was one of her closest advisors. Of course, the American Birth Control League is now known as the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.
Stoddard’s book The Rising Tide of Color against White World‑Supremacy showed typical racist stereotypes on its cover ― the spear-carrying African and knife- and sword-wielding Asians menacing White North America.
The cover of his book The Revolt against Civilization: The Menace of the Under-Man was even cruder; Black people are depicted as ugly and vicious monkeys throwing Molotov cocktails, and there is even a stereotypical bald, angry-looking hook-nosed Jew in the crowd.
What the population controllers have always feared is coming to pass: The “demographic cross” has already occurred.
In 1950, Europe had 22 percent of the world’s population, while Africa possessed only nine percent. Europe’s population was still growing at that time, but Africa’s was growing much faster. In 1950, Europe’s population growth rate was slowing down, while Africa’s remained constant.
In 1997, two things happened simultaneously: Europe’s population stopped growing and levelled out, and Africa’s population passed Europe’s like a rocket passing a broken-down horse. In 1997, for the first time in the history of the world, Africa’s population exceeded that of Europe.
The greatest fear of the racist population controllers had finally become a reality. Currently, Europe’s population is actually declining by two and a half million people a year, while Africa’s is increasing by 17 million per year.
By the middle of this century, the continents will have completed the process of switching places. Africa will have 21 percent of the world’s population, while Europe possesses only eight percent. Even more interestingly, the average European will be 58 years old in the year 2050, and the average African will be only 29.
So who does the future belong to ― a continent with an old, small population with few natural resources, or a continent with a large, young population with vast natural resources? If Africa can overcome its corruption and civil wars, it will lead the world in just a couple of decades.
On a worldwide level, another “demographic cross” occurred just five year ago, in 2010. In 1950, more than one-quarter of the world’s population was White. It is currently only 15 percent, and is set to decrease to less than ten percent by the year 2060. If this trend continues, the last White person will die in about the year 2200.
Meanwhile, the worldwide Black population is increasing rapidly, from only nine percent in 1950 to 25 percent now.
Further evidence of the ingrained racism of the population controllers is provided by an examination of where population control dollars are spent. These numbers are current (2015) dollars spent per person during the time period of 1991 to 2015.
No population control dollars were spent in North America or in Northern or Western Europe. They aren’t needed, as these nations have abortion on demand and their populations are either declining or stable.
The average Latin American has been the target of about seven dollars of population control expenditures over the past twenty years. About the same amount has been spent on people in the Middle East. About four and a half dollars per person has been spent in Asia, which has sixty percent of the world’s population. About sixty dollars per person has been spent in Oceania, primarily targeting indigenous peoples.
But Africans have been targeted with $52 per person, and each person in the Caribbean has had nearly $60 of population control money spent on them.[xxiii]
It is obvious that Africa and the Caribbean, which are largely Black, are the primary targets of the population controllers today. After all, Africa is largely empty and most of the world’s population is crowded into Asia, so why is twelve times as much money spent on Africans as on Asians?
This is simple racism translated into policy and action.
The Facts of Life DVD contains 500 detailed dossiers on groups cooperating with the Culture of Death, including where the groups work, their activities, their publications, quotes by their leaders, and their finances.
Some of the major population control groups that are active in Nigeria today include;
• Advocates for Youth
• Family Health International (FHI)
• Guttmacher Institute
• International Consortium for Medical Abortion (ICMA)
• International Women’s Health Coalition (IWHC)
• Marie Stopes International
• Population Reference Bureau (PRB)
