Home Blog Page 467

When The Character Is Not Federal

By Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, SAN

Under and by virtue of section 2 (1) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended), ‘Nigeria shall be one indivisible and indissoluble Sovereign State to be known by the name of the Federal Republic of Nigeria’. By section 2 (2) thereof, ‘Nigeria shall be a Federation consisting of States and a Federal Capital Territory’. The concept of a Federation is the coming together of several units to form a common government to actualize certain common purposes. The diversities are harnessed in such a way as to achieve equity, fairness and unity. In a Federation, certain limited resources are pulled together with a defined arrangement which outlines ownership and control thereof. Nigeria’s claim to a federal system of government has been roundly defeated by the antics of successive military regimes, most oftentime executing an agenda that seems always to tilt in favour of some segments of the Federation. Under the military regimes, there is centralization, resulting from its normal chain of command. Properly speaking therefore, one may not be totally wrong to say that the Federal Republic of Nigeria commenced its operation on May 29, 1999, when the military yielded power to its civilian counterpart.

Arising from the report of Sir Henry Willink Commission, it became necessary to address the fears of the minorities by inserting certain provisions in the Constitution in order to achieve national integration and cohesion. There was a need for some kind of protection from the dominance of the majority ethnic groups who were always sure of victory at any given election because of their numbers. Accordingly, section 14 (3) provides that ‘the composition of the Government of the Federation or any of its agencies and the conduct of its affairs shall be carried out in such a manner as to reflect the federal character of Nigeria and the need to promote national unity, and also to command national loyalty, thereby ensuring that there shall be no predominance of persons from a few States or from a few ethnic or other sectional groups in that Government or in any of its agencies.’ This is simple enough, for any one who truly desires to practice equity and justice in running the Federation. The Constitution has imposed a prohibition against tribalism, ethnicity, bigotry and clannishness of any form whatsoever, but our leaders have not ceased to deploy these as weapons of division, selfishly to their own political advantage. So the questions to answer in this regard are legion: why should only one ethnic group rule over the Federal Capital Territory? Why should one section of Nigeria dominate the security agencies and institutions? How come the major revenue agencies and parastatals are under the firm grip of one particual ethnic group; Nigeria Customs Service, Nigerian Ports Authority, Federal Inland Revenue Service, Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited, Etc. In section 15 (2) of the Constitution, it is stated clearly that ‘natioal integration shall be actively encouraged, whilst discrimination on the grounds of place of origin, sex, religion, status, ethnic or linguistic association or ties shall be prohibited’. How else do we desire to outlaw tribalism and nepotism, when the Constitution itself has expressly prohibited it?

The Federal Character Commission was established by law in December, 1995, with responsibility to promote, monitor and enforce compliance with the principles of the proportional sharing of all bureaucratic, economic, media and political posts at all levels of government.

The Functions of the Commission are listed in section 4 of the Federal Character Commission (Establishment, Etc) Act as follows:

(1) The functions of the Commission shall be‐

(a) to work out an equitable formula, subject to the approval of the President, for the distribution of all cadres of posts in the civil and the public services of the Federation and of the States, the armed forces, the Nigeria Police Force and other security agencies, bodies corporate owned by the Federal or a State Government and Extra‐ Ministerial Departments and parastatals of the Federation and States;

(b) to promote, monitor and enforce compliance with the principles of proportional sharing of all bureaucratic, economic, media and political posts at all levels of government;

(c) to take such legal measures including the prosecution of the heads or staff of any Ministry, Extra‐ Ministerial Department or agency which fails to comply with any federal character principle or formula prescribed or adopted by the Commission;

(d) to work out‐ (i) an equitable formula, subject to the approval of the President, for distribution of socio‐economic services, amenities and infrastructural facilities; (ii) modalities and schemes, subject to the approval of the President, for redressing the problems of imbalances and reducing the fear of relative deprivation and marginalisation in the Nigerian system of federalism as it obtains in the public and private sectors;

(e) to intervene in the operation of any agency of the Federal Government, subject to the approval of the President, where in the opinion of the Commission the function of the agency concerned is relevant to the functions of the Commission and the Commission is of the opinion that it is not being effectively implemented;

(f) to advise the Federal, State, and local governments to intervene and influence providers of services, goods and socio‐economic amenities to extend such services, goods and socio‐economic amenities to deprived areas of the country;

(g) to ensure that all Ministries and Extra‐Ministerial Departments, agencies and other bodies affected by this Act have a clear criteria indicating conditions to be fulfilled and comprehensive guidelines on the procedure for‐ (i) determining eligibility and the procedure for employment in the public and private sectors of the economy; (ii) the provision of social services, goods and socio‐economic amenities in Nigeria;

(h) to ensure that public officers shall, in the performance of their functions, adhere strictly to rules and regulations made pursuant to this Act;

(i) to advise the Federal Government of Nigeria on the structure and rationalisation of any Ministry, Extra‐ Ministerial Department or agency; and

(j) to carry out such other functions as the President shall, from time to time, assign to it. (2) For the avoidance of doubt‐ (a) the posts mentioned in paragraphs (a) and (b) of subsection (1) of this section shall include those of the Permanent Secretary in the Civil Service of the Federation or the State Civil Service, Directors‐General in Extra‐ Ministerial Departments and Parastatals, Directors in Ministries and Extra‐Ministerial Departments, Senior Military Officers, Senior Diplomatic Posts, Managerial Cadres in the Federal and State Parastatals, bodies corporate, Agencies and Institutions; and (b) socio‐economic services, amenities and facilities mentioned in paragraph (d) of subsection (1) of this section include those in the sectors of education, electricity, health, commerce and industry, telecommunications, transport and youth development.

(3) Any person who fails to comply with the guidelines issued under paragraph (h) of subsection (1) of this section is guilty of an offence under this Act and liable to penalties specified in section 15 (1) of this Act.

(4) Notwithstanding any provision in any other law or enactment, the Commission shall ensure that every public company or corporation reflects the federal character in the appointments of its directors and senior management staff.

When section 4 above is combined with section 14(3) of the Constitution, the irresistible conclusion would be that Nigeria can never be plagued with issues of tribalism and nepotism, but that is exactly the situation with our dear country, today. If you take a roll call of most federal agencies, institutions and parastatals, there is a dominance of a particular ethnic group to which President Muhammadu Buhari belongs. When you walk into any office of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commision for instance, your immediate realization is that of an environment dominated by the Hausa/Fulani workmen. It is also possible that this is the case with other tribes or ethnic groups in other establishments but the Buhari government has been very notorious in populating people of his ethnic group in very strategic positions of authority.

Recently, the main revenue agency of the government was said to have been privatized following the passage of the Petroleum Industry Bill. Let us take a look into the management staff of the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited. I got a post that circulated over the social media last week and it is very scary indeed. I waited for it to be denied but that has not happened so far so it may be safe to consider the contents as true.

“A review of the top 20 executive positions in NNPC Ltd reads like a Northern Nigeria Petroleum Company.

1. Mele Kyari (GMD), 2. Umar Ajiya (Chief Finance Officer/Finance and Accounts), 3. Yusuf Usman (Chief Operating Officer), 4. Farouk Garba Sa’id (Chief Operating Officer, Corporate Services), 5. Mustapha Yakubu (Chief Operating Officer, Refining and Petrochemicals), 6. Hadiza Coomassie (Corporate Secretary/Legal Adviser to the Corporation), 7. Omar Ibrahim (Group General Manager, International Energy Relations), 8. Kallamu Abdullahi (GGM Renewable Energy), 9. Ibrahim Birma (GGM Governance Risk and Compliance), 10. Bala Wunti (GGM NAPIMS), 11. Inuwa Waya (MD NNPC Shipping), 12. Musa Lawan (MD Pipelines and Product Marketing), 13. Mansur Sambo (MD Nigeria Petroleum Development Company), 14. Lawal Sade (MD Duke Oil/NNPC Trading Company), 15. Malami Shehu (MD Port Harcourt Refining Company), 16. Muhammed Abah (MD Warri Refining and Petrochemical Company), 17. Abdulkadir Ahmed (MD Nigeria Gas Marketing Company), 18. Salihu Jamari (MD Nigeria Gas and Power Investment Company Limited), 19. Mohammed Zango (MD NNPC Medical Services), 20. Sarki Auwalu (Director, Department of Petroleum Resources).

Only three top positions were allotted to the entire Southern Nigeria. What happened to the federal character? What’s the job of the Federal Character Commission? Do we have a National Assembly? What is wrong with the members of the National Assembly? Where’s the Senate oversight committee on NNPC? Where are the activists?”

This anomaly is not limited to NNPC Ltd of course. Most other revenue agencies of government are similarly filled with the President’s people. Nigerian Ports Authority, Nigerian Customs Service, Federal Inland Revenue Service, the Ministry of Finance and practically all finance-related entities are manned and controlled by the same forces. This cannot encourage unity in any way at all. As things stand presently, there is nothing federal about the character of Nigeria and unless something is done urgently to address this lopsidedness, the burble may just burst. Let the National Assembly Committees supervising the Federal Character Commission sit up to perform its oversight functions, to audit all agencies and parastatals of government to ensure compliance with all relevant laws. The character of the President has been anything but federal.

Life without Christ is Crisis

Legality of CAC’s directive to private schools in Nigeria

On the 14th of March 2022, the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) directed its Name Approving Officers to insist that all private schools, academies and other institutions of learning which seek to register their business names be henceforth directed to register as companies.

It justified the directive on the basis that an academic institution is essentially a body corporate with perpetual succession, capable of contracting and (subject to such restrictions as may be imposed by other laws) capable of issuing certificates in its name- attributes which are absent in a business name. This article argues that the directive is ultra vires.

First, every Nigerian citizen who engages in business or trade has the inherent right to determine the form under which to order his business.

In doing this, he would be guided by law, business exigencies, cost, tax, and regulatory considerations. But registration and formalisation are not mandatory unless required by law. Business registration and formalisation have their benefits, but they also carry the load of regulation and the loss of confidentiality. A person may be mandated to carry out his business through a particular form in some limited instances.

For example, the business of petroleum, insurance, and banking, can only be carried out through the company form (see s.70 of the Petroleum Industry Act 2021, s. 3 of the Insurance Act 2003, s.2 of the Banks and Other Financial Institutions Act 1991, for example).

Secondly, a business with more than 20 members must generally be carried out through the company form (s.19 CAMA). But apart from these few instances, it is left for proprietors to determine how to order their businesses, and CAC is bound to register the form they desire. It is not its duty to determine the suitability of a particular form, and it can only refuse registration where there is manifest illegality in its objects: or where there is non-compliance with a clear statute (s.41(1)CAMA).

Furthermore, it may only insist that a proposed entity adopt a particular object if the object itself has a bearing on the entity.

For example, the objects of a company limited by guarantee or the incorporated trustees of an association must comply with ss. 26(1) and 823(1) CAMA. But (at the risk of repetition), in exercising its regulatory mandate, CAC cannot insist that a business be carried out through a particular form.

There have been instances where names submitted for approval for registration as Limited Partnerships have been queried and rejected by CAC, with the directive that the business be carried out as a Limited Liability Partnership and vice versa. That itself is questionable.

The issue is that CAC is now stretching its powers to insist that all private schools should be registered as companies. But it does not have the right to do this.

CAC was established by s.1 of CAMA, and it is mandated to administer CAMA, register companies and allied forms such as Limited Partnerships, Limited Liability Partnerships, Incorporated Trustees, etc., and regulate them (s.8). It is also authorized to approve and reserve names submitted by proprietors (s.852), and register to business names (s.814 CAMA).

Once reserved and registered, a business name cannot be used by another entity without the owner’s consent. In doing so, CAC is guided by s.852, which authorizes it to refuse to register a name that is identical to that of another company or allied form, or one that resembles it to an extent that is capable of deceit.

CAMA also generally prohibits the use of the words ‘Chamber of Commerce as well as names that are misleading regarding the nature or extent of the entity’s activities.

Names that are undesirable, offensive or contrary to public policy or that violate existing trademarks or registered business names are also prohibited, as well as names that may mislead the public as to the nationality, race or religion of the persons by whom the business is wholly or mainly owned or controlled.

A name that is deceptive or objectionable because it refers to or suggests an association with any practice, institution, personage, foreign state or government, international organization or international brand, or one that is otherwise unsuitable is also prohibited.

Lastly, it prohibits a name that can undermine public peace and national security. The consent of CAC must be obtained before a name containing “Federal”, “National”, “Regional”, “State”, “Government”, or any other word that, in the opinion of CAC, suggests or is calculated to suggest that it enjoys the patronage of the Government of the Federation or the Government of a State etc., in Nigeria can be registered. Also restricted are names that suggest or are calculated to suggest some connection with any municipality or other local authority. Some of these names include ‘Municipal’ or “chartered’. Other restricted words include ‘co-operative’, ‘building society’, ‘group’ or ‘holding’.

But while it may approve and register business names (ss. 31, 814 CAMA), CAC is not authorized to insist that a business be carried out through a particular form. A proprietor may thus carry out his business as a company, an LLP, or even as an LP. Whether or not to register a name is not necessarily linked to its objects, unless the name violates s.852. Any name may thus be registered and used to carry out any legitimate business.

In doing so, it is equally essential for CAC to differentiate business forms from business names. LLPs, LPs, Companies, incorporated trustees etc., are forms of associations. But business names are not. A person, partnership or company may choose to register a business name.

A registered business name is an alias-not a form. It is not a legal personality or entity. In its wisdom, CAMA provides that any business whose name is not the same as those of its proprietor(s) should be registered with CAC (s.814).

Thus if Mr. XXX’s school is named ‘Excellent Foundation Nursery and Primary Academy’, he would be required to register the name in order to create a link between the business and himself.

Mandatory name registration is aimed at protecting the public from fraud and wrongdoing and ensuring the proper identification of persons behind it. But name registration is not a pre-requisite to the business.

That much can be gleaned from the fact that the business can be carried on for 28 days before it is registered (s.815). A proprietor may thus choose to carry out the business of farming, transportation, catering, trading etc., in his name. But where he does so via an alias, he must register the name and submit his personal details and address to CAC (ss.814, 815.)

In other words, what the proprietor registers is not the business but its name. It is not for CAC to refuse to register the name and to insist that the business be registered as a company.

It is admitted that the company form is traditionally suited for businesses with perpetual succession and fluctuating members. It is ideal for an entity, which desires to raise funds by issuing securities.

The company’s attractiveness is further bolstered by limited liability protection, which shields its members from its obligations. It is equally conceded that the company form is better suited for schools and businesses that desire to establish branches all over the country.

It is also a fact that some private schools have branches sprawled across the length and breadth of Nigeria, and it may therefore be tidy if they operate as companies. But they should not, and cannot be forced to do so. A business’s size, turnover or nature, does not determine its form. A proprietor whose firm has a turnover of 1 billion naira and 1000 employees may choose to operate as a company, or as an unincorporated sole proprietorship.

The choice of whether to operate, as a company cannot be done carelessly or hurriedly. It should be weighed carefully. This is because, by its unique nature and the protections it confers, the company form is saddled with extensive regulatory obligations that are designed to protect creditors, shareholders, employees and other relevant stakeholders.

Thus, while a person who seeks to order his business, as a company will enjoy several protections, he would also be subjected to regulatory control and would significantly forfeit his confidentiality. And a proprietor who is not ready for all of these is within his rights to settle for an allied form that would be less demanding from a regulatory perspective.

The writer is not unmindful that the CAC directive may be borne out of the desire to shore up revenues for the Federal Government from taxation, filing, and registration fees. But Nigeria’s federating states also have concurrent powers to regulate businesses and to create frameworks for registering partnerships and unincorporated sole proprietorship. And schools have traditionally been within the ambit of the states.

In the spirit of fiscal federalism, it is recommended that the FGN should not infringe on sectors that have been known to shore up revenues for the states. For the most part, state governments regulate private schools, irrespective of the form they assume. And the reality is that states are better placed to monitor and regulate them.

And if schools are to be mandated to register as companies there must be a statutory provision to that effect. It should not be at the whim of CAC. And many schools may opt to operate as unincorporated entities in order to avoid being subjected to CAMA’s extensive provisions.

The decline of the Nigerian educational system and the breakdown of the public school system are being addressed by the rise of private schools at (tertiary, primary, and tertiary levels), most of which provide efficient and effective education while observing international best practices. Although they tend to be expensive, they create jobs for thousands and generate revenues for state governments. All the tiers of government should encourage them.

At a time when it has become imperative that small businesses be encouraged and strengthened in Nigeria, private schools should not be subjected to unnecessary regulatory burdens. It is worth remembering that private schools come in various sizes. Some are located in rural areas where government services are broken down.

Some have as few as 20 students, while others are large conglomerates with multi-campus complexes, which operate across the vertical chain of the educational sector. Some schools generate less than N100 000.00 annually in profits, while others rake in as much as N100, 000,000.

Irrespective of size, private schools are expected to pay taxes, levies, and fees to the states’ governments where they operate. But if they were mandated to be registered as companies, they would also have to pay CIT. This will discourage small private schools and may disrupt the services they provide for poorer Nigerians. A fact that would not only be unlawful as it stands but would also negate the spirit of true federalism.

Subai is a Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Law, Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Bayelsa State.

Message from
“Cry The Beloved Country”

Inside Stuff With MARTINS OLOJA

“There is not much talking now. A silence falls upon them all. This is no time to talk of hedges and fields, or the beauties of any country. Sadness and fear and hate, how they well up in the heart and mind, whenever one opens pages of these messengers of doom. Cry for the broken tribe, for the law and the custom that is gone. Aye, and cry aloud for the man who is dead, for the woman and children bereaved. Cry, the beloved country, these things are not yet at an end. The sun pours down on the earth, on the lovely land that man cannot enjoy. He knows only the fear of his heart.”
Alan Paton, “Cry, The Beloved Country”

“We do not know, we do not know. We shall live from day to day, and put more locks on the doors, and get a fine fierce dog when the fine fierce bitch next door has pups, and hold on to our handbags more tenaciously; and the beauty of the trees by night, and the raptures of lovers under the stars, these things we shall forego. We shall forego the coming home drunken through the midnight streets, and the evening walk over the star-lit veld. We shall be careful, and knock this off our lives, and knock that off our lives, and hedge ourselves about with safety and precaution. And our lives will shrink, but they shall be the lives of superior beings; and we shall live with fear, but at least it will not be a fear of the unknown. And the conscience shall be thrust down; the light of life shall not be extinguished, but be put under a bushel, to be preserved for a generation that will live by it again, in some day not yet come; and how it will come, and when it will come, we shall not think about at all.”
― Alan Paton, “Cry, The Beloved Country”

“Who indeed knows the secret of the earthly pilgrimage? Who indeed knows why there can be comfort in a world of desolation? Now God be thanked that there is a beloved one who can lift up the heart in suffering, that one can play with a child in the face of such misery. Now God be thanked that the name of a hill is such music, that the name of a river can heal. Aye, even the name of a river that runs no more.
Who indeed knows the secret of the earthly pilgrimage? Who knows for what we live, and struggle and die? Who knows what keeps us living and struggling, while all things break about us? Who knows why the warm flesh of a child is such comfort, when one’s own child is lost and cannot be recovered? Wise men write many books, in words too hard to understand. But this, the purpose of our lives, the end of all our struggle, is beyond all human wisdom.”
― Alan Paton, “Cry The Beloved Country”

“I see only one hope for our country, and that is when white men and black men, desiring neither power nor money, but desiring only the good for their country, come together to work for it.
I have one great fear in my heart, that one day when they are turned to loving, they will find we are turned to hating.”

― Alan Paton, “Cry, The Beloved Country”

I was reflecting on what to write this week when a ‘small still voice’ nudged me to write another message of hope to our people who have been confounded by the incompetence and cluelessness of most of the leaders we elected to manage ‘security and welfare of the people as primary purpose of government’. Yes, they have all failed us and so it is already too late to raise any redemption songs. Their rampaging incompetence has overwhelmed them. And so we need to focus on how to encourage our people to conquer one weapon of mass discontent – fear of the unknown. Yes, fear. We need to say to our people: ‘be not afraid’ at this time. A time to say to our people: do not run away because of Buhari-nomics that has gone awry. Separate the man from the country at this moment and recall that ancient word, which tells us that, ‘Whoever watches the wind will not plant…’

I mean my spirit man tells me to encourage our people with inspirational stories from a 1946 classic by a South African, Alan Paton, “Cry, The Beloved Country”.

It isn’t a book of lamentation, which isn’t a strategy to conquer evil, anyway. I would like to deconstruct the book as you have seen some inspirational words on marble above from the literary work that can speak to our situation at this time. Even the excerpts above are worth reading repeatedly if you can find the time. Why do I say so?

Fear is a prevalent theme in ‘Cry, the Beloved Country’. The fact that ‘fear’ appears in the same passage as the novel’s title phrase testifies to its importance: ‘Cry, the beloved country, for the unborn child that is the inheritor of our fear. Let him not love the earth too deeply…’

It tells the story of a father’s journey from rural South Africa to and through the city of Johannesburg in search of his son. The reader cannot help but feel deeply for the central character, a Zulu pastor, Stephen Kumalo, and the tortuous discoveries he makes in Johannesburg. Just as remarkable discoveries we make now in Lagos and Abuja.

The author, Paton depicts that social problems plague every generation and even though the circumstances change, society continues to suffer from the same problem that plagued us thousands of years ago.

Paton explains that these problems lie rooted in the nature of individuals, and to achieve lasting change one must change how people approach and react to these problems. In that Paton’s 1946 social criticism, “Cry, The Beloved Country”, he uses imagery to emphasise the social problems of broken families and tribe, consequences of poverty, and the repercussions of racism just as we can see clearly in our society today.

In the opinion of the author then in South Africa, the destruction of earth and the family in the enclave is a major problem for the advancement of society. Paton repeatedly describes the intricate relationship between the tribe, earth and man. Paton describes the conditions of Shanty town as “narrow” and “forgotten”. The use of these qualifiers to help build the picture of poverty faced by the black people of South Africa is remarkable.

Poverty is difficult to describe and understand if you have not seen it first hand. Paton describes the “tragic” and “sad” situation in a way we can understand because, he understands poverty is a problem faced by every generation and we can only fix poverty by stopping it at the source. That source of these problems is a broken family and a society with no morals. Arthur Jarvis, a white character in the work communicates Paton’s feelings toward the family with his papers “It is not permissible for us to go on destroying family life when we know that we are destroying it”. Paton tells us that we know in our hearts what causes poverty, but we are often ignorant and reluctant to change it. We must change ourselves to have a chance at changing the society we live…This is important to those who would like to succeed today’s leaders tomorrow ‘if tomorrow comes’.

According to various reviews, one way Paton connects the reader to the racial tension in the novel is through the repetition of the thematic title throughout key events in the novel. He often uses the wording of the title within the text to express the pain inflicted by South Africa’s moral conflict, racial segregation and oppression. Paton uses the repetition to connect events in the story with the overall theme, altering the context slightly each time.At one point, Paton expresses the anguish of the broken African society and the transformation and assimilation into a white man’s society of hatred and separation. He pleads, “Cry for the broken tribe, for the law and the custom that is gone. Aye, and cry aloud for the man who is dead, for the woman and children bereaved. Cry, the beloved country, these things are not yet at an end”.

The Paton’s creative work has been hailed as one of the greatest South African novels. ‘Cry, the Beloved Country’ was first published in the United States, bringing international attention to South Africa’s tragic history. The novel, which captures the extremes of human emotion and Alan Paton’s faith in human dignity in the worst of circumstances, is poignant and uplifting. The novel shows the brutality of apartheid but despite its unflinching portrayal of darkness and despair in South Africa, it still offers hope for a better future.

The novel itself is a cry for South Africa, which we learn is beloved in spite of everything; a cry for its people, its land, and the tentative hope for its freedom from hatred, poverty and fear. And so the great Madiba (Nelson Mandela) manifested to represent a glimmer of hope that has made South Africa as Africa’s most significant nation at this moment.

I also see hope of a great Nigeria from this present debris and darkness. Where is my optimism?
In a country torn by segregation and hatred, one man seeks to rebuild his family and his tribe. ‘Cry, the beloved country’ is a tale of forgiveness, generosity, and endurance. In the story, the main protagonist is helped by a number of characters. A South African man Stephen Kumalo loses his young son, but is still determined to improve the life of his people. In this black man’s country, white man’s law had broken the tribe, divided the people and corrupted the youth. How could these wounds of hatred be healed, when would the youth realise the immorality of their actions, and when would South Africans achieve unity. Father Vincent said, “Fear is a journey, a terrible journey, but sorrow is at least an arriving…”

That is why I said we must banish fear of even election riggers at this time and work hard to elect leaders instead of dealers.

One must be thankful for what one already possesses and work hard to improve. In the classic, Kumalo gets Absalom and the girl married and took the girl home. It also helps him realize Absalom’s condition when he committed the crime. Msimangu said, “I see only one hope for this country and that is when white and black men, desiring neither power nor money, but desiring only the good of their country come together to work for it.”
I also see only one hope for Nigeria and that is when Christians and Muslims desiring neither power nor money but desiring the good of their country, come together and work for it.

South Africa was also plagued with problems of poverty, apartheid, and crime. Kumalo realises that to find some solution people must forgive each other for what has already happened and make a joint effort to provide a new life to the country. Mourning about the past helps nobody: It’s a better future that peoples should strive for. That is another message of hope from Paton’s ‘Cry The Beloved Country’ for all of us who should work and pray for a better and more united country after President Buhari’s eight years of mesmerising us into acting ‘Waiting for Godot’.

Photo news: Tears, grief, as Court of Appeal President buries son

It was grief, anguish, and tears as Prince Paeke Shapnaan Dongban, son of the President, Court of Appeal Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem was committed to earth at the weekend.

His mother, Hon. Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem was a picture of grief.

The Plateau State Governor Simon Bako Lalong, Governors of Niger, Kebbi, Jigawa as well as the Representative of the Acting Chief Justice of Nigeria were, among numerous sympathisers that attended the funeral.

President Muhammadu Buhari in a condolence message issued by his media aide, Garba Shehu described the death of the 38-year-old mathematician as tragic.

“I am deeply saddened to learn about the sudden demise of your worthy son Paeke. With his passing away, a promising public career has been tragically cut short. In this hour of grief, our thoughts and prayers are with you, your family, and the entire people of Plateau State…” Also, the Northern Governors Forum in a statement described the death of Shapnaan as very sad.

The funeral service which took place at the St. Peters Claver Catholic Church Demshin, Shendam LGA Plateau State was very sombre as friends, associates, and family of the deceased paid their last respects to the late Paeke Shapnaan who was described as a kind, jovial, loving and helpful personality.

Speaking at the funeral service, Governor Simon Lalong said the death of Prince Shapnaan was a painful experience for not only the immediate family but the entire state as he was one of the young professionals that the State groomed for national service.

In a statement by his spokesman, Dr. Makut Simon Macham, Lalong, commiserated with the parents of the deceased HRH Miskoom David Isa Dongban, the Long Dorok of Dorok Chiefdom, and Hon. Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem whom he said have had to bear another tragic death of a son having experienced a similar loss some years ago.

He urged them to accept the demise of their son as the will of God and take comfort in the time they shared together as well as his contributions to the family, Plateau State, and Nigeria during his years on earth.

Kebbi State Governor Atiku Bagudu who represented the Nigerian Governors Forum said the Forum was saddened by the death of the young Prince and commiserates with them in the moment of grief and pain.

Shapnaan Dongban died 11 years after the passage of his elder brother, Kwapda’as Rangna’an Samson Dongban, who was killed by a hit-and-run driver in Jos, Plateau State capital in 2011.

Photo news: FIDA Abuja chair celebrates brother on his Call to Bar

FIDA Nigeria Abuja members at the event
Madam Gold Uchenna Nwosu JP and her son Joseph
Hon. Augustine Odimuko Nwosu praying for his son
Mrs. Ogechi Abu a former national Publicity Secretary of FIDA offered some counsel to the new wig
The new wig
Toast to the new wig

Photo news: Awomolo SAN welcomes son into the legal profession

A son of Asiwaju A.S. Awomolo, (SAN) and his wife Chief Mrs. Victoria Awomolo, (SAN), Babatunde Lloyd Awomolo was among the over 1500 new wigs that recently joined the Nigerian bar.

Below are some photographs of the event.

Chief Awomolo, SAN and son Lloyd
After the call

Pastor ushers the new wig into the profession with prayers
Babatunde Lloyd Awomolo, Esq.

Akpata says no stone will remain unturned as Inibehe Effiong’s incarceration draws more outrage

By Lillian Okenwa

As indignation continues to mount against the incarceration of rights lawyer, Inibehe Effiong, the President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Olumide Akpata has assured that the NBA will “leave no stone unturned” in securing his release.

Meanwhile, the Civil Society Consortium on Civic Space and other rights groups are still pressing for Effiong’s immediate release from prison.

“I have received positive feedback from the NBA 1st Vice President Mr. John Aikpokpo Martins regarding our member, Inibehe Effiong who was incarcerated this week on allegations of contempt of court, “said Akpata.

He further confided: “As I advised on Thursday, the NBA 1st Vice President was instructed to travel to Akwa Ibom State and leave no stone unturned in ensuring the release of Mr. Effiong.  Mr. Aikpokpo Martins visited Inibehe at the Ikot Ekpene Correctional Centre in the company of the Chairman (NBA) Uyo Branch and has assured me that Inibehe is in good spirits. He has my mandate to remain in Akwa Ibom State and continue to work toward securing Mr Effiong’s release.”

On Wednesday, 27 July, the Chief Judge (CJ) of Akwa Ibom State, Hon. Justice Ekaette Obot, sent Effiong to one month in prison for raising safety concerns over the presence of armed mobile policemen in court.

According to a former president of the Civil Liberties Organisation (CLO) Ayo Obe: “If the learned CJ was not bringing the grievance of previous encounters and the pending application that she recuses herself to the proceedings, those openly armed police would not have been inside the court. It seems to me that she was not merely anticipating trouble, she intended to find it. Unfortunately, Counsel pre-empted her by complying with the order to proceed with the witness (despite the pending prayer for her recusal) so another casus belli had to be found…. Let me add the frivolity that GOK (Ajayi, SAN) often puts his hand in his pocket when examining a witness. In the days when I used to sew and made a tailored skirt from our grey striped fabric, I made sure to include pockets so that I could do the same…” One can only imagine what would happen to a lawyer who attempted this in Justice Ekaette Obot’s court.

The embattled lawyer was in court to defend Leo Ekpenyong, a lawyer, in a libel suit filed by Governor Udom Emmanuel of Akwa Ibom State.

In a statement on Sunday, the Civil Society Consortium on Civic Space accused the judge of taking sides with the state governor.  “It is disturbing that the chief judge of the state will descend to the arena of conflict and take sides with the governor in a matter that she ought to be an impartial judge,” the statement reads.

Similarly, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, (SERAP)  in a tweet, asked Governor Udom to order the release of the unlawfully detained lawyer.

“Akwa Ibom State Governor Udom Emmanuel must immediately and unconditionally release lawyer Inibehe Effiong, who has reportedly been sent to Uyo prison while in Court representing his client against the governor.” the group said, adding; “We will see in court if Effiong is not immediately released.”

In the same vein, African Action Congress, (AAC) and the Citizens Solutions Network, demanded that disciplinary action be taken against Justice Obot for what it described as reckless abuse of judicial authority and desecration of what ought to be the hallowed temple of justice.

Additionally, Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Femi Falana has vowed to secure the release of AAC’s National Legal Adviser, Inibehe Effiong.  Reacting to the incarceration, Falana maintained that he (Effiong) did not commit any offence to warrant his imprisonment, and assured that “we shall secure his release.”

Falana further disclosed that: “In 1986, Chief Gani Fawehinmi SAN was convicted for contempt in facie curiae and sentenced to 12 months imprisonment by Justice Ligali Ayorinde even though the maximum penalty is 3 months! The Court of Appeal freed him.

“In 1991, Justice Olugbani wanted to jail me for contempt ex facie curiae.  The Court of Appeal set aside the contempt proceedings.

“Mr. Effiong Inibebe filed an application praying the Chief Judge to recuse herself. The motion has not been heard. But the CJ has sent him to jail to purge himself of contempt!

“In Abiola v FRN the appellant asked the Chief Justice and 8 other Justices of the Supreme Court to recuse themselves from hearing his appeal. The Justices granted the prayer without convicting Abiola’s lawyer, the late Chief GOK Ajayi SAN.”

“Likewise, Olukayode Ajulo described Effiong’s imprisonment as an abuse of judicial authority.  Ajulo in a statement said, “The presiding judge, with respect, cannot be a judge in her case and our judges have been warned when faced with cases of contempt to be cautious in dealing with such cases. 

 “The Court of Appeal in the case of OBIUKWU v UGWUERUCHUKWU & ORS (2019) LPELR-46616(CA) has this to say to such situation; “Courts have always been admonished to be circumspect while handling contempt proceedings…

 “Contempt of Court was not meant to be wielded by the Court as an instrument of intimidation, or a club of offence, to harass and subjugate and hew down litigants, lawyers and persons within the precincts of the Court, or outside. Contempt is not meant to be used as a weapon or means of showing strength and power by the Judge.

 However, Adam Olori-Aje of Terseley Chambers, Abuja, and the Secretary-General, Muslim Lawyers Association of Nigeria (MULAN) touched on some more disturbing issues in the legal profession.  

“Imagine if NBA national election is every year, this would no doubt keep the momentum of display of sense of concern and welfare by our aspirants and candidates frequently. Can you imagine the rate at which the show of love and kindness on the part of those that contested elections just vanished into the thin air? The son of our President of the Court of Appeal died in his sleep some days ago, all our platforms have maintained dead silence on it. Different headlines would have been flying around. A Magistrate was bulldozed out of the police station in Ikorodu on official assignment, maybe one or two headlines found it worthy of reportage. I just hope that we as lawyers have not completely imbibed the same practice of politicians we criticised and vilified always in our own microcosm political life too. That won’t be good enough though. Let’s keep the momentum high, not necessarily during the electioneering campaign alone…”

It is time to impeach Muhammadu Buhari and remove him from office

By Chidi Anselm Odinkalu

This past week education came to a halt in Abuja, Nigeria’s Federal Capital Territory (FCT). It began with the order by the Minister of Education, Adamu Adamu, on 25 July closing down all six Federal Government Colleges (better known as Unity Schools) in the FCT while the students were in the middle of their end of year examinations. The reason for this order, according to the Minister was “a security breach on Sheda and Lambata villages, suburbs of Kwali Area Council which also threatened FGC Kwali.” He provided no details as to the nature or extent of the “security breach”.

In a separate announcement issued on the same day, the Education Secretariat of the FCT summarily informed “parents and guardians that the 2021/2022 academic calendar for FCT schools will come to an end on Wednesday, July 27th, 2022.” They did not much care to provide any justification for this measure. The assumption that the reason for the closure of all schools in the FCT was the same as that cited by the Minister of Education when he closed down the Unity Schools, does not necessarily explain the two more days of grace given by the FCT Administration to all the other schools in the FCT.

In the same week, the terrorists also forced Veritas University, a tertiary institution established by the Catholic Church in the FCT, to close down indefinitely.

On the same day that the Minister shuttered the Unity Schools in the FCT, by the way, it emerged that terrorists had killed an officer and two men of the elite Brigade of Guards of the Nigerian Army who were “reportedly ambushed after they visited the Nigeria Law School in Bwari following a distressed (sic) call from the authorities of the school.” According to the Daily Trust, “the school management was said to have alerted that terrorists had dropped a letter indicating an imminent attack on the school.” 

These were not the only soldiers killed in the FCT during the week. The day after the FCT Administration shut down all schools in the Federal Capital, around 28 July, armed terrorists reportedly attacked another military unit near Zuma Rock on the border between the FCT and Niger State, killing at least two soldiers in an attack which “lasted for almost one hour” during which no one in the command structure could mobilise assistance or reinforcements for the besieged soldiers.

This latest cascade of insecurity in Nigeria’s Federal Capital began with the attack on the Kuje Medium Security Prison in the capital city on 5 July, in which the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP) killed at least one security personnel and liberated over 900 of the most dangerous terrorists held or convicted by Nigeria in an operation that reportedly lasted over three hours.

Despite being in possession of advance notice of the attack, the administration of General Muhammadu Buhari took no measures to forestall or repel the attack. Instead, it appears they worked hard to encourage it. That is the only way to explain the report that soldiers who on guard around the prison perimeter were inexplicably redeployed away from that duty post less than 24 hours before the attack, a fact which could only have made the attack a lot easier for the perpetrators. No one has explained satisfactorily or at all how terrorism convicts and suspects of the most hardened type managed to end up in a medium security prison, which is what the Kuje prison is.

A few hours after the Kuje prison break, on 6 July, in Dutsinma, Katsina State in north-west Nigeria, a separate band of terrorists attacked General Buhari’s advance team heading to his village to prepare for his arrival for the Eid. On the same day, the police in the state confirmed that “an assistant commissioner of police Aminu Umar and another police officer were killed in a terrorist ambush in Dutsinma the same day.”

The Kuje prison break was the 14th under the watch of President Buhari, without consequences. His first Interior Minister served a full term. The current one remains in position and so does the president. These prison breaks have correlated positively with metastases of insecurity in the states in which they have occurred. Figures from the monitoring group, Nigeria Mourns, clearly demonstrate that the escalation of insecurity in Imo State and south-east Nigeria, for instance, is traceable to the prison break in Owerri, the Imo State capital on 5 April 2021 from which 1,844 dangerous prisoners and detainees escaped.

President Buhari’s response to this deterioration has been to amass Air Miles on an intense scale. The Kuje prison attack occurred exactly two days after President Buhari returned from a down-time visit to Portugal on 3 July. That was his 11th foreign trip in the preceding five months since the end of January, some of them undertaken at less than a whim. During the same period, the security situation in the FCT has gone into a meltdown. 

After the Kuje Prison break, General Buhari decided to attend a meeting of his National Security Council on Friday, 8 July. Predictably, the meeting was worse than inconclusive. The president, a worshipful Muslim, needed to observe his Jummat prayers on the day and, thereafter, had a flight to catch to his village for the Eid holidays. None of those could wait. Serious deliberations, it appears, were deferred until the president had concluded his Eid holidays. That was not to be until 21 July, by which date the terrorists recently freed from the Kuje Prison had time to deploy in and around the FCT. As this meeting took place, it appears, the terrorists unfolded a campaign of renewed terror within the territory.

With no sense of shame or irony, two days after terrorists killed three staff of his Guards Brigade; the day after his Minister of Education shut down leading public schools in the FCT because of insecurity, and the day before his FCT Administration shut down all schools in the same FCT, on 26 July, General Buhari flew off to “Monrovia, Liberia to, among other things, deliver an address bordering on West Africa’s security.”

When Boko Haram abducted 276 students of the Government Girls Secondary School (GGSS), Chibok, in Borno State on 14 April, 2014, it was novel, and unheard of. The incident triggered a high level presidential panel led by a former head of the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI), a Safe Schools Initiative, and an international campaign to #BringBackOurGirls. The All Progressives Congress (APC) created in the same year and led by Muhammadu Buhari, launched itself onto the political scene by calling on the National Assembly to “impeach President Goodluck Jonathan now.” The entire narrative of the Buhari presidential campaign was then configured around the promise that as a retired General he knew how to keep the country safe.

On the eighth anniversary of the Chibok Girls abduction in April 2022, a total of 11,536 schools were closed by insecurity and over 1,500 school children were in captivity, victims of mass abduction.  Seven years into his second misadventure in power, Muhammadu Buhari has routinised the mass abduction of school children, democratized insecurity and is now incapable of securing the Federal Capital. The Institute for Security Studies, (ISS) in South Africa now hazards that Nigeria under Buhari is “out of security options” and another article published by Al-Jazeera in the past week said that “Nigeria’s security forces are no longer able to protect themselves, let alone the public.”

At the beginning of the year, General Buhari informed Nigerians that he is tired and could not wait to return to his village. Six months later, in June 2022, he announced that the job of president is “tough” saying “I am eager to go.”

The first job of a president and commander-in-chief is not merely to protect his country; it is, even more, to protect his capital city. Above all, it is to care about his people. It is now clear that as President, Muhammadu Buhari is unable and unwilling to do any of these and is indeed incapable of doing so. In the circumstance, there is no case for him to continue as president. Nigerians should grant him his desire to retire.

The only option left in democratic politics is for the National Assembly to remove him through the process of impeachment. That is their democratic duty under the constitution. The cost of continuing to keep Buhari in office is the destruction of whatever remains of Nigeria. No one, surely not Buhari, is worth the price of the country. It is now time for the National Assembly to fulfill this duty and impeach Muhammadu Buhari as the president of Nigeria.

A lawyer and a teacher, Odinkalu can be reached at [email protected]

Are the challenges of the legal profession in Nigeria self-inflicted?

By Lillian Okenwa

When the Acting Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Hon. Justice Olukayode Ariwoola recently announced that the challenges of the legal profession are self-inflicted, he did not mince words. Delivering a keynote address at the NBA Section on Legal Practice (SLP) 2022 Annual Conference in Asaba, Delta State, the Acting CJN held thus: “In Nigeria, the challenges of the legal profession are self-inflicted. In such situations, the Nigerian Bar Association has a burden to ensure that legal practitioners keep to the ethics of the profession.”

Ariwoola, ACJN

His Lordship’s statement continues to reverberate; particularly in these times when the bar in Nigeria is on the spotlight for the wrong reasons.

Nigerian lawyers are presently divided in their opinion about the Body of Benchers (BoB) attitude in their last meeting towards the letter written by the President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Olumide Akpata. Akpata in the letter requested that the Chairman of the Body of Benchers (BoB), Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), recuses himself while a petition for professional misconduct against a Partner in his law firm is being investigated.

Even more troubling is the statement of the BOB Chairman who while addressing newly inducted lawyers days ago, told them to beware of persons who will want to pull them down at the height of their success. Differing views have visited these two separate incidents and others that emerged within this period. Here are some comments from Nigerian legal practitioners.

According to the Law Professor and a former Chairman of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) Chidi Anselm Odinkalu, “This report is a sad reflection on the BoB, with the most profound of respects. It is not about taking sides. For the sake of its credibility, even if the matter was not listed on the agenda, what happened to AOB? So, there were four past NBA presidents, two former Chief Justices, NBA representatives at the meeting, online and in the hall, including the former NBA reps who have become Life Benchers, and not a whimper?

Chidi Anselm Odinkalu

“The issue of service is a distraction. My understanding is that the letter was hand-delivered to the BoB secretary, 150 copies. It was sent to all members also by e-mail. The BoB Secretary reportedly declined to circulate the hard copy to members.  So there is no excuse. For four hours the BoB met. This is like Buhari going to Liberia after three members of the Brigade of Guards were killed in Abuja! The fact that this matter was not raised should frighten us all. It really should. Tomorrow, my brother, Jibrin Okutepa, SAN, will complain about indiscipline at the Bar. Like seriously real…?!”

Aikpokpo-Martins

NBA 1st Vice President, John Aikpokpo-Martins had his say. “We conveniently forget that all the representatives of the NBA in the BoB are all representatives of the NBA just like the president of the NBA in the BoB. They were sent there by the NBA to represent us. Like I always say, we never send real bar men there. 70% of our representatives in statutory bodies know next to nothing about the interest of the NBA. Anyway, we have done our part and history will be kind to us. I am extremely very proud of my brother, Olumide Akpata, and prouder still that history will record my signature on the petition to the LPDC.”

Akaraiwe, SAN

But Ikeazor Akaraiwe, SAN, a former 1st Vice President of NBA was of the opinion that Akpata should have raised the matter when everyone was silent. “Why would he want other people to raise the matter on his behalf? Is he not the president of the NBA to whom the majority of lawyers gave their mandate? Did he specifically delegate the authority to raise the matter to any other person, and the person did not? Did he not write that letter on the NBA letterhead and in the name of the NBA? In any case, since Olumide was in the meeting, albeit virtually, He should have raised it.”

However, Charles Okeibunor, lawyer and workplace transformation expert differed. “May I respectfully differ? Why would Olumide Raise it? Nemo judex in causa sua is trite. It is our principle. Assuming Olumide is not President. Is it not a personal disgrace to every member of the bar that our learned and revered senior ignores to recuse himself in a matter that affects him? Shouldn’t it be without saying? As a matter of personal integrity, this is what we should do. This is what we expect from every civilization, no less from lawyers.

Charles Okeibunor

“In the developed world, I shudder when a mere unfounded accusation precipitates resignation just to maintain integrity. Why should I write a letter, circulate it, and also champion it? Assuming without conceding that he was wrong, shall we say that if a member of the bar wrote that letter, it will take the author’s attendance for it to be raised? Assuming without conceding that he was wrong, shall we say that if a journalist who isn’t a member of the profession raised the concern, it will not be a subject of discussion in the meeting of nobles?

“Why are we called the noble profession? We are not rabble-rousers. We are gentlemen of the highest level of dignity and honour. In the final analysis. There is No blame in this game. It appears the shame is on us all.”

Bringing an interesting perspective to the debate, Akpata noted that this entire debate is ongoing because an influential lawyer is involved. “That is our system, hypocrisy and double standard all the way. “If na one lawyer wey no get Papa, wey no get Mama, they will be shouting, preaching like an archbishop… We play double standard, We like to pontificate, We are hypocrites.”

Olanipekun, SAN

During the recent Call to Bar ceremony, Olanipekun who saw the letter and call to recuse himself as an affront counselled the new wigs. “Appreciate those amongst you who are doing well rather than trying to pull them down. In other words, do not get enrolled in either a PHD course or School. And by PHD, I mean, Pull him/her down… I pray that in due season when God elevates each and every one of you and you become the cynosure of eyes, may no power principalities or blackmailer be able to bring you down.”

Dismayed at this position, Akaraiwe, SAN said: Your partner wrote a letter to an organisation soliciting them to become clients to your firm, and seducing them with your chairmanship of the Body of Benchers, and in fact advertising you as being above all judges and lawyers in the country.

“Now, the NBA requests you to recuse yourself from leading the BoB, which is the body saddled with the responsibility of disciplining any legal practitioner in Nigeria, until the investigation and disciplinary proceedings proposed to be undertaken against your partner and possibly all other partners of your firm are determined. And you say that the call to recuse yourself amounts to blackmail or pull-him-down syndrome??? Haba!

Aliyu, SAN

Curiously, an associate of Chief Olanipekun and a Senior Advocate of Nigeria Yomi Aliyu has brought tribalism into the debate. Chief Aliyu has threatened to mobilise Yoruba lawyers to defend the BoB chair.

Ogechi Abu

Advocating that this indeed is a dreadful mindset, a former Vice Chair of NBA Abuja, Mrs. Ogechi Abu remarked:   “For a SAN to drag tribalism into an objective professional matter, then cite a clear case of professional misconduct as an example of victimisation of a tribe is sad. Is anything more disheartening coming from such an exalted rank? What then can possibly be the justification to penalise any lawyer in this jurisdiction???? The show of shame is at the highest level.”

Insisting however that this contentious matter was brought to the public space by Henry Odein Ajumogobia, SAN is gaining traction because ‘big men’ are involved, Damilola Mumuni, a Lagos lawyer told his story.

Ajumogobia, SAN

“In 2019, I sued a lawyer at the Ikorodu Magistrate Court, where I obtained judgement against him in the sum of N450,000 after he had fraudulently represented that he had land to sell to me for farming purposes and he had none to show me or deliver possession.

“My decision to take him to court was because after two years he did nothing. This lawyer did not appear in court and only told me he would not comply with the judgment and would frustrate any attempt to enforce same since he also is a lawyer. On the basis of his threat, I decided to file a petition against him, and till date nothing has been done.

“I involved Lagos branch which is my Branch, Ikorodu Branch; the branch of the lawyer, and now LPDC. At the level of the branches, there was this reluctance to take action, especially in my branch where the claim was that the lawyer is not a member of the branch. The lawyer’s branch was only trying to tell me to settle and all that. The lawyer’s boss pulled his weight and nothing was done.

“Now at the LPDC level, we have since joined issues but nothing has been heard. I ordinarily believe that in this age of technological advancement, we should be more proactive in addressing issues of this nature and not wait until a big fish is caught. Now about three years after my judgement and almost two years after filing at the LPDC, this lawyer is walking freely without any consequence and I’m made to look like a fool for trusting the system.”

All said, the question is — Are the challenges of the legal profession in Nigeria self-inflicted? Answers are still awaited.

His continued stay in office will come at a cost to the integrity of our profession – JRP

Justice Reform Project (JRP), a coalition of Nigerians across the legal profession, civil society and the general public who are stakeholders in a justice system have joined the call for Chief ‘Wole Olanipekun (SAN) to step down from his position as Chairman of the Body of Benchers.

JRP holds that the “learned silk’s continued stay in office is, consequently, an indiscretion which will come at a cost to the integrity of our profession.”

Here is the full text of their statement titled: A stand for the integrity of the Nigerian Legal Profession

In the past week, we observed the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) take courageous steps to uphold ethical standards in the Nigerian legal profession. These steps have been met with commendation by a majority of the bar and, although disappointing, a minority dissent in a matter of significant public interest is to be expected, even in the most clear-cut circumstances. These dissents are, however, indicative of the rot in our profession which prompted the founding of the Justice Reform Project (JRP) and which necessitates this public statement.

The facts underlying the conduct of the primary actor, Ms Adekunbi Ogunde are undisputed. The content of her offending email is deeply damaging, insinuating that Chief ‘Wole Olanipekun SAN is capable of unduly procuring a judgment in favour of his client. Ms Kunbi herself has admitted that this may be unprofessional conduct but feigns ignorance of the Rules. No doubt, it is for the LPDC to reach a final verdict on culpability and the extent of any mitigating circumstances. The circumstances underlying this breach, however, have far-reaching ethical implications for the leadership of the bar and, in particular, the Chairman of the Body of Benchers, Chief Wole Olanipekun, SAN.

That the learned silk is a leader of the bar is undisputed, his position as Chairman of the Body of Benchers merely confirms it. Leadership commands respect but is also a burden, a responsibility. It requires exemplary conduct, and every action/inaction by a leader of the bar sets an example for years to come. That a person of his standing is embroiled in circumstances, which indicate less than optimal standards of conduct, is far from ideal. These are not frivolous allegations; they are comments which warrant investigation. In the face of public allegations of egregious professional misconduct affecting his practice, his responsibility as a leader of the bar imposes an obligation on him to place the integrity of the profession first.

JRP takes the position that the learned silk ought to step down from his position as Chairman of the Body of Benchers to enable investigations to be concluded with the requisite confidence. This should have predated the steps taken by the NBA and subsequent public commentary. Such an action on his part would not be a mark of culpability, it would be a matter of responsibility and honour. In his exalted position, he should ordinarily be instigating such a complaint.

JRP notes that the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC) is a committee of the Body of Benchers, and even though it is a separate and independent arm of the Body of Benchers, members of the LPDC are nominated and appointed by the Body of Benchers, usually by the Chairman. The learned silk’s continued stay in office is, consequently, an indiscretion which will come at a cost to the integrity of our profession. The tribal sentiments being stoked by senior members of the bar are not helpful. Neither are allegations of witch-hunting or ulterior motives.

On a related note, the innuendos in the learned silk’s speech at the Call to Bar ceremony, suggesting that opposing views were indicative of a ‘pulling down syndrome’, can only reinforce the call for his resignation, even though a formal complaint against him has not been lodged.

The NBA, and its leadership, must be commended for taking a bold step in upholding the standards of our profession, even in circumstances involving a man who commands an enormous amount of respect from the entire profession. This is the true test of our will to revive our dying profession and, all of us, including the learned silk, have a responsibility to put the profession first in circumstances like this.

Finally, we recognize commentary which suggests that the NBA faltered by not contacting the learned silk informally beforehand. While comments on whether this show of courtesy was necessary will remain divisive given their cultural rather than legal underpinnings, it is important not to lose sight of the issues on ground. The factual inconsistencies regarding the delivery of the letter are also a relatively small matter. The NBA leadership has done its job. Their actions have marked a new era in the enforcement of ethical standards in the legal profession and we must all stand behind the NBA to ensure the integrity of our profession.

Justice Reform Project

Lagos, 29 July 2022