Home Blog Page 426

The Rising Popularity of Bicameral State Houses of Assembly in Nigeria: Obasa’s Senate and Merinda’s House of Representatives

By Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja

On a lighter note!!!

For those who do not know, the word “Bicameral” means

“Having, consisting of, or based on two legislative chambers…
a bicameral legislature comprising the House of Representatives and the Senate”.

In a previous article, I had written that one of the common phenomenon in Nigeria is that, what obtains in actual practice or reality is often 100% different from what the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 or any other law prescribes.

Chapter 1, Section 4 of the Nigerian Constitution states that the Nigerian National Assembly is a Bicameral legislature while the legislatures of the State Houses of Assembly of the 36 States of Nigeria are unicameral (only chamber).

However, in actual practice, we now have at least two States of Nigeria (Lagos State and Rivers State) wherein they are operating Bicameral legislature with two Houses of Assembly led by different persons laying claim to the position of Speaker of each of the said Houses of Assembly.

In the case of Rivers State, the two Houses of Assembly have been in existence since December 2024. While in the case of Lagos State, since 13th January 2025, two speakers have emerged.

Interestingly, Nigeria’s Presidential system of government is modelled after the United States of America (USA) model wherein the legislatures of the 50 States are bi-cameral as is the national/federal legislature (the US Congress).

So what is there to stop States in Nigeria that can afford it from running bi-cameral legislatures, if they can afford it?

Ironically, Lagos State and Rivers State are in the league of the States with highest internally generated revenue (IGR) or income, therefore, it is logical that they can afford to sustain the expenses associated with bi-cameral legislatures.

Rivers State is already bearing the costs of concurrently running the expenses of the two legislatures since December 2024.

All that needs to be done now is to make it official: by naming one of the legislatures as “Senate” while the other be named “House of Representatives”.

In the case of Lagos State, naturally, the Obasa faction would be named as the “Senate of Lagos State of Nigeria” because Obasa has pedigree of being a Speaker since the year 2015!!!

As for Rivers State, since the Supreme Court of Nigeria has already assumed jurisdiction over the matter, we shall allow them to do the naming!!!

Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja,
Executive Director,
Nigerian Law Society (NLS).

Lagos lawmakers insist Meranda is speaker, reject Obasa

Members of the Lagos State House of Assembly have rejected Mudashiru Obasa as the Speaker of their parliament.

Speaking with journalists at the assembly complex on Thursday, the lawmakers refuted Obasa’s claim that he remains the speaker.

The 36 lawmakers reaffirmed their support for the current speaker, Mojisola Meranda, insisting that she is the speaker of the assembly.

The Chairman of the House Committee on Information, Security and Strategy, Steven Ogundipe, stated that the lawmakers remained committed to ensuring that Obasa’s removal stands.

Ogundipe also called on the All Progressives Congress leadership in Lagos to intervene in the leadership crisis.

He said, “We were approached by our leaders that we should remain calm and take things easy. But we are surprised to see what is happening here today.

“We won’t take laws into our hands, just as we told the staff not to take laws into our hands. But we all belong to different constituencies, and we have our mandate. Whatever has to happen, the leadership should speak with us and not this charade we are seeing.

“We are not happy; we have been law-abiding. We have not gone out of our way against the state. We also want to be respected and to be given our dignity. To be shown that we are elected. I’m appealing to the leadership of our party that we cannot continue this way.”

Meanwhile, two lawmakers—Ayinde Akinsanya (Mushin Constituency I) and Noheem Adams (Mushin Constituency II)—were spotted accompanying Obasa into the Assembly complex.

PUNCH Online reports that Obasa, alongside security officials, had stormed the assembly complex and entered the Speaker’s Office around 12 noon on Thursday.

The development followed the withdrawal of the security aides of the Speaker, Mojisola Meranda.

The assembly has been embroiled in a leadership crisis since Obasa’s removal as speaker and the subsequent election of Meranda.

Obasa was accused by over 90 per cent of the lawmakers of poor leadership style, perpetual lateness to legislative functions and plenary, high-handedness and disregard for colleague lawmakers and the executive, especially the governor, abuse of office and privileges, intimidation and oppression of members among others.

In an attempt to resolve the crisis, some All Progressives Congress bigwigs, notably former governors of Osun, Ogun and Lagos states, Chief Bisi Akande, Segun Osoba, and Akinwunmi Ambode, respectively, among others, on the directive of President Bola Tinubu, had a series of meetings last weekend with political stakeholders in the state including members of the assembly.

The PUNCH learnt at the end of the meetings that both Obasa and Meranda might be stepping aside for another lawmaker to lead the house.

A member of the Governors Advisory Council, Chief Muraina Taiwo, noted that one of the seven lawmakers from Lagos West was being considered by the party leaders as the new Speaker.

Fraud: EFCC arraigns lawyer for allegedly stealing dead client’s N41m

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has arraigned an Enugu-based lawyer, Ifeanyichukwu Okonkwo, before an Enugu State High Court presided by Justice E.N. Oluedo, following an allegation of N41 million fraud.

According to a statement by Dele Oyewale, EFCC spokesperson, Okonkwo is facing a single count of stealing by conversion, in violation of Section 342 of the Criminal Code Law of Enugu State.

The charge alleges that on November 23, 2015, Okonkwo fraudulently converted N41 million received from one Onyishi Maduka Samuel on behalf of the family of the late Ifemelunma Okoye, while acting as the liquidator of Ifemelunma and Company Enterprises Limited.

The EFCC noted that Okonkwo pleaded not guilty to the charge.

Ajobiewe Enitan, EFCC’s prosecution counsel, requested a trial date and asked the court to remand the defendant to a correctional facility.

However, Okonkwo, who represented himself in court, applied to continue enjoying bail previously granted to him by  H.O. Eya (Justice) in an earlier arraignment on the same matter in June 2022.

Oluedo granted his request and adjourned the trial to May 13, 14, and 15, 2025.

Sidi Bage, Ejembi Eko, Ozekhome, Ezeilo, others inducted Life Benchers, 21 new Benchers join prestigious assembly

  • Ex-CJN Belgore, Fmr. PCA Umaru Abdullahi, Awomolo, task Benchers on upholding integrity in the legal profession

[Full List of Inductees]

Nigeria’s Body of Benchers led by Asiwaju Adegboyega S. Awomolo (SAN), on Thursday inducted the retired justice of the Supreme Court and Emir of Lafia, HRM. Hon. Justice Sidi Bage, JSC. another ex-Justice of the Supreme Court, Hon. Justice Ejembi Eko, JSC, Leader of the Senate, Senator Opeyemi Bamidele; human rights lawyer, Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN), former United Nations Special Rapporteur on Trafficking persons in Africa, Prof. Joy Ngozi Ezeilo (SAN) and other prominent legal practitioners as life members of the prestigious body.

A total of 21 new Benchers were inducted while eight new Life Benchers were added, bringing the total number of Life Benchers in Nigeria to 170.

Addressing the newly inducted Life Benchers and Benchers at the Benchers Complex, Abuja, Awomolo, SAN, charged them with the words: “To whom much is given, much is expected. You must set the right values for young lawyers in and out of court.”

Chief Awomolo who described the ceremony as landmark, being the first formal induction and orientation of Benchers in the history of the Body, emphasized its crucial role in upholding the highest ethical and professional standards in the Nigerian legal profession, reminding inductees that their elevation came with significant responsibilities.

The event was graced by distinguished legal luminaries, including Hon. Justice Alfa Belgore, former Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), who delivered a keynote address on the importance of upholding ethics and decorum in the legal profession. Justice Belgore emphasized the need for Benchers to serve as role models for younger lawyers and to maintain the highest standards of integrity and professionalism.

Hon. Justice Umaru Abdullahi, a former President of the Court of Appeal, gave a historical overview of the Body of Benchers, tracing its establishment to the Legal Practitioners Amended Decree No. 15 of 1975. He highlighted the Body’s evolution and its critical role in regulating the legal profession in Nigeria.

A former Administrator of the National Judicial Institute (NJI) and Ex-Chief Justice of Delta State, Hon. Justice Rosaline Bozimo also addressed the assemblage, stressing the importance of instilling decorum and ethical values in law students from the outset. He called for a renewed focus on mentorship and guidance for the next generation of legal practitioners.

In a thought-provoking speech, Kanu Agabi, SAN, lamented the growing influence of wealth over righteousness and ethics in society. He urged the newly inducted Benchers to prioritize moral values and to use their positions to promote justice and fairness.

The ceremony featured the presentation of certificates to the new inductees. Umaru Abdullahi presented certificates to the newly confirmed Life Benchers, while Hon. Justice Alfa Belgore presented certificates to the newly inducted Benchers.

In his remarks, Asiwaju Adegboyega S. Awomolo, SAN, Chairman of the Body of Benchers, expressed his honor at presiding over the historic event. He noted that this was the first time such an orientation and induction ceremony had been organized in the Body’s history.

Awomolo recounted the Body’s origins, highlighting that it was established with 16 members, with Chief Ambassador C. D. Orike being the only surviving founding member. He explained that the Body of Benchers is the highest regulatory authority for the legal profession in Nigeria, tasked with determining who is fit and proper to be admitted as a legal practitioner.

The Chairman emphasized the Body’s role in collaborating with the Nigerian Law School to ensure the quality of legal education and its responsibility in disciplinary matters, including the power to strike off erring legal practitioners from the roll.

Awomolo outlined the privileges of being a Bencher, including the right to sponsor aspirants to the Bar, attend Call to Bar ceremonies, and participate in Traditional Law Dinners. Life Benchers, he noted, enjoy the exclusive right to sit in the inner bar or front row in court and mention motions out of turn.

He also stressed the importance of seniority, proper conduct, and adherence to the Body’s regulations, warning against exposing internal matters to social media, which he described as misconduct punishable by the Body.

The Chairman charged the new inductees to live up to the expectations of their exalted positions, reminding them that “to whom much is given, much is expected.” He urged them to actively participate in the Body’s activities and to set the right values for young lawyers.

The following distinguished legal practitioners were inducted as Life Benchers and Benchers during the ceremony:

Life Benchers

  1. Hon. Justice Adarna Iyayi-Lamikanra
  2. Hon. Justice Ngozi P. Emehelu
  3. Hon. Justice Mosunmola Dipeolu
  4. Chief Offiong E.B. Offiong, SAN
  5. Olori Olufunmi Oluyede, NRM
  6. Prof. Isa Hayatu Chiroma, SAN
  7. Razak Osayande Isenalumhe, Esq
  8. Lady Gloria Umoren
  9. Prof. Mike Ozekhome, CON, SAN
  10. Prof. Joy Ngozi Ezeilo, OON, SAN
  11. Rt. Hon. Yakubu Dogara, CFR
  12. Mr. Solomon Umoh, SAN
  13. Opeyemi Bamidele, Senator
  14. Michael Idele, CON
  15. A. K. Jingi, Esq
  16. Hon. Justice John T. Tsoho, OFR
  17. Hon. Justice Ejembi Eko
  18. (HRH) Hon. Justice Sidi Bage, CFR
  19. Hon. Justice Fatima Ommi Akinbami

Benchers

  1. Dr. Muhammed Alimi Abdul-Razaq, SAN
  2. Chief Chris Uche, SAN
  3. Hon. Eberechi Adele, SAN
  4. Mr. Jude Nnodum, OFR, SAN
  5. Dr. Livy Uzoukwu, OON, SAN
  6. Mr. Tunde Oyewole
  7. Mr. Mohammed Bello Adoke, CFR, SAN
  8. Hon. Justice Nwaigwe A. Anselm
  9. Sen. Ibn Na’Allah
  10. Mr. Mahmud Abubakar Magaji, SAN
  11. Mr. Y. C. Maikyau, OON, SAN
  12. Mr. Faruk Sani
  13. Prof. Sani Muhammad Adam
  14. Mr. Adegboruwa Ebun-Olu Samuel, SAN
  15. Chief (Mrs.) Victoria O. Awomolo, SAN
  16. Mr. Emeka Obegolu, SAN
  17. Marvel E. Akpoyibo, Esq
  18. Dr. Solomon Arase, CFR
  19. Kehinde O. Ogunwumiju, OFR, SAN
  20. Hon. Onofiok Akpan Luke

The induction ceremony concluded with a reaffirmation of the Body of Benchers’ commitment to upholding the highest standards of the legal profession. The event not only celebrated the achievements of the new inductees but also reinforced the importance of ethics, decorum, and professionalism in the Nigerian legal system.


Billionaire oil magnate Folorunso Alakija reportedly loses sight

Nigerian billionaire Folorunso Alakija has lost her sight, according to medical sources involved in her care.

A report by SaharaReporters said that the 73-year-old founder and Executive Vice Chairman of Famfa Oil began experiencing health issues after a near-air mishap.

She was travelling with her husband, Modupe Alakija, Chairman of Famfa Oil when the incident caused a spike in her blood pressure.

The distressing event was said to have affected her vision.

Following the incident, Alakija reportedly ordered a new jet to avoid travelling on the same flight as her husband.

However, her vision continued to deteriorate until she ultimately lost her sight completely.

“She had a near air mishap with her husband on board and her blood pressure reportedly shot up affecting her eyes,” one of the sources quoted in the report said.

“She has been having eyesight issues, but instead of treating the illness, she chose to start a church to help her.

“Now she can’t see.”

Folorunso Alakija is a Nigerian billionaire businesswoman and philanthropist who began hosting a small fellowship in her home around 2004, which eventually grew into the Rose of Sharon Glorious Ministry International.

On her 69th birthday, she was ordained as an Apostle.

She is the founder of Famfa Oil, a Nigerian company with a significant stake in OML 127, a highly profitable oil block located on the Agbami deep water oilfield in Nigeria.

According to Forbes, her net worth was estimated at $1 billion as of 2020.

In 2015, she was ranked as the 87th most powerful woman in the world by Forbes and was one of only two African women on Forbes’ list of the richest people in Africa.

Alakija pursued secretarial studies at Pitman Central College in London in the 1970s.

She began her career as an executive secretary at Sijuade Enterprises in Lagos in 1974.

Her wealth is reflected not only in her business ventures but also in her taste for luxury.

One of the aircraft linked to her is a Bombardier Global Express XRS (model BD-700-1A10) with serial number 9416, registered to Wings of Grace Limited on November 25, 2011. This jet has the tail number VP-CEO.

Flight records show that it departed from the Murtala Muhammed International Airport in Lagos on February 26 for an undisclosed location.

She also owns a Bombardier Global Express 6000 private jet known for its long-range capabilities and luxury amenities. It offers a range of up to 6,000 nautical miles with a cruising speed of Mach 0.89.

The jet’s cabin is designed for maximum comfort, featuring advanced entertainment systems, fully equipped workspaces, and premium seating. This aircraft is registered under the tail number VP-CTO.

Records show that it departed Lagos at 11:34 WAT on February 24 and arrived in London, UK at 4:18 GMT on February 25.

Folorunso Alakija is involved in several companies, including Famfa Oil Limited, Rose of Sharon Group and Dayspring Property Development Company Limited.

● Connection To Babangida

Alakija’s first company was a fashion label whose customers included the wife of former dictator Ibrahim Babangida.

The Nigerian government awarded Alakija’s company an oil prospecting licence in 1993, which was later converted to an oil mining lease.

The Agbami field has been operating since 2008.

Folorunso Alakija’s journey to acquiring an oil block was closely linked to her connection with Maryam Babangida, the late wife of the former dictator.

In the late 1980s, Folorunso Alakija was a successful fashion designer, running a high-end fashion label, Supreme Stitches, which catered to Nigeria’s elite, including Maryam Babangida.

Through her fashion business, Alakija developed a close relationship with Maryam, who was influential as Nigeria’s First Lady at the time.

In 1993, Folorunso Alakija applied for an oil prospecting licence. At that time, Nigeria’s military government was granting oil blocks to indigenous companies to encourage local participation in the petroleum industry.

She was awarded an Oil Prospecting Licence (OPL) by General Babangida’s regime.

It is widely believed that her close relationship with Maryam Babangida played a significant role in securing the license.

Initially, the oil block was considered high-risk and of low value. However, after partnering Texaco (now Chevron) for exploration, it was discovered to contain significant reserves, transforming it into one of Nigeria’s most lucrative oil blocks.

This discovery drastically increased her wealth, making her one of the richest women in Africa.

The Nigerian government attempted to reclaim the oil block in 2000, but Alakija fought a legal battle to retain her stake.

In 2008, the Nigerian Supreme Court ruled in her favour, restoring her 60% share in the block.

So, her connection with the Babangida family played a pivotal role in her journey from a fashion entrepreneur to a billionaire oil magnate.

● IBB Book Launch

On February 20, 2025, Alakija attended the launch of Babangida’s book, “A Journey in Service,” held at the Transcorp Hilton Hotel in Abuja.

The event also served as a fundraiser for the IBB Presidential Library. While Alakija made a donation, she chose not to publicly disclose the amount.

The event was graced by numerous dignitaries, including President Bola Tinubu, former Nigerian leaders Olusegun Obasanjo, Goodluck Jonathan, Yakubu Gowon, and Abdulsalami Abubakar, as well as former Vice Presidents Atiku Abubakar, Namadi Sambo, and Yemi Osinbajo. Notable business figures such as Aliko Dangote and Abdulsamad Rabiu also attended, with Dangote pledging N8 billion, which could rise by a further N2 billion annually if the project extended beyond four years and Rabiu donating N5 billion towards the library project.

Meanwhile, there have been reports suggesting that Alakija and her husband, Modupe Alakija, have separated after over 30 years of marriage.

These reports, which emerged around March 2024, indicate that the couple has been living apart due to personal differences.

However, there has been no official confirmation from the Alakija family regarding their marital status.

SaharaReporters

Abacha, IBB and the burden of history, By Olusegun Adeniyi

One of the grandchildren of the late General Sani Abacha attacked General Ibrahim Babangida last weekend in an angry post on X. Titled, ‘My grandfather saved the life of a coward’, it features a photo of Babangida and Abacha holding hands. But the first line carries the punch: “If the lifespans of these two consequential figures were reversed, this treachery would never be discharged by General Abacha.” While I am not interested in the family feud between the Babangidas and the Abachas, there is an important lesson we should not miss: Those who hold the levers of power must always be mindful of the consequences of their actions – not only on themselves but on their families.

That lesson may be lost on the dead, but it is important for the living. On that score, I sympathise with the Abacha family. People may react differently to the dark or heroic parts of their ancestry, but I understand that it can be upsetting to hear unpleasant tales about those we love. “It’s generally not in human character to be all good or all bad–maybe there are positive features of a disgraced ancestor that go some way to compensate or counterbalance whatever evil they did…” Daniel Maurice wrote in ‘How to deal with unwelcome family history discoveries.’ But where such people held positions of public trust, there is practically nothing anybody can do to change perceptions shared by many.

One may argue that Abacha is the only villain today because he is dead. That is the cross his family may have to carry. But the ultimate lesson is for those who are still alive. Speaking on the desperation for power that fuels all kinds of misbehaviour by politicians and public officials in the country, former President Goodluck Jonathan made a profound statement last week, “We, Nigerians, celebrate the wrong thing. And I believe one day, the country will get to the level where people will reject bad behaviour…” said Jonathan who then added: “Maybe one day, we will have two big buildings in Abuja where we will put pictures of people—whether dead or alive—who have messed up this country so that their grandchildren will know their forefathers were part of Nigeria’s problems.”

Last Thursday, a friend forwarded to me a crisp message: “Today in Abuja, all the oppressors of Nigeria gathered in one room. To celebrate one of their own.” If we examine the message from the prism of political leadership, assembled were General Yakubu Gowon who spent nine years in power; Chief Olusegun Obasanjo who spent 11 years in power (in both military and civilian capacity); Babangida who spent eight years; General Abdulsalami Abubakar who spent a year (less just a few days); Dr Goodluck Jonathan who spent five years and President Bola Tinubu who is nudging towards his second-year anniversary. So, cumulatively, these men have led the country for 36 of the last 60 years. When you combine that with all the richest men and women in the country as well as numerous former vice presidents, serving and former ministers, serving and former governors, against the background of the reality of Nigerian condition, it is difficult to fault the message.

What is remarkable is that anyone who has followed the overwhelming reactions to Babangida’s book would think that the only thing he wrote about was the June 12 election. There is so much more to read and learn about the complexities of policy, governance, issues of nation building, what it meant to be a military leader, and of course snippets of our history. But June 12, the Babangida albatross, overrides everything else. Without the annulment of that election, Babangida’s era could easily have gone down as transformative. And evidence abounds: Third Mainland Bridge, relocation of the Federal Capital to Abuja, Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC), liberalization of the banking sector and electronic media, private participation in the oil and gas sector. etc. Despite these historic achievements, the only thing that comes to mind at the mention of Babangida is the annulment of June 12. And as we have seen, it will take more than one book to change that. In life, some conditions are permanent.

Meanwhile, contrary to what some readers think, I am not writing a new book on the June 12 crisis. As a reporter during the era, I wrote four self-published books that are no longer readily available. The first, ‘Fortress on Quicksand’ was on the futile efforts by 23 presidential aspirants in the defunct Social Democratic Party (SDP) and National Republican Convention (NRC) before they were all disqualified and banned from contesting elections. It took me several months to get an old copy. The second, ‘POLITRICKS: National Assembly under Military Dictatorship’, detailed the intrigues of Babangida’s civilian legislature as a military president. Although originally printed at a shop in Mushin in August 1994, I republished it in 2010 with a foreword by then Senate President David Mark, a retired Brigadier General who happened to be one of the central characters in the June 12 story. The third, ‘Abiola’s Travails’ was published in August 1997 to mark his (Abiola’s) 60th birthday at a period he was in detention. ‘The Last 100 Days of Abacha’ was written in 2005 to warn against ‘Third Term’. So, what I have just done is to combine (and edit) them into one book for release, hopefully in June this year.

Since Abacha is no more, it is unfortunate for his family that they will have to carry the burden of what is in the public domain about their late patriarch. But for Babangida, the lesson of the moment is also clear: One single chapter can define a book. And a single action can define a life!

What is the Population of Nigeria?

In June 2013, then National Population Commission (NPC) chairman, Eze Festus Odimegwu, inadvertently spoke to the architecture of electoral malpractices in Nigeria. Responding to the request for assistance on constituency delimitation exercise by then Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Chairman, Professor Attahiru Jega, Odimegwu said “The enumeration centers we have, some of them do not exist in reality. Some politicians bought them the way you will want to register voters, and some people will buy voter cards in order to have an advantage.” It goes without saying that once the number of enumeration areas is compromised, the integrity of the outcome of such exercise (whether census or election) becomes doubtful.

But the real issue here is not about how our politicians try to ‘rig elections at source’. Rather it is the difficulty in ascertaining the real population of Nigeria without which there can be no proper planning. The United Nations (UN) recommends a national census enumeration for every country at least once every ten years. The last census in Nigeria was conducted 19 years ago in 2006! “I don’t know how long we will keep running away from census, and we keep deceiving and lying to ourselves, by running away from the truth,” former President Olusegun Obasanjo whose administration conducted the last census told the current NPC Chairman, Mr Isa Kwarra, during a courtesy call on him in Abeokuta three years ago.

At a meeting with a delegation from the NPC on Monday, President Bola Tinubu proposed to set up a committee that will solve the logistical problems that hamper the conduct of a new national census. “We must ascertain who we are, how many we are, and how to manage our data,” the president reportedly told his audience, including the Minister of Budget and Economic Planning Atiku Bagudu. “Without an accurate census, we can’t successfully plan for employment, agriculture and food security.”

As much as I agree with the president, he—perhaps more than anyone else—knows quite well that Nigeria has had a chequered history of attempting to count its population. Virtually every effort to conduct a credible national census has ended in controversy, acrimony and rejection by one section of the country or the other. Two (1973 and 1991) were in fact annulled. Perhaps more ironic is that one of the people described as “Confusionists” by Obasanjo for disputing the 2006 Population Census report is Tinubu. Lagos State, according to then Governor Tinubu, had 17,553,924 residents as against the 9,013,534 he claimed was ‘allocated’ by the NPC. “The figure is totally rejected … The database is faulty. It has to be discarded,” Tinubu said at the time.

I once took time to study population figures in several countries. Over the last 100 years, the annual growth rate is mostly between 1 and 3. I then juxtaposed this with that of pre-independence and post-independence Nigeria. In 1911 for instance, our population was 15.9 million but ten years later in 1921, it had become 18.7 million—an increase of 2.8 million. In 1931, the figure had increased by 1.3 million to give us a population of 20 million. Instructively, all these were consistent with the global pattern. The next census took place 21 years later in 1952 by which time our population was 30.3 million people. But from that period, things changed.

With independence and its politics, the 1962 census gave us an extra population of 14.9 million people, thus pushing the threshold to 45.6 million. A year later (when another census was conducted) an extra 10.5 million Nigerians had been added to give us a contentious figure of 55.7 million that was eventually discarded. Ten years later in 1973, another set of 24.1 million Nigerians had come on board to make 79.76 million, although that census figure was also jettisoned. There was no census until 1991 when our population was put at 88.5 million. The census that would follow came in 2006 by which time (within a period of 15 years), another 51.5 million Nigerians had been added to the population data to make 140 million people.

The implication of the foregoing is that between 1911 and 1952, our population grew from 18.7 million to 30.3 million, an increase of 62 percent in 41 years. But between 1952 and 2006, a period of 44 years, the same population grew from 30.3 million to 140 million, an increase of about 360 percent! How can we sustain a system based on such transparent fraud?

Why is a simple ‘headcount’ such a difficult thing to do in Nigeria? I suggest it is because population determines how much each of the 36 states and 774 local government areas collect from the Consolidated Revenue Fund (CRF) disbursed monthly by the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC). Yet, at no other time has a real census been more critical than now to allow for proper national planning. We must wean our nation of the distributive politics of oil rent that is at the root of corruption in our country, including in our politics and data collection.

Indeed, the absence of credible data accounts in large part for the state of our nation today. For instance, in a report on the mismanagement of the oil and gas sector in Nigeria in 2016, the Economist wrote: “…oil is also being stolen at a record rate and traders’ figures show output at well below the government’s figures. Information about Africa’s biggest oil industry is an opaque myriad of numbers. No one knows which ones are accurate; no one knows how much oil Nigeria actually produces. If there were an authoritative figure, the truly horrifying scope of corruption would be exposed.”

The census provides requisite information needed by the government to develop policies that will help run effective public services. We therefore need credible data about our population and the different demographics if we are to successfully tackle the challenges that plague our country. But until we see population counts as an instrument for economic planning rather than for the allocation of rent (unearned resources), census will continue to be a problem in Nigeria. Sadly, with ethnic/sectional cleavages already becoming more and more pronounced two years to the next election, how do we conduct a census which will produce an outcome that is both credible and acceptable in a nation of distrustful people?

The ball is now squarely in President Tinubu’s court!

• You can follow me on my X (formerly Twitter) handle, @Olusegunverdict and on www.olusegunadeniyi.com

Amid UN Security Council vote in favour of U.S. resolution of Russia-Ukraine war, satellite images show hundreds of North Korean troops likely transported to a secluded Russian port

A Russian landing ship comes and goes from the port of Dunai, in Russia’s far east, on November 30. Researchers have been tracking Russian ships believed to be used for transfers of North Korean troops. James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies/Planet Labs PBC

As negotiations appear to be underway to resolve the Russia- Ukraine war, CNN reports that Hundreds of North Korean troops were likely transported by sea to Russia to fight in its war against Ukraine.

According to a new analysis from a US-based think tank shared exclusively with CNN, Satellite images have revealed the troops being ferried to Russia.

On Monday, the UN Security Council voted in favour of a U.S. Government resolution on Ukraine that called for a rapid end to the war but did not name Russia as the aggressor.

This is the first time that the most powerful UN body has reached a joint decision on the war. Ten countries voted in favour of the resolution and five abstained, thereby reaching the required majority.

At least two Russian naval ships are believed to have moved North Korean soldiers to a Russian military port in Dunai, in the far east, in October and November, according to researchers at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, in California.

The ship transfers were first identified by the South Korean National Intelligence Service (NIS), which said in a press release last year that some soldiers were transported via the North Korean port areas of Chongjin, Hamhung and Musudan. But the South Korean agency only offered a grainy radar image at the time.

Read Also: US and Ukraine agree to massive military aid in exchange for US exploration and mining of natural resources

“I don’t think that the Russians or the North Koreans want these transfers caught on camera,” Sam Lair, a research associate at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies, told CNN. “The secrecy element is quite remarkable.”

Now, researchers have verified that during the same time period of the troop transfers reported by South Korea intelligence, the Russian vessels identified by the spy agency docked at Dunai port in a remote, eastern part of Russia.

In North Korea, soldiers likely boarded these ships at night, making it difficult to capture evidence of the transfers, researchers said. But satellite images have revealed activities at Dunai, “where it appears the Russians have been less careful.”

For example, in one satellite image from Planet Labs, a crane can be seen extending to one of Russia’s naval landing ships, which researchers believe is the Nikolay Vilkov, at the port on October 17, and a covered cargo truck is on the dock next to it. By October 20, the crane is retracted, and it appears a transfer of soldiers is complete.

Researchers could identify the Russian “Ropucha-class” and “Alligator-class” ships in the satellite images because they match with photos captured by the Japanese Defense Ministry in March 2022, when the vessels passed through Japanese waters.

Each landing ship is believed to have capacity to hold several hundred soldiers, possibly as many as 400, according to the researchers.

Lair explained that Dunai is a secure military facility, making it much more conducive to under-the-radar transfers than the large, nearby port of Vladivostok, which is in an area where civilians live.

“This is an isolated place where they can do these exchanges, where people aren’t going to notice… (where) their own citizens, and folks in the intelligence community might not notice,” Lair said.

An estimated 12,000 North Korean soldiers have been sent to Russia, according to Ukrainian officials and Western intelligence reports in January, which say around 4,000 of those troops have been killed or injured. Kyiv says it has captured at least two North Korean soldiers. Neither Moscow nor Pyongyang have confirmed the existence of North Korean troops on the front lines.

CNN has reached out to the Russian Ministry of Defense for comment.

North Korean troops have been deployed to Kursk since late October to repel Ukraine’s incursion in the southern Russian border region.

“The Russians seem to have been very careful to limit the exposure of the North Korean soldiers, moving them directly to military training facilities. The motive behind all the secrecy surrounding the North Koreans is uncertain, but moving some of them through Dunai would aid in that effort,” Lair wrote in his analysis.

Dunai port has previously been used to transport cargo between Russia and the North Korea since Pyongyang started aiding the invasion of Ukraine in 2023, according to the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies.

Satellite images taken in October show a cargo ship being loaded at Rajin port in North Korea, and the same ship docked two days later at Dunai in Russia.

An October 2023 report from the UK-based think tank The Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies (RUSI) said that “Russia has likely begun shipping North Korean munitions at scale” to the “inconspicuous naval facility” tucked away in Dunai.

“We spend a lot of time looking at North Korea in general, because of North Korea’s nuclear weapons program, their conventional weapons program, their missile programs… So, we’ve been monitoring the North Korea-Russia connection since it started, in part because we think that that relationship might be going both ways,” Lair said.

Alyona Getmanchuk, director of the New Europe Center think tank in Kyiv, told a forum in South Korea this week that North Korea is gaining valuable combat experience with its involvement in Ukraine.

“It’s not only about supplies of missiles, it’s about testing their missiles in real battlefield conditions,” Getmanchuk said during the forum at the Goethe Institute in Seoul.

She said North Korea has used that experience to upgrade missiles to make them more accurate.

Pyongyang’s ground troops are also getting better, Getmanchuk said.

“They came totally unprepared… Now they are learning very quickly,” adapting to their tactics to be effective in “modern, hi-tech warfare,” she added.

Lair said the Pyongyang-Moscow relationship has deepened since the invasion began. “Sending your own soldiers to fight in someone else’s conflict really suggests the strength of the connection,” he said.

There are indications that Russia and North Korea are no longer using the sea route to transport troops, according to the think tank. Meanwhile, South Korean intelligence has reported that Russian military planes are frequently flying between Vladivostok and Pyongyang.

At the UN Security Council meeting on Monday, the U.S. voted with Russia and China, while all five European countries on the Council – Great Britain, France, Slovenia, Denmark and Greece abstained.

In theory, the British and French have the right to veto a resolution, but they have not used it since 1989.

Resolutions in the UN Security Council are binding under international law.

The adopted document, entitled “The Path to Peace,’’ did not name Moscow as the aggressor in the war and does not call for a Russian withdrawal, merely a swift end to the war.

The British UN ambassador, Barbara Woodward, spoke out clearly against the resolution: “there can be no equivalence between Russia and Ukraine in how this Council refers to this war’’.

She said in a speech before the council that was also released as a statement.

The vote came on the third anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

“Today, we remember the millions of Ukrainians displaced, the tens of thousands of civilians killed, the lives destroyed by Russian President, Vladimir Putin’s imperial ambition,’’ Woodward said.

France’s UN ambassador, Nicolas de Rivière said peace and security was not possible if aggression is rewarded.

U.S. ambassador Dorothy Shea said the resolution was a first step.

“This resolution puts us on the path to peace.

“It is a first step, but a crucial one, one of which we should all be proud. Now we must use it to build a peaceful future for Ukraine, Russia and the international community,’’ she said.

Earlier on Monday, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution with support of European countries, but not the U.S…

It identified Moscow as the aggressor in the war and demanded Russian troops withdraw from Ukrainian territory.

Unlike the Security Council, resolutions in the General Assembly are not legally binding but a vote in the UN’s largest body was seen as a global test of sentiment.

Credit: CNN, dpa/NAN

Teacher sacked after 35 years of service for joking about ‘whacking’ kids if they flunked a test

Baiklautchmee Subrian took Gilbert Colvin Primary School (pictured) in Ilford, east London, to an employment tribunal after she was dismissed for making the comment to a small class of Year 6 pupils

An experienced primary school teacher was sacked after one of her pupils did not understand that a threat to ‘whack’ him round the head was a joke.

Baiklautchmee Subrian took Gilbert Colvin Primary School in Ilford, east London, to an employment tribunal after she was dismissed for making the comment to a small class of Year 6 pupils.

Whilst preparing the children for their maths SAT exam, she made the remark after one of the children asked her what would happen to them if they didn’t hold their papers in place during their tests.

Ms Subrian, who has been teaching for 35 years, was said to have replied she would ‘whack’ them and gestured with her hand.

The teacher argued that her comment ‘had been made in jest’ and almost all the children in the class had understood that it was not meant to be malicious.

But the hearing was told the pupil, who spoke English as a second language, felt threatened, upset and angry over the incident and reported it to another teacher.

The day after the comment was made, Ms Subrian was asked to meet with the head of the school and she was told that there would be an investigation.

A disciplinary hearing took place in July 2023 where Subrian argued that because the child who made the complaint had continued to attend her after-school club they were not really that upset.

But the teacher was sent a letter of dismissal later that month.

The school explained that even if she had ‘intended the comment as a joke’ to the student, because he did not have English as a first language he ‘could not be expected to understand that’.

It added the pupil had felt threatened by the teacher and the comment amounted to gross misconduct.

Ms Subrian criticised the investigation conducted by the school for ‘lacking integrity and said the punishment was too severe.

But judge Jack Feeny rejected her claim of unfair dismissal at the hearing in east London.

In his closing comments, the judge said: ‘I do not consider whether or not the comment was intended as a joke to be particularly important. It was plainly an inappropriate thing to say.

‘The accompanying hand gesture compounded matters, particularly where at least some of the children did not have English as a first language.

‘A teacher may get away with a comment in these circumstances if all children receive it as a light-hearted comment and laugh along. It is common ground that this was not what happened here. The risk of making such a joke is that if even only one child is upset by it, it must amount to a significant safeguarding issue.’

Between a Hearing Notice and a Summons: A crucial clarification on the controversy between Ordinary President and Senator Akpabio

By E. Monjok Agom

A recent controversy surrounding the Ordinary President, of the popular Human Rights Radio and Television, who had initiated a petition to the National Assembly, highlighted the importance of understanding the distinction between a hearing notice and a summons. The Ordinary President, not Godswill Akpabio, the Senate President, initiated the petition or hearing, and the subsequent invitation to attend the case was misconstrued as a summons instead of a hearing notice as a result of the title of the invitation.

THE MISUSE OF LEGAL TERMINOLOGY

The misuse of these legal terms led to allegations of victimization. However, it is essential to understand that a hearing notice is a formal document that informs a party of an upcoming hearing, providing essential details such as date, time, and location. On the other hand, a summons is a more formal and authoritative document that requires a party to appear in court, failing which a decision may be taken in default of appearance.

THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN A HEARING NOTICE AND A SUMMONS

The key differences between a hearing notice and a summons lie in their purpose, authority, and recipients. A hearing notice is typically used for routine matters, whereas a summons is issued to a defendant or respondent, requiring them to respond to a complaint or petition.

A hearing notice is usually issued to inform a party of an upcoming hearing, whereas a summons is used to “compel” a party to appear in court. The tone and language used in a summons are more formal and authoritative, emphasizing the importance of the party’s attendance.

THE CONTROVERSY SURROUNDING THE ORDINARY PRESIDENT’S PETITION

In the context of the Ordinary President’s petition to the National Assembly, the invitation to attend the case should have been titled a hearing notice, not a summons. As the initiator of the petition, the Ordinary President would not be considered a defendant or respondent, and therefore, a summons would be misplaced.

THE IMPORTANCE OF UNDERSTANDING LEGAL TERMINOLOGY

The misuse of these terms of art highlights the importance of understanding legal terminology to avoid unnecessary controversy and ensure fair proceedings. The correct use of legal terms is crucial in maintaining the integrity of the legal system. By recognizing the distinction between a hearing notice and a summons, we can prevent misconceptions and ensure that justice is served.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the controversy surrounding the Ordinary President’s petition to the National Assembly serves as a reminder of the importance of understanding the distinction between a hearing notice and a summons. By recognizing the correct use of these legal terms, we can prevent misconceptions and ensure that justice is served. As we strive to maintain the integrity of our legal system, it is essential that we prioritize clarity and precision in our use of legal terminology. This is even more compelling for a document emanating from the National Assembly of Nigeria.

E. Monjok Agom

Okutepa says lawyers who claim Court of Appeal reinstated sacked Osun APC LG Chairmen are making false claims

A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Jubril Okutepa, has challenged any lawyer to produce evidence from the Court of Appeal judgment that reinstated the sacked local government chairmen in Osun State.

Speaking on Arise TV’s News Night on Tuesday, Okutepa insisted that there was no court order mandating the reinstatement of the former council bosses, contrary to claims by the All Progressives Congress (APC).

He maintained that politicians were misinterpreting the judgment for their own interests, stressing that no legal backing exists for their return to office.

Chief Okutepa explained that the Federal High Court had nullified the council election conducted by the administration of former Governor Gboyega Oyetola, declaring it illegal and of no effect.

According to him, when the APC and APM challenged the ruling, the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal for lack of diligent prosecution.

By implication, he argued, the judgment of the Federal High Court remains valid, and there was never an order for the sacked chairmen to be reinstated.

According to the Senior Advocate of Nigeria, the Osogbo High Court’s directive for the Osun State Independent Electoral Commission (OSSIEC) to conduct fresh local government elections was in line with a Supreme Court ruling that outlawed caretaker committees at the local government level.

He dismissed allegations that Governor Ademola Adeleke’s administration cherry-picked court judgments, asserting that the state government merely followed constitutional provisions that mandate democratically elected councils.

Urging politicians to abide by the rule of law, Okutepa warned against misrepresenting court rulings for political gains.

“No one can wake up and choose not to respect a court judgment. Until set aside , a court order remains valid and binding,” he said.

He called on legal practitioners and the public to read the court’s decision thoroughly before making assertions, challenging anyone to point out where the reinstatement of the sacked chairmen was ordered.

bo High Court’s directive for the Osun State Independent Electoral Commission (OSSIEC) to conduct fresh local government elections was in line with a Supreme Court ruling that outlawed caretaker committees at the local government level.

He dismissed allegations that Governor Ademola Adeleke’s administration cherry-picked court judgments, asserting that the state government merely followed constitutional provisions that mandate democratically elected councils.

Urging politicians to abide by the rule of law, Okutepa warned against misrepresenting court rulings for political gains.

“No one can wake up and choose not to respect a court judgment. Until set aside, a court order remains valid and binding,” he said.

He called on legal practitioners and the public to read the court’s decision thoroughly before making assertions, challenging anyone to point out where the reinstatement of the sacked chairmen was ordered.

TIPS