Home Blog Page 319

Breaking!!! FCTA takes over PDP secretariat land, 4,793 others revoked over non-payment of ground rent

The Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) will, from Monday next week, begin to take possession of the 4,794 properties revoked over non-payment of Ground Rent, for between 10 and 43 years.

LEADERSHIP reports that the land on which the permanent headquarters of the major opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) is located in Abuja is one of the affected lands, as it was earlier revoked in March over non-payment of ground rent for many years.

This was made known during a press briefing on Friday by the FCT Minister’s Senior Special Assistant on Public Communications and Social Media, Lere Olayinka; Director of Land Administration, Chijioke Nwankwoeze, and Director, Department of Development Control, Mukhtar Galadima.

They said, “Ownership of the revoked 4,794 properties in the Central Area, Garki I and II, Wuse I and II, Asokoro, Maitama and Guzape districts, had already reverted to the FCTA, and as from Monday, next week, the government will begin to exercise its rights of ownership on the affected landed properties.

“As usual, this will be done without consideration as to ownership of the affected landed properties. It will be purely in line with extant laws and regulations guiding the process.”

The Director of Development Control explained that affected properties will be sealed up and access to them restricted as from Monday. He said the FCTA will decide what to do with the affected properties in due course.

On the claim that some people went to court, the Director of Lands stated that there was no court decision on the revocation, and as such, the FCTA was not restricted in the discharge of its lawful functions on the affected properties.

Also, Nwankwoeze also disclosed that the FCTA was already compiling records of compliance and non-compliance of title holders that were in default of payment of Ground Rent for between one and 10 years, who were given a grace of 21 Days to pay up.

He said the government will act accordingly as soon as the records are fully compiled and analysed.

“Recall that on March 18, 2025, we informed you of the revocation of 4,794 land titles in the Central Area, Garki I and II, Wuse I and II, Asokoro, Maitama and Guzape districts.

“These 4,794 properties were among the total of 8,375 land titles on which Ground Rent was not paid from one year to 43 years.

“We did say then that consequent upon the revocation of these titles, ownership of the affected properties have reverted to the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA).

“As from Monday, May 26, 2025, the FCTA will begin to take possession of the affected properties, using relevant agencies of government.

“As usual, this will be done without consideration as to ownership of the affected properties. It will be purely in line with extant laws and regulations guiding the process.

“Recall too that a grace of 21 Days was given to title holders that were in default of payment of Ground Rent for between one and ten years, to pay up or have their land tittles revoked.

“Relevant agencies of the FCTA are already compiling records of compliance and non-compliance with this directive, with a view to acting accordingly.

“It is important to state that payment of Ground Rent on landed properties in the FCT is founded on extant legislation. It is clearly stipulated in the terms and conditions of grant of Right of Occupancy, and it is due for payment on the first day of January, each year, without demand,” they explained.

In March, this year, list of land titles in default of payment of Ground Rent was compiled in the 10 oldest districts of Phase 1 of the Federal Capital City (FCC), namely; Central Area District (Cadastral Zone A00), Garki I (Cadastral Zone A01), Wuse I (Cadastral Zone A02), Garki II (Cadastral Zone A03), Asokoro (Cadastral Zone A04), Maitama (Cadastral Zone A05), Maitama (Cadastral Zone A06), Wuse II (Cadastral Zone A07), Wuse II (Cadastral Zone A08) and Guzape (Cadastral Zone A09).

In the listed districts, a total of 4,794 land titles were in default of ground rent payment for 10 years and above. As of then, a total of N6,967,980,119 was being owed as Ground Rent by 8,375 property owners.

FCTA said this contravenes the terms and conditions of the grant of the Rights of Occupancy, in line with the provisions of Section 28, Subsections 5(a) and (b) of the Land Use Act.

Consequently, the titles of the properties in default were revoked in March 2025.

Leadership

AI division set up in INEC to enhance electoral process

Ahead of the 2027 general elections, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has announced the creation of a new Artificial Intelligence Division under its Information and Communication Technology Department.

The announcement was made in a statement issued by the National Commissioner and Chairman of the Information and Voter Education Committee, Sam Olumekun.

According to the statement, the move was approved during the commission’s regular weekly meeting held on Thursday in Abuja.

The statement noted that the establishment of the AI Division followed INEC’s participation in a series of continental conferences focused on the impact of AI on elections.

The commission noted the dual nature of AI, acknowledging both the threats it poses, such as the spread of misinformation and content manipulation and the opportunities it offers in areas such as data-driven decision-making, risk management, and service automation.

“The commission held its regular weekly meeting today, Thursday, 22nd May 2025. Among other issues, the meeting considered the increasing relevance of Artificial Intelligence to elections and electoral activities in Nigeria and across the world.

“Recently, the commission attended several conferences with colleagues around the continent on the impact of AI on elections.

“These interactions were not only motivated by the concern over the use of AI to spread fake news or manipulate content online but also to utilise its benefits for data-driven decision-making, risk detection and mitigation, deepening voter services automation and geo-spatial intelligence in support of logistic optimisation for better material distribution and polling unit allocation,” the statement read in part.

INEC said the new division will help harness AI’s potential to improve logistical planning, material distribution, and polling unit allocation through geo-spatial intelligence. It also aims to enhance the integrity and efficiency of elections by utilising predictive analytics and intelligent automation.

According to the commission, centralising AI governance will allow for better coordination of technological resources and contribute to a more credible and transparent electoral process.

“Consequently, the commission approved the creation of an Artificial Intelligence Division under the ICT Department to continue to harness the positive aspects of AI and mitigate its negative impact on elections.

“The division will enable the commission to better coordinate and maximise existing technology investments through centralised AI governance. It will also enhance decision-making through data-driven insights, risk management and voter engagement. Furthermore, it will strengthen electoral credibility through predictive analytics, automation and intelligent safeguards.

“This initiative puts the commission in the forefront of institutionalising AI capabilities within our ICT infrastructure. It is also an important step in our ongoing reform of the electoral process in areas that only require administrative action by the commission,” the statement added.

Open Letter to Federal Government: Thank you for prosecution of Senator Natasha. We pray that she goes to prison and sees firsthand the real meaning of sexual harassment (Please kindly add more witnesses apart from the White Lion and the Uncommon Transformer)

By Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja

Dear Federal Government,

On behalf of the appreciative citizens of Nigeria, we say thank you for filing a prosecution against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan.

We were so excited today, 22nd May 2025, when we read about it on one of the most reliable online newspapers, Cable newspaper: https://www.thecable.ng/just-in-akpabio-yahaya-bello-to-testify-as-fg-files-criminal-charge-against-natasha-akpoti/

We are so very happy about this development, which we wish should have happened earlier.

Had it been it happened earlier, Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan would not have had the opportunity to be granting all those interviews and social media appearances such as that her stupid SATIRICAL LETTER OF APOLOGY!!!

Just because someone allegedly held her hands to show her round his house, she is alleging sexual harassment!!!

We pray that she is convicted and sent to prison (correctional centre) where she would witness first-hand the real meaning of sexual harassment from her fellow inmates!!!

Just because they warned her that the floor/hallowed chambers of the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is not a place for her to be “pan-caking her face” and wearing all those “transparent dresses”, she took offence!!!

As much as we are happy with the prosecution of Senator Natasha, we are not happy that you have decided to call only two witnesses, namely the WHITE LION and the UNCOMMON TRANSFORMER ELEPHANT.

The problem that we envisage is that would White Lion have the time to attend since he is already booked by the EFCC for court appearances in another federal court?

Also, the UNCOMMON TRANSFORMER has a very busy schedule during all the plenary and Constituency project visits, would he be able to testify when invited?

The jungle is not made up of only these two animals. What about the Senator that said that: Senator Natasha is not even pretty enough?

He ought to come and give testimony since he happens to know a lot more about her and the number of husbands and her matrimonial affairs than even her husband!!!

What about the two Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SAN) who were recently cited for Contempt of Court by the Federal High Court Abuja?

One of them has video evidence that he obtained from FACEBOOK about how Senator Natasha is guilty of attempting to bribe a USA-based Nigerian to fabricate evidence to support her false allegations against the UNCOMMON TRANSFORMER!!!

The other SAN held a press conference wherein he invited her to come and submit evidence to substantiate her allegations, even though the proper forum is a court of law!!!

We are also surprised and not pleased that you have only charged her with minimal offences under the Penal Code.

We were expecting more charges under the popular Section 24 of the Cybercrimes Act, 2024 (as amended)!!!

What about the offence of disturbing public peace and vagrancy, considering how she has been gallivanting from Nigeria to the United States of America (USA) and all over to grant interviews!!!

Why didn’t you add a charge for seizure of her international passport (s)? so that she would not run away, because we hear that she has travelled again!!!

More importantly, what about that her lawyer that calls himself a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) that had the audacity to write a letter dated 15th May 2025. The said letter was addressed to the Hon. Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) asking the AGF to prosecute a whole number 3!!!

Why was his name not added to the list of accused persons?

Well let us not complain too much, we are happy that you even at long last files this lawsuit against this woman that has been disturbing the fragile peace of Nigeria ever since.

Once again, on behalf of appreciative Nigerians, we say well done, you are doing great!!!

Yours faithfully,
Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja,
22nd May 2025.

The views expressed by contributors are strictly personal and not of Law & Society Magazine.

Nigeria’s Untapped Security Asset, By Emmanuel Onwubiko

Insecurity in Nigeria has evolved into a hydra-headed monster—terrorism, insurgency, banditry, herdsmen violence, piracy, armed robbery, secessionist agitations, and inter-communal clashes continue to stretch the limits of our security forces and national cohesion. These multidimensional threats, aggravated by economic desperation and institutional decay, have created one of the most volatile security environments in sub-Saharan Africa.

While the Nigerian state continues to invest heavily in kinetic approaches—military operations, intelligence frameworks, hardware acquisition—an equally potent, albeit underutilized, force exists in the realm of media and communication. More specifically, within the often-overlooked substructure of that force lies the unique and transformative potential of women journalists.

These women, armed not with rifles but with recorders, pens, cameras, and an unrelenting commitment to truth, are gradually redefining what it means to safeguard the nation. Their role in national security, though subtle and largely unheralded, is vital to any honest conversation about curbing insecurity in Nigeria.

Too often, national security discourse omits media actors except when discussing sensationalism or misinformation. Yet, credible journalism is a stabilizing agent. It educates the public, provides early warning signs, holds government accountable, and amplifies the voices of communities on the frontlines of violence. In this domain, women journalists possess critical, distinctive tools—access, empathy, contextual insight, and resilience—that allow them to play an indispensable role in the architecture of peacebuilding and national security. They are not merely reporters; they are field-based analysts, truth-bearers, and community bridges whose work often goes unacknowledged by the state, the media industry, and the public at large.

From the creeks of the Niger Delta to the forests of Zamfara, from the IDP camps in Maiduguri to the barricaded towns in the South-East, women journalists have defied systemic and physical obstacles to tell stories that matter. In many rural or patriarchal communities, especially during crises, women survivors are more willing to speak with female reporters—leading to deeply insightful and humane narratives that would otherwise be inaccessible. These narratives are not just emotional appeals; they form the evidence base for humanitarian responses, psychosocial interventions, and policy redirection.

Take, for instance, the aftermath of the 2014 abduction of over 270 schoolgirls in Chibok, Borno State, by Boko Haram. While male journalists provided the initial news flash and political commentary, it was female correspondents, often freelancers or community-based radio journalists, who sustained attention on the issue through interviews with mothers, schoolteachers, clergy, and the traumatized returnees. Their reportage humanized a tragedy that might have been buried in the next cycle of breaking news. It also sparked international outrage and diplomatic interventions. It is difficult to overstate the long-term impact of this form of journalism on both policy response and national awareness.

Moreover, women journalists have made significant strides in investigative reporting—another crucial component of national security. Corruption within security agencies, sexual abuse in IDP camps, diversion of humanitarian aid, and human trafficking under the guise of interstate migration have all been exposed in reports led or co-authored by women. These revelations do more than make headlines. They prompt legislative oversight, civil society mobilization, and, occasionally, criminal prosecution. Without these interventions, impunity would flourish, and insecurity would deepen.

Globally, research has demonstrated that women bring a different lens to conflict reporting and security analysis. A UNESCO study titled “Gender Sensitive Indicators for Media” affirms that the inclusion of women in editorial and field operations leads to more balanced, inclusive, and socially responsive reporting. Conflict affects women and children disproportionately, yet narratives around national security are still overwhelmingly militarized and male-centered. Women journalists bridge this gap, reporting from IDP camps, displacement zones, hospitals, and community dialogues—spaces often deemed “less newsworthy” by traditional editorial structures but vital for understanding the full spectrum of security challenges.

In the North-East, for instance, radio journalism remains one of the most influential forms of media engagement, particularly among rural populations. Female journalists anchoring community peace programs in Hausa and Kanuri have been at the forefront of countering extremist narratives. Their programs promote tolerance, inter-ethnic dialogue, girls’ education, and reintegration of ex-combatants. These are not soft topics—they are fundamental to deradicalization and the stabilization of post-conflict communities. Yet, these efforts often operate with minimal institutional support or security coverage.

Unfortunately, the professional environment for women journalists in Nigeria is still riddled with challenges. A 2020 study by the International Federation of Journalists revealed that over 65% of female journalists in Nigeria have experienced some form of harassment—physical, verbal, or sexual—during their careers. This hostile atmosphere deters many from accepting high-risk assignments or from pursuing investigative journalism in security-related beats. Others face cultural and institutional biases that limit their career advancement, reduce their visibility, and undermine their credibility. Insecurity affects everyone, but women journalists navigate it with the additional burden of gendered threats.

One cannot overemphasize the urgency of reform. Media organizations must adopt gender-responsive safety protocols, offer targeted security training, and ensure equitable assignment of investigative roles. Government stakeholders, including the Ministry of Information and the security agencies, must treat women journalists not as peripheral observers but as critical stakeholders in information dissemination and trust-building. At a time when fake news, propaganda, and online radicalization are escalating, credible female voices in journalism can serve as powerful counterweights to divisive narratives.

The Nigeria Association of Women Journalists (NAWOJ) has continued to advocate for the empowerment and protection of its members. With initiatives focused on capacity building, mentorship, and policy engagement, NAWOJ has emerged as a frontline defender of media professionalism and gender equity. Its upcoming Zonal Conference scheduled for May 22, 2025, themed “Curbing Insecurity: The Role of Women Journalists in National Security,” is a testament to the growing recognition of women journalists as integral to the nation’s security discourse. But seminars and communiqués are not enough. What is needed now is structural commitment—by newsrooms, by regulatory bodies, and by the Nigerian state—to back words with action.

This commitment must also include access. Too often, security briefings are exclusionary, heavily skewed toward state media and male correspondents. Female journalists, especially those from community media or regional outlets, are denied information access, travel passes, or even physical security support. This marginalization undermines the quality of our national reportage and limits public understanding of critical issues. It is imperative that security agencies institutionalize gender inclusion in their public affairs and media engagement strategies. When women are at the table, the questions change, the focus expands, and the solutions diversify.

Equally important is the need to integrate women journalists into national security planning—not merely as mouthpieces but as active participants. Their field knowledge, community linkages, and communication skills make them valuable assets for early warning systems, peace education, and crisis response. In countries like Kenya and Colombia, women journalists have been formally engaged in community policing and reconciliation frameworks, with positive results. Nigeria must learn from these examples and localize them for its peculiar challenges.

Additionally, donor agencies, NGOs, and multilateral institutions working on governance and peacebuilding must earmark specific grants and fellowships for women in security journalism. The current funding landscape is heavily skewed toward male-dominated outlets and international correspondents. By supporting female reporters—particularly in underserved regions—these institutions can help democratize information access and strengthen the feedback loop between citizens and the state.

Ultimately, it must be acknowledged that journalism is not merely a profession in Nigeria; it is a vocation of public service, often carried out at great personal risk. For women journalists, this risk is compounded by entrenched patriarchy, workplace discrimination, and societal stigma. And yet, they continue to show up, report, write, speak, and document. They deserve not only our gratitude but our protection, our investment, and our recognition as defenders of truth and peace.

If Nigeria is to win the war against insecurity, it must stop viewing security as the exclusive domain of men in uniform and begin to adopt a whole-of-society approach. In this paradigm, women journalists are not on the periphery—they are at the heart of the solution. By ensuring that their voices are heard, their rights are protected, and their contributions are institutionalized, Nigeria can take a significant step toward building a more informed, inclusive, and secure nation.

As insecurity continues to cast its long shadow over the country, the question is not whether women journalists have a role in national security—they do. The question is whether Nigeria is ready to institutionalize and support that role in meaningful, sustainable ways. If the answer is yes, then we must act with urgency and intentionality. The future of our security may depend on it.

ONWUBIKO is the founder of the HUMAN RIGHTS WRITERS ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA and was NATIONAL COMMISSIONER OF THE NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION OF NIGERIA.

The views expressed by contributors are strictly personal and not of Law & Society Magazine.

Open Letter to the Hon. Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) and the ICPC: Budget padding is a crime and can be prosecuted under both Section 58 of the Public Procurement Act, 2007 and Section 19 of the ICPC Act, 2000, respectively

By Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja

Dear Hon. Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Sir,

By way of re-introduction, my name is Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja, I am a lawyer qualified in the year 2004.

I write in my capacity as the Secretary of the Association of Legislative Drafting and Advocacy Practitioners-ALDRAP. We are a professional Association of Legislative lawyers who are committed to ensuring compliance with legislation by public office holders. We apply public interest litigation and continuing legal education programmes as our methods to ensure compliance.

For example, last year, our Association-ALDRAP filed a lawsuit at the National Industrial Court of Nigeria, Abuja Division, to prevent the National Assembly and its Principal Officials from enacting a Bill to increase the age of retirement of the immediate past Clerk to the National Assembly from 60 to 65 years of age. Due to our litigation, the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria refused to assent to the said Bill.

You can confirm my credentials from the former Attorney-General of Oyo State, the same learned Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) that initially introduced me to your good self.

You can also confirm from the Chairman of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Related Offences Commission (ICPC), who happens to be my former classmate at the Nigerian Law School Class of 2004 (he is copied in this letter).

Before I begin, let me disclose and declare that I have no personal interests in this matter.

To the contrary it is overriding public interest that drives this advocacy.

Since October 2024, I have been engaged as an European Union funded legal consultant for legislative drafting training lawyers of the Office of Parliamentary Counsel and the Law Reform Commission of the Kingdom of Lesotho. So I stand to gain no personal benefits.

On behalf of the Association of Legislative Drafting and Advocacy Practitioners- ALDRAP, I write to respectfully inform you to perform your duty to prosecute the perpetrators of the budget padding of ₦6.9 trillion into the 2025 budget. The said duty is imposed upon your good self under Section 58 of the Public Procurement Act, 2007 (amended in 2023).

I also write to respectfully request the Chairman of the ICPC to prosecute the perpetrators of the same budget padding, which is a violation of Section 19 of the ICPC Act, 2000.

Respectfully, AGF, Sir, please kindly find time to read through the Report that contains a list of the 11,112 items that were inserted into the said 2025 which amounts to a total of ₦6.93trillion. This Report is available on the website of BudgIT: https://budgit.org/post_publications/2025-budget-insertions-by-the-national-assembly/

Although budget padding which is the illegal insertion of amounts into the annual budget or Appropriation legislation is not defined inside any legislation.

Both the intentions and actions of the officials that perpetuate budget padding constitutes a crime contrary to Section 19 of the ICPC Act, 2000 and Section 58 of the Public Procurement Act, 2007 which empowers the occupant of the Office of the AGF to prosecute offenders.

Respectfully, AGF Sir, Sections 12 and 86 of the Public Procurement Act was recently amended in the year 2023 to provide for a Register of Suppliers as well as digitalisation of all public procurement and linking it to the sustainable development goals of Nigeria, therefore, the act of budget padding is itself constitutes a violation of these amended provisions!!!

By looking at the said BudgIT Report on the items that were padded into the 2025 budget, the names of the officials who were responsible can be identified.

To conclude, we respectfully request your reference to the annual budget law of Brazil, from which we can learn lessons (considering that the said annual budget law of Brazil clearly identifies the author of the annual budget law so that such an official can be held responsible for any insertion or budget padding). It is available online at: https://www.congressonacional.leg.br/materias/pesquisa/-/materia/159659

We can also provide your good self the contact details of Prof. Luis Fernando Machado, a professor of law and official of the Legislative Institute of Brazil, who has written a seminal paper on how Nigeria can avoid the dangers of budget padding in the process of enactment of the annual budget law. His paper is published in the 2024 edition of the International Journal of Legislative Drafting and Law Reform. Available online at the website of the Canadian Legal Information Institute (CANLii).

TAKE NOTICE THAT IN THE EVENT THAT YOU FAIL OR REFUSE TO TAKE THE NECESSARY ACTION, WE SHALL INITIATE A LAWSUIT FOR AN ORDER OF MANDAMUS TO COMPEL YOUR COMPLIANCE.

Yours faithfully,
Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja,
22nd May 2025.

cc: Hon. Chairman, ICPC, Abuja, FCT.

Businessman accidentally shot by DSS gets N20m compensation, free medicare 

The Department of State Services (DSS) has invited the Sokoto businessman who was accidentally shot during an operation to its hospital in Abuja.

This is in fulfilment of a promise to give free medical services to the victim.

In mid-March this year, the DSS Director-General, Mr. Tosin Ajayi, approved the payment of ₦10 million damages awarded by a court to the businessman six years earlier. To compensate for time lost, the DG handed the businessman an additional ₦10 million, bringing the total sum to ₦20 million.

At the time, Mr. Ajayi directed the DSS hospital to officially integrate the businessman into the Services’  medical care system, which would enable him to enjoy free medical services anytime he so desired.

A security source said the businessman arrived in the hospital “a few days ago, and has been undergoing free medical tests and treatment from the hospital’s best doctors.”

He said, “True to the DG’s directive, the man has been in the VIP ward, which, of course, is fully air-conditioned. They have been running a series of checks and giving him round-the-clock medical attention in order to make him regain full control of his limbs. I even understand the DG asked that he be fed for free.”

In 2016, during a pre-dawn operation to arrest a suspected gunrunner in Jos, Plateau State, DSS operatives mistakenly shot and injured the businessman who incidentally bears the same name as the suspected gunrunner. The gunrunner was eventually arrested.

Two years after the shooting, in 2018, the businessman, through his lawyer, Idris Akibu, approached a Federal High Court in Bauchi. Delivering judgment on the matter with suit number FHC/J/CS/18/2018, the court, presided over by Justice Muhammed Shittu Abubakar, ordered the DSS to pay ₦10 million in damages to the injured businessman.

“This is the third DG since this unfortunate case of mistaken identity happened.  We were very happy when our new DG directed that we pay the money. He even added another ₦10 million to the victim’s money. It goes to show that, not only can security agencies be law-abiding, we can also be full of the milk of human kindness,” the source declared.

Man who killed wife, her kids 36 years ago in the US executed by lethal injection

A man sentenced to death 36 years ago for the murder of his wife and her two sons was executed in Tennessee on Thursday, according to the state’s Department of Corrections.

Oscar Smith, 75, was the third death row inmate to be executed in the United States this week, all of which were carried out by lethal injection.

Smith was pronounced dead at 10:47 am local time (1547 GMT) at the Riverbend Maximum Security Institution in Nashville, Tennessee.

He was convicted of fatally shooting and stabbing his estranged wife, Judy Smith, and her two sons, Chad and Jason Burnett, in 1989.

Mike Robirds and Terri Osborne, Judy’s siblings, said in a statement that the pain of losing their sister and nephews “is something we will continue to carry.”

“Through our heartbreak, we are reminded of the devastating consequences of domestic violence,” the statement said.

“This tragedy is not only a personal loss — it is part of a much larger issue that affects countless families across our society.”

There have been 19 executions in the United States this year: 15 by lethal injection, two by firing squad and two using nitrogen gas.

The death penalty has been abolished in 23 of the 50 US states, while three others — California, Oregon and Pennsylvania — have moratoriums in place.

AFP

Open letter to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP): The prosecution of Senator Natasha as an example of fiddling while Rome (Nigeria) burns with over 800 terrorism suspects not prosecuted since 2021 (A tribute to Prof. Nasiru Tijani)

By Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja

Dear Director of Public Prosecutions of the Federation,

My name is Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja, I am a lawyer that qualified in the year 2004.

You can ask your colleague, the Director of Legal Drafting, Federal Ministry of Justice with whom we have participated in different legislative drafting workshops!!!

Please kindly permit me to open this letter by paying tribute to Prof. Nasiru Tijani.

Any lawyer who attended the Nigerian Law School, Abuja campus in the year 2003, cannot forget Prof. Nasiru Tijani. He was the lecturer of the Criminal Litigation course. He later served as the Deputy Director-General of the Nigerian Law School, Lagos campus.

He was a genius when it came (and comes) to the Law of Criminal Litigation. He could deliver his lectures without looking at any notes and he would answer all manner of questions thrown at him by students by reference to a long line of statutes and judgments of courts of law!!!

It was during one of his lectures that I learned that although Section 174 (and Section 211) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 confers upon the Attorney-General of the Federation (and the Attorney-General of a State, and by extension the DPP), the said power and discretion to initiate and terminate prosecutions, is not absolute, it comes with a caveat!!!

“An Attorney-General is therefore domino litis (“master of the suit” or “owner of the case”) as regards prosecution of all criminal matters before any court other than a Court Martial, see Dr Adekanya vs FRN 2005 All FWLR (Pt 252) 514 at 533.”

However, this power and discretion of the AGF (and by extension the DPP) to initiate and terminate prosecutions must be exercised for the benefit of overriding public interests!!!

Therefore, the question arises: the recent decision of the DPP of the Federation to prosecute Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, is it based on overriding public interests?

How can a matter that affects only two Nigerian citizens (Akpabio and Yahaya Bello) be deemed to be of overriding public importance?

Worst case scenario, could not the AGF and the DPP have granted a FIAT TO both Akpabio and Yahaya Bello to bring charges against Senator Natasha (at their own costs) instead of expending scarce resources of the Federal Government of Nigeria?

Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and her lawyer, Dr. Ehiogie West-Idahosa, SAN, by letters dated 15th May 2025 and addressed to the AGF also complained of criminal defamation and threat to life by Akpabio and others. how come the DPP did not file prosecution against those against whom Senator Natasha complained?

An example of an instance wherein the exercise of the power to initiate and discontinue prosecution came under public scrutiny especially when it is perceived to have been exercised injudiciously is the case of THE STATE vs DEEPAK KHILANI & SUSHIL CHANDRA before Hon. Justice Atinuke Ipaye (SUIT NO. ID/1544c/2015) of the Lagos State High Court. Details can be read online at https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vanguardngr.com/2017/10/nolle-prosequi-whose-interest/amp/

*How can the DPP of the Federation justify the decision to utilise the scarce resources (time and money ) of the federal government of Nigeria to call five witnesses in a case that borders on the allegations of injury to the reputation of two private citizens (Akpabio and Yahaya Bello)?

For example, Dr. Sandra Duru is listed by the DPP as one of the prosecution witnesses and considering that she is based in the United States of America (USA) more than ₦5,000,000 would be spent to secure her attendance at the trial.

In contrast, it is on record that the office of the AGF and the DPP has delayed the prosecution for terrorism of over 800 Boko Haram suspects on the grounds that it lacks funds to finance their prosecution, which commenced in the year 2017.

Using the excuse of lack of adequate funds, the AGF and the DPP of the Federation are reported to have appealed to the help of the Legal Aid Council of Nigeria to provide free legal services for the said 800 Boko Haram suspects who are being charged with terrorism.

A recent report by the Human Rights Watch states as follows:

“Nigeria’s prosecution of suspected Boko Haram members has been characterized by serious legal shortcomings, and the authorities are failing to prioritize prosecution of those most responsible for the group’s atrocities, Human Rights Watch said today.

In October 2017, authorities began trials of Boko Haram suspects, some of whom have been detained since the conflict began in 2009.”

Till today, the office of the AGF and the DPP have not yet concluded the said prosecution even though on the website of the Federal Ministry of Justice, it was reported in the year 2021 that the Office of the AGF and the DPP would”leave no stone unturned” in prompt prosecution of the said 800 Boko Haram suspects and their sponsors. See: https://justice.gov.ng/prosecution-of-boko-haram-sponsorsno-stone-will-be-left-unturned-fg/

“In May 2021 officials declared that the federal government was preparing 800 suspects linked to the terrorist group for prosecution, but Malami gave the fresh assurance in late January while receiving the Nigerian Ambassador to the Netherlands.”

The failure of the Office of the AGF and the DPP to fulfill this promise (while vigorously pursuing the less important prosecution of Senator Natasha) is a clear example of fiddling while Rome (or more appropriately) Nigeria burns with more important problem of terrorism for which Nigeria is now ranked 6th in the global index of terrorism!!!

“Nigeria has faced violent insurgencies for decades, ranking 6th on the 2025 Global Terrorism Index and accounting for 6% of global terrorism deaths in 2023. Since 2007, over 11,000 people have been killed, with millions more displaced. These insurgencies, especially in the North-East, North-Central and North-West, have severely impacted Nigeria’s local, state, and national socioeconomic fabric.

In Nigeria, key drivers of violent extremism include limited trust in the government, security forces and the justice system, limited socio-economic opportunities and religious conflicts. GCERF began investing in the country in 2016 and till date USD 11.75 million has been invested to address these drivers of violent extremism.” See the website: https://www.gcerf.org/nigeria/

In conclusion, Prof. Nasiru Tijani recently published an article (Tijani, N. (2023) The Effective Prosecution of the Crime of Terrorism and Terrorism Related Offences in Nigeria: Challenges and Prospects. Beijing Law Review, 14, 300-323) in which he pinpoints this problem. The article is available online at: https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=123865

In his examination of the power of the AGF (and by extension the DPP) to prosecute under the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022, he stated as follows:

“The Attorney General of the Federation is now designated as both the prosecuting agency and the prosecuting authority (sections 3 (1) (c) and 74 of Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022). However, the Act does not provide for the procedure for trial and prosecution of terrorism offences. Hence recourse will be had to extant criminal procedural laws (section 2 (1) Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015 )

This brings to the fore the points made by (Chukwuemerie, 2006) as to dual or double criminality.

This result is that in the exercise of prosecutorial discretion, other considerations will come into play. The prosecutor may decide to charge a pipeline vandal under the Terrorism Act rather than the Miscellaneous Offences Act or a kidnapper under the Act rather than the Criminal Code Act or Penal Code Act,13 Criminal Law or the Anti-kidnapping Law.

Prosecutorial discretion could be coloured by political considerations. While a suspect in the ruling party may be arraigned for pipeline vandalism or acts likely to cause breach of the peace or murder or culpable homicide punishable with death under the extant criminal legislation, the suspect from the opposition party will be charged under the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act.

There is need to curb this wrong use of the prosecutorial discretion to avoid political victimization especially in developing countries like Nigeria.”

I hope and pray that your mind and conscience would be moved by the contents of this letter.

Yours faithfully,
Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja,
23rd May 2025.

The views expressed by contributors are strictly personal and not of Law & Society Magazine.

FG files criminal charges against Natasha Akpoti, Akpabio, Yahaya Bello to testify

The federal government has filed an action against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, who represents Kogi Central at Nigeria’s senate, over alleged defamatory remarks made on live television.

The suit marked CR/297/25 and filed before a federal capital territory high court on May 16, 2025, has Akpoti-Uduaghan as the sole defendant.

The government accused the senator of “making imputation knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm a person’s reputation”, citing section 391 of the Penal Code, cap 89, Laws of the Federation, 1990. The offence is punishable under section 392 of the same law.

The list of witnesses obtained by TheCable shows that Godswill Akpabio, Senate president, and Yahaya Bello, former governor of Kogi state, will testify during the trial.


Although full details of the charges are yet to be seen, count one accuses Akpoti-Uduaghan of making defamatory allegations during a live broadcast on Channels Television’s Politics Today, on April 3, 2025.

Other witnesses listed to testify in the suit include Asuquo Ekpenyong, a senator; Sandra Duru; Maya Iliya, an investigating police officer; and Abdulhafiz Garba, an investigating police officer.

Akpabio and Bello are said to be the nominal complainants.

Akpoti-Uduaghan was suspended from the Senate on March 6 for “gross misconduct” following her seating arrangement altercation with Akpabio.

The lawmaker said she believed her suspension was illegal, unjust and a way of silencing her.

She also rejected the Senate’s position that she was not suspended over the sexual harassment claim.

Over the weeks that have followed, the Kogi senator has made several allegations and submitted petitions against the senate president.

In April, Akpabio petitioned Kayode Egbetokun, the inspector-general of police, over the assassination allegation levelled against him by Akpoti-Uduaghan

He demanded an immediate investigation and prosecution of Akpoti-Uduaghan under relevant laws for “criminal defamation, incitement, false accusation, and conduct likely to cause a breach of peace”.

Bello had also petitioned the IGP over claims made by the Kogi senator, alleging that the former governor initiated and funded her recall process.

She had accused Bello of acting on Akpabio’s instruction to orchestrate her assassination outside Abuja, in a manner that would appear as a mob or local attack.

President Tinubu’s impeachable offences cannot be handled by a weak National Assembly

By Dr Vincent Adedara

Under the Nigerian Constitution, the sole ground for impeaching the President is “gross misconduct”. This is defined as a “grave violation or breach of the provisions of the Constitution or a misconduct of such nature as amounts in the opinion of the National Assembly to gross misconduct,” according to section 143(11) of the Constitution.
This is the only stated cause for impeachment in the Nigerian Constitution.

Section 143(11) defines it broadly as a grave constitutional violation or a misconduct deemed “gross” by the National Assembly.

The National Assembly has the power to initiate the impeachment process based on allegations of gross misconduct. The present National Assembly can never impeach President Tinubu but will rather see if they can give him a third term if possible.

The President has committed an impeachable offence by setting a dangerous precedent by going further to allow an unelected and unconstitutional sole Administrator to prepare the state budget and facilitate the passage of the same by the House of Representative.

Sole Administrator appointment in the Rivers State is unconstitutional in all ramifications.it would have been better to terminate the emergency rule in the state and reinstate Gov. Fubara and others, to allow him to prepare the state budget which will be passed to law by the state House of Assembly.

There is no justification for state of emergency in Rivers state and if there is any, then the rest of the states in Nigeria are supposed to be under emergency rule by reasons of kidnapping, terrorism, banditry, insurgency, arm robbery and other forms of insecurities in Nigeria, especially in the North East and North West. Some Local governments are under the control of terrorists but the states with such local governments are not fit for emergency rule, except the oil-rich state. Rivers state emergency rule is politically motivated to assuage a godfather and President Tinubu himself, being a godfather in Lagos politics, will protect godfatherism in politics. It is an obvious practice to protect “godfatherism hegemony” in Nigeria, and it was executed in an unprecedented manner, even if it will breach the constitution. There is no National Assembly that rubber stamps the Assembly presently, our Senate supported the motion that required a two-thirds majority vote with a voice vote. They engage in illegality with impunity.

President Tinubu forwarded ₦1.48 trillion Rivers State budget to the House of Representatives for approval. We need to ask under what section of the Constitution the President presents the budget of a State? Has President Tinubu now become the ACTING Governor of Rivers State? It is quite obvious that the emergency rule is about personal ambition and access to the wealth of the state.

The most authoritarian and despotic of military regimes couldn’t do things as daring as this, President Tinubu once condemned in a clear term the despotic regime of past dictators but now the President had outdone the dictators he once condemned?

It is now wrong to think that a constitutional democracy leverages on constitutional provisions and the rule of law, but rather now on impulse, personal interests and outright thuggery and state oppression through federal might to assuage an individual. Is our President now the “State” who can do no wrong? The members of the National Assembly are in connivance, condonation and collusion in achieving the new role for our President.

What is the status quo of Rivers State now after the unconstitutional Administrator had taken over? Has unthreatened peace been restored in Rivers State? Was the emergency rule really about any security breaches in Rivers State, or a wrong display of federal might to intimidate and cease power from the democratically elected Governor to pacify the state godfather?

If President Tinubu is really and literally ready, he can transmogrify into president for life, and SP Akpabio’s Senate will gladly confer it on him just for the asking! The opposition party are emasculated already, we only practically have one party for now, the coalition alliance is a sheer waste of time and resources.

One may think our Court will definitely help us out of the present wrong display of power? Mr Wike’s frightening image looms large in the horizon. Is there a light at the end of the tunnel, then?

The status quo continues, but who will deliver this country from its bondages?

We continue to keep silent on humongous corruption everywhere, and with plea bargains, corrupt officers can go home to enjoy the rest of their loot. Mr Ahmed Idris, former Accountant General, owns about 17 houses in London, Lagos, Kano, Abuja and Dubai, making public office a lucrative business in Nigeria. He was appointed on June 25, 2015.His predecessor, Jonah Ogunniyi Otunla, was dragged to the Federal High Court, Abuja for a two billion naira fraud. The allegation against Ahmed Idris makes Jonah’s alleged theft look like a minor offence. Pocketing eighty billion Naira is forty times more than what his predecessor allegedly stole; 80 billion naira is about 193 million dollars. If we compare this wealth to the United States of America’s individual wealth, with a look at the report by Boston Consulting Group published by Forbes Magazine, only about 5000 households in the United States of America have a net worth of 100 million dollars, not to talk of 193 million dollars. Mind you, America is presumably the richest country in the world.

Let’s do a small mathematical analysis. The salary of Nigeria’s president is about 26 million Naira a year. If Mr Ahmed as the former Accountant General, presumably earned one million dollars yearly (about one billion naira) though not possible, he will have to work for 80 years to earn 190 million dollars. If he spends 80 billion Naira, he will need about 80 years to spend about 90 million per month. This kind of looting will make the children of looters take to hard drugs, as evil hardly depart from the houses of such looters by karma factors. Many of the blood of innocent people had been shed due to the poor state and lack of hospitals and poor educational facilities, deplorable roads and their maintenance, lack of welfare packages for the poor and jobless youths as a result of looting by individuals like Mr Ahmed.

The reason for the aggressive quest for power, abuse of power, is not unconnected to greed and corruption. There are so many Emefieles walking audaciously around us, but they remain untouchable. Successors in Nigeria are always outdoing their predecessors in fraudulent practices. Is Ahmed or Emefiele in Prison now? No? Only those who stole chicken without money or influence can be sentenced to death in Nigeria. Until we prescribe death or life sentence for corruption, it will continue unabated with plea bargains syndrome. The politicians will continue to steal in excess and use 50 percent of their loot for a plea bargain and be free to spend the rest with their families.

President Tinubu should tackle corruption in the corridors of power. Corruption is the reason the godfather wants to control a sitting Governor and corruption is the reason why the unelected administrator desires to rule a state without constitutional backing. It is called governance corruption, and President Tinubu should not commit an impeachable offence to achieve it for the godfather, even if our National Assembly members are inactive to their responsibilities. The recent insertion of 7 trillion Naira into the budget by the National Assembly is an indication that they are there for the wrong and selfish motives. Institutionalised corruption starts with the National Assembly. Anything can be done for hard currency.

Dr Adedara is a Solicitor in Nigeria, England and Wales

The views expressed by contributors are strictly personal and not of Law & Society Magazine.

TIPS