Home Blog Page 303

𝗚𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝗨𝗽𝗼𝗻 𝗚𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗲: 𝗔 c𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗯𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 of t𝗵𝗲 b𝗮𝗽𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗺of 𝗚𝗼𝗼𝗱𝗙𝗮𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗘𝘇𝗶𝗻𝗻𝗮 𝗦𝗼𝗽𝗵𝗶𝗮 𝗨𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗲𝘇𝘂𝗲

By her loving parents, Amaka Udemezue and Sylvester Udemezue

  1. On this sacred day, Saturday, 07 June 2025, we stand as grateful witnesses to the infinite mercy of God, presenting our beloved daughter, GoodFaith Ezinna Sophia Udemezue, for the holy Sacrament of Baptism. Born on the eve of Christ’s nativity, 24 December 2024, and now baptized into His Body, the Church, our daughter’s name and story proclaim what words alone cannot express: a testimony of faith, survival, and divine love.
  2. She is our seventh and last child, born through Caesarean section, at once a miracle and a mystery. Just two days later, on 26 December 2024, as the world celebrated the season of joy, we entered a valley of shadows. Our tiny daughter was rushed into the Intensive Care Unit of Randle General Hospital, Mother and Child Centre, Gbaja, Surulere, Lagos. Hooked to oxygen and surrounded by machines, she clung to life with a strength only God could give. Her mother, too, was not spared. From 28 December 2024, Amaka lay in the hospital’s emergency ward, battling the complications of childbirth, her strength waning and her faith tested. Yet in that darkness, the light refused to be extinguished. And on 08 January 2025, after nearly two weeks of anguish, light overtook darkness. GoodFaith’s mother rose from her sickbed. Our daughter began to breathe freely. And on 13 January 2025, she was discharged, a victorious sign of God’s healing power.
  3. Today, five months later, we return not with sorrow, but with jubilation. We return to God’s altar to give back to Him what He graciously preserved. As Scripture declares: “The promise is for you and your children…” (Acts 2:39). We now claim that promise, as generations before us have done.
  4. As Catholics, we baptize her not because she understands, but because God understands. Because, as St. Augustine affirmed, “The custom of Mother Church in baptizing infants must not be disregarded… it is a tradition of the Apostles.” In this sacrament, she receives a gift she could never earn, a gift of pure grace, a new birth in Christ. We recall the words of our Lord Jesus: “Let the little children come to me… for the kingdom of God belongs to such as these” (Luke 18:16). And so, we bring her, not out of superstition, but out of faith. Not because she is perfect, but because God is perfect in mercy. St. Paul, writing to the Colossians, reminded the early Church: “You were circumcised… having been buried with Him in baptism” (Col. 2:11–12). In the old covenant, infants were marked with circumcision. In the new, baptism is that eternal mark of belonging.
  5. Origen, an early Church father, wrote: ” Infants are baptized for the remission of sins… the stain of original sin is washed away.” Luther and Calvin, though separated by centuries, both affirmed this act. “It is not the water,” said Luther, “but the Word of God with the water and faith that trusts it.” “Children of believers,” said Calvin, “belong to the Church. They too must be sealed.”
  6. Today, we do not merely celebrate a ritual. We celebrate a resurrection. A rebirth. A new name written in heaven. As C.S. Lewis wrote: “The Church claims to give him [the child] what it gives all: the grace of God, by the action of Christ.” And as G.K. Chesterton so memorably said: “The very fact that a baby can be baptized… is the defiance of spiritual snobbery.” In this act, we do not presume to understand all things; we simply trust. We trust that He who formed her in the womb, who sustained her in crisis, who preserved her through affliction, now receives her with joy into the communion of saints.
  7. Today, we, Amaka and Sylvester Udemezue, pledge before God, family, and Church that we shall guide her, pray with her, protect her, and raise her in the Catholic faith, so that one day she may joyfully affirm the grace she receives today.
  8. Dear daughter, GoodFaith Ezinna Sophia, Your name was not lightly given. You are a testament to the goodness of God. You are a living parable of faith triumphant over fear. You are light that came in darkness, born near Bethlehem’s star, and now marked forever with the seal of the Holy Spirit. May your life be long, holy, and radiant. May your steps be guided by the same grace that sustained your first breath. And may your soul never forget what your body receives today. You are God’s own child. You are baptized. You are beloved. Welcome to the Church, GoodFaith. Welcome to grace. Welcome home.
    Yours truly,
    Amaka Udemezue and Sylvester Udemezue
    08109024556.
    (07 June 2025)

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗲 𝗙𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘂𝗿𝗲: 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗡𝗼 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗲𝗳 𝗝𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗢𝗳 𝗡𝗶𝗴𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗮 𝗛𝗮𝘀 𝗟𝗲𝗳𝘁 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗣𝗼𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗸𝘀 𝗢𝗻 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗝𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗗𝗲𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗦𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿

By Sylvester Udemezue

Reacting to a breaking news-headline about the recent passing of a very respected Chief Justice of Nigeria, Emeritus, Hon Justice Mohammed Uwais, learned senior colleague and notable human rights advocate who is an emeritus First Vice President of the NBA, John Aikpokpo-Martins, Esq, has declared that “Nothing is sad about his passing on. He lived a fulfilled life and left indelible positive marks behind. He died an old man.”
➖➖

Dear distinguished learned Aikpokpo-Martins, Sir, while I agree with everything you have written, it’s difficult for me to agree that Hon Justice Uwais as Nigeria’s CJN “left indelible positive marks behind.” With due respect, it is my considered view that all former Chief Justices of Nigeria (CJNs), as well as the current one, including my Lord, Hon. Justice Uwais, were unsuccessful in discharging the responsibilities of their office in a manner that could justifiably qualify any of them as having left “indelible positive marks behind.” Sadly, with due respect, the current CJN appears set to end her tenure as perhaps among the worst of them all.

If we are to face REALITY and insist on substance over sentiment, I respectfully challenge anyone to point to a single “indelible positive mark” left behind by any former CJN, including Hon. Justice Uwais. Consider the following factual REALITIES in Nigeria’s judicial landscape as of 2025:

  1. As of 2025, Nigerian judges still record court proceedings in longhand, a practice long abandoned in most modern jurisdictions. This archaic method slows down trials and contributes significantly to the delays that have become synonymous with Nigerian courts.
  2. The Supreme Court of Nigeria, as of 2025, remains arguably the most disorganized, inconsistent, and ineffective apex court in the world. No coherent case management system exists, and decisions are often riddled with contradictions, leading to a serious crisis of judicial credibility.
  3. It is also the slowest Supreme Court in the world, routinely taking between 6 to 15 years to determine appeals before it. Many matters before it are simply adjourned indefinitely of for an unduly long time, sometimes for up to 3 to 4 years, thereby defeating the fundamental principle that “justice delayed is justice denied.”
  4. Lawyers and litigants are still required to travel from all over the country to Abuja in order to appear before the Supreme Court, incurring unnecessary expenses and risking security challenges, despite global advancements in remote hearing technologies.
  5. Cases are still being adjourned for three to five years, and it is not uncommon to see matters rescheduled without any consideration for urgency, public interest, or the rights of parties.
  6. Despite advancements in legal technology globally, Nigeria still operates manual filing and manual service of court processes, contrary to Section 36 of the 1999 Constitution, which guarantees “fair hearing within a reasonable time” for all litigants.
  7. Virtual hearings remain absent. Despite a global shift during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, the Nigerian judiciary has not PRACTICALLY institutionalized remote court sittings. Even copies of judgments are still not handed out to litigants and lawyers on the same day they are delivered, a basic practice in most well-functioning jurisdictions.
  8. There’s widespread inconsistency in the court’s decisions leading to uncertainty in judicial precedents and confusion in the legal system. For example, the Court was once said to have awarded a senatorial candidacy to a person who never participated in the party’s primary elections, thereby usurping the functions of the party members, the legislature and the electoral commission.
  9. The Supreme Court of Nigeria has become, in the eyes of many, a court reserved for the powerful and politically connected, where the pursuit of justice by the common man is often ignored. As I have written elsewhere: “If we agree that access to justice is a basic human right, to be enjoyed by all (including the lowly placed), then we are entitled to query the Nigerian Supreme Court’s different, partial, and unequal treatment of cases before it….The cry of the poor may not always be just, but if you don’t listen to it on time, you will never know what justice is.”
  10. The notion of “high-profile cases” in Nigeria, and the undue attention these cases receive, often at the expense of regular or so-called “low-profile” cases, are both thoughtless and indefensible. It has no place in any judicial system that aspires to fairness and effectiveness. In a truly functional and just legal system, all cases, regardless of the status, wealth, or influence of the parties involved, ought to receive equal treatment, attention, and expedition. Justice should not be stratified. Yet in Nigeria, our courts have institutionalized this senseless distinction, where high-profile cases are given priority and fast-tracked, while the everyday matters affecting ordinary citizens are neglected, delayed, and treated as secondary. This judicial partiality not only perpetuates systemic discrimination but also deepens the already troubling divide between the elite and the masses. It is, therefore, increasingly difficult to uphold in Nigeria, the oft-repeated saying that “the court is the last hope of the common man.” If anything, the REALITY seems to be the reverse: Nigerian courts appear structured and sustained through public funds, to primarily serve the interests of the privileged few, leaving the common man to his fate! The pressing question then becomes: where were the successive Chief Justices of Nigeria (CJNs) while this grave injustice took root and became normalized? What reforms did they initiate, or fail to initiate, to correct this inequity? Their silence and inaction raise serious concerns about the true legacy they have left behind.
  11. In other jurisdictions, it is the Chief Justice who typically leads initiatives toward meaningful pragmatic policy reforms and effective progress in justice delivery. But in Nigeria, what practical and pragmatic reforms has any CJN truly embarked upon? Where, then, are the so-called “indelible positive footprints”? Or are we perhaps confused about what actually constitutes positive footprints in reality? Can there be any such footprints in the absence of genuine progress?
  12. The immediate past CJN, Hon Justice Kayode Ariwoola, had on 12 October 2022, in a public address, pledged significant reforms aimed at modernizing the Nigerian judiciary. His promises then included the following: (i). Computerization of the Supreme Court and other courts of record; (ii). Introduction of e-filing and e-diary systems to reduce filing delays; (iii). Enabling lawyers to engage the court remotely via Zoom from their chambers; (iv). General advancement of the judiciary to benefit all Nigerians, especially through improved access to justice. Again, on 1 November 2023, at a three-day retreat in Uyo for Justices of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal, organised by AGA-Africa and the NJI, the CJN reaffirmed his commitment to judicial digitization, stating that “We must embrace the potential of technology” to enhance efficiency in justice delivery.” According to him, technology would streamline administrative tasks, facilitate legal research, reduce case backlogs, and improve transparency. However, looking back, one might ask: where’s Hon Justice Ariwoola with his promises of judicial reforms for Nigeria? Despite those bold and commendable promises made by my Lord in October 2022 and November 2023, one can see that very little was done in tangible terms to fulfill them. Nearly two years later, the Nigerian judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court, remains largely analogue, plagued by manual filing, physical court appearances, and prolonged delays. This failure to implement the promised technological reforms reflects a disturbing pattern of rhetoric without action. It undermines public trust in the judiciary and raises serious concerns about the sincerity and capacity of its leadership to deliver the kind of transformative justice system Nigeria so desperately needs. FURTHER READING:
  13. “Nigeria’s Supreme Court: About the Slowest in the World” By Sylvester Udemezue (The Guardian, 21 June 2021).
  14. “Prolonged Justice Dispensation as the Bane of Nigeria’s Judiciary: Leadership by Example as the Cure” By Sylvester Udemezue (TheNigeriaLawyer, 11 August 2021).
  15. “Nigerian Justice Sector Reforms: Enough Talking Done, and Promises Made. Now is Time for Action and Doing Things Differently” By Sylvester Udemezue (TripleNet Media, 1 November 2023).
  16. “Snail-Paced Justice Dispensation in Nigerian Courts: Factors and Actors” By Sylvester C. Udemezue, in U.D. Ikoni, T.F. Yerima, and P.H. Faga (eds), Judicial Autonomy, Administration of Justice and Contemporary Trends in Development of Legal Profession In Nigeria: Essays In Honour of His Lordship, Hon Justice S.O Itodo (1st, Wisdom Books & Publishing, Makurdi, Nigeria 2023) 511-530. ISBN: 978-978-746-8-3
  17. “How Many Times Will Lagos Judiciary ‘Launch’ E-filing? Will They Ever Fully Start, in Reality?” By Sylvester Udemezue (LawAndSociety Magazine, 6 February 2025).
  18. “RE: Uduak Akpan Who Killed Job Seeker, Iniubong, Hanged to Death” – Sylvester Udemezue (Barristerng, 7 September 2024): “A Law School student appearing before my panel for Portfolio Assessment on 4 September 2024, was so sad to announce that he was at the Supreme Court when a matter was adjourned from 2024 to 2028.”
  19. “The Supreme Court of Nigeria as All-in-One: The Legislative, Executive and Judicial Court, All at the Same Time?” By Sylvester Udemezue (TripleNet Media, 3 March 2023).
  20. “Endangered Species: See the Fifteen (15) Most Vicious and Relentless Oppressors of Lawyers and the Law Profession in Nigeria” By Sylvester Udemezue (CourtroomMail, 28 February 2022).
  21. “How Leaders of Nigeria’s Judiciary Dissipate Valuable Time on Irrelevancies” By Sylvester Udemezue (Newswire, 16 May 2020).
  22. “Let Only High-profile Nigerians Fund the Supreme Court; It Has Become a Court for High-profile Cases Only” – Sylvester Udemezue (The Nigerian Voice, 17 June 2022).
  23. “RE: JUSTICE SECTOR REFORM SUMMIT 2024.” By Sylvester Udemezue (BarAndBenchNews; 27 April 2024).
  24. “Extent of Statutory Involvement of Incumbent CJN in the Process to Appoint Mr. Olukayode Ariwoola (Jnr) a Judge of the FHC” By Sylvester Udemezue (DnlLegalAndStyle; 17 July 2023);
  25. “How to Stop the Current Unacceptable Delay in Court Justice Delivery in Nigeria (Part 1).” By Sylvester Udemezue (DNLLEGALAND LSTYLE; 2 January 2022);
  26. “Thirty (30) Things I Must Do to Make My Court Work Effectively, If I Were a Trial Judge” By Sylvester Udemezue (DNLLEGALAND LSTYLE; 6 May 2023);
  27. ““Always Exhaust Alternative Options Before Resorting To Litigation,” Delta Judge Admonishes NBA Members” By Sylvester Udemezue (BarristerNG; 30 June 2024);
  28. Etc
    Respectfully,
    Sylvester Udemezue (udems)
    Proctor, The Reality Ministry of Truth, Law and Justice, Nigeria (A Nonaligned, Nonprofit Public Interest Law Advocacy Group).
    Tel: 08039136749.
    Email: [email protected].
    (06 June 2025)

The Gripping tales of patients who survived near-death experiences in Nigeria’s failing health system

Amid a crumbling health system plagued by doctor shortages, obsolete or inadequate medical equipment, and poor infrastructure, some Nigerian patients have defied the odds—surviving harrowing, life-threatening conditions and living to tell their stories, epitomising sheer resilience, writes VICTOR AYENI

To many of her friends and family, Pastor Stella Omotola was best known for her unwavering dedication to church activities at a Pentecostal church in Ibadan, Oyo State, which she had faithfully attended for over three decades.

So, it was not unusual when the grandmother told her husband on March 5, 2025, that she was going to a midweek prayer meeting at the church.

Although the church was just a five-minute walk from her home, that day, the 68-year-old chose to drive her car, a choice that perhaps later contributed to saving her life.

After the evening service, she decided to take her malfunctioning phone to a technician whose shop was adjacent to the church for repairs.

It was around 6:25 p.m., and the surroundings were still bright as sunset approached. But just as the grandmother crossed the first lane of the busy road and was about to step onto the second, the unexpected happened.

“As I climbed off the curb to cross the road, for reasons I still can’t understand, I slipped and fell down right in the middle of the road. The drivers who saw me falling quickly hit their brakes.

 “But there was a man riding a commercial motorcycle who was on full speed. He overtook the cars and ran over my head before I could get up. I screamed in pain,” she winced as she recounted her ordeal to Sunday PUNCH.

From there, a wave of agony engulfed the retired vice principal as sympathisers nearby quickly rushed to the scene and moved her to the side of the road.

“My eyeglasses were still on,” Mrs Omotola recalled. “I noticed my purse had fallen and its contents were scattered on the ground. I quickly gathered them back into my purse, held it with one hand, and sat at the corner of the road as people gathered around me.

“By then, blood was gushing from my head and covering one of my eyes. Someone from the crowd wanted to pour water on me. I raised my hand to signal ‘no,’ but I couldn’t speak loudly. Another woman suggested that I be taken to a private hospital in the area, but I didn’t want that, so I managed to shout, ‘Please, take me to a government hospital!’

“I brought out my car key and waved it at the crowd. ‘I have a car, this is my key!’ I kept saying. By then, other pastors and members of our church had seen me and immediately rushed to my aid. With the help of a stranger in the crowd who offered to drive, I was taken to the hospital that evening.”

When the grandmother arrived at the hospital, a medical staff member informed her that the emergency ward was full, as too many patients had already been admitted.

By then, her clothes were soaked with blood, and in a desperate attempt to stop the bleeding, she pressed the wound against a tight edge of the car seat.

“We were still outside because they couldn’t take us in. I had to tell one of our pastors who was there to call one of my sons, who made calls and, through the intervention of a high-ranking staff member in the hospital, they found me a bed space in their emergency unit.

“A nurse attended to me and asked for my name and medical details, which were recorded. My younger brother, who had arrived after being informed of my accident, hurried to obtain blood from the hospital’s blood bank after cross-matching was done,” she recounted.

‘I saw myself leave the earth’

The grandmother told Sunday PUNCH that two hours after the accident, she was still not attended to due to the large number of patients being treated by only two doctors on duty and the unavailability of suturing instruments to stop the bleeding.

Word quickly reached the pastor’s children, who lived in other states. In a frantic effort to help their mother, they made calls and sent money while she weakly clutched her bleeding head as she lay on the hospital bed.

“I was in pain and getting weaker. People around me kept calling for help. At that point, I could only pray because I knew there was nothing else I could do. I realised that I could pass on before I got medical help.

“There were too many patients compared to the doctors present in that ward. I remember telling the people close to me, ‘Tell them to come and help me, I’m getting tired.’

“I became so weak that I could no longer speak, but inside me, I began to say my last prayer and asked God to forgive me of all my sins, and I also forgave everyone who had ever offended me,” the 68-year-old said, shaking her head as she recounted the ordeal.

Fortunately, two doctors came from another ward, took over Mrs Omotola’s case, and began to suture what was later found to be three deep lacerations on her head.

But while the procedure was ongoing, the grandmother became unconscious and unresponsive.

“At that point, I just knew I had drifted from the earth,” she told our correspondent. “The earth looked green. I saw myself travelling through a place which I can only describe as what looked like a rectangular tunnel.

“I could hear two persons whispering from one end of it, but I felt no more pain. I looked at myself and saw that I had a form just like my physical body, and I could hear very delightful music coming from afar. I tried to sing along to that music, but I couldn’t. Then I heard the loud voice of someone standing beside me, though I didn’t see him.”

“He asked me three questions, and from there, I got the notion that he wanted me to pray, so I started praying in my spirit. As that happened, something burst through the space or tunnel I was travelling through, and I saw myself pulled back into the earth, into my physical body.

“Then I began to hear again what people around me were saying. That was how I came back to life. The doctors who attended to me and everyone present at the hospital couldn’t believe I made it despite the volume of blood I lost,” she said, as her face lit up.

One of Mrs Omotola’s siblings, who pleaded anonymity, told Sunday PUNCH that he was present while his sister’s injuries were being sutured, noting that her hands actually stopped moving.

“Before she was transfused, she had been talking and was even pleading for us to give her water. But then, she became motionless, and her pulse wasn’t felt again. When I saw this, I quickly left the ward in anguish because I knew we had lost her. After a while, I was called back in. They had started transfusing her.

“She was still unconscious, but I saw her slightly raise her right hand as if she were pointing at something, like she was trying to signify something to us, and her mouth started moving as she began praying again! I couldn’t believe my eyes. She was given three pints of blood in total,” he said.

Health sector challenges

After Omotola regained consciousness, her condition rapidly improved until she was discharged from the hospital four days after the incident.

A computerised tomography scan conducted on her, a copy of which was sent to our correspondent, showed that she suffered no skull fracture during the accident — a malady which would have worsened her condition.

This scenario reflected how many patients struggle to cling to the thread of life and hope amid Nigeria’s failing health sector, which continues to battle a number of challenges.

In January, the Medical and Dental Consultants’ Association of Nigeria disclosed that the current ratio of one doctor to 2,500 patients in Nigeria fell short of the World Health Organisation’s recommendation of one doctor to 600 patients.

In April, the Coordinating Minister of Health and Social Welfare, Dr Muhammad Pate, revealed that the doctor-to-population ratio in the country “now stands at around 3.9 per 10,000,” adding that 16,000 doctors have emigrated from the country in the last seven years.

This mass exodus of medical professionals has intensified as a result of poor remuneration, inadequate health facilities, rising insecurity, and Nigeria’s challenging work environment.

Consequently, many health professionals in the country continue to languish under excessive workloads, burnout, and a lack of professional development opportunities.

This uneven distribution of skilled doctors has also plunged many patients who need urgent medical care into delays in treatment, increased referrals to other hospitals, and cancelled surgeries, leading to preventable deaths.

Health and biosafety experts have also decried the current approach of citizens providing emergency care from the scene of accidents to health centres, adding that inadequate emergency responses were increasingly turning emergencies into funerals.

Drawing on his years of experience, a senior medical officer, Dr Paul Anejodo, pointed out that he had seen many needless deaths, especially those related to emergency and trauma.

“A common cause is lack of available medical equipment, especially oxygen tanks. There is also a lack of doctors. In Nigeria, it’s one doctor to 10,000 patients!

“We also don’t have enough sub-specialty and government hospitals that are affordable for ordinary Nigerians. Many of our hospitals also lack emergency preparedness,” he told Sunday PUNCH.

Anejodo further explained that when he worked at a mission hospital, a patient who had suffered head trauma was referred to their facility, but on assessment, it was found that urgent monitoring by a neurosurgical team and spine surgeons was required.

He said when the medical team told the relatives about the need to refer the patient, they broke down in tears.

“They had been to about four teaching hospitals already, and they were rejected for one reason or another. Either the bed spaces weren’t enough, or there was no available ICU, or the subspecialty to manage the case was on leave or unavailable.

“In cases like this, we have to find another private hospital, which is really far away from us and refer. I can imagine how much time was wasted before this particular patient eventually got the care he needed,” Anejodo added.

An unforgettable day

As a staff member of a firm that operated a contract to supply diesel for telecommunications sites, Andre Tony was well familiar with the safety rules that guide driving.

The 40-year-old was at the time assigned to follow the trucks rented to supply the diesel and monitor them so that fuel was efficiently moved from the depot to the site where it was offloaded.

His task was to prevent the product from being diverted or sold, after which he would take public transport back to Lagos, where another fuel tank would be loaded at the depot.

But nothing could have prepared Tony for the traumatic ordeal he underwent on June 9, 2018, while travelling to Uromi, Edo State, from Lagos in a truck carrying 33,000 litres of diesel.

“When we arrived at Oluku, Edo State, there was a sloppy bend on the road and a pothole, and you’re expected to slow down before reaching it. That day, I sighted a small commercial bus (korope), which had on board an old woman and a man (the driver). There was another industrial truck, a 40-foot tipper, carrying big stones, approaching us.

“I was sitting close to the driver and noticed that we weren’t slowing down. So, I was about to tell the driver, ‘Oga, what’s going on?’ Before I could open my mouth, the guy just jumped out of the vehicle along with one of the motor boys, leaving the second motor boy with me.”

“I shouted out, ‘Iku re e!’ (This is death!) The next thing I heard was a series of loud sounds. The back of the industrial truck carrying rocks collided with our truck. Although our truck didn’t fall and the diesel we carried didn’t spill, the collision caused fractures in both of my legs, and my left leg was broken from the knee down,” Tony told Sunday PUNCH.

Trapped in a wreckage

Moments after the incident, Tony recalled being able to hear and see what was going on around him, but was unable to speak due to the wounds inflicted on his chest and mouth.

The severity of the crash also broke the waist of the second motor boy who was with him.

Other motorists, as well as the driver who had earlier escaped from the truck, rushed to the scene of the accident to rescue Tony.

“I could see that people parked their vehicles and were calling me, but I couldn’t respond to them, and I was stuck in the truck. My body started shaking as if I wanted to give up.

“I spent more than an hour in that wreckage. All my thoughts at that time were about my mother, who didn’t know what had happened to me. I had no wife or children. I was 34 years old at the time, and I kept telling myself I needed to survive.

“By the time the road safety officers came to rescue me, I had fainted. They broke through the wreckage to bring me out, and blood was coming out of my mouth. I was the only one they carried from the scene. I never saw the motor boy again,” Tony added.

When Tony was taken to the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, he regained the ability to speak and was able to tell the doctor his medical details and his sister’s phone number before he passed out again.

“I had two surgeries performed on me. If not for a medical professor there, who insisted they shouldn’t amputate my leg and opted for surgery, my left leg would have been amputated,” he recounted.

Tony added, “I still can’t fold my leg, and one of my toes is still not working. They placed implants in my leg to guide the broken bones, and I was introduced to compression socks. I had to be careful to avoid hitting the legs because of these implants.

“After five years, my family, friends, and the company I now work with supported me to get them out because the screws used to hold my bone together were beginning to come out of my flesh. Back then, if I wore shorts, people would see these screws protruding from my legs like boils. So, we had to quickly get them out.”

In 2023, the Federal Road Safety Corps disclosed that 40,000 people die annually from road traffic crashes in Nigeria, adding that these are the leading cause of death and disability in the country.

“There is a need for Nigerian drivers to be professionally trained in safety procedures, first aid, health emergency responses, and every other aspect of their work. This is the best way to minimise road accidents and complications that may result from them,” the Chief Executive Officer of DriveMe Mobility, Damilola Odunlade-Akeju, told Sunday PUNCH.

Nobody thought I’d survive

February 22, 2020, has remained an unforgettable day for Ahmed Sanusi, a virologist, who at the time was a medical student in Ibadan, Oyo State.

After spending the whole  Friday night reading to prepare for an upcoming examination, the extremely tired 25-year-old walked to the nearest junction from the University College Hospital at about 6 a.m. the next day, which was Saturday.

Unable to get a bike, Sanusi carried his bag tiredly and decided to walk down the street to his house. As he arrived at his street, two guys alighted from a bike ahead of him and ran towards him.

Speaking in Yoruba, the two men demanded money from the student, who could barely converse in the language spoken by the assailants.

“To be honest, I had only N400 in my wallet, and my bank account was also empty. I avoided an argument with them because I didn’t know what they were capable of doing.

“Before I could utter any further words, one of them raised a machete and hit me hard on my head. I fell down immediately, and he put his hands inside my pocket and took my phone.

“He inquired what I had in my bag, and I told him there was nothing. He noticed a bike was coming, so they left me, climbed their bike and drove off. I stood up and ran after them, screaming, ‘Ole, Ole! (thief),’ but nobody came to help me. The bike man that was coming before turned back and ran,” Sanusi recounted.

Drenched in his blood, Sanusi struggled to walk down to his house. Blood “was gushing out like a tap that was left open,” he said.

Help came when he walked down to the mosque in his area, and people there took him to the hospital.

“I bled for over 30 minutes non-stop. No amount of pressure was able to stop the bleeding. At the hospital, I was rushed to the emergency section. The nurses on duty had never seen such bleeding before.

“The doctor immediately came out to attend to me. No amount of ice packs could stop the bleeding. The doctor had no option but to suture my head with stitches to maintain homeostasis and stop the bleeding.

“My eyes were flooded, my mouth filled with blood. My nose and ears had blood inside them as well. I couldn’t utter any word, I had bled out all my strength. They immediately ordered blood for me; afterwards, I was taken to the ward. I couldn’t stand or move at all. Nobody thought I’d survive,” Sanusi recalled.

According to the doctor who treated him, one wrong move with the machete would have affected his brain and cost him his life.

However, as the days rolled by, Sanusi moved through different stages of recovery and was eventually discharged from the hospital.

Improved remuneration

The President of the Nigerian Medical Association, Prof Bala Audu, explained that, “Population is increasing, demand on individual doctors is also increasing, while the doctors are leaving the country for greener pastures. 15,000 doctors had left the country for greener pastures abroad in the last five years.

“There are difficulties pushing the doctors to leave the country, one of which is poor working conditions and remuneration. Here we are calling for the payment of seven months’ outstanding arrears and the consequential adjustments to doctors working in federal tertiary health institutions,” he said.

Audu further revealed that the NMA has advocated the universal applicability of the Consolidated Medical Salary Structure to its members in all sectors to reduce the brain drain syndrome.

At a press conference held last year, the Chairman of the Medical and Dental Consultants Association of Nigeria at the UCH, Ibadan, Dr Foluke Fasola, decried the rate at which medical personnel are leaving the country.

She noted that the poor remuneration of health workers, in addition to the poor work environment, has contributed to this, thus making many medical professionals resort to a lot of improvising.

“One of the solutions is to improve the remuneration of healthcare workers. However, I know that there are healthcare workers outside who need employment but are not being employed. There are some government policies that are stifling the employment process because, even before the usual japa syndrome, we were understaffed,” Fasola noted.

‘Our experiences changed us’

However, some of the patients who defied the odds to survive, despite the challenges in the country’s health sector, say their experiences have changed their perspectives on life, family, and spirituality.

“It was God who sent me back here; He gave me a second chance at life. So many people came to see me at the hospital and showed me love. The accident has instilled in me the need to be closer to God, bond more with my family, and love and forgive people,” Mrs Omotola told Sunday PUNCH.

Tony, now married and a father of two, has also learnt much since 2018, when he survived the accident in Edo State.

“It was a miracle. The doctors predicted that I would be on crutches or in a wheelchair for the rest of my life, but look at me today, I can stand and walk,” he said.

“Everyone was saying I’m a strong person, but I know it’s only God who kept me. I’m a survivor,” Sanusi wrote on his X account, a week after the accident.

“I’m still recovering from this incident and the associated trauma because I can’t even stand in crowded places anymore. I get scared when unfamiliar faces come too close to me.”

Culled from The PUNCH

Jokolo and oratio classicus to Supreme Court

By Lanre Adewole

In a nail-biter last Wednesday, the Supreme Court handed a narrow defeat to the deposed Emir of Gwandu, Al-Mustapha Haruna Jokolo, in his 20-year judicial criss-cross to regain his lost kingdom and paradisiacal influence as a first-class traditional ruler in Kebbi State and North as a whole.

The slim win -gifted the appointing and dismissing authority, the state government and the incumbent Gwandu traditional head, Muhammadu Illiyasu Bashar, by the majority of the Bench’s panel that eventually interred the matter, roused and split the North, with its elite siding either ways on the controversial ruling and the involved dramatic personae, as decades-old relationships dictate.

One unmissable post-ruling intervention uncharacteristically came from immediate president, Muhammadu Buhari, openly siding with the incumbent Emir, his long-standing friend and coursemate in the military, against Jokolo, his “boy” and former Aide-de-camp, when he was military head of state between December 31 1983 and August 27, 1985. The two-time Nigerian leader is no doubt a life-long nepotist in his Arewa-centrism, but he has also shown capacity to be aso tun sosi ma ba ibi kan je (adept at balancing act), especially in two-fightings in which he doesn’t want to be seen taking sides.

He kept the eccentric EFCC czar, Ibrahim Magu in office for over five years in acting capacity, knowing full well he was wanted out by his kitchen cabinet led by then-powerful secret service boss, the bearded Lawan Daura. He even had both feted in villa and shared Jumat prayer mat with them on April 21, 2017 as their animosity raged. The gladiators even shook hands in what appeared an armistice, only for Daura, after the “peace talks” to cause another damning security report to doom Magu’s chances of getting senate confirmation as the substantive chair of the anti-graft agency.

While the Magu drama painted Buhari as not being in the driver’s seat of his government, there was a positive posture of him as a due process leader, despite one of the gladiators being a rumored relative and the other, administration’s anti-corruption poster boy. But in the Gwandu royal rumble, he came out swinging against the man once chosen to lay his life for him as his ADC, calling his lawfare against the incumbent a distraction, as quoted by his forever-media aide Garba Shehu. Hear the former president; “You (Bashar) have always worked for the betterment of your people and the nation, even under those circumstances, I hope you will continue to promote peace, happiness and prosperity of the people in Gwandu Emirate and beyond. I thank Allah for this victory and pray for your long life and good health”.

As reported by NAN, Mr. Buhari spoke from London, which means it was a priority errand for Mr. Shehu. If Buhari is still this attached to the case out of office, it is better left to imagination how much help his friend must have received from him while he was the Commander-in-Chief of Nigeria.

A senior lawyer from the North, Barrister Aminu Usman, generously provided me a context to Buhari’s one-sidedness.

“Muhammadu Iliyasu Bashar as a retired General is Buhari’s military cadet school classmate. Jokolo was Buhari’s ADC. Buhari could only make amends to his classmate as it was Buhari’s influence (and Sambo Dasuki) with Abacha that catapulted Jokolo over Muhammad Iliyasu Bashar to get Jokolo on to the Emirship. Once Jokolo was dethroned, they made sure Iliyasu got onto the throne” the gentleman lawyer enlightened.

It is likely Jokolo had spurned his former boss’s admonition to let go. So why not the “yegede” (we told you so) taunt when the former “boy” was floored. Even old men are allowed to be child-like petty, once in a while.

It is certainly going to be a while before dust will finally settle in the Jokolo judgement considering the region-wide interest it is generating and the rumblings in the justice sector over what is widely perceived as the triumph of technicality over sound interpretation of the law governing the making and the unmaking of Emirs in Kebbi State, as well as the power of deposition being exercised by governors across board. Aside Kano where the apex court is also expected to draw the curtains in the cousins’ feud over the ancient throne, what could pass for a mini-Arewa Spring against sitting traditional rulers is also stirring the Zazzau Emirate. The deposed Wazirin Zazzau, Ibrahim Muhammad–Aminu, has petitioned the Kaduna State House of Assembly, seeking reversal of the appointment of the 19th Emir of Zazzau, Ahmad Nuhu-Bamalli. In the petition sent to the Assembly speaker, Yusuf Dahiru–Liman, the former Waziri accused the immediate governor of the state, Nasir El-Rufai, of unlawfully installing Bamalli as Emir in November 2020 in violation of established traditions and state laws.

Both Jokolo and Nuhu-Bamali are 19th Emir of their emirates. Is the sun about setting for the Zazzau man too?

In a statement acknowledging his judicial defeat, Jokolo called out unnamed Judases who allegedly doomed his return to the throne, after two judicial victories at the lower courts. Can President Buhari be pinned in this [accusation]? He cursed some and predicted their imminent shame. Beyond his grief, his statement was timely, considering that the recent malaise ailing Supreme Court pronouncements was close to full manifestation before his defeat confirmation burned it out.

Unlike years of yore when Supreme Court answered its final court name in bold printing of granted reliefs, precision in orders made and great articulation of jurisprudence interpretations in ways difficult for jobbers and lobbyists to spin, the apex court these days, leaves issues brought for determination more intractable with cloudy pronouncements and very jumbled orders, so much so that feuding parties leave the court simultaneously claiming victory. It was so for Labour Party. Even after Supreme Court ruled on its leadership crisis, no clear leader still emerged.

Multiple personalities still parade themselves as the lawful national chairman. Same for the PDP on its national secretaryship. Before Jokolo’s admittance, the information highway was getting saturated with his reinstatement. Can the apex court embrace better clarity next time? Most of the affected cases are political, involving the opposition, but nothing is being assumed here even as the disturbing pattern persists. Being the final court, the finality in its pronouncements must be nuanced enough for parties to know where they stand.

As the traditional institution and political leadership continue to knock heads over the latter’s assumed power to depose, a brilliant op-ed by Mr. Usman, with intrinsic historical insight, will be a great material for constitutional historians and progressive political leaders to engage conversations that could defrost throne tension, especially in Northern Nigeria.

Here is an excerpt; “An examination of the Chiefs (Appointment and Deposition) Law will show that it made provisions only on procedure for appointment of Chiefs. No provisions are made in the Law for (a) complaints and petitions on a wrong selection procedures or outcome that culminated in an appointment, to provide for challenge of the outcome before the appointment is made, and (b) no provision is made for a fair internal administrative dispute resolution procedure, before deposition or dethronement or after a person has been removed from office. Thus, is the Supreme Court stepping into the shoes of the State House of Assembly to make that legislative provision in the State Law?”

If there is no provision for internal administrative dispute resolution, on what pedestal was the majority of the apex court panel expecting Jokolo to stand, in exploring the option, the absence of which the court said dealt his reclamation effort a fatal blow.

Hear Usman again, “The Supreme Court concluded that non-exhaustion of the internal administrative dispute resolution procedure for challenging the removal, ousted the jurisdiction of the State High Court and as a result the State High Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the suit brought by HRH Mustapha Jokolo against his dethronement as Emir of Gwandu. This is a surprising decision of the Supreme Court in the face of its subsisting decisions on interpretation of Section 6 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) on judicial powers and Section 250 that confers exclusive and unlimited jurisdiction on the

State High Court. The Supreme Court has, in interpreting these provisions, held that no administrative requirement made in legislation may derogate or oust the exclusive and unlimited jurisdiction of the High Court. Here is the Supreme Court now saying non-exhaustion of internal administrative dispute procedure ousts the jurisdiction of the State High Court”.

It is concerning enough for the justice system that Jokolo’s judicial journey took 9 years at the high court, two at the court of appeal, Sokoto division and another nine at the apex court.

Proverbs 13:12 says, “Hope deferred makes the heart sick”. Jokolo was 33 years when terminated by the military government of IBB, succeeded his “53 suitcases” father ten years later, then terminated from the throne at 53. Now he is 73. Even if reinstated, he would be just a symbolic leader, considering that the piquancy that comes with youthfulness is long gone. His so-long-a journey in Nigerian courts is a tragic summation of the catastrophe of the snail-speed justice system. As rumoured, even if some conspiracy “delayed” his case file in the dockets of the two courts where it spent a cumulative of 18 years; that should make it more worrisome that someone of his reach could get that cancelled. What hope then for ordinary Nigerians? Judiciary must reform itself and it is clear now that at least regional if not state, Supreme Courts are as exigent as state police.

About three weeks before the Jokolo judgement fiasco, precisely on May 16, professor of Law, Senior Advocate and Nigeria’s immediate vice president, Yemi Osinbajo delivered an uncharacteristic stinging rebuke to the Supreme Court over its sloppiness and flip-flop in the interpretation of constitutional issues, leading to confusion in jurisprudential application of precedents, as the apex court keeps creating multiple precedents for individual cases where it was supposed to chart a path for lower courts. Barrister Usman has just pointed out the precedent inconsistency in the Gwandu case.

Osinbajo, delivering a keynote address at the 2025 NBA Yenagoa Branch, listed multiple examples of the apex court derailing from precedents.

Today, 23 days after his slashing analysis on the frightening drop in the quality of judgements coming from the ultimate court, the lords of the apex bench led by the Chief Justice should be huddling at an emergency retreat, seeking ways to halt the skid into notoriety.

The views expressed by contributors are strictly personal and not of Law & Society Magazine.

Re: El-Tufiakwa – Muyiwa Adekeye and the art of manufacturing consent

By Luke Godwin Waziri

Dear Mr. Muyiwa Adekeye,

Thank you for the amusement provided by your epistle, “Chidi Odinkalu and the art of peddling lies.” If your intention was to create a case study in defensive obfuscation and historical gymnastics, then consider it a success. Your piece is not so much a defence of your principal – Nasir El-Rufa’i, for whom you have worked as Media Adviser and publicist for over one decade – as it is an indictment of everything that has gone wrong with public accountability, selective memory, and the weaponization of government narratives.

Let’s begin where your imagination truly soared: your claim that traditional councils of Kajuru, Lere, Kagarko, and Kauru (in Southern Kaduna) “applied to be redesignated as emirates.” Fascinating! Are we to believe that these communities, many of them with overwhelmingly non-Muslim populations, suddenly woke up and decided to discard their ancestral identities, voluntarily submitting themselves to a system historically alien to their cultural and religious realities? Next, you’ll tell us that the Gbagyi people applied to become Japanese.

Please, Mr. Adekeye, let’s retain at least a shred of intellectual honesty.

You speak of “territorial naming” as though it were a holy doctrine handed down from the heavens. Yet you conveniently ignore that the “tribal naming” you so detest reflects the lived realities and history of the people who occupy those lands. The Adara chiefdom, for instance, was not an invention of convenience. It represented an actual ethnic nation, with a distinct language, culture, and worldview. This was not a naming error to be corrected by colonial-style administrative fiat, but a reflection of who the people are. The real problem, sir, is not the name, it is the State’s discomfort with any identity that cannot be neatly assimilated into a preferred ethno-religious narrative.

Your attempt to gaslight us into believing the abduction and murder of His Royal Highness, the late Dr. Maiwada Raphael Galadima, Agom Adara III, was entirely disconnected from political tensions is equally disgraceful. You cite eyewitnesses  – Mrs. Galadima and one Mr. Stephen Audu Garba – and use them as human shields for a more sinister erasure of responsibility. But curiously, your version carefully dodges the public knowledge that the Agom Adara was in the middle of contesting the State’s attempt to balkanize the Adara chiefdom and forcefully redesignate his people’s identity. However, unknown to him, he had been outstripped by El-Rufa’i’s misuse of official powers who surreptitiously dethroned the late monarch vide an Executive Order that balkanized Adara Chiefdom. The Executive Order ceded the Adara of Kajuru Local Government Area with over 30 Village Heads (including the late Agom Adara who incidentally was of Kajuru origin) into Kajuru Emirate with only two Village Heads. Your principal lacked the audacity to face the late monarch directly. This was what necessitated the abduction and cowardly murder of the late Agom Adara – it was essential to facilitate the implementation of your principal’s malevolent schemes against the Adara and the communities of Southern Kaduna.

You also casually mention that the late monarch only ever interacted with Governor El-Rufa’i “during the regular meetings with the State Council of Chiefs.” And we’re supposed to believe this exonerates your principal? How convenient! So long as it wasn’t a “one-on-one” meeting, you consider the Governor blameless for the spiraling ethnic and administrative aggression that preceded the monarch’s death. But leadership is not only about physical presence; it is about the consequences of policy and power. That you cannot grasp this is deeply revealing.

Your portrayal of the Kasuwan Magani crisis in October 2018 is another performance in selective framing. While you remember to tell us that El-Rufa’i “commiserated” with the victims of the violence, you forgot to mention the consistent pattern of inflammatory statements, demographic manipulation, and high-handed decisions that helped fertilize such crises. El-Rufa’i has long excelled in dropping matches in dry forests, then acting surprised when fires break out.

On the issue of the Traditional Institutions Law of 2021, what a masterstroke of control disguised as reform! You speak of “classifying” chiefdoms and emirates as though traditional identity were a spreadsheet to be edited on a whim. In truth, this was not classification but a strategic redesign of cultural authority in favour of an emirate model more amenable to the governor’s ideological worldview. It was less about unity and more about homogenization, unity by subtraction.

You may recall that in their response to the Traditional Institutions Bill at the time in 2021, the Autochthonous Community Development Associations (CDAs) of Kaduna State rightly accused your principal of giving vent to a strategy to “divide and conquer the indigenous ethnic groups.” When it struck down the deposition of Jonathan Paragua Zamuna, the Chief of Piriga, in June 2024, the National Industrial Court of Nigeria suggested that the powers claimed by your principal under the Traditional Institutions Law of 2021 amounted to an assertion of “executive absolutism”.

Then there’s your precious anecdote about the 2019 killings in Kajuru LGA and your effort to paint Chidi Odinkalu as a denialist. Here, your indignation is loudest, but your evidence is weakest. You claim he “denied the killings”,  but you omit that many of his concerns were about the timing, context, and selective outrage surrounding those deaths. In a country where politicians weaponize tragedy and deploy casualty figures like chess pieces, Odinkalu’s caution was not denial; it was due diligence.

The reference to Dr. Jibrin Ibrahim’s tweet is especially ironic. A one-off tweet becomes your Exhibit A in a bid to delegitimize years of principled advocacy by Odinkalu. It’s always amusing when those who thrive on official propaganda try to shame others for scepticism, as if state-issued narratives are gospel and civil society is the problem.

Your claim that Odinkalu was “prosecuted for injurious falsehood” might sound ominous in your telling, but let’s not pretend that Kaduna State under el-Rufa’i was a bastion of justice. The same administration that hounded Odinkalu also harassed journalists, suppressed community leaders, and turned civil resistance into an offence. The fact that Odinkalu “evaded arrest”, in a case riddled with procedural irregularities and without a file record, speaks not to guilt, but to the absurdity of a state trying to criminalize dissent. I doubt if anyone is more obsessed and impervious to facts than you when it comes el-Rufa’i.

Finally, your entire piece rests on the hope that repetition equals truth. But as the philosopher Hannah Arendt once said: “The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction has collapsed.” You and your principal may continue trying to collapse those lines, but some of us still remember. And to sum it up, the unflattering description which you ascribe to Professor Odinkalu actually fits you perfectly.

We remember that the Adara people didn’t apply to become an emirate.

We remember that the late Agom Adara was resisting – not requesting – redesignation.

We remember that curfews replaced justice, and that silence was demanded, not earned.

We remember, because remembering is resistance.

So no, Mr. Adekeye, your write-up is not a rebuttal; it’s a poor attempt at historical laundering. The real facts, inconvenient as they are, will outlive both your article and your principal’s legacy of imposed identities.

Yours in memory and truth,

Luke Godwin Waziri

A Concerned Citizen of a Still-Wounded State

Luke Godwin Waziri is a lawyer in Kaduna & former General Secretary of the Adara Development Association (ADA)

*This is a selection from right of reply to last week’s column, “El-Tufiakwa for El-Rufai

The IRREPLACEABLE Uwais, JSC: Five judgements of Uwais that show courage, moral and ethical contents of judgments of the Supreme Court of Nigeria are now diluted

By Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja

In the year 2018, the popular United States of America (USA) singer Beyoncé Knowles sang a song entitled “IRREPLACEABLE.”

The chorus of that song goes thus:

“You must not know about me
You must not know ’bout me
I could have another you in a minute,
Matter fact, he’ll be here in a minute, baby
You must not know ’bout me
You must not know ’bout me
I could have another you by tomorrow
So don’t you ever for a second get to thinkin’
Your irreplaceable”.

That song was a bad market for men!!!

The year 2018 witnessed the highest number of break-ups of relationships because of that song.

At the slightest provocation, ladies were quick to quote the lyrics of Beyonce’s song entitled IRREPLACEABLE.

” I can have another you in a minute” became the break-up anthem!!!

Unlike the men that Beyonce and millions of her fans have jilted, some men are IRREPLACEABLE!!!

Men like the late Hon. Justice Lawal Uwais, JSC.

Although he delivered many judgments, I will focus on the judgments that are UNPRECEDENTED AND IRREPLACEABLE!!!

In no particular order, the five (5) cases are as follows:

  1. Alegbe v. Oloyo (1983) Vol. 14, N.S.C.C. page 315. This year makes it 42 years since this judgment was delivered. And ever since then in the history of the Supreme Court of Nigeria, no judge has been courageous enough to deliver a similar judgment!!!. In a nutshell, the Supreme Court of Nigeria as per Uwais, JSC held that the then Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1979 authorises the Speaker to declare as vacant the seat of the Appellant, a law-maker of the Bendel State House of Assembly due his absence (without just cause) for a period less than one-third of the total number of sittings of the said House of Assembly (which is 181 days)!!! Since the return to Nigeria’s nascent democracy in the year 1999, the only instances wherein Speakers have declared vacant the seat of any legislator due to absenteeism are the 2025 incident at the Zamfara State House of Assembly and sometime ago at the Edo State House of Assembly. Political solutions were later deployed to settle these matters. Two years ago, in a legislative lawyers’ journal, I authored an article wherein I published the attendance register of the Delta State House of Assembly to show which members had met the 181-day attendance requirement. The Clerk and the members were so furious at me, it is only by a miracle of the Almighty that I am still alive after the attacks from that incident!!! A piece of information that is supposed to be public knowledge to guide voters and the electorate about the performance of the legislators whom they voted for is now what is treated as highly confidential and classified information!!! For my own safety, the Clerk at the National Assembly refused to share with me a copy of the attendance register!!! Uwais JSC was courageous enough to do justice by supporting the expulsion by the Speaker of the said legislator of the then Bendel State House of Assembly for his failure to satisfy the 181 days attendance requirement!!! In contrast, in the Supreme Court judgment of 28th February 2025, another Justice of the Supreme Court looks for technicalities to justify the deviant action of 27 law-makers of the Rivers State House of Assembly!!!
  2. State Vs. Ilori (1983) N.S.C.C. 69 . The scope of the power of the Attorney-General’s power to discontinue a criminal trial (Noelle Prosequi) was the subject matter of this case arising from the exercise of the said power by the then Attorney-General of Lagos State!!! Uwais JSC made the point that this power of the Attorney-General is not a licence for self-aggrandisement but this discretion must be exercised in the OVER-RIDING PUBLIC INTEREST!!! Recently, we are witnessing a situation wherein the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) of the Federation is exercising this power in the interest of two individuals and not in the OVER-RIDING PUBLIC INTEREST!!!
  3. Ukaegbu vs. Attorney-General of Imo State (1983) 14 N.S.C.C. Uwais JSC laid down the rule that private individuals and Non-governmental Organisations (NGOs) have a right to establish private universities!!!
  4. Attorney-General of Bendel State vs. Attorney-General of the Federation (1981) 12 N.S.C.C. 314_Uwais, JSC and others laid down the precedent that failure of any piece of legislation to comply with ALL THE STAGES OF THE LAW-MAKING PROCESS as laid down in the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria would mean that such a piece of legislation would be declared null and void and inconsistent with Section 4(8) of the then 1979 Nigerian Constitution. Even though the Attorney-General of the Federation tried to argue that the said Money Bill of 1980 complied with the provisions of the Acts Authentication Act, 1961, his Lordship, Uwais held that the provisions of the Nigerian Constitution that regulate law-making process are superior to the Acts Authentication Act, 1961 and must therefore be strictly complied with!!!
  5. Adesanya vs. President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (1981) N.S.C.C. 145 on the issue of locus standi, Uwais, JSC “emphasised the need to strike a fair equilibrium between the requirements of access to justice and the need to discourage meddlesome interlopers, busy-bodies and professional litigants from litigating over matters which do not directly affect them”

From the foregoing, it is crystal clear that Uwais, JSC is IRREPLACEABLE and unfortunately, his generation of courageous, morally and ethically upright Nigerian jurists are slowly giving way to a new generation of jurists that only time would tell their ideological or pecuniary leanings!!!

CJN Uwais was known for his extreme frugality and accountability—Agbakoba, SAN

My Lord Justice Muhammed Lawal Uwais was a gentleman par excellence!!!

He came to the Supreme Court at a very early age and became one of the longest-serving Justices of the Supreme Court, and finally translated as Chief Justice of the Federation.

He was a member of the old school of Supreme Court Justices and in very good company with Aniagolu Eso Idigbe Obaseki Nnamani Oputa JJSC, etc.

CJN Uwais was known for his extreme frugality and accountability with Judicial Funds, once returning 5 billion Naira to the Federal coffers.

It was my great pleasure to appear before him, and his passing is a great loss.

I express my deepest condolences to Maryam Uwais and all of the Family on the loss of the CJN.

May his memory be a blessing as his Lordship rests eternally

Dr Olisa Agbakoba SAN

‘He lived a full and fulfilled life’, Asiwaju Awomolo SAN pays tribute to Chief Justice Uwais

Hon. Justice Mohammed Lawal Uwais GCON, today, a holy day in the spiritual realm, slept to wake no more into this world of toils.

He was one of the few justices of this country that served longest in the Supreme Court of Nigeria. He ended as the Chief of Justice of Nigeria ,with many more years than anyone before him.

He served with integrity, dignity, honour, and faithfully in accordance with his judicial oath. He left a judiciary who was respected and trusted by most Nigerians. He is gone, but his words will, for many decades, guide judicial decisions.

I can proudly say that I had the privilege of arguing many cases before panels of the Supreme Court, where he presided, and whether I won or lost, I was satisfied that he was not corrupted.

He was deep in the knowledge of the law,courageously espoused it, very gentle and humorous.

He encouraged young lawyers to be their best, including me, to take Silk, even at the age of 15 years at the Bar and I became. God bless his gentle soul.

As Chairman of Chairmen and Secretaries of the 47 branches of the NBA, the Committees that restored the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) to life in 1996-1998, his counsel were invaluable.

He respected the bar as a big partner in the administration of justice. He was humble but bold in expressing his thoughts and beliefs. He was a great leader, father, and friend.

As Chairman Body of Benchers, I and a few Benchers visited him very recently to seek his views about how to train Nigerian lawyers for the global market tomorrow. He was forthright and clear in his thoughts for the need to effect major changes in the content of training lawyers for today and tomorrow.

He lived a full and fulfilled life.

I will never forget that he and his bosom friend and brother, the late Alhaji Abdullahi Ibrahim SAN.CON shared lunch with my family in my home. That was a great unforgettable honour ,

Abdullahi Ibrahim passed before him, and if there are opportunities to meet again in heaven, they would meet to part no more as friends, brothers, and confidants.

He gave his best to Nigeria and his passing should remind all of us still in the service of God, as Justices and lawyers, that someday we will pass and give account to the Most High, the most merciful God, for how we served, like Hon Justice Mohammadu Lawal Uwais did.

May God comfort his wives, particularly Mariam,our learned friend, and all the children of the family. May Allah remember his faithful services to humanity and grant him Aljana firdausi.

Adegboyega Awomolo SAN.
Past Chairman BoB.

Tributes Continue to Pour: Enugu to immortalise music icon, Mike Ejeagha

  • He was a guardian of Igbo oral tradition — Atiku

The government of Enugu State on Saturday announced plans to immortalise the ‘Gwo gwo gwo ngwo’ belter and legendary Nigerian music icon, Gentleman Mike Ejeagha, while expressing sadness over his death.

The revered folklorist and cultural ambassador passed away on Friday, leaving behind a monumental legacy in the nation’s music history.

In a post on his verified X platform on Saturday, Mbah highlighted Ejeagha’s contributions to Nigerian culture and his ability to transform simple indigenous folktales into universally resonant songs.

“Mike Ejeagha was a legend, a cultural ambassador, and a revered son of Enugu State.

“He was one of the finest musicians of his generation, with an easygoing personality and a humility that belied his towering celebrity status.

“His fan-base transcended boundaries, and he was easily one of the most recognisable voices in music”, Mbah said.

The governor further acknowledged Ejeagha’s unique artistic genius, saying “Ejeagha’s immense talent and genius lay in how he took simple indigenous folktales and turned them into unforgettable songs that resonate across cultures.”

Mbah also lamented the significant void left by his passing, describing it as a loss not only for his immediate family but also for Enugu State, the entire music community, and the nation as a whole.

“His death leaves a huge void that will be difficult to fill. But the legacies he has left behind will last a lifetime,” Mbah emphasised in his post.

On behalf of the Enugu State Government, Mbah extended heartfelt condolences to the Ejeagha family, assuring them of unwavering support during this difficult time.

The governor also pledged that the state government would ensure that the memory of the music legend is “duly immortalised.”

The post concluded with a prayer for the family, “Above all, I pray that his family experiences the comforting grace of God’s love, and the fortitude to bear the loss. Rest in peace, Gentleman Mike Ejeagha.”

Mike Ejeagha was celebrated for a career spanning decades, during which he championed Igbo folklore and proverbs through his captivating highlife music.

His distinctive storytelling through song earned him a cherished place in the hearts of millions and a significant position in Nigeria’s rich cultural heritage.

Also, ex-Vice President Atiku Abubakar mourned the passing of the highlife icon, describing him as a “storyteller, teacher, and guardian of Igbo oral tradition.”

Ejeagha, aged 95, died on Friday evening at around 8 p.m. at the 32 Garrison Hospital in Enugu after a prolonged illness.

His eldest son, Emma Ejeagha, confirmed the news to journalists on Saturday.

In a heartfelt tribute shared via his official social media handles, Atiku wrote, ”Gentleman Mike Ejeagha was more than a musician; he was a storyteller, a teacher, and a guardian of Igbo oral tradition.

“May his soul rest in perfect peace.”

Popularly called “Gentleman” for his calm demeanour and lyrical grace, Ejeagha was recently brought back into the public eye through a heartfelt visit by comedian and skit maker, Brain Jotter.

Brain Jotter and the legendary musician

The entertainer’s engagement with the ageing legend helped rekindle public appreciation for his work.

Atiku’s tribute partly read, ”It is heartwarming to note that thanks to Brain Jotter, highlife maestro Mike Ejeagha had his ‘Gwo gwo gwo ngwo’ encore dance before the curtain was drawn,” referencing his signature sound and the emotional wave of support that followed the viral visit.

Ejeagha celebrated for his folkloric lyrics, proverbs, and didactic storytelling style, is a towering figure in Nigerian music.

His influence spanned generations, with many of his songs serving as cultural touchstones in Igbo-speaking communities and beyond.

Ejeagha’s musical career, which spanned over six decades, produced a rich catalog of songs known for their deep wisdom, philosophical tone, and traditional instrumentation.

M. L. Uwais Library of J-K Gadzama LLP pays tribute to the Late Hon. Justice M. L. Uwais, GCON

  • As Supreme Court mourns the late Chief Justice

With profound sadness and immense reverence, the Mohammed L. Uwais Library of J-K Gadzama LLP mourns the passing of a towering jurist, a constitutional colossus, and a beacon of judicial integrity, the late Honourable Justice Mohammed Lawal Uwais, GCON, former Chief Justice of Nigeria.

At the venerable age of 89, Justice Uwais transitioned from this earthly realm on Friday in Abuja, leaving behind a legacy that will echo through the annals of Nigerian legal history for generations to come. His service to the Nigerian judiciary spanned decades, but it was his eleven-year tenure as Chief Justice of Nigeria from 1995 to 2006 that firmly etched his name in gold.

Justice Uwais was more than a judge. He was a visionary reformer, a principled statesman, and an intellectual of the highest order. Under his stewardship, the Supreme Court became a citadel of legal reasoning, courage, and independence. He led with quiet dignity and spoke through his judgments, eloquent, piercing, and always anchored in justice.

Beyond the bench, his leadership of the Electoral Reform Committee further revealed his unflinching commitment to democratic ideals. His report, often cited as a roadmap to credible elections, showed a jurist unafraid to challenge the status quo for the greater good of the nation.

The Mohammed L. Uwais Library, bearing his name, stands as a testament to his dedication to legal scholarship and the advancement of jurisprudence. We are deeply honored to carry his legacy forward, one built not on personal glory, but on tireless service to justice and the rule of law.

To those of us privileged to study his life and work, Justice Uwais was the embodiment of quiet brilliance, ethical fortitude, and unfaltering patriotism. His passing leaves a void that cannot be filled, but his legacy lights the path for all who believe in the nobility of the law.

Our thoughts are with his family, the Nigerian Bar and Bench, and the nation he served with such distinction. May his noble soul find rest among the righteous.

Adieu, Justice Mohammed Lawal Uwais.

Your light shall never dim.

JOINTLY SIGNED BY: Chief J-K Gadzama SAN (Founding Principal Partner) & John A. Nwafor, Ph.D, CLN, AESM, ITIL (Librarian)

The Supreme Court of Nigeria, where he served as the 9th Chief Justice, has also expressed its condolences to the family of His Lordship, who passed away in the early hours of Friday, June 6, 2025.

This was contained in a press statement signed by the Director of Information and Public Relations of the Supreme Court of Nigeria, Dr Festus Akande.

The late Justice Uwais was the CJN from 1995 until his retirement in 2006, leaving behind a formidable legacy of judicial excellence and integrity, the statement noted.

Born on June 12, 1936 in Zaria, Kaduna State, Justice Uwais embarked on a remarkable journey in the legal profession.

He was called to the Bar at the Middle Temple, London, in 1963 and quickly earned a reputation for his commitment to justice and fairness.

Over the decades, he held numerous influential positions within and outside the judiciary.

During his tenure as the CJN, he championed judicial reforms aimed at improving the administration of justice in Nigeria.

He was also instrumental in establishing the National Judicial Council, which plays a critical role in maintaining the independence and integrity of the judiciary.

The statement further noted that Justice Uwais was dedicated to advancing legal education and served as a mentor to many young lawyers and judges.

“The Supreme Court of Nigeria expresses its deepest condolences to the family of Justice Muhammadu Uwais, during this moment of grief.

“We honour his tireless dedication to the rule of law and the improvement of the Nigerian judiciary—values for which he will always be remembered.

“Hon. Justice Uwais’s professional achievements and unwavering commitment to justice have had a lasting impact on Nigeria’s legal landscape.

“He will be sorely missed by colleagues, friends, and the many lives he touched throughout his career,” the statement added.

TIPS