Home Blog Page 1335

FG Lacks the Sincerity and Capacity to Successfully Implement CAMA – Pastor Wole Oladiyun

The Senior Pastor of the Christ Livingspring Apostolic Ministry (CLAM), Omole, Lagos, Pastor Wole Oladiyun, has expressed concern that the 2020 CAMA Legislation is susceptible to abuse and manipulation by the corrupt and dishonest public service system Nigeria runs.

According to the critically acclaimed minister of God, the Church as a collective entity in Nigeria does not trust the government, hence the barrage of criticisms that heralded the signing of the 2020 CAMA legislation by President Muhammadu Buhari on August 7.

While featuring on The Podium Medias Instagram Personality Interview Series – ON THE PODIUM – via @thepodiummediaonline, Pastor Oladiyun said: “The church does not trust the government; what they want to do, the intention is good because this is already being done in the developed world where the systems are purposefully structured to do that. CLAM has prayer centres in the UK and USA, so we know the rules and regulations. But I have gone through the CAMA Law, and I regret to say that Nigerians will not be honest with its implementation”.

According to him, CAMA will be a tool of vendetta and revenge by government officials. “If the people in government see that a particular church is criticizing government even if it is the truth, they will use the CAMA Law to finish the church. Also, the Government does not have the network and the capacity to manage and successfully implement the law. And if they want to do it the way the Charity Commission operates in the UK, I do not see the right level of honesty in our leaders. It is not going to work”.

He says his concern about the CAMA Law being abused and manipulated is not entirely misplaced because government officials are already talking and acting in a way that suggests that there is a premeditated agenda to gag the Church and stigmatise church leaders.

““I read a publication where they said any organisation that does not obey CAMA Law is doomed. They are already fanning the embers of war. It should not be so. They should make it transparent. When they want to look at NGOs, including churches, they must do it holistically and objectively. It must involve churches, mosques, and even traditional worshippers – the Sango and Ogun worshippers. Let them go to their shrines and tell them to obey CAMA law”, he added.

He said the body of Christ would collectively fight and resist CAMA because there is no honesty or sincerity in its implementation.

Pastor Oladiyun rebuffed insinuations that churches are protesting against CAMA because they do not want to be accountable and transparent in their financial dealings. That is totally untrue, he said, adding: “In CLAM, for instance, we have nothing to fear. Every year, we audit our books and file all necessary returns. So, we are not new to accountability and transparency. My fear and concern is that the Federal Government has no structure to sustain the effective implementation of the law”, he clarified.

He also rejected criticisms that ministers of God have become politicians with their incessant comments on government and governance in the country. ” I am not a politician, but I am an activist. I want things to get better in Nigeria. I will not relent in calling on government officials to do the right thing. Nobody can cajole me. This country belongs to all of us, and I have the right to air my views as loudly as I can. I have always used the pulpit to exhort those in positions of authority to please do the right thing. Nigeria is too blessed to be poor and stranded”.

thepodiummedia

El-Rufa’i, NBA and court order

El-Rufai

On August 21, the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) sent a letter to the Governor of Kaduna state, Mallam Nasiru El-Rufa’i, indicating his withdrawal as NBA2020 conference speaker. The governor was billed to speak on the topic “Who is a Nigerian? The letter generated a lot of controversy from different angles of the country, especially among the Nigerians that were spending significant time on social media expressing their views on national issues of interest.

According to the NBA president, the invitation was withdrawn from the governor following a petition by some lawyers under the aegis of Open Bar Initiative following rising killings in Southern Kaduna.

Well, writing on this kind of issue ends up with different interpretations, no wonder sometimes I find it very disturbing and difficult to press my keyboards on any stuff that may generate comments if not anger to many people, especially those that are not in line with the author`s stand. Permit me to clarify this to you that I am neither a supporter of Mallam El-Rufa’i nor his sympathiser. In fact, I have issues with some of his strict and anti-masses policies but we have no option than voice out our opinion, especially on any issue capable of downsizing democracy, human rights and the rule of law in the country.

Let me start with this, the NBA as an association has the right to invite or withdraw invitation to anybody in their program because they are the organisers of the program and therefore have the right to select the guests for the program.

Be that as it may, I have personally not seen anything wrong in Inviting someone to a program and withdrawing same. What makes the issue create unnecessary attention among the general members of the public is the issue of allegations against the governor in relation to rising cases of attacks in Southern Kaduna. The NBA president stated that the withdrawal of the governor`s invitation has nothing to do with religion or ethnicity.

Whatever he said, the majority will find it very offensive, especially those that hold the opinion that the association’s approach was very poor and uncalled for, the association failed to give the governor a fair hearing, which is one of the cardinal principals of the rule of law. The governor is presumed innocent of the said allegation till a court pronounces him guilty. The views of some members of the association shouldn’t be the basis to withdraw such invitation unless the association wants it. 

This is just like teenagers’ prank we had back in university days that you send your party invitations to some people and still give words to bouncers not to allow them to gain entry just to humiliate them at the entrance then you later apologise to them. NBA apologiding to the governor simply means that the association is not convinced withdrawing the invite was right or affirming my thought on the above mentioned issues

There are a lot of conspiracies surrounding the matter. Religious and tribal champions are busy giving the incident different interpretations and inclinations but I perceive the whole melodrama ensued between NBA and El-Rufa’i as part of the 2023 political game. If not for political reason, why will the NBA allow other speakers like Wike and Obasanjo? Are they saying they have history of obeying court orders?

If NBA is concerned on the killings in Southern Kaduna, they will not have entitled the theme of the conference “Am I a Nigerian-A debate on National Identity”, instead, they should have opted for “The Indigeneship-Citizenship Conundrum”  to make fool out of him. It will be a very good avenue for people to dig deep by asking unhidden agenda and questions some people think about him. This will also pave way for them to understand why the governor has issues with Southern Kaduna leaders. But the association denied all these opportunities to their members and general public just because of the interest of insignificant few among them.

Now their attitude towards El-Rufa’i is creating a different narrative among the fragile country`s ethno-religious population; a significant number of the population are turning the saga as an issue of ethno-religious sentiment. El-Rufai`s presence in the conference will not benefit the common Nigerian with anything but will definitely bring out different stories especially on the current crisis in the state. 

In addition, NBA’s reactions to such issue that has colouration of religious is nothing but fuelling the disintegration among the major religions in the country, especially now that everything in Nigeria one must put religious and tribal sentiments for such things to attract attention.
Moreover, the NBA has directed the Muslim lawyer to nominate another Muslim governor to speak in the event. This has indicated that NBA and their sponsors have an axe to grind with El-Rufa’i. The NBA, which is the body of learned and a rallying point and unifying factor, has derailed from this core objective. What a shame!

A lot of negative narrations are going on daily in Nigeria from Mailafia`s allegations to another. All these will not let us understand the major challenges facing the country like insecurity, poor democratic governance, abject poverty and unemployment that have become the order of the day in the country.

Nigerians should be conscious of the issues that can castigate one another and lead us to unnecessary conflict that may result in further loss of lives and destruction of property. Few unpatriotic individuals and organisations try to use unhidden agenda and conspiracies to divide us for their personal interest.

Mohammed, a democratic governance enthusiast, writes from Funtua, Katsina state.

blueprint.

Video: I sent Yar’adua to grave, Jonathan to Otuoke, El-Rufai boasts

Kaduna State Governor, Malam Nasir El-Rufai during a statewide broadcast of June 9, 2020 610

The Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai has said that he is not afraid of attack from anyone.

Governor El-Rufai said that he dispatched two former Nigeria presidents who attacked him.

He said one is dead and the other is out of office.

https://youtu.be/YM9YzfN8Mq4

El-Rufai made boast shortly after the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) withdrew the invitation extended to him as guest speaker in the forthcoming NBA virtual annual general conference.

Governor el-Rufai had wept and lamented that NBA denied him fairing-hearing in the matter.

He noted that he accepted the invitation of the NBA to participate in a panel discussion on national identity as part of his commitment to the evolution of a national consensus, nothing more.

Disinvited

Sam Omatseye

THIS is not the time to hold grudges against Malam Nasir El-Rufai. It is not the time to say he, like Napoleon, suffers a small man’s syndrome, or that he pulled down the homes of rivals. It is not the time to say his mind has not grown above his height, and that he does not deserve to speak about who is a Nigerian.

So, some avatars of liberty will say the Nigerian Bar Association railed against the three Johns of thinkers: Locke, Mill, Rousseau. They invited him to their conference only to disinvite him. The man salivated over an empty table. They probably did that because the man has a sour tongue, a fratricidal impulse, pitches tribe against tribe and, in the vexed issue of southern Kaduna, El-Rufai has taken sides, and has anointed violence against peace.

If anything, the man on the democratic throne in Kaduna is a Nigerian. He is Nigerian enough to confess that he is Fulani, and he is honest enough to say that he wants to go after the Christian leaders in southern Kaduna who have lashed him over his sectarian furies.

We can also forgive him for poor memory. Maybe he forgot that when the region raged a few years ago, he confessed he paid Fulani hordes to silence them. He paid with the nation’s taxpayer’s money. He confessed they were the goons of evil, the machete-happy brutes whose eyes blared with human blood. Like harmattan fires, they brushed through the homesteads and farms of their quarries. They barbequed fathers, roasted mothers, turned farms into a dark, frescoed mural of bonfires. They haunted huts, glamorised houses in smoulders, prostrated schools, littered a litany of streets with disembodied limbs. In echoes of the 1960’s pogrom, they grinned so others may scream; maniacal glee over gleams of blood.

The governor has many matters on his mind, so he could not remember. Hence he says he will unveil the leaders who begged to swap gift for peace in southern Kaduna. His morality may not be balanced because his power of revenge dwarfs his power of recall. He read law, and maybe his history is famished. Something foul happened to his mnemonic faculty. When he was minister, he said he knew the marauders. Now, he says he is gathering material on rampaging Christians. How time flies from memory. He has lost the power of the past. He is obliterating his own past. Maybe he did not want to forget. Fate tampered with his cerebellum.

If the Christian leaders want money, does that cancel the carnage going on? Is he not saying Christian leaders set their own people on fire? He has no evidence. He said it for the headline. He craves public spotlight. Hence he is bitter that the NBA disinvited him. No need to fume with the man. El-Rufai is at war with El-Rufai.

He loves attention, and does he not deserve it? Nothing wrong with vanity. After all, one of the world’s great actors, Al Pacino, says, “vanity is my favorite sin.” Except that El-Rufai can never admit it is a sin.

He won governorship election twice. The people must love him. He is so democratic that he loves one set of people against another. One plus one equals one, apology to Dostoyevsky’s novel of ideas, Man from the Underground. For him, it means Fulani plus Fulani equals Kaduna S  tate. Or Fulani plus Muslim equals Kaduna State. So, for him, Kaduna is one, and it is Fulani. One is majority. Of what use are the over 30 nationalities in southern Kaduna? They may be many but less than one and Kaduna is just one. Maybe 30 are like the Biblical tower of babel, and his tribe bestows peace to his ears than the cacophony of variety.

Recently he said the presidency should go south. He who damned the south of Kaduna and dispensed with the Christians for reelection? He said he wanted a Muslim/Fulani as deputy and implied the Christians could go to hell. The fires of hell are alive in southern Kaduna.

His ticket went to heaven and won. So the same man wants presidency to go south, and anyone is taking him seriously? He is a closet comedian. If he cannot accept Non-Fulani on his ticket at home, why would he want it in Nigeria? So, when the NBA says they don’t want him to define who a Nigerian is, we deprived him a good platform to amuse us.

Theorists of liberty often clash with the concept of decency. It’s like Paul’s assertion, “Shall we continue in sin so that grace may bound?” Shall we allow El-Rufai to defile decency, so free speech may abound? The NBA says, Nigeria forbid. The thing is, he is immune to Lai Mohammed’s hate speech law.

But El-Rufai wanted NBA as a way to push for balance, to confess Nigeria, but act Fulani. The classic hypocrite. The hegemonist as inclusionist. The people of southern Kaduna want to be at peace. They may not always be innocent when the settlers lay claim to their own soils. But they should not be displaced because a governor separates memory from peace. He should not be a rabble-rouser as leader when the rabble has lost its temper. Men like him give peaceful Fulani-Muslims a bad name.

El-Rufai backs a southern president in order to be vice president. If the ticket wins, he may not wait three months to toss hot coal under the president’s seat and whip up headlines.

His concept of society is caste. He does not want equality. He touts it until he flouts it. He wanted a Christian beside him in the first term and Muslim afterwards. He remembered he gave money to appease the plunderers before he forgot.

He is like what Historian Isabel Wilkerson is saying in her new book, Caste: the origins of our discontent. It looks at how racism in America is like a caste system. That is how El-Rufai is looking at the folks in southern Kaduna. He is saying to the over 30 tribes to “keep to your caste,” in the words of Emile Bronte in Jane Eyre. That is his concept of who is a Nigerian.

He should know we run a republican constitution, and he may sit on the governor’s throne today. But as Victor Hugo quips in his novel, Les Miserables, “A chair is not a caste.”

How I Escaped From Police Custody – Ibadan Serial Killer

Ibadan Serial Killer, Sunday Shodipe.

Ibadan serial killer, Sunday Shodipe, has narrated how he escaped from Mokola Police Station in Ibadan, the Oyo State capital last Tuesday.

The Ibadan serial killer said the police officer warned him not to make any attempt to escape while taking his bath.

Speaking further, the Ibadan serial killer said he was not even thinking of running away at that point. He disclosed that he finally escaped when he saw that the officer was engrossed in a discussion with another person and not paying attention to him.

His words: “The new female DPO asked officer Funsho to allow me take my bath. He cautioned me not to try to escape when I am taking my bath.

“I escaped when I saw him discussing with another person. I climbed the borehole pole and jumped the fence. The people living in the area saw me when I escaped but they did not raise any alarm.”

The suspect had killed about eight people, mainly women at Akinyele Local Government Area of Oyo State.

How Buhari can end Southern Kaduna, Northern Nigeria security challenges – Shehu Sani

In order to stem the violence and other security challenges bedeviling the northern part of the country, Senator Shehu Sani, has called on President Muhammadu Buhari to organise a conference to be led by former Heads of States, Generals Yakubu Gowon and Abdulsalam Abubakar.

He also said to know the real problem of Southern Kaduna and the way out of the security challenges, President Buhari should invite stakeholders from the region, and also setup a Presidential Committee to be led by the likes of General Martin Agwai, Col. Dangiwa Umar, Sen. Makarfi, among others.

Sani disclosed this in an interview with journalists in Jos, the Plateau State capital.

“These stakeholders conference should resolve with a template on what we intend to achieve in the next 10 to 20 years”, he explained.

“The resolution of such conference should be institutionalised in all the States in Northern Nigeria.

I think this is very important”, he maintained.

“This includes finding a solution to banditry and violence in the North-West, the Tiv-Jukun violence between Benue and Taraba States, the perennial crisis of religious violence in Plateau State, finding a solution to what is happening in Southern Kaduna, and addressing the minority issues and religious disharmony that exist between Muslims and Christians.

“I think there is nobody that is properly placed that should be empowered by all the 19 northern states and the Federal Government to lead a retreat or a conference of all northern leaders, irrespective of their political affiliation to find solution to these problems, like Generals Gowon, Abubakar; Elder Paul Onongo, Lema Jibril and others, can all come together and fine solution to these problems.

“We need to have a working document for peace, order, unity and end to our religious crisis and security challenges in northern Nigeria.

Speaking on the security challenges bedeviling Southern Kaduna, Sani who represented Kaduna Central in the Senate from 2015 to 2019, said, “the first thing the President needs to do is to give an audience to the people of Southern Kaduna.

“Invite their elders, political leaders, youths and women, selected from all the LGAs and communities in Southern Kaduna, and meet with Mr President, and listen to the problems of the area, and find solution to it.

According to him, “The next thing the President needs to do about Southern Kaduna; is to set up a presidential committee of not more than 6 to 7 people, which will include people like Col. Dangiwa Umar, Lawal Jafaru Isah, Senator Makarfi, General Martin Agwai, and some few others who have been able to achieve a lot in terms of restoring peace and order in Southern Kaduna.

“A Presidential Committee comprising of these people would be able to give the president a realistic objective and fair assessment of practical steps that are needed to solve the problem.

“One of the reasons why the problem in Southern Kaduna cannot be solved, is that, the President only listens to the governor, and the governor and the people of Southern Kaduna are at par with each other.

“How can you solve that kind of problem? He asked.

“So, the names I have mentioned, I believe have ideas to contribute to the efforts that are aimed at finding a lasting solution to the problems of that region.

He, however, warned that, “We should also not confuse the problem in Southern Kaduna; the killings in Southern Kaduna are perpetuated by bandits and terrorists, raiding villages, raping women, killing children, displacing people; is different from 3 to 4 decades of religious violence between Muslims and Christians, that should not be confused.

“Because what people are trying to do now, is to say the killings are reprisals or vendetta or revenge, they are not revenge”, he stressed.

“No Muslim has killed a Christian, and no Christian is killing any Muslim for now. It is terrorists that are targeting the people of Southern Kaduna and killing them. So, people shouldn’t bring what happened in the last 3 to 4 decades, and try to justify, a pure terrorists’ activity in that part of the state. That is my own view on that.”

newspotng

UNILAG: Visitation Panel, ASUU And The Brand’’– Martins Oloja

Inside Stuff With MARTINS OLOJA

It is indeed delightful to note that the Visitor to the University of Lagos, President Mohammed Buhari has responded timely to calls by different stakeholders for resolution of the crisis that has threatened to dent the brand equity of the great university.

Specifically, bowing to strong calls from ASUU, among others, the federal government at the weekend directed the Pro-Chancellor and Chairman of Council of the University of Lagos, Wale Babalakin, and Vice-Chancellor, Prof. Oluwatoyin Ogundipe to recuse themselves from official duties, pending the outcome of the Special Visitation Panel set up by president. The decision at was contained in a press statement signed by Director press, Federal Ministry of Education, Ben Goong. Babalakin’s Governing Council had, on August 12, sacked Professor Ogundipe as Vice-Chancellor over alleged financial recklessness and misconduct. Ogundipe, however, rejected the Council’s decision, saying the University’s due process had not been followed. The senate of the University, the school’s alumni, and ASUU also issued statements condemning Babalakin’s Council’s action, which they say did not follow due process. Babalakin in several media appearances, insisted he followed due process in removing Professor Ogundipe as Vice Chancellor. The university’s Registrar and Secretary to the Council had also signed some documents in media advertisement, detailing some contract scandals by the management. The University of Lagos, Visitation Panel members are: Professor Tukur Sa’ad – Chairman, Barrister Victor Onuoha, Professor Ikenna Oyindo, Professor Ekanem Braide, Professor Adamu K. Usman, Chief Jimoh Bankole, and Barrister Grace Ekanem Secretary – are to conclude work within two weeks.

Let us not get it twisted, the brand reputation I have been talking about is a serious critical factor in business, bureaucracy, politics, diplomacy and personal life. We need to build and preserve our reputation, reputation of our governance institutions, our organisations (secular and religious) if we want to be taken seriously. Brand reputation refers to how a particular brand (whether for an individual or a company or organization, is viewed by others. A favourable brand reputation means consumers trust your company, your service and feel good about purchasing your goods and services.

So, as I was saying, brand reputation, we hardly recognise here, is critical to growing a business. A positive brand equity builds loyalty and increases customer confidence in your brand and product, ultimately driving sales and bottom-line growth. This critical success factor is more important than anything else in marketing communication. If well handled, it positions you as a leader in your space.

This is not a module or a master class on brand reputation management. I just want us to recognise why I refrained from blaming anyone here last week for the crisis at the University of Lagos set up in 1962 as a national university. I know the importance of preserving and guarding reputation. Preserving the reputation of the university means value to all the teachers and old students of the university wherever they go. Let me repeat a story Professor Akin Oyebode used to illustrate the reputation of the University of Lagos at a Brand Management colloquium organised by the University of Lagos, Mass Communication Department Alumni Association (UMCAA) in March 2019.

Specifically, the proactive University of Lagos Mass Communication Alumni Association (UMCAA) had on Thursday March 21 organised its 2019 “Distinguished Lecture Series” titled, ‘Brand Nigeria: Ignite’. The keynote speaker, Akin Oyebode, a retired Law Professor of the University of Lagos who modified the title to read, ‘Re-branding Nigeria: A Quixotic Task?’ spoke to the theme, in any case. The professor of international law and jurisprudence said the first time he appreciated the essence of brand reputation was the time the authorities in Abuja in 2012 proposed to rename the iconic University of Lagos after Moshood Abiola as Moshood Abiola University – from UNILAG to MAU. He disclosed to the audience that a Nigerian doctoral student had in Oxford University, U.K cornered him then and told him after participating in a conference at the University (Oxford) that if they succeeded in changing the University of Lagos UNILAG to MAU they would have ruined his own brand reputation from the University of Lagos where he obtained his first class degree in Political Science, which had earned him a direct entry for a doctorate degree in Oxford. Professor Oyebode said the student then asked him to tell the authorities of the University of Lagos then to reject the blighter and brand destroyer called MAU. The rest is history as the President Jonathan administration dropped the idea when the University administration and the alumni power won the day to preserve the brand reputation.

I was part of a three-man discussion panel of the Oyebode’s keynote at the event chaired by Sir Steve Bamidele Omojafor at the main hall of the University. The two other discussants were Oluyinka Esan, an UMCAA member, former lecturer Mass Communication Department, Unilag and now a professor, Media Studies at the University College, Winchester, U.K and Odion Aleobua, also UMCAA member and a Marketing Communications expert, founder and CEO, MODION, formerly of OANDO and Forte Oil.

Professor Oyebode’s brief encounter on brand management of University of Lagos at the Oxford University, another global brand, underscores the fact that most times, our leaders and managers lack understanding that our actions and utterances can destroy our brand reputation and years later we spend billions of our meager resources to organise damage control, which most times, doesn’t restore much to the factory setting (of reputation). This was the point I tried to make last week while appealing the gladiators in Unilag to avoid actions that could destroy the reputation of the university already noted by the authorities at the Oxford and Cambridge. There are still several universities in Nigeria, which enjoy such brand reputation even in developed countries, despite all odds. Brand reputation is the pulling power and the only reason most of our people struggle to send their children to certain universities in Europe and North America. Brand equity is the reason some people decide to subsume their universities under a few months certificate programmes in Harvard, Oxford, Cambridge, MIT, Yale in their curriculum vitae and bio data. And here is the thing, we should invest robustly in infrastructure and superstructure that will enhance brand reputation of our institutions, agencies, our states and our country.

As Professor Oyebode noted at the colloquium, the many well-equipped libraries at the Harvard Law School, in Boston alone can be intimidating as a brand builder. His seminal presentation at that UMCAA colloquium underscores the fact that as a nation-state, Nigeria could use ‘considerable re-configuration, re-ordering or rebranding, especially on account of the country’s bad press internationally and gruesome image as the habitat of the world’s ugly Nigerian’.

So, if we must re-brand Nigeria and institutions therein, we must align with the understanding that there must be a conscious efforts at investing in rebranding. To develop a university or our agency or product like consumer brands, we must invest heavily in research and development (R&D). As noted at that UMCAA seminar, Apple Corporation was estimated to have spent $14.7 billion on R&D in 2018 and almost 50% of Nigeria’s 2018 Annual Budget of $29.8 billion.

As I had noted here on March 24, for me, Nigeria is still a hard sell partly because its leaders de-market the country with pronouncements on corruption and insurgency. So the only brand equity we have stems from corruption and insecurity, as Boko Haram too has a brand equity – associated with Nigeria. The president himself goes to the United Nations to tell the world about the brand – corruption. He does not tell us how to fix critical infrastructure such as the national shame called Apapa Ports – located in the economic capital of West Africa, Lagos, ‘centre of mediocrity’ renamed ‘centre of excellence’. But is there a more excellent place than Lagos in Nigeria? That is why we need to get all of us to sit down to develop a strategy to ignite the Re-branding Nigeria, the brand the black people of the world have been waiting for.

So, the lessons from the University of Lagos current crisis should be noted by the authorities of the University and in Abuja where they always influence membership of Governing Councils and where they help all sorts of characters to be Vice Chancellors. The first lesson for Abuja is that the University of Lagos is not the only public university that intrigues, corruption, vested interests and even cabals have threatened to ruin.

Despite the paucity of funds allocated to the public universities, things could be better with proper and prudent management. The fact that most public universities including those offering computer science and engineering cannot migrate to e-learning platforms at this moment should be probed. It may not be due to funding problems alone. It is curious to note that most tertiary institution managers should visit Nigeria’s first College of Education, Adeyemi College of Education, Ondo where an immediate past Provost, Professor Olukoya Ogen caused even Fibre Optic cable to be laid inside the campus for the purpose of building digital facilities the College now uses for e-procurement, e-learning and e-election. If a degree awarding College of Education can do that in Ondo, why not public universities, according to the proportion of their budget?

So, the federal and state governments should not always dismiss complaints and protests from ASUU members. They are knowledgeable and critical stakeholders, no matter how cantankerous we perceive them to be. They as teachers and public intellectuals, deserve more respect. They know their associates who are corrupt and indolent. They know the university administrations that are corrupt and wasteful.

Meanwhile, the Senate of the University of Lagos should stand up for recognition for their resilience in this crisis. The senate was resourceful: They sent a print copy of their resolution on the crisis to the Visitor/President, the Minister of Education and the National Universities Commission in Abuja. The University of Lagos Senate deserves a garland of honour while the sacked Acting Vice Chancellor, Prof. T. Soyombo who wanted to benefit from some architecture he found in the ruins, deserves a censure. The deliverable from all this rigmarole here is that the president and governors should pay more attention to quality of education at all levels in Nigeria. They should be interested in the quality of corporate governance in tertiary institutions. If Nigerian scholars can’t be relied upon find solution to our problems, we can’t make progress. They should recognise tertiary institutions as solution and innovation centres.

newspotng

Ibadan Serial Killer Rearrested

Ibadan Serial Killer, Sunday Shodipe.

The Oyo tate Police Command has rearrested Sunday Shodipo, the suspected serial killer in Akinyele Local Government Area of the state.

Shodipe, 19, escaped from police custody barely a week ago.

The Public Relations Officer of Oyo Police Command, Olugbenga Fadeyi, confirmed the development.

He said details of the re-arrest would be made available shortly.

He confirmed the suspect has been kept in safer custody.

The Inspector-General of Police, Mohammed Adamu, last week sent in a crack team of detectives to complement the efforts of the officers of the command after Shodipe escaped from custody.

Oyo Commissioner of Police, Chuks Enwonwu, had placed a N500,000 bounty on the suspect.

US Indicts Five Nigerians In $300m ‘Sweepstakes’ Fraud

The United States department of justice has indicted five Nigerians in a $300 million sweepstakes fraudulent scheme.

A sweepstake is a race, gambling game or lottery in which the winnings comprise all the money that has been staked.

Harry Cole, a Nigerian based in Canada, was extradited to the US to face charges.

Other Nigerians indicted are Akintola Akinmadeyemi, Emmanuel Olawale Ajayi (aka Wale, aka Walata), Tony Dada Akinbobola (aka Lawrence D Awoniyi, aka Boss Tony, aka Toyin) and Bolaji Akinwunmi Oyewole (aka BJ, aka Beejay).

According to the US, Cole, also known as Akintomide Bolu, was extradited to the Western District of Texas where the alleged fraud was committed with other accomplices between 2012 and 2016.

“Harry Cole (aka Akintomide Ayoola Bolu, aka John King, aka Big Bro, aka Egbon), a 50-year-old Nigerian citizen and a resident of Canada, was extradited today from Canada to face federal charges for his alleged role in a fraudulent “sweepstakes” scheme with an intended loss in excess of $300 million,” it said in a statement.

“The defendants carried out their sweepstakes scheme from 2012 to 2016. Cole allegedly purchased lists from Lundy of elderly potential victims and their addresses. He and other conspirators based in the Toronto, Ontario Canada metropolitan area sent packages containing fraudulent sweepstakes information to conspirators residing in the US.

“The packages contained thousands of mailers, which US-based conspirators sent to victims notifying them that they had won sweepstakes. Each mailer included a fraudulent check issued in the name of the victim, usually in the amount of $8,000, and a pre-addressed envelope.

“Victims were instructed to deposit the check into their bank account, immediately withdraw between $5,000 and $7,000 dollars in cash or money orders and send the money to a “sweepstakes representative” to facilitate the victim collecting his or her prize.

“By the time the victim was notified by the bank that the deposited check was fraudulent, the cash or money order had been sent by the victim and received by the defendants or conspirators. The intended loss from this scheme was over $300 million, with an actual loss of more than $900,000.”

Commenting on the development, John Bash, US attorney, stated that if any American is defrauded the United States government will work tirelessly to find you, extradite you, and hold you accountable for your crimes.

thepodiummedia

TIPS