Home Blog Page 1319

Dino Melaye And The Critics Of His Lifestyle, By Dele Momodu

Fellow Nigerians, please permit me to make some quick clarifications. I’m not a Lawyer.

I’m not a Prosecutor. I do not work for EFCC, ICPC, SFU, CID, DSS, NIA or any of such organizations. I’m a journalist, a reporter, a columnist, a publisher, a social media addict, an author, etc, who is amazingly passionate about his career. Journalism happens to be the most flexible profession on planet earth. That is the reason anyone can be a media practitioner. There are infinite genres of journalism, including investigative, developmental, professional, lifestyles and entertainment, political, business, finance and so on. You can stretch this, ad infinitum.

I chose one niche only, Lifestyle and Entertainment, and decided to run with it. I leave it to the judgment of my fans and critics to decide whether I have made a success or failure of it. One fact is clear. Every soul has a choice of what to read or watch. If you visit any W. H. Smith Bookstore, in London, you will always be welcomed by an avalanche of books, newspapers and magazines and you would be spoilt for choice, if you’re a voracious reader like me. Please, endure my preamble. I’m not just a reporter, I’m trained to write. Armed with a Master’s degree in Literature-in-English, from the Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, I migrated to Lagos, in search of greener pastures in 1988. I was exceptionally lucky as fame and relative fortune smiled at me, sooner rather than later, not on a platter of gold but by dint of hard work. I’m a workaholic.

But I will not bore you with my comprehensive trajectories of journalistic conquests. I had to navigate and meander my ways through the labyrinth of a forest of a thousand daemons but at every stage I triumphed.

I was lucky to have had the traits of a typical Taurean. I’m a bull. I’m self-assured and very confident. I’m stubborn and stoical. I’m focused. No one can discourage me. I’m gentle but ready to pounce when threatened, or unnecessarily provoked. I have kept faith with my job. I enjoy every bit of it. I love my readers and fans. I try to tolerate those who come at me but respond whenever they cross the red line of abject ignorance. I must know that I understand the plight of some of my traducers. First, they do not understand my job but pretend to be experts, and you wonder why they can’t publish theirs, if so good. Then there are arrogant colleagues who discriminate against you for various reasons: Dele did not attend any journalism school; Dele hobnobs with the rich and famous; Dele made a fortune by praising corrupt Nigerians; and so on, all untrue, as I shall demonstrate, in a jiffy.

The first allegation is unfounded and baseless. You do not have to attend a journalism school before you can be regarded a reporter. The principal tool of media is language. It was the reason I was employed instantly by the Editor of the African Concord magazine, Mr Lewis Obi, in 1988. That was the reason I was selected as a pioneer staff of Weekend Concord in 1989, and enjoyed rapid and sporadic promotions from my Editor, Mr Mike Awoyinfa. It was the reason I gained the attention of our Managing Director, Dr Doyinsola Abiola, and our dear beloved Chairman, Chief Moshood Abiola. It was the reason I became the highest paid Editor at Classique magazine, in 1990, at the special invitation of Publisher, May Ellen Ezekiel Mofe Damijo. Same goes for my being appointed the pioneer Editor at Leaders & Company, in 1992, in what metamorphosed into Thisday newspapers, by Publisher, Prince Nduka Obaigbena. Each of these could not have been fluke.

Now imagine, how a self-professed journalism policeman wrote during my 60th birthday celebration that “Dele Momodu is not a journalist!” The man must have assumed that that was the best congratulatory message he could send to me on my special day. Such is the irresistible effect of hate and envy. I deliberately did not give him the attention he was seeking by not responding and will still not dignify him with a mention of his name.

I have suffered many such attacks from colleagues, friends, haters, and others for simply minding my business diligently, professionally, ethically and successfully. If there is any offense I have committed, it is my refusal to join them in mob journalism, media lynching, practicing entertainment journalism as opposed to bolekajanism, granting access to everyone whether saints or sinners, and so on. Do I not have the right to my own style while you also have yours?

This spate of attacks started about 20 years ago when Ovation International magazine published the dual weddings of General Sani Abacha’s daughters, Zeynab and Gumsu. All hell broke loose. A friend of mine was in a hurry to declare a fatwa on Ovation International. The magazine must die, many chorused. I was unmoved by the empty threats.

They told me Nigerians have decided to boycott the magazine and I asked the venue of their meeting. Instead of the magazine dying, it sold out completely. Unknown to my attackers, I had my role models and learned so much from them, theoretically and practically. One of them was The Madiba, Nelson Mandela, who despite spending 27 years behind bars, with many of his comrades murdered, he came back preaching peace and reconciliation. Our own country is in this big mess today, and in perpetual strife and stress, because of our proclivity and propensity for rabid vindictiveness. I found the Abachas newsworthy, I wanted to unveil where and how they lived, and I returned with a monstrous scoop. We even published never seen before pictures of the mausoleum in which Abacha was buried. If I were an American, I would have earned millions of dollars from owning the copyright. Yet my self-righteous critics and colleagues were happy to steal our pictures, shamelessly and lavishly publishing them, without authorization.

Let me give one more example before we get to Senator Dino Melaye’s gallery of a home in Abuja. About five years ago, I was in London when the news of the arrest of former Minister of Petroleum, Mrs Diezani Alison-Madueke, by the British Police, hit the airways like thunderbolt. The reporter in me immediately sprang into action. I pressed a few buttons here and there and soon found those who knew her movements. I pleaded with them to arrange an exclusive interview with her, a seeming impossibility at first. She told my sources that I was an enemy of their government and one of those whose pens sacked them from power. I sent word back that I could be trusted with reporting whatever she says, verbatim, without embellishments or misinterpretations. Once I gave those guarantees, she agreed to meet me at a secret location. I was already seated before she came. And she left before I left. Our mutual contact was present. She was clutching some files which turned out to contain some hospital documents. She looked drained of her usual effervescent life and glowing looks. I was shocked.

We chatted briefly and she told me she was too tired to talk that evening after going through her dose of chemotherapy. I prayed for her recovery, since I’m not a vulture who takes delight in macabre ritual dance of death. We agreed to meet soon, and she left. Our contact promised to make the interview possible, but I should be on standby for an impromptu date and venue. When the call eventually came, I was given the shortest notice possible and my wife had to drive me when I could not get a cab sooner. The venue turned out to be a breakfast restaurant around Regents Park. When I walked in, I saw a black lady who was not Diezani. She recognized me and invited me to a corner where a reservation had been made. Diezani soon walked in clutching some documents again. Because it was morning, this time, I was able to fix a proper gaze on her. Her eyes were bigger and almost bulging out of her sockets. Her hair was substantially off, perhaps the fallout from her chemo treatments, I soliloquized.

I spent time with the famed woman who now cut a pitiable figure in front of me. However, she did not make any effort to be pitied or considered a victim. Despite her palpable discomfort, she was determined to express herself and debunk the stories that she had stolen anything from 20 billion dollars upward. As we spoke, I fired different salvos, what my boss, Mike Awoyinfa, would have called “satanic questions”. She answered some and refused others because she was still under investigation and would not want to jeopardize her case. I used my iPhone to take about hundred pictures from different angles. She cooperated beautifully and I reiterated my promise not to misquote her. We took personal pictures together, for the records, and off I went.

I was pleased with myself, that I got to interview the most wanted woman in Nigeria. Off I went on my other missions. I sent the interview to my team. It came in handy at a time we were already working on an online newspaper to be called The Boss. I was in Dubai when we released this spectacular story. The first person to call me was Omoyele Sowore, the Publisher of Sahara Reporters He requested for unmarked pictures of Diezani. I said I couldn’t oblige since I did not have authorization to hand out her pictures. Also, I suspected the angle of the story or the slant Sahara Reporters would likely bring to the story. All my journalism career, I have steadfastly built a reputation as a mild-mannered reporter with the ability to interview the biggest newsmakers. Days later, Sahara Reporters interviewed a certain lawyer in Lagos who tried to cast aspersions on my exclusive interview by saying Diezani did not grant the interview. I remained unperturbed. Diezani soon reached out to say she never said so to anyone and apologized for the embarrassment.

As soon as our story went out, I received blistering attacks for talking to Diezani. Many of them called me unprintable names. I must have collected part of her billions. Diezani had no cancer. Dele was the one spinning such stories to attract pity. I endured it all.

To achieve success in a land littered with angry people, you must sometimes acquire the skin of a porcupine. Once again, my attackers all used my pictures and story they couldn’t get directly, free of charge!

Let’s now go inside Dino Melaye’s palace in Abuja. I was in the Federal Capital City last weekend and decided to visit Dino, a man who had always treated me with the respect of an avuncular friend. While our friendship started over a decade ago, Dino continues to shower me with tremendous regard. For example, while he commands about two million followers on Twitter, I control one million and three hundred followers. Yet I’m the only soul he follows. I still can’t explain why but I’m one of those who can advise him on any issue, and he won’t feel offended. I had never been to his house and decided to pay him a visit last Saturday. I’m glad I did.

Dino was having a steam session when I arrived. He had his head buried in a bucket, steaming with some hot balms added and covered up with a thick blanket. He signalled to me to wait for him. He later told me he was prone to breathing problems and so must battle any likely infection of the nose and lungs. We spoke generally and then I requested for a tour of his beautiful home. He gladly obliged, but let me reiterate that it was not a planned session. It may have been difficult for any journalist to gain such unrestrained and unrestricted access to every part of that monumental home, but he granted me that privilege as a Brother he loves unconditionally. He once said he would take a bullet for me and I also love him, warts and all, no matter what anyone says about him. Ours is not a business transaction. I respect those who respect me and I’m not in the habit of judging anyone.

Let me say for emphasis, that I was totally wowed by what I saw. I have covered many homes of the rich and famous, including that of Ambassador Antonio Deinde Fernandez, in New York, Alhaji Mai Deribe, in Maiduguri, Chief Richard Osuolale Akinjide in Stanmore, England, Jimoh Ibrahim’s mansion on The Bishop’s Avenue, Chief Gabriel Igbinedion’s home in London, South Africa, Abuja and Benin, Otunba Subomi Balogun, on Glover Road, Ikoyi, Lagos, and others, but Dino’s home turned out to be an artistic masterpiece. Everything in the house was, obviously, deliberately and meticulously, put together. From his vintage and contemporary cars, artworks, dogs, super bikes, chandeliers, gold plated dinner plates and cutlery, elevator, bars, bedrooms, floating swimming pool, assorted drinks which he does not drink, clothes, shoes and the most controversial, over 200 pieces of exotic wristwatches.

I traversed the building inside and outside while I was transmitting live on Instagram. I will rate this unprecedented work of journalistic excellence one of my best stories ever, even if the critics develop epileptic spasms in the process. Everyman has a right to his existence and lifestyle. Very young artists in America fly private jets. The attacks here are because Dino is a politician and there is too much hunger in the land. Every one of the critics was pontificating and pointing accusing fingers at Dino as if they would reject being dashed that architectural edifice, if only for a few days. Worse still, they are angry that I did not ask how he got the money to acquire such expensive taste. I’m sorry, that’s not my job as a celebrity reporter. Others have the capacity to investigate supposed looters, while my focus is on how the money is spent.

From sufficient experience and exposure to men and women of means, I know that Dino has never been in such a position to have executive access to government funds at that level.

Even if he were the Senate President, or Governor of Lagos State, he could not have amassed such stupendous wealth. Where then did he get all that money from? My answer is I don’t know, and I did not expect him to tell me his secrets. All I know is some people are very talented in the art and science of making money and I should never assume I know how or all.

I read one of my attackers yesterday. He is a Facebook journalist who feels so important about abusing anyone in sight. I only felt pity for him because I could feel the bitterness that was choking him up. I wondered why he couldn’t channel all that energy into building his own business and brand instead of wasting his strength on demolishing others. He and his ilk should be told that being bitter can never make your own life better…

It is a fact of life…

Child marriage: Bishop exposes people behind his marriage to JSS2 student

Jacob Adebayo

Bishop Stephanos Enofe who was arrested a few days ago for defiling and marrying a teenager in Lagos has revealed the men behind his act.

The self acclaimed Bishop who is cooling off at the custody of Lagos Police Stage Criminal Investigation Department, Panti, Yaba, said the kingsmen of the survivor’s both in Lagos and Anambra States approved the marriage.

Child marriage pastor 52 marries 15-year old girl in lagos

He also claimed to have had carnal knowledge of the 15-year-old teenager in his apartment.

Meanwhile, two church members who spoke on the matter said the Bishop insisted to marry the teenager despite efforts to discourage him in the church.

He is, however, expected to face the wrath of the law after the ongoing investigation by the police.

In a report by the United Nations Children’s Fund, UNICEF, marriage before the age of 18 is a fundamental violation of human rights. Child marriage decreases a girl’s development by resulting in early pregnancy and social isolation. It interrupts her education, limiting her opportunities for career and vocational advancement, placing her at increased risk of domestic violence, and exposing her to life threatening illnesses.The Child Rights Act adopted by Nigeria in 2003 provides that anyone who has sexual intercourse with a child is liable to imprisonment for life upon conviction.(kiddiesafricanews.)

Police arrest Bishop for underage marriage

By Folake Sokoya

A  54-year-old Bishop, Stephanos Lucky Enofe, who recently married a 15-year-old girl in Lagos State has been arrested by operatives of the Gender Unit of the State Criminal Investigation Department (SCID) of the state’s police command, in Yaba.

Cvnewsng.com had earlier repirted that Enofe, the founder of the Spirit Of Grace (SOG) Ministry, at No. 8 Makinde Street, Idi-Oro area, Mushin in Lagos State, had been engaging the teenager in courtship since age 12.

The suspect, a father of four, had allegedly impregnated the girl, a Junior Secondary School (JSS) 2 student during the COVID-19 lockdown, and in a bid to cover his shenanigans, opted to marry her.

“Bishop” Enofe

The parent of the girl also members of the church, had allegedly consented to the illegal marriage, as bride price was paid in August and the girl asked to move in with the Bishop.

It was also gathered that the suspect’s first wife, who discovered the cruel act three (3) years ago had moved out of his house, refusing to return to him despite attempts to reconcile the couple.
The Bishop is presently at the SCID, Yaba where he’s being questioned for having sexual relations with an underage girl and for illegal marriage

cvnewsng

UNICAL Gets First Female Vice Chancellor, Prof. Florence Obi, 45 Years After Inception

Prof. Florence Obi of the faculty of Education and one-time deputy Vice-Chancellor, Administration at the University of Calabar has emerged as the 11th Vice-Chancellor of the university.

She is also the first female to be so elected.

Chairman of the University Governing Council and the Pro-Chancellor, Senator Nkechi Nwaogu announced to newsmen on Friday that Prof. Obi emerged victorious over twelve others who were eminently qualified as well.

She noted that the governing council was guided by the guidelines for the screening of a vice-chancellor as provided by the federal ministry of education. She maintained the screening exercise was transparent, free and fair to all participants.

Senator Nwaogu said the persistence of Prof Obi may have paid off for her as she had contested for the same position in 2015 but lost.

She charged the new Vice-Chancellor on assumption of duty to look at the things done by the outgoing VC and be able to build upon them.

Responding to newsmen after getting her appointment letter from the governing council of the University, the VC-elect Prof. Florence Obi who is expected to assume work on the 1st December 2020, expressed gratitude to God for have success and pledged to run an inclusive administration.

Professor Florence Banku Obi is a mother of four and grandmother of six from Bansan – Osokom, Boki Local Government Area of Cross River State. With sheer grit and tenacity, she overcame all hurdles to sustain a successful academic voyage.

The journey began from St. Bridget Primary School, Ogep-Osokom in Boki Local Government Area of Cross River State, through St. Thomas’s Teacher Training College, Ogoja, Cross River State, to the University of Jos, Plateau State, and from Jordan Hill College, Glasgow-Scotland to the University of Calabar, where her academic pursuit finally landed her a PhD in Psychology of Education. Her foray into academia and her monumental ascension further illustrates a line in Isaac Watt’s poem that reads, “Little drops of water make a mighty ocean”.

She began her academic career as an Assistant Lecturer at the Institute of Education, University of Calabar in March 1990 (30 years ago). Two years after her appointment (1992), she won a 6-month postgraduate scholarship to Jordan-Hill College of Education, Glasgow, Scotland, under the World University Service (WUS), World-Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) and the Nigerian Conservation Foundation (NCF) in a keenly contested interview for staff of the Institute of Education.

On her return from the United Kingdom (UK), she was placed in charge of the WWF/NCF funded Schools and Community Education programmes. She subsequently facilitated the development of the degree programme in Environmental Education of the University, which had since resulted in the establishment of a full-fledged and flourishing Department of Environmental Education. Professor Obi rose through the ranks to become a Professor of Special Needs Education in 2007.

The Abolition Of NBA Stamp And Seal By The AGF: A Blessing Or A Curse?

By B.C Obilor

The recent amendment of the Rules oF Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners, 2007, has raised a lot of concern. It is really shocking and surprising that such an amendment could be made, especially as it relates to the requirement of STAMP AND SEAL, as ingrained in Rules 10 of the RPC 2007, in this time where there is an alarming increase in number of fake lawyers, the watering down of legal Practitioners work by some recent enactments such as the New CAMA where lawyers are now being dispensed with during registration of companies, coupled with the ongoing parallel formation of a new NBA by Northern Lawyers( NNBA), to say the list, is really scaring and disappointing. I am forced to as , what is the Future of our dearest profession?

THE POWER OF AGF TO AMEND THE RPC

It is as clear as summer sky that the Legal Practitioners Act, CapL11, 2004 empowers the BAR COUNCIL to make Rules for the Regulation of the legal profession. For the avoidance of doubt, let me pluck out the provisions wherein it is ingrained in the Statute book, Ipsissima Verba:

Section 12(4) of the LPA Provides:

It shall be the duty of the Bar Council to make Rules from time to time on Professional Conduct in the legal profession and cause such rules to be published in the Gazette and distributed to all the branches of the association.

It must be noted that the contentious amendment by the AGF was claimed to have been made pursuant to the above provisions.  This has generated a lot of arguments. Some are of the view that the AGF cannot unilaterally emend the RPC without consultation or recourse to the BAR COUNCIL.  However, a careful and microscopic perusal of the LPA clearly shows that THE AGF is the president of the BAR COUNCIL. In other words, it is my view that there is a rebuttable presumption that the AGF acted in line with the provisions of the law, since he is the president of the BAR COUNCIL.  It behoves on the Members of the BAR COUNCIL to complain that they were not carried along. Therefore, it is my humble submission that the AGF acted within the scope of his power as the president of the BAR COUNCIL, at least for now. However, if it turns out that he amended the Rule without recourse to the BAR COUNCIL, then he acted ultra vires.

Removing the Requirements of STAMP AND SEAL CANNOT BE A BLESSING.

The need for the requirements of stamp and seal can not be over emphasied. The policy of Stamp and Seal introduced by the NBA few years ago was a good step in the right direction which was aimed at restoring sanity in the legal profession and regulating the activities of imposters.

Prior to the introduction of the NBA STAMP AND SEAL, we had situations where nonlawyers/ clients after engaing lawyers to prepare documents, sou Motu reproduce the precedent in subsequent transactions without recourse to the lawyer. We also have situations where clients and nonlawyers connive with paralegals to get precedent from their places of work and execute same without the consent and knowledge of the lawyers whose names appears on the said documents. The list is inexhaustible.

REMOVING THE REQUIREMENTS OF STAMP AND SEAL WILL FURTHER WATER DOWN THE PROFESSION AND EXPOSE THE NBA TO RIDICULE.

The introduction of the Stamp and Seal has been a blessing to the legal profession. Infact, it has further reduced and checkmated the activities of fake lawyers. To a large extent, it brought nobility and pride to the legal profession as it distinguished the legal profession from other professions in Nigeria. It is my view that removing such an excellent provision at a time like this, will not only water down the profession but will further ingnite the division and disunity that is cooking in different quarters.

Conclusion:

While we await the response of other members of the Bar Council to ascertain whether the AGF acted suo motu or not, it is important to clearly state that the amendment of the RPC , particularly the abolition of STAMP AND SEAL is suspicious and is tantamount to a retrogression in the legal profession. In as much as we all are clamouring for the amendment of the RPC, the provisions relating to STAMP AND SEAL is not one them.

It is my veiw that the amendment abolishing Stamp and Seal will only encourage division, fuel disunity, water down the profession and expose the legal profession to the activities of fake lawyers and unscropulous imposters. Thus, it is indeed a curse and not a blessing to abolish Stamp and seal.

Long live NBA !
Long live the legal profession!!
Long live the Federal Republic of Nigeria!!!

Respectfully;
— B. C OBILOR[email protected])

2023: Plot To Install Governor As Buhari’s Successor Will Fail — Marafa

A former governorship aspirant in Zamfara State, Senator Kabiru Garba Marafa, yesterday warned stalwarts of the All Progressives Congress (APC) to be wary of alleged plot to install a serving governor as President Muhammadu Buhari’s successor in 2023.

He said the plot by some members of the Governors’ Forum to hijack the APC machinery to install the serving governor to succeed President Buhari will crumble like a pack of cards.

Marafa, who represented Zamfara Central Senatorial District in the Eighth Senate, spoke in Abuja while charting the way forward for the party’s reconciliation committee.

He said: “There are good people in the committee who mean well for the party, and I advise them to wake up and do what they are asked to do and leave the politics of 2023.

“Nobody can bring the position of national chairman to the North now. The moves by some within the Governors’ Forum to hijack the party and install a serving governor and an expired one to succeed President Buhari will crash the way former Governor Abdulaziz Yari’s selfish agenda crashed totally.”

On the statement credited to Yari that APC in Zamfara is intact and that Governor Mai Mala Buni’s reconciliation committee should go to sleep, Marafa noted that though he is not bothered, the committee should be mindful of people who speak from both sides of their mouths.

On the allegation that he is romancing with the PDP government in the state, having produced the SSG and some commissioners, Marafa said: “Well, I am equally not bothered by whether someone wants to reconcile with me or not. Politically speaking, I am comfortable and at peace with myself.

“I am still in the APC because I choose to, not because of fear of prosecution. I am part and parcel of the efforts that produced APC. The party did nothing to me; I did everything for it. All the political troubles I faced are traceable to my support for APC.

“Remember the 8th National Assembly leadership crisis? Remember how Yari scuttled the APC plan?

“I was a senator of the Federal Republic when APC was formed. I contributed immensely to its success.

“I listened to Yari’s press briefing after his visit to the APC secretariat; he cowardly tried to say something like he sent some people to the National Assembly, but the moment they were there, they forgot how they got in there.

“Let me put the record straight: in 2011 when Yari was desperate to become governor, he came to my house in my village the night PDP fraudulently denied me ticket in favour of the then incumbent senator.

“Yari begged me to accept their (ANPP) ticket, which at that time meant nothing, looking at the fact that the federal, state and local governments were all under the firm control of the PDP.

“He didn’t bring the ticket to my house because he loved me; ANPP offered me the ticket because they were desperate to win the election.

“He pleaded with me to contest because he knew I have people behind me. They love me and the people of Zamfara Central demonstrated their love for me by giving me 100,000 votes over and above the incumbent senator.

“The incumbent Senator got 93,000 votes and I got 203,000 votes.

“Senator Yarima, who came from the same zone with Yari, won marginally with less than 7,000 votes. PDP’s Senator Sahabi Ya’u won the other zone with a margin of about 10,000 votes. So, I brought the winning votes.

“The records are there, and the situation is still the same. It was after he spent eight years as governor that he thought he was strong enough to uproot me, but God taught him the lesson of his life.

“Or do you think it is easy for a poor senator to challenge a sitting governor, Chairman Governors’ Forum with unlimited resources from his state, Paris Club and all other clubs you can think of?

“He could not as a sitting governor, for instance, match my rally. He in fact could not organise one. My rally was played live on NTA; go and find out. I defeated him hands-down.

“Look, I am used to taking risk. I took risk with him (Yari) in 2011. I can still take risk today. I challenge him to come out and take risk.

“What is he doing in APC? He is only afraid of EFCC. Let me and him pick two different political parties other than the ruling party, contest election and see who will win.

“He should stop this hypocrisy and face reality. He is the one that is desperately looking for reconciliation because he caused the problem, not me. He used state resources and incumbency power to get undue advantage. He is now down and out, so he should stop deceiving himself.”

Slovenian Woman Jailed For Cutting Off Hand For Insurance Payout

A Slovenian court has sentenced a 22-year-old woman to two years in prison after finding her guilty of cutting off her hand to claim insurance.

The woman’s 30-year-old partner, accused of putting her up to it, was given three years in prison by the Ljubljana District Court on Friday, the country’s news agency STA reported.

It was not clear Saturday if the pair, who had pleaded not guilty, would appeal the verdict.

The woman, Julija Adlesic, was detained early last year for allegedly cutting off her hand at the wrist with a circular saw to get nearly 400,000 euros ($470,000) in insurance compensation.

The woman is thought to have staged the incident, together with three others, earlier this year shortly after the group signed life and injury insurance contracts with five different insurance companies.

The woman was hoping to get around 380,000 euros of compensation and a life-long monthly payout of some 3,000 euros, according to police.

The group intentionally left the hand behind rather than bringing it with them to the hospital, hoping to receive three times higher compensation for permanent disability after what she claimed was an accident, police had said.

But authorities managed to pick up the hand in time, and doctors in a hospital in the capital Ljubljana were able to reattach it.

The average monthly net income is around 1,000 euros in Slovenia.

Amendment Of The Rules Of Professional Conduct In The Legal Profession In Nigeria: Myths And Realities

By Bukola Akinola, PhD[1]

Introduction

Many lawyers in Nigeria woke up on the 12th day of September, 2020 to see the purported Rules of Professional Conduct (Amendment) 2020 dated 3rd September, 2020 allegedly amended by the Honourable Attorney General of the Federation pursuant to section 12 (4) of the Legal Practitioners Act 2004 as amended.  The Notice comes with Serial Number S. 1 No. 15 of 2020 which contains only provisions purported to have deleted Rules 9(2), 10, 11, 12 and 13 of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners 2007. The second provision is to the effect that the amended Rules may be cited as the Rules of Professional Conduct, 2020. It is no gain saying the fact that the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners is very vital to the practice of law in Nigeria and beyond. This paper will briefly examine the modus operandi for the amendment of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners.

Power to Make and Revise the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners

The importance of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners cannot be over emphasized. It is one of the spines upon which the legal profession leans. The same importance is given to the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners across several jurisdictions outside Nigeria. We should not play politics with it under any guise. We should faithfully adhere to its tenets and principles. It is either the Rules or nothing. It is important to state that the Rules are made by virtue of the powers conferred on the General Council of the Bar by section 12 (4) of the Legal Practitioners Act 2004.

Section 1 of the Legal Practitioners Act 2004 as amended establishes the General Council of the Bar. The General Council of the Bar (otherwise known as the Bar Council) was first established under section 1 (1) of the Legal Practitiners 1962 and later replaced by the Legal Practitioners Act 1975[2]. The quorum of the Bar Council shall be eight and the Council may make standing orders regulating procedure and proceedings of the Council.[3]

Composition of the General Council of the Bar[4]

  1. The Attorney-General of the Federation as President;
  2. The Attorneys-General of the States;
  • Twenty members of the Bar

In the legal profession, the above composition is a body of eminent personalities who are vested with powers to among others act as one of the gate keepers of the legal profession. They work hand in hand with eminent bodies such as the Body of Benchers and the Nigerian Bar Association to mention a few. The office of the Honourable Attorney – General of the Federation (HAGF) is one of the highly revered bodies in the legal profession and the nation as a whole. The HAGF is a custodian of the values and ethics of the legal profession. Above all other considerations, the HAGF is ‘the legal gate keeper’ of the constitution of the nation. He can only exercise powers conferred on him by statute and no more.

Functions of the General Council of the Bar

A major function of the General Council of the Bar is its power to make and revise the Rules of professional Conduct in the legal profession from time to time.[5] The Bar Council also liaises with the NBA in fixing the annual practising fee for members of the Bar. The Bar Council makes the Legal Practitioners Accounts Rules and oversees the inspection of Solicitor’s accounts from time to time among other statutory functions. See section 20 LPA[6].

Amendment of the Rules of Professional Conduct in the Legal Profession in Nigeria: Myths and Realities.

Being a Council of distinguished legal luminaries, the functions of the Bar Council cannot be hijacked by any individual member of the Council. It is on this basis that the powers of the Bar Council to make and revise the Rules of Professional Conduct in the Legal Profession cannot be delegated to a single member of the profession except the Council in a quorum of 8 of its membership agrees in writing. Such delegation of powers on behalf of the Bar Council cannot be delegated in our view.

Hence, the fact that the Preamble to the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners 2007 is couched as reproduced below does not make it lawful or the norm. An office holder cannot exercise the powers he does not have. It amounts to taking away a man’s wife and telling him not to react. The preamble to the RPC 2007 is reproduced below for our examination:

In exercise of the powers conferred on me by section 12(4) of the Legal Practitioners Act 1990, as amended, and of all other powers enabling me in that behalf, I, BAYO OJO, Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice/ Chairman, General Council of the Bar hereby make the following Rules:

The fact that no one has challenged the way and manner the above is drafted does not render nugatory section 12 (4) of the Legal Practitioners Act 2004 as amended. For the avoidance of doubt, section 12 (4) of the LPA 2004 as amended is reproduced below:

(4) It shall be the duty of the Bar Council to make rules from time to time on professional conduct in the legal profession and cause such rules to be published in the Gazette and distributed to all the branches of the Association.[7]

Unlike the powers of the office of the Chief Justice of Nigeria to make Rules for the proceedings of the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee under section 10 (7) of the LPA 2004 as amended and the powers to suspend an erring legal practitioner for a specified period of time vested in the CJN by virtue of section 13 (2) of the LPA 2004 as amended, the HAGF cannot unilaterally make the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners because neither the HAGF or the Attorney – general of the various states of the Federation are so conferred. Besides, the law has made it easier for the Bar Council to operate smoothly with just 8 members out of a total 57 membership. Forming a quorum by the Bar Council may need an upward review of about one – third or minimum of 15 members in our view but definitely that is the position of the law as of today.

Let us state here that the intention of this paper is not to critique the allegedly deleted provisions of the Rules 9(2), 10, 11, 12 and 13 of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners 2007 but to offer an opinion as to the proper perspective in the powers to make and revise this vital regulation for the noble profession in Nigeria. In the making and revision of the RPC, until the amended RPC is gazetted and distributed in line with the spirit and legislative intent of section 12 (4) LPA 2004 as amended, it is of no effect.

We therefore recommend that the preamble to the RPC 2007 as stated above should be drafted thus:

In exercise of the powers conferred on the Bar Council by section 12(4) of the Legal Practitioners Act 1990, as amended, and of all other powers enabling the Bar Council in that behalf, the, General Council of the Bar hereby make the following Rules:

The legislative intent of the LPA is not to personalize the powers to make and amend the RPC to the office of the Chairman of the Bar Council.

Conclusion

Though, the HAGF being Chairman of the Bar Council can preside and give directives during the meeting of the Council, the power to make and revise the RPC is vested in the Bar Council as a body and not the HAGF as an office created by law and known to law. It is therefore mythical to presume that the preamble to the RPC 2007 as couched is right in law when the searchlight of the provisions of section 12 (4) of the LPA 2004 as amended is beamed in that direction. As stated above, the intention of this writer is not the propriety or otherwise of the subject of amendment but to reflect proper legal perspectives in terms of who is empowered to make and revise the RPC. The subject of amendment is a discourse for another day.

[1] Dr Bukola Akinola is a Deputy Director (Academics) at the Nigerian Law School.

[2] Now Cap 11, LFN 2004

[3] Section 1 (4) of the Legal Practitioners Act Cap L11 LFN 2004

[4] Section 1(2) of the LPA

[5] See section 12 (4) of the Legal Practitioners Act (as amended by the Legal Practitioners (amendment) Decree 1994.

[6] Now Cap 11, LFN 2004

[7] Section 12 (4) of the LPA as amended by LPA 1994 as amended.

Condemnation Of Purported Amendment Of The Rules Of Professional Conduct By AGF, Malami, “Belated & Not Well Rooted In Good Faith”—J.S Okutepa, SAN

Senior Advocate of Nigeria and a member of the Body of Benchers, Mr. J.S Okutepa has stated that the wave around the purported amendment of the Rules of Professional Conduct by the Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, is belated and laced with no good faith.

This is contained in a statement issued by the learned silk which was made available to TheNigeriaLawyer (TNL).

“I do no think we as members of the legal profession are consistent in our stand and condemnation of illegally and usurpation of functions particularly on the alleged amendments said to have been made to Rules of Professional Conduct in the Legal Profession 2007.

“This morning I woke up to read from social media that the Hon the Attorney General of the Federation has amended the Rules of Professional Conduct in the Legal Profession 2007.” He said.

Meanwhile, he noted that although he is yet to confirm the veracity of the news going around but however, the condemnation is late.

“I am yet to confirm this. But if the amendments done are indeed at the instance and by the Hon Attorney of the Federation, then I see the condemnation by some legal Practitioners as belated and not well rooted in good faith. The reason is simple.

As lawyers we must be consistent in our stand and positions. I had said before that the appropriate organ saddles with the duty and responsibility to issue and make the Rules of Professional Conduct in the Legal Profession is the General Council of the Bar pursuant to section 12(4) of the Legal Practitioners Act as amended by law No 21 of 1994.” He said.

However, he stated that the 2007 Rules was issued by the AGF as it confers more financial advantages on NBA.

“The 2007 Rules was issued by the Hon Attorney General of the Federation. Those who care to read the Rules can see the preamble to the Rules wherein it was expressly stated to have been issued by the Hon the Attorney General of the Federation.

“Because that Rules conferred more financial advantages on our Association NBA, nobody took my stand and few other lawyers serious when we spoke that the Rules was not issued in accordance with due process of law.” He said.

Furthermore, he stated that he was part of the people that led prosecution of unprofessional conduct of Lawyers.

“I recall Prof Ojukwu SAN speaking on this at one NBA functions. Under the 2007 Rules, I had the privilege to lead the prosecution of lawyers who committed Professional misconduct and some were debarred and some suspended from practice.” He said.

“As lawyers, we collectively led the office of the Hon the Attorney General of the Federation to believe that it has power and duty to issue the Rules. What is the hullabaloo on the alleged amendments said to have been made by the Hon the Attorney General of the Federation then for. Did we not use the old one made by the HAGF.” He added.

In addition, he stated that Lawyers have equally encouraged encroachment of powers in this regard.

“I read the statement of my very good learned friend Mazi Afam Osigwe. Beautiful. I respect his views. He captures well the position of law. But beyond this beautiful position of law, did we as lawyers, not the ones that has encouraged this usurpation of functions and powers over the years.

“Where were the eagle eyes of the legal profession gone to when the previous Rules that conferred a financial advantage on our Association was being used. Have we not over the years accepted as correct wrongs and rots in our profession.” He said.

“I do not want to think and believe that it is because the amendment if true is attracting our pious and eagle eyes now because it is likely to deny our association financial benefits.” He added.

Finally, he stated that members of the profession must be consistent in challenging illegalities.

“We must be consistent in what we do and challenge illegality and usurpation of powers even when such usurpation is to our professional Association advantage. It is then I can follow properly. For now we are estopped from challenging the power of AGF to issue us new Rules. Am just trying to make sense.” He concluded.

New People’s Constitution Through National Conference Is The Only Way Out From The Flawed Nigerian Constitution — Afe Babalola, SAN

Afe Babalola, the founder of Afe Babalola University, Ado Ekiti, says politicians are benefiting from the “flaws” in the 1999 constitution.

In an interview with TheSun, Babalola said because they are beneficiaries of the constitution, they would not be able to make proper amendments where necessary.

The 1999 constitution was drawn under the supervision of the military, and some of its contents were part of the draft constitution prepared under Sani Abacha, the late head of state.

The senior advocate of Nigeria (SAN) explained that the calls for the amendment of the constitution were not necessary, adding that what was needed was a sovereign national conference to produce a new constitution that would benefit the ordinary people.

“The only way out is not an amendment to the flawed constitution but a new people’s constitution through a sovereign national conference,” he said.

“The politicians who are in government, in the national assembly, and who are benefiting from the flawed constitution can never make any good and proper constitution for this country and no amendment can ever do so.

“In 1965, we had a house of assembly and the senate. Nobody earned salaries then; what they earned was sitting allowance.

“Look at the house of assembly, senate. Now, hardly will you find 50 people there in a day and they earn salaries. They even talked about pension. So, there is no way you can amend the constitution. They will make sure that they remain earning these billions of naira. We are the only country where people earn billions.”

According to him, the 1999 constitution was drafted to allow the “military to perpetuate themselves in power”.

“For example, Awolowo paid 55 percent of the revenue on education, knowing the importance of education. People saw themselves as Nigerians then. Unfortunately, the military came in 1966, jettisoned the constitution and ruled by decrees. When they were going away in 1999, they did not return us to the constitution which they suspended and then they brought their own constitution and presented it as constitution made by Nigerians. That was a lie; even right from the face of it, it was a lie,” Babalola said.

“Actually, the constitution they made was done in such a way that it will allow the military to perpetuate themselves in power, and that is why you find, all the time, those who are in the military were coming back in one form or the other. We have never had good government ever since.”

The lawyer said the only way Nigeria could get it right with its constitution is by calling for a “sovereign national conference”.

“The meaning of that is that whatever they decide will not be subject to amendments by these people,” he said.

“I have participated in many conferences and at the end of the day what comes out of it? They want to spend another N2 billion for amendment; what are you amending?”

TIPS