The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on Tuesday in Abuja commenced the trial of an oil magnate, Dr Akintoye Akindele, accused of complicity in the conversion of the sum of $35 million belonging to the Nigeria Content Development and Monitoring Board (NCDMB).
The sum was said to have been converted from the money paid by the NCDMB Capacity Development Intervention Company Ltd to Atlantic International Refinery and Petrochemical Limited as investment in the establishment of a modular refinery, a jetty, amongst others in Brass, Bayelsa State.
Akindele was arraigned alongside two others on a four-count charge bordering on retaining and using several amounts of money despite having knowledge that they emanate from an unlawful activity.
The two other defendants in the suit marked: FHC/ ABJ/ CR/ 641/2024, are Platform Capital Investment Partners Ltd and Duport Midstream Company Ltd.
He, however, pleaded not guilty and was admitted to bail to enable him to prepare adequately for his trial.
At Tuesday’s proceedings, the anti-graft agency called its first prosecution witness (PW1), Hon. Isreal Sunny Goli, a former member of the Bayelsa State House of Assembly.
The witness had last year petitioned the EFCC over the disbursement of funds for the Brass Fertiliser and Petrochemical Company Ltd, Atlantic International Refinery and Petrochemical Limited and the Brass Petroleum Product Terminal Limited under the immediate Executive Secretary of the NCDMB, Kiyesi Simbi Wabote.
Led in evidence by prosecution counsel, R. U. Adagba, the witness told the court that his petition to the EFCC was predicated because nothing tangible was done at the project site 24 months after funds were disbursed to the relevant agencies.
According to him, the NCDMB secretary had informed them that the sum of $30 million for the project had been paid in full, but unfortunately, nothing tangible was done at the project site.
During cross-examination by Akindele ‘s lawyer, Chief A. O. Okeaya-Inneh, SAN, the witness stated that, beyond the clearing of the project site and a non-functional jetty, nothing was done by those who collected the money.
He added that the caravans that Atlantic Ltd used to accommodate their staff have been overtaken by reptiles.
While disagreeing with Akindele’s claim that Brass was a difficult environment, he stated that there was no security challenge in the area in the 24 months.
When asked if he knew whether the $35 million was an equity investment or for the entire project, he said, “I don’t know, but the secretary told us it was for the project and it has been paid in full”.
The witness earlier told the court that he does not know if the EFCC was prosecuting the NCDMB in regards to the Brass project, since he is not an investigator.
He also said he does not know if the NCDMB filed any petition in regards to the project.
Also responding to counsel to the 2nd and 3rd defendants, Mr B. J. Akomolafe, SAN, the witness stated that he did not come across the name of Duport Midstream in the course of the investigation.
When asked if he was able to ascertain that any money was paid to Duport Midstream, he said, “What the secretary told us is that money was paid to Atlantic International Refinery and Petrochemical Limited.
After the end of cross-examination, EFCC’s lawyer, Adagba, prayed the court for an adjournment to enable the commission call its second witness in the matter.
An attempt by Okeaya-Inneh to move an application seeking leave for his client to travel abroad for medical checkups could not proceed because the counter affidavit filed by the prosecution was not before the court.
Justice Ekerete Akpan subsequently adjourned till 10 and 15 of July for the continuation of the trial.
Akindele and Platform Capital Investment Partners Ltd were said to have between December, 2020 and February, 2021, “indirectly retained the sum of $16, 006, 000 being part of the funds dishonestly converted from the money paid by the NCDMB Capacity Development Intervention Company Ltd to Atlantic International Refinery and Petrochemical Limited as investment when you knew that the said sum of $16, 006, 000 constituted proceed of unlawful activity and you thereby committed an offence contrary to section 15 (2) (d) of the Money Laundering Prohibition Act, 2011 as amended by (Act No. ! of 2012) and punishable under section 15(3) of the same Act.
They were in count two of the charge alleged to have, within the same period, indirectly used the aggregate sum of $9, 048 725, being part of the funds dishonestly converted from the money paid by the NCDMB to Atlantic Limited as investment.
However in count three Akindele and Duport were alleged to have indirectly retained the sum of $784, 681, being part of the funds dishonestly converted from the money pad by the NCDMB Capacity Development Intervention Company Ltd to Atlantic Ltd as investment “when you knew that the said sum of $785, 681 constituted proceed of unlawful activity and you thereby committed an offence contrary to section 15 (2) (d) of the Meney Laundering Prohibition Act, 2011 as amended by (Act No. | of 2012) and punishable under section 15(3) of the same Act.
Akindele and Duport in count four were also alleged to have, sometime in December 2020, indirectly retained the sum of $220, 000, being part of the funds dishonestly converted from the money paid by the NCDMB to Atlantic Ltd.
